Broncos Should Be Putting in Waiver Claims On Moss/Merriman
I don't want to hear that we already have Jabar Gaffney, so Randy Moss is not needed. He isn't going to limit jack squat on this team, he will only make us better on the field. The only quibble would be that he is a guy who needs the ball in order to keep him happy.
What NFL receiver isn't?
I'm not saying I think the Broncos have to sign Randy Moss because they need a wide receiver, but there are multiple reasons why this team should sign him.
Not only that, but Shawne Merriman is also set to hit waivers today. I am and have been of the opinion that we should pick him up as well. There are also a few reasons for that. I'm sure many of you have formed your opinion before you even read the rest of what I'm going to say, but if you have an open mind, follow me after the jump.
Reasons to Sign Randy Moss
1. The Chargers, Chiefs, and Raiders cannot get him
To me, this is reason enough alone to sign Moss. Forget his poor statistics, there is no question that Moss can play. Did you see how much better he made Percy Harvin? Brett Favre definitely enjoyed having Moss. The Chargers, Chiefs, and Raiders are all in the playoff race, and even though some of you don't want to hear it, we also mathematically are still in the playoff race, and we're getting healthy. Crazy things have happened in the NFL, and we never thought we'd blow our lead last year, so why can't it happen this year?
You can't plan on having a top ten pick halfway through the season, and we need to make SURE we beat our division rivals. If Moss is allowed to go to San Diego, Philip Rivers makes him a great player. The Chiefs have wanted him, and he has connections there. It's a place he could feel comfortable. The Raiders aren't a good passing team, but they are winning (dominating) right now, and Randy Moss also makes them better.
Just because we have Brandon Lloyd doesn't mean we couldn't use Moss.
2. He Makes Brandon Lloyd that much better
Lloyd is probably going to start receiving extra attention. Jabar Gaffney is a good receiver, but he's far more useful as an interior guy, getting open in the middle of the field than he is as a complimentary deep threat. I want to see Demaryius Thomas get better, but he's being brought along very, very slowly.
Moss is a deep threat and Kyle Orton throws a fine deep ball. I don't think this would be a bad move in terms of adding to our WR corps, which we already lost Matt Willis and Eddie Royal is also oft-injured. Moss is added depth.
3. He knows the coach AND the offense
McDaniels was Moss' coordinator when he had the single greatest season performance of a wide receiver in this league. McDaniels is familiar with Moss and vice versa.
Moss is not a fit for the Vikings' offense, which is a west coast system. We have some of that in our offense, but for the most part, this is the offense he played in at New England all the way.
4. "He's not a lineman or a running back, so NO"
I don't care. We are not a running team, plain and simple. Despite the fact that Moreno runs hard, McDaniels refuses to stick to the run. If we're going to flippin pass the ball 50 times a game, we might as well have more than one legitimate playmaker on the outside. I think Thomas can eventually be that guy, but right now, we're moving slower than I thought we would with him. Plus, the amount of times we throw the ball, it would be nice to have a veteran who can go deep other than just Lloyd.
5. Compensatory draft picks
Adam Schefter made a great point. Whatever team claims Moss is going to likely get at least a decent compensatory pick at the end of the year in exchange for his services. This is essentially a free draft pick for the Broncos should they choose to sign him. We have no obligation to keep him around at the end of the year.
6. Contract year
Moss is in a contract year, and has been let go by two teams. If that's not motivation, he's not going to get even a decent final contract in this league. How about a motivated Randy Moss on a team that throws the ball 40-50 times a game?
Gimme!
7. Not giving up
Bringing in Moss would be a step in the right direction for this team in that it shows McDaniels and company have not given up, and there's no reason to. We are still getting healthy, and despite how "great" our passing game has been, we are not scoring touchdowns. Moss scores touchdowns, plain and simple.
There are definitely negatives to signing Moss on, but McDaniels has dealt with him before, and succeeded.
The pro's are even more evident for signing Shawne Merriman, an outside linebacker the Broncos desperately need.
1. We have no pass rush
Does anything else need to be said? Robert Ayers is out, Elvis Dumervil is out, and Jarvis Moss has NOT provided anything. Jason Hunter leads the team with three sacks...Through 8 games.
2. Merriman is HEALTHY
This is something he has not been since 2008, very early on in the process. He is a physical freak, and despite what you guys may think, he's still a young player. He is finally healthy now, and the Broncos need all the help they can get on the outside.
A healthy Merriman led the league in sacks over a three year span.
3. He is young and motivated
The Chargers dumping Merriman is a very strong message to send a guy. They have given up on their once Pro Bowl athlete. Merriman is going to be ticked off and motivated to knock the crap out of some quarterbacks.
Yes please!
4. Not expensive
Merriman will cost only about $1.7-1.8 million for 8 games this year. If he can provide a semblance of a pass rush for us, he is worth the gamble.
5. Future
If Merriman plays well, the Broncos can re-sign him for a reasonable price and keep him as a rotation guy going forward, or they can let him go to the highest bidder and again get a compensation pick. Merriman's name alone will get him a decent deal on the open market, so this would be a good move by the Broncos to buy low.
I think signing these two players would show that our front office and coaching staff are serious about winning. I think they already are anyways, but these are low risk moves that I think the Broncos should make.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
151 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ok, heres one...
Which is priority. Once we put in a claim and win, we move to the bottom of the list.
So, it would be hard to get both, so whos your priority?
I’d say Merriman then Moss (We may get lucky)
Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.
by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Nov 2, 2010 2:31 PM MDT reply actions
Yeah, I'd agree
I couldn’t find that info anywhere, so I didn’t know that was the case. If I had to pick one, it’d be Merriman, but Moss is very intriguing.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:16 PM MDT up reply actions
I have still been unable to uncover such a rule
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:49 PM MDT up reply actions
it's not the rule
The rule is based purely on record. If the Bills put a claim on both they would get both due to their record. The rule Chuck is talking about is how fantasy sports waiver wires work but NFL is based only on record.
by gamblingprospectus on Nov 2, 2010 5:32 PM MDT up reply actions
You have some valid reasons, but I vote to pass on both.
Moss and Merriman are still good, but both are drama queens imo. Just don’t need more distractions on this team.
Who is currently a distraction?
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:16 PM MDT up reply actions
Dis
A
Gree
I do not. repeat. Do….Not…
think Moss would be good for this team at ALL. I think that you make a great argument with wonderful points, but in the end….I think it all boils down to character. If he was not such a cry baby do you think the Vikes would have dumped him after 2-3 weeks?
If he was such a top talent, wouldn’t NE have kept him longer?
If he was able to turn teams around so well wouldn’t he have stayed in Minnesota?
What in the world makes you think he can come to Denver, a losing team mind you, and be happy enough to be a decent guy in the locker room. Let’s be realistic here.
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
You make some good points
1. I don’t think the Vikings made a good decision cutting Moss. He was helping their passing game. Obviously he wasn’t the “missing piece” but he was decently productive in an offense which he is not a fit, and he made other players around him better.
2. I don’t think he will turn us around single-handedly (ha, ironic), but I think he can provide a spark to the offense in some capacity.
3. I don’t think Moss is a saint, but he’s definitely not a locker room cancer or anything. The majority of Vikings players loved him, and same in New England. Just because he speaks his mind doesn’t mean he’s a bad teammate. Does he have baggage? Yeah, but you can’t be that picky in this league, or you will never succeed. He’s not getting in trouble with the law or anything. Now that he’s been waived, he has to accept the fact that he’s probably not going to go t oa team with a winning record. If he does, he is LUCKY.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:21 PM MDT up reply actions
yeah
we need that guy in the red zone (which we are terrible in) to be able to through it up to. or at least distract the defense. i think its worth a try. only costs us money not draft picks. unlike moroney. we need a spark!
belicheck
“sure you can have my washed up, no good running back. i’ll gladly stockpile more draft picks..” then proceeds to laugh all the way to the draft.
I see a glass that's twice as big as it needs to be.
all the character guys we have
and we are 2-6. bring ‘em on. we need help. so sick of the “character” argument. it’s not getting us very far.
I see a glass that's twice as big as it needs to be.
We are missing key players
and our scheme is missing key pieces that we/it needs to start gellin. Adding Moss is not the answer. Adding B-Marsh is not the asnwer.
Lloyd is making catches Marshall doesn’t make on his best day. Not because he can’t, because he is too arrogant. Same with Moss.
Moss is king with the one hander sure. But when in the last couple years have you seen him make the circus act catches contorting his body and laying out like Lloyd has this season?
I think BL trumps BM and RM.
When we get our Defense healthy, we will stand a MUCH better chance, so here’s to 2011.
Still hopeful for a good 2010 mind you, but I’m confident 2011 is going to be great (knock on wood)
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
Brandon Lloyd is playing very well
But Moss is a future Hall of Famer and if Marshall stays at his present level he will be as well. I’m happy we have Lloyd but you are crazy to think he’s better then either Marshall or Moss.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
I only meant
That Brandon Lloyd is playing at a higher level in MY OPINION than either of the other two are this year.
I’m not trying to say he is better player overall, and historically he has had faults, but I do think he is the best option of the 3 AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME alone.
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
Okay then you are correct
Lloyd is playing great football this season for the same reason Orton is, we throw it a lot. Marshall and Moss have or will have great careers, Lloyd is having the better season though.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
If he had
played at this level his entire career, he would be in the same discussion as the other two.
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
Yep, but beside his character issues
And other problems have held him back. Glad he’s playing the way he is though.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
No to Moss
Anyone read the story about him abusing the caterers today? Not really a class act.
Plus, its time to get DT on the field.
Its anchorman not anchorlady. And that is a scientific FACT!
Why so he can drop the ball?
Sorry, it’s kind of becoming a joke. But I do agree, no Moss.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
I do agree.....DT drops balls
and not in the good way
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
Hell no to Moss, Yes to Merriman
Moss is not going to generate that high of a compensatory pick because he basically will have limited to no production this year, you got rid of a headache in BM and you bring in a guy who is basically the same guy, except older and less explosive, what will that say to the people on the team, basically you can act like a jack-ass, me first guy if you used to play for the Patriots, but if you didn’t guess what, your ass is out of here, you would kill the locker room and basically make every player who is not a former Pat hate Josh McDaniels guts to the core.
Merriman is worth a shot because he fits a need, he has something to prove, and he will get some shots on SD,
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
by Broncoman on Nov 2, 2010 2:37 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
+1
None of us go out and play for stats. You just do whatever you can to help the team out. -- Eddie Royal
by Poster_Formerly_Known_As_Royal_Fan on Nov 2, 2010 2:43 PM MDT up reply actions
I think Moss is more explosive than BM...
BM is a glorified possession receiver. Moss is a legitimate deep threat. Different skill sets, but I agree with your point that he does no good for us and I think you make a great point about McD bringing in another ex-pat and the affect that has on morale.
Let me add this also
Do you think Pat Bowlen wants to shell out an extra $3.0 million for a player that will probably destroy the locker room, get the coach fired, and give you no more production or help you win any more games?
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
With all due respect, I believe you are way off on Moss and his value to this team
1) Moss would take Lloyd’s position within the offense –
Moss is a vertical route runner, who does not run the complete route tree. He will not play the role that Gaffney plays because that is an intermediate route role. Gaffney goes over the middle and Moss has no interest in doing this.
Moss will not play the slot position that Royal plays.
Thus Moss will either play the role of Demaryius Thomas (no chance of this, because he is not playing 20 snaps an entire game without a complete mental breakdown) or he will replace Lloyd.
I honestly can not see how someone can advocate removing an excellent team player like Lloyd who is arguably a better player than Moss anyways at this stage in their careers and is without a doubt a more consistent player.
2) Who do you want the Broncos to cut? – If we bring in Moss then who do we cut. This team is already stretched thin all over the roster and their is really not much room to take on Moss without getting rid of a receiver. This is all before even factoring in that Moss does not play special teams.
We are already shaky at special teams, so who do we de-activate inorder to have Moss active?
Whoever it is, he will be a core special teams player and that hurts big time.
3) We already have a tall speedster who does not run many routes in Demaryius Thomas. At least Thomas is a willing blocker, does not shy away from contact and is the exact opposite of Moss in the Locker room. Playing Moss will come at the expense of playing time to Thomas and Decker. While their development is hardly the issue here, it is a small thing to consider
4) We have been very financially concious to this point – Paying Moss what his contract is worth does not make sense for this regime, given what they can likely expect to receive in production.
5) Teams that have two wins need to focus on their own business – Why bother worrying about what the Cheifs, Raiders and Chargers are doing. We need to focus on fixing the issues within the organization. Bringing in an extreme locker room cancer to a situation that is on the brink of complete and utter disaster (McDaniels losing this team beyond a point of salvation) just to prevent a division rival from getting him is not justifiable. All that without even mentioning the wonderful influence he will be on our young players. Most reports are that he is well liked in locker rooms, but the example on sundays that dogging it is acceptable can not be ignored.
6) How many teams need to look like idiots for bringing this guy in and realizing that he does not offer nearly enough on the field for what he is being paid and the head aches he causes – If he quit on the Vikings, and the Patriots felt they were a better offense without his big plays because they would get a steady performer in Branch then why does anyone think he will be an upgrade over Lloyd on a 2-win team. If he was dogging it from time to time in the past on teams with legit Super Bowl aspirations, then he may not even attend the games for Denver.
In the end Moss is just a big name with a good Madden rating, but he makes very little business sense for the Broncos and almost no football sense.
by DW76 on Nov 2, 2010 2:47 PM MDT reply actions 13 recs
+1
Great points! I tend to feel similarly regarding Merriman, I just don’t think he has shown enough since being busted for PED’s to be worthy of picking him up and cutting someone else that may be young with potential.
At 2-6 we need to focus on healing and trying to fix the problems we have executing the game plans. If we end up 4-12, 6-10 or even 10-6 somehow we will likely be better off next year and beyond for not picking up either of these two headaches.
1. No, he wouldn’t. He and Lloyd are not the same player, though they have similar skill sets. Having Moss on the other side takes pressure off of him.
2. Chris Clark, Stanley Daniels, Kevin Alexander, Kyle McCarthy, Jarvis Moss…take your pick.
3. OK, fine, then why is Demaryius not getting on the field?
4. Financially conscious? Depends. We have spent a LOT of money in FA and the draft, and haven’t gotten tons of production.
5. I’m not saying we’re worrying about the other teams, but we still have to compete against them. This is a competition.
6. He didn’t quit on the Vikings, the Vikings quit on him.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:25 PM MDT up reply actions
1) It is a numbers game. If you have Lloyd and Moss on the outside and Royal in the slot then Gaffney is not on the field. An offense that is sending two guys deep with noone able to attack the middle of the field consistently from the outside is not effective. If you want to play 4-WR sets all game then that is just a mistake anyways that goes without saying.
In the numbers game, when you bring Moss on the field you lose the intermediate specialties of Gaffney. If you bring Moss on the field instead of Lloyd then you are taking out our best WR. If you choose to play Moss sparingly then your asking for trouble, and if you ask for trouble then you deserve what you get.
2) There are definitely guys that can be cut. Your right about that. The tougher thing is finding out who you want to de-activate, and handicap an already lackluster special teams unit to have Moss on the field. It was a mistake on my part to suggest that there is not room on the team for Moss, because there is.
3) Thomas is not on the field for whatever reason, I have no clue. I dont think anyone really does outside of the Broncos building. Your right in that regard, I would hope he gets on the field more and if he does he will be doing all the things Moss is asked to do (with a bit less skill, and not even a speck of the experience) but he will also be doing things that Moss can not or does not seem to be able to do. Such as blocking, or putting in maximum effort.
4) We have not spent alot of money in the draft. In general draft picks are paid less than Free Agents or players receiving their second contract when you are picking outside of the top-10. We have been very good in Free Agency (obviously Jarvis Green is the prime example against this), but production from Free Agency has been good to excellent. Bannan, Jamal Williams, Andre Goodman (when healthy), Dawkins, Haggan, Gaffney, Lloyd, Hunter, and Vickerson have all been excellent additions for what they cost to acquire. Even guys like Buckhalter, and Hill have played poorly this season but were very solid last year.
Nate Jones has been a bit of a disappointment (I only say “a bit” because I have a hard time coming up with a reason why we were excited about him in the first place.)
6) This is up for debate. I would point to him short arming the 4th down pass at the end of the Packers game. Was it catchable, maybe not.
Was it 4th down at the end of the game and he doesnt jump his highest or extend his arms fully……. tough to say that is not the case.
Look, you make great points
I just think the positives outweigh the negatives here.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:49 PM MDT up reply actions
On #1 though
I think right now we’re using a ton of 2 TE sets to mask the deficiencies of our OL. We’re also putting Gronk in as a FB/H-Back and it has not been effective in the passing game. Orton has been getting pressured far too often even WITH extra blockers. maybe if we put Moss and Lloyd on the outside, Royal and Gaffney on the inside and ran quicker routes, teams wouldn’t send as much pressure.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:51 PM MDT up reply actions
It would certainly be an unorthidox style of offense to run extensively.
I don’t know what I think of this. My main concern is that the pressure is coming from the inside of the pocket. Orton can step up in the pocket extremely well and avoid exterior pass rush, but when the pocket is pushed into him he tends to struggle. This all comes down to how pathetic our LG is and the learning on the fly that Walton is doing.
The biggest concern I guess that i would have with this offense is that some of our OL need to have help because they can’t hold up 1-on-1 with a starting quality defensive lineman for any real length of time. Rushing 4 or 5 would still get plenty of pressure and that leaves 6 or 7 guys available for coverage.
It is an interesting idea to say the least. If we were a more effective running team then it would scare teams into leaving LBs on the field. This running game does not do that at all though
I like it
But you couldn’t do it often because we say it last week, they could get to Orton in under two seconds with extra help, it’s might be quicker if they see no extra blockers.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Right, that's what I'm saying
Then you start throwing quick passes to guys like DT, Royal, Moss to offset that pressure. Teams keep bringing extra guys cause they know we can’t pick it up and we have to keep extra dudes in to block. IDK, I just think we need to get our offense back. We can’t keep babying Beadles along, in my opinion. If he’s going to be our future QB’s blindside blocker, we’re not preparing him all that well.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 4:05 PM MDT up reply actions
I'd rather not worry about the passing offense
And fix our lines and defensive front seven. Money spent on Moss could be spent on a player that could fill a hole. When you have a team, you fix the holes before upgrading the areas that are stable.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
You keep throwing out the Tebow bait.
Farther down in this thread it was a sly comment about how a certain line of thinking will help get more for Orton in a trade.
Now here it is with Beadles protecting the future QBs blindside.
Tebow was drafted to be the future of the franchise, no arguing that.
I have a question though. You speak as if it is a foregone conclusion that Tebow will become this future.
So, do you believe that we will keep Orton around until Tebow proves it on the field?
or do you believe that Tebow just by virtue of being the 25th overall pick will get the starting job next season?
We all know what we have in Orton, and it is not bad at all. We don’t know what we have in Tebow (on paper it would seem to be better), but there were alot of people who did not think Tebow would work.
My biggest problem with the Pro-Tebow camp is not that they believe in the guy (because he is a proven winner and one of the best ever in college, so you can’t blame them for that) it’s that this group of people assume he is going to be great.
At some point we may have to give way to the idea that he needs to do something on the field to warrant this type of talk
that's always true
You’re always going to have an unknown with a newer, younger quarterback, and it’s always a risk.
It also comes with the reality that switching to the newer qb is going to have both more downside and more upside. Cutler lost a game or two that Plummer would have won that first season (of course, you could also argue that’s been true for Cutler’s entire career). But Elway had some awful early games, too.
Yah for sure
I have no problem with Tebow playing as the starter at this point in the season. Especially if we lose the next two.
Im just saying that I hope we get to see what we have in Tebow, while Orton is still on the team.
I would hate to see Tebow flop and then realize all we have on the roster as an alternative is Brady Quinn.
Orton gives us the luxury of finding out what we have in Tebow without completely mortgaging the future. Another loss or two this season, expecially within the division might also give the perfect oppurtunity to bring Tebow in.
One thing is for sure, there may not be a better evaluator of QBs and developer of them on this planet then Mcdaniels. If he is ready to go with Tebow as his only option then that is good enough for me, because he saw something in Orton and Cassell that noone else saw.
Moss
From PFF:
On the surface, Moss and Rice look like they had similar seasons last year. They saw a similar number of snaps, were separated by fewer than 60 receiving yards in the regular season, and had only one catch separating them. The difference came in how those catches came about. Rice received a PFF grade of +22.0 for his receiving work, Moss just +7.2.
Rice was thrown at 120 times in the ’09 regular season and only one interception came from those throws. Moss was thrown at 15 times more, but seven interceptions came from the throws intended for Moss.
The only players in the NFL to have more interceptions recorded when they were the primary target were Calvin Johnson (12), Carolina’s Steve Smith (11), Antonio Bryant (10), Reggie Wayne (10), and Terrell Owens (eight). Four of those five players were playing with quarterbacks (or multiple quarterbacks) who threw for 19 or more interceptions on the season. Tom Brady threw 13 interceptions last season, which means more than half of them were intended for Moss.
Of those 138 targets, Rice dropped just three balls last season. Moss dropped eight. In 2008 he dropped 11, and this season he has already registered a drop in each of his opening four games. Moss is no longer a safe target for quarterbacks looking to get rid of the ball; if anything, he is becoming more of a risk as time goes on.
Much was made of Moss getting off of Revis Island in Week 2 this season with a beautiful one-handed catch for a touchdown, but that doesn’t tell the story of that game. Moss was thrown at 10 times, recorded just one 4-yard reception outside of that touchdown, and dropped a ball. Not only that, but Brady was picked off twice in the game when throwing towards Moss.
This season, Moss has been thrown at 23 times, and recorded just nine receptions. His yards-per-reception average remains healthy at 15.4, but just three plays account for 101 of his 139 yards. His average yards per target is a flimsy 6.04 yards. The first big catch came on a quick screen against the Bengals in Week 1. The second was that one-handed catch over Revis against the Jets in Week 2. Without taking anything away from a spectacular catch, Revis was visibly troubled by his hamstring, and the Jets have since suggested there was a blown coverage on that play. His longest play from scrimmage this season was a 35-yard touchdown against the Buffalo Bills, beating coverage from Reggie Corner in the slot. Moss lined up outside with Aaron Hernandez behind him, and Corner never got into a good position, trailing the play the entire way.
Too many old players
I can see Merriman working out and would be a fine pick up for us at this point and really no harm no foul if it doesn’t work…I can see this but prob not Moss…I would’ve been on board a couple years ago maybe but not sure that his presence (and I’ll say I think he’s been misunderstood all this time so I don’t think he’s necess a locker room distraction outside of the media’s portrayal) would do all that well for the talented young guys we have from Eddie to Demaryius to Eric Decker…they need the time on the field!! I feel (although the fan in me says hell ya…the coach in me says not an effective decision at this time!!!) it would only exacerbate the potential (which is a bad word among coaches)being fulfilled!
Both would be that guy I hate if they play for someone else but I will be stoked to see Merriman revive his career here…btw Sayre…I’ll say it for you cuz’ I know you wanted to…he’ll be fired up to destroy the mouthy lil Phyllis Cry Me a Rivers…can you imagine having to practice with that guy everyday…he’d like that chance I’m sure being on another team…and especially on one team they hate!! Bring it on…DO IT!!!
by Omniscient Orange on Nov 2, 2010 3:18 PM MDT reply actions
Just want to point this out.
His testing positive for a banned substance resulted in a 4 game suspension to start the 2006 season. After returning he had 17 sacks in 12 games that year.
Prior to the testing positive, he tested clean on 19 of 20 random drug tests since entering the league.
2007 he had 13.5 sacks
2008 he was injured w/ a tear in both his posterior cruciate ligament and lateral collateral ligament (IR basically missed season)
2009 returning from his surgery the year prior, plus foot injurys – 4 sacks
2010 NOW
Just wanted to point out that he was performing damn good AFTER testing positive for a banned substance, and prior to his injury in 2008.
Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.
by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Nov 2, 2010 3:47 PM MDT up reply actions
Great point
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:50 PM MDT up reply actions
And to sum it up...
Career NFL statistics as of Week 17, 2010
Tackles 231
Sacks 54
INTs 1
Yes, put in a waiver claim.
(Prior to the start of the year the Chargers put a 1st and 3rd round tender on him)
Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.
by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Nov 2, 2010 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions
Also a very good point
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:53 PM MDT up reply actions
yes, but...
the theory is that former steroid usage also makes a player much more susceptible to injury. But still, if that’s true, I figure go ahead and put him on the field until he breaks down again.
When was the last time the Broncos had a comp
You do know that in order to get one a team has to have a net lost in the free agency period right?
IMO
Yes
What’s your point? Do you think we’re going to sign a bunch of free agents again?
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions
Not saying we won't
Just wondering if that’s something that you’re predicting.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions
I have no clue what the Broncos front office will do
After all the bouncing around they did in the draft, and the FA acquisitions not much would surprise me. I was just pointing out that the comp pick would only materialize if the Broncos had a net lose in the FA period. Something I think this franchise hasnt done, at least lately. But I could be wrong hence the question. You guys have any good players on the last year of their deals. I know Champ would be one
IMO
Sayre, I have a question
I’m curious about Schefter’s comment that a team that picks up Moss would receive a compensatory picks.
I thought compensatory picks were awarded to teams that lost a player(s) in free agency.
Would Moss want to come here if he believed that there was a strong possibility that he would be let go into free agency at the end of the year?
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
It's not only losing players
it’s also dependent upon what your players who leave sign for elsewhere. He has been planning on testing free agency since before the year.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:27 PM MDT up reply actions
Thanks, I was just basically confused.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
Compensatory picks procedures
In addition to the 32 picks in each round, there are a total of 32 picks awarded at the ends of Rounds 3 through 7. These picks, known as “compensatory picks,” are awarded to teams that have lost more qualifying free agents than they gained the previous year in free agency. Teams that gain and lose the same number of players but lose higher-valued players than they gain also can be awarded a pick, but only in the seventh round, after the other compensatory picks. Compensatory picks cannot be traded, and the placement of the picks is determined by a proprietary formula based on the player’s salary, playing time, and postseason honors with his new team, with salary being the primary factor. So, for example, a team that lost a linebacker who signed for $2.5 million per year in free agency might get a sixth-round compensatory pick, while a team that lost a wide receiver who signed for $5 million per year might receive a fourth-round pick.
If fewer than 32 such picks are awarded, the remaining picks are awarded in the order in which teams would pick in a hypothetical eighth round of the draft (These are known as “supplemental compensatory selections”).
Compensatory picks are awarded each year at the NFL annual meeting which is held at the end of March; typically, about three or four weeks before the draft.
"I don't need love, I just need wins." -Kyle Orton, 2010
Can't remember who we added but
we had, I believe, three comp picks a few years ago…it’s been some time now!
by Omniscient Orange on Nov 2, 2010 3:28 PM MDT reply actions
We got 2 compesatory 3rd rounders in 2005
Our 3rd rounder that year (90 overall) was forfeited due to salary cap violations.
We were awarded 2 comensatories (97 & 101 overall)
97 was used for Dominique Foxworth
101 was wasted on Maurice Clarett (Kyle Orton was taken 5 picks AFTER Clarett BTW)
In 2006 we got one compensatory (130 overall) and selected Dominik Hixon.
Thats all, folks
"I don't need love, I just need wins." -Kyle Orton, 2010
That's right...thank you
Now I remember why I don’t remember…I could give or take Dominique as he’s a smart player with avg, (maybe a lil above avg skills on good day) but isn’t makin’ a diff on a defense and isn’t going to kill you (the defense that is)either…Clarett……………………………………………………………….uh oh ya whatever!!! Actually bummed to know his life (most importantly) didn’t live up to his potential…I’ve seen that too many times as a coach…I’m still peeved about letting Hixon go even though I rememebr that Shanahan was making roster moves (salary?practicesquad?) and intended to re-sign him immediately…but another one that got away and of course we had return problems after not even getting to see him pan out for us!!
"A waterfall begins as one drop of water."
~Peekay
"When you face adversity in life look to nature for the answer...the answers are everywhere you look!"
~Doc to Peekay
The true measure of a man is not how he sits in times of comfort but rather how he stands in times of controversy!
~MLK Jr.
by Omniscient Orange on Nov 3, 2010 8:56 AM MDT up reply actions
Merriman would be a big help for a struggling pass rush
But all your reasons were pretty much just writing off the argument, you never gave a real reason. We really don’t need him. I’d take two good lineman over Moss any day because they will help our team more then another receiver. I’m a huge Moss fan, he’s going to the Hall someday, but he won’t help this team win. We score through the air with the best of them, literially we do. Orton is tied for sixth in the NFL with 12 touchdown, we are scoring through the air, we need to be able to score on the ground, something we aren’t doing. So your logic with saying we aren’t scoring touchdowns is wrong, we are scoring through the air, the same or better then as other aerial teams like NE, Houston, Cincy, Dallas, Green Bay, and Chicago, we are scoring through the air.
Merriman yes, he helps fixes a problem, Moss no, he just makes us slightly better at our only strength.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
We don't score TD when it matters,
and you know that just as well as I do.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:38 PM MDT up reply actions
True....but
at what expense with 8 games left..and do we get the HOF Moss or the one that gets frustrated and runs Marshall like routes when “not feelin’ it”!!!
"A waterfall begins as one drop of water."
~Peekay
"When you face adversity in life look to nature for the answer...the answers are everywhere you look!"
~Doc to Peekay
The true measure of a man is not how he sits in times of comfort but rather how he stands in times of controversy!
~MLK Jr.
by Omniscient Orange on Nov 2, 2010 3:40 PM MDT up reply actions
TD's are TD's
The score is established in the 1st quarter as much in the 4th quarter. A TD at the beginning isn’t worth more then one at the end. I don’t know that as well as you do apparently. I’ve seen games won in all four quarters, not just in the 1st or 4th. Plus, adding Moss doesn’t changing the game plan, which is partly to blame for our lack of scoring early.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
"TD's are TD's"????
You gotta be kidding me… No they are NOT. A TD when you are down 38-0 is not the same as a TD when you are down 16-24 on a final drive. come on, man.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:44 PM MDT up reply actions
Not coming around
A TD is 7 points, you win by scoring TD’s and lose by not scoring TD’s. We are passing for enough TD’s to win games, we aren’t running for enough TDs to win games and we aren’t stopping our opponents from scoring TDs. Moss won’t score more TD’s for use because we already throw down the field a lot, we won’t go deep more just because of Moss. To have a successful passing attack, you need a variety of receivers, which we already have. The best passing attacks of all time were balanced, not full of deep threat guys.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
1.5 per game is enough?
That’s about 10 points. Obviously, we’re not even close to committed to running the ball. Orton should have at least 15-18 TD’s the amount that we throw the ball and have been in the red zone.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 4:03 PM MDT up reply actions
We are scoring as much through the air as winning teams
Want to know the difference? They can run the ball and actually have a defense. I realize we should have more, but points are points because points win games, we have as many aerial points as the Patriots, Dallas, Houston, Cincy, Green Bay and Chicago. We could always use more, but teams we winning with the same number.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Luckily, there are some people who think this way
As it will undoubtedly help us get a good draft pick back for Orton later on.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:47 PM MDT up reply actions
It pains me because I hate him so, but I fully agree on Merriman. What do we have to lose at this point. We could really use the help at OLB as Jarvis Moss just isn’t that guy.
Why not on Moss as well.
We can cut Jarvis Moss and Rich Quinn or Gronk or any of the Ja-broni line scrubs like Clark, Daniels or LeKevin Smith
Josh McDaniels took an average team and made it one of the worst in the NFL. We are a team without heart, soul or brains. It is an unholy Trinity of loss. This squad is the opposite of the team McDaniels promised and that is exclusively the fault of the HC.
EXACTLY
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 3:45 PM MDT up reply actions
The risk vs reward is in our favor on both moves. I like where your head is at and the point on Moss and a compensatory pick is fantastic.
Josh McDaniels took an average team and made it one of the worst in the NFL. We are a team without heart, soul or brains. It is an unholy Trinity of loss. This squad is the opposite of the team McDaniels promised and that is exclusively the fault of the HC.
At this point
I would cut Quinn over Gronk. Gronk actually had a nice game on Sunday. He caught 3 passes for 29 yards.
Rich Quinn on the other hand is the biggest bust of the 2009 draft. What a tool. I’ll keep Gronk just on the fact that he is a decent fullback.
Follow me on Twitter: ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
"I'm really not this fat. I'm looking at myself on the screen and that 14 looks huge. Jeez dude, do a sit up." -John "Guru" Bena
Me too. Rich Quinn is the O’s version of Jarvis Moss. I hope we don’t keep him for years like we’ve mistakenly done with Jarvis.
Josh McDaniels took an average team and made it one of the worst in the NFL. We are a team without heart, soul or brains. It is an unholy Trinity of loss. This squad is the opposite of the team McDaniels promised and that is exclusively the fault of the HC.
We prob couldn't even get what we got for Phonz with Quinn
and that’s just embarrassing.
Follow me on Twitter: ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
"I'm really not this fat. I'm looking at myself on the screen and that 14 looks huge. Jeez dude, do a sit up." -John "Guru" Bena
Does anyone have an official ruling on waivers?
This may be irrelevant 24 hours from now, but can a team put in two claims? I cannot find anything that says if you claim one guy you move to the bottom of the list. I though crappy teams had first pick no matter what, or at least that’s how the rule reads.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
I thought I had read it somewhere... but maybe thats just suring the offseason
Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.
by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Nov 2, 2010 3:53 PM MDT up reply actions
yes, they apparently treat every waiver claim as an isolated claim
and low man always wins, based on winning percentage… here is the order for this week:
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-nfl-waiver-order-heres-who-gets-dibs-on-randy-moss-first-2010-11
Great perils have this beauty, that they bring to light the fraternity of strangers.
by Jeremy Bolander on Nov 2, 2010 4:11 PM MDT up reply actions
Why are the 49ers ahead of us?
We have the same record and they beat us. Shouldn’t we be below them?
Follow me on Twitter: ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
"I'm really not this fat. I'm looking at myself on the screen and that 14 looks huge. Jeez dude, do a sit up." -John "Guru" Bena
49ers have an easier schedule
http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/21479/2010-strength-of-schedule
So shouldn’t we be ahead?
Follow me on Twitter: ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
"I'm really not this fat. I'm looking at myself on the screen and that 14 looks huge. Jeez dude, do a sit up." -John "Guru" Bena
It would be strength of schedule in games already played this season.
I’m assuming the 49ers have an easier schedule because of the teams we have already played
Actually
SF opponents: Seattle, New Orleans, KC, ATL, Phili, Oak, Car, Den
Combined records: 30-29
Den opponents: Jacks, Seattle, Indy, Tenn, Balt, Jets, Oak, SF
Combined records: 34-26
So we have had the harder schedule. Shouldn’t that put us above them?
Follow me on Twitter: ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
"I'm really not this fat. I'm looking at myself on the screen and that 14 looks huge. Jeez dude, do a sit up." -John "Guru" Bena
Maybe it's overall schedule, or based on last season
Either way, you could email someone at NFL.com or ESPN because otherwise we won’t know.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
no, because the idea is that if we both have 2 wins, but they had an easier road to get to 2 wins then us, then they should be a weaker team.
I dont know if that will make any sense.
But if you remove head to head, and you look at the teams from a strictly number based situation. which is all this formatting is
We both have 2 wins. However it was more difficult for the Broncos to get to 2 wins (tougher opponents) so the Broncos must be a better team than the 49ers.
This doesnt have any real world application, but it is how they set it up when they made the rules
by DW76 on Nov 2, 2010 4:42 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
if San Fran gets Merriman over us I'm going to be pissed.
Follow me on Twitter: ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
"I'm really not this fat. I'm looking at myself on the screen and that 14 looks huge. Jeez dude, do a sit up." -John "Guru" Bena
They just picked up Thad Gibson
They are rumored to be a long shot.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 5:51 PM MDT up reply actions
And it looks like we are #5 on the list
So if we wanted him, there’s a chance we could get him.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
If McD thinks they can help, sign them both
I trust McD to make these kinds of decisions. I actually think I’ll be disappointed if we don’t put in a claim for Merriman though…we NEED ANY talent at OLB at this point.
Moss could very well be productive here.
"Bombs dropping down overhead. Underground. It's instilled to want to live." -EV
I hope we try for Merriman at this point. I think he can still be a stud.
Sometimes guys like him need something like this to refocus their lives. There’s no doubt the added fire and intensity for the 2 SD games would be pretty cool ;)
We need any semblance of a pass rush we can find, and this might just be a diamond in the rough if he truly regains his Pro Bowl form.
Regarding Moss…..You make valid points, but I would be very disappointed if we even think once about him.
Officially on record with a 10-6 prediction for 2010! (8/21/10)
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
John Adams
Hmm...
I’m not sure we need Moss because Brandon Lloyd is just as good IMO.
Merriman would be a nice pickup, though. Have him replace Jarvis Moss…
Funny
Heard you talk about this yesterday. And already its getting old
we never thought we’d blow our lead last year, so why can’t it happen this year?
Because we don’t have a lead :).
The Raiders aren’t a good passing team, but they are winning (dominating) right now, and Randy Moss also makes them better.
The Raiders already tried him. He didn’t make them better. He quit on them when he was there and he will quit on them again. Him going to the Raiders probably actually helps us more than him coming here.
We are not a running team, plain and simple. Despite the fact that Moreno runs hard, McDaniels refuses to stick to the run
Sorry Sayre, we aren’t a running team because we CAN’T run not because we don’t want to be. Why do you think we go 3 and out so much? Because we are determined to try and run the ball. If McD refuses to stick to it is is because we are behind and have no choice.
How about a motivated Randy Moss on a team that throws the ball 40-50 times a game?
Got released by a great team and didn’t show any improvement in motivation with the Vikings and in fact gave up on several plays. Moss knows he is extremely talented and fast but he tries when he wants to period. I disagree that he feels any differently. If he wanted a killer contract so bad why didn’t he shut his mouth and let his play do the talking for the Patriots this year?
Not giving up
McDaniels has dealt with him before, and succeeded
So signing a player who is known for giving up is not giving up? Also, I am pretty sure it was BB who dealt successfully with him not McD. McD worked with him yes, but I’m willing to bet the HC dealt with him.
I guess you can see my decision is no to Moss (unless we replace the other Moss with him).
As for Merriman I think your arguments are even weaker. We have no pass rush. He didn’t seem to help SD’s pass rush much. If he had he would not have been released. Finally healthy? Don’t think so. Motivated? Also doubt it. It shouldn’t take getting canned to be motivated to do your job good. I vote no on both but a bigger NO on Merriman.
“we are determined to try and run the ball”
HAHAHAHAHAHAH. Probably the least factual comment on the day.
As for Merriman, YOUR argument against him is very, very weak. He didn’t help SD’s pass rush because he hasn’t been healthy, not because he’s not talented. They tendered him at a 1st and 3rd round draft choice in SD, and the Chargers already boast one of the NFL’s best pass rush groups.
Finally healthy—YES. Are you kidding? The only reason he can be released is because he passed a physical.
Motivated? He just got waived from the team that drafted him, is 25 years old, and is a physical freak of nature.
You’d rather have Kevin Alexander? Give me a break.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 7:45 PM MDT up reply actions
I didn't say I'd rather have Kevin Alexander, I just said I didn't want Merriman.
And we are determined to run the ball. We go out every game and try to set up the run. Just because we fail miserably at it doesn’t mean we aren’t trying. The Broncos have scored 7 first quarter points. Have we been up more than 7 points a whole game except for Seattle? How long have we even kept a lead? We’ve been forced to abandon the run because it hasn’t been working and we’ve been playing a lot from behind. Just because we can’t doesn’t mean we aren’t trying to establish the run. Come on. Anybody who says we are not trying to establish a running game just because we want to pass first hasn’t been watching our games much.
by BroncoMath101 on Nov 2, 2010 8:44 PM MDT up reply actions
Nicely done, Sayre
I think you made a great case here for both players. I think that you do tend to jump on the big-free-agent-signing-bandwagon too quickly, but you’ve made some great points here and have changed my mind about both of these players. As a finance guy and huge fan of Warren Buffet, I also very much appreciate your point about “buy low, sell high” (or buy fear). The potential upside is significant considering that we ARE A PASSING TEAM (Moss), and WE DESPERATELY NEED HELP WITH OUR PASS RUSH (Merriman), whereas the marginal risk would be short-term and insignificant. I also feel strongly that our locker room CAN handle any negativity that Moss or Merriman might bring. Also, not only has McD already worked with Moss, but he has already worked with a diva WR IN DENVER (BMarsh) and gotten good results (100+ catches, etc).
"..on our shoulders and in our hearts." Wesley Woodyard
Thank you
And I like what you’ve added. I definitely think we can handle the personality. Marshall by all accounts liked McDaniels, and likewise the other way. McDaniels just saw that we could improve our team by again, SELLING HIGH, for a player who in my opinion is good but overrated and whose production can be easily replaced.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 7:48 PM MDT up reply actions
Sayre
Sayre, aren’t you the same guy who said the WR’s would be better without Marshall? And now you’re saying Moss would make the WR’s better?
So it's a positive factor in favor of this move.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 7:46 PM MDT up reply actions
Iffy on Moss
Hell yes on Merriman. He’s good friends with Jamal not that it matters.
NFL Sunday Ticket: $300
#88 Thomas Jersey: $120
Big Screen TV: $1200
Watching Your Broncos Lose Every Week: Devestating.
In the waiver system, not so much
As a prospective free agent, sure.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 7:46 PM MDT up reply actions
McD has worked with Moss before ...
He was the guy who allowed him to catch 23 TD passes … as for Merriman, beggars cannot be choosers. Our defense is terrible, instead of adding other teams cast offs who have never showed any signs of talent, I do not think any of these signings can hurt. Really think about it, what is the worst thing that can happen, we lose by 45 points been there … done that. Now is the time to think outside the box, or in other words, all options are on the table.
Great points
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 7:49 PM MDT up reply actions
my 2 cents
merryman i dont like him but we need the pass rush Moss no way we have 4 WR allready
okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider
We have 4 WR
One is producing great numbers, the others are average and don’t command the attention that Moss would. I love Eddie, but he’s oft-injured and Gaffney is better working the inside.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 7:50 PM MDT up reply actions
Moss
is a caner i have a idea sigh V Jackson of SD in the offseason went to college at N Colardo younger will play hard against SD he will want to come here if we make a fair offer
okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider
Good questions Sayre
I agree with your points 3 and 5 for Moss however I believe they are offset by the need to get DT more involved. Any balls intended for Moss are lost opportunities for DT.
Would love to see Merriman here though. Sure we always hated him but when healthy and motivated he’s the kind of guy that can energize a defense and this defense needs to be energized.
"as in football so in life"
To Denver fans:
I’m a visitor from Pats Pulpit just doing some spying of the rest of the league seeing who is interested in Moss.
I find it somewhat shocking how fans abroad can think “it won’t happen to us”. Randy Moss is like a man or a woman who has been married four times and you are now looking at that individual as a potential spouse! I find it particularly curious how desperate suitors can look at someone with stars in their eyes and say…. “it won’t happen to us”. It’s almost funny!
Look at it this way folks….. Ask yourselves this: Do the Broncos stand any reasonable chance of making a playoff run at this point? If your answer is NO! then why in God’s name would you want him?
I’m a die-hard Pats fan and Randy claims to be in a love affair with Belichick and the Pats. New England is probably the one place Randy could go to and be reasonbly happy and content. New England fans and the Pats franchise treated him quite well upon his return and he embraced us back. With that said, I have significant question how long he can keep that smile on his face after a few games of getting the ball thrown his way just a few times per game.
I should say “I don’t believe it”…… but I actually DO
by Bills friend on Nov 2, 2010 5:39 PM MDT reply actions 2 recs
Good to hear this from a pats fan who had Moss when he was a happy productive player and who still managed to cause enough waves to be let go.
Thanks for posting this.
by BroncoMath101 on Nov 2, 2010 6:50 PM MDT up reply actions
Thanks for coming on over...
I’m a Randy Moss fan, but I see exactly what you see. Picking up Moss would be ridiculous for the Broncos, it would just screw up the one thing we have chemistry with right now and that’s with our QB and WR’s. If I’m going to be honest, I would love to see him get picked up by the Patriots again. Get a 3rd rounder for free, get Moss back to make the defense sweat, and still have Branch, Tate, Welker, and Hernandez as the primary threats. Also it’s good to see Woodhead doing so well for you guys. He was one of the guys I was rooting for when I was watching Hard Knocks, but I’m much happier seeing him with you guys, seems almost Welker-like, but as a running back (I’m not just saying that because they’re both white guys either).
You can take the man out of Colorado, but you can't take Colorado out of the man.
by manbearpig5000000 on Nov 2, 2010 7:25 PM MDT up reply actions
thank u
bill friend
okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider
Thanks for the love!
The Broncs are the one team I hate to see struggling right now. It bums me out to see the Bronc fans weathering the bad bounces and occasional poor performances.
I’ll be thinking about you folks as the inevitable debate between Orton and Tebow heats up…. I’m glad we don’t have to deal with it! LOL
I’ve blogged on many sites and you guys lead the pack when it comes to passionately supporting your team…. and…. embrace conversation in which you exchange opposing views and (more importantly) do it with class. Good work guys!
Yes, to Merriroid. Denver really needs from 7 help and if Merriroid has anything left in the tank it can’t hurt. Plus, maybe he can give some insight to the upcoming Chargers games.
NO to Moss! Seriously?? The guy’s a cancer and a “me first” player. And we already have a guy better than Moss. His name’s Brandon Lloyd. Moss will only piss and moan when he doesn’t get as many passes as X that current week.
by Gristle McThornbody on Nov 2, 2010 5:51 PM MDT reply actions
I am against bringing in Moss but in no way shape or form do I think Brandon Lloyd is better.
Moss is possibly a future HOFer, Lloyd will not be. Moss is the best WR in the league when he plays hard. The problem is that he doesn’t always play hard and he plays for himself not the other guys on his team. Lloyd does play for the team and that is why I like him so much. If Lloyd had Moss’ talent while keeping his work ethic/selfless play then he would be better than Moss.
by BroncoMath101 on Nov 2, 2010 6:52 PM MDT up reply actions
Yeah, overall Moss has had a better career and probably will over Lloyd. No arguments there. But currently? I think Lloyd is a better overall receiver. You have to take everything into account: blocking, character, etc.
If Moss were brought in, then he would also take away reps from Thomas and Decker. Not that those two are getting reps anyway, but kiss them goodbye if Randy comes to town. Might as well deactivate them every week, too.
There is also a school of thought I’m hearing on the radio that if Denver loses to the Chefs this next game, then it’ll be time for Orton, Gaffney, Lloyd etc. to start giving their reps to the younger crew like Tebow, Thomas and Decker. More and more, I can’t see an argument against that if there’s 4-5 games left in the season and it’s all still in the crapper.
But seriously folks, I can’t believe we’re arguing about Randy Flippin’ Moss. WR is arguably one of the best spots on the team.
by Gristle McThornbody on Nov 2, 2010 8:36 PM MDT up reply actions
Agreed...
There was a time when Moss might’ve been the top receiver in the league, but it’s long gone. Now I’d put A. Johnson #1, and a slew of others close behind (Moss not being one of them). But yeah, right now…this year? Give me Lloyd all day.
You can have BOTH
;)
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 9:09 PM MDT up reply actions
Haha...I think I'll pass on Moss...
I do like the idea of picking up Merriman…..It’s rare I disagree with you Sayre (I was one of the first Tebow bandwagoneers) but I don’t think Moss does much for us. I don’t know the compensatory pick rules, so that is intriguing, though, so I might be open to a change of heart.
Moss - yes
Merriman – no (unless the NFL stops testing for roids)
"It's the first time that I've probably ever seen a 260 pound back run into a free safety and go flat on his back, I mean it was exciting." ~John Elway
That's a first
We have a bigger need for Merriman, but interesting.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 7:51 PM MDT up reply actions
Merriman would immediately become OUR best pass rusher?
I agree with Sayre! We should offer him immediately!
"Attitude reflects Leadership" Hogblog...aka KSM
No way to Moss
Too many clips of him jogging around on the field. The first prerequisite for any player is that they give their full effort. It should be a given that a player goes full speed whenever they’re on the field.
Merriman, I could take him or leave him. On paper he would seem to help an area of need. But he doesn’t seem to be at the level he used to be.
JUST SAY NO!!!
All I can do is just pour some tea for two
and speak my point of view, but it's not sane
Man I REALLY can't stand Merriman
but I say it’s definitely worth a look, what do we have to lose? Absolutely NO to Randy Moss though, he has no business being in our corps of wide receivers.
You can take the man out of Colorado, but you can't take Colorado out of the man.
by manbearpig5000000 on Nov 2, 2010 7:16 PM MDT reply actions
The best and only argument against Merriman..
Is that he won’t be there…..Bills, Cowboys,Panthers, 9ers are in front of us. Can’t imagine that 2 or 3 of those teams don’t claim him. I could be wrong but the likelihood that he gets that far down the list isn’t good at all.
"as in football so in life"
I completely agree
There’s no reason other than his lights out dance that people here don’t like him. He has pass rush potential, and he could very easily bust with his next team, but why not take the risk when you have absolutely nothing to lose?
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 7:52 PM MDT up reply actions
No reason to not take the risk if we get the chance.
I think he would be particularly motivated for at least 2 games this year! Not to mention his familiarity with the rest of the AFC West!
"as in football so in life"
And also, I severely doubt any of those teams picks him up
The only one would be Dallas, MAYBE Buffalo. The others…no. Dallas could take a look at him, but who knows?
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 7:53 PM MDT up reply actions
I hope you're right but...
Why wouldn’t the 9ers who tried to trade for him or the Panthers try to get him as well as the Cowboys who considered drafting him over Ware and the Bills who can’t pressure the QB be lining up for him?
"as in football so in life"
Well, the Bills like I said, might. The Cowboys might also. The 9ers just signed Thaddeus Gibson and by all accounts are happy with manny Lawson. Their beat writer discounted it.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 2, 2010 8:29 PM MDT up reply actions
I think Cowboys are perfectly fine without him.. They have Demarcus and a solid LB opposite him in Anthony Spencer..
I think the only team we’d have to worry about is the bills.. but i believe that if McD has his head screwed on right, he put his claim the nanosecond that Merriman became available.. We have consistently seen zero to minimal pressure from the edges.. its an absolute gift from AJ Smiths dumbass..
Jarvis Moss is in no single way better than Shawn Merriman.. he’s even a liability on Special teams.. just cut him loose already and see if Merriman is anywhere near the player he was a couple years back.. he cant be as bad as Jarvis
by Broncos808 on Nov 2, 2010 9:32 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
I take Merriman in a heart beat!
You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
I agree! I'd go after Merriman too.
IMHO I think we have a few more reasons to get Merriman: He played for Nunnley in San Diego, he knows the system, and he’ll two weeks to get up to speed. I’d love to see him plant Rivers. Wouldn’t you?
Go Broncos!
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy."
Martin Luther King Jr.
by sbsbroncofan on Nov 2, 2010 10:28 PM MDT up reply actions
I would take a chance on Merriman, possibly, but NEVER Randy Moss.
I hate the guy. He is a cancer in the locker room, and a genuinely crappy human being. RM is TO, without the production this season. If we could immediately trade him for a 2nd rounder? Maybe. (And I mean immediately, I don’t even want him in a broncos uniform.)
Merriman is a long way from his old dominant self, but he still has some quickness, and might be a worthwhile pick up for his pass rushing ability. We definitely need somebody to put pressure on the QB.
Hit the button too early...
I am aware there are no trades this season, but I didn’t put it in there… Either way I stay fast, if we could trade him, maybe, but since it’s not an option, I say no to Moss.
I'd be happy with Merriman, even though i really hated him while he played for the chargers.
But he’s a nasty player who would get the team excited with his fiery nature. Can’t have too many guys and can’t have too many guys who can pass rush. You CAN have too few of them. Our Defense has been good enough but awful on third down. Thus they have not been able to show anyone what they’re capable of. So, i would go get Merriman and if it doesn’t work out what’s everyone gonna do? Call the broncos the worst team in the league and criticize every decision the organization has ever made? …. haha
I think we already have the answer to our Offensive struggles sitting on our bench and playing special teams. 6’3" 215 lbs, rookie wideout eric decker. Purely for what he will do for us as a clutch reciever. We really miss stokely, until decker catches some passes, we’ll continue to stink on third downs. I really think that we need to put these guys out there to create match up problems. Brandon Lloyd has been putting up numbers, but no one really is afraid of him and they don’t care if he hangs up some good stats and gets me some nice fantasy numbers each week, he ain’t gonna beat you on the scoreboard at the end of the game. He doesn’t impact the running game. He draws single coverages. I have not seen Lloyd get doubled at all. That’s a case for getting RM too, cause he still does draw the double team. BMarsh did that as well. Decker knows how to use his body, and you can throw to him in coverage and he’ll still catch it. Don’t ask me to prove this i can’t, its just something i know in my gut. When you’re a defender and you cover a guy up and he still catches the ball, its frustrating, and you start to get uncomfortable. Anyway, what i’m trying to say is by letting our big rooks get out there, i think it’ll help the run game out just because bigger guys are more imposing to defenders and have to be watched. So…I think we actually need Merriman, even if he wouldn’t want to play for the broncos, he can go after the season but we need something now. On offense i think we’re fine, and guys just need to get more opportunities, and relax and focus on enjoying themselves. I haven’t seen anyone flying around on either side of the ball. Looks like everyone is playing really heavy. Like they’re just under a lot of stress. When Vaughn picked up that fumble against seattle was the last time i saw the whole team having fun. and lastly, still waiting on the play calling thing to make more sense. I just can’t figure it out. Apparently other DCs kinda have josh’s number this year, which really is the main reason i think we should just let DT and ED go out and smack some dbs around. That’s really what i thought we drafted them for. So i’ve been disappointed the most about that i think. 2-6 sucks, but i don’t think we’d be 2-6 if we got our bigs more involved in the offense.
Agreed.
I do think Merriman will be pretty happy with any team that claims him, and he is a guy with a lot of juice that might be able to get our defense fired up. It doesn’t matter as much about an individual player’s impact, if he makes the defense as a whole better. I think there is a decent chance of that happening with Merriman. Certainly can’t hurt any, right?
by CCBroncosFan on Nov 2, 2010 10:55 PM MDT up reply actions
latest from Adam Schefter:
Shawne Merriman — SF, Miami, Baltimore.
The Ravens are intersted?? What gives?!
It could be a smokescreen, I guess. But if Merriroid is good enough for the Ravens, he sure as heck is good enough for Denver. Wake up, McX!
by Gristle McThornbody on Nov 3, 2010 8:31 AM MDT reply actions
Rolling...
my eyes!!!! It must be Jarvis’ sudden surge of late……………………………………………….
"A waterfall begins as one drop of water."
~Peekay
"When you face adversity in life look to nature for the answer...the answers are everywhere you look!"
~Doc to Peekay
The true measure of a man is not how he sits in times of comfort but rather how he stands in times of controversy!
~MLK Jr.
by Omniscient Orange on Nov 3, 2010 8:57 AM MDT up reply actions
Those are just speculation
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 3, 2010 9:29 AM MDT up reply actions
True, but SCHEFTER speculation carries more weight than most other speculation. Just sayin'.
by Gristle McThornbody on Nov 3, 2010 9:39 AM MDT up reply actions
He was wrong! For once....
Buffalo is claiming Merriman. So we didn’t even have a shot. BUMMER
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Nov 3, 2010 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions
Haha
He’s good, lets get him! Crap we didn’t get him, whatever he SUCKS!

by 






































