Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jim Irsay: We Can Make It Work With Peyton Manning

Thoughts, 28.09.09

Today, I'm going to provide one of the most shocking sights ever to reach the corneas of Man:

Denver_broncos_v_oakland_raiders_ntj1bidohnll_medium

via www3.pictures.zimbio.com

The unwavering fear brought on by a great pass rusher. So wakeless and stifling is it, that the mere sight of his hand will inspire you to, eh, well...

Star-divide

BAD THOUGHTS (MY FINGERS HURT FROM PLAYING MY GUITAR TOO MUCH):

The First: Scoring from within the 20.

The Broncos were in the "redzone" 6 times, but only managed to score a touchdown twice, settling for 3 field goals and failing to score on 4th down all the other times. There's a flipside to this, of course, which I'll get to later, but you need to score more than that. Raiders fans may be crushed when they look at the scoreboard, but I think that team was lucky. The score should have been in the 30's, but they faced a team that's still learning (imagine that, dominating games and still not even being at their best). Expect improvement.

The Second: Injuries.

Unfortunately, you can't really rely on me here, but this is a list of players that (may have) suffered injuries:  Alphonso Smith, an ankle injury, he didn't finish the game; Peyton Hillis, head injury (may be wrong); Ben Hamilton, hamstring (may be wrong); Ryan Harris, shoulder (take a guess what goes in here). Brandon Marshall appeared to be limping slightly after one play and ended up missing the next play (or the one after that). It's probably nothing, but you never know...

The Third: The Broncos had 5 penalties for a loss of 30 yards.

The fourth: I had one worry in the entire game when the Raiders were on offense, and that was when they scored their only points. Keeping them to a field goal was good, but Russell was taking his team down the field on that drive (seriously), handing the ball off (credit to the running backs not the Muffin Man) and connecting on throws when he needed to. It was unnerving to see the Raiders do that, but fortunately it was only one time.

GOOD THOUGHTS (BUT WHO CARES WHEN I CAN HEAR THE SWEET MUSIC IT PRODUCES):

The first: The gameplan.

This, I believe, will be one case where the final score doesn't matter except for who had more points. The team's gameplan was solid: Score points, and then close out the game. While I'd prefer higher redzone-conversion, they got points in the end and then just focused on winning the game. I can't say how much I respect this sort of philosophy. They didn't try to run up the score. They didn't try to dominate the game. They didn't try to be flashy (mostly). They just wanted to get in, score, and get out with a minimum of fuss.

To me, this speaks volumes. I'm probably wrong, but I don't see an arrogant team, I see a team with perspective. With eyes on the long-term goal.
Some teams may see lesser opponents and try to crush them, get some respect or whatever in the league. Not so here (despite the score). They didn't risk making mistakes (or they tried to) and giving away the game, they didn't try to show how great they are, they just did their job. Win the scored when they needed to, they kept their opponent from scoring when they needed to, and then they controlled the clock when they needed to (36:15 versus the Raiders' 23:45).

I love it. This team is a winner. Plain and simple.

The Second: Controlling the time of possession required good running, and they delivered. Buckhalter finished with 108 yards; he had a few long runs (the O-line was opening some holes, and he was racing through them and past the gawking linebackers) and got yards when he had the ball. He did lose some effectiveness in the end of the game, though.
Knowshon was, simply put, effective. He didn't have any long runs, but he almost always got enough (the times he didn't he failed to follow his blockers and was running on 1st and 10 and only got 9) and either ran hard or made a man miss. 89 yards and a touchdown isn't too shabby, and I expect to see more as he makes up for the time he lost in training camp.

The Third: Matt Prater was 3 of 3 from 48 yards, 21 yards, and 24 yards. He also booted several touchbacks. Someone is always asking for his head on a stake, so a performance like this is always good to see, if not because of his contribution to the team but simply for his self-confidence and to continue quietening the naysayers.

The Fourth: For those interested, Marshall had 5 catches for 67 yards;  those fearing he may be losing relevance can rest easy after this game, he played well. Personally,  though, I'd prefer this look: Gaffney had 4 for 39; Graham had 2 for 33; Scheff had 1 for 14; and Eddie had 1 for 4 yards.
Especially in the second half, passing didn't figure high in the gameplan, so I wouldn't make much of these stats.

The Fifth: 16 points in 3 games.

I like that. It's the Raiders, sure, but giving up a mere 3 points to a team that managed to score 31 on you last year is pretty dang good. This defense is stifling opponents. And as the offense begins to gel and force other teams into more and more passing situations, it's going to get even better (although perhaps not Fields, as this may mean he'll be on the field less. According to the Dude, anyway. :| ). Watching the shifting puzzle force Russell into taking a timeout (immediately, I's be addin') is beautiful. Stopping supposed threats (a la McFadden and Bush) for losses is sweet. Watching passes smoothly sailing into their waiting hands is a joy. And seeing the quarterback get hammered is downright amazing.

I love me some neckbeard -- I mean defense. Yeah!

THE RANDOMNESS WITH WHICH MY FINGERS PRESS THE FRETBOARD WHILE MY EYES SKIM THE SCREEN AND PROVIDE YOU WITH SOME OBSERVATIONS, OR: I REALLY MEANT TO SAY DEFENSE:

1. I have to admit, I don't mind wearing costumes. In fact, if I have the excuse for doing so, I'll wear anything. After seeing some of Oakland's fans, though, and I just want to add quickly that I prefer not to comment on another fanbase's attire of choice, but I just have to ask, how silly do they look? There's a certain coolness in wearing something ridiculous and being aware of it, it means you have a sense of humour, but it's something else to dress like that and try to be taken seriously.

2. One of Buckhalter's good runs displayed perfect zone-blocking running. He took his time getting to the hole, and as soon as it opened, burst through it, going for the first down and more. Beautiful.

3. It only took a single minute for Richard Seymour to lose all my respect. After a play, he leaped on Clady's back while he was one the ground.  After some seconds, he finally got off him and tried to take his hair with him, yanking on it aggressively. It was disgusting.  Predicably, Clady immediately tried to get back at him, but the referees eventually calmed him down. I guess Seymour makes a better Raider than I initially thought.

4. This probably means nothing, but it was still cool to see McD going out onto the pitch to high-five Moreno after his touchdown.

5. On Doom's first sack (he had two), he would've tossed his man aside had he not tried to take Elvis with him. As has already been said elsewhere, he's surprisingly powerful for his size.

6. I'm not the first to say this, but sand on a football pitch is hideous.

7. RETIRED!!!! For some guy called Elway. Apparently he was pretty good.

8. DJ led the team with 7 tackles and one forced fumble. And, no, despite how much I talk about him, DJ isn't my favourite player. Honest.

9. The Broncos only punted twice. Both times were in the 4th.

10. The only thing sweeter than hearing the silence in the stadium was hearing the Raiders fans booing their quarterback.

CIAO!

And, now, the second-most shocking thing ever to drift past the human pupil:

Denver_broncos_v_oakland_raiders_wck70-0zkq_l_medium

via www2.pictures.zimbio.com

The reaction of a Raider when a Bronco comes running at him. He becomes so encapsulated with terror, that a rare condition called "Bluritis" develops on his upper, middle, and lower extremities. It's a defence-mechanism, which prevents predators commonly known as Buffoonus commentatorus from identifying their names when they get smacked with a stiff-arm and promptly collapse on their posterior extremities.

Try not to stare too much, it's rather embarrassing.

Poll
Did you read Tempestuous Binary's brilliantly-written analysis of the Browns game?
Are you crazy? Of course I did! I'm his biggest fan!
10 votes
To be honest, no. He kinda sucks at this thing. Just look at all those spelling mistakes. Too many U's man!
5 votes
Hey, is this a trick question? If it is I'm picking the next option, and indicating that I'll be doing so by picking this one.
30 votes
Yus! Trick question! Told you I was good at these things!
20 votes

65 votes | Poll has closed

This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

Comment 26 comments  |  10 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good call on Prater

I will say this though, Prater started well last year and finished poorly, as for sand on the field, while I agree with you, it does remind me of the old AFC west days whem you had all these stadiums like Mile High, Oakland, and San Diego that were combo stadiums that had baseball and football, so you always had the dirt infields in Spetember. Always made for some interesting footing issues.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman

by Broncoman on Sep 27, 2009 9:11 PM MDT reply actions  

Seems like it wasn't just AFL

I remember the Colts playing in Memorial Stadium where the Oriels played, the Redskins & Senators played in RFK….

by SlowWhiteGuy on Sep 27, 2009 9:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

I've been thinking about that myself.

Last year seemed to have been an endurance issue, though. Well, that’s the party line, anyway. We’ll just have to see how this one plays out.

"Hughesy was right."

by Tempestuous Binary on Sep 28, 2009 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

A lot of good observations here TB.

"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough, in the second half you give what's left." – Yogi Berra
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; We grow old because we stop playing." -- George Bernard Shaw
Breaking jaws or the NFL in Oakland who cares? Fall on your pirate’s sword - Ponderosa

by KaptainKirk on Sep 27, 2009 9:54 PM MDT reply actions  

ditto

Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Gonsoulin, Taylor, Little, Wright, Gradishar, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.

by Mike Clark on Sep 28, 2009 8:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

Thanks guys.

Much appreciated.

"Hughesy was right."

by Tempestuous Binary on Sep 28, 2009 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

Very fine and funny write Temp

Guardian of the Gate to La La Land!
Gonsoulin, Taylor, Little, Wright, Gradishar, Atwater, Davis, and Sharpe...
Why are they not in the Hall...I just don't understand.

by Mike Clark on Sep 28, 2009 8:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

oh, you mean a football field

by lolcopter on Sep 27, 2009 10:57 PM MDT reply actions  

he must

pitch is something a baseball player does or something

by dabriza on Sep 27, 2009 11:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

That's how you get the international flavor, yasee

Now, we need a “mate” thrown in for that final tasty mix… where’s Zappa when you need him? ;)

by AllBroncsallday on Sep 28, 2009 10:18 AM MDT up reply actions  

LOL.

The word “field” always reminds me of the wheat fields and untamed grass I’d walk through on the way to my grandparents’ house. Football players have no place in my fields. :p

Besides, pitch is commonly used here in England instead of field, so I’m used to that word.

"Hughesy was right."

by Tempestuous Binary on Sep 28, 2009 3:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

Bad Thoughts: "The Third: The Broncos had 5 penalties for a loss of 30 yards."

This is going to sound pedantic but actually that stat should not be in the “bad” column at all. Let me explain…

In my desperate attempts to get my Madden 10 as realistic as possible I looked up all the complete penalty stats in the NFL in 2008 in order to adjust penalty sliders to the right level..

In doing so I discovered that the average team gives up 5.5 penalties a game for an average total of 38 yards.

So 5 pens for 30 yards is actually below average, and indicates a team that is not committing an excess of penalties.

Obviously you want to see 0 penalties, but that’s not realistic.

Other than that some great points – thank you.

by British Bronco on Sep 28, 2009 9:57 AM MDT reply actions   2 recs

You Scare Me

So…about how far over do you set the Madden Sliders?

When you can do the common things in life in a uncommon way, you will command the attention of the world.
- George Washington Carver

by Kfustud on Sep 28, 2009 10:58 AM MDT up reply actions  

I scare myself

Still working on them, since the patch ( which has really helped).

I’ll let you know when I get them right!

by British Bronco on Sep 28, 2009 11:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

haha, my friends and i were discussing how the game had relatively few flags, given that we’re playing the raiders. then the refs went off and called a few penalties in a row

d’oh!

by lolcopter on Sep 28, 2009 11:21 AM MDT up reply actions  

I actually went and searched for proof after reading this...

And you’re right.

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/penalties-per-game

The Broncos are currently ranked 8th in fewest penalties committed with 5.3. So, 5 isn’t bad at all. Zero isn’t realistic, of course, but ideally, I’d like to see an average of 3, which would be around Seattle’s and San Fran’s averages of 2.7 and 3.7, respectively.

Thanks for enlightening me.

"Hughesy was right."

by Tempestuous Binary on Sep 28, 2009 3:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

lol on costuming...

good call on the pathetic raider fan look. it’s funny because it’s one of those things that works well and is scary and maybe intimidating—when your team doesn’t suck. when your team does suck (and they do), the costume thing just looks sad. i hope everyone caught the shot of “darth raider” with his helmet half way off, sweating profusely and nearly crying in his diet coke. priceless.

it’s kind of like when you see the really scary, dark goth kid at the grocery store buying his toilet paper. i guess you’re really not satan’s spawn after all…

by oxmouth on Sep 28, 2009 1:00 PM MDT reply actions  

Exactly, lol.

It’s a tradition now, I guess, which they refuse to let die despite the lack of success in intimidating other fans (although that place is mighty intimidating, mainly because people are afraid of getting stabbed).

"Hughesy was right."

by Tempestuous Binary on Sep 28, 2009 3:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

the place is also intimidating

because they still play their games on a baseball diamond. who does that? i mean, really, it’s the 21st century and you’re in the NFL. time to spend a couple bucks on a FOOTBALL field.

by oxmouth on Sep 28, 2009 3:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

i LOLed big when I saw vader too

That was one priceless moment!!

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 28, 2009 4:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

costumes
There’s a certain coolness in wearing something ridiculous and being aware of it, it means you have a sense of humour, but it’s something else to dress like that and try to be taken seriously.

Especially when your tear-stained mascara is running down your face. =)

Conversation nonstarters: hoping McDaniels fails, comparing Bears to Broncos, Cutler to Orton, apples to oranges, and casual drinkers to Raiders fans.

by broncosmontana on Sep 28, 2009 4:04 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Haleycriesalot_small
Pre-Free Agency Thoughts
Ph_small
2011: MHR I Need Your Help With An Upcoming Post
Zozobra_small
Explaining What "IT" Is that Tebow Has: An Analysis of the Art of Miracles
Pumpkin_small
The risk/reward analysis on drafting RBs earlier vs later
Images-2_small
Calling out IAOFM

Recent FanPosts

Small
A Shot at a Mock
Small
Broncos positions of need – off season 2012
0_1979_ford_f100-sequin_small
My GM box 2.0
Pimp_hand_-_the_pimp_hand_is_strong_in_this_one_small
Questions about the Spread Offense
Small
CHEAP SKATES
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
The Solution
Pumpkin_small
MLBs - what we have and what Fox and Del Rio historically want
Small
It's the most wonderful time of the year!
Small
Mock Offseason 2.0

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

Dadndaughter_small Tim Lynch

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk