2010 NFL Draft Players to Watch
I want to take a different approach. I love the NFL draft (like most people on this site), and I am excited for the Broncos' possibilities this year (like most people on this site). I also noticed two features of last year's draft that makes me want to do something different than a mock.
First of all, I noticed how many trades there were. I also noticed how many of those trades were performed by McDaniels/Xander & Co. This, to me, strongly indicates that attempting to predict which teams will pick at which spots is... well, enjoyable but pretty fruitless. Second, I noticed that apart from Alphonso Smith and Knowshon Moreno, I had no name recognition of the Broncos' picks. I relied on MHR analysis to fill me in on the details after the fact. This was effective, but left me feeling a bit ad hoc. Did I like this guy simply because he was a Bronco, or because of the excellent facts presented, or because I didn't want to think badly of the Bronco brass? This, coupled with a very large amount of risers/fallers, indicated to me that trying to figure out which players will go where is a) far too much information for me to handle, and b) outside the scope of my knowledge of the player pool.
So, I want to rectify this for myself and hopefully for others this year. I want to start a series of posts looking at a few players handpicked for their fit into the Broncos system. What is that? The Broncos' system will here be defined by the following criteria:
1) Tough, smart, intelligent, versatile players who are team players and team leaders
2) Amoeba offense that utilizes multiple skill sets
3) Power running game
4) High-percentage passing game
5) 3-4 concept defense that shows 4-3 and 5-2 looks
6) Emphasis on special teams play
From here, I will look at a few players graded in the early rounds (1-3) and scour current player evaluations to gain an understanding of which players at certain positions are good fits for us. I will put pictures and -- where feasible -- videos up as well, to help people put images with words. These will be nowhere near as in-depth as Tales from the Sunnyside or anything like that, but they can at least familiarize myself (and hopefully others as well) with the talent pool from a Bronco vantage point. They will also not be comprehensive -- I'm only focusing on the first few rounds because... well, time for one, sanity for another, and my own lack of a scouting eye finally. Speaking of that, there is a bit of a drawback because I am using second-hand reports by the (*shudder*) mainstream media. Unfortunately, however, I have no game tape and no firsthand scouting reports. So, I will attempt to minimize the MSM bias by including notes from several sources.
So...
I'll begin by attaching a poll regarding where you want me to start. I'll leave it up for a week (please recommend to keep it visible), and then go in the order of the final results. Without further ado, then:
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
16 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
another thing to keep in mind is that McDaniels seemed different [from what I remember] in that the players he drafted were ones we talked to, where Shanahan would do a lot of misdirection it seemed
I agree
Although, like I mention below, it’s hard to say if that was a function of the time crunch he experienced due to being hired in late January and not having a season of “his guys” scouting players. Will he do the same this year? It’s hard to say, but my money is on him picking guys who he actually interviews, since intelligence and leadership are such high priorities for him.
"I only know as much about myself as my mind can work out under its current conditions. And its current conditions are not good." -- Zaphod Beeblebrox
by Sharpe as a Tack on Jan 27, 2010 10:18 AM MST up reply actions
Now THIS is the place to start from
and the best idea in the past 3 weeks. Go for it Sharpe!
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
Thanks for the props!
I hope this helps others, and isn’t just an exercise for my own sake.
The overall goal is not to predict who McDaniels will pick (or who will be available at our picks), but which guys might be on his “short board” — although whether that was a function of compressed time or actual philosophy is up for debate.
After a while, all the mocks get kinda pie-in-the-sky and blur together. I tend to think that their main function is to make us so excited that the actual results are guaranteed to let us down. Hopefully this will do the opposite: get name recognition for someone besides the usual suspects (i.e., Iupati, Pouncey, Haden, Bryant, McClain, etc.) and get us excited in advance for numerous players instead of a few favorites.
"I only know as much about myself as my mind can work out under its current conditions. And its current conditions are not good." -- Zaphod Beeblebrox
by Sharpe as a Tack on Jan 27, 2010 10:16 AM MST up reply actions
Good!
Hope it lives up to your expectations.
"I only know as much about myself as my mind can work out under its current conditions. And its current conditions are not good." -- Zaphod Beeblebrox
by Sharpe as a Tack on Jan 27, 2010 10:18 AM MST up reply actions
Thanks for sharing this Sharpe
I voted STs by the way…:) Just trying to have all the bases covered!
I view draft preparation in a particular way. Most MHR followers know that I have been pretty into covering the draft, and that has been the case since about 2003-2004 or so. My methods have changed appreciably form one year to the next, but certain core ideas have not. I wrote reports professionally for a year, and the access I found during that time significantly upgraded what I was able to do, but still, the core ideas remained the same.
Step One: Know the Seniors.
Every draft class has a fundamental “feel” to it, and this is established by the Seniors. i maintain a database, upgrading college players every year as they matriculate, and this alone, keeping track of height, weight, stats, school, is amazingly useful, because when their senior year rolls around, I feel like I have a general familiarity with that draft class. Through this process names are highlighted, mainly as sophmores and juniors, with some freshmen thrown in, and this is where the “notes” begin. I don’t watch college football, except to follow Boise in the WAC, so what I am looking for here are “cues” that warrant further investigation. Your point on time management is critical here, since a person could waste a phenomenal amount of time getting into this stuff, with mild at best prospects for production (re:dollars). this isn’t a thought process in the early stages, it is simply streamlined database management. A good database speeds everything up. Then as the senior season plays out I track names off the wires, big games, interviews, that sort of thing. This is like absorbing horsetracks in the morning, lots of speedreading throughout the year. Still nothing intensive. Mostly I busy myself with watching and analyzing the Broncos. I also try to see a couple fo games a week, on torrents. With a good database, you can design a schedule picker that selects games from the schedule that give you a lot of bang for your buck, allowiing you to watch multiple prospects. By the time the season is over, the names, positions and general impressions of all the seniors are familiar, and you have even had a chance to watch many of them for a firsthanded opinion. If you ever get to the stage of trying to present data based off of what you are watching, my advice is to avoid reading analysis on the players. Just read reports on their games, articles, interviews, that sort of thing, since any lack of confidence in your abilitites to accurately scout will show up as being influenced easily by “pro” reports. to this day I try not to even look at a mock draft until around the Senior Bowl.
Step Two: Add the Juniors.
Some juniors just stand out, and you will most likely have an easy time keeping track of them in the news. Tebow is a guy who I have been keeping a full report on since he was a sophmore. Regardless, you know for sure who needs to be covered around the middle of January when the players have to declare. All of these names need to be moved to your front page (or equivalent) in your system. I spend January looking at Juniors almost exclusively, plus any top performers at the all-star games, or surprising names, that sort of thing. This isn’t as tough as it may sound, as a good target is right around 30 or so Juniors. We had 50+ this year declare, but a lot of them can be ignored, except to scan their school stats, that sort of thing. Their reasoning for declaring is because of the CBA mostly, so the bottom half of that class isn’t particularly relevant. When you get the Junior class layered in, you now have a very thorough grasp of this years draft “flavor” for lack of a better word. You can feel how strong it is, what positions it is weaker at. I get sidetracked all the time by late-night analysis of things like how many late round DBs are available, which are just ways of further familiarizing yourself with the ebb and flow of likely draft day scenarios.
Step Three: Build a Big Board
I give myself a deadline for this, where I start on the day after the Senior Bowl (the official first day of Draftivus:) ) and this year my deadline is March 12th. Whether a player fits or not, and where they rank overall are things you can determine in advance of Free Agency, but you probably need about a week to adjust “need” considerations after free agency starts.
Step Four: Familiarize yourself with the draft process.
Lots of ways to do this, but my preferred way is to test the big board out in mock drafts. I can only say wonderful things about Draftek and last year I had a lot of fun running simulations on it. I must have ran about thirty, with different criteria, and I published two of them and my thought process in each one here on MHR. The feedback from that was a blast, and worth the time that was needed to get there. I couldn’t have been more wrong about team needs, but that was an amorphous concept last year with the new coaching staff. I didn’t forsee at all the heavy targetting of Oline and Dbackfield, but I think MHR as a whole will be much clearer on these issues, which will help all of our analysis.
Step Five: Have fun.
There is no limit to the creative ways you can use the data you collect. And it doesn’t end on draft day. Knowledge is the gift that keeps on giving!
Good luck Sharpe, and keep us up to date. The feedback from the community is probably the greatest reward for the work, so don’t hold nuthin’ back! The steps I outlined above aren’t intended to get you to do something similar, it is just to point out that no matter what I have tried in the past, from guessing who we are taking to profiling every player, to writing WAC reports for a few bucks a pop, some things have always stayed the same: know the seniors, know the juniors, make a shortboard or bigboard(impossible without knowing who is who), and know the context of the draft. And of course, have fun. Looking forward to seeing what names you manage to distill in the process.
And if you could, get those punter and kicker reports up asap? :) I admit to having never watched them or paid any attention to them. I wouldn’t even know what to look for…
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
"That's MR.Styg..."
by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 27, 2010 10:29 AM MST reply actions 6 recs
forgot the combine
although it is essentialy part of steps one and two. You will have questions that weren’t answered about many of the players, such as "Why does he struggle against pres coverage, or “Can he handle the NFl level press coverage”, things like that. the combine and the period of time around the combine are a good time to try and address them. Without a personal interview, knowing a player about ~40% is probably the best you can hope for, but right around the combine there are lots of radio and article interviews where the players get asked the questions that you specifically want to know about. It is the time when you fill in the holes on your knowledge of the players, and with any luck, address specifically how well they could fit for the Broncos scheme. An example would be someone like OLB O’Brien Scheffield, who was a DE in college, but might fit the Broncos scheme as a 3-4 outside LB. This is an open question as of the end of the college season, but the allstar games afforded an opportunity to watch him run drills, practice, and play standing up. (as a sidenote, he was injured in the Senior Bowl, so that is the last we are going to see of him for a while…)
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
"That's MR.Styg..."
by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 27, 2010 11:26 AM MST up reply actions
Thank you very much for the suggestions!
Navigating this morass can be extremely daunting, and it is very helpful to have the advice of someone who has done this. I’ll need to take your advice to heart next year about building a database that “follows” prospects throughout their career.
Right now, due to limited time/resources/etc., I’ll have to pay attention to the pro scouting, and maybe scour MHR for some of your (or others’) articles. I’m hoping that this will be less of a “Sharpe’s Infallible Scouting Opinion” report and more of an attempt to provide a Broncos filter to the pro scouting reports. The more honest analysis will have to wait for another year.
I love Draftek as well, mostly for their customization protocol. I’ve been on Mocking the Draft and tried to set up a database on my own with fan-generated info regarding team needs, in order to set up a simulation that takes into account the opinion of those closest to the action (without getting paid to be so). It’s pretty sketchy, and some of the personalities on that site can be more than a little off-putting, but it’s a start. Out of curiosity, do you usually agree with their big board/player rankings or not?
I’m hoping to build a short board off of this and the feedback from it; we’ll see if I can stick with it!
"I only know as much about myself as my mind can work out under its current conditions. And its current conditions are not good." -- Zaphod Beeblebrox
by Sharpe as a Tack on Jan 27, 2010 11:55 AM MST up reply actions
Awesome, Sharpe and quickly rec'd
Good luck, I can’t wait to see your results. There’s just so much out there, I love your idea of putting a “Bronco filter” on some of it to being it closer to home.
Step aside, my friend, I been doin' it for years.
Said sit on down, open ya eyes, say open up ya ears....
Looking forward to it and rec'd
Great idea. I don’t watch all that much college ball. So after the first round and a half last year, I didn’t know many of the players comming off the board, let alone our own 5th round picks, etc..
I was in the same boat in sounds like, in that I supported the guys because they were new Broncos, but it would have been nice to have an opinion and knowledge on them before we called their name. So yeah, I’m on board and looking forward to learning more about offensive linemen after the usual wish lists suspects.
Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!
Now we're talking
This has the potential to be much more useful than the mock drafts we’ve been seeing (no offence to the mock drafters – keep doing what you’re doing). You appear to randomly be responding to a request I made to Sayre…are you the same person????
“If you have time do you think you would be able to put together a board of say 20-30 players who would be good fits for the Broncos (minus projected rounds etc)? Kinda like a mini-McDaniels draft board.
I ask for 2 reasons: (1) you know more about the players coming through the draft than i do. (2) be wary of developing a consensus regarding certain players in the draft.
otherwise, thanks for your work and keep it up!”
Haha, for the record I was torn between OL and DL so either of those would be great
Nope -- I'm just me :)
I’ve wanted to see this done, and no one else has stepped up, so I did.
I hope, eventually, to get a short board developed off of the results of this research and feedback from the community.
"I only know as much about myself as my mind can work out under its current conditions. And its current conditions are not good." -- Zaphod Beeblebrox
by Sharpe as a Tack on Jan 27, 2010 2:54 PM MST up reply actions
Tremendous Idea
Can’t wait to see what you have to offer us.
Really?
No one wants to see a work-up on either offensive or defensive backfield?
Is that because the others are such fantastically pressing needs, or because people think we’re set very much, thank you, at those positions? I’m curious for those who passed on the backfields.
"I only know as much about myself as my mind can work out under its current conditions. And its current conditions are not good." -- Zaphod Beeblebrox
by Sharpe as a Tack on Jan 28, 2010 10:51 AM MST reply actions
I chose O' Line
Because I could see 2 or 3 potential draft picks in that specific area, whereas my guess is that only one cb and one rb is likely. I’ll be looking forward to any/all that you put up, but chose the position group where the most names are likely to be caleld.
Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!

by 


























