Broncos End-of-Season Wrap Up - It's Knee-Jerk Time!
I am never one to have a knee-jerk reaction to anything. I like to take my time, think things through, and then make a decision. Once it is made it is made and I move forward, rarely looking back. Obviously, with the way the season ended, there are plenty of knee-jerk reactions going on, and they serve a purpose - we are angry, we are disappointed and we want better from the Broncos. It's been over 30 years since this team went 4 seasons in a row without a post-season berth - as far as the Broncos go, this drought is historic.
At some point, however, we need to start looking at solutions, not problems. I have asked the members of MileHighReport to be a step above - sure, complain about what you don't like, but come with ways to fix it. Don't like Kyle Orton, then who should the starting QB be next year? You get the idea.
After sleeping on it, and keeping my thoughts under wraps for a few weeks as the season wound down, I have a few 'knee-jerk' reactions of my own.
Regarding Brandon Marshall - Good Riddance. That's harsh, I know, and will likely be unpopular with many of you. Fine, but I have seen enough with my two eyes to get what is going on here and frankly, I'm done with it. Brandon Marshall plays hard when Brandon wants to play hard. Marshall had a great season in 2009. He's a Pro Bowler and he deserves it. His actions, however, both prior to the season - missing all of the off-season workouts, his training camp temper-tantrum - and this past week or so proved to me what we all really knew all-along.
Brandon Marshall plays for Brandon Marshall.
His play against the Eagles - including a lackluster effort to go after a 50/50 ball - combined with the injury he sustained and his actions after, show that Marshall needs more than winning to motivate him. In his mind, 100 catches was the threshold, the golden nugget to get his big contract. When he eclipsed it, his effort and focus seemed to wane. Against the Eagles, Marshall made 8 catches for 39 yards(4.9 ypc), easily his worst output of the season (minus the Baltimore game). This came on 13 official targets.
Obviously the coaching staff noticed since the latest rift started when Marshall was criticized during a film session. Of course, Marshall didn't like it, injured himself during the first practice after this film session, and was late for a rehab appointment.
To his credit, Marshall did say all the right things in the locker room today...
"I’m not sure, that’s not my decision," Marshall said. "It’s up to my agent and the Broncos.
"I love playing football and I love being a Bronco. I’m going to take these next couple of months and enjoy my family."
He then proceeded to clean out his belongings and remove his name. Actions speak louder than words, Brandon.
Tony Scheffler - Scheffler's deal is a bit different, regardless of being unfairly lumped together with Marshall this week. If the reason for his benching is true, if he was overheard saying he couldn't wait for the season to be over, then the benching was 100% deserved. Like John Elway said this morning on the Vic and Gary Show, he knew of players that got cut for making comments that offended a coach.
"At some point you have to remember he's your boss," said Elway.
For Tony, however, that was frustration bubbling over. McDaniels' offense is not a good fit for Scheffler, and it isn't his fault. I believe he gave 100% this season and I believe he tried to make it work. The best thing for Tony Scheffler is to find a team that utilizes the Tight End in a way that maximizes Scheffler's talent.
Sure, it is a coach's responsibility to be flexible, to mold his philosophy around the players he has, but a coach still has that philosophy and will always be looking for the players to fit that plan. Scheffler is a great example.
I highly doubt Scheffler will be back, and I wish him nothing but the best!
Offensive Line - There may not have been a bigger injury this season than Ryan Harris for the Broncos. The O-Line depth was a worry going into the season. Harris getting hurt, coupled with Ben Hamilton's struggles, made life very, very tough up front for the Broncos. At its core, the NFL is a simple game - you have to beat the man in front of you. The Broncos did not win the line of scrimmage in 8 of their final 10 games. They lost all 8.
People blame Knowshon Moreno for the issues in short yardage, and blame Orton and McDaniels for not going vertical with the passing game - yet the common denominator to both is consistent play along the offensive line. It might be priority one for the Broncos. They were able to throw for well over 400 yards yesterday without Marshall. In order to win, however, they need to become a dominant running team again, and that starts up front.
As I look at it now, Ryan Harris and Ryan Clady are safe. After that, all bets are off. Word is the Broncos like Chris Kuper, but Casey Wiegmann and Russ Hochstein/Ben Hamilton are needed upgrades in the middle - whether that is through the Draft or Free Agency. The Broncos need to get bigger and meaner.
Coaching Changes? - Right now, I can see two coaches bolting - Rick Dennison and Bobby Turner. With Mike Shanahan likely to be named the coach of the Washington Redskins any moment, Dennison and Turner will likely follow him, and like Scheffler, it is probably for the better. Both teach a system that doesn't fit with what Josh McDaniels wants to do long term. Instead of prolonging it, let's move forward. The Broncos spent last offseason hiring a top-notch defensive coaching staff. This season, I expect them to focus on the offensive side.
That's Part 1 of my Knee-Jerk Reactions. Hammer away, and remember, MHR RADIO - TONIGHT at 9:30PM et / 7:30PM mt. BE THERE!
10 recs |
215 comments
|
Comments
The title is....
…hilarious…thanks for the smile. They’re hard to come by this morning.
- Nick
"We got 'em right where we want 'em!" - Keith Bishop, right before John Elway orchestrated The Drive. 'Nuff said.
just to replace st&no
why not make knee jerk reactions a new weekly feature?
by si_ice on Jan 4, 2010 1:21 PM MST via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
Alternate title
Knights Who Say Knee-Jerk

There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.
by underdog on Jan 4, 2010 1:22 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
In Dallas, they call it....
OVERREACTION MONDAY.
AHHHH, don't say that word.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Girl, you don't need to be a 10, as long as you have a good smile and smell like bacon.
by kentuckybronco on Jan 4, 2010 3:31 PM MST up reply actions
Tis merely a flesh wound says McDaniels
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
I think we can all agree
that Monty Python references are alway in vogue:)
Dear Rockies-Thank you for a wonderful rollercoaster season! Best turnaround in MLB history to become NL Wild Card Champs.
Garrett Atkins-So Long, Farewell, Auf weidersehen, Goodbye!! You were a great Rockie! GOOD LUCK!
Troy Tulowitzki-MLB's BEST shortstop..nuff said
Yorvit Torrealba- Re-sign!! he's en Fuego!!
Brad Hawpe- I hope I get to see you in a Rockies uniform again!
Dexter Fowler - prowling CF, WC in his talons, leaping Utleys in a single bound!
+1
-Harvey J. Neptune
"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi
My own knee-jerk
Until the Broncos figure out a way to draft impact players, things will not turn around. Ayers, Alphonso Smith, Quinn, someone tell me these guys were worth the picks we used on them. Certainly we did well in free agency last off-season, but it’s been awhile since we drafted more than one impact player in a draft.
by NoCalBroncoFan on Jan 4, 2010 12:37 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
Ayers, Smith, Moreno, Bruton and Quinn ALL had an impact this year
Ayers looked like what I hoped, he is a 2-4 sack OLB who can hold the point of attack and make the tackles that come to him.
Moreno looked solid as a RB which for a rookie behind what turned into a patchwork line was great. He improved steadily al season on blitz pickup and on route running. Both critical in this offense. I think he will become a very solid RB for a while and has a shot to become a Marshall Faulk on the top end.
Quinn is a BEAST as a blocker, when his technique is on. The issue he had was making mistakes, but on ST he made some nifty plays both blocking AND tackling all season. One more year of up and down then he should become very much a Daniel Graham type of TE. Like all receiving positions I like to give them 3 years to see what we have
Bruton and Smith…seriously, did you watch these guys? Both play smart and both play aggressive. I don’t expect either to turn into Brian Dawkins from 3 years ago or Troy Palamalu (sp) right now, but I DO see a TON of positives from both. And both are very much impact special teamers.
No, we did not draft a superstar who came in and lit the league on fire, BUT we drafted 5 guys who look like they play hard and are learning. If by some miracle one of our other picks who hung out on the practice squad work out 2009 could be an amazing draft that helps this team for 5-6 seasons.
I'll give you Bruton and Moreno - notice I didn't mention them.
Yes, the jury’s out on Smith and Ayers for a few more years, but I still have a problem with how high we drafted these guys.
by NoCalBroncoFan on Jan 4, 2010 1:29 PM MST up reply actions
the problem is with how "high" they were drafted
If they are the guys the team felt where the players they wanted, how does the draft position matter? Because they’re supposed to play up to their slot in the first season? How about just judging them on their rookie performances.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 1:45 PM MST up reply actions
in Quinns case
we traded up to get him. He had a 4th round grade on him and he even said himself he was surprised he was drafted in the spot he went.
I dont think people so much mind that these guys were drafted, but that we traded high picks to move up and grab these guys.
I still believe
he wouldve been available in round 4. What did we give up to get him? Our #3 from the Cutler trade?
Oh well. Its all water under the bridge now
we got a 4th round pick back
I don’t care where a player is drafted, only that he is productive (plus there were rumors of other teams were going to take him in the 3rd, but all of that is conjecture)
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
Would you say Quinn was productive?
I think thats highly objective..
And its all about value. You could draft a center 1st overall and pay him the top dollar that being drafted first overall demands, but if you know 31 other teams are going to pass on him why would you do that?
Why do you think the Raiders continually suck? They reach on players drafting them way before they should be going off the board? Look at they’re first two picks from this year.
by johnnystarr on Jan 4, 2010 3:23 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Yes, I think he was productive
Compared to other 3rd string TE’s/Special team players in the NFL
Ask me again in 2.5 years
I don’t give up on someone if they don’t have a productive rookie season – See Pryce, Trevor.
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
maybe what I'm trying to understand
is it all that important that we got the guy we wanted? I don’t quite get how some people can say, well we could’ve drafted him later and used that higher pick for X. Well, if you wanna play the what if game, what if player X was a bust, what if Quinn wasn’t available. What if’s can go on forever.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 2:25 PM MST up reply actions
IMO, where you draft a guy shouldn't matter
With the exception of top-10 picks in the first round (due to their prohibitive contract demands), I don’t care where you draft someone if he pans out in the end. I didn’t like the move of trading up to pick Jarvis Moss (primarily becuase I was excited by the idea of trading down with Cleveland for the sencond pick in the 2nd round and a #1 the next year), but if he had turned out to be the type of player he had the potential to be, who would’ve cared now? Marcus Thomas was regarded as a steal becuase he had top 15 talent and only dropped becuase of his pot smoking at Florida, but look how that’s worked out now.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 2:46 PM MST up reply actions
It does matter though.
That’s why scouting and the combine are such a big deal. Especially in the salary cap era.
- Nick
"We got 'em right where we want 'em!" - Keith Bishop, right before John Elway orchestrated The Drive. 'Nuff said.
I get the cap requirements
Important to take into consideration, but less so in the later rounds. We traded #79 & #84 for the #64 pick
pick 64 – Quinn:
4 year nearly $3 million contract, $930,000 signing bonus
pick -78 San Diego Louis Vasquez (#79 was undisclosed)
G 4 year $2.55 million contract, $800,000 signing bonus
A difference of 700k, but could you also argue that we saved money by not taking a player at #84 also which we might not have needed as much as depth at TE? Scheff had a history of injuries and with the new offense they got the best TE they evaluated.
Just as an aside I think way more money is wasted in FA than there is between draft picks in the 2nd-5th rounds. I’m much more ticked off we paid Keary Colbert this year than what we paid any of our draft picks.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:11 PM MST up reply actions
That's not the primary purpose of scouting
Scouting, IMO, should primarily be concerned with identifying the players that you want to draft. A secondary concern should be analyzing the actions and trends of other teams so that you can optimize your take on draft day. But if you sucessfully identify the players that you want to pick, you’re going to be all right at the end of the day – pulling off a draft-day coup is merely gravy.
the Cap is certainly important, but beyond the first round a sucessful rookie is generally going to be a steal for the first three years of his career no matter where he’s drafted- it’s the second contract of a player’s career in which he makes his money.
Sucessful teams (philly comes to mind) get signifigant contributions from their players while they’re still playing under their rookie salary cap. Then when free agency rolls around, they make decisions as to who they keep and hope to replace the guys they’ve lost in the draft.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 5, 2010 10:15 AM MST up reply actions
Opportunity cost
Over-drafting a player is a mistake no matter how well that player ends up performing.
Beyond the 1st round? Eh.
And really more like “beyond the top 10, Eh”
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
I think after the first round that opportunity is all evaulation
Either they are the player they think they wanted or they bust. You go get the players you want and go to work.There are so many greats that come in the 6th round and so many wash outs of 3rd choices that I don’t think “over-drafting” is worrisome.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 6:30 PM MST up reply actions
I can't believe I forgot him!
And I will give you the Jury being out, but Ayers was going to be drafted about where he was so that was a good pick and Smith could go either way, but he LOOKED like a talented rookie who played hard.
I just keep seeing Ayers running hard on every play against KC and more often than not he was at least doing his job the right way. That seems like what I saw all season. I think what will cause issues and potentially “bust” notations for Ayers is that he will never be a big sack guy. And with the way he plays he will probably be a 75-100 tackle guy in the long haul. Both things I can live with.
Couldn't agree more.
This is as solid and promising of a draft class as the Broncos have had in awhile. Whether any of them morph into superstars remains to be seen, but all evidence points to a collection of solid to good pros.
So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson
by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 4, 2010 2:05 PM MST up reply actions
This is not harsh
Regarding Brandon Marshall – Good Riddance. That’s harsh, I know,
Marshall totally quit on his teammates and coaches after they gave him more than a second chance. And actually, I have to question whether he has any teammates – he only plays for himself. Good riddance to him. Please, Coach McDaniels, get rid of this bum.
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
Yes
I wouldn’t just cut him. I expect the Broncos to explore trades, tenders and all that. Hopefully there’s enough of a market for the bum that more than one team is interested.
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
He's an RFA
Which means they will be able to get compensation from anyone who wants to sign him.
Now where did that Kool-Aid vendor go?
Thank goodness
Their is enough Dan Snyders, Al Davis’s, and Jerry Jones out their who will sign him. We need a 1st and 3rd for that guy
by johnnyurrotten on Jan 4, 2010 1:41 PM MST up reply actions
Regarding Turner and Dennison
I think they have their roots and are comfortable settled in Colorado…both have their kids here right? Could that be factor if Shanahan asks them to think it over and stay here?
Im not sure about it..heard it mentioned a couple of times I think…
Bleeding Orange & Blue in The Netherlands
Losing Turner or Dennison could have long term negative impacts
Both are synonymous with past successes in player development and scheme execution. I think they will be harder to replace than Marshall. If McX don’t want to keep those two top notch coaches, they better have their thinking caps on when looking for replacements. IMO, those two coaches have a better track record than either McDaniels or Xavier.
I agree, Larsen shouldnāt get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Jan 4, 2010 12:46 PM MST up reply actions
Yeah agreed
with McD likely to move away from zoneblocking though..losing Dennison would not be as bad as losing Turner in my opinion…
Bleeding Orange & Blue in The Netherlands
I'd love to see us keep Turner.
Dennison i could go either way on but Turner’s record speaks for itself.
Man is not a rational animal, he is a rationalizing animal.
by MrFNSunshine on Jan 4, 2010 12:54 PM MST up reply actions
I love them both, but
If the Broncos are going away from the system that tuner has made his living teaching, he might want to leave. Ditto Dennison – he’s been a great ZB teacher, and that’s not what I expected the Broncos to change when they kept Dennison and Turner. I suspect that shanahan and/or a few others will have a place for them.
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
I have to dissagree
Yes, Dennison and Turner are good, but since Gibbs left the team we have not seen the success that we had before. I think the change would be a benefit for our team in the long term as we do need an o-line coach who does not rely on zone blocking schemes and a RB coach who works well with them.
I wish I followed coaching staffs to that level, but I am confident we will find someone we can be happy about.
Not to live in the past, but last year's O-line did replicate past glories
and that was in spite of having 7 RBs placed on the IR.
Overall, I understand your concern with the new scheme. We might be just as successful with a different O-line coach that has a refined understanding of what is needed for the new offense.
I agree, Larsen shouldnāt get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Jan 4, 2010 1:21 PM MST up reply actions
have not seen success?
what do you say about selvin young? un drafted back running for huge yards. what do you call 2008? one back after another going injured and us still having good average per run.
by si_ice on Jan 4, 2010 1:51 PM MST via mobile up reply actions
Success = consitent winning
I have not seen this for a while. Have you? And losing a home AFC Championship game when a HUGE part of the problem was the o-line is not success.
And yes we did turn a bunch of running backs into stars, but I think that was more a factor of being able to beat the heck out of some teams early then falling apart later. Looking back on the “successful” seasons by RB how many led to success by the team?
I'm thinking of a name from last year....
…..a running back whose run of great games coincided with the team looking great….
- Nick
"We got 'em right where we want 'em!" - Keith Bishop, right before John Elway orchestrated The Drive. 'Nuff said.
I hate to say it, but I hope so.
If he’s not going to be allowed to play here, I’d like to see him land with Shanny…..
- Nick
"We got 'em right where we want 'em!" - Keith Bishop, right before John Elway orchestrated The Drive. 'Nuff said.
Silly logic
Unless the O-line fills all 53 roster spots then determining their success (or lack of success) based upon team winning percentage is silly.
It is like using won-loss record as a primary factor in determining how a pitcher performed in a given year.
Good point
I think the issue I have is that at times our o-line was a negative in the past because the running system and pass blocking tended to be somewhat vanilla. Later in the season we would see issues as teams had video and adjusted to what we did then we would not be able to change.
This was PART of the problem and did lead to losses later in the season. Other parts of the problem did not help, but I do not feel that Dennison and Turner are so good that there loss will be a major negative.
So when can we expect the axe to drop on the guys it needs to drop on?
Any time now or after the Superbowl?
Man is not a rational animal, he is a rationalizing animal.
I'd say after the super bowl....
but im not sure when it happened last year..believe it was just before free agency started? hmm… im gonna have to look that up…
Im sure the next few weeks McD/Xanders will be evaluating everything that went down this season first…
Bleeding Orange & Blue in The Netherlands
Well, Shanny got the Axe in december 2008 on the 30th, I think.
For a month or so, we were finding a new coach instead of getting rid of players. McDaniels was getting rid of players a little bit after he was hired.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Girl, you don't need to be a 10, as long as you have a good smile and smell like bacon.
by kentuckybronco on Jan 4, 2010 3:35 PM MST up reply actions
Shanny used to axe people the next day, as I recall
Sort of ironic that he was also canned so quickly after the season.
But when you consider what an advantage it is to make moves while other teams are in the post season, it’s a smart move.
I’m guessing those that will be cut will be cut quickly and those that will be traded may not be until closer to the draft.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:38 PM MST up reply actions
I agree
I agree with all your assessments. Although I had hoped the hybrid offensive scheme would work better, I do expect McD to make some changes here. But I think Casey will be kept for one more year while they draft his replacement. As for Brandon, what a disappointment! I thought he got his act together but its clear he only plays for Brandon.
I really appreciated Orton this year and compared to Cutlers scenario in Chicago, It was better then expected. But Denver really needs to start grooming another QB and I hope thats Brandstater or someone else. I don’t think Orton will ever be the QB that can stretch the field. He can throw deep but only if the play is called. He doesn’t seem to see the open receivers down the field very well and thats my biggest complaint. Also, he can’t throw a screen pass and hit the runner in stride to save his life.
Wegman for 1 more year?
He looked worn down as the season went on. I agree we would like to have a replacement ready and do not, but unless we can find a couple of above average guards in free agency I think we may be stuck rather than choosing to keep him.
If we get Harris back
and draft Iupati, it would make life a lot easier for Casey.
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
by bradley on Jan 4, 2010 1:15 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
If Weigmann's age has caught up with him
he might be noticeably worse next year. I’m wondering if Hamilton might be able to give us a decent year at center while we’re developing one, if we don’t pick up somebody in F.A. If it worked that would leave left guard only as a trouble spot. We need more depth on the line. If we’d still had Pears we might not have had as steep a drop-off at right tackle as we did when Harris went down.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
Wow, Finally people are starting to see BM for who he is
After his preseason stunt I lost any faith I had in the dude to actually step up and be accountable. Glad to see the the the blinders are starting to come off peoples eyes.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
mea culpa
You certainly get one from me, B-man. Sometimes, being an optimist can be more miserable than being clear-eyed. I really thought he and McDaniels had some magic going.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 1:23 PM MST up reply actions
I was one who held out hope in Marshall
…agains my better wisdom! for a while there it looked like they might be able to work it out.
but at this point, all will be better off with some sort of a trade.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 2:03 PM MST up reply actions
Broncoman you were right
about his attitude but you were wrong about his on the field talent. He is a top 3 WR in the league talent wise when he turns it on. He has HOF talent. Its too bad the does not have the mental side
by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 4, 2010 4:02 PM MST up reply actions
while he has struggled in the past
I can’t really characterize his latest moves as stupid, more like calculated. He really is doing what is best for himself, considered in a vaccuum, if you assume he has no interest in being a Bronco next year.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:40 PM MST up reply actions
This is very true. And this is why teams will be willing to part with 1st and 3rd round pick for the guy.
He proved a lot this season. Got past his legal issues (none pending anyway) and doesn’t have a injury (major hip surgery) hanging over his head.
A team like the Dophins would become instant contenders if they landed Marshall at the cost of someone like Donovan Warren (2010 1st round pick) and a third rounder.
We we lose Marshall, we’ll be instantly worse by quite a bit. But what can we do at this point. Hopefully we do better with the draft picks than we did in 2009.
lots of things we need to do better this offseason
Hope the HC follows through on his comment that the coaching staff is going to cast a critical eye and try to correct their mistakes from last spring and summer.
I want to believe in McDaniels as I think he’s a good person and a student of the game, but he has to show us more than the usual coaching platitudes. Putting this disappointing season under the microscope and getting three more wins and a division title next year would be a good start.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 5, 2010 12:19 AM MST up reply actions
Excellent Knee Jerk
As usual, well thought out knee jerks! In particular upgrading the offensive line (and it was offensive in the last 10 games) is a big key to improving the team.
Always have been and always will be…a Broncos fan!
Being Positive
John, I like the way you think, although I heartily disagree with you on the direction of the Broncos in 2009.
Still, I think the best way for all of us to move forward in 2010 is to be positive about the future and encourage the team to do some of the right things.
I will give McDaniels credit for improving the defensive secondary. I hope he can hold it together.
I will also give McDaniels credit for bringing a short passing game to Denver.
I will give Shanahan credit for seeing that Elam had a short shelf life remaining and sticking with Prater.
On the coaching front, I hope that McDaniels turns over the play-calling to someone else and concentrates on being a head coach. I think good things could come from that. I hope that the Broncos are less impulsive in the 2010 draft and don’t reach for players as much as what happened during Round 2 last draft.
by Baltimore Bronco on Jan 4, 2010 12:58 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
I also agree with Dennison leaving, not so sure about Turner
But I am not sure if you can blame Dennison for not being able to teach a system, the fact is the lineman we have in the interior are not very well suited for a power trap game and having them play them switch between that and a zone scheme probably is the bigger issue. I think Dennison has shown he is a good coach in that the units he have coached have generally excelled, it really comes down to is it an effective scheme for the personnel you have.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
Dennison and Turner
Neither will leave unless they are fired, IMO. Both have been here a long time. Dennison played collegiately at Colorado State, then for the Broncos. I’m not as knowledgeable about Turners’s history, but he’s been with the Broncos a long time, and he’s not a kid. I doubt he’d want to pull up stakes.
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
What to do with Marshall.
I can’t imagine Bowlen signing a large check to keep Marshall. If it were my money, I wouldn’t sign it either.
Marshall is out best player, but I remember Gerard Warren well ā and he may well have been our best player in 2005. Once Warren got paid that offseason, he became a lazy shadow of himself. I have no idea how Marshall will react to getting paid ā and he will get paid a ####load of money, but there is certainly a Gerard Warren type of risk with him. And that could kill our cap position for years. Too much risk.
If a 1st and 3rd round pick is the best we can do…. it must be done. And mind you, I think Marshall is worth well more than 1st and 3rd round pick for what he does on the field. If no team signs him, I say we keep him around another year for 100 catches at what is roughly the same salary he made this year. That would really piss him off. It’s a great ROI, even with the headaches. Either way, he is not long for Denver.
Fun Thought
Marshall playing for peanuts next season – but like the elephant, he’d make a heck of a mess on the locker room floor…
Moreno/Buckhalter in '09
LOL
That’s the problem – the mess Marshall made on the floor. I can’t help but think that his value to any team in the NFL went way down after the bs he pulled last week.
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
The great thing about it is...
It probably hasn’t reduced his value that much. Sure, teams know that the Broncos are now motivated sellers and will bargain accordingly. but as for the attitude vs. production issue – 100+ catches has a way of seducing NFL teams like a siren’s call lures a ship astray.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 2:07 PM MST up reply actions
Teams knew we were motivated sellers with Cutler..
And we made quite a haul there. Whether we’re motivated sellers or not there is still competition between the teams who would want his services. I don’t think the seller being motivated really matters when you’re talking about a product that’s in low supply and high demand.
Marshall
Denver would never get a 1st and a 3rd for Marshall. Just because the CBA calls for that compensation teams routinely trade far lesser to acquire the player.
Remember, its in both teams interest to move on that particular player. Denver doesnt want to pay Marshall 8-10 million and the team acquiring him isnt going to give up that much compensation when they can use 1 of their draft picks to draft a receiver..
by johnnystarr on Jan 4, 2010 2:20 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
He's a RFA
Meaning he can take on offers from other teams and if the Broncos refuse to match the best offer, we get a 1st and a 3rd round pick from the aquiring team. Someone will be willing to part with a 1st and a 3rd for a talent like Marshall and I don’t see the Broncos wanting to match the contract offer.
The only way we don’t get a 1st and a 3rd for BMarsh is if we trade him to somebody for more than a 1st and a 3rd, which is unlikely since teams know they can get him for just that, a 1st and a 3rd.
Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein
Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein
I understand that..
But that doesnt mean a team is going to give up that much for him.. Think when is the last time a team actually paid that out.. Off hand I can’t think of 1 time.. Even Jared Allen was traded for 2 2nd round picks..
FOr the same reason that every fan is down on Denver I doubt someone tries to trade that much for him.Not to mention that receivers have a terrible history after they have been trading of not panning out… Housyamama, Deon Branch, Roy Williams, Braylon Edwards, Javon Walker, etc etc,
Trust me, I hope Denver suckers some team into giving that much up. I doubt we get much more then a 2nd for him.
Yep
Wrangling a 2 out of Marshall would probably be a coup at this point. Its a buyer’s market considering the details.
So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson
by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 4, 2010 3:44 PM MST up reply actions
That is wrong. Denver has the leverage and it’s always a seller’s market when talking about a franchise WR that is 25 years old. If TO can get signed again and again, BM will be very attractive to several desperate owners.
TO
was cut by Philly and Dallas, so Dallas and Buffalo didn’t have to give up any draft picks or players for him. I also don’t think Philly had to give up anything for him – did San Francisco cut him also?
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
Did you see the contracts TO was signed too? Absurd amounts of money. So a new deal for Marshall for untold millions won’t scare teams – not even a little bit. That is my point on TO and Marshall. A new contract from other teams is not the issue. There will be plenty of money thrown his way.
For value – look at Roy Williams of Detroit to Dallas trade fame. Marshall’s situation as a RFA is much more akin to Roy Williams than an UFA like TO. Roy was traded for a 1st, 3rd and 6th rounder. Marshall is clearly a much better player. Both are headaches for their teams ā Marshall much more so.
As long as there is no new CBA, Denver still holds ALL the cards with Marshall – including my favorite one, which is to assign a 1st and 3rd round tender at something like $2.8MM per year. I think several teams would immediately try to sign him. However, if Iām wrong, then he stays in Denver on the cheap yet again. Win win for Denver. Win lose for Marshall. Itās easy math.
I honestly hope you are right.
So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson
by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 4, 2010 6:18 PM MST up reply actions
I think that Marshall has the talent
that someone would give up a 1st and a 3rd for. We’ll soon find out.
Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein
Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein
Dude… What the hell are you talking about?
Jared Allen was traded for a mid 1st round pick and TWO 3rd rounders.
Roy Williams was traded for a 1st, 3rd and 6th round pick.
yep... you're right
I apologize… In all fairness though, Detroit fleeced Jerry Jones… Jerry had a man crush on Roy Williams from his college days… Even after the trade they were talking about how great of a trade it was for Detroit ( I live near DEtroit)
Another Jared Allen?
I am not sure if there are 2 Jared Allens, but the one we all know got traded for one 1st roud pick (Branden Albert) two 3rd round picks and a bag of candy.
Has GW been playing well for Oakland, or is that only when they play against us?
Seems like his game has been there since he was shipped out, at least against us (which is I guess to be expected).
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:42 PM MST up reply actions
Good post, John
I’m in agreement with you and would just add a couple things.
1) Orton I’m not sold on Orton, BUT there are simply no other options and may not be a bad thing. I know, strong endorsement, but hear me out. It’s clear Orton needs time to throw. He simply cannot make plays when he’s hassled, the 3 yd bloop to Lloyd yesterday is a prime example, he couldn’t even make that play on the run. He knows the system now. If the Broncos strengthen the interior line, which is much easier to do than finding good tackles, Orton should be able to have some real success. Bringing in another veteran means another season of assimilation at the most important position which I think McD will NOT want to go through, and a rookie would be the same thing or worse. Keep Orton and groom Brandstater or rookie.
2) Interior O line This HAS to be the number 1 priority this offseason. The pass-protection issues I noted already, and you hit on the Knowshon stuff. To me, the jury is out on him still. How well can he do behind a solid O line? I completely agree with you about the tackles and it bums me out to see Hamilton go down so fast. Plus, Wiegman got old fast. I don’t know how many times I saw him yesterday alone standing in the backfield after a play as the pile was unfolding at the line of scrimmage. He was blown so far back at the point of attack that he didn’t even make it into the scrum. Lame.
3) Marshall How much does this remind you of Anthony Miller when Shanny took over? It’s the same thing: prima-donna receiver who’s me-first. It’ll be the same result too except this time, the Broncos should be handsomely compensated for him. After watching Gaffney yesterday, I’m convinced he can be the possession receiver they need in this offense in place of Marshall. Try to work Eddie in to that Wes Welker role and get a long-ball type receiver this reloading season.
4 Defense The defense looked exposed the last half of the season. I don’t know exactly what the issue was, but I think they need a true beast in the middle. They just consistently got gashed up the middle in the run game. They look decent at setting the edge and not allowing the RB to get outside (obviously, Charles was getting them yesterday, but he’ll do that to just about every defense with his speed and is not a good gauge). It looks similar this year to last year, beef up the middle, bot on the line and at LB.
As much as it sucks that the season is over, in general, I don’t have as much of a “cupboard is bare” feel as I did after last season. It IS surprising to me though that the issues are offensive line related to me. I thought that was THE strength before this season. Should be another fun reloading season, nevertheless.
Now where did that Kool-Aid vendor go?
by pubkeeper on Jan 4, 2010 1:12 PM MST reply actions 2 recs
Didn't Phillips have Miller for one year?
But, yeah, that is a PERFECT example!
Shanahan got some criticism for letting him go and bringing in the likes of Ed McCaffrey, remember?
Now where did that Kool-Aid vendor go?
Yah, and then where did Miller end up after that?
One more year with the Cowboys and then done.
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.
It was Phillips that got him, you're correct
Shanahan booted him and brought in some slow white guy named Ed. ;)
by AllBroncsallday on Jan 4, 2010 1:58 PM MST up reply actions
Yeah, if I remember correctly,
Tim Brown was the main target in the offseason until the Raiders nixxed that. Miller was nothing more than a consolation prize.
you are correct.
I hadn’t thought about that in quite a while. I remember being pretty PO’d that we’d go after a former Raider.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 9:14 PM MST up reply actions
all the 3 and outs
took a toll on the defense, IMO, both in terms of stamina as games went on and also opportunities to solve Denver’s defense’s scheme.
You know...
Brandon Lloyd looked good too. He made a couple of spectacular catches, but then again, I recall him being known for that and he drops all the easy ones.
Still, I hope we keep that guy around too.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
He screams 3rd/4th WR
Maybe a nice inexpensive 2 yr deal? 2 mil/yr with a 2 mil bonus?
He has speed too...
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
his knock is that he's soft going over the middle
though I haven’t seen that yet.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:15 PM MST up reply actions
Gaffney
So a good game against the Chiefs is all it takes to convince you of someones ability?
The fact that Gaffney has been judged by the league and Mcdaniels as being not nearly as good as Marshall doesn’t deter you at all? At least we can replace one of the best players in the league easily if we just follow your plan. How many good long-ball type recievers do you think we can get hold of?
draft
i would look to make sure we have the best available people to research players for draftibility. seems like we had a lot of misses this year. same goes for signing free agents.
That's funny because I feel like we had an excellent FA period last year
and I thought we had a pretty good draft as well. I don’t think our issues lie in our scouting department.
Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein
Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein
are you watching the redskins or the broncos
Same goes for signing free agents? I thought we rocked the FA market last year. In terms of value and talent we brought in. Too early on the draft picks, but they’re sill playing for us unlike FA like Koutouvides, Manuel of 2008, draft picks Torain and Jack Williams of ’08 as well.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:18 PM MST up reply actions
Slightly off topic but Doom apologizes to fans
(And this just makes me sad because Dumervil was one of the true highlights of this up and down season)
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.
Pure Class
What a contrast in a thread at least a bit devoted to Marshall. Did Brandon think to apologize for not showing up this week?
Now where did that Kool-Aid vendor go?
Brrrrr!!!!
I agree, Larsen shouldnāt get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Jan 4, 2010 1:31 PM MST up reply actions
his tongue pulled up lame
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:43 PM MST up reply actions
What was the MRI result?
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
RE SIGN THIS PLAYER
Don’t care what he wants, pay it.
He's got to be our #1 priority.
You just don’t find pass-rushers like that. At the beginning of the season I was cautiously optimistic about hims – his athleticism and speed seemed like a good match for a 3-4 (or 5-2) OLB but I wasn’t sure how he’d make the transition. needless to say, he exceeded expectations by a pretty wide margin.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 2:12 PM MST up reply actions
Now, THIS is the guy
That should get the big check. Class all the way Doom- love it!
by AllBroncsallday on Jan 4, 2010 2:01 PM MST up reply actions
The wonderful Mr. Reid sent a message via twitter
He said he loved this city, this team, these fans and never wants to ever leave. It was quite awesome and touching.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 2:33 PM MST up reply actions
I've been happily surpised by Reid.
During training camp I posted some doubts about the members of the front 7 that I hadn’t heard much about – Reid, Haggan, Mcbean, etc. In retrospect I was a bit premature with my concerns. Reid has seemed to be a really energetic player.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 2:53 PM MST up reply actions
I think Reid and Haggan deserve a lot of love
for quietly doing a great job, with class and hard work no matter if it was ST or what defensive package they were placed in.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:19 PM MST up reply actions
+1
Love the guy
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:44 PM MST up reply actions
100% class
what a great guy, we have to get him re-signed.
"Really, I'm a high-motor guy. Tough, hard-nosed, a hard runner, can make you miss at times. And just competitive. I love to play the game and I bring that energy to my team. So, we'll see how that goes." - Knowshon Moreno
Knowshon Moreno=ROY
You got a big ole rec from me John.
I’ve been waiting for you to come out and have some passion about your opinion. I know usually that is reserved for the radio show, but that has been absent as of late also.
I agree with every one of your points, though I will add that I’d like to see a QB upgrade in the next few years. Kyle Orton drives me as crazy as Jake Plummer used too…and Jay Cutler. Cutler really drove me crazy, but I’d like to find the next Tom Brady please. Is that too much to ask?!?! lol
Looking forward to part 2…after all, I’m close to “checking out” for the next two months until the draft run up gets going. I hate watching Bronco-less playoffs.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
Visions of Grandeur...
That 6-0 start had me pretty giddy. Oh well. Here’s to an interesting off-season.
Go Broncos!
I had delusions of grandeur. lol
We all did.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
Some guy named Zappa said last August or so
that he’d count an 8-8 season as an improvement, because of all the changes (if I recall correctly).
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
I didn't say our team isn't better...
but starting 6-0 began my delusions of grandeur. I remember believing 8-8 was an improvement…still, after that 6-0 start I am hugely disappointed we couldn’t win half of our remaining 10 games.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
Yeah, I know
I just remembered your comment from last summer, and thought I’d toss it out there. I remember thinking at the time that it was very sensible, and I also remember getting a little premonition that 8-8 would be it. Anyway, I do think the Broncos are better after an 8-8 2009 than after an 8-8 2008.
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
I hope now I'm just having delusions of failure.
; )
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:44 PM MST up reply actions
You're probably right about most of this
though I can’t help but feel it would be a shame for Turner to leave. He’s considered one of the great RB coaches, and has worked magic with so many different backs over the years. And they seem to like him. I don’t know, I’m sure you’re right the system probably needs a change there too, to move on, but I’d hate to see him go.
Dennison will probably bolt and it won’t bum me out too much.
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.
Interior line acquisitions...
on both sides of the ball is my solution.
If resources are finite, keep the skill players one more year (minus Marshall) and beef up the beef.
really appreciate your take on Scheffler, specifically
Your tone was perfect on that point. It is too bad he was lumped in with B Marsh. Can’t excuse what he said, but I’d be crazy if I said I never felt the way he did when I was in a situation where my skills weren’t being utilized. I wish him the best of luck — hopefully traded to the NFC, not cut to be picked up by the Raiders or Chefs.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
And I feel that way about a lot of the Shanahan carryovers that don't fit
Hope McD puts Shanny on his speed dial. I’d love to see them playing for Mike again in 2010.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 1:26 PM MST up reply actions
I feel the same way, I appreciate their contributions and I always like to see ex-Broncos do well
The few exceptions are the “me first” slackers. Good riddance to them.
I agree, Larsen shouldnāt get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Jan 4, 2010 1:30 PM MST up reply actions
That would be awesome for Scheffler
I always liked him and I think he plays hard. Plus him and Cooley on the same team would be priceless!
Oh, and I hope Marshall signs with Oakland
Seriously, stop laughing, think about watching Champ abuse him for a couple years.
If it was in oakland, no.
perfect example: Randy Moss
"Really, I'm a high-motor guy. Tough, hard-nosed, a hard runner, can make you miss at times. And just competitive. I love to play the game and I bring that energy to my team. So, we'll see how that goes." - Knowshon Moreno
Knowshon Moreno=ROY
I don't think BMarsh's 40 time is fast enough for Al to sign him.
Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein
Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein
but wouldn't his rap sheet make up for that slower time?
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:20 PM MST up reply actions 2 recs
Synonym - Function: noun
one of two or more words or expressions of the same language that have the same or nearly the same meaning in some or all senses.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:38 PM MST up reply actions
lmao! here’s to Al! just rec’d, baby!
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:46 PM MST up reply actions
Offseason dreaming
This is an “if we could” hope for the offseason
Get Healthy! – Royal and Harris both need to come back 100% for our offense to really click. I am starting to worry that Harris may be injury prone
Re-sign Orton – Stability at the QB position would be great, and Orton is a very solid NFL QB who is only 26 right now. Anyone have an issue with 5 years and about 30-35 mil?
Re-sign DOOM – don’t care what it costs, just sing him. Does he want 45 million over 6 years, done, don’t care
Sign the following in Free Agency
Beefy DE, depth signing here
Solid WR to go with Royal and Gaffney
A freaking punter
A starting OG
A couple backup Linemen. One would be great, but two would be even better
Draft whoever is the most talented player that fits our system when it is our turn to draft. Don’t care if that is a RB, Offensive Tackle, Defensive back, or whatever
I am looking forward to the list of available free agents more than anything else. That is where I think we will do the most good for this team in the short term.
good stuff, john.
can’t disagree with anything there, really. i’m pretty much with everyone who sees orton as the qb going into 2010 as well. i’d like the broncs to start grooming a replacement and i do think, depending on how the youngster(s) is (are) doing, orton might be on a short leash as early as next year.
my knee jerk reaction to mcdaniels is just that i hope he matures in working with personnel. i’m sure i’ll get disagreement galore here, but i think it’s his weak point. he’s young and he’ll get a lot better at this but i’m not sure to what extent he gets that you’re never going to nail down a team of 40 men with stellar character. i’m sure he knows that on paper but in real life situations i’m not sure he’s there yet.
bring on part 2! rec’d.
Yep, a Quiet Speedboat
I agree oxmouth, that McDaniels needs to acquire some skills regarding listening and working with those players who are not choir boys. It takes all kinds of skills and players to make a team, not people cut out of the same mold. “Team” involves not just singularity of purpose, but a mixture of a very diverse group of players. There were a lot of players with skills on the Broncos when McDaniels arrived. He needs to make players feel that he will have their back when it comes to criticism. Going public very seldom works.
by Baltimore Bronco on Jan 4, 2010 1:53 PM MST up reply actions
don't know if it's a "choir boy" issue
as much as a team issue. I do wonder if he was giving the talented Mr. Marshal the pass up until the other members of the team came in and said WTF. I think I’d take more issue if he was giving Marshal the pass and let it get to the point where other members had to step up.
Going public has been the only way it had worked for Brandon in the past. Brandon is acutely aware to his public persona which is why he raced to ESPN to give an interview after the training camp issue. Did he appologize to the team first? Nope, he went to ESPN and proceeded to say it was blown out of proportion. Talented, but living up to his baby TO moniker.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 2:30 PM MST up reply actions
part of me did wonder
if McDaniels took this to the press because he’s tired of players doing it first.
But then I thought, I don’t know and I don’t care. I think he should have had the integrity to keep it between he and the team. Rook mistake.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:49 PM MST up reply actions
I think the Leach / Paxton situation was a mistake
And I hope he learns from it. even if he genuinely felt that Paxton was a better player (and I have nothing against Paxton), I think he should have held off on the move if only for the sake of morale among the existing “Shanahan” guys.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 2:16 PM MST up reply actions
Paxton isn'ta very good example.
Leach’s contract was going to be up sooner than later, and Paxton was a free agent now. Rather than wait, and end up in a market where they may or may not have been able to resign Leach, who was looking like the best LS free agent of his class, they took Paxton pre-emptively, easily the best LS free agent of HIS class. That he was better (even if it only seems slightly) was just icing on the cake.
The got that position set and taken care of, and outside of injury or accident, the position will not be a concern throughout this rebuilding phase. If all goes relatively well, by the time we have to address LS again, it will be when we don’t have needs all over the team, and can afford to seriously address a relative luxury….
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
"That's MR.Styg..."
by Jeremy Bolander on Jan 4, 2010 10:02 PM MST up reply actions
That makes sense, now I finally understand the Leach/Paxton decision
I agree, Larsen shouldnāt get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.
by Arctic Bronco on Jan 5, 2010 7:33 PM MST up reply actions
Agreed in part
But McDaniels has been part of NFL teams for years. I’m sure he understands that, in ‘real life situations,’ rosters are never perfect….
- Nick
"We got 'em right where we want 'em!" - Keith Bishop, right before John Elway orchestrated The Drive. 'Nuff said.
How about a real OC
Shanahan could not handles GM and HC and gave the OC job to Bates whereas he should have kept on calling the plays and hired a real GM.
McDaniels, the HC, could call (suggest) plays but may be better served having a real OC to work with Orton on the sideline so that he can keep track of His Defense. I wonder how much input Coach gives Nolan during the game or if Nolan is left to his own devices? Two heads on offense and defense would be better than one.
broncorat
"Our word for the week has been accountability...and anyone that showed any indifference to that, weāll play without them, and weāll play well anyway."
-1,000,000,000,000,000
-Richee
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
by BroncoSense72 on Jan 4, 2010 4:32 PM MST up reply actions
Harsh
I did intend it tongue in cheek, but wow.
Oh...OK...I'll take back a couple of those zeros
-Richee
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
by BroncoSense72 on Jan 5, 2010 9:08 AM MST up reply actions
One observation on Turner
He has been one of the premier RB coaches for seemingly forever, and has made stars out of everything from cell phone salesmen to Marines. On the surface, this is the last guy on staff to replace. That said, Turner has coached his backs almost exclusively in a zone-blocking scheme for nearly two decades. Much has been made out of our O-line’s inability to make the transition into a power-run scheme. I wonder if the same could be said for Turner? Would he continue to have the streak of success he has had if required by McD to change his own coaching philosophy to something he has not used for at least 15 years (if at all)?
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted and then used against you.
I had a dream last night....
the Broncos signed Lechler. Can you imagine him in MH for 8 games?
If I had a dream like that I wouldn't want to wake up.
I’ve been a punting fan even since the days of Mike Horan (best punter in Broncos history BTW), and I’d love to see some decent punting around here. I really whis they had kept Kern, although I can understand the decision given his inconsistency.
That said, while we’re on the subject of kicking, isn’t is nice to see the Broncos line up for a 40-yard feild goal without your stomach tying itself in knots? The patience Shanahan and McDaniels showed to Prater really seems to have paid off.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 2:20 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Is Lechler a free agent?
Maybe you’re dream can come true! But he’s very expensive as punters go and Broncos have other needs to spread their money around.
That said I think bringing back Britton Colquitt is smart and while someone to compete with him would be a good idea I think they may be in better shape next year there.
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.
He signed a 4 year, 16 mil contract in the offseason
And he’s a steal even at 4 mil / year – there have been times when he’s been Oaklands best player!
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 2:50 PM MST up reply actions
$44,500 per punt
according to my quick math estimate. nice. i bet he hears cash register bells every time he hits the ball. parents, let your children grow up to be punters.
Ah that's right
it was last off season that I, too, was dreaming of Lechler. ;-) But yeah I’d rather my team’s best player not be the punter. And I do think Denver will be better in that dept. next year. (They already improved somewhat in the last few games.)
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.
Janikowski
is a great kicker and I’d value him more then Lechler
Janikowski
is, I believe, a free agent. But let’s stick with Prater.
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
Nope....
Janikowski’s had off-field troubles and I’m not sold on his consistency. Prater ended up, 30 of 35? not shabby in my book…I’ll keep the youngun
I'll stick with Prater.
I just wonder how Kern would have turned out had we shown him the same patience we showed Prater. He was kinda in the same boat as Prater last year – great leg, not so great consistency. I haven’t had a chance to look up his stats with Tennesee this year, maybe I’ll make a fanpost about it tommorow if work’s not too busy.
Belief is accepting something because youāve been convinced to do so, whether you like it or not. Faith is accepting something because you want to accept it.
by Hercules Rockefeller on Jan 4, 2010 9:11 PM MST up reply actions
Live press conference with McD
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants country, and damned proud of it.
I know some of us were calling for the head of Priefer earlier in the season
How do y’all feel about him now? Apparently April from the Bills got fired along with the rest of their staff, he might be a nice coup
by RockyMountainHigh on Jan 4, 2010 3:00 PM MST reply actions
I can say that I no longer cringe on kickoffs
and punt returns because of our coverage unit’s season long improvement.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:22 PM MST up reply actions
From what I have seen of Orton with the Bears last year, Orton can throw accurate 20+yards passes, in fact after the Carolina game last year, Orton start throwing an average of 7 or 8 20+ yards passes a game and he play well with the Bears before his ankle injury. Orton had a decent running game last year and he and Forte complement each other well before Orton’s ankle injury.
As for Lloyd, he play well but the problem with him is that he play well when his mind is on teh football game. However, Lloyd is aspiring to be a “rap” star and at times he would have problem concetrating and he also don’t like to play hurt, that is why he was bench after his injury last year.
If possible, I would like the Broncos to try and get Toub, the special team coach from the Bears. Toub is one of the best Sp coach out there and the Bears as an organization don’t like to pay the assitant coaches well so offering Toub more money might be enough to lure him away from the Bears.
One of my worries with Orton...
is his ankles. He had an ankle injury in ’08, and it ruined his season. ’09, he injures the same thing. He needs to get those suckers taped WELL before every game.
Toub would be a great addition!
The Broncos have some pretty good ST talent and he could groom them beautifully (ref: Hester Knox and Maynard)
Orton is a good, that is for sure, but the ankle thing bothers me too. I loved watching him at Purdue and then when he went to my Chicago Bears. Funny he gets traded to my AFC team…
Lloyd is such an oddity that I dont know what to say haha…he can make the most amazing catches in the game…and he will miss the easy one needed to keep a drive going.
Thanks John, to the heart of the matter,
As bad as it all seems, their is an Orange & Blue lining.
As many above have stated (including you) were better than in years past.
Real Power, comes with the realization that One cannot change the Moment;
only ones perception of it: Atitude! JQM
No knee-jerk here and I agree with you 100% John. Brandon Marshall is not an ELITE WR, note Jeremy Bolanders post.
Refarding Marshall as elite he is compiling stats right now, but there are two standard traits that most game changing WRs have, that he either doesnāt have, or doesnāt have, YET.
Firstly, he doesnāt have multiple gears in the speed department. Hard to stretch teh field with him, as he canāt help you in a bomb-when-they-blitz type of scenario. You can still get a completion to him in that scenario, it just doesnāt force a drastic gameplan switch by a defense, something that speedsters can force. This is generally offset by his better than average YAC ability, and the risk associated with a long pass is similar to the risk associated with lost yards due to lateral or backwards running when he goes after YAC. My thoughts on this aspect of his game is that it is a pretty much equal exchange, since the long threat could potentially be another players job: there is nothing that says that Marshall needs to do that in addition to being a YAC guy. Additionally, it is a terrific fit for a short passing game styled offense like McDās, so I think he is also a great offensive fit. One of my hopes for his development is that he would abandon the side to side part of his YACing, and just get downfield like Hines Ward. There would be fewer stunning gamebreakers ala Dallas this year, but there would be fewer losses of yards. Ward consistently gains yards, and occasionally breaks them, by being a hard to bring down WR (though there are some differences in style). BM should aim for that kind of productivity, it will help his career and his team out in the long run.
The second part of his game, which he hasnāt mastered, is going after the ball. The greats, the elite guys, the guys who donāt get traded from team to team, they know how to attack the ball consistently. there have been pure catchers like Chris Carter and Randy Moss, but guys like Vincent Jackson, Fitzgerald, Andre Johnson, these guys ATTACK the ball when it is near them. Javon Walker had this kind of ability, but a frail body and mind. This is a combination of body control, athleticism and focus all coming to bear at the same time. BMarsh can do any of the three at any given time. he can cobble together two out of three conswistently, but getting all three together is something he canāt do YET, with consistency. As long as he doesnāt hit some kind of stretch of trouble where he is benched or suspended or just generally not starting, he will continue to develop, and will eventually be able to put all three components together consistently. I wouldnāt bet against it taking more than next year to reach that level, but regression or attrition is possible. We will have the franchise tag available in a year if we want to go down that road.
In the interim, he would not be difficult to replace, in terms of roster stability, but we donāt have enough ammo to go around. I think we would need to net two good picks, like maybe a 2nd and a 4th. I donāt remember what the RFA tenders are, but I believe the $1mil a year mark is a 2nd rounder, which might be our max for most of our RFAs this offseason. That is basically an exchange, and is not good enough, so preemptively seeking out a more expensive trade could be in the cards. Otherwise we may look at having to really up the ante with his RFA deal. If they are willing to push the RFA deal up into a high, or multiple picks category, then there is no need to trade him preemptively. you either get the necessary depth to replace him, or you keep him.
The gutsy call of our head coach should have been made when he benched in the 2nd or 3rd game. Gaffney and Lloyd proved yesterday that Kyle can throw the long ball and they got open or got into a situation where they had a chance to catch the ball. Brandon hasn’t showed that ability as much. I’ll take a Lloyd any day, trade Marshall for the moon and then some. There are teams out here right now drooling all over their keyboards trying to make a trade. We’ll get value out of the 4th rounder for sure or my name isn’t Clamcadiddle-Hopper.
by bfree2bronc on Jan 4, 2010 4:08 PM MST reply actions 2 recs
There is no way we trade
a talent like Bmarsh for less then a 1st and 3rd. The highest RFA tender is a 1st and a 3rd and that is what he will get. I think he is worth more then a 1st and a 3rd. We should get like a 1st, 2nd and 4th for the guy. I completely disagree that he is not Elite. He has a ton of talent but he does not fit your personal thoughts on what a elite WR is.
by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 4, 2010 4:17 PM MST up reply actions
Disagree
We need to trade him for the best offer we get. The guy QUIT on his teammates.
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
Disagree with what
his value in picks. I am saying what he is worth. we will probably not get that because of his off the field issues
by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 4, 2010 4:29 PM MST up reply actions
So
do we trade him for the best offer or keep the quitter around if we can’t get a first and a third?
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
There will not be a CBA next year
so he will be a RFA. If he is tendered with the value of a 1st and a 3rd any team that signs him has to give at least this much to the Broncos. Now I believe if we tender him and no one signs him he will be around next year at a similiar salary. I do not think we should cut him out right. we need to get at least a 1rst rounder for the guy. I think there will be takers for a 1st and a 3rd
by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 4, 2010 5:03 PM MST up reply actions
Some Team WILL bite!
-Richee
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
by BroncoSense72 on Jan 4, 2010 5:08 PM MST up reply actions
I think someone will pony up a 1st & a 3rd
But even if no one does, we can still trade him after we sign him to the tender. We will get value for him one way or the other. My bet is a 1st & a 3rd though.
Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds. - Albert Einstein
Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them. - Albert Einstein
Also will get at least a 1st and a 3rd
because he will be tendered at that value. I think he is worth more then a 1st and a 3rd
by gnarlybroncodude on Jan 4, 2010 4:31 PM MST up reply actions
get Bus Cook on the line
He will get every media and team thinking this is the second coming of Jerry Rice on the open market
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:35 PM MST up reply actions
does his RFA status restrict a pure trade?
Or must he agree to a new contract before a straight trade can be made.
As well, if so many RFA’s are based on 1st + 3rd round picks, do you think it’s likely there will be many teams doing this to pry someone away from another team. I think Marshall may be one of the very few RFA’s to move this year.
side note: Can MHR have a language filter? So anytime someone types Javon Walker it shows up as [explative withheld] ?
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:33 PM MST up reply actions
Nothing stopping a pure trade
But I dn’t think a team would trade for him without first working out a new deal for him Broncos could give the other team permission to do that.
War is behavior with its roots in the primal sea - eat whatever you touch, or it will eat you. John Fowles
thank you... pass the Bart Scott this a-way New Joosey.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 4:37 PM MST up reply actions
lol
word!
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:51 PM MST up reply actions
New England
Maybe we could get 2 of the Patriots 2nd round picks for the guy..
sounds like Welker is going to be out for a bit..
LOL
Belechik coaching Moss AND Marshall?? This I GOTTA SEE. : )
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Jan 4, 2010 4:52 PM MST up reply actions
Ha ha..."knee jerk"...
Right.
Anyone who thinks this team is in a terrible place because of a coaching performance that made Jim Zorn look like Don Shula is just having a “knee jerk” reaction. Because finishing 2-8 down the stretch isn’t enough proof to make an accurate decision.
Orton and the terrible defensive line has got to go QUICK AND FAST
orton is not a starter thomas,crowder,moss and that whole draft class has got to go.trade bailey before its to late he is to old we need new blood a new look.we need someone who can push the ball down the field how bout MICHAEL VICK
OMG...Talk about knee jerk reaction...Sheesh
-Richee
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
by BroncoSense72 on Jan 4, 2010 5:17 PM MST up reply actions
Yup
-Richee
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
by BroncoSense72 on Jan 4, 2010 6:26 PM MST up reply actions
That's the funniest thing I've read all day.
I'm glad we had this talk.
(signature courtesy of TJ Johnson)
by BroncoInExile on Jan 4, 2010 6:08 PM MST up reply actions
I am so glad you aren't the Broncos head coach.
That is entirely a terrible idea. From top to bottom.
John Clayton is the head Dean at Fail University (known as F.U. in short)
Formerly known as Calijoefornia
I can't believe you're harder on Marsh than Scheff.
ZooTown wrote a great fanpost that provides a far better assessment of the situation than yours.
And what’s with the Scheff love? He has never learned to block in four years. BMarsh would be a better TE than him—he can actually block. Then to stand behind him when he goes to the media and’s like ‘all the other guys hate that I was benched’!? Gimme a break, John.
Because Montana has no professional sports, I gotta support the land of my birth.
Socrates was once executed for 'trolling'.
^Needs explaining: don't call someone asking uncomfortable, slightly antagonistic questions trolls. In all odds they probably just want to learn. It's real easy to differentiate a 'Socratic' post from a trolling one (unless you're a resident of WCG).
^Needs further explaining: I have yet to post anything on WCG, don't worry, I'm not trying to rationalize anything I've done. I've just lurked over there and man, they are the model of post-peloponnesian war Athens.
I don't really get the Scheff love myself.
His legend is much bigger than his accomplishments. He’s had some nice game, some cool catches, but so have about 2/3 of the TE’s in football.
I don’t have anything against him. But he’s a bigger legend in Denver than anywhere else.
So this is war...misfortune at every bend in the road. Misery and murdered mules and sudden death in a ditch.-- Rick Atkinson
by PredominantlyOrange on Jan 4, 2010 6:22 PM MST up reply actions
What's our record over the past 4 years?
Blame goes to everyone. Unless scheffler and Marshall undoubtedly prove they can change then there is not a reason to give them the benefit of the doubt. They should not be in this situation.
by broncodude793 on Jan 4, 2010 6:24 PM MST via mobile reply actions

by 
































