Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

The Rest of the West - Week 6

What in the world is going on with this division? The only AFC West team to win in week 5 was the Raiders. Hold on.... That can't be right.....

Hm. I guess it is. I've been religiously checking the sports sites just to see if there was some type of mistake in the scoring of the game. They all say the same thing, so I guess the Raiders actually did win. Surprising...

But what wasn't surprising about this weekend was the Chiefs losing. I wish I was the only person who predicted this, but I wasn't. Although, to be honest, I was a bit surprised at how close the game was. I expected a blowout, but the game was tied at 9 going into the fourth quarter.

Despite what the scoreboard said, with no passing game to speak of, the Chiefs could only hope to hang around and pray that they break the game open with a huge rushing or special teams touchdown. It didn't happen and the Colts won.

Here are the AFC West Division Standings, as of week 5:


AFC West Standings

W L T PF PA
Kansas City 3 1 0 77 57
Denver 2 3 0 104 116
Oakland 2 3 0 111 134
San Diego 2 3 0 140 106

(updated 10.12.2010 at 4:27 AM EDT)


Unbelievable, isn't it? The Chiefs on top of the division by one game with a three way tie for second. Talk about a wide open division...

Star-divide

The Kansas City Chiefs

Chiefs_medium 

Last Week

The Chiefs lost to the Indianapolis Colts 9-19.

Like I said above, I'm surprised it was that close. In fact, at the end of the third quarter the score was tied at 9. I did not expect it, at all. The key to this game was, once again, third downs. The Colts were 8 for 17 (47%) on third downs while the Chiefs were 1 for 10 (10%) on third downs.

You don't have to be a mathematician - I'm certainly not one, anyways - to figure out that 1 for 10 is not good. Like I've said in the past....

You heard it here first...They will not be 6-0. They are just too capricious on third downs to beat a well-built football team.

Despite how egotistical it is to use myself as a reference, I stand by that statement for the 3rd straight week. Their third down efficiency is hurting the potential of the Chiefs. I think they could be a much better football team if they could manufacture some kind of third down efficiency.

I told a few posters in the comments section of last week's "The Rest of the West - Week 5", the following...

If they [the Chiefs] can show me that they are able to sustain a drive and frustrate Peyton Manning, then I will have to take a long look in the mirror this weekend. I don’t see that happening, right now, but we’ll see what happens.

Well, the Chiefs frustrated Peyton Manning (26 for 44 for 244 yards 0 TDs and 1 INT) and the Chiefs offense had 5 drives with 10 or more total plays. They reached both stipulations I laid out for them, so I did what I promised and took a long look in the mirror. After doing that, I determined that I vastly underrated the impact of the Chiefs running game. They are a solid unit. Jamal Charles rushed for 87 yards on 16 carries while Thomas Jones rushed for 19 yards on 8 carries. Over 100 yards in a game is impressive, especially when your passing game is sputtering.

 

This Week

They take on the Houston Texans (3-2).

The battle of the 3 win ball clubs. It's going to be interesting to see how they fare against the Texans who boast one of the league's worst pass defenses, but are the 5th best rushing defense (79.6 rushing yards allowed per game). The Texans are statistically the best rush defense that the Chiefs will face all year. Granted, they haven't had many offenses challenge them on the ground because of their struggles with pass defense (32nd.... last in the NFL in pass yards allowed).

 

My Take on the Chiefs

There has been an unusual amount of optimism in Kansas City lately. I'm all for that. I hate to harsh the mellow, but the Chiefs still have no passing game. It also doesn't help that the Chiefs aren't going to be able to run rampant against every team in the NFL. The Colts gave up 113 yards on the ground, but are the 29th ranked rush defense in the NFL. Anomaly? Perhaps, but maybe NFL defense are just starting to figure out that the Chiefs can't beat you in the air, so you may as well stack the box and take your chances with one on one wide receiver coverage.

I've been talking about third down completion percentage all year and it will make a difference down the stretch. The Chiefs are not cutting the mustard. They are 29th in the league in third down conversion percentage, above only the Bills, Redskins, and Bears. The Bills are.... the Bills. The Redskins have had 4 of their 5 games come down to the last play. The Bears allowed 10 sacks in a game... check that... what I meant to say was that the Bears allowed 10 sacks in a half. Jay Cutler is still trying to forget that one, I'm sure.

The Chiefs record may be 3-1 right now, but I'm telling you that it won't be pretty if they can't improve their efficiency. I can't make it any clearer than that, so we'll move on to the Chargers.

 


The San Diego Chargers

Chargers_medium 

Last week

The San Diego Chargers lost to the Oakland Raiders 27-35.

That's just about all I have to say about that.

San Diego special teams.... really? No, it wouldn't be enough to give up one blocked punt. Just for good measure, it would be better to allow 2 blocked punts. How can this happen? I've tried to think of excuses for them, but nothing can explain why this can happen. It's just embarrassing.

Not only did the Chargers special teams try to lose the game, but the Chargers offense decided to jump in on the action, as well. Not only would the offense fumble the ball on the Oakland 1 yard line, they also gave up a strip sack at the end of the game that would be picked up by T Branch and run for the game winning touchdown.

3 lost fumbles, 2 blocked punts, 1 embarrassing loss to the Raiders.

Solid ideas, San Diego.

Let's come back to the lambasting of the Chargers in a few minutes. For a moment, I'd like to tip my heat to the San Diego defense. Not only did they allow only 19 points and 279 yards, they did so with Shawne Merriman, Jyles Tucker, Larry English, and Brandon Siler out with injury. All of them are linebackers. Essentially, they are playing with an entire linebacking corp of backups. Too bad the offense and special teams gave the game away.


Roster Moves

The Chargers have signed wide receiver Richard Goodman from their practice squad to their active roster and not a moment too soon. Although Richard Goodman will likely sit the bench when the offense is on the field, he was brought up in an attempt to help out the special teams. In preseason, he played well as a kick returner and on kick coverage.

They better hope it works. They have given up two kick returns for a touchdown and one punt return for touchdown. Let's not forget the two blocked punts in Oakland, either. The Chargers need all the help they can get on special teams.

Also announced was the signing of Marcus McNeill. On Monday he signed a five year contract extension that will be tacked on to his one year, $630,000 tender that he accepted in September. Marcus McNeill will be a charger through 2015.

The Chargers officially activated McNeill on Monday. He will play against St. Louis.

 

This Week

The San Diego Chargers will take on the St. Louis Rams (2-3).

If I told you 6 months ago that the Rams and Chargers would have the same record after five weeks, you'd probably laugh at me and throw rocks. Well, it happened, although I can't honestly say that I predicted it. Hindsight is 20/20, I suppose.

Anyways, this game will come down to turnovers, once again. The Rams are not as good as the Chargers. I think we can safely say that. However, the Chargers have proven time and again that they are willing to throw away a game at any moment with special teams woes or turnovers. Despite being ranked first in a bunch of categories (first downs per game, total yardage, passing touchdowns, and yards per play) and second in numerous others (time of possession and points per game).... they have 2 wins and 3 losses. 

The reason is because the Chargers have 13 turnovers in 5 games. In each loss, they have had more than 3 turnovers (3 against the Raiders, 3 against the Chiefs, and 4 against the Seahawks). So, 10 turnovers in their 3 losses (3.333 turnovers per game) and 3 turnovers in their 2 wins (1.5 turnovers per game).

If they turn the ball over 3 or more times, expect a loss.

 

My Take on the Chargers

Like I said last week, the Chargers are hard to figure out. They are statistically one of the best teams in football, but they turn the ball over at the worst time possible. Yes, the Chargers do some very good things and put up a ton of yards. However, bad plays cancel out good plays... especially when they're really bad plays... and especially if those plays turn the ball over to the other team... and especially if that change of possession yields points in the other direction.

The Chargers have a lot of bad plays. Until they can figure things out and hold on to the ball, they are going to continue to have terrible losses against sub-par opponents such as the Raiders.

 

 

The Oakland Raiders

Raiders_medium

Last Week

The Oakland Raiders beat the San Diego Chargers 35-27.

The Raiders did a great job turning the Chargers' mistakes into points in the other direction. We've talked already about how the Chargers squandered opportunities, but if it wasn't for the Raiders picking up the ball and doing something with it, the Chargers still would have won.

Which leads me to another heralded rant...

 

The Best Team Doesn't Always Win?

You know the expression "the best team doesn't always win"? Well, I don't subscribe to that idea, at all. The best team always wins. Granted, the team that wins isn't always the team with the better record or the team that has better stats or even the team that has more "franchise players". The team that wins is the team with the most points on the scoreboard as time expires. 

I say that because I have heard "the best team doesn't always win" a lot in the past few days. The people who say this are apologists. Plain and simple. To make themselves feel better, Chargers apologists may say something like "well, if we didn't have a thousand turnovers, we'd win" or "if we didn't have an awful special teams, we'd win".

To that, I would say, "Yeah... well... they do commit a lot of turnovers and they do have an awful special teams. No 'ifs" about it".

But KB... if you take away the two blocked punts....

Stop it!

We're not going to take away anything. Don't cheapen the Raiders win or the Chargers loss. They happened. The Raiders won, so I tip my cap to them. Unfortunately for the Raiders and their fans, however, not every team in the NFL will gift wrap a game for them like this past week against the Chargers. Don't get used to it.

After protecting the legitimacy of the Raiders, I need to go shower, but it had to be done.


This Week

The Raiders will face the San Francisco 49ers (0-5) in San Francisco.

Despite the 49ers being winless, they are 7 point favorites according to the lines. That's interesting, considering the 49ers are 30th in the NFL in rushing offense and 31st in points per game.

Oh well, it is what it is. The 49ers are statistically terrible but they play good teams fairly close. They lost by 3 points or less to the Saints, Eagles, and Falcons. I think that they (much like the Cincinnati Bengals) have most of the pieces, but they just haven't found a way to put it together. Frank Gore isn't a bad running back and Vernon Davis is one of the best in the league. Despite that, they are winless. They'll, no doubt, be looking to beat up on the Raiders (who may be without Darren McFadden, again) to get their first win of the season.

 

My Take on the Raiders

The Raiders are still the Raiders. Obviously, I have no idea how to pick their games. I have picked their game incorrectly for 4 consecutive weeks. Perhaps I was too early to stick a fork in them after they were 1-3. Who knew that the Chargers were going to bring the Raiders back into the AFC West picture? I sure didn't.

A win against the winless 49ers will put them at 3-3. To be honest, I didn't expect them to be sitting at .500 after 6 weeks. I reserve judgement this week because it's tough to see what the Raiders really are when they're facing a Chargers team that can't hold on to the ball. Will we be able to use the winless 49ers as a measuring stick this week? We'll see.

 

There is your weekly look at the rest of the AFC West.... 

Go Broncos!

Comment 27 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I swear, on that play when Rivers fumbled

It looked like an Oakland defender had a chance to light his dumb ass up and instead just shoved him. I would have given ANYTHING to see that doosh get laid out ala Kurt Warner from last year

by TXBroncoFan on Oct 12, 2010 7:18 PM MDT reply actions  

I still find it hard to believe

the Niners are 0-5

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.

by KaptainKirk on Oct 12, 2010 7:34 PM MDT reply actions  

Me too.

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.

by Troy Hufford on Oct 12, 2010 7:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good news in KC

Our Defense…

Sadly, the only yards on offense is rushing and defensive penalties. If only we could combine our rushing attack with the Broncos passing attack…

I also seem to like these, another decent assessment. Rec’d.

Jamaal Charles...Enough said.

Picks
47-29

by Chiefsfan85 on Oct 12, 2010 8:04 PM MDT reply actions  

I thought about merging, too.

Can you IMAGINE the juggernaught with our passing and your running? I guess that’s what fantasy football is about…..

-Harvey J. Neptune

"Either way, this game will be put in perspective and ultimately, win or lose, will not mean nearly as much as all of us waking up in the morning, taking a deep breath, appreciating what we have and living our lives for as long as we are given the gift of life." - KentuckyBronco

by HarvJNep2n on Oct 12, 2010 8:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

only if we can be on top...

http://www.centsports.com/ref/698077/Joe_Vick

If you think you know sports, try betting here for free.
I'm up to 3 dollars!

by Whidbey Bronco on Oct 13, 2010 6:54 AM MDT up reply actions  

Great Piece

I always look forward to these

Better than Pick`em, free 10¢ CentSports Check it Out!!

by Sergio AppleSeed on Oct 12, 2010 9:17 PM MDT reply actions  

The Charges are sporting he same record they did last year after 5 games (2-3)...

Their last loss was on Monday Night against the Broncos at SD…They never looked back after that night winning 11 yes that’s right 11 in a row! The 3 loses they had came with giving up a least 30 points. In the remaining 11 games the most they gave up was to Cincinnati (24)…Can they repeat that record? They weren’t turning over the ball as much last year and t be as successful they will have to play less mistake football…I have predicted they won’t be the strong December team they have been in the past…We’ll see, there is a lot football left to find out.

by bfree2bronc on Oct 12, 2010 9:58 PM MDT reply actions  

And to be a good team you need to win on the road.

I am waiting for the day the Chargers are knocked out of playoff contention.

Floyd Little: HOF Class of 2010.

2009-10 back-to-back NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009-10 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant

by weazel on Oct 12, 2010 10:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good job.

Great assessment, the lack of product really killed us. I’ve watched the game 3 times now, and i realize that 19-9 sounds like we played poorly, but i beg to differ. Haley wanted to run the ball and at his press conference said they stuck too it. I think Haley made several mistakes in the game, but i won’t list the on side kick as one of them.

Haley should have attack the Colts secondary more even if it looked like running the ball was keeping us in the game. Even if Butterfingers Bowe was dropping everything including TD’s, yeah kinda buttsore about the drops but it’s not quite as bad as the BroncoBitch bet :P

Now where was I , oh yeah we drive down the field in our first possession, 15 plays I might add, to the 8 yard line and on 4th and 2 Haley goes for it. At that point if I had any hair I would have pulled it out, you have to get 3 points and even it up, especially after giving them the ball at our 38 in a fail on-side attempt. On-side kick, questionable, going for it on 4th down when the game could have been tied, stupid IMO.

Other stupid move was at the end of the game, when instead of trying for a TD he has our kicker come out and attempt a 51 yard FG, IMO showing his lack of trust in his Offense and M.Cassel. Plus Succop has already had problems kicking it from over 45, so why put the game on him at that point and let it get too him, i don’t understand it. I realize that at that point in the game the offense was doing nothing, but at some point game management has to go out the window, and the killer instinct has to come out.

What i think needs to happen at this point, M.Cassel needs to watch some video of what real QB’s do like looking safeties off, going to his 2nd and 3rd options, and just plain seeing the damn field. Then we have Mr. My brain is somewhere over Dwayne Bowe during the damn game, he has got to catch the damn ball or the next bus, at this point i don’t care anymore. Bowe dropping that TD pass in the 3rd QTR with 3:37 left killed us and i knew we would lose after that play. This game was 12-9 until 4:39 of the 4th QTR and if Bowe had caught that pass we would have been in the lead 13-12 it’s a damn shame.

Defense looks great IMO they played a hell of a game no thank to Haley and our offense. If you get a chance to watch the game please do so, and if you need the link to be able to watch them let me now.

A.K.A CPT.Caveman or Oblivious it would seem.

by BroncoBitch on Oct 12, 2010 10:56 PM MDT reply actions  

Wow after rereading my own post.

I’m starting to think that 7th grade English would’ve been better for me than weed.

A.K.A CPT.Caveman or Oblivious it would seem.

by BroncoBitch on Oct 12, 2010 11:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Broncobitch bet? What?

Floyd Little: HOF Class of 2010.

2009-10 back-to-back NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009-10 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant

by weazel on Oct 12, 2010 11:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm CPT.Caveman

I bet some of the guys here that the Chiefs would beat the Colts, and if i lost i would change my ID too BroncoBitch.

A.K.A CPT.Caveman or Oblivious it would seem.

by BroncoBitch on Oct 12, 2010 11:36 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

Oh, ok

I saw your sig and was wondering what it was.

Floyd Little: HOF Class of 2010.

2009-10 back-to-back NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009-10 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant

by weazel on Oct 13, 2010 12:42 AM MDT up reply actions  

great sig caveman!

http://www.centsports.com/ref/698077/Joe_Vick

If you think you know sports, try betting here for free.
I'm up to 3 dollars!

by Whidbey Bronco on Oct 13, 2010 6:55 AM MDT up reply actions  

How in the world

Is KC winning with no scoring offense. I’m sorry, but I refuse to believe that their D is that f’n great (good and young but not great). I imagine the Chiefs are going to experience something like our boys did last year – riding high on that D until some offense exposes them to the rest of the league. I fully expect our Broncos to show some cards that we’ve been hiding for our division games, possibly some wildhorse. I’ve got a feeling that the Broncos are going to play real tough against the AFC West. Do the Chiefs play the Ravens this year?

by PaleHorse78 on Oct 12, 2010 11:29 PM MDT reply actions  

Nope we don't play the Ravens.

Here’s the rest of our games:
Texans at home
Jags in K.C
Bills in K.C
Raiders at home
Broncos at home
Cards in K.C
Seahawks at home
Broncos in K.C
Chargers at home
Rams at home
Titans in K.C
Raiders in K.C

8-8 should be easy.

A.K.A CPT.Caveman or Oblivious it would seem.

by BroncoBitch on Oct 12, 2010 11:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

I wanted to disagree

but you are right, 8-8 should be easy for the Chiefs. Wins against the Bills, Cards, Seahawks, and a win from the poo-poo platter of AFC west teams combined with a win at home against the Raiders would get them there. I didn’t realize how easy a schedule the Chiefs had combined with a much better defense and some young players that are playing out of their mind. The Chiefs could win the division or at least finish at .500.

by D-fence on Oct 13, 2010 1:59 AM MDT up reply actions  

Our defense is actually pretty good

Crennel can work wonders

Flowers and Hali are both studs.

Dorsey is finally playing to his potential.

Jamaal Charles...Enough said.

Picks
47-29

by Chiefsfan85 on Oct 13, 2010 12:09 AM MDT up reply actions  

I will give you this BroncoBitch

Your guys special teams and rooks this year look awesome. I think I just puked in my mouth a little bit.

by PaleHorse78 on Oct 12, 2010 11:31 PM MDT reply actions  

Houston run defense ranking is illusory

Week 1 – Indy ran only 10 times and passed 57 times ;
Week 2 – Redskins ran only 17 times, passed 38 times;
Week 3 – Dallas ran 26 times and passed 30 times;
Week 4 – Oakland ran 22 times and passed 39 times;
Week 5 – Giants ran 26 times and passed 42 times.

The Cowboys were the only team that went at Houston with anything close to a balanced offense. Everyone else was bombs away. The Chiefs’ run game is quite a bit better than the other five Houston has seen. They’ll get theirs.

by DenverGregg on Oct 13, 2010 6:13 AM MDT reply actions  

Illusory?... interesting.

I think it’s more unknown than illusory. They don’t know what they have because they haven’t really been tested on the ground very much. Everyone sees their pass defense and attacks it.

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.

by Troy Hufford on Oct 13, 2010 7:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry

But I have to call out most of my fellow Bronco fans when it comes to KC sudden 3-1 start. If not for some out of character plays from HC Haley, the Chiefs would have won. Say what you will about the Colts but that team doesn’t resemble the playoff hardened squad that we’re accustomed to and I only need to reference are head to head matchup a few weeks ago. Denver just last year were winning games through plays from defense, special teams and few offensive gems such as the Stokley catch and run or Marshall’s individual performance against Dallas. Denver led the league in three and outs last year and it showed. Putting aside fandom here and appreciating the sport of football, yes the Chiefs are for real just from what they’ve done so far with the games played. Just as we proclaimed last year that our schedule wasn’t easy before a snap was played (turned out we had an easy schedule after 16 games), the Chiefs are in the predicament. I can easily them taking the division soley on the talent on the coaching side. Denver on the other hand has taken a hit w/some reputable coaches parting ways. Aside from McDaniels, we have a lot of coaches under fire for the very first and to be frank, this both a concern and a good (as we have clearly fully transitioned from the WCO that’s been a staple for more than a decade). Its this very tangible is what makes KC special because the coaching staff has immediate credibility and that alone attributes to wins they shouldn’t be getting. Again, to base a team’s ability to perform off last year is reall naïve because the premise is this: continuity in coaching=improved play (KC, Oak and Denver share this as Turner is usually under fire due to starts like SD is currently experiencing). So a word of advice, before screaming how great our offense is, the running game has been stymied by injury and personnel (experience comes to mind to 3 new additions) and our defense is dealing w/injuries. Let’s enjoy the growth of our new additions and keep our attention onto our team because bias views can sure make us seem well, biasly blind.

Say hello to my fast...

by dcrespo7 on Oct 13, 2010 7:53 AM MDT via mobile reply actions  

Best team doesn't alway win

… is an absolutely true statement. But it depends on how you define “best”.

My definition in that statement is that in a 7 game sample, the “best team” is the one that will win 4+ games. The parity in the NFL is such that even if you take Baltimore or Pitt vs. Buffalo, in 7 games the Bills are likely to steal at least 1 game… and thats the extreme case. In the more “normal” case, its probably never more than a 60%-65% chance that the “best” team will actually win… there is just too much variability/luck/randomness is a 60min game. As such, the “best team doesn’t always win,” and it can vastly skew perceptions of team quality because W-L records are such small samples. The difference between 6-10 and 10-6 may really be just a couple odd of bounces.

In a division like the AFC-W, where 3 teams all look about equal with big strengths and equally big weaknesses (KC, SD, DEN) and one just a small step back (Oak), that means predicting final outcomes for the season is basically impossible. It will largely come down to the division games, and wierdness (like multiple blocked punts, etc.) may have more to do with the eventual division winner than any real difference in team quality.

That, or KC’s ridiculously easy schedule compared to DEN/SD could be the difference if we split division games, as they get 2 games vs. bad teams like BUF while we get opponents like Baltimore… that 1 or 2 games could be the difference, as otherwise I see them as a basically a push.

by cjfarls on Oct 13, 2010 8:34 AM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgres_small
Are You Nuts? No Plan B?
Oc_small
I NEED YOUR HELP MHR: The Down Under Bowl

Recent FanPosts

Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick Really Worth? Pt. 2.
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
Glad for Gronkowski
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick REALLY Worth?
Index_small
Nate Irving!
Fhgfhgfhg_small
Rod Smith is a Hall of Famer....Right?
205783_109706759113985_100002239833864_101133_7230028_n_small
My Final 53
00000021_small
J-Man 2012 NFL preview First of 3 Editions
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Payette_011_small
3 X 80 = ???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Broncos-von-miller_small Scotty Payne

Ph_small BroncoPH

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall