Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Diagnosing the Problem: Stand Pat, Mr. Bowlen

Mr. Bowlen,

With all the angst going around calling for Josh McDaniels' head on a platter, the firing of Brian Xanders or even calls for you to sell the team (really?), I have come to realize that this is actually your doing. Since these problems are yours and yours alone, let me explain why I believe you must stand pat and stick to your original plan.

It was you, Mr. Bowlen, who decided to hire a new Head Coach and General Manager who have huge potential and tremendous football IQ, but who both wholly lacked any experience within their new positions.  These two men have had to earn their spurs on the job and mistakes have been made, however, they have also made some brilliant moves. The up and down nature of their performance is more indicative of their learning curve than an indictment of some inability to do their job.

As Josh McDaniels continues his growth as a motivator and play caller, his players will gradually respond more and more to their leader. It could happen overnight through a huge moment, it may have already happened and the results are soon to follow or it may never happen. If the latter is the case, then it would be prudent to make a change, so long as McDaniels was given his full term to make something of this team.

Brian Xanders has already made a positive mark on this football team through the draft and free agency. His unique ability to seemingly work well with Josh McDaniels without overbearing egos impresses me. It is refreshing considering how many A.J. Smith's are out there emasculating their respective head coaches.

Star-divide

The problem is, Mr. Bowlen, you decided to hire your two leading men with a combined zero years of experience at their respective positions to completely rebuild your football team. Such a task will take more than eighteen months to complete and it is up to you to show Broncoland your patience and resolve to look at the big picture. Fans and Journalists are not exactly macro-thinkers, rather they are invariably prone to emotional and irrational thoughts. A man in your position must look years into the future and I must believe you had to have known there would be more bad games than good games in the first two years. 

This is why I believe you must stand pat, Mr. Bowlen. If these words have not convinced you, allow me to expand upon my opinion with some facts.

  • 32 players from the 2008 roster are no longer playing in the National Football League. By comparison, the 2008 Kansas City Chiefs who went 2-14 for the season had 22 players out of the NFL by 2010. Even one of the worst teams in the football had more long term depth on its roster than the Broncos did.
  • Draft failures from 2001-2008 have crippled the organization. Two pretty solid drafts and two solid free agencies will not be enough to correct the terrible drafts of the previous seven years. Brian Xanders and Josh McDaniels have thus far proven an ability in drafting quality players. It certainly appears there is light at the end of this very dark and dismal tunnel.
  • Mike Shanahan spent his final years denying the reality that the Broncos needed to enter a rebuilding mode. His delay made things far worse than they were in Kansas City, as Herm Edwards actually made a few steps prior to being fired towards rebuilding. Josh McDaniels and Brian Xanders are 18 months into a complete rebuilding of the team.
These are facts as well as the general consensus of many others whose opinions and knowledge I personally respect. You must know this organization still has much work to do to correct the years of denial and neglect put forth by the previous regime. 

From where I sit today, I can no longer deny that your organization is rebuilding. We fans tried to fool ourselves into thinking there was more to this team than what is. I am starting to wonder if you, Mr. Bowlen, and Joe Ellis already knew this. In fact, in hindsight, Xanders may have inadvertantly alluded to this fact when he said the following several weeks ago:

"We let go of 32 players from 2008 (roster and practice squad) who were here who never played in the NFL again," Xanders said. "There's a plan in place. We're laying the foundation for success. And most of the decisions have been productive."

-via the Denver Post

So in hindsight, I must apologize to you as well Mr. Bowlen. My expectations of this team were not realistic. That is not to say I am not happy with the direction the organization is headed, rather I am just having a difficult time keeping my head straight as we all walk through the dark tunnel together. I see the light; I hope you do as well.

For now, I am grateful to have a great owner for my team. I believe in what Brian Xanders and Josh McDaniels are doing to build this team and we all must weather the storm as they both grow into their roles as General Manager and Head Coach, as well as, weathering the mistake-prone youngsters that are now filling out the roster. As time goes on, the storms will become less intense and eventually disappear, while the mistakes and gaffs will evaporate with each game played.

For certainly, starting over is a far worse proposition than staying the course. 

Go Broncos!

Poll
Stay the Course and Weather This Storm?
Yes
1374 votes
No
580 votes

1954 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 381 comments  |  41 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Winning the Rose Bowl

Jan 2011 from Frogs O' War - 0 comments

TCU 21, Wisconsin 19

Jan 2011 from Frogs O' War - 0 comments

Frog Defense Three-peats

Jan 2011 from Frogs O' War - 0 comments

2010 Dominance Ranking

Jan 2011 from Frogs O' War - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

Love it, Tim

I think you’re spot on. Re-tooling was a term thrown around here, and we certainly did a nice job of masking holes on this team through free agency, signing veterans at key positions who could contribute in the short term while you build for the long term. It’s a great strategy, IMO, and because we were so healthy last year, it worked for us to the tune of 8 victories. This year, those key vets have been injured, and we have been battered and bruised as a whole. McDaniels will be criticized, but I think he’s got to grow just like any other newcomer to this league.

follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles

yep....that's for real

by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 1, 2010 12:45 PM MDT reply actions   3 recs

Thanks bud

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 12:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good write-up Tim. I support McD and this article.

by Auz on Nov 1, 2010 5:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ditto what he said

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Nov 1, 2010 6:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

Great read, Tim.

I am proud of our team and the decision makers who make thing happen. I say “stay the course”!

by CyberSpartacus on Nov 1, 2010 12:49 PM MDT reply actions  

thanks!

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 12:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

I guess the pain we are feeling now

Is what will make the future Super Bowl victories all that much more enjoyable.
Ugh Stop the pain.

Bronco Champions are being forged as we speak.

by BroncoRick69 on Nov 1, 2010 12:55 PM MDT reply actions  

Yeah, it is painful.

Just need to see some progress from the pit of despair of the last two weeks.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thank You

That’s it. People don’t realize what this team was. The players cut NEVER played in the nfl again. 18 months is NOT enough time to replace those players. Let alone a whole new coaching staff and new scheme/systems on each side of the ball. Give it time. Great post love it.

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 12:58 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Thanks!

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

so....

did Shanny (the devil incarnate) do more with less…and has McD (our newfound savior) done less with more? We all know Shanny, the GM, wasn’t particularly good over the last few years of his time with the Broncos, but Shanny the coach seems to have gotten more out of his available players.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 1:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but Shanny's inflexibility was his undoing.

And the team he left behind was crap.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:47 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

you may be right with his inflexibility...

but what he left behind was a mediocre team. Not a crap team. No…same thing McD has right now (playing like crap right now). It’s just funny how much people have blamed Shanny for all our woes. It isn’t his fault that the Broncos now have 3 separate 4 game losing streaks in less than 2 years! Given 2 more years, I have no doubt our offense would be clicking on all phases (granted with a few more INT’s) but a much stronger run game to offset things. And I believe our defense might even be a bit better than what we have now because we wouldn’t have had to waste a 3 1st round draft choices on a mediocre RB, a WR, and a QB who will need 3 years to really have a chance…or a 2nd on a TE that rarely gets used. No…I honestly believe that we might be in a better spot now if we had stayed the course then….we certainly couldn’t be worse for it.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 2:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

But remember too Shanny was no rookie.

McD is learning on the job, whether we like it or not, that’s the fact.

What’s hard for Bronco fans is that were used to 10-6 and out in the playoffs.
So maybe a year or two out of the playoffs will make the end result better.

by hallandnash on Nov 1, 2010 7:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

But the team those 32 players partly constituted

apparently had no problem counting to eleven. How many times in a year and a half have we had ten or twelve players on the field when the ball was hiked? is that lack of attention to detail attrubutable to the players or to the coaches?

"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.

by spock on Nov 1, 2010 4:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

Players

When a coach sets formation and gameplans, I’m pretty sure they have 11 on the plan. At some point the players have to take some responsibility to know they have to be on the damn field.

by hallandnash on Nov 1, 2010 7:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

I talked about this elsewhere

We do a lot of substitutions on defense, and we play a risky game by substituting only after we see opponent substitutions (though some situations they don’t), so the defense is behind the 8-ball with that strategy. My thought is that in the long run they are willing to take a chance if it means getting the best personnel matchups they can manage, even though the risk of a miscommunication that doesn’t get recognized or solved in time goes up significantly. Not an excuse, just a possible explanation of why we have seen 2 on the D and one on STs so far in just 8 games.

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 8:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

Also illegal formation

The WRs are obviously thinking in this complex offense, because they have been called three times this year for not covering up the TE or OT when they flank. Royal, Gaff, and Thomas have been the culprits. Which has got me thinking about Graham. Normally when the TE moves off the line, he will point to the nearest receiver, sort of like a reminder to step up. Graham pretty much just keeps to himself before the snap. I know he has been frustrated in the past when he doesn’t get used more in the receiving game, but i don’t know if he is the type of guy to let his play as a blocker and teammate suffer because of it….

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 8:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thats elementary though

Complex or not lining up is the simplest part about the play.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 2, 2010 7:16 AM MDT up reply actions  

It is

Just pointing out that of all the ways to get an illegal formation, ours are coming from the WRs.

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 2, 2010 1:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

If shanahan were here we wouldn"t have had the first round picks to "waste" because we'd still have cutler.

we wouldn’t have used those picks to better our defense because we wouldn’t have had those picks at all.

by bailey disciple on Nov 1, 2010 4:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think even the MSM believes Cutler is a knucklehead

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

He was a good coach

and was an AWFUL GM. If he had handed off the GM part to someone else then he would still be the coach.

User name pronounced Air-Ah-Miss Originally from my days in the SCA, became a gamer and forum tag because it is odd and it is a name I like

by Arimaris on Nov 1, 2010 10:29 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

You have to keep in mind Shanahan

"I don't need love, I just need wins." -Kyle Orton, 2010

by gahoagie on Nov 1, 2010 2:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

had MUCH mor experience than McDaniels has

(Sorry, hit the wrong button)

"I don't need love, I just need wins." -Kyle Orton, 2010

by gahoagie on Nov 1, 2010 2:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

gcman

Shanny wasn’t called “The Mastermind” for no reason. he was one of the few coaches who could consistently outcoach Belicheck during a game, and his gameplans were epic. i used to have a copy of one, and it was about 233 pages long and had i don’t know how many plays for the offesnse set up, about 4 per page, for about 50 pages or so. Shanny was also entering his 15th and 16th years coaching, so the guy had seen it all.

However, he himself admitted that he needed to get up to date and see a little bit more football, which was a big reason he took the year off. Teams wanted him, but he wanted to come back to the game better, whichis also a hallmark of shanny, his untiring pursuit of perfection.

But that was a trait that rubbed a lot of players the wrong way, and he had a very skewed way of looking at team and staff loyalty. The nepotism on his staff was a major reason he was fired. the intellectual foundation of the team hadn’t been challenged in years, and had developed the staleness of an inbred members only club. The results trickled out onto the field long after the true damage had been done.

So yes, Shanny did more with less, but he is and was an established HOFer in my opinion. His gameday coaching was the envy of his peers, but in the end, it wasn’t enough, and the context became untenable for Bowlen, who had to try to change the fortunes of his team in the midst of the mess.

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 4:16 PM MDT up reply actions   3 recs

I wouldve loved to seen one of those game plans.

WAs it a plan when Elway and DAvis were around with lots of roll outs and off tackles or was it a simplified plan for Griese?

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 4:44 PM MDT up reply actions  

For fun

here is a scouting report he put together. For reference, most teams can get by with 50-80 page scouting reports, lol.

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 6:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

nice link.

that’s interesting. hopefully, snyder bought shanny an iPad so he can stop abusing the ditto machine though.

and it looks like the broncs lost 29-10 that game. maybe his report missed something?…

I'm not sugarcoating this.

by oxmouth on Nov 1, 2010 9:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

One more rec and it's green

That was a great post Colinski. It pays attention to how the many aspects come together to make a good to great team.
I will take one of the great quotes I keep hearing about Shanahan and put it to this team. I think we are only a couple of good players away from a great team. That is counting on having our injured starters on the field as well. If we keep consistency in coaching and our air attack then work can be done in the three (my top issues) areas we need to improve to start winning. Offensive line, run blocking in particular. Defensive line/LB corp, run stopping in particular. #1 ST play. Top issue is to get returners that we don’t want healthy at other positions, next is discipline, discipline, discipline!

Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Don’t worry about it. As an ignorant redneck, I’m qualified to say that.

by Sean in Pa. on Nov 2, 2010 12:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

Agree with alot of what you said...

and you said it in such a nice way too! Well laid out and reasoned. It is a post like that that doesn’t necessarily change minds but really nicely brings two viewpoints together. Rec’d.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 2, 2010 10:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree with your major premise

but take issue with some of the major points.

McDaniels has proven that he has a great deal to learn on many fronts. Things such as the ongoing 12 men on the field penalties are inexcuseable and yet continue. Also, the first and second round draft picks are simply horrible. Play calling, first and fourth quarter impotence, and overall confusion on both sides of the ball are all coach-centric problems.

That being said, I agree that we should stay the course and improve with each game.

Excellent post. Rec’d.

It all starts in the trenches - HT 11/11/08
Leave the hateful vitriol to the uninformed - HT 3/16/09

by firstfan on Nov 1, 2010 12:59 PM MDT reply actions  

heh. Thanks bud.

I’m not sure we can grade his first-second rounders yet. Except for Phonz, he’s no longer a Bronco. I see potential and also some iffy calls. We’ll see how it plays out.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

I disagree with his 1st and 2nd draft picks being horrible

Knowshon is the perfect back for this system, he just hasn’t had a training camp and the O-line is just our oline.

Ayers is the perfect fit for a compliment to Doom. He just hasn’t played with him this year. He seals the edge, stifles the run, and is our 2nd best pass rusher. (DJ is 3rd I think)

Quinn is a flop, but I’ll excuse a second round bust because it was their first draft and the lack of time to prepare had to show up. He does have the makings to be Daniel Grams replacement if he’d just learn the f***in plays in the NFL!!!

Alphonzo Smith was the same thing, except I think he is like a less talented Deagelo Hall. He played a game that was different than what we wanted him to play and with all the expectations with us trading a 1st rounder to get him, it was a disaster waiting to happen. Smith was also graded by many to be a 1st rd corner, he just didn’t work for us. It happens.

Darcel McBeth would be great if he could just stop getting hurt!!! I think he transferred from Corner to Safety, so that had to slow him down in the learning curve, but when he’s here he has been very good.

Thomas was the best pick in a while, IMO. I forget who we traded to Miami, but he really wasn’t needed at all. Thomas is just what any QB in Denver could ever want. Now he just needs a bit more time to play the game.

Tebow….. ugh, that pick made me swear. It wasn’t where we picked him that bothered me. I was ok with that. it’s that we gave up a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th pick for it. I don’t see Tebow as worth it. I think he’ll be a top 10 quarterback given time, but that is also more of a gut feeling based on a bit of experience and not a scientific quote. He plays with the tenacity of Matthew Stafford, and I knew Stafford was gonna be the next savior of a bad town. So time will tell. I’m ok with it, except for what we gave up.

Zane Beadles is solid, though he has played 3-4 different positions in his first year. That says nothing but good stuff about him.

In all, 2 were busts and it wasn’t due to talent. Phonz just didn’t work for us and Quinn is a hated red-headed step-child of Denver because of his stone hands (and he doesn’t learn the f*ing plays in the NFL)

by David J. on Nov 1, 2010 3:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

darcel is a safety. Zane beadles and jd walton are nothing special. And phonz wouldv’e worked in our system. You are right when you say he didn’t work for us because we never gave him a full days work. Phonz never started nor was given more than a handful of plays. I still don’t understand why we got rid of him for cassius vaughn. And one more time just for sake phonz was a player that would fit in our scheme. Ayers is a good player but as far as choosing a player to be in a 3-4 there were better options. Knowshon isn’t perfect for our system stop drinking the koolaide. For you to say thomas was the best pick in a while makes you lose your credibility. I don’t mean to be a prick but so much of what your saying is purely optimistic and stupid. Just because you like a player doesn’t mean their good. Even if a player turns out to be very good still doesn’t mean it was a good pick. We got D Thomas in the 1st round and his presence on our team is not going to make an impact necessarily. hes a great player but for this year his presence on our team probably wont change the result of a single game for us. Hes almost always behind 3 players. Knowshonn moreno isn’t the perfect back though. So many things about aying that are just retarded. What were seeing from knowshon is probably gonna be as good as it gets. Even with a great line we cant expect a lot of yardage out of him only on rare occasion and against bad teams. And moreno drops passes and has trouble finding a hole in coverage when hes not running routes behind the line of scrimage. Hes not the runner or reciever we thought he was going to be and i assure you a training camp wont change this.

by Orange Kush on Nov 1, 2010 4:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

conversely just because you don't like a player

Doesn’t make it a bad pick. Drafts take time to yield their fruit.

Colinski posted earlier this week about the problem that “angle of repose” creates for building the roster, and it applies to this conversation in a way.

I say this a lot, but it is obviously difficult to understand, don’t get caught up in draft pick value. In the long run it doesn’t matter. What matters is the WHO of the pick, the individual player. I think a lot of the concern of whether or not a player is valuable coming down to where he was drafted (which sounds insane to me no matter how many times I hear it) comes from the intense parsing of draft data that comes during the dead times of the offseason. Fans become invested in their draft knowledge, ranking players against eachother and matching them to teams that they forget it is about individual players, and it instead becomes this big predictive numbers game. In ten years no one will care what pick was spent on a bust and which players came cheap. All that matters is a fair evaluation of the players.

The angle of repose problem I mentioned comes into play when considering just how MANY guys can even be drafted. Every draft the team has already gotten their 80 man rosters filled, and they simply can’t add any more without removing people. So for every rookie you draft, you want to get the best shot of making the team that you can. Piling up names, while a fun exercise during the days leading up to the christmas like atmosphere of the draft, it is useless for building a balanced 53 man roster.

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 4:34 PM MDT up reply actions   3 recs

I agree with the general point, but there I think you're forgetting one point.

“In ten years no one will care what pick was spent on a bust and which players came cheap.” This isn’t necessarily true. Ownership and management will care if they had to fork out a 100 million contract with a 20 million guaranteed signing bonus to the next JaMarcus Russell. There’s a reason teams who blow picks in the top 5 continue to suck. The salaries for those picks can severely hamper a team’s financial ability to spend on other needs, especially if you miss on top 5 picks 4 or 5 years in a row, and are on the hook for several of those salaries. Rookie wage scale, anyone?

- Nick

"Know the enemy, know yourself, and victory is never in doubt, not in a hundred battles."
- Sun Tzu

by ncm42 on Nov 1, 2010 5:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

I am more addressing

the trading and bartering of picks. For Instance, we had three picks available and spent them all on Tebow, so some fans get caught up in “3 picks is too many”, but it really is just about the player. By the time you factor in the UFAs, the late round contributers, the waiver wire pickups, and the high round picks, all that value evens out and all that will be left are player evaluations and how accurate they are. I am 100% on the side of a war room that picks the players it wants, and then targets them. Trading future picks doesn’t even bother me, because once you get a team built from the gound up with rookies you will eventually hit a year when the majority of your drafted players, even the good ones, might not make the team. In years like that it doesn’t hurt to only have 3 or four draft picks. Of course, if you have extra picks you may be able to stock up for later years when you actually will need to infuse young talent, but these ideal constructs for the draft are mostly theoretical in nature, and nearly impossible to realize except by dumb luck. There are just too many factors involved for any war room to be in total control.

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 6:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Agree wholeheartedly with this

but still think, in the ten year analysis, teams should remember if they blew early first round picks. Always learn from the big mistakes…

- Nick

"Know the enemy, know yourself, and victory is never in doubt, not in a hundred battles."
- Sun Tzu

by ncm42 on Nov 1, 2010 6:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Though you do have a dood point, upon some more reflection

One thing that bothers me is when someone says Moreno is no good because as a 12th, he should be doing more. I remember right after that draft people saying they would have been ok with it if it had been Moreno at 18 and Ayers at 12 instead. That just doesn’t make any sense to me. The team got the players they were after, what else matters? Only whether they are good or bad…. But like I said, good point that there are a handful of outliers in the draft that will make everyone think twice about their selection. Average or better probably won’t notice the difference much, but bust like JaMarcus will be unforgettable for exactly that reason…

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 6:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

We must have crossed lines...

I always think of the Lions. All those blown top 5 picks kept them reeling for YEARS. They’re only now starting to turn that corner…

- Nick

"Know the enemy, know yourself, and victory is never in doubt, not in a hundred battles."
- Sun Tzu

by ncm42 on Nov 1, 2010 6:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

JB

there is a clear difference between the way your brain works in concert with your keyboard.

you type a mean paragraph, and the logic inside is just top shelf.

i am consistently impressed that you so evenly refute some of the sophomoric comments posted here, and this is just another case of this.

well said, all around. Orange Kush, come on man.

"We let go of 32 players from 2008 (roster and practice squad) who were here who never played in the NFL again," Xanders said. "There's a plan in place. We're laying the foundation for success. And most of the decisions have been productive

by Jay Fin Anderson on Nov 1, 2010 6:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm working on the typos, lol

I picture these debates as chasms, with people on either side. I start by learning what I can of their side of the chasm, trying to see what they see that puts them over there in the first place. Sometimes I am quite happy to stay on my side, sometimes the gulf becomes wider, but I always recognize we are all trying to get to the same side eventually, somewhere where we and the Broncos are all celebrating super bowl wins.

The great part is that sometimes you find that you need to get over to the other side, and you need to develop trust with the guys over there, because when you eventually make the leap, you are counting on them to be there, or maybe even reach out over the gap in their own way to make sure you make it…

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 7:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

You sir, are a good human being.

at least on the interwebs. ;)

"We let go of 32 players from 2008 (roster and practice squad) who were here who never played in the NFL again," Xanders said. "There's a plan in place. We're laying the foundation for success. And most of the decisions have been productive

by Jay Fin Anderson on Nov 1, 2010 7:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

" – I remember right after that draft people saying they would have been ok with it if it had been Moreno at 18 and Ayers at 12 …"

Yes, I remember posting on that and It struck me as one of the more petty and silly critiques I’ve ever heard. And let me be clear — they wanted us to draft Ayers at #12 and Moreno at #18 but complained because we reversed the ordering to draft them. The complaint was made in a major football publication but I can recall which one.

I label these types of complaints under ‘expectations bias.’ It’s a form of criticism that postures as an aggrieved fan (etc.) who’s disappointed by a result that didn’t meet his or her expectations. The problem is with that person’s expectations, which rarely are well thought-out. In other cases, the posturing is merely a ploy to take advantage of a negative event by complaining about it in a way that puts others on the defensive. Generally, their motivation appears to be schadenfreude.

"the megalomaniac view of oneself as the Elect, wholly good, abominably persecuted, yet assured of ultimate triumph; the attribution of gigantic and demonic powers to the adversary; the refusal to accept the ineluctable limitations and imperfections of human existence, such as transience, dissention, conflict, fallibility whether intellectual or moral; the obsession with inerrable prophecies…systematized misinterpretations, always gross and often grotesque." – Norman Cohn - quoted in The Paranoid Style in American Politics

by Colinski on Nov 3, 2010 4:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

correction: "Can't recall which one.."

"the megalomaniac view of oneself as the Elect, wholly good, abominably persecuted, yet assured of ultimate triumph; the attribution of gigantic and demonic powers to the adversary; the refusal to accept the ineluctable limitations and imperfections of human existence, such as transience, dissention, conflict, fallibility whether intellectual or moral; the obsession with inerrable prophecies…systematized misinterpretations, always gross and often grotesque." – Norman Cohn - quoted in The Paranoid Style in American Politics

by Colinski on Nov 3, 2010 4:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ten years later? Tommy Maddox instead of Carl Pickens... still pissed!

http://www.centsports.com/ref/698077/Joe_Vick

If you think you know sports, try betting here for free.
I'm up to 3 dollars!

by Whidbey Bronco on Nov 1, 2010 5:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

some of your comments are overly negative and short-sighted.

first, it’s far too soon to judge beadles and walton. in a perfect situation NFL teams don’t want rookie OL’s to see the field at all because the learning curve is so great. they are both rookies who had to start from game 1. Clady is the exception, NOT the rule. Also, clady was able to succeed as a rookie because he was surrounded by veterans who were playing at a high level (the zone-blocking scheme allowed the veterans to mask some of his deficiencies against the run) and was tasked to defend a VERY mobile QB — not a luxuries that this year’s OL has.

While we’re on the subject of the OL. this is an excellent time to look at the moreno situation. moreno himself has noot looked terrible when he’s healthy, but he has had no where to run. last year he was running behind a transitioning line manned by players who were both past their prime and not a good fit (physically) for the system McD was int he process of transitioning the team into running. this is not a good situation for a rookie RB. Now the players are right (or at least closer to right) for the system, but the 3 returning veterans who were supposed to start are all coming off of injuries and we have 2 rookies starting. the line is not healthy and is inexperienced. Still a terrible situation for a RB. until we can create a favorable running situation for moreno, I don’t really think it’s fair to declare him a failure/bust. We don’t really know what we have there.

As for Thomas, he’s a good young player who shows a lot of potential. btw, he is second among rookies with 2 TD receptions (bryant has 3). so i’m not so sure what kind of bigger impact you were looking for from thomas.

also, please try to stay away from the name calling. that’s not what MHR is about.

by bailey disciple on Nov 1, 2010 4:44 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

hmmm
don’t mean to be a prick but so much of what your saying is purely optimistic and stupid.

you should attempt to be more intentional.

"We let go of 32 players from 2008 (roster and practice squad) who were here who never played in the NFL again," Xanders said. "There's a plan in place. We're laying the foundation for success. And most of the decisions have been productive

by Jay Fin Anderson on Nov 1, 2010 6:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

hahaha well said.

"We let go of 32 players from 2008 (roster and practice squad) who were here who never played in the NFL again," Xanders said. "There's a plan in place. We're laying the foundation for success. And most of the decisions have been productive

by Jay Fin Anderson on Nov 1, 2010 6:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

added thought

I thought the complaint about our trading down so we could select Thomas & Tebow was off-base, too.

The mathematical point that I’ve tried repeatedly to get across is there’s a limit to how many players you can add. The desire to use as many picks as possible in a BPA strategy tends to run aground on roster limits. Lots of picks means lots of attrition elsewhere, and that doesn’t necessarily reduce wastage.

What’s lost on people who penny-pinch BPA points is rosters aren’t collections of talent acquired in a willy nilly fashion. Well chosen picks have a much better chance of making a roster and contributing even though their draft value chart value may be less. Fans have become entranced with DVC values under the mistaken belief that those values are fungible — they’re often not.

"the megalomaniac view of oneself as the Elect, wholly good, abominably persecuted, yet assured of ultimate triumph; the attribution of gigantic and demonic powers to the adversary; the refusal to accept the ineluctable limitations and imperfections of human existence, such as transience, dissention, conflict, fallibility whether intellectual or moral; the obsession with inerrable prophecies…systematized misinterpretations, always gross and often grotesque." – Norman Cohn - quoted in The Paranoid Style in American Politics

by Colinski on Nov 3, 2010 5:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

Right on, FF

The mistakes across the board are, to me, on the coach. That is why I am totally okay with benching guys who consistently make mistakes (see Hillis and Quinn, for example). But the mistakes absolutely have to stop one way our another.

The draft I can stomach. The first one was done with little lead time, and we will have to see how this year’s guys pan out…

But, if this team is making these kinds of mistakes (penalties, turnovers, ST gaffes, etc.) at the end of the year, Bowlen has got to bring in at least a mentor for McD. This team has everything it takes to win, I think, except execution.

You cannot win in the NFL making this many mistakes. Period.

by jonahsilas on Nov 1, 2010 3:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

"The mistakes across the board are, to me, on the coach"

I agree, and I also wonder why? I probably never will know the whole story about Smith. Some of the players have said he was stubborn and not getting with the program, but players tend to back their coach. What sticks in my mind is a comment by one of the DP writers that Smith appeared to be playing scared, looking over his shoulder and waiting for something bad to happen. That could in fact describe the whole team. With a good team different players step up each game and make big plays. With a bad team different players make bonehead plays to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Is fear of getting screamed at on the practice field (McDaniels is the anti-Dungy in that respect) a prelude to playing scared on gameday? Is that why this team falls apart after a bad play or a bad game? When even veterans make inexplicable mental errors (Orton not protecting the ball when he knows someone is going to catch him from behind) it makes you wonder. When the wheels fall off of our heretofore solid kicking game it makes you wonder. This is a team that regularly manages to find a way to lose. I’m not for giving up on McDaniels prematurely. I don’t want him to become Bowlen’s Alphonso Smith. I hope that he, along with his draft picks, is able to develop the potential he appears to have.

"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.

by spock on Nov 1, 2010 5:19 PM MDT up reply actions   2 recs

Sorry man, not logical.

Orton’s fumble, Colquitt’s punts Prater’s shank et all can in no way be tied to coaching. Yes many aspects of this teams results can be but let’s not go too far over the edge.

"as in football so in life"

by asinsoin on Nov 1, 2010 5:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

It sure can be tied to coaching

If the coach’s idea of leading the team is to yell at them in the “win the MF game” manner because he doesn’t know any other way to properly motivate his players, then I can see said players playing not to make a mistake, as opposed to playing to win.

by zoltek99 on Nov 1, 2010 9:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

So you're saying that...

When a coach tells the team to “win the mother f___ing game” that it will motivate his players to do something other than play to win?

I’m confused.

by chripstopher on Nov 2, 2010 4:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not really

I’m saying that his motivational skills, at least from what I’ve seen and heard, revolve solely around yelling at his players like they are children. And, subsequently, he’s got them playing to not lose, as opposed to win.

Sure, there is always a time and place for yelling, but when you are either A) yelling “win the MF game” or B) standing forlornly on the sidelines picking your fingernails with a look of what else can I do…I just think McD still has much to learn about “constructive criticism” is the best way I can put it.

by zoltek99 on Nov 3, 2010 12:34 AM MDT up reply actions  

problems with your thesis

I don’t reject the idea that there’s a fear by players of making mistakes that may be related to their relationship with McDaniels but that dynamic is nearly always evident through signs of stress and a poor relationship between coach and players — which is missing. In fact, the players all (with some now-departed exceptions) like McDaniels a LOT. The type of psychological dynamic you’re describing is found with a hard driving disciplinarian who demands too much from his players.

I can accept the theory that the complexity of our schemes has put a burden on players that results in mistakes. And I expect that when players struggle it shows up as a fear of making mistakes. We can simplify things but it reduces our strategic advantage, so the question is finding the right level. It’s always going to require more knowledge than other schemes though.

What’s important to realize about this COMPLEXITY syndrome I’ve theorized is that high roster turnover exacerbates these problems. Injuries are therefore a disability in that they rob us of good players but they’re an added disability in that we’re scrambling to keep everyone on the same page who is playing a new position (or starting after being a reserve). My theory offers a purely cognitive explanation whereas most others use a caricatured version of leadership/teaching. From my own experience — teachers can do a wonderful job of teaching but students don’t always learn. Rarely do observers blame the student but it’s the more common problem.

"the megalomaniac view of oneself as the Elect, wholly good, abominably persecuted, yet assured of ultimate triumph; the attribution of gigantic and demonic powers to the adversary; the refusal to accept the ineluctable limitations and imperfections of human existence, such as transience, dissention, conflict, fallibility whether intellectual or moral; the obsession with inerrable prophecies…systematized misinterpretations, always gross and often grotesque." – Norman Cohn - quoted in The Paranoid Style in American Politics

by Colinski on Nov 3, 2010 5:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

Funny you should write that

Just today Peter King wrote about Campbell saying Tom Cable give an impassioned speech about not worrying about mistakes and playing with abandon – right before they ripped into us and then the Sea Chickens. I am not seeing that from the Broncos right now.

I do think the players bear some responsibility, but I lean your way that guys seem to be playing not to lose – a lot of overthinking and analyzing out there, perhaps. Hopefully this playbook just needs a little time to percolate…

by jonahsilas on Nov 1, 2010 5:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

And then there was the rumor (insider info ostensibly) that Gary Miller floated

(And I don’t consider Gary Miller to be a rumormonger who does this stuff for fun or his career) which was that after the Jets game, McD ripped the team too hard. Now, I don’t have a lot of sympathy in that situation, but I can understand that if you felt that the refs screwed you on a play, and then the coach, who normally was considered someone who “gets the players”, insists on “giving you the line” about your mistakes, then the players might feel put out. Again, I’m not sympathetic, and hugs aren’t really the answer either.

By the next game, Beadles was starting over Harris, which I couldn’t believe at the time. The only thing that made sense was injury to me, because I grade the OL every game, and despite slow improvements in technique and consistency, they are directly responsible for numerous miscommunications, errors and missed blocks every week. However, Harris looked better than Beadles did, even if ever so slightly. However rumors at the time said it was a demotion, and lo and behold, we see harris getting situational reps in the game, looking plenty healthy, so teh rumors are pretty much confirmed.

Which brings up yet another point. That OL had to have been getting tired of being ripped a new one EVERY week, whether they deserved it or not, so maybe the confluence of events just sort of demoralized guys like Clady, Kuper and Graham? What if the newer rumors are right and Harris being benched because he isn’t enough of an improvement over Beadles to overlook Harris injury history and coming free agent status. Seems unlikely, but even if some players only suspected this (in minds tilled by their own self-doubt in their struggles and fertilized with McD’s ire at their inconsistency) it could have them in all sorts of mixed up emotional states.

A narrative with some staying power is coming to light, i think, and I am compelled to point out that McD’s sideline demeanor is significantly changed over the last two weeks. the fist pumps and “good games” are still there, but the swearing is gone (or imperceptible except to the booth guys). At the rate he was going, i think the wife might have got involved as well, if you know what I mean, and maybe even a sense of pride. It was cool when the NFL was tripping over themselves to censor him, but I think he must know now that there are other ways to communicate.

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 6:58 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

The concerning nature of that Jets rumor

is that if he does lose the locker room (which it is far from being at this point), then that would trump all other items.
No matter what happens from here on out, not losing the locker room is his biggest challenge, and it will surely be a challenge

by The Ds on Nov 1, 2010 7:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

Absolutely

I have a post scheduled for next week where I talk about exactly that point, keeping the team together to finish this thing out.

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 7:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

He has been excellent at recruiting Free agents. Many of these guys are veteran players who have had great coaches in their past. Players have come to his defense within the media (such as Haggan recently).

Thus, I am optimistic that he will hold the locker room together. However, this is certainly the most concerning thing, and his inexperience as a coach works against him in this regard.

by The Ds on Nov 1, 2010 7:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

Haggan's speach to the media

the other day saying “it’s not Josh, I’ve never been more prepared for a football game my whole life” was very very reassuring!

daaayuuuuum! you gonna take that KB?!? lol -Broncs55
Absolutely not. KB is a function of aggression and rage, the derivative of which can be traced back to my childhood.-KentuckyBronco
PS3 ID: KoRnHo|ed

by Broncs55 on Nov 1, 2010 7:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not to me

when in so many ways the team seems not to be prepared. Maybe they’re over-prepared. We keep hearing how long it takes players to master his very complex system. Maybe it should be less complex. Maybe the players have too much on their plate as they prepare for each game, and are overthinking on the field during the game. As for Haggan’s remark, that is standard player defending his coach speak.

"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.

by spock on Nov 1, 2010 7:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

I have heard this before

not from this regime, but a coaching mantra is “Don’t give them more information than they can use.”

Since his father is a highschool coach, I would guess he is versed in being cognizant of these limitations. I remember an article some time ago (Peter King?) where they were in an OL meeting, and Hochstein wanted McD to have the rookies accomodate some defensive tactic with some exotic trap or something, and McD basically told him, “Not yet. What you are talking about is 400 level calculus and these guys are still on Basic Algebra.”

But when the losses are stacking up, the first impulse could be too expand the opponent scouting, try to get more “edges” over the opponent, and end up bogging players down in the details. However, i would guess that isn’t the case….

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 7:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

looking forward to reading it Jeremy

You are one of the contributers I really look forward to week in and week out.

daaayuuuuum! you gonna take that KB?!? lol -Broncs55
Absolutely not. KB is a function of aggression and rage, the derivative of which can be traced back to my childhood.-KentuckyBronco
PS3 ID: KoRnHo|ed

by Broncs55 on Nov 1, 2010 7:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don't believe the swearing is gone for a moment

I have never heard a coach not swear at their players when mad

Heck, I got my butt kicked by a coach once for a move I did on a teammate – although I did it to opponents all the time and it was second nature and not even seen by ref’s – which is why I was always in the backfield at the time.

daaayuuuuum! you gonna take that KB?!? lol -Broncs55
Absolutely not. KB is a function of aggression and rage, the derivative of which can be traced back to my childhood.-KentuckyBronco
PS3 ID: KoRnHo|ed

by Broncs55 on Nov 1, 2010 7:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

We All

have a lot to learn. I’ve studied football all my life, whether it be playing it, broadcasting it on the radio or watching film. Nevertheless, everytime I watch NFL Playbook, I learn a great deal from the masters themselves, Brian Billick, Solomon Wilcots, Mike Mayock and Sterling Sharpe. We still have the chance for success this season but we’ll see what happens

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Nov 1, 2010 3:44 PM MDT up reply actions  

Nice, Tim

Something I was happy to see for a momentary diversion here in the office.

Two things struck me: (1) saying this rather starkly “wholly lacked any experience within their new positions.” is a good reset to remember where these guys started from, and (2) I’m far removed from the KOA’s, KUSA’s and whatever there beats the airwaves with Broncomania, but it would seem a good time for Pat Bowlen to come out and publicly support his guys, and the direction he perceives things to be headed.

by MakeCents on Nov 1, 2010 1:00 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks!

I disagree about the public statement of support. Many times, that is what owners do just before they fire people…it would create a media firestorm. Bowlen’s silence, to me, is more telling than anything right now.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

See your point

I was perhaps thinking of granting an interview (no doubt there are countless requests) rather than making some unilateral statement. But you’re right, Bowlen has established that the in-season focus be on the football guys, and I wouldn’t expect that to change.

by MakeCents on Nov 1, 2010 1:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

A serious question...

I heard this awhile back and I was wondering if anyone can confirm its validity. I had heard something about Bowlen starting to lose some of his memory, notably including from the two Super Bowl wins.

Is this true? Has he been showing signs of dementia?

(Really. I’m being serious. Not trying to joke).

by zoltek99 on Nov 1, 2010 9:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

It's rumor and heresay.

I am not going to participate in that kind of stuff…at least not about someone’s personal mental health.

Until an official announcement is made, its pointless speculation. Unless one’s goal is to discredit the McDaniels hiring…

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 9:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

Just curious, no real intention

Sure, I suppose it can be called in to question his decision making ability…but I was really just curious. And more so…curious if any other owners in the league, in their advancing age, have become less fit to run their respective team and how that issue was approached by their staff.

Regardless, like I said, just curious.

by zoltek99 on Nov 1, 2010 9:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Whats her name with the Rams

Was pretty much forced out for getting out of hand with her public statements. Not sure if that was age related or rich related?

Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Don’t worry about it. As an ignorant redneck, I’m qualified to say that.

by Sean in Pa. on Nov 2, 2010 12:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

There were many of us

that agreed with you but it was in August when we thought it. People called me a pessimist, and other not so nice things when I said I did not think we would even win 8 games this year. I did not know it would be THIS bad however.

While I do agree we have found some decent talent in the last 2 years, I think it is just that decent. We need more than decent. We need great players. I see 3 so far out of the last 2 years. (McBath, Ayers, Thomas). I almost put Walton in there but not yet. Other than that, the players we have are tier 2 starters or decent backups. opps I forgot about Cox. Make that 4 great players for the future. (I think it has to rank up there as one of the better late round picks at least as it looks so far). I am sure I have overlooked someone but you get the drift. There are making strides in this area faster than was happening before.

If it were not for the Money, I would say start over and I did vote for start over but in reality, We have to give them a chance. I for one wonder about the psyche of this team with a coach who will pull you out and MF you to death if you make a mistake and you may never see the field again (look at Hillis and his fumbles and Quinn lining up wrong) Players will not go for that for very much longer IMO.

by kimbertr on Nov 1, 2010 1:10 PM MDT reply actions  

funny thought on your last paragraph...

what would McD have done with Elway? Would McD have taken him out of the game and kept him out because he lined up under guard? That thought just kind of made me laugh…there is NO way he would have done that to Elway right? Maybe McD would have not pulled the trigger on the trade that brought a bratty cocky guy like Elway, who didn’t want to play for the team that drafted him, to the Broncos. Can you imagine?

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

They are both coaches sons...

they probably would have worked well together.

by sjkingii on Nov 1, 2010 2:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

yep

Elways refusal was a principled stand, not a tantrum, and a lot of it came from the respect Elway had for his dad. They would have had that in common, no doubt.

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 4:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Great?

Thomas? no, unproven is more like it
McBath? Hurt, solid when not
Ayers? No even close to great

by Clompy on Nov 1, 2010 2:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

ayers has been really good this year when healthy and is definitely one of the bright spots.

when he and doom are both healthy, i think you’ll be surprised just how well he plays

by bailey disciple on Nov 1, 2010 4:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

Clomby, I agree

I think there is an inclination that many fans have to interpret “serviceable” as “Great”. I have found all those players named to be serviceable. Some barely so. I haven’t seen anything that remotely looks like great.

by BroncoMarc on Nov 1, 2010 7:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree

It’s all relative. We think they are great simply because they are better than the other players on our team by a noticeable difference.

My two cents:

I can see Thomas being the next Brandon Marshall. I can also see Thomas being the next Ashley Lelie, or even Darius Watts (there have already been some tough-to-catch balls that you feel like a truly great WR would snag).
I think Ayers can be a D.J. Williams caliber player.
I have seen very little from McBath for me to be at all impressed by him.
I think Cox will be as good as Darrent Williams, but not better (than again, I feel the least certain here…as he is only a rookie, and I think he certainly has the chance to become great).

by zoltek99 on Nov 1, 2010 9:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

serviceable across the board

DJ, the pure definition of serviceable. can anyone name a game changing or winning play in DJ’s career? i.e. forced fumble or interception. w/o much thought I can think of 4 by Mecklenburg

by Clompy on Nov 2, 2010 7:39 AM MDT up reply actions  

His goalline stand against Baltimore was a game changing play. we did not come close to winning the game, but that play was a game changer play.

DJ has been playing his best football of his career, he is hardly a problem right now and is something positive to build on for the future

by The Ds on Nov 2, 2010 8:24 AM MDT up reply actions  

cause you would be great switching jobs every year right?

I mean you only need one year to impact your position and then move on.

Same old tired debate about DJ being just good- Guy is head and Shoulders above 85% of the Defensive players.

Give me 5 guys you would start ahead of DJ Williams cause I can only give you 2

Ray Lewis Patrick Willis and just so you know I would put David Hsrris alongside DJ and Love this LB Corps!

There is what we need to look at Doom DJ Harris and Ayers as a Starting LB corps!

Make it Happen Boss Man!

Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!

"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown

by Jon Tollerud on Nov 2, 2010 11:36 AM MDT up reply actions  

perfect argument

I’m with you, however why was he asked to switch? Was Lewis ever asked? NO ’cause he is great.

by Clompy on Nov 2, 2010 2:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ok

2005 Came in a a WSLB and looked great
2006 Ian Gold is signed and he is asked to switch to SSLB because Gold prefers to play WLB
2007 Al Wilson is cut and the only guy we have that can remotely cover the middle is DJ
2008 Nate Web…web…web frack the incredible flying helmet is our MLB because he CAN’T cover TE’s or Blitz very well
2009 Scheme change from 4-3 to 3-4 so he moves to ILB but more of a roamer and zone player
2010 becomes the RILB he was supposed to be in 2009 but with davis here was unable to actually play the position due to davis’ short field range.

Dear Santa- All I want for Christmas is a Stud NT and David Harris- Thank you!

Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!

"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown

by Jon Tollerud on Nov 2, 2010 8:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I got ripped for predicting 7-9. I remember being told that I just didn’t understand football, or that I was a hater, since I was blind to the brilliant way this team was being built. As it turned out, my prediction now looks to be over optimistic.

by BroncoMarc on Nov 1, 2010 7:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

Me too brother

Me too.

When I questioned what the team was doing when Phonz was traded I was told McDaniels was a genius. I swore off this site for a few months.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 8:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

Great, so what?

Okay, so you were right. Big whoop. Does that make the Broncos a better team because you were right.

P.S. I’m only a relatively new poster here and wasn’t one of the individuals who called you a hater. I’m just saying, it’s not conducive to say, “See, I’m right that the Broncos were going to suck more than everyone else thought they were”.

P.P.S. In writing this post I realize I’m just venting out of frustration. My apologies. Nothing personal.

by zoltek99 on Nov 1, 2010 9:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

Great Tim

However what concerns me is that since the coach and GM are so young, are the qualified enough to know what a good foundation is and what is not.

From you quotes of Xander, I sure hope they do know,becasue if they are going down the wrong path it can take years to undo.

by broncos314 on Nov 1, 2010 1:11 PM MDT reply actions  

Well thought-out letter Tim

I agree with the major premise…give McD more time…but the question is how do you measure improvement?

I want to see this team get better and this year I’ve been watching them get worse. Josh needs to do something quick to get some Ws on the board. I don’t care what it is, but completely “staying the course” isn’t kosher to me. Let the OC call plays, bring in a consultant, switch QBs…do something that makes the most sense (which I’m not qualified to say what we should do…I’m not a coach..I just don’t want status-quo).

"Bombs dropping down overhead. Underground. It's instilled to want to live." -EV

by sadaraine on Nov 1, 2010 1:13 PM MDT reply actions  

I apologize for not being concise

Stay the course with McD and Xanders

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

sadaraine

You said in two sentences what took me a paragraph.

Great work Tim.

It all starts in the trenches - HT 11/11/08
Leave the hateful vitriol to the uninformed - HT 3/16/09

by firstfan on Nov 1, 2010 5:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

"the question is how do you measure improvement?"

Er, games won and lost?

"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.

by spock on Nov 1, 2010 5:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yes, I think Josh needs to do something

but swtching quarterbacks or letting the OC call plays won’t solve the problem of a team playing without confidence and making bonehead mistakes at critical times, which I think is the real problem that has led to in-season and in-games collapses.

"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.

by spock on Nov 1, 2010 5:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

And

may not know they are going down the wrong path because of their youth. I feel at this point it would have been prudent of Bowlen to have a mix of youth and experience ie experienced GM and youthful coach. Just my opinion at this point.

by broncos314 on Nov 1, 2010 1:13 PM MDT reply actions  

Unbelievable article

Fantastic work Tim, I agree with everything written here.

This is certainly the low point of the season.
It is tough to remember how well we played against the Jets, hopefully this bye week will be a refresher of sorts and some players will get healthy (like Goodman, who clearly was playing with half a leg).

Any sort of improvement and sign of life would be a welcome change at this point, the rest of this season will be very interesting to watch unfold.

by DW76 on Nov 1, 2010 1:19 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks!

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Wow.

IF I didnt know better I wouldve thought you were still blaming Shannahan for this mess. The fact is Shannahan left major pieces of the puzzle for Mcd to both build around and trade for assets. I’m not going to defend all his drafts because I dont think they were that great either, but 2009 was a major cluster bleep of a draft. I just dont think you can sugar coat that anyway but to admit it was. The trades have left a lot to be desired as well. 2010 looks promising but its still very early.

You know, everyone talks about the 32 players let go. From 2000-2008 Matt Millen made 66 picks. 11 players remain on the Detroit roster and 6 were from 2008. That is called leaving the cupboard bare. Royal, CLady, Doom, DJ, Champ, BMarsh were all luxuries that MCD had coming in. Thats a solid core if you ask me.

Look man, I like your work, but i really think this letter shifts blame from where the major faults are instead of tackling the problems dead on. This team was never going to be that great this year.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 1:20 PM MDT reply actions  

I never shifted blame, I only stated McX needs more time to fix the problems Shanny left this organization.

I challenge you to go back to 2000-2005 drafts and find how many of Shanny’s draft picks were on the roster in his final season. I’ll give Shanny his 2006-2008 picks, as I am sure many of Millens picks were still on the roster in 2008 from his 2006-2008 drafts. Btw, I can only think of one guy Shanny drafted pre-2005 that was still on the roster in 2009. DJ Williams.

I am not sugar coating the failures of McX thus far to turn this organization around, I’m just not ready to discard them. I see the light at the end of this tunnel and I wanted to share it with everyone.

However, perception is everything. This article is certainly my perception of the facts. We don’t have to agree. :)

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:27 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

no youre right

We dont have to agree. The one thing with Shanny is he always got the most out of his players. That is one area where MCDaniels have failed so far.

I purposely didnt vote on whether to stay the course or not. On one hand I believe in continuity and the concept of it, on the other hand I have serious question on the teams ability to evaluate talent and have had it since the beginning. For some reason I just cant shake the notion that MCd is Brian Billick 2.0

And I applaud you for putting this out there. Its going to create a ton of discussion which is good. Sorry if I came across as attacking.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 1:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

In context, Shanny had 14 years experience to get the most of his crappy team.

McD has had 18 months. I am more prone to see McD has Bellicheck 2.0 – I just hope the Broncos are not the Browns and fire McD only to see him move on to build a dynasty elsewhere.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

We would be so lucky

If MCD turned out to be nearly as good as Shanny is as an X’s and O’s coach. I seriously think Shanny was the best X’s and O’s coach there was. Thats why Denver was the only team to have a winning record against Belichek when NE was at his highest.

I guess I have to ask, are you prepared to wait out the learning curve of McD if you think he is going to be that great? DO you not think anyone else could come in be just as qualified sooner?

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think Shanny may get more credit than he deserves.

It is looking more and more like Kubiak might have been the genius…things went to shit after he left.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think we have fundamental differences

On how we view football and this team which is fine. We’re both Bronco fans at the end of the day.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 2:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

and maybe...McD wasn't the real genius behind the Pats offense all these years...

They seem to just keep humming along. Even when they are “rebuilding”. Yes…Kubes deserves a lot of credit, but it was still Shanny’s offense.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 2:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

Pats know how to build a team from 1 to 53. Which helps

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 2:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

Got a third round pick for Moss

It all starts in the trenches - HT 11/11/08
Leave the hateful vitriol to the uninformed - HT 3/16/09

by firstfan on Nov 1, 2010 5:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

I was thinking that too

Yesterday as I watched a bit of the game. What if most of it was the system which was already in place before MCD took over the OC position.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 2:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

You mean

The same system he’s trying to install in Denver so that in the future we can just plug players in and keep on humming along?

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 2:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

yes...the same system that

got Mangeni, Crennel, and Charlie Weiss where they are currently today. Yes…that is the system we want in Denver.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 2:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah...or it just be that they have a Hall of Fame Coach and QB

still not completely sold on the system.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 2:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

Let's also remember

Shanahan in his first 20 games went 7-9 and 1-3 and was fired 4 games into his second year. It takes time to master the art of being a head coach.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Nov 1, 2010 3:46 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

I haven't

I’m aware that sometimes coaches fail in their first gig and then succeed on their second try thanks to the experience gained. One of my fears is seeing McDaniels (like Phonz?!) going somewhere else and flourishing, like both Shanahan and Belichick did their second time around.

"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.

by spock on Nov 1, 2010 5:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

i think bowlen is patient enough for things to work out.

also, it’s clear McD has a long term plan. I personally believe that the reason he got the job is because he pitched a good long-term rebuilding plan to bowlen.

by bailey disciple on Nov 1, 2010 8:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

I used to think so...

I used to think McD had a long-term plan. Now I see him on the sidelines, his team’s mental attitude in shambles and he’s picking at his fingernails with a “what the hell do I do now” look on his face.

I think it is far from clear that he has a long term plan.

With that said, having FINALLY resigned myself to the Broncos’ suckitide, I say give him this year and next to prove himself. You are going to suck anyways…why not let the rebuilding continue on with this coach as opposed to finding a new guy (which will be a lot tougher now that the Broncos coaching job isn’t as desired) and starting from scratch again.

by zoltek99 on Nov 1, 2010 9:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

right!

http://www.centsports.com/ref/698077/Joe_Vick

If you think you know sports, try betting here for free.
I'm up to 3 dollars!

by Whidbey Bronco on Nov 1, 2010 6:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

Get off Shanny already. Let's focus on McX fixing their own problems!

I have the same lack of respect for the Shanny bashing as for the McDumbass-dumbass remarks… This is a new team and the good fans will stand behind McX for another year if some improvements become evident to any degree this year…

http://www.centsports.com/ref/698077/Joe_Vick

If you think you know sports, try betting here for free.
I'm up to 3 dollars!

by Whidbey Bronco on Nov 1, 2010 6:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

2009 draft are you kidding me? McX are on the job for what 3 months? Then have to draft players to fit in on a team that they haven’t even seen play. While cutting a ton of players who had no business being on an NFL roster. What do you want? I’d say 6 players far outweigh 32 players that had to be released.

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 1:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

stop..

Tampa, Detroit and the Jets had no problem drafting. Why do we continue to make excuses for the failures of that draft?

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 1:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

So

Tampa, Detroit and the Jets hit on every one of their picks in 2009?

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 1:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Do you seriously believe 2009 was a good draft?

Or are you playing devils advocate? No one outside of DEnver will ever say 2009 was a great draft.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t think its fair to say it was a terrible draft. Im not saying they didn’t make mistakes tell me how was it such a bad draft?

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 1:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

ok

Gonna give you the quick version

Moreno – shown me nothing so far, jury is out IMO
Ayers – solid if upspectacular, I think he could be good though
Smith- already gone, thats too say nothing about the price paid
McBath- no idea on him, I’m open as of right now
Quinn
cant even dress
Bruton- special teamer
Olsen – GONE
Brandstrater – GONE
Schlueter – GONE
McKinley – RIP

3 possible starters out of 10? For a rebuilding team and a new head coach coming in with his system, his players thats terrible. 5 – 2nd round picks?

thats not even including the draft picks use from this years draft to move up and select these players?

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 1:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

not sure how I crossed those players out

computer error

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 1:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

Your definitely right in saying that the 2009 draft was nothing spectacular or even close to it.
However the 2010 draft would appear to already be a major majopr improvement, and for that reason I am fine with letting this regime have another draft. If 2011 is more like 2009 than 2010, then this team will have some trouble down the road.

However if they have another draft similar to 2010, the roster will start to look very nice

by The Ds on Nov 1, 2010 1:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

Moreno- What other runningback would be doing better when the o line can’t block?
Ayers- Has only started this season not a fair sample size in my opinion and has looked like a great run stopper.
Smith- A mistake, didn’t fit with what the Broncos were doing. But seems to me hes quite talented and doing pretty good in Detroit as everyone reminds us on here.
Mcbath- In the opportunities he has gotten has only shown promise.
Quinn- Didn’t work out. Maybe Marquez Branson would have filled that void but got hurt. Missed on him
Bruton- Special Teamer thats fine with me. One of our best special teams players.
Then the other late late round picks that are no longer with the team. Who told everyone that players picked in the 6th and 7th round have to become pro bowlers. You take whoever you think could have the best shot of cracking your roster.

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

yes, but there is more

You trade a 5th from this year to go get Brandstrater and you drop him that fast. Its that impulsiveness that worries me. Ditto Smith

Once again, I dont think Moreno will ever be a great back and certainly not worthy of being the 11th pick in the draft.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sorry 12th pick.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

Things Change

I never said it was perfect. 3 months to prepare is all im saying. No idea what the team on the field will look like. They thought those guys would fit in and they didn’t. Would you rather they sit on their hands and not actively try to make the team better.

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 2:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

But if you don't have time to prepare....

….and cannot evaluate the players, then why trade a future first round pick for a second round pick? Why trade up to get Quinn. Why trade future pick for Bradstater? If you do not evaluate the other players in the draft, then how do you know their worth? That has always been my issue with the 2009 draft. Fine, use the excuse that 3 months wasn’t enough time, then don’t make trades during the draft to move up.

"Pain don't hurt" - Swayze (Road House) -- We miss you man!

by bonaire on Nov 1, 2010 2:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thats who they felt best about

In Hindsight they weren’t good moves. I’d rather be active in the draft then just sit and hope the player you want falls in your lap

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 3:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree in a normal draft...

….with time to prepare. But if you don’t know the worth of the players drafted around the player you want, then you really don’t know the worth of the player you want. That is why I would have preferred they took a more conservative approach….but it’s water under the bridge at this point.

"Pain don't hurt" - Swayze (Road House) -- We miss you man!

by bonaire on Nov 1, 2010 3:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

also on ayers

remember we haven’t seen him start at OLB opposite Dumervil.

I have a feeling he’ll look a lot better against the pass when dumervil draws all the double-teams.

and agree— he’s been very solid against the run.

by bailey disciple on Nov 1, 2010 4:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

Answer to your question

“Moreno- What other runningback would be doing better when the o line can’t block?”

Frank Gore, Steven Jackson…that’s at least two who would run remarkably well in our system.

by zoltek99 on Nov 1, 2010 9:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

Jackson...24 carries for 53 yards this week.

SF rushing OL is far superior to its pass protection. IMO anyways.

Moreno’s problem is he can’t stay healthy.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 10:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

Moreno's problem is...

He runs too small to be a put-your-head down and push the pile forward RB. He runs too big to separate from tacklers. I do like his acrobatic leaps though…I’m not faulting him for trying. His effort is probably the best on the team. Not sure he’s ever going to be a franchise back though.

BTW, Jackson: Last 3 weeks – 25 for 114, 29 for 109, 22 for 110. Plus 1000yds+ rusher on one of the worst teams in the league the last decade. And the defenses KNOW he’s coming and they bruise the hell out of him…and he keeps coming.

by zoltek99 on Nov 1, 2010 11:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

JAckson

2 pins in his fingers.Probably shouldnt have played.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 2, 2010 7:21 AM MDT up reply actions  

I say the 2009 draft was solid.

Not every draft has to be best ever. Look at Shanny’s drafts from 2000-2005 and tell me 2009 isn’t better than almost every one of those other drafts.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

He

made a mistake in 09, though, when taking Moreno first. Not that Moreno is bad, it is just that he knew he was going to retool the O-Line to make it a power scheme. Why draft an RB first? He should have drafted Ayers at 12, then traded down with the pick they got for Cutler and taken C Alex Mack. Then, with the pick acquired from Pittsburgh at the end of the second, he should have drafted G Louis Vasquez instead of Richard Quinn. He also should have given Hillis more of a chance to run the rock.

by PABroncofan on Nov 1, 2010 2:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ayers 12?

you must be joking…..

by Clompy on Nov 1, 2010 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

People get too hung up on a players draft position.

If he works out, who cares. I would have taken Ray Lewis #1 overall back in ’96 if I had hindsight as my weapon.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

on the contrary

draft position equals monies spent by the owner and job security or lack there of, for GM’s and coaches

by Clompy on Nov 2, 2010 7:59 AM MDT up reply actions  

I believe in value

Not spending a 1st on interior lineman, kickers or RB’s.

Rb’s I’ll make an exception if you’re getting an AP. But guys like Spiller, Moreno, Beanie Wells – you can get those type of players in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, sometimes even undrafted.

I bet the washout rate on 1st round RB’s is as high as any other position. QB’s just get all the headlines.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 2, 2010 8:04 AM MDT up reply actions  

3rd of 7 drafts

I’d take 2000 as easily the best of those drafts, plenty of solid depth with Gold/O’Neal/Carlisle/Anderson/Kennedy. 2002 is probably 2nd just for Portis, easily best player out of any of those drafts. 2009 next; Ayers is looking like a solid not-flashy starter, Quinn/Smith did not work out at all and after 21 games Moreno has not should me anything more than 3rd down back potential.

After that the drafts get ugly. 2003 was a nightmare.

by deflated on Nov 1, 2010 4:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

You nailed it Jstar.... But what do they have in common?

Here’s a hint QB, QB, QB. Here’s a thought exercise. Put the contents of this post together. What made Shanny a great coach? Sorry it wasn’t Kubes , it was the guy on the field making the plays. Now imagine Elway (even a young Elway ) on the current team.seriously if he could make the three amigos potent imagine what a great qb would do with our current WR group. We would be 6-2, 5-3 at worst. This is a QB driven league and will remain so because that’s the nature of this game. IMO Josh knows this, hence the Tebow pick.

"as in football so in life"

by asinsoin on Nov 1, 2010 3:39 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

agree

also, McDaniels knows this:

1) tebow isn’t ready to start at QB yet

2) young QB’s have success when they have a good defense and running game.

look for tebow to be big next season.

by bailey disciple on Nov 1, 2010 4:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yep

"as in football so in life"

by asinsoin on Nov 1, 2010 5:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

cause they are gong to turn into a good defense and running team in the next year?

All I can do is just pour some tea for two
and speak my point of view, but it's not sane

by plainview88 on Nov 1, 2010 7:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

yeah

the OL will be healthy and more experienced and dumervil will be back.

also McD will have one more offseason’s worth of acquisitions to create a stronger, deeper overall roster.

i think both the D and the running game will be much better next year.

by bailey disciple on Nov 1, 2010 8:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

quit it. Even my own picks would have been better than McX's 2009 picks! (Funny thing ...2010 too probably haha)

http://www.centsports.com/ref/698077/Joe_Vick

If you think you know sports, try betting here for free.
I'm up to 3 dollars!

by Whidbey Bronco on Nov 1, 2010 6:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

That hit's on a pet peeve of mine

The excuse for McDaniels that the failure of the 2009 draft was do to Josh only having a few months to put together a draft strategy. Look, I’m dead serious when I say this: I think any football fan, who is fairly intelligent and moderately knowledgeable about football would have done better with absolutely no preparation.
 
At some point, can’t we get beyond the reflexive defense of Josh McDaniels,and just judge him on his performance?

by BroncoMarc on Nov 1, 2010 8:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

I voted yes because....

1 – I also believe McX need to be given more time to show what they can do and

2 – There is no other option than to stick with McD. None.

In spite of what the “FIRE MCD!” fans want, Bowlen is not going to fire McDaniels and pay him (for the next 3 years including this one), Shanahan (through 2011) and a new coach and staff next year. Won’t happen.

by Gristle McThornbody on Nov 1, 2010 1:33 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

exactly...no matter how much he may want to...

too much dead money there.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 1:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

but that is what he, and we by default,

get for firing a coach with a couple years left AND hiring an unproven rookie head coach. you basically are saying we need to try a new cheap guy.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 1:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

Correct

And good post Tim.

I don’t agree that standing pat is the right move, but well reasoned post.

I think that Denver’s organizational direction is ‘off course’ at this point. There’s too little experinece in McD and Xanders doesn’t have the player personnel chops that I think Denver needs.

I want us to hire a GM.

I think McD has the talent to get it right, but he needs someone with experience to drive while he sits shotgun on personnel decisions. I still keep the fith, but we need experienced leadership within the organization, not just on the field.

Subscribe FREE to my weekly PODcast on iTunes. The Denver broncos Podcast (http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-denver-broncos-podcast/id393488394)

Go Broncos!

by super7 on Nov 1, 2010 1:55 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

I’d also like to see an experienced GM. A Pioli type. Too bad they never went after him.

Who else is available, though? And would Bowlen want to pay them? That’s probably the real kicker.

by Gristle McThornbody on Nov 1, 2010 3:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

I found someone I like...

Eric DeCosta (Ravens Player Personnel Director)
http://www.baltimoreravens.com/People/Staff/Player_Personnel/Eric_DeCosta.aspx

Subscribe FREE to my weekly PODcast on iTunes. The Denver broncos Podcast (http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-denver-broncos-podcast/id393488394)

Go Broncos!

by super7 on Nov 1, 2010 9:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

Agree Some, Disagree Some

Tim, I agree with you in part and disagree in part.

I don’t think the draft pantry or the team was as bare as you contend following the 2008 draft and season, or if it was, then Shanahan was one Heck of a Coach to get as much out of the team as he did. Would anyone gladly take an 8-8 record with the 2010 Broncos if they are so improved? McDaniels corrected the offense, which probably could have used less tinkering, and did some temporary defensive fixes for 2009 and 2010 which appear to be unraveling. Special teams, well, Shanahan bit the bullet and made the Prater over Elam selection and it was a good one.

One could argue that in the 2009 draft, McDaniels got Vegas fever in the second round by his maneuvering to pick up A. Smith and Quinn.

I agree with you that the overall talent is better on this team than in 2008 and some of the youth movement has been good. However, McDaniels appears to have no clue as to how to pull a team out of a confidence slide and the whole idea of working harder may not be the answer. His training camp was a disaster due to all of the injuries which resulted.

What the Broncos need is some stability for the rest of the season, some confidence in the players we have, and some lightening up of the whole attitude hovering about the place. Winning football teams believe in themselves and have fun doing it.

Let’s see the kind of leader that Josh McDaniels can be I don’t think the McDaniels/Xander team is so spectacular, but they are what we have and will have until after the collective bargaining agreement is completed and until Shanahan is paid the rest of his contract.

I think the Bronco fans are paying heavily for the whimsical actions of Joe Ellis and Pat Bowlen, but that’s just the way it is. I am glad I am not paying for season tickets this year. On the job training is no way to go with the prices Denver fans pay for their football these days.

by Baltimore Bronco on Nov 1, 2010 1:48 PM MDT reply actions  

I hope we keep McD

If the team tanks bad for the remainder of the season I can see him being let go. I doubt that happens, however. I think he gets a minor mulligan on what’s been happening lately because of the situation he came into. This team had some good skill players that he traded away, but those have been adequately replaced anyway. This team has been terrible on the offensive and defensive lines for FOREVER. Offensive 3rd and 1? For the last 5 years, forget about it. No push. Defensive 3rd and 6? For the last 5 years, forget about it. No pass rush without blitzing 6.

If the team is in this same state next year, I believe he may be in jeopardy of losing his job at the conclusion of the season. I do not want to see him go to a new team only to benefit from the experience in Denver and become the next BIll Billichek.

by scotto291 on Nov 1, 2010 1:49 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for this article, it was much needed

I’ve been getting so sick and tired of the cut and run comments everywhere else. While the season so far has killed me to watch, the hints of promise McD has shown as a coach could easily be more than worth it down the line. I love his overall system and general theories on what types of players we need. His gambles, while seeming to keep coming up short, are what I’ve always been longing for in a head coach, and his passion for the game is more refreshing than a cool cup of the kool-aid I continue to return to MHR daily for.

None of us go out and play for stats. You just do whatever you can to help the team out. -- Eddie Royal

by Poster_Formerly_Known_As_Royal_Fan on Nov 1, 2010 1:52 PM MDT reply actions   2 recs

I have a combo answer

I have stopped watching games this year because I don’t beieve we have the ability to win games the way we are playing. That saddens me. For my health it is better to not watch right now.

I also am very dissapointed with the way the team plays right now and don’t endorse where the team is going right now. I also think Josh needs more time to build his team, one more season to turn the corner. If he hasn’t turned the corner by the end of 2011 then it will be time to move on.

There is no I in team.

by LovedemBroncs on Nov 1, 2010 1:52 PM MDT reply actions  

Championships take work and dedication

Agree with your message to stay the course. Hell ya! But this 2-6 record isn’t Shanny’s fault. It’s simply a product of a great discontinuity that took place when Bowlen showed Shanahan the exit.

In hiring McD, Mr. Bowlen made reasonable gamble on a long-term future. You simply don’t turn at this point. Great things are not achieved easily.

by oorange blood on Nov 1, 2010 1:54 PM MDT reply actions  

People keep saying I am blaming Shanny.

the point was, the problems we are experiencing are not from just the last 18 months. We’re talking YEARS of denial of building roster problems. YEARS. This includes Shanny.

this “you are blaming Shanny” argument is weak and is being used by people like “Negative Nelly?” to back up their “fire McD” desires. It’s a baseless argument as far as I am concerned. To deny Shanny’s involvement is to be delusional about how this team got to where it is.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 1:58 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

Wait!

But he gave us studs such as Royal, Clady, Doom, Champ, Dj and 32 other players that never played in the nfl again. I can’t see how he could shoulder any of the blame for the teams current situation. LOL

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 2:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

That 08 draft was an anomaly, Doom was kinda lucky on our part, as he was always a good pass rusher but its clear he was made for the 3-4, The champ trade was just plain thievery, and DJ was a no brainer pick

I realize your post is sarcastic, but I just wanted to point those things out. Shanny was a terrible personnel guy, and I see him doing well with a real GM in Wash for the future. But for his personnel days in Denver, they were terrible, and as the saying goes, which best describes the players you mentioned

“the sun shines even on a dog’s ass occasionally”

by DBroncs1414 on Nov 1, 2010 2:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

yeah...

I don’t know how we ever made it with his personnel moves in 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998. Wow…we were really lucky then too. You know…bringing Alfred Williams back to CO…going to get Howard Griffith…finding Eddie Mac, stumbling on Romonowski. Stealing Neil Smith from our KC nemesis. Oh…and getting real luck with a guy named TD. yeah…I wish that we never had to depend on the personnel moves made by Shanny.

On a brighter note…now we get to look forward to the brilliant Bronco careers of Richard Quinn, Brady Quinn, Gronkoski (sp), Orton (good QB -but time will tell with him if he can make the plays that win us games instead of lose games), Tebow (may never get a chance to throw – even in a blowout), Dawkins (good…old), a. smith (ooops…gone).

hmmm…actually….maybe not.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 2:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yea those were some good years

I don’t remember the Broncos making the playoffs since 2005. Now was McDaniels the coach and Xanders the gm those years (06-08)? I’ll restate my argument, 32 players NEVER played again. Thats all you need to know. NO ONE is saying that the Broncos didn’t make good personnel moves when the won the superbowl. Were talking about today man. To think every player the new regime brings in is going to be work out is ludicrous.

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 2:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

Real tired of this silly statistic. Back it up, please.

I support McD and Xanders, but let’s retire this argument about "32 Broncos who never played again UNTIL someone gives statistics to put it into context.

If you liquidated today’s Broncos, how many would forever leave the NFL? Might be more than 32, might be less. But I suspect the number is about typical of what we’d see from a lot of teams.

by oorange blood on Nov 1, 2010 3:49 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

thank you...

like you…I’m pretty tired of hearing this 32 players statistic. Doesn’t mean a whole lot to me.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 4:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

You seem to think 32 players is significant

You may want to look at the numbers for other teams – 32 is high but not unreasonable for any team cleaning out the closet. Miami has a similar record since Parcells joined them, Atlanta as well in a similar timeframe – both teams that have cleaned house like McX. Basically if any team decides to dump all their practice squad and bottom-feeder ST guys is only going to see 10% of them ever make it into a game for any other team.

by deflated on Nov 1, 2010 3:55 PM MDT up reply actions   2 recs

I recall your post on the earlier thread about the 32 players

(just looked it up… link)

It got no response there either, but I think this is worth noting, since it gives some necessary context to understanding where the team was when McDaniels took over.

by belmbo on Nov 2, 2010 8:02 AM MDT up reply actions  

32 out of 53....do the numbers on the other teams you mentioned.

I chose KC because they had a new HC and GM as well and had a worse record. The Broncos still had 10 more scrubs

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 2, 2010 1:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not 53

Go and read the quote from Xanders on the 32 players who are gone from the league. He included practice squad players, in-season cuts, everything – somewhere in the 65-75 range, I don’t have an authoritative reference for the ’08 roster moves.

I had done the numbers for a previous post, see the link from belmbo above. 30-35 players no longer in the NFL from the Dolphins (again finding lists of in-season transactions for practice squads, etc isn’t my specialty) which is pretty damn close to 32. Falcons were in the 20-25 range which isn’t too far off.

by deflated on Nov 2, 2010 4:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

All the times I've seen people reminisce about the great Shanahan years,

they almost never mention anything more recent than about 8 to 10 years ago. Shanahan was a great head coach – a mastermind even. But everything he accomplished, he accomplished a long time ago.

by CompUser on Nov 1, 2010 3:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

I loved the '2005 Broncos, and wish we'd kept Jake Plumber, who

had a win percentage of 70+. Shanny’s real problem was that, after 2005, he became impatient and started blowing things up too quickly.

by oorange blood on Nov 1, 2010 3:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

I hear he's roaming around Idaho playing handball...

I think we need to give him a call…(I’m not kidding, I loved Plummer! He got a raw deal)

2011 Colorado Zombies--Will rise from beneath homeplate with the shards of a broken season in Tulo's hand!

Brad Hawpe - Thanks Brad, you were a class act.
QPU #4, YHEG #4, Proud Member PR Gynocracy

by SDcat09 on Nov 1, 2010 4:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

If that were the case...

There wouldn’t have been such interest in him to be a head coach this year. No…I think that there is a lot to be thankful for since our super bowl years…for one, we had 1 real bad year, a lot of years where we were at the very least within 1 game of going to the playoffs. Yes, I do like to enjoy my Broncos history. Too bad you don’t. Oh and AFC championship game and 13-3 just a few years ago. yeah…not worth remembering.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 4:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

In order of your comments:

1 – There wouldn’t have been such interest in Shanahan to be a head coach? I think Buffalo, Cleveland, and Washington were the only teams to consider him.

2. I never said the Broncos didn’t have good years. I just wondered why any time anyone talked about Shanahan’s great players, the players mentioned were never more recent than 8-10 years ago. Here’s your list, which doesn’t have any player more recent than seven years ago (sorry, I missed by one year):

Alfred Williams – retired 1999
Howard Griffith – retired 2001
Ed McCaffrey – retired 2003
Bill Romanowski – went to Raiders 2001
Neil Smith – went to Chargers 1999
Terrell Davis – retired 2002 but had limited play beginning in 1999.

3. Too bad I don’t like to enjoy my Bronco history? Where did you get that idea?

4. The Broncos haven’t had a 13-3 season since 2005 (they haven’t won more than nine games in a season since), and haven’t been AFC champions since the 1997 and 1998 seasons. And yes, those years are particularly worth remembering.

by CompUser on Nov 1, 2010 5:23 PM MDT up reply actions  

CanadasBronco pretty much answered for me

That was 10 years ago and if u wanna keep mediocrity in Denver because of some accomplishments 10 years ago become a Cowboys fan please. Yes, those teams were awesome, but Shanny and his team’s past 2005 were not what we should expect or strive for

by DBroncs1414 on Nov 1, 2010 4:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

No we shouldn't strive for 8-8 or less...I completely agree...

which is why I was fine when we fired him. I was excited for some new life. I didn’t expect that the castle needed to be demolished. And, I think a lot of posters who are defending Shanny here are completely disappointed in the state of our beloved Broncos. That is why, they are calling for heat on the seat of McD…because guess what…he was 8-8 last year and putrid this year. We are striving for MORE!

Finally, it is your decision to forget about the accomplishments of Broncos of yore, but there are many of us that will never cease appreciating our glory years. If fans can’t take pleasure in the past…why keep statistics? They don’t matter in the course of a game or season. Why bring up the fact that Orton is on pace to break passing records? As soon as it is next year…it won’t matter any more right? Or will you look back on this year and enjoy the fact that Orton threw the ball so far?

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 4:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

You completely missed my point

I am not forgetting those decisions, they were great and helped finally win us an SB. But Shanny couldnt produce a good season in 4 years, which is why he was fired. The years prior he didn’t make good personnel moves either but with Plummer, Al Wilson, and a couple other solid vets he made things work somewhat. when those players left and he found no way to produce replacements, he was fired. He is still Denver’s best coach in history IMO, but 4 years and nothing doing, he got canned for a reason and proved no coach is “unfirable”

McD should get that same 4 year leeway, 3 if next year is an abortion as well. I think it is true of any coach that if you do nothing in 4 years you should get fired, which is what happened to Shanny.

And what are you telling me about Orton? I didnt mention him at all. My true opinion is somewhat favorable although it is the same as Cutler in 08: Gimme some points! Sure, its great to throw 300+ yards, but when your backup scores as much as you do in a game like that your not getting the job done.

This is a classic case of putting words in my mouth. I say nothing of Orton, nothing of completely forgetting the past, yet you say I do.

by DBroncs1414 on Nov 1, 2010 5:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

My whole point is...

I don’t like being dismissed by saying I should go be a Cowboy fan because I can appreciate more than the Super Bowl years with Shanny. To me that is disrespectful and I wouldn’t suggest that you go be a Patriots fan because of your affinity for McD. And to me…anybody who just flat out dismisses Shanny as a talent evaluator isn’t giving him credit for what he did do. Many people also don’t give him credit for what could be his greatest effort at coaching in 2005 when he didn’t have the greatest cast around anymore. And yes…I believe he did a good job with what he had in 2006 and 2007 as well. 2008 was brutal…but even 8-8 with that cast of characters was more than many coaches would have been able to do. I think it is fair and obvious to criticize him for his performance, but for some people to say that we are still fixing his mess is ridiculous. And for others to keep using the “32 players have never played again” phrase is just a copout and a weak excuse for supporting McD.

Like you, I was ok with the Shanny firing. It seemed his message had gotten stale and his playcalling had gotten predictable. Go back and look at my previous comments this year…I have never said McD should be fired. I’ve been saying he should be given an oppty to right the ship through the end of the year at least. But I’ve been critical of him and see no reason to be otherwise.

As for my comments on Orton…those weren’t directed towards you (sorry for the confusion). Those were directed to other posters who have suggested I am living in the past because I point to the good times and strong overall performance and record of Shanny when saying that we haven’t been awful, even in Shanny’s last years. they criticize me for living in the past when they themselves look at current stats for Orton and Lloyd and say how good we have it…that we are witnessing history in the making with our passing offense. Can’t have one without the other.

I will now let the dead horse rest. Sorry for the rambling, but am just working off steam.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 8:50 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

My eyes glazed over midway through, but if people are suggesting other people go be fans of another team

then the conversation should end here. Nothing good will come of it anyway. :)

Besides, if we weren’t Bronco fans, we wouldn’t be here talking it up. Hell, we are not even fairweather Bronco fans….not many flyby fan blog or comment on blogs about their team. ;-)

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 8:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

midway through the entire conversation here, not through just your comment gcman. lol

in case that is construed incorrectly.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 8:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

ha...ws a funny comment nonetheless...

my eyes were glazing through while I was typing it!

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 8:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

I can only think of two actual draft picks by Shanny in the 1990's that panned out for us.

TD and Big Al. I would add Trevor Pryce, but Shanny inexplicably let him go.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:44 PM MDT up reply actions  

Mobley was another major cog drafted...but you are right...

not a lot to go off there. But I’ve said before…there is more than 1 way to skin a cat. We won those super bowls not because of our draft picks, but because of some shrewd moves by shanny and company. Hard to duplicate though.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 8:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

Love Mobley, but he had no staying power...injury ended his career after 3 years.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 9:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

mobley

played 7 years 96-03

okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider

by j-man on Nov 2, 2010 2:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

hmm, i wonder why i cannot recall him in any game beyond 1999?

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 2, 2010 3:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

his

carrer end in Balt in 03 makeing a tacklie in the 2 q i know because i watched that game

okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider

by j-man on Nov 2, 2010 5:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

i dont doubt you are correct...

I’m just curious as to why I have no recollection of him after the 1999-2000 time period.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 2, 2010 7:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

the broncos during that time...

had Wilson, Ian Gold, and Mobley…what was one of the fastest and best linebacking groups in the NFL.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 2, 2010 10:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ahh, now I remember.

We drafted DJ because Mobley went down.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 2, 2010 10:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think...

that is the beginning of the end of good defense in Denver…Mobley went down…Ian Gold left via free agency and then of course Al Wilson ended up getting hurt. Damn…what a shame.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 2, 2010 10:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm Not Sayting That

I fully agree that Shanahan had some holes in his organizational building and in his drafting. He never got things right on the defensive line and we have paid for it for years.

Nor do I subscribe to the theory because of a poor start and two disasters that you throw out rebuilding.

I do agree that there have not been enough checks on the maneuverings of Josh McDaniels. Just as everything Dallas glowed for Dan Reeves, and things San Francisco shone brightly for Shanahan, we have had enough of being the farm or retirement team for the Patriots under Josh McDaniels.

Why can’t we have had an offensive line that could both pass block AND run block? If this beefy line is supposed to run block better, show me the results….

Why does McDaniels get a pass on injuries this year when Shanahan did not in 2008?

The Broncos need to learn from their mistakes in 2010 just like we learned from some mistakes of earlier years. I think it is financially impractical to toss McDaniels and Xanders now. Besides, they do need time to try to clean up their messes. This team can get better. That is the job of coaching.

Let’s let McDaniels rise or fall based upon what he does the rest of this year to overcome adversity.

and, I agree with staying the course. Changing coordinators or even head coaches sometimes solves problems, but usually does not.

by Baltimore Bronco on Nov 1, 2010 2:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

I Support This Piece Verbatim

Thank you, Tim, for saying nearly EXACTLY what I have been feeling. I had been working on something similar all day and it is now crumpled in the garbage. This was spot on. Keep it up. The truest fans, able to look at things with a rational perspective share your sentiment. Go Broncos.

by milehighsalute303 on Nov 1, 2010 2:03 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks man!

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

My thoughts on this team are the same

We are just a very young and inexperienced team. Its hard to admit that to vets like Dawk and Champ and Williams, but it’s true. Hopefully the team gains the needed experience and makes a run next year. Who thought the Rams or Bucs or Chiefs young teams would make such quick strides? Hopefully we can follow suit

by DBroncs1414 on Nov 1, 2010 2:12 PM MDT reply actions  

Great article Tim

And I agree, while I’m not happy with how this season is going, I realize that great teams are created easily or quickly. Look at the dynasties of the last decade, Indy, NE, and Philly, they struggled for 2-3 seasons before rising to the top. McD has made mistakes, and I don’t approve of everything he’s done, but with any coach, you need to give them time, and MHR agrees with you it seems, and they did during the off season as well, with 78% saying 3-4 seasons. Link.

And just a bit of history, since 2005, there have been 23 coaches who got a second season. Of those 23, only 9 improved in their second season, that’s 39%, 1 stayed the same, 4%, and 13 got worse, 57%. It’s actually the norm for a coach to regress in their second season.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 2:18 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Good stuff.

Those stats actually make me feel better. lol

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Have to disagree

I am not advoacting removing McDaniels yet, but the issue is that Mr. Bowlen has stayed the course and things have not gotten better and prospects are dim moving forward.

The fact is that like it or not, the management system is essentially the same as when Shanahan was here, basically the HC calls all the shots, there is no checks and balances. This system has not worked well in general in the NFL, somehow Mr. Bowlen needs to change the system if he expects results to change.

The other issue is that McDaniels is trying to be too many things at once, head personnel man, head coach, and OC. Honestly, he needs to hire someone to be the OC and allow him to focus on the team. He needs to coach the coach.

I look at it like this, and OC or DC is alot like a manager, they worry about day to day production, how to be more effecient, etc.

HC is more like a CEO, they need to have a grand vision and be able to work with their managers in achieving this vision. He needs to allow someone else to run the day to day stuff and get more involved in coaching the coaches.

Staying the course is not the way to win or build a great franchise, staying the course is leading us down the path of NFL insignifigance.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman

by Broncoman on Nov 1, 2010 2:38 PM MDT reply actions  

Tell that to 56% of HC that's regress in their second seasons since 2005

That bounce back in their 3rd season. You don’t build long term success by constantly changing coaches, ask Cleveland, Detroit or Buffalo.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 2:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

You're Wrong : Romeo Crennel & Butch Davis

Romeo Crennel and Butch Davis were each given 4 seasons to drive their franchise into the ground. The only seasonal success were the result of the very soft scheduling that results from being a losing franchise. You’re argument for extending tenure to assure success is specious at best. History has shown that the wrong man in the wrong job will generally result in prolonged failure, not long term success. The best thing Denver could do would be to dismiss McDaniels and, possibly, Xander and hire proven talent for both positions. Maintaining the status quo only ensures a softer schedule next season and additional draft picks, but what benefit are those when the HC and GM throw away picks on dubious talent and fail to win against even weak opponents?

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 3:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

So you give me two examples while I give you the majority of coaches

Nice work. Two coaches don’t mean anything compared to 17 over five seasons. I can find one or two examples to prove anything, give me 10+ and I’ll start believing you.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 3:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

I can give you plenty of examples

Wade Phillips
Buffalo Record
10-6
11-5
8-8
Dallas Record
13-3
9-7
11-5
1-6
Sam Wyche (Tampa Bay)
5-11
5-11
6-10
7-9
Herm Edwards (NYJ)
10-6
9-7
6-10
4-12
Herm Edwards (KC)
9-7
4-12
2-14
Steve Mariucci (Det)
5-11
6-10
4-7

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman

by Broncoman on Nov 1, 2010 3:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

So you gave me two examples of coaches the improved in their second seasons

Mariucci and Phillips in Buffalo, and you even helped my argument with Edwards, twice, Phillips in Dallas and Wyche didn’t improve. How does this help your argument again?

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 3:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

The arguement was does giving a coach three years or four years help

As can be seen, almost all these guys had teams that went south after 3 or 4 years, only Wyche improved, and that was still below 500 mark

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman

by Broncoman on Nov 1, 2010 3:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hm, lets look at this

Every single coach has up and downs, even the best like Walsh or Shula, and you might want to take into account that of those five examples where the coach has left, Detroit hasn’t had a winning season, KC is possibly on their way to their first, the Bills have had one winning season, the Jets have been up and down and only the Bucs have had success. So firing those coaches sure didn’t really lead to much. If coaches got fired after 2-3 season, Madden wouldn’t have lead a team to the Super Bowl, Shula didn’t have post season success till season six, Belichick took four seasons to get going, and he had two terrible following seasons, Bill Walsh was 24-33 his first four seasons, and Tom Landry didn’t have a winning record till his sixth season. These coaches would likely be fired by fans, some were fired, but they went on and showed that they could win.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 4:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

It's an interesting idea

You bring up hall of fame coaches as examples, which I would say is rare, most NFL HC are not HOF coaches. And like it or not, this is a win now league, the notion that you have four or five years to build a team is ancient history since in most regards you have 20 to 35 percent roster turnover every year, as oppossed to those old teams that could have guys stored on IR or other areas and really build a team. This is the new reality of the NFL, you simply can’t wait for four years to see results. I look at the coaches that were hired the same year as McDaniels: Haley in KC, Spagnola in St. Louis, Schwartz in Detroit, Ryan in NY, and Morris in Tampa Bay—all of them have teams that have progressed from last year to this year, we are the only one that has regressed. That says something.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman

by Broncoman on Nov 1, 2010 4:27 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

I could use other coaches but I use HoF coaches to prove a point

Hindsight it 20/20, at the time, fans today would have wanted Walsh or Shula or Landry fired, and that would have been a big mistake. Is McD a future HoF, I’m not sure, and we won’t know for a while, but imagine how stupid those teams would have felt if they’d fired those guys and they went on to have success and a HoF career elsewhere, I know most Browns fans are still upset Belichick was fired. Every coach is different, but one thing is pretty constant, it’s almost impossible to gauge a HC on two seasons.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 4:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Different Era

The Bill Bilichik argument doesn’t work because he was the HC prior to the Ravens/Browns split. Furthermore, of his five years as the Browns HC he only posted a single “winning” season (gawd preserve us from such a long failed experiment with McDaniels!) and it took him basically five more years of growing as a person and expanding his repertoire as a coach before he embarked on a reign of greatness with another team. In other words, to make a similar investment in McDaniels we would have to allow a decade of mediocrity to pass under the bridge in order that we might reap the harvest of his un-demonstrated genius. I, for one, will pass…:)

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 5:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

The Ravens/Brown split is irrelavent

And ask any Brown fan, they’d have waited for Belichick to develop because they’ve done nothing but what you recommend, switch coaches every 2-3 seasons, they’d gladly wait 3-4 seasons to become a dynasty.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 5:23 PM MDT up reply actions  

Unlikely

If there is a Browns fan alive that would have given Bilichik a decade of mediocrity he wasn’t speaking when it mattered. If I can choose who I WANTED to be my franchise’s head coach based on 20/20 hindsight there would be a fine list of candidates indeed. Unfortunately, in the real world we make decisions based on the results in hand. By that measurement, Bilichik was a failure in Cleveland and there is absolutely no assurance that he would have ever become what we see in New England today. Why? Because he grew as a coach and person. What the future holds for any of us is a mystery. We may have failed at some endeavors only to realize a potential in another project. the “staying the course” argument suggests that we double down and stay in that bad place until we hit pay-dirt, strike the mother-lode, but such strategies seldom work. Albert Einstein has widely been credited with the following wisdom “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”. Regardless of who actually made that statement, its truth is universal. I also happen to believe it is applicable to the situation in Broncoland.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 5:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

Now you are just exaggerating

“A decade of mediocrity” come on, he was 11-5 his third season, with a playoff win, and his second season in NE, his seventh in the NFL he won a Super Bowl, yea, actually talk to some Cleveland fans before you start talking.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 5:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

Straw Man

Yeah, man, I’m sure I could find plenty of Browns fans NOW that would like Bilichik to be their coach. Back in 1995, however, they were pretty bloody vocal about showing him the door…:) Do you even read the post before you reply? Try to keep up, please. In Cleveland, Bilichik posted one good year out of five seasons. That means that four years out of his five he posted losing seasons. it didn’t matter that he won x number of games in that one good season. He could not sustain, or build upon that momentum and was allowed to leave when Modell moved the team to Baltimore. Using YOUR argument, the Browns should have retained him for an additional 5 years of mediocrity, rather than allow him to leave, in the hope that he would become a superbowl winning coach for them. Once again, we come back to the question I keep asking : “how long is long enough?”. at what point should Broncos fans acknowledge that McDaniels may not be at the right point in his development to lead our team to the superbowl? At what point do we stop excusing the failures and hold the coach accountable for the product he is placing on the field?

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 6:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm saying 3-4 years, and of course the Brown fans are looking retrospectively

And I never, ever said keep a coach for five years, so that’s not my argument, so stop saying it is. I’m saying that giving up on a coach after two seasons is too short, not sure where you keep getting the idea that I want to keep McD for 5 or 10 seasons. History shows that by season 3 the coach shows what they are made of, so around 3-4 seasons is the best time to determine the quality of your coach. If you believe in constantly changing HC’s we are going to be in for a decade similar to the Lions, one filled with a revolving door of HC and a terrible decade.

And just so you know, I’m all for coaching accountability, if you’d followed any game threads or posts you’d know that. I’ve been on that side for weeks and I still am, but I’m also on the side reason, not emotion. I realize that as soon as we start hiring and firing head coaches every couple seasons were aren’t going to have any success.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 7:49 PM MDT up reply actions  

...not sure where you keep getting the idea ....

Going back in the thread, you make the argument that certain teams should never have released an under-performing coach so quickly. You used some big name examples.

 I demonstrated that those coaches were given plenty of time and it simply resulted in additional failure with their “first” team. I also pointed out that those coaches were not immediately hired by another team for an equivalent position.

 In your example of Bilichik, that was five years later. Thus, if you are going to argue that Cleveland should have retained him “longer” to develop him into the talent we see today, you must account for the time he spent as a journeyman, honing his craft and leadership skills.

 Additionally, I pointed out that there would still have been no guarantee that Bilichik would have progressed for Cleveland into the leader New England has enjoyed. You then made the case that Cleveland fans would have been willing to make that sacrifice and I pointed out that hindsight is always 20/20. Tenure doesn’t guarantee success.

I will point out that in your example of Detroit, you overlooked the fact that Matt Millen was allowed to retain his job as GM for 8 seasons. During that time he exercised far more control and influence than his head coaches and completely ran the franchise into the ground. He was, in fact, another example, of my opinion, that keeping a fella in his job, when he has repeatedly failed, will very likely just result in more failure.

 I’m definitely not judging you, my friend, just stating my opinions like you have. I know we both want the Broncos to succeed. It’s just that we have different opinions about how that should be accomplished. Anyway, thanks for a great thread…:)

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 3, 2010 6:30 AM MDT up reply actions  

Yep

It says that the fans demand winning now. Thank God the owner does not feel that way.

Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Don’t worry about it. As an ignorant redneck, I’m qualified to say that.

by Sean in Pa. on Nov 1, 2010 4:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

"Thank God the owner does not feel that way."

None of us know what Pat Bowlen feels, or thinks about this mess. all we can do is speculate, or assume. While you have posited a reasonable assumption, I would speculate that his primary motivation is cash. Mr. Bowlen has been one of the leading advocates for taking a “get tough” policy with the NFL-PA, regarding a new CBA. I believe Mr. Bowlen has demonstrated a belief that there will be a lockout in 2011. From THAT perspective, all of the moves made with the Broncos, even their losing record, would be consistent. Just a thought…:)

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 5:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

KC, the Rams, Detroit and Tampa all suffered long downturns, and

benefited from better draft positions. Take away Sam Bradford, and I’m not sure there’d be so much sunshine in St. Louis. Take away Suh from Detroit, and the Lions wouldn’t look quite as mean and nasty as they’re starting to look.

Love that kid Josh Freeman, by the way. Haven’t watched Tampa play, but Freeman seems like a winner.

by oorange blood on Nov 1, 2010 4:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

I

watched part of the Bucs-Cardinals game after that tool Brett Favre was carted off the field in the fetal position. Freeman is a player, the Bucs will be good for years now!

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Nov 2, 2010 12:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

Plain as the nose on your face...:)

I think we both provided a riposte to your argument. What you choose to make of the proof is up to you. Failure in the NFL isn’t an uncommon event. In fact, more players, coaches and staff fall to the wayside than rise to the top. It is my opinion that we have a pair of wannabe’s as opposed to the next storied team leads.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 5:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

Plain, he provided six examples, I provided six

Got to keep up man. We are entitled to opinions, but history shows, if you fire a coach after two seasons, you aren’t getting a good look.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 5:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

Cleveland gave Bilichik Five Seasons

Cleveland gave Bilichik Five Seasons. At what point were they expected to see a return on their investment? My question has consistently been “how long is long enough?”. Frankly, if we wait long enough the NFL will likely “give” us a “winning” season simply through their practice of issuing “soft” schedules to losing teams. This has been the case even with several of the coaches mentioned in our particular thread. Those winning seasons, however, were, for the most part, the anomaly. Personally, I believe Bill Bilichik’s career makes the case that having the wrong person in the wrong place simply ensures the wrong results. Five years with the Browns and only one good season (soft schedule?). Five years later Bilichik signs with the Patriots and immediately turns the franchise into a Super Bowl contender. He didn’t hide behind the excuses of personnel moves, administrative changes, or antsy players. The right man was in the right place and the results were obvious. Mike Shannahan displayed the similar results when he took over the Broncos. Markedly different results than he had achieved in Oakland. Eventually, McDaniels might become some franchise’s prized SuperBowl winning coach, but from his record so far, I’m willing to bet it won’t be with the Broncos. That’s my opinion and, like you , I’m sticking by it…:)

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 5:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

The thing is

EVeryone wants to believe that because Belichek was a successful coach after his first stint the same will hold true with McDaniels. By that token Denver should can McDaniels after the season and go pick up Charile Wiess. Might as well speed up the process and certainly the similiarities are there. Former head coach? check, New England system? Check?

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 5:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

And I'm a huge supporter of the belief the BB trains better coordinators then HC's

But it’s not just about BB, he’s an example, but I believe the unless you don’t win 4-6 games average your first two seasons, you should get 3-4 seasons to get going, otherwise you just aren’t giving coaches time.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 5:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

And that's all we got, opinions, which don't change often

I’ll say mine one more time, 57% of coaches regress in their second season, only 39% actually improve, over the past five seasons. It’s just history that most coaches, good and bad, regress in their second season, McD isn’t alone, it’s happened to the best. My opinion is 3-4 seasons unless they completely suck, less then 4 wins on average over the first two seasons. I do believe that some coaches in some places are perfect fits, but ask how many coaches Detroit, Cleveland, and other teams have gone through looking for the magical fit. Those coach/team fits are about as rare as “franchise quarterbacks.” I’m not saying keep McD forever, I’m saying wait the season out before even thinking of firing the guy.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 6:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hey! We got a number...:)

Okay, man, I’m happy, you finally gave me a number. 3 to 4 years to evaluate a coach in your opinion. I believe, absolutely, that McDaniels will get three actual seasons, although 2011may be a lockout. I disagree with that. I think we’ve seen all we need to see to make a determination. After all, how many years would you give an employee to destroy your business? Would you let a subordinate put your career in jeopardy for three or four years by only occasionally succeeding at their job? The fact is that, unless the Broncos dominate the second half of this season, the NFL will very likely award Denver a “soft” schedule consistent with the policy of matching losing franchises with, mostly, other losing franchises. So, if he succeeds on a soft schedule where he cannot on a normal schedule, how does that affect our evaluation? This may come as a surprise, but there are very few mediocre teams that make it to the superbowl and that should be the goal. Really, that’s the rub isnt it? Are we aiming for a superbowl, or just aiming for not being embarrassed every week? No matter how much spin we apply to the McDaniels era so far, I, for one, don’t see a superbowl in three, or four years. Unless someone can demonstrate otherwise, I say part ways with Mickey-D now and let another coach try his hand at turning the franchise around. Better that then wait four years and then embark on, yet another, rebuilding phase.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 7:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don't want coaches just "try his hand"

We can’t change head coaches every two seasons, you can’t run a good team that way, you just can’t.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 7:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

Who do you have in mind?

Since you’re so adamant about making a change after 18 months. You must have a real can’t miss coach in mind.

"as in football so in life"

by asinsoin on Nov 1, 2010 10:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

Somewhere in this forum...:)

I actually posted a reply somewhere in this forum which gives my answer. I’m not big into reposts, or cut-n-pasting so you’ll have to look for it.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 3, 2010 6:06 AM MDT up reply actions  

LOL...

In the time it took you to tell me you weren’t going to tell me you could have told me. Fail…..

"as in football so in life"

by asinsoin on Nov 3, 2010 2:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

Again, I am not advocating removing McDaniels yet

What I am advocating is a change in management (a real GM that has power) and getting an offensive coordinater. I agree in general that changing coaches every two years is a good thing, but if the coach and system is not improving, then something needs to change.

"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman

by Broncoman on Nov 1, 2010 3:23 PM MDT up reply actions  

for the record...

I didn’t vote in the poll…because my choice isn’t there. I think its ridiculous to consider firing McD at this point. I believe he should be given 1 more off-season to tweak his system to match the strengths of his players. I also believe he should get 1 more shot at the draft and 1 more training camp. Then…it is do or die time for McD and his system. If next year, we are below .500 at the bye and we are still playing mediocre ball…we cut bait at that point. If we are at .500 or better, then well…we are making progress and that deserves acknowledgment.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 2:46 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Your answer is "yes" then

Staying the course and weathering the storm means do not cut and run, give them another year and a half.

"I don't need love, I just need wins." -Kyle Orton, 2010

by gahoagie on Nov 1, 2010 2:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don't see it that way...

for me staying the course would mean giving McD every second of his 4 year contract and then reevaluating. I am suggesting taking a look at mid season next year and then cutting ties if it isn’t working. but it is definitely not firing him now.

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 3:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

I hear ya

I am ready to give him this and next year. There has to be accountability either way after that.

"I don't need love, I just need wins." -Kyle Orton, 2010

by gahoagie on Nov 1, 2010 4:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

Pat Bowlen Should Be Ashamed Of What McDaniels And Xander Put On The Field

Tim Lynch, I couldn’t disagree with you more. Frankly, your piece is so full of unadulterated man-love for the prime subjects that I felt a bit like a peeping-tom while reading. Your contention that Xander has improved the team through the draft and free agency is ludicrous and omits some notable failures.Then we have the highly over-rated head coach Josh McDaniels with his poor game planning, motivational and training skills and a play book that has been repeatedly “exposed” by NFL defensive coordinators of varying talent levels. While apologists such as yourself craft op/ed pieces portraying the HC and GM in the best possible light, you conveniently forget that the the gaudy personal stats and drama-queen antics, which have become a feature of the McDaniels tenure, utterly fail to translate into success for the franchise. After two years and a complete make-over, McDaniels has failed to deliver more than mediocrity. How much time should we give a coach who has delivered steadily DECREASING returns for a franchise that was, not so long ago, widely recognized as a top draw and serious competitor? Pat Bowlen will stick with this Dimwitted Duo through 2010 given the strong possibility of a lockout in 2011. However, in trading the franchise bottom line for quality of product, Mr. Bowlen is risking the patronage of the fanbase. At this point, it can be truthfully stated that even Mr. Kaiser put a better product on the field than what we’re seeing now.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 2:51 PM MDT reply actions  

Your piece is written fairly well

But some advice, name calling wont get you much discussion or respect on these boards.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 2:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thanks

I appreciate the feedback.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 3:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

You must not visit very often

Because Tim has made some critical remarks of McD this season.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 3:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

Perhaps, but THIS was the article to which I was responding...:)

I’m sure he has, but the piece I commented about was disappointing and subjective. Of course, that’s the thing about opinions : everyone’s got one.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 3:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

This was a wonderfully crafted comment.

Nicely written and very pretty, but much like Jessica Simpson once you get past the attractiveness and eloquence you are left with very little substance.

When was this team regarded as a top draw and serious competitor?
2005 I suppose.

McDaniels playbook has been repeatedly exposed ?
2007 was a bad year for the Patriots I suppose. I guess the play book was exposed in the last two games, but that hardly makes a play book inadequate.

What failures has their been through free agency?
Jarvis Green certainly. I happen to think Dawkins, Goodman, Bannan, Jamal Williams, Brandon Lloyd, etc. are all playing or have played at a high level.

The draft has had some major failures, but what outside of Smith and Quinn has led you to this level of disappointment?
Most other players still need time to be evaluated. I suppose guys like Brandstater are no longer on the team, but is a late round pick that does not pan out a failure?

With the way your comment is written, I am certain there are many excellent thoughts in your head. Hopefully you will elaborate on them and add some meat to this comment.

by The Ds on Nov 1, 2010 3:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

Every team

Makes mistakes. Like the Vikings with Randy Moss. Must have been McDaniels on the vikings who made that deal.

by BroncosCanada on Nov 1, 2010 3:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

or Shanny

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 4:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

You seems to have answered your own questions to your satisfaction...:)

Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate the mild sarcasm and found it humorous. As for impressing you with elaboration, why bother? I will not likely alter your opinion and you certainly will not change mine. You, in fact, have hit on several issues which support my position that there is a failure in the team’s leadership. Anything I could say is more appropriately expressed as the numbers 2 and 6.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 7:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

I am not sure if your mind is open to debate, mine certainly is.

I saw your comment and thought that you most likely have a good head on your shoulders and would bring some excellent educated debate, and that is even for a guy who starts off his comment with an attack on the individual who wrote the article.

This is not about impressing me. you were the one who made the general statements and brought nothing educated at all to reinforce where they are coming from.

Feel free to elaborate because I think there is some excellent talking points that you brought up. Obviously if you are unable to elaborate then it would be best to not make the comment in the first place

by The Ds on Nov 1, 2010 7:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

Faint praise and sarcasm...:)

I thanked you for your initial feedback even though it opened with a personal attack disguised as humorous sarcasm. You have chosen to once again make a thinly disguised personal attack and offer faint praise as a prophylactic platitude.

My post needs no elaboration. Like every other comment in this thread and the article to which they are associated, it is an opinion. Ironically, however, your post elaborated a number of the issues which contributed to both our team’s failures and my opinion. Anything I could say is clearly vindicated by McDaniel’s record. The fact that his poor record is punctuated by embarrassing losses against bad teams is additional justification of my views, in my opinion (there’s that word again…:) .

You say your mind is open, but, clearly, from your own comments that is not the case. Furthermore, based on your personal attacks and rather smarmy replies, I suspect you may be trying to initiate a flame war. If that is not the case, then I am heartened. However, I’m letting you know that the impression you are leaving is a negative one.

Sometimes, it’s better to simply agree to disagree. So, rather than being drawn into anything unfortunate, I will simply wish you a nice day…:)

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 3, 2010 6:00 AM MDT up reply actions  

One of those guys...

Great, just what everyone wants… someone willing to lay down their opinion but not actually discuss their ideas. Why post if you don’t want to debate your opinions? Last time I checked, the Socratic method is still very effective and enjoyable, not to mention, constructive.
What exactly did D reinforce in his comment that there’s failure in the team’s leadership?

I think it was Perrish Cox. Don’t quote me on it. - Sayre Bedinger

by WakeBronco on Nov 1, 2010 10:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Whatever...:)

For a fella that generally posts less than a complete sentence, I think it’s amusing to hear you complain about my lack of elaboration…:) As far as discussing my position, in my brief tenure on this OPINION forum I have extensively discussed my OPINION. As for being drawn into a pointless banter with seemingly hostile persons whose OPINIONS are set and in contrast to my own, well, that’s just good manners and better sense. Have a nice day…:)

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 3, 2010 5:36 AM MDT up reply actions  

I think you just restated Tim's argument...

You did notice what you said right? “After two years and a complete make-over”. And as Xander himself stated, evidence of the makeover being necessary is that almost everyone we cut no longer plays in the NFL.

You don’t do a “complete” makeover and suffer huge injury losses and win big in the NFL in only two seasons. And you are correct. I can think of few teams that have so completely retooled as the Broncos.

They’re competing, but making mistakes. We will do well to stay the course while these guys develop.

by ksondere on Nov 1, 2010 3:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

How long?

I appreciate the feedback on my comment. However, my opinion is that "staying the course didn’t work out well for the Titanic and it, probably, won’t work out well for the Broncos. When we feel the need to make excuses for repeated failure, we have already acknowledged the severity of the failure and girded ourselves for more of the same.

 So, how much failure is enough? At what point do we, as fans, hold the architects of that failure accountable? Would we know after three years? Four? Perhaps, five seasons? When would you be willing to concede that the current regime was lacking in the ability to plan, sell and execute a strategy for success? The NFL is not a year round event. Players, coaches and administrators have just 16 meaningful weeks in a year to display their talents. Success belongs to those who have the skills portfolio to succeed in that challenging environment.

 As Xander stated, many of the players released are currently no longer playing in the NFL. Applying the same logic to McDaniels and Xander, how many owners would likely hire either for their current positions if released by the Broncos? Realistically, it is unlikely either of them would be hired for the equivalent position on another NFL team. Doesn’t that make the case for a change?

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 3:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

nice points

I wanted to bring up the point about McD and Xanders but didnt have the energy to keep going at it with people.

I think its a valid point, if its not good enough for the other 31 NFL why would it be good enough for Denver?

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 3:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

After how many months then? How many years?

You know, I’m almost convinced this too can be blamed on Canada…so don’t push it, you hoser…:)

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 7:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

I’ve posted elsewhere in this thread that I believe McDaniels is a lock for three seasons. I’ve also stated a belief that the third season is a pointless measurement for a struggling coach. Given the way the NFL schedules, a declining franchise will, generally, get a “soft” schedule in year three, or four. That’s consistent with the NFL policy of scheduling bad teams with, mostly, other bad teams. Teams (and their struggling coaches) which benefit from those “soft” schedules often experience better win-loss ratios and, briefly, renewed fan enthusiasm. However, those marginal teams rarely proceed far in the playoffs. Regardless, I think we can count on McDaniels seeing three full seasons with Denver, even if 2011 turns out to be a lockout year.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 3, 2010 4:05 AM MDT up reply actions  

OC's and DC's

are continually hired by teams to be head coaches. By your reasoning Belicheck, Shanahan, Dungy would never have been hired by any of the other 31 teams because they did not fair well at their first jobs. I wonder how many of those teams fans lamented letting them go only to become great coaches with other teams.
It has not been two years. Not yet and McDaniels is signed to a four year contract ( I may be wrong and it may only be three).
It is too soon to be chanting change. No matter if you think someone would do a better job we have this group for now. I would also like to know who you think can take the reigns and make this team a winner by the end of next season. One thing, your choices are limiited to coaches that are actually available.

Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Don’t worry about it. As an ignorant redneck, I’m qualified to say that.

by Sean in Pa. on Nov 1, 2010 4:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

OCs and DCs

You can pound a square peg into a round hole if you hit it hard and long enough. This forum, like the article we are responding to, is an expression of opinions. Your signature alludes to the value of opinions and of their general immutability. I believe it was a mistake to hire an unproven coordinator with whom the franchise had no experience. That put the Broncos in the position of taking his abilities as a leader on faith. Is McDaniels an impressive OC? Given the gaudy personnel statistics some players generate under his schemes, the answer is a qualified “yes”. Qualified because his offense failed to secure a Superbowl victory in 2007 and failed to secure a playoff berth in 2008, all while generating impressive statistics for that offense (sound familiar?). Mike Shanahan, by contrast, was well known to the Broncos franchise (having served in the organization over a number of seasons) and was heavily pursued by Mr. Bowlen. While his record in Oakland may not have been impressive, his resume for success was well established within the League and the Broncos organization. Comparing the two is really a case of “apples to oranges”. However, any real fan of the Broncos should know that Mike Shanahan was not, in fact, immediately rehired as a head coach by the Denver Broncos. In fact, there was a 5 season gap between Shanahan’s tenure with the Raiders and his appointment to be the Broncos head man. Bill Bilichik also had a five season gap between head coaching stints. Tony Dungy isn’t really a good example for you to include as he had been a fairly successful head coach in Tampa Bay, but failed to deliver a Superbowl and was released. I stand by my opinion that retaining the wrong man in the wrong system simply results in the wrong result. I never advocated tossing McDaniels at the mid-season mark, but I certainly believe he should be let go following the end of this season, unless he can show a dramatic improvement. I will not make some foolish statement that Coach X will guarantee the Broncos success. I do feel that a more extensive selection process should be employed in seeking a successor. I also strongly feel that whomever we replace McDaniels with should have an extensive resume within the league and not simply rely on the “I have a feeling” method. Of course, what I, you, or anyone on this forum believe is irrelevant : Pat Bowlen calls the shots. If Mr. Bowlen wants to give McDaniels a decade to learn their craft, develop their leadership skills and refine their strategies then that is exactly what will happen. All of our speculation is simply speculation, opinion and back-seat driving.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 3, 2010 5:05 AM MDT up reply actions  

McDaniels Epic Failure On Initial Talent Evaluations

Frankly, there was very little need to destroy the Shanahan offense. Certainly, the unit should have been given a full season of evaluation, but McDaniels clearly decided on a clean sweep approach. This was in marked contrast to his public comments, I might add. Actions, however, always speak louder than words. The defensive unit, by contrast, had demonstrated weaknesses and, yet, was allowed a full and fair evaluation. I think many fans feel as I did in that we were just a competent defense away from regaining dominance in this division. Now, McDaniels and Xander get to blame the make-over they initiated for their abysmal failure to date. It’s circular and unconvincing from an objective view. It’s also ironic that many advocate giving the pair more of an “evaluation” period than they were willing to extend to a proven offensive unit. The very fact that the current team is on its second season under the McDaniels “system” and is actually getting worse speaks more truth than any argument I could make. After all, it’s not like the players being featured are rookies. The majority of our skill position players are league veterans and quite a few of them are veterans of the New England methodology. I personally believe that Mr. Bowlen’s primary rationale for the many changes made in the past two seasons has been the looming labor issues which may result in a 2011 lockout. If that is the case, then hiring an unproven, but cheap, coach and staff who will reduce the bottom line at any cost is a winning scenario. If that same coach and staff can actually deliver wins it’s simply icing on the cake. Whatever the logic, it’s out of our hands as fans, but that doesn’t mean we have to be happy about the situation.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 3, 2010 5:30 AM MDT up reply actions  

If Tim Lynch's piece came across as being full of unadulterated man-love,

then I guess you have to consider that yours came across as the ex wife? :-)

by CompUser on Nov 1, 2010 4:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

ha...it's getting funny in here!

"They are who we thought they were!"

by gcman on Nov 1, 2010 4:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

If Tim Lynch's piece came across as being full of unadulterated man-love,

LoL…no, amigo, I’m the jilted significant other from college…:)

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 1, 2010 7:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

makes sense

that was before he was a millionaire, back then he was just a guy, and the two of you were going to fight the man and go all the way. You used to play that Bob Seger vinyl, “Against the Wind,” and you knew it was all too good to last….

:)

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 8:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

Love the reference

I think it was Perrish Cox. Don’t quote me on it. - Sayre Bedinger

by WakeBronco on Nov 1, 2010 10:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

I only share my opinion; you are free to have yours.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

Oh snap son.

I’d give ’em his contract.

Paying three coaches at once would be an atrocity.

by Matt In Canada on Nov 1, 2010 9:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

@Tim Lynch..love the piece and an excellent time to publish.

I do not understand some posters that think Brian Xanders is not a good GM. He has done excellent work with Dawkins, Goodman, Hill, Williams, Vickerson, Bannan, Lloyd, Gaffney plus working out very good compensation for Marshall, Cutler, and Sheffler.
NAH, this TEAM neeeds to finish the plan.

by DLMyers on Nov 1, 2010 3:05 PM MDT reply actions  

Emotions are running high.

It’s hard to look at the body of work when you are still pissed off about a bloody beatdown by the hated Raiders.

Overall, I think this team is on the right track. We just have to keep the faith. There ARE positives in all of this – its just hard to see them right now.

And Thanks! :)

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm going to trust Mr Bowlen to . . .

1) Have the courage to do what he thinks right at the time he chooses. Personally, I think that is to stay the course for at least this year. How would you all feel if the team went 6 – 2 in the second half?

2) Not panic after less than 2 years. After all, how long did he stick with Coach Shanahan after it became obvious that we were going downhill vs getting back to the glory years.

3) Not throw away potential for emotional disappointment.

Rec’d to Tim

by 83BroncoFan on Nov 1, 2010 3:12 PM MDT reply actions  

Your article makes a great case for continuing with current leadership, but

I disagree with one of your primary facts: solid drafts and free agencies under McD/X. The Broncos, mostly because they traded away several players, probably had the best selection of draft picks in the NFL over the past two years. The 2010 draft is probably the deepest and most talented draft class in history. So having some promising talents does not mean the drafting performance was solid. Relative to all the Broncos drafting opportunities, they are not getting much productivity from those two drafts. While the grade is still incomplete, I think the final grade is looking below average [D] so far, based on all the selections we had.

I’m pleased to see an article from staff addressing Pat Bowlen. But instead of urging him to stand pat, I want to know more about his involvement and current actions. While Pat Bowlen has been one of the best NFL owners – and Denver should be greatful for his past leadership – is he still up to that responsibility??? Perhaps I am not aware of his recent involvement, because to me he appears to be AWOL.

Has he made any statements recently? Did he go to LOndon? If not, why? The Broncos had a reputation of spending well on players – virtually all of the salary cap. But from available data, it appears they are currently spending far less than the cap. Also, they appear to be spending well below average on coaches/GMs (excluding dead money for departed personnel). Are they operating on the cheap now? If so, why? In the past, Pat Bowlen was frequently mentioned as being one of the NFL’s more influential owners, in general articles. I have read several such articles over the past 18 months; and do not recall his name mentioned once, but many other owners names were mentioned.

Is Pat Bowlen currently up to the responsibility of being a solid NFL owner?

by cohiker on Nov 1, 2010 3:17 PM MDT reply actions  

The spending relates to the players union vs owner issues

Hard to spend high with high uncertainty. Once that gets resolved, we’ll have meaningful data on how Bowlen is willing to spend again.

by Summitgrad on Nov 1, 2010 4:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

Has anyone surveyed the quality of coaching staff working with our Head coach? How do they match up with leaguewide/divisional staffs? In terms of NFL experience/NFL wins etc .., how does our coaching staff stack up?
With Nolan,Thompson and Dennison quickly leaving, are coaches not interested in Denver? I know we have a coach directly from a high school positon on staff. Wink has never been an NFL coordinator. Head coach and GM have no experience in their current jobs.
Remember, Bolen’s win/ losses are equal to Shanny’s and McDaniels’ combined. The buck stops with Bolen-lately, its the bucks stop with Bolen-maybe he is the one in management that needs the most help doing his job.

by since61 on Nov 1, 2010 3:18 PM MDT reply actions  

Big mess getting bigger

A revolving door of coaches is not the answer, staying pat solves that issue. I posted lat week that a Napoleonic Regime also is not the answer but it seems that Bowlen is most comfortable in this situation. It looks like we are on a fast track of rebuilding a decent offense into a decent offense and a crappy Defense into a crappy defense. Meanwhile watching our team go 4-12 the last 16, trading picks for players who aren’t playing….hmmmmmm?

Who is worse McD the coach or GM?

The Pats are gaining draft picks from suckers like McX and The Vikings. AND they are still leading their division.

by Clompy on Nov 1, 2010 3:37 PM MDT reply actions  

Nice Letter to the Boss Tim,

While I agree we are certainly in a rebuilding mode now, I’m really disappointed in this teams inability to close a game out. This team is better than it’s results show. Now sure how to change, it is what it is I suppose. I give through 2011, but if this team isn’t progressing then somethings got to change, and that would most likely be the coach.

"I cannot give you a formula for success, but I can give you the formula for failure: Try to please everybody."

by bchiper on Nov 1, 2010 3:46 PM MDT reply actions  

I

just want to say my co-workers for the most part were jackasses today. One is a Squealers fan but she taunted me anyway. Sometimes, people aren’t smart.

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Nov 1, 2010 3:48 PM MDT reply actions  

Hey

let’s get Randy Moss /s/ nobody

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Nov 1, 2010 3:50 PM MDT reply actions  

Hear that? I think their crickets. :)

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

You had me at Hello(Mr. Bowlen)

This was a very well thought out letter and had all the points needed to back up your statements. I am on board and will ALWAYS continue to root for the Blue and Orange….I hope the light gets bigger sooner than later!

by the northerner on Nov 1, 2010 3:51 PM MDT reply actions  

It Will

because Mr. Bowlen is a classy gentleman who is also really smart! Most Edmonton Oilers are (not just the hockey team if you get my drift)

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Nov 1, 2010 3:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

Great piece, Tim. Rec'd in a huge way.

I’m surprised by the results of your poll, to be honest. When I left my computer last night, MHR was still a riot. If this poll was put up on Sunday, it would be closer to 90% no. Overall, I’m proud of the way that most of MHR has been able to quickly put their emotion and knee-jerk reactions on hold in favor of more rational opinions.

Of course, there are always outliers, but the fact that almost 70% of the voters said “stay the course” is very encouraging to me.

If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.

by Troy Hufford on Nov 1, 2010 3:52 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Thanks bud

the poll scared me too, but I had to know where the community was on this issue.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good Perspective

Although I still think you miss the mark on Shanahan. He had a potential winner in the works, just needed some better depth. Don’t forget that season we had 7 RB’s on the IR, and half our defense missed half the season! Firing Shanny was a bad move, made worse by the loss of Cutler and Marshall and Sheffler and Hillis (Shannahan had little trouble with those guys, and I think he would have developed Cutler much better than Lovie and Martz have in Chicago).

I’ve never liked McDaniels, and I still don’t. Still, the best chance the Broncos have to beceome one of those teams that win regularly (unlike the Raiders, Browns, Lions, or Redskins) is to stick with your coach for more than a couple years. The tools are there for future success – we just need organizational stability, especially as these 2 new team-builders do their work.
Look at our tools:
QB – Orton, playing well, and Tebow able to contribute now (plus potential future starter)
RB – Moreno, if he stays healthy, runs very well.
OL – very young starters: Clady, Walton, Beadles. Clady is one of the leagues best already.
WRs – need I list the good things here? Amazing group, best depth in the league.
CBs – young talent (Thompson, Cox, etc) and Champ is still one of the best
LBs – tons of talent (DJ Williams, Mario Hagen, etc) and when Elvis gets back, that’s an elite unit
DLine – needs some work, I’ll admit – but it’s hard to tell with a 3-4 front.
Safeties – Dawkins = Leadership. That is a BIG thing – it’s what the D lacked in ‘08 after Lynch was cut. It was the biggest improvement last year, and we really missed him vs Oakland. But, he’s getting old.

Additions of bulk on Oline and Dline (or development of talent) and some minor adjustments, plus talent development of players on the team – add better depth at RB (especially power runners) and a good TE and the Broncos could be a pretty good team in a year or two

by Summitgrad on Nov 1, 2010 4:17 PM MDT reply actions  

on paper this looks like a great list

so whats wrong? is it mainly the OL and Dline?

Better than Pick`em, free 10¢ CentSports Check it Out!!

by Sergio AppleSeed on Nov 1, 2010 6:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

in my opinion

yes

too many key injuries and not enough solid depth behind the rotational guys – as well as not enough experience on the offensive line which kills our running game.

Moreno I believe is a good back when healthy – he hits the holes (not that there are any) faster than our other backs. Our other backs aren’t necessarily bad, they just don’t have the explosion Moreno does coming out of his stance, which nets Moreno a couple yards per carry instead of being stopped at the line.

daaayuuuuum! you gonna take that KB?!? lol -Broncs55
Absolutely not. KB is a function of aggression and rage, the derivative of which can be traced back to my childhood.-KentuckyBronco
PS3 ID: KoRnHo|ed

by Broncs55 on Nov 1, 2010 7:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

Great article. Thanks for talking me off the ledge.

I think Josh should get one more year but if no improvements are made and there isn’t a great defensive draft then I’m not sure he should get a 4th, unless Tebow and D. Thomas light it up and we finally start scoring a lot of points on offense again. But still, a stellar defensive draft is a must. Give Wink some more weapons.

by BroncoMath101 on Nov 1, 2010 4:25 PM MDT reply actions  

every team

has bad years no matter what we shouild be 4-4 but the refs costs us NYJ and SF games some of u might say sour grapes but 4-4 wouild gave us a change DO NOT WATCH P T I they said denver will not win athoer game which is silly because we can win 4 or 5 more games this year yes we are done but we can play spoill in 10

okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider

by j-man on Nov 1, 2010 4:33 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Terton

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 9:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'd take that

We just need the technology to fuse them together. Ant engineers on the site?

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 1, 2010 10:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

"any" not "ant"

Though an ant engineer would be cool.

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Nov 2, 2010 12:26 AM MDT up reply actions  

I am a mechanical engineer

(I have a piece of paper that says so anyways) and i know kentuckybroncos is working on a bioengineering degree…

…It won’t be pretty, but I think we can do this. the project needs a cool name…

OPERATION TURDUCKEN

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 2, 2010 2:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

Broncoman is a structural engineer if I remember correctly

…So maybe we can put the Teborton on stilts or something….

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 2, 2010 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

i love orton

but we need to get Tebow 2-3 stars so we can build on 11

okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider

by j-man on Nov 2, 2010 2:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

Exactly J-man +!1

In reality there’s not a game on the remaining schedule that we can’t win.

"as in football so in life"

by asinsoin on Nov 1, 2010 4:41 PM MDT reply actions  

flip side being

There is probably not another game Denver will be favored in.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 4:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

Who

cares. That’s why upsets occur.

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Nov 1, 2010 4:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

My point was

First it was Jacksonville who Denver was suppose to beat, then Oakland, then SF. It gets old after awhile. At this point I dont know who they can beat. Buff? Maybe. Detroit? Doubt it.

Denver is the little fish now. And the big fish are circling them with mouths watering.

Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!

by johnnystarr on Nov 1, 2010 5:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

We have them right where we want them :)

Please please please, let teams start looking past us. A W is a W, right?

Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Don’t worry about it. As an ignorant redneck, I’m qualified to say that.

by Sean in Pa. on Nov 1, 2010 6:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yes, but they played IND tough, NYJ tough, and even had the SF game. If they were getting beat-up every game, then I would be worried.

by Auz on Nov 1, 2010 6:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not to mention that we actually won a couple too, lol

SEA and TEN were wins, that ain’t chopped liver. And correct me if I’m wrong but orton was …dare I say…clutch in that game?

Losing streaks suck, but they don’t last forever in the NFL, the teams are too good and too closely matched. We lost to 4 teams in a row, that doesn’t mean we HAVE to lose to a 5th

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 1, 2010 7:23 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good post Tim, but had to vote no on weathering the storm!

If ownership brought in someone like Parcells to oversee McD then it might work. Imo, the current situation is a nightmare both on and off the field for McKid.

by rocko1 on Nov 1, 2010 4:43 PM MDT reply actions  

If ownership brought in someone like Parcells to oversee McD....

I agree with that idea. It would certainly help the man develop as a man and a leader. It might also save the franchise from another disappointing season, or more.

by MoB.DeadMeat on Nov 3, 2010 5:08 AM MDT up reply actions  

Thanks Zappa err.... Tim

This was a much needed and a well considered post. I know it’s very hard for people to keep a balanced perspective in hard times especially with the MSM driving such a negative message for the current coach. However for those who view more than the immediate outcome who also understand that things can get worse, your analysis is accurate and timely. Rec’d and thank you. And for those who thought this post was throwing Shanny under the bus, I just don’t see it. This was a very fair and rational piece.

"as in football so in life"

by asinsoin on Nov 1, 2010 4:52 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks man!

That was my goal(the fair and rational part). I am just glad my opinion is generally accepted by the majority for a change. lol

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 6:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

No worries man

I’m sure you’ll get back on the majorities wrong side next post!

"as in football so in life"

by asinsoin on Nov 1, 2010 11:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ha! No doubt.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 2, 2010 7:26 AM MDT up reply actions  

Leave it to Tim

Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.

by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 2, 2010 2:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

Nice job Tim...

Stay the course, but bring in help to mentor Xanders and McD…and for crimanees sake……START THE ROOKIES!

You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!

"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"

Harv Neptune.

by boydy2669 on Nov 1, 2010 5:06 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks Tim

I appreciate the piece and agree in allowing time. I also note some positive signs though nothing overwhelming. I think my expectations are more what have set me up. The 6-0 last year greatly blinded me and raised my hopes. The reality I missed then and am seeing repeated is the lack of depth which can only be created through the draft. McDaniels and Xanders have made some nice acquisitions through free agency and I feel Denver can match up well when healthy 11 on 11. Unfortunately you need more then 11 on each side to survive in today’s NFL.
Bowlen has way more information then we do and I trust he will make a good call. Heck I was shocked when Shanahan was fired as I thought we were in good shape. Bowlen showed by that move that he has a feel for what this team needs and I will trust him.

by JWink on Nov 1, 2010 5:09 PM MDT reply actions  

The looming work stoppage

throws so much uncertainty into the mix that we really have little choice but to stay the course after this season. Bowlen and the other owners are keeping their wallets shut until the situation is resolved, so a new HC and/or GM are not likely. Even if they manage to salvage an abbreviated season next year, the limited time for free agency and training camp diminishes the impact from new players on our roster.

At least the offensive line should theoretically improve with more experience as a unit and a full offseason of strength and conditioning work for Walton and Beadles. The defensive line, however, needs additional help. If we can somehow fortify the DL, that will help both our LBs and our secondary.

by Broncologist on Nov 1, 2010 5:18 PM MDT reply actions  

Well played Tim!

Rome was not built in a day, no?

daaayuuuuum! you gonna take that KB?!? lol -Broncs55
Absolutely not. KB is a function of aggression and rage, the derivative of which can be traced back to my childhood.-KentuckyBronco
PS3 ID: KoRnHo|ed

by Broncs55 on Nov 1, 2010 5:19 PM MDT reply actions  

It is fine to clean house

of all of Shanahan’s players but when you do a pitiful job of drafting, trades, and free agent signings to replace them you are still in the same boat as you were when you took over for Shanny and this is the worst defense I have ever seen the Broncos put on the field and I have been a fan for over 30 years. And the offense isn’t much better and that is what is really disappointing since McD was supposed to be an offensive genius. Also, AJ Smith may be a jackass and has a hard time getting free agents to go to San Diego but the man is pretty good at draft time. If AJ Smith were in charge of the Broncos last 2 drafts I have no doubt we would be in a lot better shape. Bowlen needs to hire a quality GM with the power to make all roster moves. Until that happens we are going nowhere and will be one of the worst teams in the nfl. I would be all in favor of hiring Ted Sundquist or someone like him to have full control over all roster moves!!

by broncorob on Nov 1, 2010 5:26 PM MDT reply actions  

One point

on Sundquist I forgot to mention is I think Shanahan didn’t listen to Sundquist enough during draft and free agency but if he came back and had full control over the roster he would do a good job.

by broncorob on Nov 1, 2010 5:29 PM MDT reply actions  

I really don't give a rat's patooie.....

about Shanahan. “He ain’t here no more”. He is gone.

Why can people blame McD for the numbskull “block” by Moss? The “Chop Boick” was a farcical call. The PI aginst the Jets was BS. The call in the Jags game was nuts.

Yep. I think that the “bad team” rep drives the refs to make stupid calls. Sort of a “Curse of Ed Hoculi” against this team………

I’m sticking with McD. It will get better…..

by Gulbrand on Nov 1, 2010 5:39 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Don't Forget

Moreno was ROYALLY screwed in the queen’s hometown as well…

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Nov 2, 2010 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

and of course

my man Eddie ROYALLY screwed was jammed unfairly. Of course Dierdork says it was obvious, just like all the things the Jets did right when they came to INVESCO

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Nov 2, 2010 12:44 PM MDT up reply actions  

Tim, thanks for the voice of reason. Rec'd

There’s a reason growing pains are called “pains”. It hasn’t been sunshine and roses being a Bronco’s fan this year, but I still believe it will get better. Anyway, as you so eloquently pointed out…what’s the alternative?

As for the rest of this year, here’s hoping McD and the other coaches continue to grow into their role, the youngsters on this team get more playing time, and the injured players heal completely. My playoff hopes have been pushed out to next year now…

by JoePlummer on Nov 1, 2010 7:46 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks! You summed my sentiments up perfectly.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 8:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

Great, great, great!

Best Broncos article I’ve read this year, anywhere. Makes complete sense and really puts this franchises progress in perspective. I feel Mr. Bowlen will not fire McDaniels or X…in-fact I think he will come out and give his 100% confidence in both of them.
As Bronco fans we are eager to win but the process of building a CONSTANT contender takes time.

by CastorTroy on Nov 1, 2010 8:19 PM MDT via mobile reply actions  

I am honored!

Though I am wary of any public statements of confidence in the coaching staff from an owner – even our own. lol

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 8:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

great post

I see a glass that's twice as big as it needs to be.

by grind_core on Nov 1, 2010 9:06 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks everyone for the kind words.

As Broncos fans its important during the darkest periods to circle the wagons around the team we love. That doesn’t mean we can’t be critical of the team, as I will continue doing so, but being critical and advocating actions that would harm the development of the team are two different things. This is why I hoped most of the fan base would vote yes in this poll and I am very happy to see this is the case.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 1, 2010 9:15 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

well said

http://www.centsports.com/ref/698077/Joe_Vick

If you think you know sports, try betting here for free.
I'm up to 3 dollars!

by Whidbey Bronco on Nov 1, 2010 10:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thanks Tim

I feel like I have been blue in the face preaching this in other places. You put it very eloquently.

My brain hurts.

by Thnikkaman on Nov 1, 2010 9:27 PM MDT reply actions  

A fighting chance

I read this article and it was something I needed to lift my spirits.

These past few years have been brutal for me going through divorce and the financial destruction that brought down on me. The economy has been hard on a lot of people- 3 or 4 houses within a stones throw of mine are for sale and have been for 2 years. It’s a down time and I want the Broncos to fight. I want to watch them on Sundays and forget about my sorrows for a little while.

If they go 1-15 that’s alright… just so long as they look like they’re fighting for it. This team, I watch them and the feeling I get is, “What a struggle. Wouldn’t it just be easier to give up and lay down?” From the way Orton just seems to be out there robotically doing his job, the way the O-line can’t push the D back and run the ball, the way the defense plays so passively, even Champ Bailey bothers me, the way he has no fire in him. He may be great but he just seems to be hands off when it comes to the defense as a whole. Where are the leaders on this team?

If the Broncos were a person they’d be drunk in a dark room trying to sleep off a broken heart.

I can’t watch it.

McDaniels was right not to pay Marshall and I don’t miss Cutler either but I’m not sure I can watch any more of this. It’s like watching your mom turn into a heroin addict on close circuit TV and I keep hoping things will turn around but it just gets worse and worse.

He’s one of the few Broncos I can stand right now. At least he looks like he’s really suffering when the Broncos are blowing games and he’s got spirit. He’s smart and knows what he’s doing.

Moreno is the same way. He looks like he’s ready to run through a wall for me.

I hope they trade Orton and Bailey and get some pass rushers. Then, even if we don’t win another game at least we can beat the hell out of the opposition. Win or lose, I want that opposing team to leave the stadium feeling like they got their butts kicked.

Blitz every play on D, find some O lineman who can hit and knock a guy on his butt and give me some FIRE!

My life is a good one and I’m happy most of the time but I need a break from the daily grind at times and this Broncos team just gives me the blues.

A shrug of the shoulders and a “Well, we’ll just try again next week.” isn’t something I want to see much more of.

Thanks Tim for trying to cheer up Bronco nation.

Here’ s what I’m talking about- some B Dawk to keep me from falling asleep in the cold.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx6M26LDXDM&feature=related

by ddtraveller on Nov 1, 2010 10:18 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Great article - thanks for posting this Tim

"All credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the senses." Friedrich Nietzsche

by Horsepower on Nov 1, 2010 10:48 PM MDT reply actions  

Doesn't someone first have to be a man

in order to be emasculated? Sorry Norv. The San Diego locker room confused Test with Estrogen.

by PaleHorse78 on Nov 2, 2010 12:07 AM MDT reply actions  

Football IQ

This post makes a case that McDaniels inherited a tough position. If the premise is right then: If McDaniel succeeds, we should be impressed and if he fails we should be more understanding because he failed at something that was difficult.

The question, though, is how well they’ll do at this difficult task. I agree it’s early to just fire the coach and GM, but I’m still waiting to see that the following points are true:

That they have "huge potential and tremendous football IQ"

That "[t]he up and down nature of their performance is more indicative of their learning curve than an indictment of some inability to do their job."

They may be true statements, and I agree that there hasn’t been time to judge them fully. But eventually, football IQ is as football IQ does: i.e., they’ll have to start winning more games than the apparently talent-less teams that preceded them.

by belmbo on Nov 2, 2010 5:32 AM MDT reply actions  

Tim you and I flow on the same page a lot

GOOD ARTICLE

I am wondering if a top 10 draft choice (of our own) is maybe the wake up call we need for our team. We have been fortunate to be out of the top 10 in draft slots for many years now. I am wondering if this may be the wake up call we need! Draft a stud NT and never look back!

Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!

"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown

by Jon Tollerud on Nov 2, 2010 11:39 AM MDT reply actions  

you know, the Patriots did that way back when they traded for a 1st rounder that ended up like 8th..

they nabbed Vince Wilkfork.

Long time ago though, so I might be wrong.

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 2, 2010 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

was that the san fan pick?

What I meant was the pick we have the one assigned to our team the one we earned in the top 10

Dear Santa- All I want for Christmas is a Stud NT and David Harris- Thank you!

Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!

"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown

by Jon Tollerud on Nov 2, 2010 8:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

same diff, but yeah it was the SF pick.

We draft the next Vince Wilfork…I hope one is available! lol

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 2, 2010 8:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

oh tim

just wait dude MHR- U extra credit is gonna make you drool!

Dear Santa- All I want for Christmas is a Stud NT and David Harris- Thank you!

Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!

"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown

by Jon Tollerud on Nov 2, 2010 8:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

I miss Steve...he was supposed to have some extra time in November...

If anyone was to carry on the torch though, it would have to be you man. :)

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The artist formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Nov 2, 2010 8:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

im not the teach

just the sub! Extra Credit baby!

Dear Santa- All I want for Christmas is a Stud NT and David Harris- Thank you!

Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!

"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown

by Jon Tollerud on Nov 2, 2010 9:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Imgres_small
Are You Nuts? No Plan B?
Oc_small
I NEED YOUR HELP MHR: The Down Under Bowl

Recent FanPosts

Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick Really Worth? Pt. 2.
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
Glad for Gronkowski
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick REALLY Worth?
Index_small
Nate Irving!
Fhgfhgfhg_small
Rod Smith is a Hall of Famer....Right?
205783_109706759113985_100002239833864_101133_7230028_n_small
My Final 53
00000021_small
J-Man 2012 NFL preview First of 3 Editions
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Payette_011_small
3 X 80 = ???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Broncos-von-miller_small Scotty Payne

Ph_small BroncoPH

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall