Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

2009 Denver Broncos Season Review: Running Back



For as long as any Bronco fan my age can remember, the running game has been a staple of this team.  Denver has churned out thousand yard backs like clockwork, and fans have gotten used to an offense that establishes the run to set up the passing game offensively.

A lot of the Broncos' success at the running back position was thanks to Mike Shanahan's zone blocking scheme, where it seemed the Broncos could sign Burt Snurd off the street and make him into a premiere back in the NFL.

Despite the Broncos' success in recent years, their last 1,000 yard back was Tatum Bell in 2006, and ever since then, their running game has really struggled.

Star-divide

Travis Henry was signed in 2007 to a lucritive deal with the hopes that he would give the Broncos the featured back they had not had since Clinton Portis in 2003.  In short, Henry was arguably the biggest free agent bust the Broncos have ever brought in. 

His injury riddled career in Denver was mixed with drug issues and lack of pure production on the field, and that opened the door for Selvin Young, who a lot of Broncos fans thought could be a great back provided he could stay healthy.

Denver entered the 2008 season with Young as the featured back, and he couldn't stay healthy, but he wasn't the only one. 

In what might be considered the single most impressive revolving door at one position in the NFL due to injury, the Broncos stumbled to the 12th best rushing attack in the league.  The leader of that attack was fan favorite and rookie seventh round pick Peyton Hillis.

Broncos fans entered the 2009 offseason knowing full well that Peyton Hillis was capable of carrying the full load, and that McDaniels might come in and bring on a veteran and maybe a later round rookie to compete with Hillis and add some much needed depth.

McDaniels came in and made running back a top priority in the offseason, signing Correll Buckhalter (Philadelphia) and J.J. Arrington (Arizona) almost immediately after free agency began.  Arrington's deal never amounted to anything because of a surgery that would require him to miss the entire 2009 season.

He later added LaMont Jordan as a free agent who he knew from his days with the Patriots.  The Broncos had put together a solid, but not great core of backs, and when the draft came around, McDaniels and the Broncos' new staff decided to throw everyone a curveball.

Instead of going with defense (namely Brian Orakpo) with the 12th overall pick, they decided to take the top running back available in Knowshon Moreno.

Moreno was thought to be the perfect fit for McDaniels' system.  Though he is still very young (came out of college as RS Sophomore) he has excellent leadership skills, great hands out of the backfield, he is an exceptional blocker for the position, and he is the type of power back that this offense requires.

The rookie was late to training camp, which hurt him both in terms of learning the offense and getting acquainted with full contact football in the NFL.  Not coincidentally, he was injured early on in the preseason and was barely healthy enough to play in the Cincinnati game.

With Moreno as the featured back, Denver's running game is promising for the future, but he needs some help.

Though he led the NFL among rookies in rushing in 2009, his yard per carry average was under four.  A lot of that had to do with the Broncos' interior blocking and transition to their new offensive scheme, but Moreno was expected to be productive in this offense, and he certainly was.

Along with veteran Correll Buckhalter, the Broncos at times had one of the league's most feared rushing attacks.  When the running game was hot, the offense was blazing.  Inversely, when the running game was anemic, so too was the rest of the offense. 

It is no secret that Josh McDaniels' offense requires a sound running game to be effective, and that couldn't have been laid out any more black and white in the Broncos' 2009 campaign.  Here is a graphic of the Broncos' rushing attack week by week, and a correlation between yards, points scored, and the result of the contest.

Game Yards Rushing Points Scored Game Result
@ CIN 75 12 W
vs. CLE 186 27 W
@ OAK 215 23 W
vs. DAL 116 17 W
vs. NE 103 20 W
@SD 101 34 W
@BAL 66 7 L
vs. PIT 27 10 L
@WAS 120 17 L
vs. SD 115 3 L
vs. NYG 138 26 W
@KC 245 44 W
@IND 95 16 L
vs. OAK 80 19 L
@PHI 70 27 L
vs. KC 84 24 L


This graphic paints a very interesting picture, and one that I think speaks volumes to this season.  The Broncos only ran for 100 yards or more in 9 of their 16 contests.  Of those nine games, the Broncos won seven.

Going by this statistic, if the Broncos ran for 100 or more yards in every game, they would have won 13 games this season.  Obviously there are other factors that play into games, but clearly when the Broncos run the ball effectively, they are able to control the clock and their offense prospers.

In games when Broncos ran for 100 yards or more, they averaged  over 23 points per game, and if you discount the San Diego game at home (no clue how they ran for 100 in that one) they averaged 26 points per game in those where they rushed for 100 yards or more as a team.

As I stated earlier, the Broncos needed the running game to be effective offensively.  Kyle Orton was successful as a Chicago Bear because he had a sound defense and a good running game to go along with his mistake-free approach to the game.  When the Broncos had a similar formula (see six game winning streak to start season) Orton was at his very best.  He even snuck into the MVP discussion for a while.

The Broncos' offense must provide Orton with a sound running game, because this offense cannot be effective in so many 1st, 2nd, and 3rd and long situations.  I know the amount of screen passes and slants we saw this season were almost sickening, but those can be extremely effective if your running game is on. 

In fact, that is probably what McDaniels envisioned all along.  An elite running game to go along with an effective short passing game would give the Broncos a huge edge and a winning formula on offense.  Combine that with a top ten defense, and you've got yourself a Super Bowl contender.

Unfortunately, the Broncos' running game was too inconsistent.  Running for over 100 yards (barely, in some cases) in only nine games is completely unacceptable for an NFL team with playoff aspirations.

How can the Broncos fix this issue moving forward?

  1. Establish the interior line for the future
  2. Add another power back
  3. Add a speed back

The Broncos' 2010 draft is going to be critical to the immediate future of this team.  I know there are many on this site who believe Idaho guard Mike Iupati is going to be a hot prospect for this team during the draft, and I would agree.  For those not in the know of Iupati, he is a 6'6" 330 pound beast from Idaho who will likely go somewhere in the late first or early second round. 

Adding Iupati for the Broncos is all but essential, but there is another prospect the Broncos need to focus on earlier in the draft process.  Florida center Maurkice Pouncey recently declared himself eligible for April's draft, and he will undoubtedly enter the process as the consensus top center prospect available.  At 6'5" 320 pounds, he is exactly what the Broncos should be looking for on the interior of their offensive line.

If the Broncos could find a way to add both of these players, they would have arguably the best young offensive line in the NFL, and one of the biggest, which is something this offense yearns for.

Adding a power back will be simple for Denver.  The Broncos could look to a power back in any of rounds two through seven, and here are some of the top available prospects to add some pop to Denver's rushing attack:

  1. Jonathan Dwyer, Georgia Tech, 5'11'' 235
  2. Ryan Matthews, Fresno State, 5'11" 225
  3. Toby Gerhart, Stanford, 6'1" 240
  4. Anthony Dixon, Mississippi State, 6'0" 240
  5. Ben Tate, Auburn, 5'11" 215
  6. Charles Scott, LSU, 5'11" 231
  7. Keiland Williams, LSU, 5'11" 226
  8. LeGarrette Blount, Oregon, 6'1" 250

Of the players on that list, I am most intrigued by Ben Tate of Auburn and LeGarrette Blount of Oregon.  I am encouraged by Tate because of his willingness and ability to adapt to new offensive schemes in his time at Auburn.  He is a durable player, and he will play through any nagging injuries.  Very tough.  He has good instincts as a runner, and is very competitive.

Blount is an intriguing prospect based on his size and speed combination alone.  He is one of the best in the college game at finishing runs, and I think he would be absolutely worth a late-round flyer despite his character concerns. 

As for a speed back, I think the best option might be to bring back J.J. Arrington for a short-term deal.  I know the coaching staff really liked him last offseason, and if he has fully healed and has been maintaining shape, he would be a nice addition to this team as well as a great special teams player and receiver out of the backfield.

If we look to a speed back in the draft, Ole Miss' Dexter McCluster seems like a great fit for this team.  He is a very coachable player with elite top-end speed, and he is as versatile as any player in this draft.  He will take a slide during the draft because he is only 5'7", but we all know as Broncos fans not to count a runner out because of his size, having been burned plenty of times by Darren Sproles.

I also recently became intrigued by the possibility of drafting a guy like Jahvid Best or C.J. Spiller in the first round if we obtain an extra pick in exchange for Brandon Marshall.  It seems like a long shot, but we should never count it out as a possibility.

Overall the Broncos' running game was far too inconsistent to receive an above average grade from me.  Only nine games of 100 or more yards as a unit, and a group that only ranked 18th in the league in rushing, I give them a final grade of C+.

This is a unit that has a lot of promise in Knowshon Moreno going forward.  If he and Buckhalter can stay healthy, and the Broncos can add a couple of fresh sets of legs in the offseason, this unit could be the key that ignites a Denver playoff run in 2010.

Poll
What Grade Would You Give the Broncos' Running Backs?
A
15 votes
B
276 votes
C
448 votes
D
96 votes
F
12 votes

847 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 49 comments  |  9 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I gave them a C and it isn't intirely their fault.

Maybe if they had a O-Line to run behind they would have been better

by bfree2bronc on Jan 11, 2010 9:50 PM MST reply actions  

I absolutely agree

I gave them a C as well, and I firmly believe I will be voting A at this time next year. McDaniels knows the importance of this area of the game, and the problems will be rectified.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 11, 2010 9:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Agreed!

-Richee
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!

by BroncoSense72 on Jan 12, 2010 7:22 AM MST up reply actions  

C+/B-

from me and agree that the interior of the line was part of the problem. Also Knowshon was a rookie and at times looked like it, and at other times looked like a future All-Pro, which is what I thnk he eventually will be. I like Buckhalter a lot but he can’t get through a whole year healthy. I agree they need to draft another power back and/or fullback.

I am a huge Toby Gerhart fan though maybe I’m in the minority around here and at any rate I don’t think the Broncos will end up with him. The character concerns for Blount are a concern for me, too, and I’d be surprised if McDaniels comes anywhere near him. But Tate would be a great add.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jan 11, 2010 10:00 PM MST reply actions  

I don't totally disagree

I am all for taking blount in the later rounds, and would be happy to Denver get Pouncey in the second and or Lupita for sure late first or early second if we get a first round/second round pick for Marshall, however I wouldn’t waste a high round pick on a running back or receiver, I still believe this draft has some very good top end defensive players, and they tend to be diffuclt to find in the mid to later rounds, so I say stick with defense up top and fill in offensive needs in the middle and bottom rounds.

by broncos314 on Jan 11, 2010 10:06 PM MST reply actions  

Good points

And you could very well be right. swg777 brought up a similar point and I tend to agree with him. I would not mind if we could end up with those two OL in the second round, and take two defensive studs in the first, depending on who we take. Were you thinking along the lines of Dan Williams?

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 8:14 AM MST up reply actions  

Minor Correction

It was Alex Gibbs that Broncos fans can thank for the successful ZB scheme. The word on the street is, that Shanny’s interested in Gibbs joining the Redskins in a consultant-type role and I am already declaring them “Denver East.”

Note: Houston is Denver South.

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Jan 11, 2010 10:31 PM MST reply actions  

Haha

Now we just need a Denver North.

I was unaware that Gibbs made it successful. I was always under the impression it was Shanahan, so thanks for the info.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 8:15 AM MST up reply actions  

We need a Denver West

Since we are now New England West. lol

by WABroncoFan on Jan 12, 2010 9:45 AM MST up reply actions  

I would tend to agree with your C+ assesment of the Broncos run game as 'a unit'

Yet, I would give a b+ to your question of grading the backs themselves. In any event, I would absolutely l-o-v-e to see two interior offensive linemen drafted somewhere in the first two rounds.

by Alex on Jan 11, 2010 10:33 PM MST reply actions  

Thanks

I agree. The run game as a unit was sub-par, but the backs were intriguing. Knowshon’s average per carry wasn’t impressive, nor was Correll Buckhalter’s inability to stay healthy.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 8:16 AM MST up reply actions  

Pouncey + Lupita

That would be a first 2 rounds that would make me really happy, wow. I haven’t got into mock draft mode, so I haven’t spent any time thinking about it, but yeah, I like that :)

by studbucket on Jan 11, 2010 10:49 PM MST reply actions  

Lupita? ;-)

You want the Broncos to draft the Mexican restaurant down the street from me? ;-)

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jan 12, 2010 9:18 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Just teasing of course

I don’t think anyone can spell his name right twice in a row. I have to write it on the chalkboard repeatedly t get it right myself.

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.

by underdog on Jan 12, 2010 9:19 AM MST up reply actions  

LOL

Thank you, I would have even started pronouncing his name wrong too.

Tweeting via @jtkimbell

by studbucket on Jan 13, 2010 1:26 PM MST up reply actions  

I go with C but wouldn't draft a power back

We have Hillis. I know many on this board have given up on him because McD seems to have given up on him. However, he had a great year 2 years ago and a barely heard from year this year. If we are all willing to give Orton and others a year to learn the system, then why not extend the same for Hillis and give him one more year and a true shot. Buck and Moreno are the same type of backs. I much prefer when the 2 main backs bring something different to the game to keep the D off guard. We either need to make that Hillis or draft a speed back and feature him with Moreno.

"Pain don't hurt" - Swayze (Road House) -- We miss you man!

by bonaire on Jan 11, 2010 11:38 PM MST reply actions  

isn't hillis

more a halfback sort?

His skills seem to be most well suited for catching short throws in open field, and then running people over.

He’s not a power back – he can’t fight through two or three tacklers in closed space; goes down too early. He’s not effective when he can’t build up a head of steam first.

That’s also why he’s not great as a tight end.

But if you get him the ball in open field while he’s on the run, or can build up some speed after catching the ball, that’s his best fit.

The problem is those plays take time to develop, and Orton never had the time.

Hopefully with an improved offensive line, we’ll see more of Hillis.

by tunesmith on Jan 12, 2010 12:02 AM MST up reply actions  

I do think Hillis is more halfback than fullback

However, I do remember some amazing runs 2 years ago where he broke multiple tackles on short yardage situations. If we can’t judge Moreno because of the lousy line play this year than we really can’t judge Hillis either. I do agree he is very good catching out of the back field. It also seemed like the few chances he did have this year, he seemed a bit slow to get to the line of scrimmage, not sure if that was just a mirage. But I still want to give him another shot when we have so many other areas in need of drafting.

"Pain don't hurt" - Swayze (Road House) -- We miss you man!

by bonaire on Jan 12, 2010 12:08 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I agree, we SHOULD give him another shot

I just doubt it. I don’t know, it seemed like we would be using him in a much more prominent role this year, but that never amounted to anything. I hope he comes back certainly, but right now I don’t see it.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 8:17 AM MST up reply actions  

About McD's system requiring a sound running game to be effective....

I’ve read this a few times recently on our board. I don’t know the answer but I seem to recall the Pats in the last few years being a pass first offense. I am guessing that every coach would say they need a sound running game…but certainly some lead with the run. It seems McD has traditionally been a pass heavy OC. I’m not trying to start controversy, I would just like some clarification to this point from those more informed than myself.

"Pain don't hurt" - Swayze (Road House) -- We miss you man!

by bonaire on Jan 11, 2010 11:59 PM MST reply actions  

With Brady at his peak (and with the playbook down pat) throwing to Moss, Welker, Gaffney, Watson, etc.

Until the superbowl, noone could stop them passing the ball, so they didn’t need to run (at least in 2007). I think before that it was a more balanced offence (but I could be wrong).

by Timimus on Jan 12, 2010 12:30 AM MST up reply actions  

McDs system

McD likes a version of what today is called the Erhardt/ Perkins system. Weis installed this system when he came to New England, and McD has put his own spin on it. The Chiefs and the Panthers are two other teams that run a similar offensive system.

The offensive system was a run first, hit you in the mouth scheme primarily. It changed though around the time when the NFL rules made it easier for teams to pass. Erhardt who was the predecessor to Parcels, schooled not only Parcells but also Weis in NY in the early 90s. Parcells stuck will the original scheme when he became the head coach of the Giants, but when he went to NE he brought Weis with him. Weis went on to become the offensive coordinator that would school McD.

Weis like McD favors one back formations, so typically he prefers; one back, one TE, and 3WRs. This set is ideal for running between the tackles and slant routes.

by AirNorval on Jan 12, 2010 1:40 AM MST up reply actions  

With KO at the helm

We absolutely need a top tier running game to be effective. It’d be different if you had a superstud quarterback who could win a game with his arm alone, but we don’t. We have a QB who can chip away at a defense on shorter routes.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 8:18 AM MST up reply actions  

I gave the running backs a B

I know it is too much to ask in the NFL, but I just want one season where our running backs stay healthy. Our running game deteriorated when Buck got injured and I think he was a good option to give Kno Mo a breather. I am intrigued about getting 2 big offensive linemen in the early rounds of the draft, but agree that this is one of the teams biggest needs

by CockneyBronco on Jan 12, 2010 1:41 AM MST reply actions  

You touched upon my impressions . . .

I gave them a B, too. It’s not their fault they can’t run through brick walls . . .

BILLY THOMPSON GOT SHAFTED!!

by AZDynamics on Jan 12, 2010 7:08 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree

If we could just stay healthy (which, admirably Knowshon did) then we should be in great position for this year, especially if we bring in a back to learn the system. Watch for Auburn RB Ben Tate. I like that guy, and he seems to have the smarts to make the switch to our scheme.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 8:19 AM MST up reply actions  

A bit harsh, yes but

I held our O-line to a higher standard. I think that’s why I would grade them so low. Being that the until was 100% intact from last year. Granted Harris’ injury was BIG, but I can’t hold that unit to the same standard as the re-tooled D-line, or LB’s, or QB, or RB, or secondary that was all a mix of new and old.

Gaining 80 yards in a home loss to Oakland when we had rushed for 215 previously…that’s on the O-line as much as it is the RB’s IMO.

ps, keep up the good work. I am enjoying your breakdowns very much!

by RalphW on Jan 12, 2010 2:02 PM MST up reply actions  

Good job, Sayre, as usual . . .

Just one thing: Orton really didn’t have a “good” running game in Chicago. It ranked #27 in the league at 3.9 yards a pop. And the defense was sound only against the run. They were #30 in the league against the pass.

That’s one reason I liked Orton so much, coming into this season. After all the research I did on him, I came away impressed with the job he did against the challenges he faced. And, of course, he had to have that quality again this year.

Anyway, this is about the RBs. The way Moreno sometimes danced in the backfield frustrated me a little, but I think part of it might be because he saw no hole, or even a crease. If the O-line can provide one, I think he’ll take it.

Regarding Buck, he was a blessing this year. What can I say?

BILLY THOMPSON GOT SHAFTED!!

by AZDynamics on Jan 12, 2010 7:17 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

Thanks

I guess what I was meaning was the days when he had Forte, and then Jones and Benson. The Bears used to be able to rely on the run to get them close, then Orton’s short range passing was more effective.

I know his defense was horrid in his last year with Chicago, so I commend him for the job he did there.

I got angry sometimes with Knowshon’s dancing, but I stopped after that play against the Giants where he spun around and got a first down. That was sick.

Buckhalter was awesome when healthy. Unfortunately, that wasn’t all the time.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 8:22 AM MST up reply actions  

Drafting a RB..

I still believe it was foolish to draft a RB in the first round last year. Regardless of the OL troubles this season the drop off between a 1st round RB and a 3rd rounder arent that noticeable.

by johnnystarr on Jan 12, 2010 7:36 AM MST reply actions  

Not so much true for this year's class

Knowshon is head and shoulders above anyone in this class, even in the first round.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 8:22 AM MST up reply actions  

Really?

I don’t even know if Knoswhon is better then Bennie Wells let alone head and shoulders.

by johnnystarr on Jan 12, 2010 10:20 AM MST up reply actions  

Too early to say that.

Especially if you’ve watched Donald Brown or Shonn Greene play.

- Nick

"We got 'em right where we want 'em!" - Keith Bishop, right before John Elway orchestrated The Drive. 'Nuff said.

by ncm42 on Jan 12, 2010 10:23 AM MST up reply actions  

Not so much Donald Brown

Shonn Greene, you hit a soft spot on me. I love Shonn Greene. Still, neither of their production even came close to Moreno this year.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 11:35 AM MST up reply actions  

I was hoping we would land Greene.

But no matter their production, I just don’t think you can say Moreno is clearly ‘head and shoulders’ above those two, particularly Greene.

- Nick

"We got 'em right where we want 'em!" - Keith Bishop, right before John Elway orchestrated The Drive. 'Nuff said.

by ncm42 on Jan 12, 2010 1:56 PM MST up reply actions  

AND

let me add, since I neglected to before, EXCELLENT post! Thanks for the work you put into it…

- Nick

"We got 'em right where we want 'em!" - Keith Bishop, right before John Elway orchestrated The Drive. 'Nuff said.

by ncm42 on Jan 12, 2010 1:57 PM MST up reply actions  

I don’t think anyone ever feared our running game and I don’t think Moreno was ever an exceptional blocker. Good read but I think you paint too pretty of a picture for the position.

Also when did Peyton prove he was capable of carrying a full load?
He has had two games where he carried a full load and then got injured [yes, I realize the injury was due to the qb]. I don’t think that is nearly enough for anyone to think someone can carry a full load.

by Todd Jewell on Jan 12, 2010 8:03 AM MST reply actions  

Thanks for the comment

I disagree though. Our running game was ranked in the top five heading into the bye week. I think those first six teams “feared” our running game, for whatever that is worth. We ran the ball up and down on teams in the first six weeks.

Peyton proved to me he could carry a full load last season. His injury was that of the “freakish” nature, and had nothing to do with his durability. I think he proved in that final stretch of games last year that he could be a featured back. Maybe I was wrong, but we’ll never know.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 8:24 AM MST up reply actions  

I just have one quibble...

You wrote, “the amount of screen passes and slants we saw this season were almost sickening.”

Take away the “almost,” and I give you an A.

"People who work together will win, whether it be against complex football defenses, or the problems of modern society." - Vince Lombardi

by broncospriestess on Jan 12, 2010 8:04 AM MST reply actions  

I'd go with a B-/C+

and see a lot of potential going forward. We have a set of very talented backs. I’m not sold on Jordan long term as I think his best days are behind him. We need to fix the offense line issues in order to consistently open gaps for the backs to go through. Quite frankly if you can’t block, scheme doesn’t matter here, you can’t run. Moreno needs to trust the line and hit the gaps he is given, and in the NFL those aren’t very large.

I don’t see McDaniels going for a back in the first three rounds and I don’t see him reaching for a guard or center either. Adding a quality back would be helpful though.
Blount is intriguing because he is built in a similar fashion to Brandon Jacobs of the Giants and is a load to bring down. But, in the Rose Bowl he really didn’t show much against an effective Ohio State defense and that concerns me.

"A great pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do" Walter Gagenot
"Hope sees the invisible, feels the intangible and achieves the impossible."

by bchiper on Jan 12, 2010 8:30 AM MST reply actions  

I'll go so far as to say B+

Though the running game unit is a C at best. Moreno in particular took a while to learn how to push the holes better, but he was often hit before the LOS, and he fought really hard for his 3 yards. I’ll give the RBs a good grade, but the Run blocking was average at best.

by SkinnyPB on Jan 12, 2010 10:16 AM MST reply actions  

Correlation and causation

Say it with me: correlation is not causation.

Obviously there are other factors that play into games, but clearly when the Broncos run the ball effectively, they are able to control the clock and their offense prospers.


I think it is the other way around:

…. clearly when the Broncos offense prospoers they are able to run the ball effectively and control the clock.

This is a stat that gets pulled out numerous times every year: team so and so is undefeted when they run the ball more than 25 times or something to that effect. The reason is quite simple, you run when you are winning, you don’t win when you are running. If it was as easy as running the ball for a number of yards or touhes per game and you would be sure to win, every team would do it.

The reason we run so well in games we win is because we are winning, when you outplay the opposition with your defense and passing game it opens up opportunities for the run. When you are behind because you are being outplayed by the other teams defense and your offense is stalling you are not going to be able to run the ball.

Running doesn’t lead to winning, winning leads to running. That is why there is such a beautiful correlation.

I gave the runningbacks a D, Jordan and Moreno both disappointed and Buckhalter was too much hit and miss. Over all I believe the runningbacks are as much to blame for the poor output as the offensive line (who will also be recieving a D when it is their turn).

by gyldenlove on Jan 12, 2010 2:15 PM MST reply actions  

I disagree to a point

You have to run the ball well on first and/or second down to set up the short range pass. We were able to gain large chunks of yards at will early in the season on earlier downs, and thus it became easier for us to move the chains via the pass.

by Sayre Bedinger on Jan 12, 2010 2:45 PM MST up reply actions  

RB's vs Rushing attack

I give our RB’s a B. Moreno ran for 947 yards which led all rookies & was 16th overall. Buckhalter ran for 642 yards and averaged 5.4 ypc. All this behind a line that lost their starting RT to injury and saw a massive decline in the play of the LG & C from just 1 year ago.

Our rushing attack however I would give a C. We finished 15th in ypc at 4.2. Not horrible but not good, just average; which I attribute more to poor line play than to the RB’s.

Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein

Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein

by c_style on Jan 12, 2010 8:50 PM MST reply actions  

When Harris went down, there went a lot of our running game.

I gave our RBs a B. You don’t run thru holes that aren’t there. I not only fault our OL but also the play calling. The OL was switching to the power blocking and going away from ZB. We saw a mixture of the 2. Jeremy Bolander did an excellent comment after the Philly game on John’s interview with McD about how our OL guys worked with each system.
Play calling: I wonder what McCoy would have done? He used to be with the Panthers. McD is very capable but I think he needs to delegate more.

When Buck was injured, Moreno missed the blow of the rotation. I hope that JJ Arrington can play for us this fall. He could return kicks as well. He is a good blocker as well.

I like the idea of drafting a dominant OG and OC. However, that doesn’t mean that they will start and be a powerhouse at their position from day 1. It takes weeks to catchup to the NFL game speed. I like the idea of a RB but not in the 1st 2-3 rounds. The OL and DL need the infusion. If Marshall is dealt, I am expecting a 2nd and a 3rd rather than a 1st rounder. If it were Cleveland or Washington, these would be high picks in each round. Also more money conscious for the Broncos front office to absorb.

I didn’t realize that Parcells used the Erhardt-Perkins system when he won the SB in 1991. He won because of the running game.

Nice post, Sayre. Thanks for your time and energy.

by Blackknigh on Jan 12, 2010 11:25 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgres_small
Are You Nuts? No Plan B?
Oc_small
I NEED YOUR HELP MHR: The Down Under Bowl

Recent FanPosts

Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick Really Worth? Pt. 2.
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
Glad for Gronkowski
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick REALLY Worth?
Index_small
Nate Irving!
Fhgfhgfhg_small
Rod Smith is a Hall of Famer....Right?
205783_109706759113985_100002239833864_101133_7230028_n_small
My Final 53
00000021_small
J-Man 2012 NFL preview First of 3 Editions
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Payette_011_small
3 X 80 = ???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Broncos-von-miller_small Scotty Payne

Ph_small BroncoPH

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall