Mile High Report: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: The Nova Blog for Villanova Fans!

NFL releases 'CBA Fact-Sheet' regarding Un-Capped Year

To help bring understanding and clarification to the complex topic of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, the NFL released the following Q&A fact sheet:

Q. When does the CBA expire should there be no extension to the agreement?

A. In March of 2011.

Q. Will there be a college draft in 2011?

A. Yes.

Q. What is the "Final League Year" in the current agreement?

A. The "Final League Year" is the term used in the CBA to refer to the last year of the agreement. Without a further extension of the CBA, the "Final League Year" would be the 2010 League Year, which begins on March 5.

Q. What are the differences between the "Final League Year" and any other "League Year?"

A. The principal differences are that in the "Final League Year" there is no salary cap and there are substantial additional restrictions on player free agency and reductions in player benefits.

Star-divide

Q. Are current player benefits affected in the Final League Year?

A. We expect current player benefits to decline in the Final League Year. The union agreed that in the Final League Year, clubs would be relieved of their obligation to fund numerous benefit programs. Examples include second career savings (401K), player annuity, severance pay and performance-based pay. The total league-wide contributions to such plans in 2009, the last capped year, were in excess of $325 million or more than $10 million per club.

Q. Are retired player benefits affected in the Final League Year?

A. Commissioner Goodell has stated in a letter to the NFL Alumni Association Board of Directors that there will be no reduction in pension or disability payments to retired players during the Final League Year (2010). Since at least the fall of 2007, NFL owners have consistently agreed and planned that they will not reduce the funding for pension or disability benefits for retired players. Nor will they reduce funding for the 88 Plan during the Final League Year.

Q. What determines an unrestricted free agent in the Final League Year (2010)?

A. In capped seasons, a player whose contract has expired becomes an unrestricted free agent if he has four or more accrued seasons. In the Final League Year (2010), a player whose contract has expired becomes an unrestricted free agent only if he has six or more accrued seasons. An unrestricted free agent is free to sign with any club with no compensation owed to his old club.

Q. What determines whether a player is a restricted free agent in the "Final League Year?"

A. In capped seasons, a player whose contract expires becomes a restricted free agent if he has three accrued seasons. In the Final League Year (2010), a player whose contract expires becomes a restricted free agent if he has three, four or five accrued seasons. The first refusal/compensation rights of restricted free agents remain unchanged in the Final League Year.

Q. In addition to the right to designate a franchise (or transition) player each capped year, can clubs designate additional players in the Final League Year?

A. Yes, one additional player can be tagged. In capped years, a club may designate a franchise player or a transition player. In the final league year (2010), a club may designate one additional transition player. A transition player must be offered a minimum of the average of the top 10 salaries of the prior season at the player's position or 120 percent of the player's prior year's salary, whichever is greater. A transition player designation gives the club a first-refusal right to match within seven days an offer sheet given to the player by another club after his contract expires. If the club matches, it retains the player. If it does not match, it receives no draft pick compensation from that club.

Q. What is the Final Eight Plan?

A. During the Final League Year, the eight clubs that make the Divisional Playoffs in the previous season have additional restrictions that limit their ability to sign unrestricted free agents from other clubs. In general, the four clubs participating in the championship games are limited in the number of free agents that they may sign; the limit is determined by the number of their own free agents signing with other clubs. They cannot sign any UFAs unless one of theirs is signed by another team.

For the four clubs that lost in the Divisional Playoffs, in addition to having the ability to sign free agents based on the number of their own free agents signing with other clubs, they may also sign players based on specific financial parameters. Those four only will be permitted to sign one unrestricted free agent for $5.5 million (estimated) or more in year one of the contract, plus the number of their UFAs who sign with another team. They also can sign any unrestricted free agents for less than $3.7 (estimated) million in year one of the contract with limitations on the per year increases.

In the case of all final eight teams, the first year salary of UFAs they sign to replace those lost cannot exceed the first year salary of the player lost with limitations on the per year increases.

Q. Is there an Entering Player Pool in the Final League Year?

A. There may be. The CBA provides that the league has the unilateral right to keep or eliminate the rookie pool in the Final League Year.

Q. Is there a Minimum Team Salary in the Final League Year?

A. There is no Minimum Team Salary in the Final League Year. The Minimum Team Salary in 2009 is $107,748,000, meaning each team is required to allocate more than $107 million to player costs (not including benefits). The team salary cap in 2009 was $123 million.

Q. Are there individual player minimum salaries in the Final League Year?

A. Yes, but they rise at a rate somewhat slower than player minimum salaries rise in capped years.

Q. Do any player contract rules from capped years remain in place for the Final League Year?

A. Yes, some rules like the "30% increase rule" are still in effect in the Final League Year for player contracts signed in capped years. That rule restricts salary increases from 2009 to 2010. For example: a player with a $500,000 salary in 2009 would be limited to annual salary increases of $150,000 ($500,000 x 30%) beginning in 2010.

2 recs  |  Comment 43 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thanks John

Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!

"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown

by Jon Tollerud on Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Wow thanks John,

Sounds like the Dolts are going to have slim pickens in UFA this year.

"I played hurt, shot up whatever was needed to win. Call me stupid, maybe, but I wanted to win regardless of the cost to me personally."- Mark Cooper

by diviesti on Jan 20, 2010 12:37 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

The downside of having a first round bye.

and losing that game as well.

2009 NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant

by weazel on Jan 20, 2010 1:19 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Cool, like that gotcha

The Chargers saga just gets better. It’s good to be a Bronco

by WYO(MF)BRONCOBOY on Jan 20, 2010 1:45 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

No, because it is a "Final League Year".

That means that you are only an unrestricted FA if you’ve accrued 6 years in the league. He hasn’t.

In the Final League Year (2010), a player whose contract expires becomes a restricted free agent if he has three, four or five accrued seasons

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Why has nobody made a live-action game of Chutes and Ladders? I'd be first in line.

by kentuckybronco on Jan 20, 2010 1:50 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

You didn’t read that very well.

In an uncapped year like 2010, a player must have 6 or more years of NFL service to be an UFA.

Marshall has four, Orton has five so both those guys are restricted free agents and Denver WILL receive compensation if another team signs either one.

Unfortunately for us, Ben Hamilton is free to walk as a UFA. Oh darn

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 1:51 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I didn't know that Hamilton

was a free agent. That sucks. I was counting on the Skins giving us like a 3rd or 4th in 2011 for him. He’s too light for us, but he started every game for Mike since like ’01 (except ’07).

Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!

by elvisalex on Jan 20, 2010 2:28 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

We couldn’t trade Hamilton for a sack of old carrotts at this point.

San Diego Super Chokers – The annual preseason Champs, eternal post season chumps. Stay Classy

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 6:51 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I can't tell if he is joking about the skins

given our trading history with them (which is mythical—in every sense of the word) or if he is making a comment on the Shanny + Danny equation.

Both are somewhat scary, but for different reasons…

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 20, 2010 6:55 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Weird rules about the final 8 playoff teams.

The removal of the minimum salary floor is going to kill teams like KC, Buffalo and Cincy with their cheap ownership. I’d hate to be a fan of a team that cuts salary just to make a profit (even if it means 0-16). I’m sure you’ll see a few non competitive teams just mail in 2010. Could be some horrible teams next season.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 1:54 PM MST reply actions   1 recs

I was thinking the same thing

I guess if you figure say maybe six teams go cheap, and 8 teams have their hands tied… That’s what like 40% of the NFL that won’t be actively seeking much in free agency? This should be a good thing for a team willing to go after FA’s

Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!

by elvisalex on Jan 20, 2010 2:33 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Just another reason for us to thank our stars that we have Bowlen

Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein

Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein

by c_style on Jan 20, 2010 6:33 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Unless it was Bowlen that ordered Denver to trade away their #1 pick in 2010 so we wouldn’t have to pay a higher pick and likely better player from that draft.

San Diego Super Chokers – The annual preseason Champs, eternal post season chumps. Stay Classy

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 6:53 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

When it comes to the way Bowlen runs his business, that’s his business. I do however truly believe that Bowlen wants to to win as bad as we do and he will do whatever is in his power to accomplish that.

Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein

Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein

by c_style on Jan 20, 2010 8:15 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe…

San Diego Super Chokers – The annual preseason Champs, eternal post season chumps. Stay Classy

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 8:58 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I also can’t imagine the 2011 draft will be any good if there is no NFL football to play that year. That draft would not have ONE Jr. or redshirt Soph declare with nowhere to go. Seniors would be taking red shirts to have an extra year of college football.

If Denver does any trading back like Seattle and San Fran did last season, we should take 2012 draft picks instead of picks in 2011.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 1:57 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

How do you even have a draft if games are not going to be played?

by Todd Jewell on Jan 20, 2010 2:08 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I know right? I don’t get what the owners are doing here with this CBA mess.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 4:10 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Sounds like Belichick really screwed up on that Seymour trade then

Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein

Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein

by c_style on Jan 20, 2010 6:36 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

It all depends on the new CBA. Do you see the 2011 draft being any good if there is not football to play that year. Can’t see too many underclassmen or 4th year Jrs. with a redshirt that would be jumping at the chance to enter a leauge with no games being played.

San Diego Super Chokers – The annual preseason Champs, eternal post season chumps. Stay Classy

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 6:55 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

would they just not have a draft? move all picks back a year?

by Todd Jewell on Jan 20, 2010 7:12 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

That's an interesting comment

At the time, I took that trade to be an indication that Bob Kraft was confident not just that there would be a new CBA, but also that there would be a rookie wage scale as well. Maybe he misjudged the severity of the situation.

Belief is accepting something because you’ve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.

by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 21, 2010 1:45 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

This whole CBA thing has my head spinning. What the heck are the owners thinking? The NFL has never been so popular and now the owners want to change everything… Does that make sense to anyone?

Bena?
  

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 1:59 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

to me the biggest thing is the rookie wage scale — it has to change and I think veterans should agree with that, I just don’t think they believe the $ saved will actually get spent on them.

The #1 draft pick shouldnt start off making more than almost every player at his position [DT] before he has taken one significant snap.

by Todd Jewell on Jan 20, 2010 2:08 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the rookie wage scale will be a very small and easy problem to solve. They’ll get an NBA like cap. The current rookie contract mess will get fixed.

You’re probably right. If the rookies get capped, the vets will want to see a lot of that wood, but the owners won’t want to share the savings.

It’s the revenue sharing, 18 games, players funding new stadiums that will be impossible to fix if the owners try to re-invent the wheel.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 4:19 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Here is the deal

this is from the article in Horse Tracks.
The crux of negotiations is how to divide a revenue pie of about $8.5 billion. The current collective bargaining agreement calls for players to receive nearly 60 percent of revenue, but union leaders are concerned that the $8.5 billion does not represent the true revenue pool available to players because of credits owners receive to pay for league costs like NFL Network.

The union views the real percentage players receive as closer to 51 percent, and union leaders think owners want a rollback of 18 percent, which would put the players’ share at about 33 percent. The union has insisted that owners provide financial information to prove their situation is dire enough to merit a rollback.

The owners’ position is that the 18 percent would come from additional credits against the revenue base. The effect on veteran players would be mitigated by, among other things, a proposed rookie salary cap that would make more money available to pay veteran players and a restructured season that, with additional regular-season games, would produce more revenue. Owners think they need the additional money to invest in things like new stadiums and that current players would not experience a decline in overall compensation.

Both sides seem to agree that a rookie cap is necessary to redirect money to current and retired players.

An e-mail message from the union leader DeMaurice Smith to player representatives obtained by ESPN this month said the union had proposed a plan that would redirect money that from rookies to veterans.

Owners would like a rookie wage scale to be implemented in time for the 2010 draft class, even if there is no new collective bargaining agreement. The savings from the first year, estimated at around $200 million, could then go to a fund for retired players.

"We’d rather have money going to retired players and veteran players as opposed to unproven rookies," Mara said.

The need for a limit on rookie wages may be the only common ground players and management have.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks

by KaptainKirk on Jan 20, 2010 6:34 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I was going to mention

the retroactive rookie cap below, but thankfully I scrolled up when you posted, and don’t need to repeat it. What i find interesting about it, is that the NFL tabled the original proposal of endowing a fund for retired players with the savings reaped from a rookie cap, and now the PA is taking the prompt up in earnest. Frankly, if they balk at the idea, they will cut the Retired players out of the loop pretty effectively, so it is really no surprise, but the built in concession of making it retroactive to include 2010 (in order to benefit said retirees now) really seems to show a lot of owners ex machina….

What really remains to be seen is just what it is going to take (and to what degree) to get the owner’s to show their financial information. They are waiting for something. Maybe attrition, maybe the final ruling of the American Needle case.

It is reasonable to hazard guesses at what we aren’t hearing about… things that will probably never be made public. Maybe the NFl sees the cost of expanding the NFL to be too expensive to undertake at the current split, with infighting among the owners about who is getting stadiums built and who isn’t. Also, the NFL really seems to be taking the “single entity” possibility to heart….if it removes incentive for individual owner’s to drive franchise success, I think they will sorely regret it. It reminds me of Stringer Bell in the Wire wanting to transmogrify “the game” into business, while Avon wanted to keep banging heads. Two different conceptions of what it means to hold power over others, but both have the same result….

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 20, 2010 6:51 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I guess neither of you guys saw when Goodell told everyone that there would not be a rookie cap for the 2010 draft. He said this over a year ago and it had a huge impact on the 2009 draft when a lot of guys thinking about coming out decided to return to school.

Unless Goodell wants to go back on what he said so bluntly, a rookie cap in 2010 is not happening.

And for the record, I think a rookie cap is a great great idea.

San Diego Super Chokers – The annual preseason Champs, eternal post season chumps. Stay Classy

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 7:02 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I saw the comment

but I don’t think he will consider himself beholden to it.

I agree, the rookie cap is a much-needed solution. What will be interesting is if the NFL ever finds itself (in some far off future) capable of creating a framework where you don’t need arbitrary caps, nor do you see out of control wage scales. Economies on gold standards enjoyed this kind of rational prosperity, but it might be a leap to think the NFL has any such possibility for a gold standard….

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 20, 2010 7:09 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I saw it McGeorge

but when I read on a few different occasions that Roger stated that everyone was Pro Rookie Cap, I figured that it wouldn’t be an issue any longer. With the owners guaranteed the TV money, they can’t really think to fool everyone else that they are broke. I agree with Jeremy that the American Needle case is holding things up somewhat. I believe the next attempt will be back in the courts to certify the league as its own entity, and exempt from Anti-Trust lawsuits.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks

by KaptainKirk on Jan 20, 2010 7:26 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Which in turn

removes the power of the union to decertify and reorganize to sue the NFL, which was their strategy in the last lockout….

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 20, 2010 7:29 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Goodell would kill his word with college’s and players if he goes against himself on the 2010 rookie cap. I HIGHLY doubt he will contradict himself like that.

I’m quite certain there will be a rookie cap when the next CBA is in place.

San Diego Super Chokers – The annual preseason Champs, eternal post season chumps. Stay Classy

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 7:50 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Major League Baseball

Is currently anti-trust proof, yet they’re the furthest of the major sports, in mind mind, of working as a single entitiy (see yankees, pirates). From the salary floors and ceilings the NFL all ready has in place, it seems they’d be a natural to be considered singular. Collusion between teams in the same league is a far cry from say, the NFL and XFL having handshakes and beers around economic agreements.

If I understand this remotely (dollars to donuts I don’t), I’d rather have my favorite league, as a fan, be considered singular. I abhor the structure of MLB and much prefer some semblance of level playing fields for all teams within a given league. I think the NBA has done some smart work with rookie salaries as well as team caps with the luxury tax exception.

by oxmouth on Jan 20, 2010 11:00 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the NBA had no choice

There are less players and it is much more of a Millionaire Thug Club. Less people involved, less infighting.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks

by KaptainKirk on Jan 21, 2010 10:42 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

No, not to me

But more often than not, nothing gets done until it’s crunch time, until things go into crisis management mode. Towards the end of this next season they’ll likely be working hard at

Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!

by elvisalex on Jan 20, 2010 2:31 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not generally a conspiracy theorist

but looking at the rules for playoff teams, I wonder if McD realized this team did not have a shot at the whole enchilada so he opted to not go all out just to get to the playoffs.

Step aside, my friend, I been doin' it for years.
Said sit on down, open ya eyes, say open up ya ears....

by pubkeeper on Jan 20, 2010 2:41 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

If that is the case, I hope we fire him tomorrow.

But I doubt it, McDaniels has said he is a guy that has a history of winning.

I'm so angry at the Broncos right now.

by McGeorge on Jan 20, 2010 4:20 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Conspiracy Theory

Too much at stake for a rookie head coach to throw games away. McD needs as many W’s as he can get or he will be gone before too long. He knows that, so there’s no way McD would make that decision. If that decision was made, it would have been made by Bowlen.

I don’t think that’s what happened. I was just running with the topic.

Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein

Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein

by c_style on Jan 20, 2010 6:56 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Pubkeeper

So far so good for me and McDaniels but if it was true he lost to set up the team for the future – I can’t support that. I also think there is zero chance Josh loses on purpose for any reason.

by pastordan on Jan 20, 2010 3:50 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

This is a onesided take on the "Rules" for the final league year

A lot of this stuff is accurate, but look at one of their shortest, and in my mind curtest, answers:

“Yes.” to the question about whether there will be a 2011 draft. They don’t know that yet. There is no provision in the current CBA which says that the draft will continue to be held if they don’t get something sorted out on the bargaining table. It is obvious that the Player’s Association didn’t have a lot of say in the release of this information.

This document is a power move by the NFL to define (in the minds of the consumers) many of the terms of engagement, including retiree benefits, and the rookie player pool. The PA needs to start “playing the game…” (I’m on season 3 of the Wire.)

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 20, 2010 6:40 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!
Start posting about the Broncos »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bronco-pride_small
A Little Coaching Perspective
Tjpic1_small
The Dude's Mail Sack: A Cage Match Between Jarvis Moss and Marcus Nash!
Al-wilson-punish-wr-broncos_small
Against the Grain (New Poll)
Broncohoodie_in_africa_small
Sending Them Off the Right Way
Milehighsalute_small
"Profile"! Don't Profile Me Ya' Bum! Brady Quinn

Recent FanPosts

Uncle-sam_small
Rising and Falling of the Coach
Hpim2076_small
ST's-The Punt Return
800px-john_brown_painting_small
Win-Loss Kool-Aid flavors
003_small
Mock Draft keeping Marshall/Scheffler
Img_1105_small
The System...
Denver_broncos_small
The Fans Draft Strategy
Spence___jt_small
Haze's Quick Draft Pt.4
Bronco7fans-fantasylogosimple_small
2010 Mock Draft V. 1

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

SPONSORS

Web Stuff

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

Dez Bryant To Work Out For The Cowboys

Photo link

Bust-O-Meter: Oklahoma State WR Dez Bryant

Photo

Florida's Joe Haden Improves Forty Yard Dash Time

More from SBNation.com >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

Cyborg_small Jeremy Bolander

Asst. Head Coach

Mhr_small Steve Nichols

Tahoetim_small Tim Lynch

Tjpic1_small TJ Johnson

Broncos_camp_2_054_small Sayre Bedinger

Position Coach

Bronco-pride_small BShrout

Me_as_a_simpson_small ejruiz

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk