Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dog Football! Which Breeds Are Best Suited For The Gridiron?

Q & A With Silver and Black Pride:


Hey guys and gals, it's me, Saint, from Silver and Black Pride. Over the past 4 seasons we have had some good discussions involving the Raiders and Broncos and seeing that this week, albeit extremely early, we will be battling, in Oakland, for First Place, I want to open up some discussion.

I will use this Thread to answer any questions that you have about the Raiders and I'd appreciate it if you keep it civil, this is not meant to be a "Raiders Suck" or "JaMarcus is FAT Thread".

My early take is that both teams are greatly improved on defense this season and that the Raiders are in for their THIRD straight AFC West battle.

If you missed the first two games that the Raiders played, there were bodies left on the field everywhere, on both sides.
 So, ask away and I will return to answer these questions through-out the week.

Cheers,

Saint

P.S. Please rec this post so that it will stay up top for the week. Thanks!

This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

Comment 86 comments  |  35 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I thought the Raiders would be better this year than last...

But I would like to ask if you think Jamarcus can grasp the mental part of playing QB?

He (I can’t belive i am typing a compliment to a Raider) throws an awesome ball. Tight, deep, and pretty fast.

When I watch your favorite team play, it always seems that they go to the basics of football because of his development. Or lack thereof.

Granted, they win sometimes with this formula, but he is going to have to get better with the mental aspect of his game to take them to the next level.

by precisiontint on Sep 22, 2009 10:12 AM MDT reply actions  

JaMarcus's Mental Approach:

In all honesty, he has NEVER come off as someone I’d sit around discussing Plato’s Academy with, but his footb all acumen iis definitely there.

His reads have been great this season, it is just that his accuracy hasn’t been there.

His favorite targets, Johnnie Lee Higgins and Chaz Schilens, weren’t available last week and he has been trying to get on the same page with a couple of rookies. That would be tough for anyone!

I have noticed that the offense has been VERY simple, especially when you compare it to the Colts or Saints with all of the confusion created by multiple looks and checks on the line. Some will say that it is dummied up, and I can’t argue with that, especially after the terrible play calling last week.

But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."

by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Sep 22, 2009 10:43 AM MDT up reply actions  

I guess it depends on which part of the mental game you mean

If it’s mental as in “Read the defense and go through progressions” then he is definitely coming along. way ahead of where he was last year.

If it’s mental as in “I’ve got to get my mind right and be a leader” then again, he’s way ahead of where he was last year.

Obviously there’s room for continued improvement in both cases, but there has been improvement.

But if you mean mental as in “Calm down, cowboy and do things right” then I haven’t seen as much improvement as I’d like. His footwork is still off. He still doesn’t look off the safety.

Mainly, I think his problem is that he throws EVERY SINGLE BALL like a laser. He needs to learn touch. He needs to learn to take a deep breath, control the adrenaline and just play.

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 11:22 AM MDT up reply actions  

Let's talk about offense?

You’ve lost 2 key OL in the past 2 weeks. J Russell’s accuracy and effectiveness seem to be the talk on MSM this week. You guys amassed 170 yds total offense. There was some chatter about McFadden going down to easily (never saw it at Arkansas). How do you think the Raiders will attack Denver this week?

Thanks…..

"Attitude reflects Leadership" Hogblog...aka KSM

by Hogblog on Sep 22, 2009 10:14 AM MDT reply actions  

We only lost one OL: Robert Gallery: And he is our best

McFadden does seem to go down on his own a lot! It is as if he his feet are moving faster than his body. He is best used in space, with Michael Bush being the man up the middle, but for some reason, Tom Cable sent McFadden up tyhe middle about 10 times last week before he finally sent him off left tackle for a TD.

I would use a bunch of screens and challenge the safeties deep.

I’d also go right at the Nose Tackle to start the game then move the rushing game outside. I would also have a few QB scrambles and RB draws to keep the linebackers honest.

But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."

by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Sep 22, 2009 10:46 AM MDT up reply actions  

Gallery going down sucks for us

He’s the single most underrated offensive lineman in the AFC, if not all of football.

I was worried because Chris Morris actually beat out Samson Satele for the starting center position even though Satele was specifically traded for to be the starter. But, when Gallery has gone out twice now (once briefly with back spasms in Week 1 and then after breaking his leg on Sunday) Satele has come in, Morris has shifted to guard and things kept going pretty well. Fortunately, Satele’s problem was not physical talent, but difficulty in learning to become a ZBS center, which as you probably know is the QB of the offensive line.

McFadden doesn’t fight nearly as much as I’d like to see, although if you listen to some people you’d think he goes down the first time a defensive player gets within 10 feet of him. He’s all about explosiveness. Running him up the gut drives me batty because he doesn’t have room to work. Get him in space and watch him make defenses look silly. We have Bush for the tough running. Why Cable can’t grasp that, I have no idea. He’s a good coach, but he seems to have a tendency to try to fit square pegs into round holes.

Denver is the third 3-4 defense in a row we’ve faced, so I anticipate a style similar to what we saw against SD and KC. I’d hope we see more commitment to the run like we did against San Diego. It seemed to me like Cable was so desperate to get a lead and take advantage of KC’s mistakes that he tried to force the passing game when it clearly wasn’t there.

I’d look for a lot of running behind our left tackle and guard. Even with Gallery out, the left side of our O-line is the best and I think Mario Henderson will be able to handle Kenny Peterson without much trouble and Elvis Dumervil is much more suited to rushing the passer than stopping the run.

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 11:31 AM MDT up reply actions  

Gallery sucks, that's why he didn't make it at LT and was moved to guard.

If he’s your best lineman, then your O-line is worse than I thought. Your defense looks top-notch though. But you guys will drop this one by at least 2 TD’s.

Plain and simple.

Average Raider Fan's IQ = 89
Bill Williamson's IQ = 75
Find yours by clicking here.

by kwool79 on Sep 22, 2009 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

To make that statement you obviously don't know much about our o-line.

He has flamed out at LT but has been strong at the guard position. Per Rotoworld:

Gallery is regarded by less knowledgeable observers as a bust because he didn’t pan out at left tackle, but he’s developed into one of the league’s top guards. It’s worth noting that the Oakland line struggled when he wasn’t in the game Sunday.

Gallery is one of our better O-linemen along with Mario Henderson.

by Raider76 on Sep 22, 2009 4:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

walked into that one.

Average Raider Fan's IQ = 89
Bill Williamson's IQ = 75
Find yours by clicking here.

by kwool79 on Sep 22, 2009 5:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

LT is a much more demanding position...a slower guy getting beat at LT could become a solid G because of the space he's working in...

of course, I haven’t watched him so I couldn’t tell you if he pulls well and helps open any lanes. I think Doom will embarrass whoever they got. :P

Oh and you are dreaming if you think this will be anything but a close game…Divisional rivalries are a different beast…

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

by Tim Lynch on Sep 22, 2009 5:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

I hope I'm awake.

What about the away game at Oakland last year? 41-13 or something like that? Then they killed us at the end of the year. Neither game was close.

Average Raider Fan's IQ = 89
Bill Williamson's IQ = 75
Find yours by clicking here.

by kwool79 on Sep 22, 2009 5:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

I underrated Dumervil bigtime

But I’m not worried. Mario Henderson is a beast.

In his last 5 games, he’s taken on Richard Seymour, Mario Williams, Gaines Adams, Shawne Merriman, Luis Castillo and Tamba Hail and shut. them. down. Grand total for them: 0 sacks.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 7:19 AM MDT up reply actions  

Expect to see DOOM going against your RT on Sunday

They like to move him around to get the best matchups possible.

People can use statistics to prove anything, 87% of all people know that.

by c_style on Sep 24, 2009 4:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

Seymour for a first?

Are you guys good with the Seymour trade? It seems, IMO, like a win now move for a team that isn’t there yet.

by madtown on Sep 22, 2009 10:14 AM MDT reply actions  

I am extremely happy with the trade:
  1. It should be a mid to late first rounder because the Raiders should be at least in contention by 2010.
  1. How many first rounders are going to be as good as Seymour?
  1. I believe that he will sign here long term in order to avoid being franchised.
  1. His 3.8 million dollar salary is peanuts compared to his impact on the field.

But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."

by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Sep 22, 2009 10:48 AM MDT up reply actions  

All good points

I don’t know if he’ll sign a long term contract or not – I suspect that you’re right regarding the franchise tag, but part of this may depend on the experience he has this year. Either way – he improved the Raiders defense by a power of two just by being on the field, and you’re going to love having this guy.

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Doc Bear on Sep 22, 2009 2:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good Point!

That is why JaMarcus’ play is soo important to this team! If he can be more consistent we can expect some good things from this club this year.

by Raider76 on Sep 22, 2009 4:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

I was ambivelant at first, but now I love it

I would’ve been less thrilled if it had been a 2010 first round, since it’s still likely to be top 15, but in 2011 there’s a good chance that our team will start to seriously gel. Especially with San Diego on its way down and KC showing no marked signs of improvement yet, we’re likely to be slugging it out for the division title in December 2011.

Anyway, a player like Seymour doesn’t come along every day for whatever price. A 29 year old Richard Seymour is a sure thing. A D-Lineman fresh out of school is not. I think a lot of people criticizing the Seymour trade just didn’t realize what dire straits our run defense was in. Awful doesn’t even come close. Then too, Seymour brings veteran leadership and, most importantly, a winning attitude. Most players on this team literally do not know what it’s like to win. Importing Seymour and a guy like Greg Ellis brings successful veterans from winning cultures for the young, raw talent (and we’ve got that in spades) to look up to.

Now, if Seymour walks after this season, I’ll come back here and say the trade was bad. But Al will open up the checkbook, I have no doubt.

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 11:44 AM MDT up reply actions  

Al Davis - do you and your fellow fans have any faith that he knows what he is doing anymore?

First of all thank you for coming on this site. My question is not supposed to be rude or disrepectful. Al Davis certainly knew how to build great teams in the past. But something appears to have gone wrong recently.

I would genuinly like to know if Raider fans see what the rest of us see (or at least appear to at any rate).

by British Bronco on Sep 22, 2009 10:28 AM MDT reply actions  

Al Davis is a true Maverick:

He is measured only against himself in this League, truly.

He turned a 400k loan into a 300 million dollar franchise.

As to your question, he does know how to build a team and he is never shy to re-load while rebuilding.

Adding Ellis and Seymour in the off-season has really answered the paryers of all Raider fans. He also found Chris Johnson when he was nearly “washed up”.

He does know how to build a team, the last 6 seasons have just been awful and many in the MSM have been taking shots at him, now that the losing has allowed them too.

I believe that the Raiders will be a winning team again, under Davis.

But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."

by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Sep 22, 2009 10:52 AM MDT up reply actions  

Hmm...

I guess I see Al Davis as a bit washed up. He’s been great in the past, but I am having trouble seeing him letting go of that, and allowing things to change, giving up a little control to allow it to happen.

Ultimately, that’s the bottom line, he seems too controlling to me. If he thinks he knows it all right now, he won’t see the truth later.

Maybe he will surprise me, but as a Bronco fan, him staying alive and active in that organization is a good thing for the Broncos…

by Mhantra on Sep 22, 2009 1:44 PM MDT up reply actions  

Saint you're certainly right about Davis being a Maverick:

Without him or Lamar Hunt we don’t have the AFL or the AFC. I think he has always been unique in the players he selects. But, he has really missed in recent years, at least since Chucky left, in putting a good HC in place. Cable seems capable that is for sure, but do you think he is the long term HC?

by bchiper on Sep 22, 2009 1:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

I Like Cable as a Head Coach:

I just wish that we had a Norv Turner-like Play Caller on Offense. Cable is a terrible play caller.

But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."

by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Sep 22, 2009 3:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think alot of us are split in regards to Al Davis!

I love everything that Al has done for the City of Oakland, the Raiders and the fans but I feel that he needs to step aside and let coaches coach and just enjoy being an owner. The Kiffin fiasco last year tested alot of Raider fans faith in him. I love him but just wish he would bring people people in to help him run it.

by Raider76 on Sep 22, 2009 4:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not meant as an insult, a genuine question

Is Russell really that inaccurate?

That game against KC was one of the worst I’ve seen a QB play. He missed very easy short passes – not barely, but not even close.

It seemed against KC that Cable was trying to keep the offense simple to allow Russell to get into a rythem, but really up to the last drive he really didn’t do anything the entire game.

2nd, how do you feel Oakland’s Dline compares to Denver’s Oline? I really think that will be the critical matchup. We know your punter will boom the ball, so Denver will need to effectively move the ball to maintain the field position battle, and I think it really comes down the the two lines.

3rd, do you have any confidence in Oaklands ability to sustain drives against Denver?

Thanks!

by powderaddict on Sep 22, 2009 10:30 AM MDT reply actions  

Right now, yes he is

But he’ll learn. (For the record, I actually thought Steve Young’s comment about “You can’t teach accuracy” was asinine. Raiders beat reporter Jerry McDonald said that Young has personally told him that when he was new in the league, he wasn’t accurate at all. He had to learn from coaching and watching Joe Montana play. Ah, concussions.)

Your O-line is really really good. So is our defenisve line. It should be an interesting matchup. One key will be if Ryan Clady can handle Richard Seymour one-on-one. Gerard Warren and Greg Ellis had great games on Sunday because KC was devoting their left tackle, left guard and center to stopping Seymour and Tommy Kelly, which left them one-on-one with KC’s right guard and tackle . The difference with you guys is that your O-line is considerably more talented than KC’s. They HAD to double Seymour and Kelly or face utter destruction.

Yes I do have confidence that we can sustain drives if JaMarcus plays well. If not, then we’re in trouble. This whole team is on his shoulders.

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 11:48 AM MDT up reply actions  

saint

Let me know if it’s cool if I answer some questions too….don’t want to be treading on your territory!

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 10:36 AM MDT reply actions  

Of course! Answer away! be respectful, of course:

But when they start scheming us the way these guys did, and we weren't particularly ready for it, anything can happen."

by Raymond St. Martin (Saint) on Sep 22, 2009 10:53 AM MDT up reply actions  

Throwback

The Raider’s throwback uniforms looked good. I liked them better than their newer ones. Although they haven’t changed much, do you think it’s time to make a bigger change? Like maybe Yellow and Brown :)

Ok, that was meant to be disrespectful to the Broncos Throwback unis….

Not all change is good, just as not all movement is forward.

by Trogdoor on Sep 22, 2009 11:05 AM MDT reply actions  

Oh comon man.. we have stripy socks ffs!

Not sure who we paly that day but we will win puerly on the strength of those socks.. lol

by HorseStance on Sep 22, 2009 11:13 AM MDT up reply actions  

How do you think JR and your rookie receivers will do..

.. against our ‘aging’ secondary which incidentally has allowed no passing touchdows in 2 games..

Or do you think you will be focusing more on the running game because that seems to be more your strength right now?

Also what did you think of the DHB draft choice? and how has he done so far.. in camp/first two games..

by HorseStance on Sep 22, 2009 11:11 AM MDT reply actions  

Robert Gallery

He has been in the league a few years now, and he never really developed into the dominant tackle that he was heralded coming out of college which I thought was a little disappointing because I thought the kid would be a real stud in the NFL.

How do you feel about his development into a guard, who will be his replacement now that he is hurt, and do you think there will be much of a drop off in terms of production? Thanks for answering!

On To Victory!!!

by alacumba!! on Sep 22, 2009 11:13 AM MDT reply actions  

I couldn't tell you why Gallery never became the franchise tackle

But I can tell you the guy is an AWESOME guard. A straight up mauler in run blocking and very very very solid in pass protection.

His replacement will likely be Chris Morris, who will slide over from center and be replaced at center by Samson Satele. That being said, we do have this report from Jerry McDonald:

With Gallery out, Cable wouldn’t commit to making the same Morris/Satele move made in Weeks 1 and 2

"I want to sit down and really think that through this evening and tomorrow and make a good call," Cable said. "We’ve got to look at it like the plan to fix the next month where we can be productive that way. That may be the right way to do it. I just want to make sure as I look at the big picture."

Cable said other options include Erik Pears, Khalif Barnes or Paul McQuistan at left guard, with Morris remaining at center.

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 12:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

Gallery's footwork was terrible!

Speed rushers would blow by him constantly. He works great in little space.

by Raider76 on Sep 22, 2009 4:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ok, it looks like we both agree on JaMarcus' weight issue(FAT!). lol just playing with you, here is my real question/comment... :)

I see the Raiders as a competitive football team(finally!), but the culture of losing is a hard thing to break. Especially when it spans 5+ seasons. Their defense looks stout and will pose problems for our apparent enemic offense, but can JaMarcus Russell really lead a team down the field on a consistent basis? 36% completion rate…I could do better…really, just throwing blindly in the direction of the WR’s. Really man, that has to be a cause for concern, especially going up against Champ and BDawk.

I am predicting the Raiders finish with their first 7 win season in a long time and the rivalry is obviously back between our two teams. The battle this weekend will be between the Raiders O and the Broncos D and so far the Broncos D has looked impressive. JaMarcus will cost you big time if he continues to be totally inept passing the ball.

How do you see this struggle shaking loose? Do you sense anything about this game that we might be missing?

I predict the Broncos win a close one, 16-9.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

by Tim Lynch on Sep 22, 2009 11:32 AM MDT reply actions  

It'll be a hard fought contest, that's for sure

The “X” factors are going to be Russell and Orton. Both can be wildly inconsistent in their play, not only from game to game, but from series to series within the same game. How will they match up against two very, very good secondaries. (Asomugha and Bailey are two of the 5 best corners in the league).

We know the line vs. line/running game vs. running game will be the story line. I think whichever team has the best QB play will win.

Remember Russell’s two games against you last season, though:

17 for 26, 180 yards, 2 TDs, 111.1 rating

10 for 11, 152 yards, 1 TD, 149.1 rating

Given his struggles last week, I’d look for a gameplan similar to Week 12 of last year. I do have to believe he’ll pass more like 18-20 times, though.

If he plays well, I think the Raiders can win something like 23-16. If he plays like he did against KC, then I can see the Broncos pulling out a 24-13 win because the defense will just wear out.

Right now I’m being optimistic for our side, so I’m going with the Raider victory.

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 12:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hi Raybin, thanks to you and Saint being here...

2 points:
1/ What JR did last year has NO bearing on this year. Completely different defense/
2/ I would not say Orton is inconsistent. He throws a lot away so as tp not be intercepted.

Should be a fun game!

Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.

by boydy2669 on Sep 22, 2009 12:15 PM MDT up reply actions   2 recs

Good point about the different defense...

…but I mostly wanted to point out and say that you shouldn’t automatically dismiss Russell out of hand. He can have, has had and will have very effective games.

Maybe he’s gotten better with you guys under McDaniels coaching, but from what I saw of Orton in Chicago, I wouldn’t label him as terribly consistent.

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 12:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

difficult to be consistant when you have a bad o-line..

I hope Russel has a good game… and you play well.. and we beat you anyway.. lol

But i guess that goes without saying ;-)

If record on McD’s coaching ability is based on last year alone.. he has shown he can make something out of nothing at the QB position..

BTW we all know how good Asomouga (SP?) is, how would you rate the rest of your secondary?

by HorseStance on Sep 22, 2009 1:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

The 2008 Broncos D was the worst in Bronco history...the 2009 D is a whole different beast.

just a fair warning to JaMarcus…. ;-)

DOOM!

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

by Tim Lynch on Sep 22, 2009 3:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

No.

Don’t do that. Dr. Doom is a little bitch, like most of the Fantastic Four universe. He spends most of his time baaaaawwwwwwwing about Reed Richards and their schoolboy differences.

I have to admit, his obsession with raising zombie armies is really amusing.

I thought you knew that algebra was all razzamatazz. A Globetrotter always saves the good algebra for the final minutes.

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 23, 2009 4:33 AM MDT up reply actions  

The Raider's Draft of 2009 was derided by pundits all around

What is your take now that you have seen these guys in camp in through 2 games. In particular, Heyward Bey and Mike Mitchell?

Thanks.

Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.

by TJ Johnson on Sep 22, 2009 11:52 AM MDT reply actions  

Our 2009 draft & my thoughts

Round 1 – Darrius Heyward-Bey, WR, Maryland:

The ultimate definition of “ask me in a couple years.” Certainly there were more NFL ready players. Only 1 catch in 2 games is discouraging, but given the way JaMarcus has been throwing the ball to his receivers, I’m not gonna hit the panic button yet (at least with regard to Heyward-Bey himself!). He and J-Russ have got to develop a serious rapport and do it SOON. Like, before mid-season. He’s too good a potential weapon to let languish. And right now, all we can talk about is potential. I will say he is as fast as advertised and blocks extremely well.

Round 2 – Mike Mitchell, S, Ohio

He was having a great camp until he tweaked his hamstring and missed every pre-season game. He was ready to go on opening night, but has only been used in special teams since he missed pre-season. He made a sweet solo tackle on Sproles during kick coverage. Looking at his highlights, everyone got all hot and bothered over the brutal hits he can deliver, but what I was most impressed by was his football sense. He can diagnose a play and close on the ballcarrier in a flash. I hope that translates to the NFL. We probably won’t see him at safety a whole lot until the 2nd half of the year, though.

Round 3 – Matt Shaughnessy, DE, Wisconsin

This was a reach for sure. I was very unimpresed with him during camp, but he did come on in the last two pre-season games. I thought maybe he should be cut and signed to the practice squad, but he made the team straight out of camp. He’s proven me wrong to a degree by proving in the pre-season and spot duty while spelling Ellis the past two weeks in having a very high motor and disrupting some plays in the backfield and harrassing the QB. He can only get better.

Round 4 – Louis Murphy, WR, Florida

Great pick, especially value wise. Murphy has already shown he’ll be good as soon as he polishes his game. Look for a breakout year in 2010.

Round 4 – Slade Norris, DE/OLB, Oregon State

I liked what I saw from Norris in camp & pre-season so I was surprised when he was cut. But, fortunately, he was signed to the practice squad. I think he has big potential. Apparently the Raiders like what they see in him too, they just felt he hadn’t fully transitioned from playing DE most of the time to playing full time OLB.

Round 6 – Stryker Sulak, DE/LB, Missouri

Epic fail here. He was cut by the Raiders before camp even started. He was signed by Green Bay and was part of their first batch of roster cuts in the trim to 75. As far as I know he hasn’t signed with anyone else.

Round 6 – Brandon Myers, TE, Iowa

One of the pleasant camp surprises, Myers was drafted as a blocking TE, but suddenly started catching everything thrown his way. He’s the 3rd TE right now on the roster behind Zach Miller and Tony Stewart, but I look for him to move up to #2 next season.

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 12:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

I've wondered if Al didn't like Stryker and Sald for their incredibly cool names ;-)

Just kidding. I never understood the Norris pick, but I was envious of the Louis Murphy pick – you’ve got a really fine prospect in him. My only knock on O’Shaughnessy is that he’s got a long history of injury. If he can stay healthy and make the transition (tough, right out of college) he’ll be a good player. With Myers coming on and your starting TE, you guys will be able to max protect when Russell needs it – do you see the Raiders playing more 2 TE sets?

Hillis/Moreno in '09

by Doc Bear on Sep 22, 2009 2:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

Frankly, i don't know why they haven't done more 2 TE sets

Here’s hoping they start to. Could be real effective for our run game and to help out JaMarcus.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 7:09 AM MDT up reply actions  

Played HS basketball against Myers

Good to see he’s succeeding, even if for Oakland. It’s crazy to think he was only the 2nd or 3rd best TE on Iowa last year, and he made an NFL team.

by studbucket on Sep 22, 2009 2:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Raybin

Thanks for those answers.

Even though Mel Kiper Jr. questioned the Mitchell pick, I think he could have the greatest impact. And WRs in the 1st round. Who knows with them. They are almost like QBs. Half are great, half bomb. Good summaries. Again, thanks!

Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.

by TJ Johnson on Sep 22, 2009 4:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

Whats Seymour playing?

Is he a DE or a DT? does he rotate between the two?

by DBroncs1414 on Sep 22, 2009 12:27 PM MDT reply actions  

He starts at DE

He moves inside to DT on passing downs to allow Trevor Scott to come in as pass rush specialist.

One of the things I liked that they did against SD that they seemed to get away from against KC was moving Seymour around constantly. He played all 4 positions by the end of the night and it seemed to confuse the Charger offensive line.

by Raybin on Sep 22, 2009 12:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

that will be key

The Broncos OL is more than capable of handling ur DL, but Seymour might make a play or 2

by DBroncs1414 on Sep 22, 2009 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

O and hows the OL doin?

it was a huge weakness last year, has it improved? and how will the loss of Gallery affect u guys?

by DBroncs1414 on Sep 22, 2009 12:30 PM MDT reply actions  

Left tackle, left guard and center are solid

Right guard and right tackle……well, not so much.

Gallery’s loss will hurt the running game, but Chris Morris has been a real pleasant surprise at center and should be able to play guard effectively too.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 7:08 AM MDT up reply actions  

Cable

How did you and the majority of Raider nation feel about retaining Cable? Would you have preffered they go after a higher profile guy or did you think he would just be a puppet of Davis (I say that without any knowledge, so please tell me if thats an incorrect statement).

Also how did you feel about all of the Lane Kiffen drama this time last year?

On To Victory!!!

by alacumba!! on Sep 22, 2009 12:52 PM MDT reply actions  

The last 4 games of the season...

….he finally figured out how to be an NFL coach. So we were mostly for retaining him, especially since the team showed pretty good. He appears to be trying to bring the swagger back to the team, which is something that we’ve all missed.

A lot of people think Cable is a puppet of Davis, but that’s not fair. ANY coach is going to have to defer to Davis to a certain degree. For a lot of coaches who are extremely Type A personalities and control freaks, it explains why they don’t want to come to Oakland.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 7:08 AM MDT up reply actions  

As for the Kiffin drama...

….I was mostly on his side last year, until I realized—not to put too fine a point on it—what an insufferably arrogant prick the man was.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 7:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

Hey there Saint

Hope you and the little one are doing well!

1) What are the strengths and weaknesses of this year’s offense for the Raiders so far?

2) Same question for the defense?

3) What’s the attitude of the fans about the HC punching out one of the assistants? Are folks annoyed, or is it part of the culture, or is there more to the story (I haven’t followed it at all)?

4) What is the attitude of most fans towards Al Davis right now? Is the support strong, or wavering?

Thanks for your time!

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Sep 22, 2009 1:19 PM MDT reply actions  

You guys should have beat the degans week one.

If you have watched our games with Cincy and Cleveland and witnessed how our defense seemed to cover there attack pretty well, how do you see this game going for the raiders on offense? We get no respect from anybody which is good for me but Cincy did pretty darn good agains the Packers Sunday and couldn’t score a point untill :59 seconds left in the game. I rate Carson Palmer as a topnotch quarterback who struggled all day as well as Cedric Benson who is tauted as a pretty good RB. Will mistakes rule this game? And who do you think will win this contest? Thanks.

by bfree2bronc on Sep 22, 2009 1:36 PM MDT reply actions  

Well of course I think the Raiders will win!

Anything else would be treason. :-)

Seriously, though, I do think mistakes and field position will rule this game.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 7:06 AM MDT up reply actions  

We all realize that you have Nhamdi playing corner and most see Huff as a big threat on the other side.

However, how do you think your nickel and dime matches up with our 3 or 4 …….. or 5 WR sets? Do you have DB depth

Also, how do you expect your defense to slow down Hillis and Moreno out of the backfield in the passing game??

Bringing Bronco love from 1,112 miles away

by Troy Hufford on Sep 22, 2009 1:44 PM MDT reply actions  

Our nickel and dime packages...

….scare the crap out of me. Stanford Routt is a dime corner masquerading as a nickel DB. John Bowie probably couldn’t find a roster spot on any other team.

Our starting corners are one of the best starting tandems in the league. The depth after them is appallingly bad. Wouldn’t mind seeing the Raiders take a shot in the draft in the second or third round to try and secure a true nickel DB.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 7:05 AM MDT up reply actions  

QUESTION:

Did anyone in Raider Nation expect Michael Huff to be as explosive and effective as he has been? Although I’m a Bronco fan, I give credit where credit is due. Do you think Huff’s success in the secondary has been a byproduct of Nnamdi on the other side, is it him just being in the right place at the right time?

"FLAG! Fail on the field. Re-do." -Disco_Stu

by Joe Medina on Sep 22, 2009 1:45 PM MDT reply actions  

We expected him to be explosive and effective...

….three years ago. Nice to see him finally coming around. He seems like a good kid who just could never put it together. This season was known to be his last chance…either perform or hit the waiver wire. As for why he suddenly came on this season? I have no idea. Sometimes with players, the light bulb just finally clicks on, you know? We’re hoping it happens with JaMarcus next.

He’s also finally playing deep free safety, which is his natural position. This is another way of saying “Rob Ryan is a moron and I’m glad he’s gone.”

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 7:04 AM MDT up reply actions  

Another question...

Do you think that if your team were to be made one-dimensional (running game shut down), that Russell could shoulder the load in the passing game? From what I’ve seen so far, it doesn’t look like it.

I thought your running game looked scary good against the Chargers, and you probably would have won if you hadn’t put the ball in Russell’s hands. It looked like the Raiders were going to drive at will if you mainly ran and did play action, and then inexplicably switched to passing deep with Russell. I’m not a football genius, but if I were the D coordinator I’d work to shut down the run and make Russell beat us with his arm. I don’t think he can do it.

by NDbronco on Sep 22, 2009 3:04 PM MDT reply actions  

Right now, the answer is no

Russell has got to have a run game behind him. But with him being so ineffective, teams just stack the box. Which leads to a bad run game, which then spirals into a vicious cycle that feeds on itself.

He needs to improve. He doesn’t have to be Tom Brady or Drew Brees or Peyton Manning—anyone who expects him to be is a moron—but he does need to be a Matt Hasselbeck or Kerry Collins. that is, an efficient game manager who limits mistakes but can also get the job done with his arm if it comes to it. Of course, I’d like for him to be a touch above either of those two, given his physical pedigree and huge contract!

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 7:01 AM MDT up reply actions  

If there was a draft tomorrow?

If there was a draft tomorrow and Oakland could upgrade any position with a draft pick. What position do you think they would address and why. Excluding players that are injuryed like Gallery.

by maritimebronco on Sep 22, 2009 4:28 PM MDT reply actions  

We're set at left tackle right now

But Cornell Green at right tackle is a serious hindrance. If we draft OT, would like to see Ciron Black out of LSU. He’s a big, mean mauler and has the versatility the Raiders like in their O-Lineman, since he can also play guard. Adam Ulatoski out of Texas is similar.

Mike Johnson, a right guard at Alabama is also an intriguing prospect. He can play right tackle too and we’re in need of upgrades at both positions.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 6:58 AM MDT up reply actions  

Linebacker

Brandon Spikes out of Florida or Rolando McClain out of Alabama could be plugged into the middle, with Morrison sliding to SLB, where he’s also very effective.

Sean Weatherspoon out of Missouri would be a great pick to replace Ricky Brown on the outside.

Of course if we have a shot at drafting any of those, we’ll be drafting in the top 15, so i’m kinda hoping we don’t. :-) But that’s who I’d take if I could.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 6:54 AM MDT up reply actions  

true or false?

Al Davis has called down overriding playcalls to the coaches on the field.

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

by Jeremy Bolander on Sep 22, 2009 4:58 PM MDT reply actions  

Ha! Styg

This is an Urban Legend, isn’t it?

Smokey, my friend, you are entering a world of pain.

by TJ Johnson on Sep 22, 2009 5:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

As far as I know, the only source for that story...

…is Warren Sapp. Which is another way of saying it’s not true.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 6:50 AM MDT up reply actions  

Saint! A fellow ANer who has different roots for pigskin...

It’s me, princemilo. You may remember a few years back I posted on Athletics Nation about my experience at the coliseum at Raiders/Broncos game (Nov. 13, 2005 – DENVER 31, OAKLAND 17). I tried to find the link to the post, but it is gone — something like “An Enemy in My Home Coliseum”. It was a surreal experience because I’d only been to the Coliseum for A’s games (and I am a passionate A’s fan since the Billy (Martin) Ball days. I am (as you may remember or now more clearly than ever see by my happy home here, an even “die-harder” Bronco fan (infected as a seven year old in ’77 at a Bronco house party where I got “drunk” on Orange Crush and Cheetos).

As I remember you took me to task on several things about my posting. Anyway, it was a lively and fun thread.

To the current day — I’m wondering about the current state of affairs in the Coliseum with the Raiders and their fans. Is there great hope, cautious optimism or drunken “so what, we’re Silver & Black no matter what” going on up there.

I miss the Bay (living in Vegas these days) and wish you and the Coliseum well every time it concerns an A’s game.

by princemilo on Sep 22, 2009 5:07 PM MDT reply actions  

I have a friend who is a Charger fan and went to their game at Oakland a couple weeks ago;

They stole his hat uponarrival and threw it in the trash and dumped nachos all over his back. His new nickname is “Nacho” now.

Average Raider Fan's IQ = 89
Bill Williamson's IQ = 75
Find yours by clicking here.

by kwool79 on Sep 22, 2009 5:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

Don't condone what happened to your friend
His new nickname is "Nacho" now.

Thats soo wrong! LOL

by Raider76 on Sep 22, 2009 9:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

You talked a bit about the quality of the D-Line and the Secondary....

but not much about the linebackers. Have you seen opposing offenses exploiting the part of the field behind the line but in front of the secondary a lot? Has there been a particular play that seems to get through the D a lot. In pre-season the Broncos had issues within really active TEs, haven’t seen a team really go for it in regular season though so it’s hard to tell if that is a weakness or not.

by gOOn on Sep 22, 2009 5:37 PM MDT reply actions  

Our linebacking corps

Thomas Howard has been everywhere these past two games playing with fire an intensity. He’s one of the best pass-defending linebackers in the league. In fact, I’ll go farther and say he may be the most underrated weak side linebackers in the league as well. Kirk Morrison in the middle had a bad game against SD, but had 13 solo tackles in Kansas City. The weak spot right now is Ricky Brown on the strong side.

Problems tend to arise when they have Morrison drop back too far, which leads a huge hole in the middle. Our linebackers also aren’t great at blitzing, which may explain why we don’t do it a whole lot.

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 6:49 AM MDT up reply actions  

my 2 cents

this should be close a 17-14 type of game ob- den has the adv rb push wr-te den o-line oak they are very good run blockers while we have been called for holding a lot d-line oak lb den cb-s push st oak we are even but i think jamarcus will make one misatake a pick-6 i like den -17-14

okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule

by j-man on Sep 22, 2009 6:02 PM MDT reply actions  

I hate these Q&A thread during raiders week because of its tendency to humanize fans of the silver and black. It’s almost like they’re real life semi-normal people. Don’t make me like you!!! ;-)

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on Sep 22, 2009 7:00 PM MDT reply actions  

It’s like Reverse-Stockholm Syndrome, where we start empathizing with the inmates. Not Natural. = )

I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok.
Shaquille O'Neal

by tannji on Sep 22, 2009 8:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

It's more of you guys actually being ridiculed in the MSM

that you somewhat understand what Raider fans go through. Although reading some of the posts on this site and Arrowhead Pride we get it the worst. I made a new game. Everytime I go to either one of your sites and see in the comments section of each post something about the Raiders I take a shot. I can only do it on the weekends though because if I do it during the week I would never make it into work in the morning.

by Raider76 on Sep 22, 2009 9:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

LOL

Yeah, it’s tough for us too. We all picture you as orange gremlins at normal times. It’s tough to realize you guys are nice, smart people. :-)

by Raybin on Sep 23, 2009 6:46 AM MDT up reply actions  

Raybin and Saint

  It is good of you to come and do this for us. You are appreciated. I have a question for you:

  It was said by Gruden and Kiffin that the Raiders would do their game planning. Then they would go through their walk through and practice just like everyone else in the NFL. BUT…on Thursday afternoon or Friday Al Davis would call up and change the entire game plan. They said that it was crippling.

  So, my question is this: Have you heard anything about this? I cannot find any links or anything, but it was on “Mike and Mike in the Morning”. If so, what are your thoughts on it?

  Thanks for your time.

Strength and honor

"It's easy to have faith in yourself and have discipline when you're a winner, when you're number one. What you've got to have is faith and discipline when you're not yet a winner." -Vince lombarti

by kybroncomaniac on Sep 23, 2009 8:11 AM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Haleycriesalot_small
Pre-Free Agency Thoughts
Ph_small
2011: MHR I Need Your Help With An Upcoming Post
Zozobra_small
Explaining What "IT" Is that Tebow Has: An Analysis of the Art of Miracles
Pumpkin_small
The risk/reward analysis on drafting RBs earlier vs later
Images-2_small
Calling out IAOFM

Recent FanPosts

Small
A Shot at a Mock
Small
Broncos positions of need – off season 2012
0_1979_ford_f100-sequin_small
My GM box 2.0
Pimp_hand_-_the_pimp_hand_is_strong_in_this_one_small
Questions about the Spread Offense
Small
CHEAP SKATES
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
The Solution
Pumpkin_small
MLBs - what we have and what Fox and Del Rio historically want
Small
It's the most wonderful time of the year!
Small
Mock Offseason 2.0

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

Dadndaughter_small Tim Lynch

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk