Your Call - Brandon Marshall for David Harris and a 3rd-Round Pick
You've heard the reports, you've seen the Tweets. The Broncos have reportedly let the New York Jets know that any deal for Brandon Marshall would require the inclusion of ILB David Harris. Harris, a former 2nd-round pick from Michigan, has been a solid starter for the Jets and would instantly unseat Andra Davis as the inside backer next to D.J. Williams. The Broncos defense would get younger and more athletic.
The reports have also said the deal could include a 3rd-round pick as well, providing the Broncos the chance to acquire more talent in the 2010 Draft.
The downside? Trading a dynamic young Wide Receiver who could be entering the prime of his career. Of course, we all know the baggage. Brandon Marshall has practiced just a handful of times since the Pro Bowl in February and admittedly has no clue what is going on in the playbook. Even if Marshall changes his attitude and returns this weekend a new man, how long would it be before he could contribute?
He is coming off two different off-seasons of serious injuries and there is all of the off-field risk as well. Did I mention he likely wants a new contract somewhere in the neighborhood of 7 years / $50 million??
All of those things have to be accounted for, so I ask you Broncos Country -
0 recs |
350 comments
|
Comments
I'd do it.
I think Harris + at least a 3rd round pick is fair enough.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 2, 2009 9:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Common gives the Vikes a call
Chester Tayler and Tavaris Jackson for Marshall. I understand Denver might want Taylor to sign a two or three year contract to make it worth their while, as he is a free agaent after this season. I think Chester would do it and would love to play in Denver.
Taylor would rush for over 1200yards (maybe 1500) if he is healthy the whole season and is named the starter. Moreno won’t come in and be as good as Taylor in his first season. Kyle Orton would love having Taylor around to dunk the ball off to. However by seasons end Tavaris could prove to be a better option than Orton.
The caracter issues might hold the Vikes back, but maybe they would suck it up for that kind of talent.
Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!
by VikesPma on Sep 3, 2009 7:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would work for the Vikings, but ...
I’ve seen Tavaris Jackson play, and no thanks. Chester Taylor is getting kind of old.
by FtCoNative on Sep 3, 2009 8:34 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please no...
I don’t know who keeps thinking Tavaris Jackson is a talented QB and constantly saying he’s got McNabb like qualities. This guy is a backup and that’s it. How much more time are they going to give this guy to ‘develop?’
Favorite Blogs:
www.spongereport.com
www.yardbarker.com
www.milehighreport.com
www.bleacherreport.com
by brohamm1978 on Sep 3, 2009 9:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
I like Harris and another pick would be fair. I think Denver has a good bit of WRs so Marshall, although he’ll initially be missed, we’ll get by just fine. It depends more on how well the QB will do
Favorite Blogs:
www.spongereport.com
www.yardbarker.com
www.milehighreport.com
www.bleacherreport.com
by brohamm1978 on Sep 3, 2009 9:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Drop all the drama.
If you keep him, it isn’t going away. Get rid of the problem and get a starting LB and a good pick. Let’s get rid of the drama and get back to football.
by Broncoholic_07 on Sep 2, 2009 9:11 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Good Call
I would trade Marshall for that value, even though he is an explosive receiver.
The problem is, as everybody knows, that he explodes in all directions… and quite frankly there’s as much of a chance that his trade value decreases further than going up.
by sabbath999 on Sep 3, 2009 11:06 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we have a "maybe" option? ;-p
I was encouraged when I heard that Marshall was again listening to Rod Smith. Could it be that the suspension woke him up and he’s now going to apply himself?
I think we’d be able to tell in short order if that was going to happen. If he straightens up, keep him, if not, trade him.
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Sep 2, 2009 9:12 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I say YES
id pretty much take any decent trade offer right now. might as well get some value before we lose him in FA
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win"-Brandon Marshall
GET TO CAMP BRANDON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by broncoboy on Sep 2, 2009 9:13 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Well, in FA, he will ethier be restricted or we can franchise him so we will never really "lose him"
by Calibroncoboy on Sep 2, 2009 9:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah but with his baggage, not playing a season, and a huge contract cuz of the fanchise.....
i think we would be untradeable
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win"-Brandon Marshall
GET TO CAMP BRANDON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by broncoboy on Sep 2, 2009 9:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
so is this close to being a done deal?
"It means nothing to throw for 4500 yards, 25 touchdowns, and you dont win"-Brandon Marshall
GET TO CAMP BRANDON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by broncoboy on Sep 2, 2009 9:14 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd do it....
Like I said during the interview earlier and in the post, there is no way of knowing Marshall will be able to play 16 games. Then, of course, there is the contract situation at the end of this year and a player that will likely be unhappy all season. Even if he is a good soldier, it will be a cloud over this team the entire season.
I didn’t want to give Marshall up for a pick. I wanted the Broncos to get a player back in return that could start and make an impact. Harris is a solid LB and would improve our defense right off the bat. The main question becomes, do you feel more confident in the production Harris will give us or the production Marshall will give us in 2009? Me? I think Harris is more of a sure thing.
The 3rd round pick allows us to get fiscally responsible talent in the 2010 draft to continue improving the overall talent-base of the roster. If these were the elements of a trade I would make the deal.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Sep 2, 2009 9:21 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yes.
Davis is old and slow, and Harris is a young, athletic playmaker who does his job and keeps his mouth shut. What once was a liability (covering the middle zone) instantly becomes a strength. All for the price of a guy who probably won’t play anyway. Plus more ammo and more leverage in the draft? It’d be a win-win for both sides, but I think we’d come out with more win. And we still have Eddie, who is worth 5 of Brandon.
And does the comment box look smaller to everyone else??
"In the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." -Ian Faith
by papigrande on Sep 2, 2009 9:19 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that we might actually have TWO Eddies.
From what little I have seen of him, Nate Swift kind of reminds me of Eddie Mac. He is still developing of course.
by Orange Crush II on Sep 3, 2009 1:20 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's another thought, too
The trade might free up roster space to keep Nate on the 53-man roster. I’d like to see him get a chance to develop. I like his size, and I think he could become one of those ‘catch trash in the middle of the field over DBs’, possession-type receivers that we need.
by BroncosBassist on Sep 3, 2009 6:58 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are we sure Harris would play LILB?
Might he unseat Haggan as the LOLB?
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Sep 2, 2009 9:22 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I want what is best for this team......
get rid of Marshall and get a faster LB and more depth in the future? May as well do it.
fader nation is a conquered nation
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!
by mdierk on Sep 2, 2009 9:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
If it were a 2nd round pick, I'd do it in a heartbeat
So I suppose I’d make the deal as is.
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Sep 2, 2009 9:24 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
After further deliberation- no
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Sep 2, 2009 10:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some worrisome caveats
I voted yes in the poll, but only from an onfield perspective. Off the field, I’m concerned the message this sends to potential future players. Their perception may be they can come to Denver, take the money, put up a fuss and get traded if things don’t go how they hope.
As far as Marshall goes, I say let him come back from suspension, monitor his actions and attitude (he’s already alienated the locker room so he’ll get no sympathy) and then follow league advised suspension policies. This way, I believe, the organization can maintain a posititve perception across the league and avoid becoming the Raiders
I may be dumb, but I'm not stupid.
Major League Baseball is nothing more than a waste of time until football season starts.
by NateinAZ on Sep 2, 2009 9:26 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed that it could set a worrisome precedence
but with McDaniels intentionally building a culture of team first, I tend to believe the FO will be very careful of the type of players they bring in — that is, those who are brought here to play will be team-first players & will be rewarded for playing that way. Those two things, IMHO, would go a long way to offset/deter/prevent the potential problem children who might rise up.
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Sep 2, 2009 9:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points
and I think Bowlen is a long way from becoming Ed Grimsley (I mean Al Davis), I must say.
I may be dumb, but I'm not stupid.
Major League Baseball is nothing more than a waste of time until football season starts.
by NateinAZ on Sep 2, 2009 9:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand your concerns, I really do
But the Raiders are the Raiders because they keep bringing these guys in (guys like BMarsh).
If the Broncos do what’s best for the Broncos, it sends a message I’m comfortable with. Especially after hearing what Bailey had to say about Marshall the other day.
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 9:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
besides
If we keep him we still have issues, constantly waiting for the next shoe to drop and yank him away on suspension during the season, when it would really hurt. I’m starting to rethink the “precedent” argument, because we’re sort of damned if we do and damned if we don’t, and I imagine the brass would probably rather roll the dice with other players who (a) they selected themselves and (b) don’t have his history. In that context, this is sort of the lesser of two evils. And if we get value, it’s probably a good move.
And I said no. Can I change my vote now? LOL
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Sep 2, 2009 9:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yet another way
MHR is better than the United States. ;-)
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 9:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
now now....
The US makes MHR possible
fader nation is a conquered nation
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!
by mdierk on Sep 2, 2009 10:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Give me MHR or give me death!
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
But I’d still like to open the Rome office for MHR
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dibs on the Virgin Islands branch!
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Sep 2, 2009 10:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember, it's NEW YORK...
A malcontent like Marshall will get into more trouble in NY. Also, cameras will follow him everywhere, especially since he behaves like a diva. He’ll crack.
by God Elway on Sep 2, 2009 10:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the opposite will happen, actually.
He’s a guy who demands the spotlight, and it’s brightest in NY. He’ll soak it all up and enjoy it whereas being caged out here in this cowtown hasn’t been enough because people here don’t eat the bullshit he shovels on a consistent basis. I think he’d be great with the Jets. Besides, green and white is good for the figure, right?
I thought you knew that algebra was all razzamatazz. A Globetrotter always saves the good algebra for the final minutes.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Sep 2, 2009 10:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes he'll love the spotlight
but no I don’t think it’ll be good for him. If he didn’t get into trouble in NY within a year of being there I’d be stunned.
And keep that handgun out of your sweatpants, Brandon!
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Sep 2, 2009 11:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fans don't get more fickle than Jets fans
He’ll be the hero one week, and they’ll be chasing him around with a stick the next. I’m not sure how he’ll handle that.
by BroncosBassist on Sep 3, 2009 7:00 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What happens to Woodyard and Larsen, though?
They seem to be pretty good in their own right.
This is our team, let's have fun with it! - dmitchell624
by solace on Sep 2, 2009 9:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Quality depth
The past few years in the NFL have shown how important that is to winning a championship.
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 9:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
sure but..
Remember, Larsen got hurt last year. Harris missed 5 games last year as well. It’s a brutal sport, and depth can’t hurt.
by Hobnail_Boot on Sep 2, 2009 9:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
As I said in my very first post on MHR
I think Marshall will last four or five games before doing something else stupid, and then we’ve got nothin’.
Make the trade. Instantly improves our weakest link on D right now.
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 9:32 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Harris would make me feel a heck of a lot better about our D
I like Harris. I thought he was a very solid player coming out of Michigan. His reports were that hes a hard working leader.
If Gaffney hadn’t gotten hurt Id say we should do this trade in a heartbeat, but it worries me greatly that hes out. All in all this seems like the best deal possible for Marshall. After his tirade during practice I kinda felt we would be lucky to get a second or third round pick alone for Marshall.
This is a rebuilding year and picking up Harris will allow our D to get younger, more athletic, and have a potential starter at the position for many more years.
Problem is….will the jets make this trade?
On To Victory!!!
by alacumba!! on Sep 2, 2009 9:36 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Guru?
What’s your take on this trade rumor in light of the Broncos announcing that they want the NFL to investigate the Jets for tampering?
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Sep 2, 2009 9:38 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
aRUH???

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Sep 2, 2009 9:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Make that trade
please. How can Marshall fit in after the other players’ comments…not to suggest the comments were anything but appropriate. Just get what you can and begin building a team.
by phondonkey on Sep 2, 2009 9:42 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Feel like I'm in the minority here
and I don’t know much about Harris, but I just think Marshall makes a bigger difference to our offense than Harris would to our D (as compared with who we have now—Davis, Larsen, etc…). Of course this presupposes we’re going to get Marshall’s full effort, but I voted NO. I may be seeing this with blinders on, but I still have hope that Marshall could screw his head back on and contribute over the long haul….
"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" -- Wimpy J. Wellington
by Broncs Cheer on Sep 2, 2009 9:42 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I said no, because I don’t know a thing about Harris and I think we need a 2 or a 1.
But after reading the comments, people seem to think highly of Harris… and a 3 never hurts… so, I’m starting to like it.
It sure would be nice to never have to worry about BM again.
by aLuffabo on Sep 2, 2009 9:43 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I keep saying this
If you go into a furniture store, like a particular sofa but it is slightly soiled you may be willing to buy it at a reduced price. The dirtier, shabbier it is, the lower the price you are willing to pay. There is a no returns policy on special offers, everything is “as found”. So you better know you can clean it, repair it and get it to look as it should be before you would ever contemplate buying.
So would you as a GM for any other team pay top dollar for soiled goods? It isn’t the price we put on his ticket, it is the price that others are willing to pay that counts in all this.
IF the offer ever comes to the table we should snatch the Jets hands off. There is a significant and instant upgrade to the D. Harris is good, VERY good. In addition we get decent round picks and as you so rightly point out, we don’t have to worry about him any more.
I have so many friends some I haven't even used yet
by BlobTheMagnificent on Sep 3, 2009 3:20 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, I think we all understand he is damaged goods at this point. Hence, the reason most of us don’t want to trade him or think we can get proper value for his talent in a trade…
by aLuffabo on Sep 3, 2009 11:20 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
BMarsh is working out with Rod Smith
I read where BMarsh reached out and asked Rod Smith to help him and now the two are working out together during the suspension. Smith is mentoring him as well, of course. If this is true than we may need to hold onto BMarsh and see if it works out. Also heard if we franchise him next year then a 1st and 3rd are required to sign him away in free agency. Let’s keep him .. I think the offense will be very strong with him. Just a thought.
by SouthBroncs on Sep 2, 2009 9:44 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, i have to agree with you.
If there is no labor agreement reached, then we will have him as a restricted FA. But eveb if an agreement is reached, we could franchise hm and get a 1st and a 3rd. But do we really want to go through all this drama again next year. Wow, alot of decisions
by Calibroncoboy on Sep 2, 2009 9:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tough decision
But if he’s getting the message now after the suspension and is seriously hanging with Rod Smith- I think we can afford to be patient. I mean can you imagine a focused BMarsh … living up to the nickname “the Beast” ? Our O could be tough to stop- Moreno, Marshall, Royal, Hillis, Graham, Sheffler and …I’m going to say it … Orton? Thoughts?
by SouthBroncs on Sep 2, 2009 9:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I think the benefits would outweigh the costs (if and a big if he has learned his lesson). No matter how you look at it he adds another dimension to the team. He forces the D to double team him leaving others open. Imagine him not around. Royal is not going to surprise anyone this yeat. Without Marshall who draws the double teams?
by T.Dot_Bronco on Sep 2, 2009 9:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
they stopped double teaming Bmarsh last year
and it may have been purely about his hip and the lack of feeling in his forearm, but I remember the SD corneres were practically laughing about it when asked if they would consider doubling marshall for the last game of hte year. Out of the question was their answer.
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 11:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
if that is the case
then that deflates the elite receiver who opens up the field.
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
he was hurt
Marshall is ELITE when he’s healthy. Cromartie is a sack of shiv who had one good year.
by _Atwater27 on Sep 2, 2009 11:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
he always seems to be hurt
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like that Idea
I don’t know anything about Harris and I’m sure he’s a fine player who could have an impact on D. However if (and only if) it’s true that Marshall is with Smith again then I’d see how it plays out. Smith’s influence could only be a positive thing. And like SouthBroncs says we could let someone else try and sign him as a restricted FA and reap the rewards. The potential of a productive Marshall and draft picks outweighs Harris surely.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Sep 2, 2009 9:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd love to feel that way too
But Smith isn’t going to stick with this guy forever, and being on the same team wasn’t even enough time to have a lasting impact.
I still think we’d get screwed in the long run by hanging on to BMarsh past deals like this one.
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 9:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smokescreen...
Marshall saw how fans and media alike responded to news of Eddie Royal working out with Smith. Since Marshall’s a diva and doesn’t want to be one-upped, he’s doing it, too,
by God Elway on Sep 2, 2009 10:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the few people that say no to this
I think Spencer Larsen can fill this role if Davis is not up for it and want to see him on the field.
Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.
by TJ Johnson on Sep 2, 2009 9:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha
I just finished watching the Big Lebowski
by T.Dot_Bronco on Sep 2, 2009 9:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, racially, he's pretty cool, huh?
..ha, don’t get me started on the quotes!!
Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.
by TJ Johnson on Sep 2, 2009 9:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
something tells me
we would be up ALL freakin night. ; )
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Sep 2, 2009 9:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, well, that's like, you know, your opinion, man ;-)
Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.
by TJ Johnson on Sep 2, 2009 9:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
obviously you’re not a golfer
[there are so many you just cant say on this site =)]
A truth can only be expressed and enveloped in words if it is one-sided. Everything that is thought and expressed in words is one-sided, only half the truth; it all lacks totality, completeness, unity.
by Todd Jewell on Sep 2, 2009 10:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
careful with the quotes man there is a beverage here
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jesus Christ man
Jou got that right
by T.Dot_Bronco on Sep 2, 2009 10:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
or how bout
“That wide receiver really tied the offense together”
or
Dawkins to Marshall: "You have got to buck up, man. You cannot drag this negative energy in to the tournament! "
Good times
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marshall you are out of your element here
by T.Dot_Bronco on Sep 2, 2009 10:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
"You got the wrong guy man, I am the Dude!"
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Marmot
Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.
by TJ Johnson on Sep 2, 2009 10:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Jets are prepared to make a generous offer to you to act as courier, once we get instructions for the money.
He believes the culprits(Marshall) might be the very people who, uh, soiled your rug(Locker Room), and you are in a unique position to confirm or disconfirm that suspicion.
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What are you, a effing park ranger now?
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Sep 3, 2009 12:00 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marshall, I love you, but sooner or later, you're going to have to face the fact you're a god**** moron.
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 3, 2009 12:02 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Way out west
there was this fella I wanna tell ya about. Goes by the name of Brandon Marshall. At least that was the handle his lovin’ parents gave him, but he never had much use for it himself. See this Marshall, he called himself “The Beast.” Now, “Beast” — there’s a name no man would self apply where I come from.
But then there was a lot about The Beast that didn’t make a whole lot of sense. And a lot about where he lived, likewise. But then again, maybe that’s why I found the place so darned interestin’. See, they call Denver the “Mile High City”; but I checked it myself with a couple thousand tape measures stuck together with Elmer’s glue, and I didn’t find it to be that, exactly. But I’ll allow it as there are some nice folks there.
‘Course I ain’t never been to London, and I ain’t never seen France. And I ain’t never seen no queen in her damned undies, so the feller says. But I’ll tell you what – after seeing Denver, and this here story I’m about to unfold, well, I guess I seen somethin’ every bit as stupefyin’ as you’d seen in any of them other places. And in English, too. So I can die with a smile on my face, without feelin’ like the good Lord gypped me.
Now this here story I’m about to unfold took place in the early ‘00s, just about the time of our invasion of Saddam and the Eye Raqis. I only mention it because sometimes there’s a man — I won’t say a hero, ‘cause, what’s a hero? Sometimes, there’s a man. And I’m talkin’ about The Beast here – The Beast from Denver. Sometimes, there’s a man… well, he’s the man punts balls away from ball boys. He sits right in there. And that’s The Beast. The Beast, from Denver. And even if he’s a disgruntled man … And The Beast was most certainly that — quite possibly the disgruntledest in all of Denver County, which would place him high in the runnin’ for disgruntledest worldwide. Sometimes there’s a man, .. sometimes there’s a man…
Well, I lost my train of thought here…
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Sep 3, 2009 12:16 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Stupefyin Jones musta done her thang on yer haid
(Lil Abner obscure movie)
by Endzone on Sep 3, 2009 12:21 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Marshall doesn't abide.
;-)
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Sep 3, 2009 5:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pundits!?! F*** me.
I mean say what you like about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude. At least it’s an ethos.
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Sep 2, 2009 11:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
They're Nihlists dude
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
THE WORLD DOES NOT STOP AND START AT YOUR CONVIENIENCE MARSHALL!
Lady, you want me to answer you if this old airplane is safe to fly? Just how in the world do you think it got to be this old?
— Anon
Both optimists and pessimists contribute to the society. The optimist invents the aeroplane, the pessimist the parachute.
— George Bernard Shaw
by Choochoobonewagon on Sep 3, 2009 2:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I always miss the quote parties
I’m like a child that wanders into a movie…
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
by grind_core on Sep 3, 2009 10:06 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
NO
I’d rather have Andra Davis be backing up Spencer Larsen than getting rid of Marshall for Harris.
by CombatChuk on Sep 2, 2009 9:50 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Does anyone know what draft picks we currently have for next year?
by Calibroncoboy on Sep 2, 2009 9:52 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Harris plus a 3rd round pick is enough
BMarsh is an elite player. Harris seems like a solid young defensive player, but the impact to the team is greater with BMarsh.
I would take Harris plus a second and a third/ or forth round pick. Otherwise keep BMarsh. The CBA is not going to get renewed which would allow us to keep him again next year on the cheap OR if he signed away get a 1st & 3rd round pick.
The relative value just doesn’t seem equal to me. Plus with our injuries we have WR depth issues now.
by DBronx777 on Sep 2, 2009 9:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
true, we are in a semi serious Wr shortage and if if the players keep dropping like flies like on sunday, we may really need him.
Just think, if Eddie goes down……..
by Calibroncoboy on Sep 2, 2009 9:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok not a serious shortage but just saying what could happen
by Calibroncoboy on Sep 2, 2009 10:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
DUDE!
Don’t jinx it!! :) I’m not superstitious, really I’m not!
by BroncosBassist on Sep 3, 2009 7:06 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Eddie Royal goes down we are "Royally" screwed
Yeah, I apologize for that but I couldn’t resist.
There is no doubt Andre Davis is not the ideal ILB. He is a serious liability in pass coverage and he can no longer cover sideline to sideline.
My question is would we be better off with BMarsh and replacing Davis with Woodyard or Larsen???
In my opinion if we would insert talent through our depth at ILB and keep BMarsh we would be a better team versus the potential trade. What do you all think?
by DBronx777 on Sep 2, 2009 10:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Harris isn't getting the credit he deserves
He is VERY good, and his production (and consistency) is equal to or better than Brandon’s. But he is a defensive player, so that isn’t as sexy as WR, and he falls off the map.
To me Harris and Bmarsh are at least equal on the football field, and Harris has infinitely better character off. They both have seen some injuries of late, so I think that offsets.
When you figure we are only running two LB, both of the ILB somatotype until the OLBs gel (per Hoosier’s earlier post), it makes senmse to upgrade those 2 LBs as high as you can get them. Brandon on the other hand is part of a 3 and 4 wide base personnel: more WRs on the field at a time (including great receivers like Hillis and Knowshon running routes, and SAcheffler who has the skills of a WR) means that Marshall has less of an effect than 1 of 2 LBs. If we were totally switched over to a 3-4, the argument would be closer, but I still think it would be in favor of upgrading the LBs…
Not sexy, but it makes sense.
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:37 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Those were my thoughts as well Styg.
Seems like the ILBs in a 5-2 need to be VERY good. Harris sounds like he could be a significant upgrade (based on some very recent research). I love Andra Davis off the field, but I’m not sold on it yet.
by NedBronco on Sep 2, 2009 11:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Davis is a good player against the run
But he is a liability in pass coverage and sideline to sideline persuit.
by DBronx777 on Sep 2, 2009 11:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Situational player...
Davis would be very good in a situational role for obvious running situations, but Harris sounds like a more complete player, and certainly better in passing situations
by Timimus on Sep 2, 2009 11:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was my thinking when I heard the news
I had a feeling a lot of Broncos fans would underrate Harris and be opposed to it. With Harris and DJ, we’d have one of the best ILB tandems amongst the 3-4 or 5-2 or whatever teams in the league.
Meanwhile, we WOULD have one of the best 1-2 receiving tandems in the league, but that assumption is LACED and LOADED with ifs.
I would trade Marsh for Harris straight up.
by RockyMountainHigh on Sep 3, 2009 1:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
See my comment in HT's thread
Re: really needing athletic freaks of nature for ILB if you want to succeed with the 5-2 as your base defense. I’m not sure that DJ and Harris qualify as freaks, but they’re pretty close. I’d take that upgrade, and I think it instantly makes our defense more effective.
by BroncosBassist on Sep 3, 2009 7:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Time to boot up madden
And see the difference…… :P Then again I have taken the bronco’s to 4 consecutive SB’s with mostly the same roster, so who knows.
Overall, I don’t think Marshall is enough of a playmaker to be worth his baggage, and the attitude suggests that even if he was, he wouldn’t do it for the Broncos. We have good depth at WR, and while some of you out there (and you know who you are ;) ;) nudge nudge) complain about the short dink and dunk offense we have seen so far, I firmly believe that we have all the talent we need to win games using short-mid range throws with a strong running game(which we all saw on Sunday Night).
Andra Davis is a stop gap, Harris provides known production, whereas BM is at a point where I don’t think anyone truly knows what sort of production we will get out of him this year after his pouting episodes.
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 9:56 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Mixed feelings
because on the one hand I’d rather keep Marshall IF he’s going to end up playing, because the offense could really use him (again, IF he plays and knows what he’s doing re the playbook). on the other hand, even if he stays with Broncos now and plays, you get the sense that the odds of him being re-signed and brought back long term after this season are slim in which case they’d get nothing for losing him. They could use a good player plus a draft pick. So… this is why I’m torn.
I like hearing he’s working with Rod Smith. I’d rather they keep him and get some good games out of him, so I’m leaning towards “no.”
But I think this deal would be about as good as they could get right now and would rid them of a headache.
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Sep 2, 2009 9:59 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Voted no
in the pole because I want a 1st or 2nd pick for any trade we do with Marshall even if we also get a starter on defense for him. If Marshall gets his act together and goes to a team with a good qb like the Jets have in Sanchez, he will continue to be a top 5 wide receiver for the next several seasons and Harris and a 3rd rounder wouldn’t be enough in return for Marshall.
by broncorob on Sep 2, 2009 9:59 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Jumping from maybe a Top-20 WR
to Top-5 WR with a rookie QB would be impressive.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 10:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Check the fanshots....
apparantly Marshall is on his way to NY
by T.Dot_Bronco on Sep 2, 2009 9:59 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
then i am so done with this guy.
Greedy, needy, selfish me-first players can get out of here. And this is just my personal opinion, but the guy had more balls thrown to him than any other reciever in the past 2 years, so he better have high, gaudy stats. But I think his catch percentage is something like 58%, so yeah….. no thanks.
Hope he enjoys working with a rookie QB.
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Close — I'm pretty sure it's 57%
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Sep 3, 2009 6:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
not sure I trust that one
Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.
by TJ Johnson on Sep 2, 2009 10:04 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
East Coast bias
…I think a lot of the rumors are the east coast media trying to get a great player to the Jets so they can brag about them and trash on the Broncos. I think shipping BMarsh off hurts in the short and perhaps long term and the MSM will be talking about how the Broncos let both Cutler and BMarsh get away in just a few months. Heard one guy on ESPN (Vetter?) tonight claim we had to make the deal because we don’t have a pick in the 1st round next year. Typically misinformed. Also I just can’t see McD stating that no talks are underway if they truly were- in light of the “trust” issues that were around during the Cutler saga. Nerve wracking times. Nerve wracking. :-)
by SouthBroncs on Sep 2, 2009 10:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Voted no.
But only because I’m vindictive and I want to see his ass sit all season long.
I thought you knew that algebra was all razzamatazz. A Globetrotter always saves the good algebra for the final minutes.
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Sep 2, 2009 10:03 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Keep in mind this is what MCD said just HOURS ago after practice
“There are no discussions whatsoever taking place between the Denver Broncos and any team in the National Football League regarding Brandon Marshall. We are looking forward to having Brandon back on the sixth of September and starting our preparation for Cincinnati with him.”
But we know how he said something similar in the “Other” situation we had……..and we know how that ended
by Calibroncoboy on Sep 2, 2009 10:03 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
WHAT A PREDICAMENT!!!
BMarsh has for all intents & purposes has tied the hands of all parties involved. How can Bowlen possibly give him the contract he THINKS!!!!!! he is worth with the off the field issues. Maybe I am a glass half full kind of guy but it’s the balls that he has dropped over the last few years that have concerned me the most (go figure). I would love to see Spencer get a shot!! When given the opportunity he seems like he is laying the wood to somebody.
by Terry8377 on Sep 2, 2009 10:04 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I voted no
Just because my initial thoughts on preseason have been that the defense has come a long way from last year and the offense struggles at times.
I think Marshall might help the O more than Harris would help the D, but after reading all the comments, I don’t know if I would’ve voted the same.
It seems like a wash now. The O can get by without Marshall, but he would surely make them better. The D can get by without Harris, but he would make them better too.
Also, keep in mind, that the Broncos still hold all the cards. If they don’t get exactly what they want now they can keep him. If theres no CBA by the end of the season, he’s a restricted free agent and he’s still ours. If there is a CBA, he becomes unrestricted but we could franchise him which would ensure we get at least a 1 and 3 for him.
by jwkcsu on Sep 2, 2009 10:07 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I find this article troubling at best!!!
What is going on in Denver? The Coach, the “Boss” says unequivocally in his interview on Denverbroncos.com Wednesday that “there are absolutely no discussions what so ever” with other teams concerning Marshall and trades talk (3:26 – 3:40) and now your saying the new head coach is a bald face liar?!!! Wow this isn’t good news period!!! I don’t care if Marshall is traded for a couple of beans that turn into a beanstalk but a head coach bald face lying, hmmmm maybe the Cutler thing isn’t everything we have been told. Maybe there is more to the story. What the heck is going on? Can’t we all just get on the same page? Losing Cutler while painful is done losing another pro-bowl player is something that should be looked at seriously. I’m on board for a little bit of diplomacy. OK I don’t agree with the way Marshall has been acting but all of a sudden I’m not 100% sure about HCMcD anymore either. Not that I am a hater, I just don’t understand…
"even a stopped clock is right twice a day" Yosemite Sam
by lovewatchinthegame on Sep 2, 2009 10:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
that was wednesday.
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh God I thought it was still Wednesday...
I gotta knock off on the box wine!!!
"even a stopped clock is right twice a day" Yosemite Sam
by lovewatchinthegame on Sep 2, 2009 10:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cheap champagne I dig
but the cheap wine is really a buyer beware scenario!!
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cheap wine
just leaves more money for shots later
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
jsut to be clear, it is still wednesday right?
I got lost in my own sarcasm… and I’m notorious for not knowing what day it is…. :(
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just ran my mouse over the clock on the bottom left of my screen and it says Wednesday
So I think it is!
"even a stopped clock is right twice a day" Yosemite Sam
by lovewatchinthegame on Sep 2, 2009 10:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
McD wasn't lying
Adam Schefter said that sources within the Broncos said that they’d have to get Harris and a pick for Marshall- but he also said that “there are no active discussions right now.”
McD never said that Marshall wouldn’t get traded no matter what- just that they hadn’t talked to any teams.
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Sep 2, 2009 10:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
how could there have been active discussion "right now"?
Technically, he was out on the practice field talking to the media when he said it! Just a point in time, ya know? ; )
Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.
by broncosmontana on Sep 2, 2009 10:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
See! It wasn't a lie!
I am convinced McD loves to mess with the media and play word games. And as a lover of word games, I think it is hilarious
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
McD didn't make the active discussion statment- that was Schefter
McD said that they hadn’t talked to any other teams regarding Marshall- and Schefter suggests that they still haven’t talked to the Jets.
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Sep 2, 2009 10:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmmm I just re-read the post
It distinctly said that the Broncos let the Jets know that if they want Marshall it has to include this that and the other…that sounds like a discussion.
"even a stopped clock is right twice a day" Yosemite Sam
by lovewatchinthegame on Sep 2, 2009 10:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
so?
this all came out this evening- because it happened this evening. This afternoon, McD said the Broncos hadn’t talked to other teams regarding Marshall, not that they wouldn’t.
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Sep 2, 2009 10:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Watch the video!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
he was unequivocal!!! Absolute,,, he added that they had every intention to game plan for Cinci with him… come on when you watch that, what is he saying? You are days away from your first game of the season, and you say that… then shop him around the minute you hit your office?? is this how it was with Cutler? OH yah Cut baby your our man one minute and then 30 minutes later he’s being shopped? What is going on? Either it is one way or the other and honestly I for one like Honestly maybe for some of you honesty takes a back seat to winning, for me it doesn’t!!! Ethics mean more to me than W’s or L’s sorry if I’m old fashioned…I just have come to expect more from someone who has put himself in a position to be a role model for my 5 year old who loves football too… what message is HCMcD sending when he plays these kinds of games ??? Well at least the ones you are alluding to…
"even a stopped clock is right twice a day" Yosemite Sam
by lovewatchinthegame on Sep 2, 2009 10:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe Xander's told him waht kind of deal he wanted to toss out there?
and it was better than anything McDaniel’s ahd expected us to be able to demand? It sure as heck beats what I was expecting we would ask for…
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can see that, that would be a smart business move
But either way it’s still important for McDaniel to be honest, he could say “currently we have not been tendered an offer we feel is in the best interest of the team” or “no comment” but he blatantly said “no discussions WHAT SO EVER, and we are looking forward to blah blah blah” it is either a case of him not being in touch with upper management (which is a scary thought) or he just plain old threw out a little white lie(which is even more scary as a dad of a 5 year old who could idolize such a person as McDaniel not that I think Marshall right now is a first class example either) at any rate when you watch the video and then 2 minutes later switch over to the only other Bronco site you visit and read that headline it is a little disturbing…
"even a stopped clock is right twice a day" Yosemite Sam
by lovewatchinthegame on Sep 2, 2009 10:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
we might possibly have a case of
a real instance of Xander’s claim to some of the organizational “power,” insofar as McD may have been absolutely sure that the team was better off sitting on Marshall for now,a nd Xander’s went around him and dreamed up this excellent deal? The Jets acquired Scott int eh offseson, and Harris missed minicamps with a cut to his face, so the situation is ripe to talk the Jets out of one of the best young defensive players in the league…
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 11:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
not to mention that Denver might drop the accusations
of tampering for the Jets, if they follow through with the trade… ballsy,a nd I have no idea how much veracity that claim has, but it is a thought…
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 11:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting... I like the way you think
Any type of leverage that can be used to get a better deal should be considered
by DBronx777 on Sep 2, 2009 11:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This pleases me!!!!
I’m getting that warm feeling back again. It really could be that simple!!! And in a way, very healthy for the Broncos…
"even a stopped clock is right twice a day" Yosemite Sam
by lovewatchinthegame on Sep 2, 2009 11:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the same logic
Doesn’t having BM on the team, having down what he has done (and been accused of doing), provide a bad influence to young kids?
Your thoughts?
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Certainly two wrongs don't make a right
and right now I would personally bench Marshall until he was 100,000% committed to helping the team but hmmmm I don’t know this concerns me….how can this affect the credibility of McDaniel with the rest of the team. Say one thing one minute and then BAM 2 hours later 180 degree turn around? What if the trade talks came up about Champ? Or DJ? Or Royal? I’m sure they all feel 100% sure about there jobs… but then again do they? I know that Cutler’s actions contributed to his ouster but from Bowlen’s perspective McDaniel wasn’t 100% without blame, now it’s Marshall… again I know that he has been a butthead but at what point does McDaniel take some responsibility for getting the job done with what he’s got? We aren’t there everyday so we don’t really know but time will tell. Time will tell
"even a stopped clock is right twice a day" Yosemite Sam
by lovewatchinthegame on Sep 2, 2009 11:00 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
with any luck a reporter will ask him about it
then we’ll get to parse his answer…
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 11:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
me thinks with a wee bit more than... any... luck!!!
I am just dreaming about watching that ball floating in the air being driven toward the kick returner on the 13th!!!!
"even a stopped clock is right twice a day" Yosemite Sam
by lovewatchinthegame on Sep 2, 2009 11:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think there is a difference between what is said in public
and what is said in the locker room. I think we have a very strong case of not knowing all of the facts. I don’t get the impression from any of the players I respect on the team (Royal, Hillis, Dawkins, etc) that they see him as two faced or a liar. Instead I get the impression that he is playing a media game.
Just a thought tho, ideally I would love for BM to grow up, but personally the man disgusts me as a person, and I would get rid of him and make an example of him. Honestly it seems to me that this team had 2 major diva’s (Cutler and BM) and they are both pushing against the new regime, and kicking and screaming as they go
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have you ever played a game called...
Poker?
by _Atwater27 on Sep 2, 2009 11:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What is he supposed to say?
Yes, we are having conversations…Then it all falls through. Not to mention value drops. ALL TEAMS DO THIS. Who is he ‘lying’ to? Us, the media, so what? Just remember, ALWAYS REMEMBER, it was BRANDON MARSHALL that wants out. Never forget that.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Sep 3, 2009 7:33 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just feels to me like if we’re going to get rid of Marshall, we should be looking for a strong QB in the Trade. Our defense randomly doens’t seem like the worst of our problems at the moment. Maybe we should hit up the Viks for TJackson???
by SkiTown14ers on Sep 2, 2009 10:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I think we've already got our QB for the future
Brandstater has all the tools.
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:11 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, yes a thousand times YES!
Marshall is little more than drama and headaches at this point. David Harris is one of the top 3 ILBs for a 3-4 system in the entire league (I would put Scott and Meyo ahead of him…but his star is rising fast).
The upgrade on defense would be a full magnitude greater than the downgrade on offense, of that I have no doubt at all. Harris is a tackling machine, a solid hitter who can drop into coverage in a pinch, but who excels at stopping the run. He is faster than any of our current SLBs, but would clock at around a 4.5 or so at best, so still not a blazer. OF course, if you’ve been paying attention to MHRU, you know that his job won’t be to run sideline to sideline. He is very strong and very physical, and was always good at stacking and shedding at Michigan. he was worth every iota of the second rounder the Jets spent on him (47th overall). I would LOVE to see this guy playing next to DJ, the versatility of our base formation just doubled (if we get him!)
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:13 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of tackling machine
I just read that he had 24 tackles in week nine! last season.
I could not find much more on this guy, but that is staggering.
Lady, you want me to answer you if this old airplane is safe to fly? Just how in the world do you think it got to be this old?
— Anon
Both optimists and pessimists contribute to the society. The optimist invents the aeroplane, the pessimist the parachute.
— George Bernard Shaw
by Choochoobonewagon on Sep 3, 2009 3:18 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hey guy
this guy is good line back and young. he the compete player. This guy look real mean too. If we get this guy and third round that is cool cause then you can use third round for ammonation in draft. if this guy we get then dj willam elvis dumvile and what if robet ayer become the defence technical guy. that would be so cool. they all so young too and dj willam in prime. you dont need any line backs then yes. the woodard the larsen the davis is depth too guy,
what ever guy this guy stuff you run like no body busness and he make sack and cover too this guy is cool I hope it true. bandon marshall is could even be all done if he go crazy again even.
I is fan of the Denver
by Horvil Tiki on Sep 2, 2009 10:13 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
good to see you Horvil!
How is Dublinski?
fader nation is a conquered nation
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!
by mdierk on Sep 2, 2009 10:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
thnaks guy
he is ok I guess I still think he steal dog but what ever he back now so that is cool. I wonder if brandstated will do good tomorrow it foul that game not on tv.
I try not to get to excite of this deal cause who know but it would be cool. we loose a little fire power on offence though guy but this guy is real good guy too and marshall act corny and dont want to be the denver.
I is fan of the Denver
by Horvil Tiki on Sep 2, 2009 10:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
not to rub it in....
the game is on TV where I live
fader nation is a conquered nation
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!
by mdierk on Sep 2, 2009 10:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok we loose a lot of fire power but what ever marshall is corny and trouble all the time guy.
I is fan of the Denver
by Horvil Tiki on Sep 2, 2009 10:18 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
You tell 'em Horvil!
Another third rounder gives us more ammo to grab a second first rounder next season too.
Just talkin’ to McG there. ;-)
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
According to the fan the deal is as good as done! Marshall was seen boarding a plane for NY and the trade will be done tommorow
by BGBronco on Sep 2, 2009 10:15 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
PATSWEST
You con take the Patriot out of New England, but you Can’t take the Belichick out of the Patriot. I guess I feel more comfortable with the guy if he wasn’t a complete clone of his mentor. At least on the surface anyway!!
by Terry8377 on Sep 2, 2009 10:16 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
say what you will
but his mento has 3 rings
by T.Dot_Bronco on Sep 2, 2009 10:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I HEAR YOU
It just seems like his kids crash & burn but we will see.
by Terry8377 on Sep 2, 2009 10:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
his other kids weren't all they were cracked up to be
and obviously the jury is still out on McD. But the others didn’t accomplish as much as he did as a coordinator. Weiss was overrated as was Crennel. Mangini is a putzo.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Sep 2, 2009 10:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now if the trade is for Harris AND a first round pick, then pull the trigger and get it done
Per this fanpost this is what the Broncos are asking for…
We will even throw in Andre Davis to replace Harris for the NYJ.
If this is the deal then I would be happy. Anything significantly less and the Broncos will get hammered in the media (per usual – but i don’t know how much more I can take from those MSM clowns).
by DBronx777 on Sep 2, 2009 10:17 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Ok just hear me out.
What if and this a HUGE what if.. Coach Jedi and BMarsh had this all worked out so the rest of the NFL thinks our team is in turmoil. This way they don’t really take us serious and then we come out 5-0 before the fluke comment change to watch out for Denver.. TEHn on to winning the rest. He would need a little advantage until his system is gelin. And all this time, in a secret base, Bmarsh is practicing with the !st team. I know it sounds crazy But Both are young and would be fun as a new team… Just saying maybe, I like the idea of our new young coach is fun and creative..
GO BRONCOS
For the love of the animals. 24
by Earthtiger24 on Sep 2, 2009 10:24 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I had said this last week..
until the practice video came out. I call it the ’Randy Moss Scenario" from a couple years ago when Moss seemed unhappy in New England. All he did was score 22 TDs. The video changed all that for me…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
by John Bena on Sep 3, 2009 7:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harris 117 tackles asa rookie
last year he was well on his way to duplicating those numbers when he tore a groin muscle in the KC game in October. Without that tear (and subsequent surgery) we would have got to see him when the Jets played the Broncos. He leaves a memorable impression on his opponents…
I also read that he broke his ankle int eh final game of 2008…didn’t know about that… most recently he got hit int he outh by a helmet (errant punt return player) and had to get stitches for that…he might even have an intimidating facial scar! He leaves a memorable impression on his opponents…
So far he has been awesome in preseason and has an INT to set up a TD. he also led the Jets in sacks his rookie year…nothing wrong with that. I want!
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:25 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
A Denver Defense with players that leave a memorable impression on opponents....
Hard to imagine such a world after last years D
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Orange Crush
I think Shanny was so enamored with shut down corners and 4.3 speed he forgot about the beef up front. Although a big ugly right in the middle is my wish a tackling monster like Harris would work as well. DO IT!!!!!!!
by Terry8377 on Sep 2, 2009 10:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
All the members of the Bronco’s D need to rewatch Conan the Barbarian
Mongol Leader: “Conan what is best in life?”
Conan: “Crush your enemies, see them driven before you and hear the lamentations of the women”
For our purposes we could swap “lamentations of the women” for turnovers, forced fumbles and scared offenses
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:36 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Way to work in a Conan The Barbarian reference
There just isn’t enough time in the day for this!
Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.
by TJ Johnson on Sep 2, 2009 10:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lol, i love that movie
another way to look at the BM situation, if he continues to pout we can put him on the Wheel of Death and have him push it till he is strong and stoic
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great flick!
I was trying to think of a follow-up quote, but had to laugh at the complete lack of quotable quotes in that movie. Not a lot of talking, but still a great one. ; )
by NedBronco on Sep 2, 2009 11:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
other great quotes include:
“Enough time for the earth in the grave!”
“You must learn its discipline. For no one – no one in this world can you trust. Not men, not women, not beasts. [Points to sword] This you can trust. "
“Grant me revenge! And if you do not listen, then to HELL with you! "
“Do you want to live forever?”
“What daring! What outrageousness! What insolence! What arrogance!… I salute you. "
Course….those are harder to work into a quote regarding Denver’s D. Now i gotta watch that movie again tonight!
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
for some reason I modified one for nfl
The riddle… of Steelers?
Steelers isn’t strong, boy, flesh is stronger!
by McgarnagleDB on Sep 3, 2009 12:16 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
conan barbariat
was best movie ever guy. i still wish bronco theme song was conan barbariat theme song from when in tunnel. It would be if I still play nfl2k5. Like the dawkin fly out all crazy and it conan barbariant theme song. it have so much bass it like ruin you subwoofer guy. why no one ever can make sound like that any more? it like alien make that song.
I is fan of the Denver
by Horvil Tiki on Sep 3, 2009 4:27 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Oh, man I forgot about that injury for my post below.
Either way Harris is still a damn good linebacker.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 10:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
harris learning defense
Who’s to say that Harris would be able to pick up the Defense any faster than Marshall would be able to pick up the offense.
by broncoboy326 on Sep 2, 2009 10:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
NO!
Have you all forgotten how explosive The Beast is with the ball in his hands?! The first guy never tackles him. Our D already looks much improved, and the offense looks to me to be on track, but having Marshall is a HUGE difference maker. A good linebacker is nice, but just does not have the impact on the outcome of the game that 15 can. Please, please keep BMarsh or at least get more for him than a player and a 3rd!
by dabriza on Sep 2, 2009 10:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
He is THE BEAST!
But what if he decides to, I don’t know, be HIMSELF again, and gets arrested after game 4?
Doesn’t do us much good at that point…
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I may be naive
but I really do think he has finally learned his lesson. He isn’t pacman and actually sees what he has to lose. He knows that if he wants his $$$ he needs to keep his ducks in a row and do a great job on the field, and I think that is motivation enough for him.
by dabriza on Sep 2, 2009 10:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not naive
I totally see where you’re coming from.
I just don’t trust the guy anymore….
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It may just be
That he is one of the only guys that truly excite me on the team anymore. Hillis is awesome too, but Eddie, as much as I love him, just is not as fun to watch as Marshall is. I am still in this for the entertainment value too, and nobody on the team has it like Marshall does. He sells tickets.
by dabriza on Sep 2, 2009 10:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Royal
is about to excite Broncos fans far more than Marshall has to date.
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes for 3 reasons
1) David Harris has been the NY Jets best LB for the past two years including his rookie year, amassing 202 tackles and 6.5 sacks. However, last year he did take a step back, only 75 tackles and one sack. Then again they did add Calvin Pace and Kris Jenkins so he didn’t shoulder the load by himself. This year they added Bart Scott. But Harris is young, athletic, run-stopper who can cover the TE in the middle of the field, in addition, to being a decent pass rusher. If you can add a young, proven, impact defender to a young defense for a malcontent, I’d say that’s a win.
2) The contract Guru points out that Marshall will want. 7yrs/$50million. That’s a contract for the Top WRs in the game. Guess what? B-Marsh is not one of the top WRs in the game. Yeah I said it. You can throw all the accumulated numbers at me that you want, but over the past two year Marshall has only caught about 55% of the balls thrown to him. Sounds good, until you look at the fact Larry Fitzgerald caught 72%. Andre Johnson caught 68%. That’s elite. You damn well better put up 205 catches when you’ve been target 400+ times in a season.
He’s never been Top-20 in TDs, he’s never been Top-40 in yards per catch. He’s just been targeted a lot. He’s not even a deep threat, therefore, not really a true #1. More like a 1B as a possesion WR. Do you think he’ll run over people more or less once he gets paid? Hmmm.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, my biggest fear this season or next was paying Brandon Marshall, cause he’s just not worth it. Yes he’s talent, but not Andre Johnson or Larry Fitzgerald talented and he has waaaaay to many injury and behavioral issues.
3) I’m sick and tired of these whiny, selfish, divas on the Denver Broncos. Those who think it’s all about them and could care less about the team. I’m tired of it. Most of Colorado is tired of it. The Broncos culture has never been about it. If you’re going to clean it up, clean up all of it.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 10:32 PM MDT reply actions 10 recs
well said Randall
lets bang the Harris drum loud and clear!
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You guys have just about convinced me
My first impression was Harris is solid. From what I’m hearing now he’s as good on defense as Marshall is on offense, especially when you consider his mediocre catch percentage (57%). And if Marshall is a head case at 2 million a year, think what he’ll be at four times that. Finally, it doesn’t matter how good Marshall is if he’s not on the field, and he’s one incident away from that happening even if he does come around. He has too little impulse control to be able to keep his promises.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Sep 3, 2009 7:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Randall
Point 2 almost swung me to your position. Well said, my man! This gets a rec.
Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.
by TJ Johnson on Sep 2, 2009 10:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ruru and I talked about this all the time on ESPN.
He’s got fantastic receiving numbers. Until you dig under the surface and compare them to other elite WRs. His averages just aren’t there. He’s barely Top-20, if that. He puts up big numbers cause he gotten more opportunities than anyone else in the NFL over the last 2 years. It’s as simple as that.
And last year we all should have noticed a sharp decline in the number of people he ran over in favor of jukes and backwards moves that lost more yardage than anything. I shudder to think what might happen once he gets paid.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 10:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Alright trade this guy
…good stuff….it’s the same point I made when I compared 6 other qbs to cutler with the same number of attempts….watch what happens if Philip Rivers gets 600+ attempts…it’s scary, and i hate the chargers
Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.
by TJ Johnson on Sep 2, 2009 11:28 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You probably shouldn't look into Vincent Jackson then either.
Now that’s a #1 WR. Unfortunately :-(
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 12:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Northern Colorado too
I was bummed when Denver didnt’ look his way, even worse that he went to SD.
by _Atwater27 on Sep 3, 2009 12:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah it continues to sting a little.
Hopefully Knowshon makes us feel better since we stole him away from the Chargers.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 12:24 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly on target
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
thank you
for a fantastic post. i concur with EVERYTHING you said.
I always thought Marsh was overrated. Add on top of that a whiny attitude and injury issues, and I think we’d be really lucky to get Harris for him straight up. Forget picks, no need to push our luck. Just go and get one of the best young ILBs in the game, k thx bye.
by RockyMountainHigh on Sep 3, 2009 1:43 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What is happening to this team?!
I cannot believe we are even having this conversation. NO, we should not get rid of Brandon Marshall, and it has nothing to do with him. What kind of message are we sending to veterans like Bailey and Dawkins, who don’t have many good years left and want to win a ring now? That we are making an example of Marshall, and that no one player is above the team? No, the team is saying it’s not interested in winning now, and that it would rather lose with character guys than win games with a few crybabies. You think this off-season was tumultuous? Wait till this season is over, and the floodgates will open. Every player who is able to will leave Denver. Do not make this trade, Broncos!
by xandervan on Sep 2, 2009 10:32 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
One thing to consider
It would be a heck of a lot harder to draft another BMarsh caliber WR than it would be to find a Harris caliber LB- and not just because BMarsh is a better player than Harris. WR’s have a tremendously high washout rate in the early rounds. LB’s, not so much…
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Sep 2, 2009 10:38 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
but here is a question
Does anyone honestly think that BMarsh will stay in Denver if offered a long term deal? Even assuming we keep him via the 2 years of Restricted FA, is he a WR we honestly expect to be a Bronco for the next 10 years? I don’t think so
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is a good point
and outside of sleepers, 2011 will probably be the earliest we will have a strong crop at WR in the draft to select from… But again, I hesitate to think that Marshall is who he is described as. Per Randall’s comment above, his role in our offense may indeed be replaceable.
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:45 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree with the 2011 projection for WRs.
Next year should be pretty good. You’ve got fantastic deep threats like Brandon LaFell (LSU), Damian Williams (USC), and the best, Dez Bryant (OSU). Great slot men like Jordan Shipely (UT) and Golden Tate (ND). Explosive playmakers like Arrelious Benn (UI) and Marshawn Ginyard (Cin). And solid WRs like Erik Decker (UM).
It’s not nearly as great as 2011 when you have truly special talents like Julio Jones and AJ Green eligible for the draft, but it is a solid year. And 2010 is the year of the QB in college football, which, will benefit the TEs and WRs in the country.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 10:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brandon LaFell
could go top ten if this year pans out for him, but none of the other guys will likely push that first round. Agree on QB, it is looking good there, and that is just the Seniors so far. Excellent point.
I think you and I may have something to talk about when I get my draft preview up in the next week or so…
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 11:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh man I disagree big time
Damian Williams, Dez Bryant and Arrelious Benn (along with LaFell) have all looked like first round WRs. Especially, Williams and Bryant. Benn is a less consistent version of Percy Harvin, but someone might take the chance, particularly if Percy makes an good impact this year.
And I’d talk draft prospects with you. I prefer the college game.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 11:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marshall Contract if he doesn't play
I remember reading on here way back in the summer that if he doesn’t play (because of suspension), this year of his contract won’t count, and he’ll have to wait another year before he gets his pay day. If that’s the case, that would seem like serious leverage for him to get his act together. Can someone verify this for me?
by broncoboy326 on Sep 2, 2009 10:39 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
You think a Brandon Marshall with nothing to do for a year
isn’t going to get in trouble? ;-)
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember that playing for the Denver Broncos
isn’t the same thing as playing well
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Sep 2, 2009 10:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome
Good! Get him out of Denver with no QB and no chance of winning. Get him on a team where he has some value where they treat their players with respect and are honest to them instead of trying to uncut them and being force to trade them away. Good Job, Broncos!! Now you have no QB and no WR!! Way to run an organization!
by Shakman on Sep 2, 2009 10:45 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Respect the divas, sounds like a good plan
Should we let the inmates run the asylum next? Maybe let teenagers tell their parents what to do? While we are at it, lets just go for anarchy! The Clash was for it, so lets do it!
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
they tried that with the last administration
by lolcopter on Sep 2, 2009 10:53 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah the Jets are a model franchise
Is Namath still the QB there?
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
But wait!
Don’t you get it? We’re winning with character. That’s what everyone seems to want. Never mind that it will be winning 4 or 5 games.
by xandervan on Sep 2, 2009 10:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't know the regular season had started......
How is the future Dr. Who?
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of which
Anybody here a fan of Muse? Their latest hit sounds totally like the theme song from Dr. Who
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Admission: Never have watched an entire of Dr. Who
but have heard the new Muse song since the radio stations around here play it every 5 minutes, inbetween bouts of Linkin Park. Listening to the radio makes me feel like i should be getting my teenage angst on…..maybe BM needs to lay off the Linkin Park
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dr. Who
was what made my Saturday mornings (10-12 timeframe) as a kid.
But Linkin Park ain’t bad either. ;-)
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Now that I have graduated from College I don’t have to look at the angsting teens singing their songs either!
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
which makes my ears bleeeeeed.
Stupid angst
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Makes for great lyrics though ;-)
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 11:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is that silver linning.
I just wish radio stations would stop playing the same 3 songs over and over and over again. Variety please!
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I want is
a player who SHOWS UP for practices and games and helps the team win. Why are you assuming there’ll be a difference in wins and losses here, if Marshall isn’t even giving a crap? I want character guys who are ALSO good. I agree no one wants good character and bad players. But why are you assuming it’s either/or? Is Brian Dawkins a bad player? Is Knowshon a bad player? I want both.
Marshall if he gets his act together and wants to play on the Broncos, that’s fine by me, he’ll help. But if he’s purely got eyes on a big pay day (which may never come for him at this rate) and some other team, why should I beg him to stay?
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Sep 2, 2009 10:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And how well will he handle being the second-best WR on the team
even if he stays?
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Sep 3, 2009 7:12 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
its tough
No doubt Harris is an upgrade, but what we need is a anchor for the front 7. We need a NT. I’ll would make the trade for Harris and a 1st rd pick.
by NJ Broncos on Sep 2, 2009 10:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
it is
I would rather have a nose but Davis is old, slow and a liability in coverage. With Harris we would have one of the better ILB tandems in the league. I’m hoping that we address the line in next years draft.
by milehighnation on Sep 2, 2009 10:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed. also, fields has done surprisingly well, and baker is showing promise
by lolcopter on Sep 2, 2009 10:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are there a ton of High quality NT's in next years draft?
I have no idea honestly, no sarcasam
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could be...
but Baker could be an all-Pro, seriously.
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we have a ton of young talent on the field right now,
and everything I have seen in the preseason shows that given a few years we could have an outstanding D
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
not a ton
but it is a very good class. If Suh or Cody are really all that, then the possibility of trading up might be there (arm and a leg). But the real benefit is how many good players get driven down into the value portions of the rounds.
I’ll have a post coming up very soon about the 2010 in relation to Denver’s current roster status, and I’ll be talking about next years DT class.
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
thinking about it....
depends on what you mean by “a ton”… :) “Mount” Cody is in this draft, after all…
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 2, 2009 10:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome,
Love your articles, makes me smarter!
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta love watching Alabama's spring game and a 365lb man
take on 2 O-linemen and then sprint to the outside to make a tackle on a stretch play near the sideline.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 11:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also keep an eye on Phil Taylor (Jr.) Baylor Bears.
This kid transfered in from Penn State and though he has character issues all I’ve heard from spring practice is that he’s strong as an ox versus the double team with enough explosiveness to blow it up. 6’4" 355lbs, he could be a good alternative to Terrance Cody with a good season in the Big-12.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 12:07 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ohhhhhhhh
6’4" 355 lbs? Holy crap that’s a huge wall.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 3, 2009 12:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Terrance Cody is 6'5' 365lbs
And I’ve seen the video of him doing a standing backflip; while he was in Community College and weighed 440lbs.
Either of those guys would be a huge addition to the D-line.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 12:19 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
literally huge eh? good gawd 6'5 365 and doing backflips? WHOA
by RockyMountainHigh on Sep 3, 2009 1:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually he was 6'5" 440lbs when he did the backflip.
I might be the only one who is terrified by thought of human athletic enough to do a backflip at that size.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 9:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did the camera cry?
because that’s the makings of a horror film!
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 3, 2009 12:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marshall vs Harris
Marshall is a better wide out than Harris is a LB. Marshall is a top 5 WR. Harris is good not great. Marshall has that potential.
by NJ Broncos on Sep 2, 2009 10:55 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll bet I could scan a list of starting WRs in the NFL
and come up with 20 better than Marshall at this point in time.
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 10:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is because BM
is mid pack based on ALL stats other than catches (as long as you don’t look at %)
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 10:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
I’m sure we all want BM for his talent. He opens up so much for the offense.
by milehighnation on Sep 2, 2009 10:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baker
I like him but he got pushed around vs chi. He needs to show the team something is Thurs.
by NJ Broncos on Sep 2, 2009 10:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Okay
1) Larry Fitzgerald (12 TDs, 14.9 ypc, 72% of balls caught)
2) Andre Johnson (8 TDs, 13.7 ypc, 68% of balls caught)
3) Calvin Johnson (12 TDs, 17.1 ypc)
4) Randy Moss (11 TDs, 14.6 ypc)
5) Greg Jennings (9 TDs, 16.2 ypc)
6) Vincent Jackson (8 TDs, 18.6 ypc)
7) Anquan Boldin (11 TDs, 11.7 ypc)
8) Reggie Wayne (6 TDs, 14.0 ypc)
9) Steve Smith (6 TDs, 18.2 ypc)
10) Roddy White (7 TDs, 15.7 ypc)
11) Terrell Owens (10 TDs, 15.2 ypc)
12) Marques Colston (5 TDs, 16.2 ypc; hurt last year for 5 games)
13) Lee Evans (3 TDs, 16.1 ypc)
14) Hines Ward (7 TDs, 12.9 ypc)
15) Bernard Berrian (7 TDs, 20.1 ypc; underrated due to dearth of QB talent in career)
16) Santonio Holmes (6 TD, 13.2 ypc)
17) Derrick Mason ( 5 TDs, 13.0 ypc)
18) Dewayne Bowe (7 TDs, 11.9 ypc, good #s despite dearth of QB talent)
19) TJ Houshmanzedah (4 TDs, 9.8 ypc, poor #s due to QB, ’07 – 12 TDs, 10.2 ypc)
20) Wes Welker (3 TDs, 10.5 ypc)
21) Brandon Marshall (5 TDs, 12.2 ypc)
Notice possesion WRs start showing up around #18. Cause WRs who make explosive plays on a consistent basis are more valuable on the edge.
It should continue to be noted that only one player on this list was targeted 400+ times over the last 2 seasons. Guess who? Gee and it’s such a mystery why he has sooo many catches. Has nothing to do with opportunities does it? And don’t tell it’s because he’s “open”. He is a sloppy route runner who benefits from tremendous size. Unless being 6’6" (yes he really is) isn’t helpful against 5’10" CBs
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 11:42 PM MDT up reply actions 5 recs
ZING!
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 2, 2009 11:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did I mention he was also Top-5 in drops?
Him and Braylon Edwards were the top 2 if my memory serves me right.
Then again it’s late, but I know he was up there.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 12:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
the only player in that top 20
who I wouldn’t trade marsh for straight up is Derrick Mason, and that’s only because he’s gonna retire next year or the year after.
by RockyMountainHigh on Sep 3, 2009 1:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Marshall is not even the best receiver on his own team
Marshall: 57% of targeted passes. Royal: 71%.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Sep 3, 2009 7:19 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ding, ding, ding
It’s not how much your targeted, it’s what you do with the opportunities.
If this were a high school class Marshall would fail at catching passes.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 9:22 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Question for all
Would you rather have a dominant defense or offense
by milehighnation on Sep 2, 2009 11:01 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Defense
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is ridiculous
Now Brandon Marshall is not even an elite receiver. Catches, yardage…what meaningless stats. You’re right. Champ Bailey is not an elite corner either. Let’s trade him, too.
by xandervan on Sep 2, 2009 11:01 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Marshall was just a possession receiver...
… a few weeks ago, when we discussed this in depth, who did catch a lot of balls, but rarely broke away for big gains. A good player, but not essential.
And we still don’t know about the health of his hip, especially long-term.
I’d say, take the deal. Marshall has too much baggage here. A good, young ILB is a rare commodity.
My only concern is that we look like we’re turning into the Bears, circa last season (a better defense than offence). Lucky we got the offensive-minded coach!
"Remember, it's only a game."
by robswenson on Sep 2, 2009 11:01 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh, is that what we decided?
100-plus catches for 2 consecutive years makes you just ‘good’ Okay…
You catch a lot of balls and get thrown to a lot…probably because you are getting open all the time. Definitely not an elite receiver.
Fine, let’s just bring back Darius Watts and Marcus Nash…‘cause we’re so good at evaluating WR talent.
by xandervan on Sep 2, 2009 11:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
how many times was he thrown to while covered?
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
making him overrated helped by a QB who locked on to him
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
In your universe, you're right.
B-Marsh and Jay Cutler are overrated. Marshall is not an elite WR, because he’s not in Andre Johnson or Larry Fitzgerald. Cutler is not John Elway , so he is overrated. Trade them both!
Meanwhile…
Jack Williams is the second coming of Steve Atwater
Alphonso Smith was worth trading a 1st for 2nd
DJ Williams is 1 season away from finding his right position
Spencer Larsen is Knute Rockne
What was I thinking? We have a great team. Who needs Cutler and Marshall. Start sizing the rings.
by xandervan on Sep 3, 2009 2:05 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow...your sarcasm is showing a ::little bit::
I suppose it’s people like you that keep the Denver Post in circulation though.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 3, 2009 5:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've never felt Brandon was a Top-10 WR
Certainly not a Top-5. And the numbers back me up.
The idea of us paying him big money has bothered me for the last two years. After his first season with 100 catches I knew we were gonna be in a Catch-22. There are no circumstance under which I would pay him like aTop WR.
Thankfully Brandon was dumb enough to act out making the decision that much easier.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 10:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, he was 7th in yards
but tied for 22nd in touchdowns.
"Remember, it's only a game."
by robswenson on Sep 2, 2009 11:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
WR
He is regarded as one of the top ten best receivers in the league by many, and his past two seasons have been prolific.
by NJ Broncos on Sep 2, 2009 11:02 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Jamie Dukes is certaintly an authority on the matter
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just my opinion of course
Andre Johnson
Larry Fitzgerald
Steve Smith
Roddy White
Calvin Johnson
Wes Welker
Reggie Wayne
Terrell Owens
Santana Moss
Hines Ward
Anquan Boldin
Derrick Mason
Dwayne Bowe
Randy Moss
Steve Breaston
Eddie Royal
Muhsin Muhammad
T.J. Houshmandzadeh
Santonio Holmes
Anthony Gonzalez
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 11:03 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Seems pretty fair
overall but you wouldn’t at least put a healthy Marshall over at least a few of those guys? I thought Muhhamad wasn’t what he once was, Gonzalez will be good but hasn’t proven himself yet and is Mason still an elite WR? Just wondering but otherwise seems pretty accurate.
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Sep 2, 2009 11:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair questions
It’s all subjective of course.
But I guess my point is Marshall isn’t like a guaranteed Super Bowl win or something…
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 11:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anthony Gonzales?
really? I don’t think BMarsh is top 5, either, but he’s better than Anthony freaking Gonzales…
Horton is win.
by jack_ on Sep 2, 2009 11:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gonzales hasn't had much time yet
and is already tearing it up in Indy
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 11:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gozales
Is good. No need to knock him. Just wait until, well, this year. Now that he’s Peyton’s 2nd or 3rd (depending on Dallas Clark) target, he’ll probably post up gaudy numbers.
by RockyMountainHigh on Sep 3, 2009 1:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes he'll love the spotlight
but no I don’t think it’ll be good for him. If he didn’t get into trouble in NY within a year of being there I’d be stunned.
And keep that handgun out of your sweatpants, Brandon!
The commenter formerly known as "Dashiell".
by underdog on Sep 2, 2009 11:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
ha!
one WR with a hole in the leg is enough for one state
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
RE:Question for all
Harris will not make us an elite defense. Marshall can change how every defense plays us just by lining up on the offense.
by NJ Broncos on Sep 2, 2009 11:05 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
true
that was my fault. I didn’t specify what I meant. With Harris we have one more peace of the puzzle. Then we can address other needs through the draft and free agency
by milehighnation on Sep 2, 2009 11:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If...
Yes, Marshall can change how defenses play against us, IF he buys into the system, IF he is not injured (whether arm or leg) AND IF he is not suspended.
by Timimus on Sep 3, 2009 12:02 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
true true and double true.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 3, 2009 12:02 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trading BMarsh
Honestly… At this point I would agree to trade him for a 6pack of Coors and a couple of Sharpies. I was not a Shanny fan, but one of the things he did very well as the guy in charge of player/personell was cut his losses and move on when a player proved he wasnt going the same direction – and McD and Xanders are making a mistake with BMarsh by letting this drag on (and on and on and on). Cut the line already and move on.
by Toejam1 on Sep 2, 2009 11:07 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Jets Fans Worried
that they are going to give up Harris and 1st Round Pick. I doubt it, but that would make this story even better.
by SBBroncoFan on Sep 2, 2009 11:11 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
ur 20
I respect your opinion but I think only A.Johnson,L.Fitzgerald,C.Johnson, and R.Moss. are better. And out of these guys I think any one put up better stats. As for the rest of your list; They are all good players but they don’t have the stats to back up ur claim. I still think its a good list.
by NJ Broncos on Sep 2, 2009 11:14 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
That's fair
Honestly my main thing is, I really don’t believe BM will go another season without doing something really dumb. I just don’t think someone like him is going to change. I hope I’m wrong and he stays a Bronco and sets the NFL record for receptions and TDs and such, but I just don’t see it.
To me, it’s cutting our losses before he’s worth nothing on the market…
by ShawnDenver on Sep 2, 2009 11:16 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
and agreed. If we can get something of value (like this LB and a draft pick) I say we do it. The quicker we clean up our locker room the better off we’ll be. Plenty of good WR’s coming out these next few years. Stockpile picks and build through the draft. Every successful team in the NFL does it, why should we differ. He is a lost cause in Denver. He doesn’t want to be here and we aren’t going to improve any with him eating away at the morale of the team. Even though everyone SAYS he isn’t a distraction, you know he is, and I bet the team just wants to put an end to all the drama that has transpired this off season.
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
by grind_core on Sep 3, 2009 2:05 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
you can reply to individual posts, yadadamean
by lolcopter on Sep 2, 2009 11:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
In looking at some of the responses
why do I get the feeling that there is an underlying assumption that this is a bona fide trade offer?
From what I’ve read three facts are known:
1)McDaniels said the Broncos are not talking to anyone about a trade.
2)It was reported that the Jets were interested.
3)Someone in the FO made it clear what Denver would want for Marshall.
I have yet to hear anyone say that there have been phone calls going on between Denver and New York.
I fail to see how #2 & #3 invalidate #1 and make McDaniels a liar.
"The best defense is a good offense. Or is it the other way around." Wolverine
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and know you will come down somewhere between the two.
Livin' in La La Land and Lovin' It
by BShrout on Sep 2, 2009 11:30 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
no time like the present to assume something
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:32 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
the people have spoken
Mile High Report

Gang Green Nation

by lolcopter on Sep 2, 2009 11:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
New Beast...the LB Core!
Just something to think about. Imagine Doom, Harris, D.J. and Ayers as our LB’s of the future!!! That sounds nasty, and with Nolan heading the D, he will turn this unit into animals!!!
by themacmamba on Sep 2, 2009 11:35 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Love it
and think about this and i want your thoughts people, who has a better offense, Broncos or the Steelers? I think the Broncos do, and with some work, our D can put us up there. Thoughts?
"No matter how far a Jackass travels it will never come back a horse"
by SpaceCowboyInLG on Sep 2, 2009 11:36 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
On a side note;
Both Casey Hampton (NT) and Vince Wilfork (NT) are free agents at the end of the year, in addition, to NT prospects Terrance “Mt.” Cody and Ndamukong Suh.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 11:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could see McD plucking Wilfork away from NE (I think he's from NE)
but Chris Baker is something special, I fully expect him to be the starter by week 6.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 2, 2009 11:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baker did play DE in the 3-4 at Hampton at times
2010 D-line:
RDE – Fields
NT – Wilfork
LDE – Baker
Looks improved to me. And Wilfork is disgruntaled about the contract talks, but I have full faith the Pats will re-sign him. Just holding onto sliver’s of hope, but it’s something.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 2, 2009 11:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Wilfork resigning will be dependent on how Brace progresses this year. If he is ready to start for next year, I reckon the Patriots let Wilfork go, or maybe franchise tag and trade him.
by Timimus on Sep 3, 2009 12:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You could very well be right,
then again Vince Wilfork is the best NT in the game so it would be tough to let him go. Then we have the problem of being able to afford him.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 12:16 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Suh
Ndamukong Suh is listed by scout.com as 6’4" 300lbs that sounds more like a 3-4DE than a NT to me. I don’t remember seeing him listed as a NT prospect anywhere, do you have a source for that?
by Timimus on Sep 3, 2009 12:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Size is deceitful.
Look at Jay Ratliff, starting NT of the Dallas Cowboys; 6’4 304lbs. And that’s on one of the best 3-4 defenses in the league.
Suh has excellent technique and plays with great leverage. He is very strong and explosive, putting up good numbers last year despite constant double teams every game. It would be awesome to have him at DE (like a Richard Seymour) and a huge guy at NT, but Suh could handle the NT job.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 12:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
careful
you might give some of us wet dreams…
by RockyMountainHigh on Sep 3, 2009 1:52 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
BM should be begging McD to not trade him to NY
BM has shown some HUGE character issues….and many of those issues have begun at clubs….perhaps the worst of these being the altercation before DWill’s death. He has not shown that in his off time that he can stay away from trouble and going to NY would be give him a one-way ticket out of the league.
Marshall could not handle the night life and his own social scene in the relatively calm citites of Denver and Atlanta (where most of his past troubles with that one girl occured as well as the infamous McDonald’s wrapper).
Denver would get a nice package while giving a player his death sentence…..with that said I truly hope BM could fix his act especially if he is in NY.
On To Victory!!!
by alacumba!! on Sep 2, 2009 11:39 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
all the more reason to trade him.
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
by grind_core on Sep 3, 2009 2:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say make the trade.
At this years draft, I was hoping (hallucinating) the Aaron Curry would drop to us. If he wasn’t there, I would have taken Cushing. Either one of them – IMO – could have challenged Davis at ILB. That was – IMO – our greatest need. We had some other good personnel in place. I am not unhappy with the draft – it just took me some time to figure it out .
A 3rd round pick is right in the area of good talent. If we put the D in a good position to win games for us, it will help the O.
Good post, Guru. Thanks.
by Blackknigh on Sep 2, 2009 11:46 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Next years draft is loaded with talent too..
so the solid players with great value will be around in the late 2nd all the way through the 4th round I think.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 2, 2009 11:55 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Defense win's championships...
Old moniker but, true nonetheless.
I think the bigger question here is are we rebuilding or not? Can Coach McD afford to spend 3 years to get the team where he wants it or does he have to win now?
Is Bowlen willing to spend up the cap to win?
Broncos are gambling with BM either way. Don’t pay him this year, has a monster year, let him go for nothing.
Pay the guy, he gets hurt, or pulls another bonehead off the field move and the commish puts him out for the season and we’re back to square one and salary cap committed to him.
I still think it sets a terrible precedent to trade these players that are acting out and demanding things. If any of us were to display this behavior at work, what would happen to us?
by _Atwater27 on Sep 2, 2009 11:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, not specifically...and I agree that it does set a bad precedent...
but no one outside that locker room knows exactly how bad it is there. They’ve mentioned things here and there about him needing to earn trust back and all that, but I have a feeling the players don’t want him there—period. If it were a guy that had no off-field issues that was just unhappy about a contract, then I could see it being a bad message for your team. However, I think the locker room is just as much fed up with him as we are. At that point, it’s not about precedents anymore.
If it were about a precedent, I think it’s something along the lines of “You wanna screw around off the field and get in trouble, you won’t be in this locker room for long.”
And I don’t think the players would be looking to take advantage of that just to get out of town.
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 3, 2009 12:01 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its so tough to tell
I think you’re right in alot of ways. We’ll never really know what happens in the locker room. These players are coached by the PR (see : hey tell the media you’re not happy for BM) and their agents that you have no idea. Cutler the other night sounding like a scout was a prime example. What a poor job of acting. Also that flop when Dumerville hit him late.. Wait I’m getting off on a tangent.
If we get 110% value on him, trade him, otherwise, use him for the 2.2 mil we’re paying him this year.
I like the TEAM direction we’re going with McD though. I think Denver will be fine without paying this guy 7million a year. It would be nice to see a return though.
by _Atwater27 on Sep 3, 2009 12:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately, his injuries and character issues
have severly lowered his value. Realistically, getting an impact player (and Harris is that and more) and a pick is a coup.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 12:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Brandon Marshall is a stock
Agree randall.
I’m not buying anymore shares. I stick with him for a while and see if it rises.
I honestly don’t understand how any other GM in the league could be considering trading for this guy. Its a job losing/saving move. You’d have to be desperate to pull it off.
Denver wants more than his current value is worth and no team wants to pay. Marshall will stay put.
Randall, I too am a Randall from CO.
by _Atwater27 on Sep 3, 2009 12:20 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Thankfully the Jets really feel they're contenders.
But if they’re willin’, I’m sellin’. I’ll even through in Ocean Front Property in Arizona.
Two Randalls is better than one. :-)
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 12:28 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I say make the trade
Our defense would be much improved with this single player and we would allow our offense to finally begin establishing an identity. This distraction has been screwing with team chemistry through the entire offseason. It’s time to cut ties because it is painfully obvious that there is no love left here. We have to move on.
by tlrottman on Sep 3, 2009 12:29 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Its like that ex girlfriend..
That had so many negatives when you’re together but you always seem to remember things better than they were. Kind of my relationship with BM. I think of him just DOMINATING the Raiders week 1 and everything else is fuzzy (like coughing up the ball when he would try to get an extra yard and killing a drive). I think you’re right though, just tough to swallow.
Plus I hate listening to the media talk trash about how bad all these teambuilding moves are.
by _Atwater27 on Sep 3, 2009 12:34 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, memory is tricky.
For instance, Marshall wasn’t even on the field against the raiders week one. He was suspended. But you’re correct that one of the Broncos’ WRs really tore them up.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
by spock on Sep 3, 2009 7:36 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was that one rookie that burned Deangelo Hall on pretty much every play...
god what was his name? Something prestigious….Larry King? No….
OH! It was Eddie Royal!
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 3, 2009 12:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thinking about the Jets...
they have a young QB – whether it is Sanchez or Clemons or whomever – and they need more people to throw the ball to. One more experienced WR will help each of their QB’s move the chains.
They may want a LB in return if it is Harris that they give up – along with a draft pick. It may be Davis, WW or Larson that they ask for. That will be interesting. I would let Davis go in a heartbeat – even tho he does bring some skill and experience to the table.
I would make the trade for Harris and a 3rd. Possibly a 2nd if Davis is included.
Looking forward to a drama – less future.
by Blackknigh on Sep 3, 2009 12:35 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Davis doesn't get enough credit..
There’s nothing like watching your team just get dominated down the field, not being able to stop the run, like Frank Gore did to us in 2007. DJ is tight but isn’t the run stuffing ILB that Andra Davis is. He’s not fast in coverage but he will fill the hole and stop a RB in his tracks.
He was a good pickup for the money IMO.
by _Atwater27 on Sep 3, 2009 12:45 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes he was, but Harris has that same ability versus RBs
with the ability to play much better coverage than Davis. Either way Harris is still a run stuffer first. He just also has more skill in the other two LB areas; pass coverage and pass rush.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Sep 3, 2009 10:18 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted NO only for the fact
that as much as Harris would help our defense (and I am going on what you guys say because I don’t know anything about him) I would like a WR to help our offense this year.
On the other side I really don’t want anymore drama in Denver. I wasn’t pleased with how the Cutler situation went and after the way he was behaving I just wanted the whole thing to be OVER even if it meant trading him. Now for Marshall, I would like for this to end peacefully with him still on our team. However I go back to what I just said: NO DRAMA. As Guru stated and I also heard Woodson (think it was him or Eisen) say that he is one slip up from an 8-game suspension. If he is traded, his new team better realize they better give him a new contract in the process.
I want players who WANT to play for the Broncos and McDaniels so if Marshall doesn’t fit into that category then oh well……as much as that sucks. I honestly though BM would want to play and show everyone why he is deserving of a new contract, but I was wrong.
We are rebuilding so it will take awhile for things to begin to fall into place so we might as well have everyone on the same page now.
GO BRONCOS IN 2009 AND BEYOND!!
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Sep 3, 2009 1:04 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
McKinkley
I too would like to see Marshall play for us this season because he’s an awesome talent, but if he’s going to ruin the chemistry of the team I think that if we can get something of value for him then we should. However, if we do trade him it opens up a spot for McKinley to play with the first team offense. He really looks like a solid player.
by apecoraro on Sep 3, 2009 1:18 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am glad we have McKinley too.
He has shown a lot in preseason. I also like the pickup of Brandon Lloyd as well.
GO BRONCOS IN 2009 AND BEYOND!!
2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
by weazel on Sep 3, 2009 11:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't mean to demean Davis, Atwater.
You are right about his skills. I guess I got excited about the possibility of youth and speed.
by Blackknigh on Sep 3, 2009 1:06 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
DE is a bigger need
I think we need an impact DE. I can’t say that I know a lot about Harris, but I don’t think he would be a huge upgrade over Andra Davis, mainly because I think Andra is pretty solid. Harris is a little faster, but Davis has more experience.
Our biggest weakness on defense I think is at DE with McBean. I think if we could get Shaun Ellis that would be a huge upgrade over McBean. Not that I don’t like McBean, he seems like a nice player, but if we had Ellis it would give us impact players at every level of our defense with DJ and Doom at LB and Champ, Dawkins, and Goodman in the secondary.
by apecoraro on Sep 3, 2009 1:10 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Ellis would rule.
But he is another troublesome player, from what I recall. So we might be trading one headache for another in that scenario.
Take my advice, I'm not using it !!!
by grind_core on Sep 3, 2009 2:12 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I voted No
I would never trade Brandon Marshall until it was on the team’s terms, rather than letting the rest of the team see me let a 2nd young pro-bowler force his way out of town. I would rather bench him for the entire season than to send the message that the players are in charge and have the run of the roost.
I would trade Marshall only after he starts producing on the field with a good attitude, thereby increasing his value and allowing the team to dictate the when’s and the where’s. People often overlook the fact that Brandon is at least as likely as unlikely to be Broncos property for at least one additional season due to the CBA. No speedy decisions need made – he is no longer a distraction while sitting on his couch.
by elvisalex on Sep 3, 2009 3:49 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
David Harris is a lot more than solid...
He’s outstanding, and really underrated. I voted Yes, but it was with a good deal of reservations. I think if you trade Marshall for Harris, all of a sudden you’re a defensively focused team, and you have a pretty stellar Back 7. I think Marshall and Harris are comparable talents, and the 3rd rounder pushes it over the top for me, just slightly.
"I am not one of those who think that coming in second or third is winning." -- Robert F. Kennedy
by Ted Bartlett on Sep 3, 2009 5:18 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
It'd be nice to have our defense actually win us games again...
Not saying that I would prefer them be stronger than offense, but a nice goal line stand here and there would win us a few that our “2nd ranked offense” couldn’t win… copy?
"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu
by Joe Medina on Sep 3, 2009 5:35 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see the Jets making this trade. Harris is very very good and the Jets don’t have someone to fill his spot in the lineup. This trade would make their defense worse.
Love the Broncos, don't like their Coach.
by McGeorge on Sep 3, 2009 7:13 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think McD has a back-up plan for WR
Tony Scheffler…You want Beast…There you go…If we end up trading BM I think that Tony’s role will expand to include linning up at WR…He is big, fast, runs quick sharp routes, and has great hands…He will be a third down machine…Just my opinion
If we can dramatically improve the defense, make the trade!
by BroncoSense72 on Sep 3, 2009 5:53 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Change My Vote
If Lonbardi is right, then I may change my answer to no. http://cbs4denver.com/sports/nfl.denver.broncos.2.1160551.html
by phondonkey on Sep 3, 2009 6:48 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow....that's a tough one.
A couple of thoughts to consider:
McKinley has quietly been the 5th best receiver in preseason. He’s made a couple of mistakes, but when his prior coach calls him the best WR he has coached….that should say something.
Jets lost quite a bit of defensive talent in the offseason, so I’m not sure this offer would even be entertained.
I’m not familiar with Harris, but people I respect greatly here have spoken on how great he is/can be.
I am fed up with the MSM and their “analysis” of the Broncos. Unfortunately, we have to listen to those jackasses all season long….At least if we got comparable talent, we could move on and start building a team of players who WANT to be Broncos.
A proud prognostication of 10-6 in 2009!!!
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
John Adams
by Broncotodd on Sep 3, 2009 7:08 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I can't make up my mind
I’m glad I don’t have to make the decision. But, that said, if it were to happen, I’d be fine with it. After our incredibly good discussion yesterday on the 5-2, I’m convinced that this defense would be markedly improved if we could field two guys at LB that could run sideline to sideline and cover RBs and TEs. Andra Davis isn’t that guy, and I’m not convinced that Spencer Larsen is, either. I think Woodyard can cover and has speed, but his size will end up being a liability, sooner or later.
Plus, we get an extra draft pick in the deal. I think we can’t lose, unless Harris doesn’t come back well from his surgery. Anybody have any poop on how he looks this preseason? I’m assuming good, or this rumor wouldn’t have surfaced.
Man, looking at Harris’s stat line makes me happy. I know that’s not the whole story, but he seems legit to me.
by BroncosBassist on Sep 3, 2009 7:13 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Marshal is a physical freak; do not trade him
It is simply not possible to replace Marshall. He is a freak of nature. Even more so than Cutler, who combined good size, mobility and great arm strength. Marshal could be a bit faster, but he creates huge match-up problems. When healthy, he is a beast for DBs to bring down.
Bowlen should make an oral agreement, witnessed by his agent, promising they will make a legitimate, even generous offer to keep him a Denver Bronco after the season. Whatever it takes to get him back on the field and not fielding offers or possibilities elsewhere.
by Schwerepunkt on Sep 3, 2009 9:18 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Trade him
Im tired of the drama that comes with him.
live and die blue and orange
by jerry251 on Sep 3, 2009 9:33 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
If NY seriously offered that pacakage the Broncos would be stupid not to take it
Harris is a very good LB, BM will likely be out of the league in two years at this rate. But I seriously doubt NY would offer Harris, maybe a 3rd round pick and some scrub like Kellon Clemons, but I doubt they would offer a guy like Harris.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Sep 3, 2009 3:58 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
The Jets would never do this deal
Maybe a few years ago, but not now. Ryan is a defensive coach, hes said before hes fine with what he has on the offense end, so theres no reason to trade one of the centerpieces of his defense, and a pick, for a guy who touches the ball tops 10 times a game. Add in the pick, its no wonder why the Jets shoot this down as soon as it came out
Lower the price and NY will be calling, if all it took was a first rounder, then i’m sure the Jets would do it, even if they gave up a guy like Dwight Lowery, or a solid DT like Pouha, along with the pick, it may happen, but Harris is to much to ask for
"When we won the league championship, all the married guys on the club had to thank their wives for putting up with all the stress and strain all season. I had to thank all the single broads in New York"
Joe Namath
by Civardi on Sep 3, 2009 6:40 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
































