Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Poll of the Week - 1/11/10 - What to get for Brandon Marshall

As we head through the doldrums of 'Re-Loading Season 2010', we'll help pass the time by coming up with a different poll question each Monday morning.  It will always have something to do with the Broncos, or perhaps the website.  One thing I can promise - I am not a huge fan of multiple choice answers - these are designed to make you think, and to make you make a hard choice.

Of course, these polls are created with the knowledge we currently possess - as situations change, we may revisit these questions.

So, without further ado, here's our first Poll of the Week Question -

Poll
Would you trade Brandon Marshall for a 1st-round pick in the 2010 NFL Draft?
Yes
1312 votes
No
723 votes

2035 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 228 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I voted Yes

I really do not see any team give up a 1st AND 3rd, so if someone would offer a first, I’d take it right away.

Bleeding Orange & Blue in The Netherlands

by BroncosNL on Jan 11, 2010 9:08 AM MST reply actions  

I wouldn’t, unless it’s a pick in the higher end of the 1st round. Then I’d consider it. Otherwise, it’s gotta be more than a 1st rounder.

formerly known around these parts as nycbroncosfan

by Douglas A. Lee on Jan 11, 2010 9:23 AM MST reply actions   2 recs

+1000...must be more than a 1st round!

Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.

by boydy2669 on Jan 11, 2010 12:39 PM MST up reply actions  

+1

To be honest, I want to see how this thing plays out (again). If it escalates any further, and we end up at odds with Marshall, then I foresee a trade. And the trade I would look for would be AT LEAST a first rounder, and a higher pick, too. But like I said, I want to see what happens.

I know guys like this only tend to get worse, but I’m hoping for the best.. We all saw how dominant he can be and how great he can be ON THE FIELD, so I am still a Marshall fan for now, but he better prove himself OFF THE FIELD now, or he’s gone. I just don’t get the whole selfish NFL player thing. These guys get paid more money in one ore two seasons than I will probably ever make in my life doing something they (should) love. This is a team sport, to use the old cliche again.

You know, I was just thinking about something. It’s kind of related. What if we… instead of drafting T George Foster in rd. 1 in 2003, which was a good pick I guess, but where is he now, not in Denver, but anyway, what if instead of doing that, we found a way to get Carson Palmer? I think that might have been something great. I just like that guy and I think he could have been our foundation. But let me say something a little more realistic (but barely, I guess). What if, instead of that pick I mentioned with Foster, what if we found a way to land Andre Johnson? I know it’s still a stretch, and I’ve got a better one here in a second, but why couldn’t we have drafted a guy as dominant like Marshall, but with the attitude like someone like Andre Johnson?

The other scenario is what if we got Anquan Boldin instead of Foster? Now, I know, don’t play the ‘what if’ game, but another reason why letting Shanahan go was not such a bad idea was his personnel decisions (also look at what happened with Ashley Lelie and his personal problems). Though I don’t understand why they couldn’t have just stripped him of those duties instead of flat out firing him, but that’s another story. I still really love what I’m seeing from this new Denver team and it’s coaching staff. Or, what about Dwayne Bowe in 2007 instead of that very iffy pick with Jarvis Moss (though I know we needed some kind of pass rush)?

I don’t know, I guess one could sit down and come up with a million scenarios with ‘what ifs’ but I just don’t get things sometimes. I know, you can’t always tell with college players what they will turn into, but you can do a better job of recruiting, can’t you?

Anyway, back to the Marshall thing. Hopefully he’s back next year. But if we let him go, let’s get at least a high first rounder, if not more. We need to replace him, and we need a high first rounder to do that probably.

by NxtYrNvrArrives on Jan 11, 2010 6:39 PM MST up reply actions  

If his differences with the Broncos are irreconcilable, then get at least a 1st for him.

Hopefully at least a couple of teams get in a bidding war with each other so we can get more than just a first for him.

Man is not a rational animal, he is a rationalizing animal.

by MrFNSunshine on Jan 11, 2010 9:27 AM MST reply actions  

ONLY if the problems are unfixable!!

Good luck replacing that kind of talent!
I’d rather trade Champ, what could we get for him from a contender?

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 10:06 AM MST up reply actions  

I'm done with him

I’ve been giving him the benefit of the doubt for several years now. I’m done. I’m done being infatuated with his talent and justifying his attitude. He is just too much of a punk ass and too much of a headache. I have a message to him (I am yelling this to make myself feel better), QUIT DANCIN AND FALL FORWARD!!! DRIVE ME FRICKIN CRAZY MAN!!! I don’t see anyone wanting his attitude on their team so I figure whatever we can get for him is gravy.

All you get from drafting the "best player available" is a team full of good football players.

Cotton McKnight: I'm being told that Average Joe's does not have enough players and will be forfeiting the championship match.
Pepper Brooks: It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em.

by orangeblood on Jan 11, 2010 9:30 AM MST reply actions   2 recs

Glad you’re not Denver’s GM.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 10:18 AM MST up reply actions  

Odd.

I think the Denver GM would be close to orangeblood’s assesment.

Formerly known as HoosierTeacher or just HT.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jan 11, 2010 11:40 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

My choice

I did make the hard choice, John, not because I think it had to come to this, but because I think this situation also warrants just moving on. I do so with the proviso that I don’t care for the new coaching philosophy of an environment of singling out players for public blame. I think that just promotes dissension on the squad and does not make for a stronger team. I think Baltimore is a classic example. A couple of players on last year’s team in Baltimore make my point, Chris McAllister, a former CB and Willis McGahee, a current RB. Neither bought John Harbaugh’s message last year. McAllister was released in the off-season without blame and little fanfare. McGahee came back this year with a new attitude and has been critical to Baltimore’s current run in the playoffs.

My point is that perhaps the dust should clear and McDaniels should see if Marshall and Sheff will return with fresh attitudes. It may be too poisoned now for that to happen and I frankly fault both sides. If so, let’s do cut the ties…. but I don’t necessarily think you will be able to replace either player with the draft choices you get in return. The draft is gambling, pure and simple.

by Baltimore Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 9:31 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

+1

"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" -- Wimpy J. Wellington

by Broncs Cheer on Jan 11, 2010 9:36 AM MST up reply actions  

very well said.

I like the idea of letter some dust settle for sure. One never knows. Maybe we can keep them without too much disruption,,, If not? Of course McD has to win this and every battle so that his system can get a fair opportunity to succeed here. No team has all character players. In no team does everyone like everyone… maybe it can still work. The fact that they (both sides) can’t seem to keep their mouths shut in front of the media doesn’t help.

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 10:12 AM MST up reply actions  

yes the draft is a gamble

but in both players cases, they want to go so let’s be real about this, let’s move on

by quarterhorse on Jan 11, 2010 6:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Brandon Marshall has way too much talent for just a 1st rounder

I still don’t think he’s done yet as a Bronco, so they’ll tender a 1st and 3rd pick for him and if by some miracle a CBA is reached then slap him with a Franchise Tag… We’ll see how he behaves during the OTAs and Mini camps and if things still aren’t looking that well then trade him. There’s a lot of teams out there looking for a wide receiver like him…

by CombatChuk on Jan 11, 2010 9:31 AM MST reply actions  

Franchise should go to DOOM

If they get the CBA fixed. I would much rather use it on a player that wants to play even when he is not padding his stats.

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 9:56 AM MST up reply actions  

There are 2 franchise tags this offseason if no CBA gets done.

Still, don’t you think Doom EARNED a long term contract? It would be bad locker room MOJO not to give Doom a new deal. We’d look cheap like Buffalo and Cincy

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 10:00 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

He did earn a long term contract

BUT, I want to make sure that he can only get it from the Broncos unless the other team gives up 2 1st round draft picks.

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 10:05 AM MST up reply actions  

If the new contract is done by March (something)

Then theres no need to use the franchise tag on Doom…

(in this scenerio)

Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.

by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Jan 11, 2010 10:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Based on Alpshonso Smith, Ayers and Moreno… Do you really want McDaniels making more high picks?

I certainly don’t think he has proven he has an eye for picking top shelf talent.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 10:17 AM MST up reply actions  

Based on one year of evidence

I’m inclined to agree wtih you. However it takes a little more time to properly judge a draft class. I’m with you on Smith. I didn’t mind picking him up but based on this year I just don’t see it happening for the guy but hopefully we’ll be proved wrong. With Moreno and Ayers I’m willing to wait another season before declaring anything on them.

by T.Dot_Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 10:39 AM MST up reply actions  

I’m not saying any of them are BUSTs, but none of them are Clady or Adrian Peterson types either.

There were a lot of rookies in 2009 that were better NFL players in year 1 than our draft picks. That is whom I’m measure our guys against.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 10:58 AM MST up reply actions  

You are also comparing our rookies

to once a generation player in Adrian Peterson and once every 10-20 year player in Clady. These guys are the best of the best the minute they stepped on the field. It is unfair to judge every rookie like they should be a HOF talent. The truth is most 1st rounders are not. You do have valid points about Ayers and Smith not producing but look at players at the same position the last 10 years as rookies and you will find the same results. Defensive players take more than one year to adjust to he NFL and if you ask them to play a brand new position it is unfair to think they will adjust right away. Ayers did a lot of good things this year playing contain OLB. Ayers will be fine he has the physical tools to play OLB in the NFL. He just needs to get in his playbook more so the game will slow down. Once the game slows down he will be very good. I saw plenty positive things out of him his first year. Smith performed well at the beginning of the year and got injured. After he got injured he was never the same. He still deserves more time.

Moreno was just fine considering the Oline he had to run behind. His production is around what I thought he would have his rookie year. I thought he would surpass 1000 yards and he got close. Once the FO fixes the Oline he will show you how talented he is. People around here were loving Mark Ingram after the NC game. People forget Moreno carved up the SEC the same way when he was there.

It is unfair to these rookies to judge them on the scale you do. You cannot compare every player to HOF Talent like Clady and AP. Automatic success in the NFL is not a gurantee and most of the time it takes at least 1 year for players to adjust to the NFL.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 12:19 PM MST up reply actions   2 recs

“Ayers will be fine”

This is exactly the kind of statements that I see again and again at MHR.

I’ve read the same exact phrase about Alphonso Smith. It’s a lot more hope and wind than substance.

You provided some reasoning with Ayers and I appreciate that but does he have “the tools to play OLB”. He never played OLB in college, was never asked to cover TEs, never asked to seal the edge and never asked to rush the QB standing up.

He is a project at OLB. And he sure looked like a project in 2009.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 2:06 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I said he will be fine because I truly believe that

I was a Smith fan at the beginnig of the year but like you said he disappointed big time. However I am not ready to give up on Smith.

I believe he does have the tools to play OLB. In this scheme though he plays OLB and DE just like Doom. He has the strength,size and plays with good leverage to either rush the passer or play contain OLB. He needs to improve in coverage. The OLB in Nolans system is not asked to cover the TE that much. Nolan used a safety much more to cover TE. There is not a lot of DE in a 3-4 scheme that can cover a TE. TE are getting faster and faster every year to the point where you need either a safety or a bigger corner to cover them. I think Nolan should have used Josh Barrett to cover more TE this year becuase he is really good in that role. People think the two OLB in Pittsburgh is the best tandem in the league and niether of they are really asked to cover a TE 1 on1. Just like Nolan when their OLB are asked to drop back it is more in a Zone. OLB are bigger players in a 3-4 scheme so you give up some speed. I also do not think it makes a big difference for him to rush the passer standing up instead of his hand in the ground. He plays almost at the LOS anyways. Doom, Lamar woodley, guys like this played DE thier whole life and are doing fine playing OLB in the NFL. Ayers reminds me a lot of Woodley. Woodley stats from his rookie year are 14 tackles, 4 sacks and 1 FF 0 Passes defended. Ayers 19 takles, 0 sacks, 0 FF, 1TD and 2 Passes defended. Very similar numbers. Woodley also played behind a much better Dline his rookie year and had similar results. I think he is somewhat of a project at OLB but we have great defensive coaching that will help him reach his potential. I see you points on him but he did a lot more good this year then bad. I saw a lot of positive things when I focused on watching him during the game

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 3:33 PM MST up reply actions  

I gotta chime in on Moreno

He lead the NFL (rookies) in yards, and tied for first in TD’s. If I do the math real quick, I’m pretty sure he did ok compared to the other rookie RB’s

by ten_fiver on Jan 11, 2010 3:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Knowshon played fairly well, but still has some learnuing to do.

He wasn’t met in the backfield on every carry. There were times when the hole was there , and he wasn’t decisive, but rather danced in place while waiting to make a move.

by jayrockstone on Jan 11, 2010 3:38 PM MST up reply actions  

He was met in the backfield

more then there was a hole. The interior oline was horrible this year. Moreno will be a much different back when he has an oline he can trust. There were holes there sometimes but you could see he did not trust his oline and I do not blame him. He has over 1160 yards from scrimmage and 9TD. Those are pretty good numbers considering the Oline he played behind. Look what Shonn Greene is doing behind the Jets Oline. Moreno is way more talented than Greene. It shows how important a good oline is in the run game

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 3:57 PM MST up reply actions  

I'm not slamming the guy.

I’m really glad he’s a Bronco. He’ll definately be better with a proper O line. He still has to learn how to take it straight forward. He was doing way better at the end of the season, but he still can benefit from a little more coaching. The dude WILL be a beast in years to come.

by jayrockstone on Jan 11, 2010 4:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Getting the board up until March didn't help the cause of selecting the picks.

Getting the board up in December gives them plenty of time to make good sound decisions. The Smith pick still baffles me and there have been attempts on here to sooth the move by analyst here. I have a hard time with that kind of thinking, especially now when Smith becomes a first round pick at 14. Clearly he has a lot of great playing to do to get to that point even though he is being paid a 2nd rd salary. The point of that is, we could of had a 10/11 and a 14 pick this year. Another thing I hope comes to a screeching halt is the let’s make a deal trading in the middle rounds. McD seemed to be playing partner swap where they all get together and throw the keys in the bowl on the coffe table. Did he get sucked in on some of the trades? I don’t know, but reaching once again for Quinn? Come on McD you can do better than that.

As far as the Marshall plan, I’m all in for having Marshall here for a long time, ut is giving him a huge contract suddenly going to change his outlook on life and the team? There are concerns with him that need to be addressed and only he and McD can work that out. Let’s all hope for the best in this, one way or another.

by bfree2bronc on Jan 11, 2010 1:22 PM MST up reply actions  

You and I see eye to eye on your points above.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 2:10 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes there where a few rookies that showed up in 2009

Cushing, Matthews who both pratically played the same position in the NFL as they did in college which makes their transition easier. I really like both these players before the draft last year. Cushing was the #1 player I wanted on my board. A lot of people on this site did not like him because they though he was a workout warrior and people questioned him using steroids.

Jarius Bryd. I gurantee no one on this site thought this kid would make the impact he did. He is was a steal where he was drafted. I do not think he was in many mock drafts by people on this site. I also think McBath would have had a similar results if he would have played as much as Bryd.

Harvin was a huge question mark but he turned out very good. I think people really questioned his attitude coming out and not his skill set. He proved a lot of people wrong.

Brian Orakpo stats are inflated from the rush LB position he played and the players around him including Haynesworth. He plays with the best DT in the game which helped him alot. If you put switched Ayers and Orakpo you would have similar results.

I think McDaniels and Xanders were hard pressed on last year. He was not hired until late January. He first had to go over his current roster to decide who he was going to keep. Then he had to sign FA and then there was the draft all within the matter of 3 months. That is a lot to do in that time. He has also said the scouts are using a completely different grading scale now to scout players. All the scouts last year were not completely trained in this system the 3 months from the point McD was hired and the Draft was not enough time to teach it. They are not using the same grading scale the Patriots use and the Pats pick always seem to be very good. As bfree mentioned they probably did not have thier board up until March last year. McDaniels has already mentioned that they already have thier board up now which gives them a full 4 months to evaluate it. I think you will see a completely different draft strategy this year.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 1:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Plus...
He first had to go over his current roster to decide who he was going to keep. Then he had to sign FA and then there was the draft all within the matter of 3 months.

…he had to deal with the Cutler thing.

War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles

by bradley on Jan 11, 2010 1:49 PM MST up reply actions  

oh yea forgot about that

lol. He had to deal with a lot within those 3 months.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 1:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Orakpo was a superstar in college and Ayers was a 3 year disappointement and one year wonder.

One is much better than the other and it showed big time in 2009.

I’ll admit I was not a fan of Cushing. I sure was wrong on him. But I was a huge fan of Orakpo and I was right on that one.

Denver never should have been drafting ANYONE at #37 overall. We NEVER should have made that trade.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 2:12 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Orakpo was good in college but not a superstar in college

he was injured a bunch in college also. Yes he had some big games in college but he was far from a superstar. His is a workout warrior for sure. He is a product of playing with a great Dline and playing next to and behind Haynesworth. Yes Ayers was a one year wonder but he was part of a disfuctional team at Tennessee until his senior year which contributed to his strugles.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 3:16 PM MST up reply actions  

Agreed to a point

Orakpo was very good in college but perhaps not a superstar. However he’s got a hell of a motor and it’s disingenuous to suggest that his production is due to Haynesworth’s presence. The guy made plenty of plays this year when Haynesworth wasn’t even on the field.

It's "just" football

by Donkhead on Jan 11, 2010 3:35 PM MST up reply actions  

i'm all for hoping another year will do wonders for these youngsters

the alternative is too disheartening.

Not loving a desperate to save his job coach (with a track record of squandering draft picks) having even more picks…

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 5:06 PM MST up reply actions  

No....

They have people they hire to help in picking new talent. They call them “scouts” and I am sure we could compile a very long list of players people thought would be awesome in the NFL, fact is it’s only a guess, no matter who is doing the guessing. I am sick of people saying the 2009 draft was a bust and that Moreno, Ayers and Smith were wasted draft picks based on only their rookie season. Even the great #7 wasn’t posting hall of fame stats his rookie season.

by Broncanatic on Jan 11, 2010 2:02 PM MST up reply actions  

To clarify

I rarely see anyone say Moreno was a wasted pick. I think most fans think he did okay in 2009. Several even think he was great.

I don’t see many suggest Ayers was a wasted pick either. With him, most of us are waiting for him to improve vs his 2009 play. I’m hoping for much better since I thought his 2009 was a bit disappointing. Again, others think he was decent, some even think good.

Smith – that is a different story. As of today, I think Denver royally screwed up that move. I see very few that think his rookie year was anything other than disappointing (for any number of reasons).

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 2:20 PM MST up reply actions  

and quinn

i’m sick too.

Not that I’m calling anyone a bust as yet. Except for Ayers though I thought we got poor value at each of our early picks. Especially Smith who will never be faster or taller than he is!

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 5:09 PM MST up reply actions  

He'll get resigned to a multi year deal probably around 25 mil guaranteed

His drop off in sacks towards the end cost him some money… But I really want to see him stay in Denver

by CombatChuk on Jan 11, 2010 10:12 AM MST up reply actions  

In the new NFL where passing the ball has become more important than running, you are right that several teams would love to have Marshall. Which is why Denver will get at least a 1 and 3 for his services.

In that bidding war, I think Denver gets another Cutler type deal when/if we trade Marshall. Not many 25 year old HOF type talents available in a trade. Not to mention that signing 1st round picks in 2010 still costs an arm and leg and something teams don’t mind parting with as much as we’d think.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 10:06 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree

If you’re a team that needs a legit #1 WR. There’s no reason to not trade your first rounder. You’re getting a proven commodity at the age of 25. If you’re in the market for a WR it’s a no brainer

by T.Dot_Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 10:41 AM MST up reply actions  

I'm with CC.

I think we could get more than a first rounder for the Beast.

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Why has nobody made a live-action game of Chutes and Ladders? I'd be first in line.

by Troy Hufford on Jan 11, 2010 9:52 AM MST reply actions  

I hope you're right.

With all the drama surrounding Brandon both pre and post season, I wonder if there are any teams willing to part with more than a 1st round pick for him, if that.

by John in Castle Rock on Jan 11, 2010 3:18 PM MST up reply actions  

This looks to be a deep draft...

I think the Broncos could get better value for two or three lower-round drafts.

by Velveeta on Jan 11, 2010 9:53 AM MST reply actions  

If we can get a higher first

We could turn them into multiple lower round picks if we can find someone that wants to trade up.

"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game

RIP Barrel Man - 12/5/09

by DesertBroncoFan on Jan 11, 2010 10:07 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

Agreed.

But I think that works against getting substantial picks in return for Mr. Marshall.

by John in Castle Rock on Jan 11, 2010 3:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Marshall is a HOF talent with 3 consecutive seasons of HOF type production and he is just 25 years old. I wouldn’t trade him for anything less than 2 1st round picks and I’d still think Denver got screwed. But the CBA is what it is which says Denver gets a 1st and 3rd rounder for the guy. So that is what we get.

However, I’d hope no team signs him and he stays in Denver for 2010 for $3MM as a restricted FA. Even if his only goal is 100 catches, that is a goal in line with Denver’s best interests of offensive production. If he is a locker room cancer, it certainly doesn’t show in HIS play.

I’m as scared as any Bronco fan of signing this player long term not knowing how he’ll react to the money. He may continue to be a great performer, but he may also pull a Gerard Warren and get lazy. I’m haven’t the slightest idea and I doubt BM does either. If I was Bowlen, I wouldn’t give BM a long term deal. Not this offseason anyway.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 9:59 AM MST reply actions  

Interesting take

And yes he does show HOF talent levels, but he shows practice squad effort at times. And those times seem to coincide with critical points in games.

He does take plays off, he does give up on tough catches, and he lacks production in the red zone where he typically draws 2 or more defenders. Doing the opposite of all of these are requirements for a HOF career. I don’t think they would let a guy in who has 1000 catches, 9,000 yards, and 50 TDs because they HOF voters would always slam him for the 50 TDs. Oh, and being a locker room cancer hurts too.

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 10:03 AM MST up reply actions  

Practice squad effort? When…

Marshall has more than HOF talent. He has three years of HOF PRODUCTION, which is more than Cutler ever did and look what we got for Jay via trade. Marshall is no doubt a franchise WR, and the franchise tag was in question with Cutler.

I rarely see Marshall loaf. In fact, his all out style of play (running wild) is going to lead to a career of injuries to his legs. Based on his style of play, I believe his prime (the next few seasons) will be spectacular, but brief.

Marshall has proven he wants MONEY above all else and that $$$ is his motivator. If McDaniels doesn’t want this kind of guy on his team, I’d hate it, but I’d understand. I think most teams have guys like BM and that Denver can too, but this is not my team to run and we hired McDaniels to make this kind of call. I’ll defer to him on Marshall.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 10:15 AM MST up reply actions  

There was a 50/50 ball down the left sideline in the PHI game

that brandon made very little effort to go get and bring it down. Those drops too. Sure they were hot passes, but if it hits you in the hands, you gotta catch it. It was like there was a complete lack of focus that day.

I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)

by BroncoInExile on Jan 11, 2010 10:34 AM MST up reply actions  

I saw a character player in Eddie Royal have a BM type Philly game about 10 times this season. Even good players have off days – fewer than most.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 11:00 AM MST up reply actions  

Everyone has their off day

But I question his heart and passion as a teammate. He shoulda fought for that ball like in the Dallas game. It seems he has passion to fight when he’s playing for something. A contact, stats etc. I think his actions over his career has shown his indifference to being great or part of something great unless it specifically serves his purpose.

I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)

by BroncoInExile on Jan 11, 2010 11:31 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

which is it? Did he catch 100+ balls and play great 'for his own purposes'?

or did he play with no passion?
You can’t have it both ways!
Personally I care little for the source of his motivation with production like that!

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 5:12 PM MST up reply actions  

Eddie Royal is not much of a comparison

Based on what we have established we need to compare Marshall to Andre Johnson, Ward, Fitzgerald, Wayne. All top tier talents who play their butts off game in and game out.

Talent wise these guys compare very favorably to Marshall, and each and every one of them outplays him every game that they put on the pads. Even if they are not targeted 20 times a game they play hard every play. IF Marshall had shown that he was willing and able to play up to their level then I would be completely on the side of paying him whatever he wants. Since he has not, then I wish him luck and hope the Broncos get some nice draft picks or players for him.

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 1:00 PM MST up reply actions  

But if he played like

Johnson, Ward, Fitzgerald, and Wayne we wouldn’t be having this conversation because he’d have already been offered and signed a new contract w/ Denver.

It's "just" football

by Donkhead on Jan 11, 2010 3:41 PM MST up reply actions  

Excellent point

I gotta argue one point though: I don’t think they are that similar talent wise. Marshall has the most physical talent of the bunch (Andre is close). My beef is that he isn’t the football player those guys are. He should be dominating those guys, but he isn’t.

by ten_fiver on Jan 11, 2010 4:00 PM MST up reply actions  

desire... he lacks desire... to enforce his will consistently

I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)

by BroncoInExile on Jan 11, 2010 4:43 PM MST up reply actions  

he does play like them.

when did this ‘not playing hard’ issue come up? It’s complete BS. Don’t like him off the field ok. On the field? He’s a beast!

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 5:14 PM MST up reply actions  

I'm curious...and just thought of this..

Kyle was ZIPPING those balls to Bmarch in the philly game with a little more zest than I’d seen all season. Is it possible they had exchanged words…or Bmarsh had said something about not caring anymore in the vicinity that it was heard before the game? and if so…could this have lead to HCMcD Benching Marshal and questioning his integrity?

I am of the belief that to question the integrity of your player something big has to happen…so I’m thinking its possible that Orton had a grudge on Bmarsh at Philly.

He was throwing hearder against Bmarsh than I had seen him throw all season, and the Marshmellow couldn’t get them to stick to his fingers.

Anyways I’m just trying to rationalize the un-rationalizable….u know…to make myself feel like there really is more to this than it seems…..but I am sure there is not….alas.

"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison

"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble

by DenBronx on Jan 11, 2010 2:48 PM MST up reply actions  

KC game, Raiders game, Philly game

Just to name 3, and yes I know he didn’t play in the KC game, that hamstring must have been killing him…

Look, I understand that you are not a supporter of McDaniels and Xanders, on the other hand, I am a supporter of McDaniels and Xanders. The primary reason I do support them is that they hold players accountable for their actions, or their inaction in this case.

The fact is that bringing Marshall back has little benefit compared to the draft picks we could get for him. Looking at the NFL the only low effort/high talent wide receivers to even make the Super Bowl in the last 10 years is Terrell Owens with Philly. Yes Moss did make it, BUT Moss has become a high effort team player (at least for that year) and he has been less productive more recently.

If I am wrong and you can show me where Marshall has shown that he doesn’t have a 10 cent head and is effectively a possession receiver who doesn’t always want to fight for the ball feel free to explain when/where that happened. Yes he puts up gaudy numbers in yards and catches, yes he CAN be a very effective player, he even is a good blocker! (of course if you outweigh the person you are blocking by 50 lbs that helps) Even with his positives he has a lot of negatives. Similar to what I am seeing produced by you and some of the folks you call out for being useful and right thinking in the mile high report community.

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 10:37 AM MST up reply actions  

“The primary reason I do support them is that they hold players accountable for their actions, or their inaction in this case.”

Do they? I keep hearing about this but then I see a team effort like I saw vs KC and I can’t help but think the players are tuning out their coaches to varying degrees. In fact 2-8 over the last half of the season tells me a lot of the players are not in sync with the coaches.

I believe actions speak much louder than words. The actions I saw from the Broncos to conclude 2009 were not even close to being inline with the words coming for their months.

Below will be the part where several someones chime in about lack of talent excuse. I’ll have an answer for that one as well.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 11:06 AM MST up reply actions  

I do not think the losses were just a talent issue

I think they were an execution issue and that the team was no longer able to surprise anyone.

Once teams got some tape on the Broncos they were able to counter what we were doing. Our players did not then counter what the opponent was doing well enough to prevent mistakes. We also saw a LOT of defensive players out of position consistently, teams sending a receiver up the seam so BDawk had to cover since our LB’s had issues with that coverage area and consistent pressure added up the middle. LOTS of stunts run to the middle of our line by typical outside rushers made an impact.

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 12:06 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes, but they had a lack of talent :)

Just curious what your answer is…..BTW, you know I usually side with you and do here as well.

"Pain don't hurt" - Swayze (Road House) -- We miss you man!

by bonaire on Jan 11, 2010 12:31 PM MST up reply actions  

if they hold folks accountable...

why did coach not call out some of our (loud-mouthed) defenders who stunk it up the last few weeks out there? Who was held accountable for that SAD SAD break down on defense the last 10 games?

I didn’t hear a damn word of accountability from the coach for anyone but himself! (which i appreciate but it hardly makes the point that he holds others accountable)

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 5:20 PM MST up reply actions  

I still don't even trust the FO to use that pick correctly.

So in a trade situation I’d rather receive another player that has proven to be worth something. I.E a Anquan Boldin and a 3rd rounder. Or Josh Cribbs and a 2nd rounder

by CombatChuk on Jan 11, 2010 10:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Totally. I hate the idea of McDaniels with more picks after his botch job on the 2009 draft.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 10:15 AM MST up reply actions  

botch job?

What player do you think he botched on?

Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.

by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Jan 11, 2010 10:27 AM MST up reply actions  

you haven’t read McGeorge very frequently have you?

=)

by Todd Jewell on Jan 11, 2010 10:29 AM MST up reply actions  

I have...

I’m honestly interested in seeing who people really think was bad pickups..

For instance I see above he says "Based on Alpshonso Smith, Ayers and Moreno… Do you really want McDaniels making more high picks?

I certainly don’t think he has proven he has an eye for picking top shelf talent."

However, if you take a few seconds and compare players first years…

Moreno:
Season | Player | | Rushing Receiving Fumbles
| | G | GS | Att | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | Rec | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | FUM | Lost
2009 | Moreno | 16 | 9 | 247 | 947 | 3.8 | 36 | 7 | 28 | 213 | 7.6 | 27 | 2 | 4 | 4
2001 | Tomlinson | 16 | 16 | 339 | 1,236 | 3.6 | 54 | 10 | 59 | 367 | 6.2 | 27 | 0 | 8 | 5
Difference | | 0 | -7 | -92 | -289 | 0.2 | -18 | -3 | -31 | -154 | 1.4 | 0 | 2 | -4 | -1

Ayers is a little harder because besides:

  1. DE to OLB isn’t commonly successful (outside of Ware and looking like Orakpo)
  2. When your behind Doom on the depth chart, hard to get on the field.
    Season | Player | | Tackles Interceptions Fumbles
    | | G | GS | Comb | Total | Ast | Sck | SFTY | PDef | Int | Yds | Avg | Lng | TDs | FF
    2009 | Ayers | 15 | 1 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | — | 0 | — | — | 0
    2005 | Ware | 16 | 16 | 58 | 47 | 11 | 8 | — | 1 | — | — | 0 | — | — | 3

Smith

  1. Remember when your stacked with veteren CBs, playing time (which also is improvement time) is sometimes hard to come by.
    Player | | Tackles Interceptions Fumbles
    | G | GS | Comb | Total | Ast | Sck | SFTY | PDef | Int | Yds | Avg | Lng | TDs | FF
    Smith | 15 | 0 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — | 0 | — | — | 0
    Bailey | 16 | 16 | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 55 | 11 | 59T | 1 | 0
    Asomugha | 15 | 1 | 28 | 20 | 8 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | — | 0

Now I’m not saying they can’t play/get better, I’m just saying we need to give the players a chance to improve before making snap judgements. (sorry about the formatting, this was quickly thrown together)

Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.

by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Jan 11, 2010 10:56 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I thought Moreno was okay as a rookie. Not a bad pick at all. Lots of upside.

I think Ayers is a 4-3 player so I don’t get that pick. Doesn’t seem like a good fit on Denver’s D. If he could cover TEs, I’d feel better, but the guy was a DE/DT in college. He’ll never be a good cover TE because he is not built for it. His lack of impact plays in 2009 was a bit alarming.

Alphonso Smith should be playing for another NFL team and Denver should have the 14th overall pick in the 2010 NFL draft. His 2009 stat lines are a lot of 0, 0 & 0. Stats similar to most rookies that never make an impact in the NFL.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 11:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Smith had 5 tkl 7 asst's

I’m with you on Smith McGeorge, but I will give McD the benefit of the doubt because of the short time frame he had to study the boards. And besides he acquired Goodman and had Bailey. Williams was here and IMO did a pretty good job in the slot. McD wants his players and eventually they’ll all be gone. Ayers hasn’t showed us why he should deserve a 18 pick, but neither has T Jackson for the Chiefs at 3.

by bfree2bronc on Jan 11, 2010 1:32 PM MST up reply actions  

This is easier...

Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.

by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Jan 11, 2010 11:16 AM MST up reply actions  

Just noticed when I posted this is cut off a huge portion.

So it’s fixed now and you can see it bigger @
Player Comparison Chart

Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.

by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Jan 11, 2010 8:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Bad picks – and this is the way I felt right after the 2009 draft.
Ayers, Smith, Quinn & Olsen

Good ones:
Moreno, McBath, Bruton, Bradstater, McKinley, Schuleter.

After 2009.
Bad picks: Smith, Schuleter
Good ones: Moreno, McBath, Bruton

Too early to tell: The rest. I have very little opinion on the guys that only played in preseason but for what it’s worth (not much)

Leaning toward good on Bradstater and McKinley.

Leaning toward bad on Ayers, Quinn and Olsen (I can’t believe he didn’t get some PT behind Hoch and Ben).

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 11:20 AM MST up reply actions  

This makes sense

The only difference is I lean towards good on Ayers. Yes he was a 1st rounder, and more production would have been nice, but the change of position and the fact that later in the season he was around the ball a LOT (at least I saw 56 there a LOT) makes me lean towards good.

I also think at this point Smith falls under “bad” but he could very easily become “good” or even “acceptable” over the next couple of seasons

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 11:50 AM MST up reply actions  

I don’t see a 3-4 OLB when I watch Ayers. He looks like he’d be a better 4-3 DE to me.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 2:21 PM MST up reply actions  

I'd agree with that,

he was a 4-3 DE at Tenn. I thought this was a huge reach on Denver’s part. While he had a few good moments in 2009, for the most part he looked out of place. Now could he have a breakout year after another year in the system. Maybe….but, I still wonder…

"A great pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do" Walter Gagenot
"Hope sees the invisible, feels the intangible and achieves the impossible."

by bchiper on Jan 11, 2010 3:15 PM MST up reply actions  

square pegs

If you understand how the 49ers defense operates (or did when Nolan coached there) then you would know that he’s an elephant. Parys Haralson is the model. There are other similar schemes that use different terminology, such as the term predator and a few others I can’t recall, but Ayers’ somatotype fits perfectly with this position. The original prototype was Charles Haley. Another prototype was Karl Mecklenburg.

This topic was discussed extensively around a year ago in topics related to hybrid schemes.

no goats, no glory.

by Colinski on Jan 12, 2010 12:15 AM MST up reply actions  

Yes, to my knowledge

Cushing played elephant, too. I’m aware that Mathews was used for his pass coverage abilities but I won’t pretend to understand the finer points of their scheme.

I should have put this up, too.

USC is a good model for understanding the elephant position and I thought about posting something about them but refrained. The article linked above is an exceptional piece in terms of teaching the ideas behind the elephant’s use. Also, notice that the position is a hybrid, it’s neither a true OLB34 nor a DE43.

no goats, no glory.

by Colinski on Jan 12, 2010 9:32 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree Marshall is worth more then just 1st rounder

I also think he worth at least 2 1st and possibly a 3rd rounder on top of the 1st. He is worth that with his talent. We will get at least a 1st and 3rd and if we do not he will be a bronco next year. I am also a little worried about what type of player he will be once he gets paid. I think he will be fine and still put up huge numbers but he could shut it down and get lazy

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 1:37 PM MST up reply actions  

I’m just assuming he’s gone…

So for me, the question is how much can we get for him?

by Velveeta on Jan 11, 2010 5:59 PM MST up reply actions  

I voted yes

But I think we could get more for him. Looking at what Dallas got for Roy Williams who didn’t even show the level of talent that Marshall did I think that someone out there will look at Marshall and think that they can get him in line.

And because of his talent I think that multiple teams will offer a 1st, then we just have to see which one will offer a 1st with something else we want. 1st and 3rd? 1st, 6th, and a solid player? 1st next year, 3rd this year and a solid player? Lots of potential options here.

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 10:00 AM MST reply actions  

Very hard

to trade a top flight WR in today’s NFL, esp. one that is looking for a whole lot more money (i.e., Chad Johnson & A.Bolden). I think we will be very lucky indeed to get a first; hoever, I agree with a previous comment that even then we are unlikely to turn that pick into a player nearly as talented as BM.

As in previous situations we’ve seen the last 12 months, I think it would be in both side’s long-term interest to ignore their pride and work things out. While I’m wishing for the impossible, I would also like to win the lottery and be 18 again!

by Elway's Ghost on Jan 11, 2010 10:02 AM MST reply actions  

Whidbey, Combat Chuk, Balt Bronco.

Let me just say how very glad I am to see some constructive and thoughtful dissenting voices at MHR. IMO, this site needs more of THESE types of voices to challenge McDaniels and Co.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 10:26 AM MST reply actions  

Why

You act like you 4 are the only ones on this site that are critical of the Broncos and the only people that bring anything thoughtful to this site. You guys call everyone Homers and Kool aid drinkers because you can not see the other side and think you are 100% correct most of the time. There is a difference between being constructive and being hateful and the people you mention above cross that line often. You act like the only people that bring anything good to this site are people that think excatly like you which is the farthest thing from the true. Just because some people put a positive spin on their thoughts does not make them wrong. I am not hating on you guys because you do bring good insight sometimes but you also have hateful post just as much.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 1:50 PM MST up reply actions   2 recs

No. But I see too many that question, object, anti, etc McDaniel posters get into name calling or throwing around BS (we traded a two 3rd round picks for Quinn) like they have a handle on facts when in fact they don’t.

These three seem to know what they are talking about vs other stuff I’ve seen from the mob.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 2:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Typo?

The Broncos did trade two third round picks (#79 and #84(via Bears)) overall for Pittsburgh’s second round pick.

I wasn’t wild about that one.

So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson

by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 11, 2010 2:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Also we traded

2 3rd round picks for the last pick in the 2nd and a 4th rounder.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 3:41 PM MST up reply actions  

Ahh...

…so we got a 4th out of the deal…I forgot that.

I was mighty attached to those 3rd’s, though.

So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson

by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 11, 2010 3:42 PM MST up reply actions  

And you are a Kool Aid drinker when it comes to McDaniels.

Me – I don’t like the taste of that drink as much as most at MHR.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 2:26 PM MST up reply actions  

I am far from a Kool Aid Drinker

I have been critical of McDaniels multiple times during my time at MHR. I just have a more postive outlook on things then you and the people you mention do. I was not in the 13-3 crowd at the beginning of the year. In fact I predicted between 8-10 wins and that is where we ended up. Just because I am more positive then you does not make me a kool aid drinker. I agree there are some folks here that do nothing but support the team and are never critical of McDaniels or the players but I am not one of them

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 3:37 PM MST up reply actions  

It's the same old song and dance

There’s no difference between being a “homer” and being McGeorge. They both have the blinders on and will do anything to back up there arguments. It’s a losing battle Gnarly.

by ten_fiver on Jan 11, 2010 4:08 PM MST up reply actions  

you have a good point

I think everyone brings something to the discussion from their own point of view. It is good to understand everyone point of view but the discussions go to far on MHR sometimes.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 4:16 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't see it as being hateful

This season per McDaniels goal (Win) was failure (by his own standards we ended up being a .500 team). So I’m just baffled by everyone who calls out any constructive criticism on this team. It’s not like it’s blatant trolling…

by CombatChuk on Jan 11, 2010 3:35 PM MST up reply actions  

I never said you were a troll.

If you were a troll I would not have said you bring insighful thought to this site sometimes. The Negative vs Koolaid drinking crowd has been very active here at the end of the season. You 4 were more on the negative side. I think there is a differance between constructive criticism and being hateful against the coach. There is a thin line and you and others cross it sometimes and that is when arguements start between people like you and the kool aid drinkers

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 3:40 PM MST up reply actions  

I like to think of myself as a realist

You can’t get better without looking at what went wrong. I think a lot of things went wrong over the course of the season. The 2009 draft has been one giant question mark (I see good potential with Moreno, McBath, Bruton, Brandstater, and Olsen). Contrary to what you think I do think the McDaniels was the correct replacement for Shanahan, I just want to point out (What I thought were mistakes) because I want to see the Broncos succeed. Who knows if I’m right (I’m an Electrical Engineer) but I like to call it as I see and discuss it with facts and statistics if possible.

by CombatChuk on Jan 11, 2010 3:57 PM MST up reply actions  

That is good, I enjoy intelligent football discussion as long as people can see both sides

I also agree that you can’t get better without looking at whats wrong. I just think some people are to hard on rookies. Look at some of the stars of this league and almost none of them did anything their rookie years. It takes time adjust to the NFL. The playing time our rookies got was great because it will help them adjust faster but the size and speed of the NFL is so much different then college. Moreno and Ayers played in the closest thing to the NFL in the SEC and I see a ton of upside in both. I think Moreno, Ayers, McBath, Bruton are all future starters. I think Moreno and Mcbath were our best rookies. I see in the rest of our rookies. They are far from bust.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 4:04 PM MST up reply actions  

I really want Ayers to succeed

He’s essentially the missing part of the Pass rush… I just hope he adjusts to dropping back in coverage so we don’t have to substitute as much on the defense.

by CombatChuk on Jan 11, 2010 4:06 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree that he needs to adjust better when dropping back in coverage

I am willing to give him more time then others because he was really never asked to drop in coverage at Tennessee. It is a lot to learn for someone who has never done it before. I think he played LB in High School but there is a big difference. I do not think Nolans system asks the OLB to cover TE one on one but would love for someone who watches a lot more game tape to cover that. I think the OLB Nolans scheme are asked to do more Zone coverage and are rarely asked to cover any TE one on one. It is a completely different position then a SLB in a 4-3 from what I watched this year.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 4:13 PM MST up reply actions  

The only coach I'm hateful towards is George Karl of the Denver Nuggets

If George Karl had a fraction of McDaniels’ passion they would be an unstoppable team.

by CombatChuk on Jan 11, 2010 4:06 PM MST up reply actions  

I wouldn't call any regular around here trollish...

…but there is a tendency for the more critical crowd to brush off the rest as delusional, impractical homers— as if the base root of that group’s critical nature is its firmer grasp of reality and higher plane of understanding.

Ironically, some of the most positive poster’s around here seem to be the one’s that weren’t guzzling the Cutler/Shanahan kool aid— so maybe the worm has simply turned. Some of us weren’t nearly as impressed with the team McD inherited, so ‘positive’ might simply be re-spun as realistic, if we were to be so smug. Its a point of view thing, I guess— and perhaps not so tied to the negative labels so routinely stuck on the positive thinking crowd.

So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson

by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 11, 2010 3:58 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Good Post.
but there is a tendency for the more critical crowd to brush off the rest as delusional, impractical homers— as if the base root of that group’s critical nature is its firmer grasp of reality and higher plane of understanding.

This is what I was getting at. I also agree that some people were not very impressed with the team McDaniels took over. I know we were 8-8 in 2008 but we were closer to a 4-12 team in my opinion. I think we are closer to a 10-6 to 12-4 team this year. We still have some issues but not nearly as much as this team did in 2008. I think McDaniels could have done a better job but I think he did a good job overall with what he had to work with.

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 4:09 PM MST up reply actions  

P'Orange

You are being a delusional, impractical homer….(apparently I can’t seem to add anything constructive today so I am being impish……darn those pain meds!!)

"Pain don't hurt" - Swayze (Road House) -- We miss you man!

by bonaire on Jan 11, 2010 6:00 PM MST up reply actions  

sounds more like you're the hateful one! lol

I think you’re way off on all points above. I honestly try very hard to see both sides. It seems like you kool-aiders (I couldn’t resist) are the ones who only see one side!

For the record I was won over after the New England game and I haven’t been hating on the coach (as I could have) after things fell apart. I know how very hard it is to win in this league! I have though, been consistently uneasy with coaches talent in the draft (as opposed to his excellent work via free-agency thus far) and his ability to handle ‘personalities’. I’m REALLY hoping he’ll improve in these aspects (or that I’m simply wrong). Otherwise I look forward to drafting a young QB and watching McD coach him up and build around him.

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 5:31 PM MST up reply actions  

I said no

only because I want more than a first. I’d also trade for Cribbs and a second. Realistically there’s not many better than Marshall at his position. Fitzgerald and Andre Johnson. Then who? If last season taught us anything it’s that there aren’t too many teams willing to part with a first rounder for a WR.

by T.Dot_Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 10:36 AM MST reply actions  

Oooo, good point

So, looking through the WR’s in the NFL I would argue that the following are better than Marshall.

Welker, Fitgerald, A. Johnson, Moss, Jennings, Steve Smith (Both), Ward, Wayne, V. Jackson, Colston, C. Johnson.

The above are all players who put out significantly more effort consistently. I am NOT arguing more talent, just that if you offered me any of the above straight up for Marshall I would take that as a HUGE win for the Broncos.

I am probably not perfect, I am no scout or NFL expert like John Clayton (sic), but I just don’t see why we have to love a half-assed effort player who cannot show us that he can play to his talent level all the time.

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 10:48 AM MST up reply actions  

I should have stated my case better

I’m talking about talent level. Those are all legit #1 WR’s minus Welker who is a whole different kind of beast. Talent wise though Marshall beats most of those on the list.

Secondly I’m all for trading him. Heck I’d trade him straight up for most of the dudes on your list but that’s not going to happen. The point I’m making is we’d better get more than a number 1 for him.

by T.Dot_Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 11:06 AM MST up reply actions  

I also needed to say

Cribbs+ 2nd = HELL YES, but I don’t think it will happen.

by Arimaris on Jan 11, 2010 11:51 AM MST up reply actions  

Cribbs and a 2nd?

Not nearly enough in my eyes. Cribbs is a good player, particularly on STs, but he’s an average receiver that’s way too much like what we already have. They tried to make Dante Hall in KC a receiver too and it just didn’t work (Hester in Chicago?).

It's "just" football

by Donkhead on Jan 11, 2010 3:52 PM MST up reply actions  

I voted yes

But I would just as gladly take 2 second round picks. I’m in the get the most out of him as you can camp. I’d also take Boldin straight up and pay Boldin instead.

I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)

by BroncoInExile on Jan 11, 2010 10:37 AM MST reply actions  

Marshall is a game changing player with franchise written all over it.

Do you honestly trade an individual like Marshall? Does it make sense? Will he stop his shananagans once he get’s paid? These questions and more can only be answered by Brandon. Honestly if his issues are only about money then pay the man and get on with restructuring the team. Then what happens when all of this money goes to his head and Marshall reverts back to the old marshall we are so well acquainted with? Then we start over again. I personally don’t know all of the issues with Marshall and neither does anyone else on here, what we have gathered is this. The team captains had a meeting with the McDaniels on Monday morning before the Chiefs games and expressed their feelings about accountability, that’s when McD opening said that some of the players weren’t being accountabe to the team. This came when asked about Marshall and Scheffler. Aparently these two had put them selves first ahead of the team and their teammates.

Not to get into any arguing session here it is best for me to stand down a let you all fight it out. I would trade Marshall in a minute and bet that the phone has been ringing off the hook. We’ll get a Cutler type deal for him and move on.

by bfree2bronc on Jan 11, 2010 10:40 AM MST reply actions  

agreed on all points except that i wouldn't 'want' to trade him

Sadly looks like it’s time.

Time to hold some other players accountable too though.

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 5:35 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't see what has changed

Denver apparently couldn’t find any takers last off season. Marshall produced at a predictable level consistent with his undoubted talent; and he sprinkled in a suspension and a controversial incident at the end of the season.. In other words, the cipher that is the Beast remains exactly the same guy with exactly the same variables as last year. I don’t see why teams are going to start beating down a door that didn’t appeal to them last year. Pretty much nothing has changed.

I wouldn’t trade him. I’d high tender him and leave open the option of evaluating any offer he gets. It gives BM the closest opportunity for FA he can get right now (appeasement), while giving Denver the opportunity to evaluate cost/benefit while not impulsively giving up on a premier talent. Its all about money, nothing else. I don’t think BM is lying when he says he respects the coach and I don’t think the coach is so delusional as to give up on a uniquely talented guy unless he absolutely has to (insanely steep financial parameters). So let him test the market and see what the market bear. If its too steep considering the risk, take the picks. If its reasonable, then match, and BM can’t say that he is getting totally screwed. Everybody is as happy as they can get…even if it isn’t a perfect world for either side.

Football teams aren’t any different from real life— while the good debate operates in the extremes, the real stuff takes place among the finer shades of gray.

So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson

by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 11, 2010 10:55 AM MST reply actions   2 recs

true

Man is not a rational animal, he is a rationalizing animal.

by MrFNSunshine on Jan 11, 2010 11:04 AM MST up reply actions  

Hey John

It’s 2010, not 2009. Yeah, I forgot too…haha

formerly known around these parts as nycbroncosfan

by Douglas A. Lee on Jan 11, 2010 11:07 AM MST reply actions  

LOL

2009 is so ingrained in me I didn’t even notice. ;)

Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.

by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Jan 11, 2010 11:11 AM MST up reply actions  

Many would say the key to Marshall's value is his off-field issues and on-field attitude..

I would argue that his value lies in consistency and youth. We all know Brandon has 100+ catches and 1100 + yards the last three years, but to me it’s important to note that during this last season, those numbers were acheived in a new system, with a new coach, oc, and new qb. I would guess that his consistency is weighed heavily by any teams looking for a WR.

At the time of his trade, Roy Williams was shorter, lighter, a year older, far less consistent, never had 100 catches and has only had a 1000 yard season once in his career. Perhaps more importantly, though, is that he never proved an ability to perform at a high level in a new system. Brandon has. And teams will notice that and should feel confident in what they are buying.

I doubt most agree, but IMO Marshall’s value should be two first rounders so long as he keeps his mouth shut between now and then.

by Alex on Jan 11, 2010 11:18 AM MST reply actions  

Jeff Legwold's analysis of Marshall's worth (as reported in Horse Tracks 1/7/10

http://www.denverpost.com/premium/broncos/ci_14136532

It’s a good read.

War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles

by bradley on Jan 11, 2010 11:19 AM MST reply actions  

That is an excellent article.

The Great Brandon Marshall Derby will never materialize. Its wishful thinking on behalf of pick-crossed fans and BM himself.

So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson

by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 11, 2010 11:35 AM MST up reply actions  

That's why I voted yes on the poll

War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles

by bradley on Jan 11, 2010 11:39 AM MST up reply actions  

ditto

or thritto….

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 11, 2010 7:56 PM MST up reply actions  

One other thing to consider...

Compelling evidence exists (Alphonso Smith) to suggest that Denver wasn’t wild about the idea of paying two-first round picks in back to back years. Its not all together a different financial risk to pay an unproven kid than it is to pay a proven, if not volatile, veteran producer.

I think these things are far to often viewed in a vacuum, or to steal an apt analogy by Sayre, through a straw.

So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson

by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 11, 2010 11:21 AM MST reply actions  

I have been a huge proponent...

of this – that the reason the Broncos traded a 1st for a 2nd was just that – financially motivated in some way. It was still risky, and still open to large amounts of criticism, unless Smith works out.

-TSG

SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport

Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605

Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!

by John Bena on Jan 11, 2010 11:45 AM MST up reply actions  

There is no doubt...

…that if you read up on all the details of the Shanahan ouster, its genesis seemed to be with Joe Ellis, who was concerned about Shanahan’s free-wheeling financial ways. The ouster of the Goodman’s for a GM like Xanders— who’s pedigree is in capology rather than personnel— further suggests that the Broncos are moving towards a different financial philosophy. Its not so much that they wan’t to be cheap, but rather smarter and more financially prudent. IMO, AS was all about getting a player that they rated with a 1st round grade (for better or worse; and still to be determined) for second round money. It was also consistent with a philosophy that values the back end at a higher level than the conventional wisdom. There was no impulse about it— it was a combination of the opportunity for financial prudence combined with schematic philosophy.

Thus, I don’t think the Broncos have a problem with Brandon Marshall, per se. They have a problem with the risk of Brandon Marshall, and I really have a hard time believing that Denver is unique in seeing that risk. I think if he’s traded, it going to be a pre-set sign-and-trade for an established veteran than can help fill a Denver need.

So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson

by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 11, 2010 12:07 PM MST up reply actions   3 recs

You got it PO

Not only did the financial contexts governing the NFL (rookie payscales, retired player benefits(lack thereof), free-agent escalation) trend into the stratosphere (the numbers are positively boggling, so boggling that we are pretty much numb to them….) but the reality within which that context is relevant, the american economy, has been tanking.

The result will drive the forward thinkers to be more efficient, starting with money. The legacy of the NFL will be its coaches, some of the greatest football and sports minds to ever field teams. The goal right now should be to create a much more efficent system for personnel procurement and retention, and use the time that buys to DEVELOP Super Bowl caliber teams. It took a long time for the other shoe to drop after the advent of the CBA which is about to run out (is that irony?) but drop it has. Players will still be considered great, but there will be a hell of a lot more coaching and development going on in the league… methinks Al Davis is screwed.

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 11, 2010 8:04 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

+1...This is exactly the Big Picture that needs (will?) to come pass from the lockout / new CBA

Good call Jeremy, as usual!

-Richee
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!

by BroncoSense72 on Jan 12, 2010 8:04 AM MST up reply actions  

You "Get It" PO

-Richee
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!

by BroncoSense72 on Jan 12, 2010 8:01 AM MST up reply actions  

Didn’t Carolina trade their 1st round pick for a 2nd last year? That one barely got noticed or questioned in the MSM. John is right, it was a risky move, but I can understand the financial implications too for Denver. I will be very interested to see how Smith turns out for us. I just hope this wasn’t the real Smith we saw in 2009.

by BroncoTwins on Jan 11, 2010 12:17 PM MST up reply actions  

We're under the microscope more because we have had success where Carolina hasn't.

We’re expected to to be successful having 2 trophies in the closet. I hope Smith has a year that has all of the msm scratching their heads, I just don’t see it happening.

by bfree2bronc on Jan 11, 2010 1:41 PM MST up reply actions  

That Carolina trade got killed in the MSM. Killed by Clayton, Lombardi, King, etc.

It was a terrible trade for Carolina exept that their 2nd rounder played much better than ours.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 2:30 PM MST up reply actions  

Everette Brown had an ok season

22 tackles 2 sacks and 2 FF. nothing great

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 3:45 PM MST up reply actions  

I will be the 1st to say I think financial motives may well have played a roll in this trade.

And that makes me sad because it means Bowlen is getting cheap over doing the best/right thing for his franchise.

The risk we took doing the Alphonso Smith deal was extensive. The reward was in question the entire time.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 11, 2010 2:29 PM MST up reply actions  

the "cheap" perspective

the NFL is changing McGeorge, just like it did when free agency was introduced. In the new NFL, owners and their personnel strategies will need to come to terms with efficiency.

Cheap implies that something should be worth more, but that Bowlen refuses to pay the honest price for it. I think what is really going on is that things have ridiculously inflated values and asking prices, and Bowlen, and other owners are looking for ways to only have to pay what things are worth.

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 11, 2010 8:13 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I think yes is the correct answer.

Let’s face it. Marshall has been nothing but trouble. His legal past and his antics have been enough since he’s come to Denver. Choosing when to show up to practice and whether to participate in team acticivities is more of the same from Marshall. He doesn’t want to be here, and doesn’t seem to have the support of the coach, the management, or the players.

At this point, the only people who seem to support Marshall are the folks who have been on a mission to fault McDaniels, or folks who think that a star player with a thug mentality can better a team in the long run. They make the same tired arguments about draft picks, McDaniels, and everything EXCEPT Marshall’s “me first” attitude. Thankfully, it looks like Marshall AND the Broncos will get their way, and rid themselves of the relationship.

I would take a first round pick for Marshall. I would also take a lot less, given that “the player” doesn’t want to be here. Remember that Marshall refused to discuss any desire to stay in Denver, and this was weeks ago (before his latesst stunt).

Formerly known as HoosierTeacher or just HT.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jan 11, 2010 11:51 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

I find it interesting the 2 people McDaniels has had the most trouble with (at least publicly) are Cutler and Marshall – the biggest “me-first” players on the team last year.

Speaking of McDaniels, if we had went 10-6 and made the playoffs, would people be bashing him for being too emotional or would they call him “fiery and passoniate”? Funny how winning changes perceptions, huh?

by BroncoTwins on Jan 11, 2010 12:12 PM MST up reply actions  

Agreed.

Formerly known as HoosierTeacher or just HT.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Jan 11, 2010 12:13 PM MST up reply actions  

"Winning answers a lot of questions" - coach Josh McDaniels

This statement was made by McD early in the season.

I gained a lot of comfort from this for 6 games. Then things changed and I felt compelled to think about the other side of this point. So my alternate quote is this – “Losing creates a lot of questions”.

by oncobronco on Jan 11, 2010 1:12 PM MST up reply actions  

define 'most trouble'

I might want to factor in production! So he’s got a bunch of guys who don’t say BOO but also don’t play worth a damn or show ANY HEART when it matters? I can’t stand the Me-first attitude of sports stars either but it’s a reality. There must be something in between eh?

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 5:42 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree that Marshall needs to go

I only think his value is higher than most others seem to think. Also, I don’t really care what Brandon wants, or what has happened in the past, only that the team gets the best deal possible. Personally, I’d like to see a team like Baltimore trade a lineman or two rather than high draft picks.

by Alex on Jan 11, 2010 12:41 PM MST up reply actions  

I think your post here

is a bit of a cheap shot, but I certainly understand everyone’s frustration with Brandon. I don’t really “support Brandon” as much as I support the Broncos and want to make sure the team gets full value for the talent. I’m on no “mission to fault McDaniels” but do believe it was a mistake on his part to take the end of the year blow-up public, whether Brandon was doing so or not. There are going to be problem players, prima donnas, etc. on every team and it’s up to coaching and management to make it work for the sake of winning ballgames or if it’s decided that it’s all impossible, then maximizing the return on your current investment. I would not take “a lot less” for Brandon because I don’t think that’s in the team’s best interests – just my two cents though.
Go Broncs!

It's "just" football

by Donkhead on Jan 11, 2010 4:27 PM MST up reply actions  

I'd take a first

but I agree with everyone who says that Marhsall is worth more.

In an ideal world he’s worth the same as (or even more than) Roy Williams he was traded for a 1-3-6. So Marshall has to be worth at least that if not a bit more. But since everyone knows he won’t be a Bronco next year, there’s no way you’ll get a deal like that. The only way that Broncos get any more than a 1st or a 2nd and conditional pick in 2011 is if two teams will get into a bidding war but at the moment, if any team came in and offered a frist – no strings attached – right now I’d take it.

by mikebirty on Jan 11, 2010 11:52 AM MST reply actions  

Sorry Everyone

I guess I get frustrated too, but I shouldn’t call anyone a Raiders lover. That’s worse than being both a rapist and pedophile.

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Jan 11, 2010 12:09 PM MST reply actions  

Funny, I remember when everyone was loving the beast

and demanding he be paid. Look back on the game posts when he was the only one that could catch the ball. funny how this last game made everyone turn on him once again.
Agree with all about the beast being a little bit dramatic and all but we all know it is all about his contract and always has been about the money.
3 100 yard seasons in a row, not bad, not that many WR do that in their first 4 years. But I am sure we can pick up a WR to fill his place.
Would be really interesting to look at Ortons numbers minus the beast. Would loved to have seen some of those games without him in there, I am sure we would have done much better this year without him. Funny how we are saying it was a team failure during our complete melt down but now it must have been the beasts fault.
One thing that is good here is that none of us are going to make the decisions on who will be on this team. Thank God for that and as the old saying goes “be careful what you wish for”….

by pwsbronco on Jan 11, 2010 12:23 PM MST reply actions  

I Don't Hate Marshall

Deep down, I believe he really is a good guy. Perception is reality, sadly, to most people but if he and McDaniels can possibly patch things up, I’ll take him back. When he’s right, no one can cover him. Denver is still the best place for him. Every now and then I don’t think he realizes that.

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Jan 11, 2010 12:30 PM MST up reply actions  

A guy declaring himself out of the biggest game of the year mid-week...

…and then missing a seemingly important session with the trainers is so ridiculously insidious when it comes to perception, isn’t it? I mean, gosh, give a guy a break already…just because he’s hanging on a thin string with the league office, that he stayed away from his team all off-season while repeatedly asking to be traded, that he got suspended by the team in training camp, that his replacement hung a meager 14 – 213 – 15.2 in his absence, and because he refuses to suggest he’d like to be a Bronco, folks still go get all unreasonable about him. Geesh.

You’re right, though. If it was just about BM’s talent and promise, this would be a silly debate. But it looks a lot more complicated to me.

So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson

by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 11, 2010 12:37 PM MST up reply actions  

I Have To Agree

Note I said, when Marshall’s right. Marshall is NOT right when he’s calling out McDaniels for never playing the game, disbelieving the team’s doctors, getting himself suspended. When I look at things objectively, Marshall’s cons definitely outweigh the pros. Jabar Gaffney is the man and appears to be bereft of ego. If Marshall insists on remaining a petulant brat, no I don’t want him back. He’s a fool if he doesn’t want to play for Mr. Bowlen, clearly the best owner in sports.

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Jan 11, 2010 12:49 PM MST up reply actions  

All of this makes sense

Except there’s only one question that now matters: Can Brandon be trusted to help the teams production and morale both on the field and in the locker room for the long term? If the answer is no, well then it no longer matters what has happened in the past, only to achieve maximum value.
It’s all over but the crying.

by Alex on Jan 11, 2010 12:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Heres a question?

If the Rams offered there second round pick and a third this year for Marshall would anyone take that deal?

Moreno 09 and beyond!!!

by BroncoKO on Jan 11, 2010 12:29 PM MST reply actions  

All of these questions about picks and trades are spinning around in my head........

How about we trade Marshall for a 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and a 1st rounder in the 2036 draft? Seems fair to me. We can use that 2036 pick to draft the awesome cyborg quarterback out of the University of Galactica. I hear his bionic arm is stronger than Jay Cutler’s.

On a serious note, how about we just take a 1st and 3rd like his tender would require and call it a day?

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Why has nobody made a live-action game of Chutes and Ladders? I'd be first in line.

by Troy Hufford on Jan 11, 2010 12:57 PM MST up reply actions  

Sorry, but Cutler's Grandson said, when asked if he had a stronger arm than a cyborg...

“Yes, I have a stronger arm than a cyborg; as well as John Elway’s cryogenically frozen right arm.” Then he went out and threw 2 Red Zone picks!

by RalphW on Jan 11, 2010 1:21 PM MST up reply actions  

lol, nice.

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Why has nobody made a live-action game of Chutes and Ladders? I'd be first in line.

by Troy Hufford on Jan 11, 2010 2:07 PM MST up reply actions  

I'd take 2 2nd's and a 3rd...

You might even convince me of a 2nd, a 3rd and a young mid level guy that works hard and wants to play…

by RalphW on Jan 11, 2010 12:31 PM MST reply actions  

The CBA messes with this question

First, the idea of signing Marshall to a long-term contract strikes me as wishful thinking. As much as I admire his playing ability, his actions seem to indicate he wants out of Denver and I cannot see the Broncos forcing him to stay. So my thought on this question becomes how to maximize Marshall’s value. I see two scenarios:

With a new CBA: Franchise then trade.
Without a CBA: Tender then let him shop himself.

My ‘No’ vote is predicated upon the latter scenario, since it doesn’t look like likely there will be a CBA. Without a CBA, Marshall is worth a first and a third as a starting point. It seems silly to trade him for simply a first when you can get more for him by letting him sign elsewhere. The only reason I see for the Broncos to accept less for him is if they are feeling vindictive and want to exile him somewhere ugly such as with the Browns or with Seattle.

by DCJ on Jan 11, 2010 12:46 PM MST reply actions  

I say NO.

Make him play here another year, or he can sit. (he won’t because his ego won’t let him do that).

Then, if he decides, hey, I like being a Bronco then he stays, if not, well then you try to get the picks you need when theres a rookie cap. ;)

Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.

by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Jan 11, 2010 12:58 PM MST reply actions  

but "if not" what's the reaction from the 52 others

Those who work their butts of and put everything they have into every game, all towards working to win a SB. I just think Marshall’s issues the last two weeks of the season were a slap to the face of Dawkins and Bailey who aren’t about that stuff.

I’d rather not “make him” play and find out what worse can come of that. I’d love if he wanted to be part of greatness and do everything it takes to succeed as a team, but sadly, I"m beyond thinking that would be a reality whether he gets his payday or not.

I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)

by BroncoInExile on Jan 11, 2010 1:02 PM MST up reply actions  

part of me thinks that if it's bad enough for those to true stars to speak up...

then it must have been really bad.

The other part of me thinks that if those two were to be slapped in the face for their defensive efforts instead of simply pronounced HOFers and not held accountable at all… then maybe we’d see some heart shown by our defense…

by Whidbey Bronco on Jan 11, 2010 6:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Agree with BIE here.

Although, you raise an interesting point about the rookie cap. I wish this situation were able to make it long enough for the rookie cap, but I’m not so sure that’s possible. We could just do like the patriots and keep trading for future picks. Psychic Bill is probably forseeing a rookie cap coming along in a few years and he’s stockpiling picks for that day.

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Why has nobody made a live-action game of Chutes and Ladders? I'd be first in line.

by Troy Hufford on Jan 11, 2010 1:07 PM MST up reply actions  

I really should have though harder about my name acronym

it’s really close to BILE. :)

I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)

by BroncoInExile on Jan 11, 2010 4:44 PM MST up reply actions  

NO

You get at LEAST a 1st and a 3rd for him if not more. This is almost exactly the same position we were in with Cutler and I said the same thing…“you only trade the guy for what his value is”.

I don’t care how much of a punk he is…he can ride the pine if he doesn’t want to play ball.

I also have great faith that we will get him traded…I really don’t see him not getting attention from at least 4 teams out there.

"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV

by sadaraine on Jan 11, 2010 1:13 PM MST reply actions  

No

Not enough- we’ll get at least a 1st and a 3rd because he’ll be a RFA when there’s no CBA for at least 2010. It’d be dumb to give him up for one pick.

by AllBroncsallday on Jan 11, 2010 2:50 PM MST reply actions  

Absolutely

I don’t see the Broncos getting more for him this year, even if he’s the best possession receiver to ever step on the field. Gaffney is definitely a step down from Marshall, but he’ll do fine for what they both are used to do.

You guys that see Marshall as HOF are deluded….. you’ve got your own kinda Koolaid you’re funneling.

Now where did that Kool-Aid vendor go?

by pubkeeper on Jan 11, 2010 3:09 PM MST reply actions  

There was a time this season,

when it looked like Brandon Marshall had gotten over the hump and really played to make a difference for the Broncos. We all have to admit he has tremendous talent and ability when he applies himself. He just doesn’t at times. Imagine if he’d given his all 100% of the time what his production would have looked like.
Bottom line unless we get more than a first round pick for him I’d say keep him. Really all Denver has to do this year is match any potential offers and he stays a Bronco. What’s the compensation if we don’t match, a third rounder? Franchise him and well he probably throws a fit….not sure that’s worth the tag.
I’d like us to keep him and if we do pay him the money he’s earned, but, that also means there has to be some mending to do as well. Dog gone premadonna WR’s anyway :o), whatcha’ goina do.

"A great pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do" Walter Gagenot
"Hope sees the invisible, feels the intangible and achieves the impossible."

by bchiper on Jan 11, 2010 3:31 PM MST reply actions  

Brandon for a first and at least a fourth.

If no one offers the following, then no dice. The problem McD and X run into is the same thing someone mentioned here at one point. Brandon is nothing more than a possession receiver to most teams. He isn’t a deep threat necessarily. His two really deep balls against Washington came in wide open coverage—the kind of coverage that would allow any of us to make the touchdown if we were on the receiving end of it.

I won’t discredit Brandon completely, because in 08 and 07 he was a legitimate deep threat at times, but it’s not about what you’ve done for me. It’s about what you’ve done for me lately. In my opinion, if McX can somehow manage to pull a 1st and 4th/3rd for a possession receiver, then they will have made out like bandits.

Would anyone here give a first and third/fourth for Wes Welker? Hardly. He is a good receiver, solid as they come, but his position as a slot receiver says you shouldn’t give more than a second for him. Period.

John Clayton is the head Dean at Fail University (known as F.U. in short)

Formerly known as Calijoefornia

by Joe Medina on Jan 11, 2010 5:22 PM MST reply actions  

He wasn't a deep threat last season.......

……because Kyle Orton doesn’t have the arm to get him the ball deep.

by BroncoFan_17 on Jan 11, 2010 5:33 PM MST up reply actions  

enough of that argument already.

Orton can make any throw the O line allows him to make. Period.

John Clayton is the head Dean at Fail University (known as F.U. in short)

Formerly known as Calijoefornia

by Joe Medina on Jan 11, 2010 5:45 PM MST up reply actions  

-1

-Richee
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!

by BroncoSense72 on Jan 12, 2010 8:06 AM MST up reply actions  

100+ catches, per season, the last three seasons.

Hell no I don’t trade him. You know, an older, more mature coach knows how to handle these divas and their egos. It sucks having to baby grown men, but sometimes you have to……..and good coaches know how to do that. You need star players in skill positions to win. That’s a fact.

Josh is a young, head strong guy. His “my way or the highway” attitude isn’t doing this organization any good. He’s trying to be Belichick, without having earned the respect of Belichick.

We’ve gone from Jay Cutler & Brandon Marshall to Kyle Orton & Jabar Gaffney. Come on man.

by BroncoFan_17 on Jan 11, 2010 5:31 PM MST reply actions   1 recs

Agreed

I’ve mentioned on a previous post that McD is getting into a pissing contests with his players and airing in on the networks…not real mature and seems to have an overcompensation approach that I attribute to him being self conscious about his age.

"Pain don't hurt" - Swayze (Road House) -- We miss you man!

by bonaire on Jan 11, 2010 6:08 PM MST up reply actions  

couldn't have said it better

But it sounds like all debates on this are over. Glad we don’t make these decisions because we would have traded everyone on this team so far. Just go back and read the posts after every game this year after the bye week.
Every good player on our team has been thrown to the wolves in at least one of those games and even tho we lost to the colts, the beast was our savior. go figure, each week depending on who we thought was a screw up was tossed to the lions… Very Very glad we are not making the final rosters here….. we would have nobody left…… As soon as Gaffney has a 100 catch season and not just a good game or two I will agree that he is the man but until then…. but he is a player that seems like he could be a keeper. Would be nice to win a few games before we think we are better than we really are, in the mean time lets not be in such a rush to toss our better players.
If we want nothing but good guys then I only hope they can win a game or two….but it really doesn’t matter what we think, it is Josh’s team so we live with whatever he decides…. Who do we throw to the lions after the Beast?

by pwsbronco on Jan 11, 2010 8:50 PM MST up reply actions  

Well said

I would like to see these situations carried out in private. McDaniels is a first year HC, so I am sure he will evaluate how he handled situations throughout the season and change things for the better.

2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant

by weazel on Jan 11, 2010 9:20 PM MST up reply actions  

He's learned from Belichick, so of course he is going to have a similar, if not identical, coaching philosophy to him.

Personally, I hate this idea that because he is only a rookie HC he is not allowed to coach the way he has been taught. And why is it “my way or the highway” as opposed to “our [the team’s] way or the highway”?

by Timimus on Jan 11, 2010 9:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Well, everyone seemed to be on board early.......

I was amazed at how he had the team playing. With all the changes to the coaching staff and player personnel, plus completely different schemes, and a brutal schedule, I could have actually seen this team winning 4 games all year.

But something went wrong mid way through the season. It seemed like his players got tired of playing for him. I’m just sayin’.

Trust me. I hope and pray that McDaniels succeeds. But sometimes "our"way or the highway just leaves you with a group of hard working, mediocre players and staff who all get along…….and finish 8-8 every season.

You don’t trade away a youjng, Pro Bowl quarterback, with franchise potential, and then turn around and trade a 100+ catch per season, Pro Bowl receiver…. even if they are a bit moody. You bring in a coach that assures you that he’ll keep the league’s number 2 offense firing on all cylinders, and will fix your crappy defense.

We used to have a high powered offense and a crappy defense. Now we have a mediocre offense and a crappy defense.

by BroncoFan_17 on Jan 12, 2010 8:18 PM MST up reply actions  

Only to move up & draft Claussen

I would only pull the trigger on a trade if you are moving up to draft Claussen. And it would have to be a guarentee that you would get him so u can’t do a trade till draft day.

Other than that..no I would not trade him.

I would trade the 10th pick down to get Tebow hopefully around 20 if the above was impossible.

by CastorTroy on Jan 11, 2010 5:47 PM MST via mobile reply actions  

No thanks on Clausen

Highly overrated and a not very good. I would take Tebow over Clausen lol. If we trade up it better be for a much better player then Clausen

by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 11, 2010 6:13 PM MST up reply actions  

If the Broncos trade Marshall and all they get is a 2010 1st round pick then I think that may officially qualify as the worst trade in NFL history.

"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!

by PosterNutbag on Jan 11, 2010 8:22 PM MST reply actions  

+100

"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV

by sadaraine on Jan 12, 2010 9:51 AM MST up reply actions  

I voted no

because he is worth more than a first rounder. This is a really tough decision and I am glad it isn’t up to me. While I want Marshall to stay and everything is fine and dandy, I know that it may go the other way. If that is the case then that first rounder better be high or have another pick along with it.

The offseason is long so hopefully thigs will die down over time and the players than WANT to play for the Broncos will show up on time.

2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant

by weazel on Jan 11, 2010 9:13 PM MST reply actions  

Which do you prefer?

All-Pro production and some off-field headaches, or the gamble of a 1st-round pick?

If Denver were in the bottom third of the league, I’d say trade him and plug some holes. If we were in the top third of the league, I’d say absolutely don’t trade him because his talent would help sustain the fabric of a playoff team. We sit in the middle, which is why it’s a tough choice. I vote “no” because to me, his on-field production outweighs his off the field shenanigans.

by Hobnail_Boot on Jan 12, 2010 1:17 AM MST reply actions  

until those off field shenanigans wind up costing Denver a few million...

when BMarsh has to sit out a whole season for being an idiot (which he’s been good at), Denver will still have to pay him the same money.

I’d much rather pay someone that has half the talent and puts forth 100% effort than pay someone that has all the talent but can’t touch a field competitively for 12 months.

John Clayton is the head Dean at Fail University (known as F.U. in short)

Formerly known as Calijoefornia

by Joe Medina on Jan 12, 2010 1:47 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Cribbs and a FIRST rounder

is what I’d want for Marshall. But I wonder if the Browns, if they can’t pay Cribbs, would be willing to pay Marshall what he’s got coming…

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jan 18, 2010 1:05 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgres_small
Are You Nuts? No Plan B?
Oc_small
I NEED YOUR HELP MHR: The Down Under Bowl

Recent FanPosts

Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick Really Worth? Pt. 2.
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
Glad for Gronkowski
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick REALLY Worth?
Index_small
Nate Irving!
Fhgfhgfhg_small
Rod Smith is a Hall of Famer....Right?
205783_109706759113985_100002239833864_101133_7230028_n_small
My Final 53
00000021_small
J-Man 2012 NFL preview First of 3 Editions
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Payette_011_small
3 X 80 = ???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Broncos-von-miller_small Scotty Payne

Ph_small BroncoPH

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall