Diagnosing the Problem: Time to Abort the Failed 3-4 Experiment
Most of us have lost what little faith we had left in the Denver Broncos coaching staff by today, especially after witnessing the woefully predictable play calling given to Tim Tebow last week. Unfortunately, we also learned that the two biggest problems with this team have little to do with the quarterback position.
The first problem is the exposing of the reality that Josh McDaniels' biggest failure was his selection of the coaching staff around him. I am not a big fan of throwing down the gauntlet like that, especially to other human beings whose livelihoods are at stake, but to deny it is to deny the truth. I personally wish them all the best, but I believe the Broncos organization would be better off completely replacing the entire coaching staff after the new head coach is hired in January.
The first problem will solve itself in January, so the other problem is this embarrassment the Broncos have tried to call a 3-4 defense. The only time it was sort of successful was when Mike Nolan ran it as a 5-2 hybrid. It's time to end this fiasco of an experiment and return to the 4-3 defense.
I think Wink Martindale tried his best to make the 3-4 defense work, but like Nolan before him and Bob Slowik before that, he failed. He failed even to hold teams to four touchdowns per game. There is just no way anyone can make excuses for that kind of performance. I like Wink, but he will have to find gainful employment someplace else next year - that's just how it goes in the NFL.
The good thing is, at least from what I have seen on the field starting in 2007, the personnel being deployed on defense are largely good players - good players in a bad scheme with bad coaching. In fact, the personnel I see on the field would likely fit better as a 4-3 anyway. There are some holes to fill and looking ahead there isn't much to look at to fill those holes. The biggest of which is the middle linebacker position, aka the Mike. The closest we have to a true Mike is Joe Mays and though I love his fire and tenacity, he lacks the physical ability to be the elite "Al Wilson" type Mike this team requires at the position. It's no coincidence that this defensive unit has never recovered from Al Wilson's career ending injury late during the 2006 regular season.
Back to the point, many of you are already rolling your eyes and disagreeing with me about the Broncos already having the personnel to bring respectability back to the defensive side of the ball. So let's take a look at this nifty chart I assembled that shows all of the defensive guys I would prefer the Broncos keep going into the next season. The chart is broken down by position and where I'd rank each player (Starter or Backup/ST). For a position of major need, I included the draft/FA instead of an actual player.
| 2011 Potential 4-3 Defense | ||
| Pos. | Starter | Backups/ST |
| LDE | Robert Ayers | Jason Hunter |
| LDT | Jamal Williams | Marcus Thomas |
| RDT | Draft/FA | Justin Bannan/Kevin Vickerson |
| RDE | Elvis Dumervil | Draft/FA |
| LOLB | D.J. Williams | Draft/FA |
| MLB | Draft/FA | Joe Mays |
| ROLB | Wesley Woodyard | Mario Haggan |
| LCB | Champ Bailey (Draft/FA) | Perrish Cox |
| RCB | Andre Goodman | Syd'Quan Thompson/Cassius Vaughn |
| SS | Draft/FA | Renaldo Hill/David Bruton |
| FS | Darcel McBath | Draft/FA |
You would think, from looking at this chart, that I want to keep everyone on this list. This is not the case. As you can see, I have "Draft/FA" mark on three starting positions. If the Broncos were to fill the DT or SS positions adequately, then I could foresee the team saying goodbye to one of the two backup positions. It would be great to have Brian Dawkins back, but I'm just not seeing him coming back for another year.
Naturally, I am not claiming this new defense would suddenly be the Pittsburgh Steelers or anything, but it would be a step in the right direction. Right now, starting from rock bottom, the middle of the road would be just enough to make this team competitive again.
The position that is the cornerstone of any 4-3 is the middle linebacker position. Unfortunately, I am not very high on any of the 4-3 Mike's in this years draft, so we may have to unleash Joe Mays for 2011. He is feisty enough and has a big enough heart to give this unit some edge - edge its been woefully lacking. I just honestly believe that the Broncos next Super Bowl ticket hinges on finding the next dominate middle linebacker, hopefully they find him by 2012.
As each week passes, the only certainty is that the Broncos coaches and players appear lost out there. The Broncos have no speed or quickness at the linebacker positions and it shows. Switching to the 4-3 would close up some of those interior holes that the linebackers consistently get blocked away from and moving the slower rush linebackers back up to the defensive end position would free up the linebacker position for the smaller, quicker guys to cover route runners.
I am cautiously optimistic that this will happen, because with each passing blowout the certainty of mass firings becomes ever more assured. As I said earlier, I'm not a huge fan of wholesale firing, but in this case it is almost necessary for this team and franchise to start fresh in 2011. With Tim Tebow at the helm, an average defense and some good play calling skills, this team has a chance to completely reverse their fortunes next season.
Go Broncos!
136 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This coaching staff
Operates much like McD operated…McD said, “adjustments are overrated” and preparation was key. During the week, the gameplan consisted of heavy dosage of Moreno, but when KnoMo goes down, and Ball struggles, no adjustments are made in the gameplan and playcalling. Kind of makes you wonder if Tebow limps off for a series if they will run 3rd and 9 QB draws up the gut with Orton, lol. On the bright side, we have a QB with more passion, desire, and sheer will than all of our previous QBs combined(excluding the Mag 7 of course!) Let’s combine that with solid coaching and a few studs on the D side of the ball and Invesco may very well turn into a house of horrors for opposing teams.
by knoepke84 on Dec 20, 2010 10:46 PM MST via mobile reply actions
Depends on the new coach
In reality, our defense is such a mess, we’re going to need infusions of talent in the backfield, linebacking corps, and on the line no matter what defense we run. The key is a good, experience coordinator. 3-4 or 4-3 we need a steady plan and, more importantly, one that will last for several seasons.
One thing I will say, is that I think Jamal Williams is a failed experiment and was disappointed by some plays in which he, a veteran leader, was taking plays off. I’d actually prefer Bannan/Rookie as a starting tackle duo in the 4-3 than Williams/Rookie.
Which is why Ron Rivera would be a good candidate. He ran both and adjusted his system for players
by ShyandObese on Dec 21, 2010 12:38 AM MST up reply actions
I think Ron Rivera would be great.
He was one of teh first names that popped into my head when McD was fired.
-Harvey J. Neptune
Cutler is more than a tool...hes a frickin HOME DEPOT!
-Boydy
why is jamal williams a failed experiment?
he’s been occasionally disruptive, and we’ve seen flashes of his power (like in the last game when he was single-teamed and he just walked his blocker back into the QB). he’s not a pass rusher, and he’s not on the field that much. he’s fine if he’s not your bedrock NT in a 3-4. i think he’d be a good guy to have in the 4-3.
I didn't vote on your poll Tim
And it’s because I don’t know if it is better to have a 4/3or a 3/4. I’d like to know, however, so maybe in some of your future articles you could fill in some of the differences? I’d really love to understand this point in the defensive scheme. I know that many of the most sucessful teams employ a 4/3 DLine but I still don’t quite get why it’s better. Of course, I do understand that our DLine is horrible, but all I need to understand about that is the crappy score. If they score 24 or more against us we suck on defense. So I want to know the why. Thanks…
We conquered this territory with our bodies and souls, then we watered it with our tears.
Go Denver!
I don't need to fill you in...MHR-U most certainly covered this.
http://www.milehighreport.com/section/mhr-university
A wealth of knowledge exists here, mostly written by our resident coach, Steve – who is currently inactive with real life workloads.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
Here are a couple of good one's, but they are all worth the read.
http://www.milehighreport.com/2009/9/2/1010580/mhr-university-the-denver-broncos
http://www.milehighreport.com/2008/6/8/548131/mhr-university-the-show-bl
http://www.milehighreport.com/2008/3/2/3506/95671
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
It looks like we had already switched to the 3-4 before Steve started this series, but
if you read the last link about the “gaps” you might get a better idea of why having 4 guys on the line will help close some of those holes.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
Thanks Tim. Very much appreciated!
We conquered this territory with our bodies and souls, then we watered it with our tears.
Go Denver!
np! I said the same thing when Steve wrote. ;-)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
3-4 stays in place for Doom
No. Leave the 3-4 alone, but just let someone who knows how to utilize it, run it. Do you really want Dumervil who just signed that massive contract to go to a DE position where he did not do so well? Offense is fine. Defense needs a complete overhaul. Champ wants out, let him have his way. DJ Willliams is well, DJ Williams. B.Dawk is hurt every other week like B.Dawk. We need new bodies on defense. We’re a mess.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 10:57 PM MST reply actions
The problem is coaching...
Bring in Dom Capers or Wade Phillips to rebuild the 3-4. Although Wade runs a different varient, he knows how to build a system around the players.
DOm Capers is just a great DC and 3-4 expert…hell, I would be OK with Capers as HC.
FIRE JOE ELLIS!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
People keep saying this
Dumervil had a league-leading amount of sacks from 2006-2009 in the 4-3, not the 3-4. He played great in the 3-4, yes, but people make it sound like he was incapable in the 4-3. Complete myth.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Dec 21, 2010 9:59 AM MST up reply actions
Points given up per game
2010: 29.6
2009: 20.3
2008: 28.0
2007: 25.6
2006: 19.1
2005: 16.1
2004: 19.0
2003: 18.8
2002: 21.5
"Who says Tim Tebow can't throw the ball...? Whoever said that, they didn't know what they were talking about."
-Gus Johnson
Thank you.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
That 2009 blip was because we ran the 5-2 for half the season before shifting to a true 3-4...
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
29.6
how bad is that…
"Who says Tim Tebow can't throw the ball...? Whoever said that, they didn't know what they were talking about."
-Gus Johnson
by plainview88 on Dec 20, 2010 11:11 PM MST up reply actions
Catastrophic is the word you are looking for.
check that…Biblically Catastrophic
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
A legit 30 a game on average. I don’t remember an NFL defense this bad.
"Who says Tim Tebow can't throw the ball...? Whoever said that, they didn't know what they were talking about."
-Gus Johnson
by plainview88 on Dec 20, 2010 11:14 PM MST up reply actions
1960's Broncos..oh that was AFL
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
You should do
What the #’s are from the Seattle game when Al Wilson hurt his back or neck or whatever it was.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Dec 21, 2010 9:59 AM MST up reply actions
The point is moot
McDaniels did the same thing Shanahan has done. Bring in mediocre defensive players and expect different results. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting better results. Gut the defense (minus Doom) and make a true 3-4. You got the best OLB 3-4 in football, right? Honorable mention goes to Clay Matthews.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:02 PM MST reply actions
Not to be rude, but the real world isn't a Madden game man.
You can’t gut the defense and expect to get any better. Shanny DID that in 2008…whoops! Realistically, anything over 20% roster change on either side of the ball is a recipe for disaster.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
Not necessarily
I’d point to the Patriots at the moment. They had 12 draft picks in each of the last two drafts, and when you add in the UFA pickups, something like a third of the roster are rookies or second-year player.
When you look at defensive starters, you have fourth-year FS Brandon Meriweather, second-year SS Patrick Chung, rookie CB Devin McCourty, second-year CB Kyle Arrington. In the LB corps, you have third-year ILB Jerod Mayo and rookie ILB Brandon Spikes, rookie OLB Jermaine Cunningham and fifth-year OLB Rob Ninkovich (2nd year as a Pat). On the D-line, you’ve got 2004 draftee Vince Wilfork, alongside 2010 free agent pickup Gerard Warren and either second-year DE Ron Brace or rookie Brandon Deaderick.
One seventh-year vet starter.
One fourth-year starter.
One third-year starter.
Everyone else is a rookie, second-year player, or only been in the system for under 2 years after being a free-agent pickup.
In other words, it is possible to gut a defence and till have it be fairly successful within 2 years of the rebuild.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 21, 2010 1:25 AM MST up reply actions
+100 to Comedic.Sans
The 3-4 has been. until Shanahan, the best defense of Denver.
Give these guys to a REAL DC like Joel Collier, Wade Phillips, Mike Nolan (remember him?) and we may have a top 15 if not top 10 defense again.
A lot of the problems with this defense right now is Lack Of Discipline. That goes to the Coaching. Remember the start of last season? When the Broncos D was discipline they shut down other teams. When the tinkering began, the discipline was gone as was Nolan.
Make those miracles happen - Jon Keyworth
by IgorBStrange on Dec 21, 2010 2:25 AM MST up reply actions
I’ve been pondering whether we should switch back to the 4-3. To me, the only reason we have right now to stay in the 3-4 is Doom. Is that enough? I just don’t know. If the new coach decides to go back to the 4-3, I think we should try to move Doom for something like two second-round picks. Losing a pass-rusher of his quality would hurt, but he’s simply not a good fit for a 4-3.
We’re simply so pitiful on defense that all options have to be on the table, including this one.
by EddieRoyalwithCheese on Dec 20, 2010 11:05 PM MST reply actions
Doom isn't that big of a liability, he just needs to learn to recognize pass and run better.
He gets sacks in both schemes…right now we are in a 3-4 and our rush defense is WORSE than it was with Doom in a 4-3, so I am missing your reasoning for wanting to move him or stay in the 3-4.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
But yeah....lol
We’re simply so pitiful on defense that all options have to be on the table, including this one.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
OK, but a 260-lb DE is going to be a target for the other team's running game
LIne a 340-lb OT opposite him and run straight at him. In that scenario, Doom loses the advantage of quickness and leverage because the play becomes about mass and straight lines.
i think you lose LESS of dumervil in a 4-3 then you lose of ayers in a 3-4
dumervil can handle being a 4-3 DE. ayers is too slow-twitch and bulky to be effective as a 3-4 OLB.
The reason I advocate the switch is because 3 separate DC's and two HC staffs have not been able to make the 3-4 work....
We will begin our third HC staff and 4th DC…its a perfect time to go back to something less of a disaster.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
They have also
Drafted a combined total of like five defensive players in the last 7 years (maybe exagerrating a bit), but really I am suprised Tim, that after being so upset that Denver gave up on McDaniels that you are so quick to give up on the 3-4.
The fact is that McDaniels probably needs more seasoning to becaome a head coach again, and the defense certainly needs more talent, and you can’t just adjust the whole defense becuase of the one or two talented players that we may have on Defense.
8 of 19 over the last two years for defense i believe were drafted...but yeah, not enough top end talent.
2007-2010 not long enough? The 3-4 has been given far more time than McD was given…if McD was still failing after almost 4 full seasons – he would NOT have my support.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
There has never been a full
commitment to the 3-4 for those years, they have gone from 3-4, back to 4-3, 5-2,3-4,4-3.
And you know why, injuries?(maybe) but realistically it’s becasue there wasn’t enough talent on that side of the ball, and lack of full fledge commiment, the broncos have gone through DC like nobodys business.
If the broncos wuld have been playing the 3-4 consistantly for the last 3 years I might agree with you, but you know too Tim that that hasn’t been the case.
Gutting the defense
Is the current roster going to take us places? The secondary is antique and few of the front lineman are winning caliber. With the exception of Big Vick and Justin Bannan ( I’m not entirely sold on Marcus Thomas) the defense is to quote Mark Schlereth “garbage.” Mario Haggan, Joe Mays, Jamaal Williams, do you want these players on our defensive side of the ball going into 2011? Let’s be honest, the defense needs a complete overhaul.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:13 PM MST reply actions
Did you see my chart?
Who’s old in the secondary? :)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
I love charts
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
Marcus Thomas?
"Who says Tim Tebow can't throw the ball...? Whoever said that, they didn't know what they were talking about."
-Gus Johnson
by plainview88 on Dec 20, 2010 11:15 PM MST up reply actions
is horrible.
"Who says Tim Tebow can't throw the ball...? Whoever said that, they didn't know what they were talking about."
-Gus Johnson
by plainview88 on Dec 20, 2010 11:19 PM MST up reply actions
Uh
I want to see Joe Mays.
So does John Lynch.
NFL Sunday Ticket: $300
#88 Thomas Jersey: $120
Big Screen TV: $1200
Watching Your Broncos Lose Every Week: Devestating.
I have
And I’m excited about the young DB’s and safties we have (Perrish Cox excluded.) My concern is our LB’s and DL’s. We’re pretty thin.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:17 PM MST reply actions
Marcus Thomas has been one of the only shining lights this year on D. Not sure what games you are watching.
FIRE JOE ELLIS!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
I mean no disrespect to you, Tim. I love your reports and I think you do an excellent job. I’m just not sold on switching alignments because the current one isnt working. Shanahan was awarded Dan Reeves defense and won a few Super Bowls with it. His failed attempts at building a defense lost his job. Should we jump the gun and not go with the current scheme because “it’s not working?”
We need a DC who can game plan with the 3-4.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:22 PM MST reply actions
We're good...that fact is the defensive scheme is an utter failure.
it could be personnel or it could be coaching…or both.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
I vote for "both"
But it is an interesting question whether McD started messing with Nolan’s ideas last year. That D started out good, then went to hell in a handbasket.
actually...not...
Shanny added a number of pieces to the defense that finally won the Super Bowl…Keith Traylor, Neil Smith, Alfred Williams, Bill romonowski, darien gordon, maybe another one or two.
"They are who we thought they were!"
gcman on twitter
What are you smoking? ;)
Dan Reeves defense? Shanny brought in a whole bunch of defensive help to that team. Neil Smith, Alfred Williams, Romo, John Mobley, Micheal Dean Perry, Darrien Gordon, Maa Tanavasa, Ray crocket and allen aldridge were brought in under Wade, so not Reeve’s guys, So no, Shanny did not “inherit” Reeves defense. The 1998 super bowl champs were even more shanny guys then the 1997 starters I just listed.
This is what makes shanny’s later failures on defense so puzzling. He had in the past built some respectable defenses.
by Keyworthpunch on Dec 21, 2010 9:29 AM MST up reply actions
I see Joe Mays as
Being a Jeremiah Trotter type player who provides a heart and soul for a D…yes, he is a bit raw but the guy had made huge strides before going down. Mays is definitely a guy who can provide a consistent spark for a defense and his violent tackling can force turnovers…something we all know we need more of.
by knoepke84 on Dec 20, 2010 11:23 PM MST via mobile reply actions
stay in the 3-4
we just need to bring in a good defensive minded HC or a DC that knows how to run a 3-4 with success…leave the offense alone…GO Tebow and Go broncos
by Dustin Miszczak on Dec 20, 2010 11:24 PM MST reply actions
offense needs a TE, FB, second RB
but i do agree, defense is more important
"Who says Tim Tebow can't throw the ball...? Whoever said that, they didn't know what they were talking about."
-Gus Johnson
by plainview88 on Dec 20, 2010 11:26 PM MST up reply actions
we need a receiving TE cause we already have a good blocking one, but i agree on the FB and 2nd RB
by Dustin Miszczak on Dec 20, 2010 11:31 PM MST up reply actions
I would almost say we need a #1 RB and make Moreno the change of pace guy...
he is always hurt…doesn’t have the knack for the big long run…he also seems to slow down and go down easier as the game goes on rather than the other way around.
"They are who we thought they were!"
gcman on twitter
Burton
We’re throwing these young guys in the secondary into a crap storm. We cant stop the run so now these young guys who should be focusing on coverage have to come up and try to stop the run. It’s not fair to say the rookies or 2nd year players arent cutting the mustard because the guys up front are not getting it done.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:25 PM MST reply actions
I like your idea
Of Mays being a Al Wilson type role player. But, is he a Al Wilson type player? Al Wilson rarely missed a tackle. Mays plays like John Lynch. Lay the lumber in lue of missing the tackle.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:27 PM MST reply actions
I love Al Wilson but
He did miss his fair share of tackles, just as many MLB do, Al wasnt too keen on wrapping up as well but his hit were so explosive he was able to get away with it just as Mays will
by knoepke84 on Dec 20, 2010 11:33 PM MST via mobile up reply actions
Gruden
Could he coach Tebow? Tebow is clearly our saviour.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:30 PM MST reply actions
Agreed
What coach wouldnt? Other than McDaniels, lol. Would our record be better than 3-11 if Tebow started toward the last stretch? I would like to think it would.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:32 PM MST reply actions
You really think Wesley Woodyard can be our starting Will linebacker
I like the guy but he’s not a starting 4-3 LB. I look at our starting lineup and the one you’ve projected and they both look equally bad. We have only two starters who are better fits for the 4-3 and thats DJ and Ayers. Dooms is not an every down 4-3 end.
We don’t need to switch schemes again, we finally need to draft a DL. We’ve been filling it with stopgaps but like any position that only works for a short time. If we switched i’d support it but the results would probably be the same, crappy D. Majority of the players would have to learn an entirely new scheme, new positions, and we’ll need even more creative blitz packages, etc. Don’t forget most teams have gone to the 3-4 because its much easier to be creative in blitzing in this modern day passer friendly NFL. Do you think the players we have can rush the passer better in a 4-3.
You talk about our past success in a 4-3 but don’t forget the famous Orange Crush defense was a 3-4 defense and that the Broncos are one of the first teams to successfully use the 3-4.
And now for something completely different
Again, agreed.
We have some pieces in place to run the 3-4 instead of starting over. How about Brian Billick as a DC? The man knows defense.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:48 PM MST reply actions
I say no to any coaching candidate that has been out of football....
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
I concur, I’m just tossing ideas out there. What are your thoughts on Harbaugh?
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:54 PM MST up reply actions
I think we're in for a surprise...
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
Do you get as much enjoyment as I do seeing Shanahan having troubles in DC?
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 20, 2010 11:57 PM MST up reply actions
sadly yes
its nice not having another reason for the MSM to rip us on
by DBroncs1414 on Dec 20, 2010 11:58 PM MST up reply actions
It just proves that Bowlen was right to fire him.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
I feel sorry for McNabb
He had awful WRs and one TE to throw to all season with awful playcalling, and he gets thrown under the bus because his godawful OC also happens to be the HC’s son.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 21, 2010 1:37 AM MST up reply actions
I don't...
Rex did better in his first start than McNabb has done all year…with the same players. McNabb deserved to be benched just as much as Orton.
"They are who we thought they were!"
gcman on twitter
Throwing a pick to seal a loss?
Eh. That’s what McNabb was doing, too. And Grossman didn’t have Galloway on the field dropping 3rd down conversions or TDs like McNabb had. Bleh.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 21, 2010 3:53 PM MST up reply actions
McNabb's Own Fault
McNabb can cry “foul” until the cows float home, but the simple fact is that his poor game play earned him the Bench. Consider that Philadelphia is winning with the same core which McNabb consistently piloted to mediocrity. After years of evaluations, the Eagles determined that it was safe to trade McNabb to an in-division rival. Aside from the Redskins, only the Raiders showed any real interest. Yet, even the Raiders passed on the, relatively low, asking price.
With the Redskins, McNabb’s performance has been quite poor. His inability to connect on passes down-field have hampered the offense as a whole and allowed defenses to narrow their focus without penalty. McNabb’s strength was always his ability to scramble long enough for down-field plays to develop, or to then take advantage of loosening coverage underneath. Clearly, McNabb has lost the ability to move effectively and is being required to demonstrate his pocket skills. In 2010, those pocket skills have been shown to be inadequate against even average defenses.
If McNabb were a dedicated student of the game, he could probably compensate for his declining physical skills. Unfortunately, McNabb has never had a reputation as a cerebral passer, or a player willing to put in the hours of play-book and tape study required to master the game as a Brady, or Manning might. Terrel Owens certainly gave us our first public confirmation about McNabb’s level of commitment, but other players have since voiced similar sentiments, albeit in more conciliatory tones. Certainly, Andy Reid’s demonstrated desire, over the past few seasons, to find another passer, even with lesser physical ability, to replace McNabb was telling to observant nfl fans.
I will never advocate for Rex Grossman as a starting quarterback. However, it is clear that right now he gives the ‘Skins a better chance to win than McNabb’s unmotivated efforts. Based on his last performance, the move, perhaps, should have been made earlier.In any case, it’s fairly obvious that Shanahan will be looking for a new QB in the off-season. Don’t be surprised to find Kyle Orton in that mix, even though his footwork isn’t quite up to what Shanahan seems to prefer.
Ultimately, as a Broncos fan, I relish seeing the ’Skins struggle. After all, they were partly to blame for our loss in Super Bowl XXII : A Day which Will Live In Infamy…:)
by MoB.DeadMeat on Dec 24, 2010 9:01 AM MST up reply actions
i'm with you, tim.
i like the 4-3. it’s not as particular with personnel and switching back to 4-3 would get us out of the constant dogfight for those rare noseguards and 3-4 DEs. 3-4 is popular and it’s in it’s salad years but that doesn’t mean it’s a better defense. it mostly means that more coaches have been weaned on the 3-4 in the last decade or so.
great article, by the way. even if people don’t agree with your take it’s a nice break from mock drafts and tebow praise/derision. rec’d.
I'm not sugarcoating this.
Thanks!
Though I did sneak in a little Tebow praise…. lol
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
i like the 4-3. it’s not as particular with personnel and switching back to 4-3 would get us out of the constant dogfight for those rare noseguards and 3-4 DEs
I’d disagree. 3-4 NTs might be hard to find, but even the top ones are relatively cheap. Vince Wilfork re-signed with the Pats to top NT money, and that was a $40M contract.
By comparison, top-flight 4-3 D-linemen are top-money commodities.
4-3 DEs will set you back $90m, assuming Julius Peppers set the market for that upper tier. And a 4-3 DT of the Warren Sapp disruptive variety is apparently worth $100m, if Albert Haynesworth set the going rate.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 21, 2010 1:40 AM MST up reply actions
the personnel issue is a great point
the more popular the 34 gets, the harder it is to get personnel for it, esp the elusive franchise NT.
LOL almost threw up looking at that projected 4-3 D
Seriously, its gross. Do you honestly think Woodyard could start? Do you think Mays would play, especially considering he was so bad in Philly’s 4-3 they traded him for JJ Arrington? Dont get me started on Haggan, he’d have no shot of playing LB! Chalk up needing 2 starters there.
DT’s, Jamal wont play a 4-3. Too old and slow to do anything but take on blocks. Pretty much best case scenario for said position is to draft a stud and hope he can cover for whatever excuse for a DT will be playing next to him. There’s another 2 we gotta draft/sign
Its nice to say Doom will start at DE, but c’mon he’s 250 soaking wet and wouldn’t be able to do anything beyond rushing as a specialist, and therefore not making him worth his contract. Hunter may be a good 2 down guy, but he doesnt inspire that much hope for me. Ayers could thrive here, but we’d need another DE to pick up Doom’s slack.
Thats 5 positions we need new guys to start in the front 7 alone. I realize that number for sticking with the 3-4 isnt much better but you cannot seriously tell me we should be making a scheme change that will need 5 new starters in the front 7!
I would like to point out though that if we bring in a coach accustomed to the 4-3, I wouldnt be opposed to that, as its best for an HC to go with what he is most comfortable with.
Lemme put it this way: No matter what scheme we’re in, we need a lot of new players, so either way would be fine with me AS LONG AS WE STICK WITH IT. You say we’ve been running it since 07 but we havent been committed to it since last year. Shanny went back and forth on it so it sucked. McD refused to draft players for it so it continued to suck. Whatever D we chose, our team has to be committed to it, or it will fail not matter if its 4-3 or 3-4
We need backups man...Woodyard yes, borderline guy....we won't fix ALL of our problems in one year bro.
Mays, Haggan…backups.
Doom had 12 sacks in a 4-3…
I’m not sure how we put studs at every position and every backup….is there an “edit attribute” command I am unaware of?
Yes, we need players….but every player we currently have fits better in the 4-3 with the exception of Doom and Jamal. Here is the split for the two defenses:
2010: 29.6
2009: 20.3
2008: 28.0
2007: 25.6
2006: 19.1
2005: 16.1
2004: 19.0
2003: 18.8
2002: 21.5
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
I would say its 2 am on the east coast and just started ranting without stopping
if anything take my last paragraph, I feel I sum up my feelings on the matter best there. And can you enlighten me on hat the stats you presented mean, don’t follow them.
And on the stud thing I only said that once. What I meant by that is if we are going to see anything near improvement in Run D that guy has to be a freak (him being whatever DT we draft/sign) or it will probably only get worse.
Again, I’m gonna stick with my last paragrapj, and I think you’d agree with it as well
by DBroncs1414 on Dec 21, 2010 12:04 AM MST up reply actions
points per game. :)
I was tired too
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
Doom
I dunno, I feel like he would excel moving back to having his hand in the ground. Dwight Freeney/Robert Mathis are proof that you don’t need to be a big DE. And honestly, Doom is pretty damn built at 5’10". 250 is pretty thick for that height, I’d say. Most of his sacks as I recall came with his hand in the ground anyway [in the 5-2 or otherwise]. Him, Hunter, Ayers, and some FA pick up would make for a pretty beastly rotation I’d say.
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(
Dwight Freeney/Robert Mathis are proof that you don’t need to be a big DE.
Yes and no. That Colts D-line is abysmal at stopping the run, but because it has Manning and his swag of first-round WRs and TEs and RBs, it usually puts up points quickly enough that the opposition can’t choose to run, so the Colts run-D is moot.
When the opposition does choose to run against it, they can put up career numbers. The Jaguars still taunt the Colts about ‘375’ – the day the Jaguars ran for 375 yards on the Colts. I repeat – three-hundred-and-seventy-five yards of rushing in one game. That’s why undersized 4-3 D-linemen are a risk.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 21, 2010 1:44 AM MST up reply actions
True.
But, I’d feel better having Ayers on the other DE, cause he can stop the run real well. However, this would mean people would just run at Doom every chance they get, sure. But maybe we rotate in Hunter on more running downs, I dunno. Or go grab DaQuan Bowers in the draft perhaps [although if we go DL in the draft, I’d prefer Nick Fairley or Marcell Dareus]. Who knows? That’s the issue with this D. It has so many holes it’s hard to know where to begin/what to go grab.
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(
agree. we need A LOT of new players.
the thing i hate about the 3-4 is it relies so heavily on the nose guard. you have a great one of those and you can have a great defense. if you have anything less, you’ll have a lot less of a defense. it’s too hard to find one of those dudes with all the 3-4 teams scrambling for them. leastwise, that’s my take.
plus, if we go 4-3 we could get haynesworth for free… i think…
I'm not sugarcoating this.
Shanny throwing us a bone?
LOL! Plus, I think he’s gonna continue to make dough boy’s life a living hell for a little while longer
by DBroncs1414 on Dec 21, 2010 12:05 AM MST up reply actions
Maybe....
It would be Shanny’s way of making good and trying to come back this steak house!
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 21, 2010 12:07 AM MST up reply actions
oh.
i was kind of hoping shannamahan just wanted to cut the guy loose and we’d pick him up out of the gutter somewhere. no dice, huh.
I'm not sugarcoating this.
that would be better than christmas
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 21, 2010 12:08 AM MST up reply actions
yes...actually Alfred Williams was talking about this yesterday...if he had a choice...
he would revert to the 4-3 and pick up Haynesworth when the Redskins let him go. He was adamant about it…and as much as I think Haynesworth is a jackoff…you got to know that he is gonna play hard to polish his tarnished rep. And he WANTS to play in a 4-3.
"They are who we thought they were!"
gcman on twitter
I wish I lived locally...I miss out on a lot living out in CA.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
"...as much as I think Haynesworth is a jackoff…."
Considering most fans hate on Diva offensive players, it’s surprising to hear someone advocate signing a Diva defensive player. Albert Haynesworth is an over-rated talent with a penchant for self-promotion. His history is replete with examples of mediocre play and half-hearted effort. The fact that he is “un-coachable” has been confirmed throughout his career. Worse still is the corrosive effect he has within the locker room.
Quite simply. Albert Haynesworth is a cancer. He has never bought in to the concepts of “Team First” and “Big Team, Little Me”. I would not want his flawed, selfish personality. poor work ethic and inconsistent performance to stain the Broncos now, or any time in the future.
by MoB.DeadMeat on Dec 24, 2010 9:13 AM MST up reply actions
What do you say about the Colts' DE's?
Are they nothing more than “specialists”?
Bull. Dumervil can play either position. He’s not a LB. You say he can’t stop the run or set the edge or whatever, but how good is he at defending the pass?
You can pick your poison, bud, but the truth is, Dumervil is going to be sucking at one thing. We all know what he does well, and that’s rush the passer. Whether he does it in a four man front or a three man front is irrelevant.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Dec 21, 2010 10:03 AM MST up reply actions
What is our salary cap looking like?
I honestly doubt this would happen but if we brought in Haynesworth would it make going back to a 4-3 worth while? I question Haynesworth attitude, but, I did the same thing with Julius Peppers and he’s having a decent season in Chi-town.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 21, 2010 12:03 AM MST reply actions
right
so we wont know what the cap situation will be like till it comes back
by DBroncs1414 on Dec 21, 2010 12:09 AM MST up reply actions
Skins
are on the hook for his contract
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 21, 2010 12:10 AM MST up reply actions
Oh you were talking about Haynesworth strictly?
I thought it as just a general question. Yes, Skins ate most of his contract. But if we learned anything from this year its that Haynesworth cares about himelf more then his team. In a rebuilding mode like the one we are in, I think we should pass and focus on getting young players to develop
by DBroncs1414 on Dec 21, 2010 12:12 AM MST up reply actions
I concur
I think what we learned most is that Haynesworth will not work for a dictator. I agree with you 100%.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 21, 2010 12:15 AM MST up reply actions
You’re right, I’ll settle for a .500 season at this point.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Dec 21, 2010 12:21 AM MST reply actions
honestly
I would welcome the change to a 4-3. We still have most of the pieces. We’d need some depth at DE and DT, some LB help, and of course secondary help, but we seem more built for that…
give me a guy like Gregg Williams or Perry Fewell who can maximize their skills, and create pressure/turnovers, and I’ll be a happy man. I like the 3-4 when its effective, but when it’s not, it’s BAD. the 4-3 I like cause I like the style of the G-Men/Saints/Falcons D’s. Less bend/don’t break, more attack.
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(
Oh
and Doom is a more natural 4-3 pass rusher. He’s not a Blitzer [see: Matthews, Clay/Casey [both are]]. Ayers is the same way. He’s a beast against the run which I would like, and I think he’d rush better with his hand in the ground.
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(
Ron Rivera looks like the perfect HC he had success in 4-3 and 3-4
He adjusted his scheme according to his players and he would do the same for our D
I am not opposed to wholesale change on defense. This defense is terrible. Can they give up any more big plays than they already have? I am not sold on anybody except Dumervil on the front 7. Jamal Williams? Come on, he’s washed up. Bannan and Vickerson seem to be doing okay but why are they giving up so much yards of rushing plays? They are a part of this defense too.
I like what your saying about the linebackers (a huge problem spot in my mind for a 4-3) and the secondary (though who knows if Parrish Cox will be with the team, or any team, next year). I just think the defensive line has not been addressed properly. The Jarvis Moss draft along with Marcus Thomas and Tim Crowder plus the recent free agent signings have done little to nothing.
Younger and cheaper - Colorado Avalanche
Older and drunker - Me
LB's
The Giant’s and Eagles are pretty much proof that if you have good, active, disruptive DL, you don’t need a fantastic set of LB’s. Every D needs a Leader at LB probably cause it’s the middle. For the GMen that seems to be Michael Boley. Ernie Sims in Philly, and Jonathan Vilma in NO, etc. Aside from those guys, is there an LB on those teams whose anything above average/solid? Methinks not… But they all have great DL’s. So. That’s what I want.
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(
Agreed. I just want a killer D-line and a middle linebacker with great leadership skills and can make plays the few times the D-line can’t. That might be overly optimistc but why not at least try to achieve that?
Younger and cheaper - Colorado Avalanche
Older and drunker - Me
Exactly. All the great teams in this league have great Lines, and leadership, so yeah. We need an Al Wilson. Is Joe Mays that guy? Maybe. I like that he at least plays with attitude/fire. He may not have the physical tools/talent to cover and such in this league, but the man can sure stop the run [so perhaps he holds the MLB fort down till 2012 if we can find someone then]
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(
I like Mays
But more in a supporting role. He is a great run stopper but not a great starter I’m thinking. He would be a good stop-gap starter for next year though for sure.
Younger and cheaper - Colorado Avalanche
Older and drunker - Me
So basically I agree with your post :P
But, Marcus Thomas is one of our only DL’s I’d really like to keep, honestly. The dude is playing well this year when given the chance, mostly. Great, no, but solid. Move him back to DT in a 40 front and I think he could be a solid player. Especially if you put him next to Nick Fairley or Marcell Dareus or someone like that.
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(
To be honest
I am indifferent to Thomas. I don’t want him starting but a backup role might be okay. However, if he were cut or traded, I wouldn’t really care.
Bottom line, we need play makers on defense. Outside of Bailey, I don’t see many. (Dumervil is probably a play maker too. Just hoping his injury didn’t set him back too much).
Younger and cheaper - Colorado Avalanche
Older and drunker - Me
Its not the scheme – 4-3 failed and 3-4 failed.
Its not the coaches – 2 HCs and more more DCs than Al Davis has brain cells
Its not the players – Of the current starting defense how many were responsible for the disasters since 2006?
If its none of the above, then what is it? I don’t know and I sure am glad I’m not the one that’s going to have to sort it out.
Also, the point I’ll make in relation to the post is Bannan – he’s been the only DL that has looked half decent, I’d like to see him start again next year. As for the rest, Champ and DJ included, I can make a case for them all to stay and a case for them all to be cut. Look at the difference that Suh and McCoy have made to their respective teams, pick someone like that or one of the top CBs and the Broncos will be much improved.
P.S. I love any blog post that uses the phrase : “to deny it is to deny the truth” best way to start an argument ;)
Marcus Thomas says hello.
He’s playing the best football of his career this year. Honestly, the only guy we drafted on D in 06 that’s any good. He may not be more than a rotational guy, but I like him. He’s been pretty solid when given the chance. [Great no, not by any means. But I think putting him next to Nick Fairley or something would be a MEAN combination. Or rotating him in behind Barry Cofield and someone, if we can pick them up]
Vick is alright against the pass. He’s not been too stout against the run though, which is irritating to me, for a man of his stature.
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(
I dont think the failure is the choice to move to 3-4
I feel the failure lies in the following stats
2006 – Larry Coyer
2007 – Jim Bates
2008 – Bob Slowik
2009 – Mike Nolan
2010 – Wink Martindale
2011 – ????
How can any defense develop when there is a consistent change in coaching staff. A new coach/GM may well want a new defense coordinator potentially making it 6 DCs in the same number of years. Even if they had run a 4-3 throughout this period there are still different approaches to this scheme and would the Broncos really be in any better situation. Even if they were I would very much doubt they would have been a league leading defense.
Would the Steelers have the defense they have if LeBeau had left and there had been 5 defensive coordinators in successive years?
"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson
by SteveUK on Dec 21, 2010 2:00 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
That could very well be the problem....
but the hiring of Wink was supposed to be about keeping some continuity after Nolans departure right?
Either way…we have a problem, probably a mix of both coaching and scheme
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
I am sure Who( DC) or What( 3/4 or4/3 ) will suit us in 2011
What I do know is Wink must go . He has done an awful job. No in-game adjustments . No dialed-up blitz packages fool anybody. Why would anybody want him back? People say they like him, what was there to like? That he is a nice guy. Slowik I’m sure was a nice guy. He has been here 2 years as an assistant / coordinator and has done nothing.
The 3/4 is still by far the best scheme to run. You can be so much more creative with it. I think it would be a disaster to go back to the 4/3. We just need the right coach to teach it.
Bronco Champions are being forged as we speak.
I respect your opinion
but our defense has been a disaster since we switched to the 3-4
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
I guess what you have to look at ..aside from coaching, and personnel, if you debate about the differences...do you want an extra guy up front to help stop the run, or would you rather have 4 linebackers to choose from when deciding to blitz
The quarterback?
Bronco Champions are being forged as we speak.
by BroncoRick69 on Dec 21, 2010 8:11 AM MST up reply actions
I agree about the coaching staff
They are good coaches but as a group they’re not getting it done. This is one area we need a clean start.
I do not think it’s accurate to put the blame for the defense on the 3-4. The blame lies in game plans and execution. A good coaching staff uses the scheme that best fits the team. We did a decent job of that last year, not so good this year. I hope we bring in a staff that’s not married to one system but well versed in all and can use the one that best fits the team.
Good restraint in not mentioning Tebow until the last sentance of a defense post.
by admill on Dec 21, 2010 6:46 AM MST via mobile reply actions
hehe...I mentioned him in the first sentence too.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
Question
My question is: the writers and posters for MHR can pinpoint where the Broncos have gone wrong, where the dire needs are on the team, who should be the GM, coach, draft picks, and free agents that can come in and make an immediate impact. Why is it the Broncos who are supposed to be professionals and get paid so much money fail to do this so miserably? Anyone
We have opinions, they have opinions
It’s why we blog…..
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
my point
I guess my point is, If one of us were to assemble a team, I think the team would be much than the current one I believe
Forward to Yesterday!
No 4-3 for me.
We’d have an undersized line (except for Jamal) if we switch as you suggest. Granted, we’d need to draft more players under either scheme, but are your serious about both Doom and Ayers getting pressure on the QB from a down position near the O-Tackle?
The Defense has changed coordinators every year since the price of gas was below a dollar a gallon. Why make things worse by changing coordinators and the entire scheme this year as well? What’s the advantage? None that I could ferret out for certain, just a lot of hope for better things to come.
The transition to the 3-4 was/is rough going. Now you’re asking for a couple more years of rough transitioning in the other direction? A theme on these boards is how important stability is in the NFL. Your post is flying in the face of that. More chaos for the good of the team is what I decipher from your line of argument. Good luck with that, Broncos, if you head in the 4-3 direction.
First they ignore you.
They then laugh at you.
Then they fight you.
Then, you win.
--Gandhi
What this team needs more than anything is some level of...
consistency and continuity on the defensive side of the ball. Every year we blame the D-Coordinator and blow up the defense, and every year we see our defense struggle to understand their assignments in a new scheme, and we see our former D-Coordinators having success elsewhere.
Continuity, consistency and some youthful talent are what this team needs.
Gutting the D again and finding 6 new players to create a new 4-3? Screw that!
go for it...
How much more disastrous could our current disaster get? I’m thinking not much.
"They are who we thought they were!"
gcman on twitter
Good food for thought, Tim.
Now that McDaniels is gone I am not comfortable implying that everything he felt or believed was nonsense; he clearly has coaching acumen but it is abundantly clear that he was simply in over his head and needs more experience before he is ready to take on the demands of a head coaching position.
That said, I think the idea of switching back to a 4-3 is intriguing. There are key personnel differences between each setup and a distinct difference in coaching philosophy and we simply don’t have either in place here. This is really going to boil down to the man hired to coach this team in 2011 but it definitely is worth some thought. Thanks for shedding some light on this.
Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.
You can change the scheme all you want...
but until you get a DC who knows what the hell he is doing, it won’t work. Nolan showed last year that he was on the right track until his play calling got reigned in.
I’m okay with switching as long as we have a DC who is dedicated to it. I just think our best option now is bring in Wade Phillips to coach the 3-4 properly and get aggressive.
"Bombs dropping down overhead. Underground. It's instilled to want to live." -EV
I like Ron Rivera
I really hope he is the one hired. Defensive genius.
follow me on Twitter: @Sayre_Bedinger
Check me out on Facebook also
XBox LIVE gamer tag as suggested by XBox: SoppiestKibbles
yep....that's for real
by Sayre Bedinger on Dec 21, 2010 10:11 AM MST up reply actions
I'd be very happy with Rivera
"Bombs dropping down overhead. Underground. It's instilled to want to live." -EV
Keep in mind that whatever "dream" coach you think of will not likely be coming to Denver.
Denver is NOT a dream job….good coaches that have a choice of where to go will NOT be interested in our coaching jobs. That’s just plain reality right now as much as it pains for me to say it.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
It is as good a place as there is out there
And the two names I’m mainly talking about aren’t the kind that will have tons of options. Wade and Gary won’t have people banging down their doors to coach.
"Bombs dropping down overhead. Underground. It's instilled to want to live." -EV
Wade and Gary as Coordinators....perfect.
We need a good organizer at the HC position….probably some unknown guy with tons of professional respect and little MSM notoriety.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
Think More Long Term
Switching back to a 4-3 just seems like you are grasping at straws to make the D better in the short term. Frankly, with the talent we it doesn’t matter what defense you run, it is going to be marginal at best.
What is the best long term defense for Denver? Our only player on D that is worth keeping for the next 5 years is Dumerville. There are some DBs with potential and Ayres looks solid but other than Doom, none of our guys look like they have pro-bowl potential. So, what defense is best for Dumerville?
I think the 3-4 hides his weakness (run defense) best on 1st and 2nd down. On 3rd down/nickel downs, it doesn’t matter what our base D is. When the nickel package comes in, Doom will have his hand on the ground to rush.
The other advantage of the 3-4 is that it is more flexible—you can show different looks and blitz different guys. The top Defenses in the league now are 3-4s for the most part.
Finally, I don’t agree that we have the talent to run a 4-3. To be good in the 4-3, you need a very talented DL and/or a stud MLB. We don’t have either of these.
I’d like to see what Doom and Ayres could do as bookend OLBs for a full season.
There is a lot of good sense here
The 3 – 4 has been misused at best in the past 1.5 years. There has been little to no creativity with it and it makes our lack of talent a glaring weakness…you don’t have to have a team full of star players to run a successful 3 – 4 as you can cover up some of that with scheme.
"Bombs dropping down overhead. Underground. It's instilled to want to live." -EV
What I dont get...
…is how the Broncos can train at 5,280 feet above sea-level and not be a dominate 4th quarter team. I mean the USA Olympic training facility is in CO for a reason, b/c training at high altitude gives you a clear competitive advantage.
I think that the Broncos need to fired the training staff and/or bring in someone from the US Olympic facility that can train the Broncos how to use this clear advantage to their advantage.
by NYCBroncoFan on Dec 21, 2010 11:20 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
we should keep the 3-4
The problem with the defense is not the scheme. It is the lack of attention there has been given to bringing in enough talent there. Any safety is going to look slow with that pass rush. We need to pick a DC with a plan. Then we need to draft players that are going to fit into that defense. Pittsburgh and New England play different variations of the 3-4. I want to see us get more of a Pittsburgh style. In order to be a good defense you need to get pressure on the QB. We have a lot of depth guys but we need more people like Doom.
A 1-gap 3-4 might suit the personnel of Denver more (especially Dumervil)
The 2-gap is all about big gap-controlling bulky and/or long-armed D-linemen like Vince Wilfork and Richard Seymour. Having a 1-gap 3-4 gap-shooting scheme rather than the 2-gap 3-4 gap-controlling one would fit the smaller, more agile guys – Dumervil can shoot gaps, but at 6’1" he’s a bit short-armed to engage TEs and OTs to shed blocks and get to RBs.
You know who else ran a 1-gap D system? The currently unemployed Wade Phillips. He got good production out of otherwise undersized 3-4 D-linemen (303lb Jay Ratliff as a Nose Tackle, anyone?) and knows how to utilise his OLBs to allow them to stand out (Anthony Spencer, DeMarcus Ware).
Might be worth a fit, especially given how Denver doesn’t have traditionally-sized 3-4 players.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 21, 2010 7:29 PM MST up reply actions
Dumervil 6'1" ? Yeah maybe on roller blades.
The dudes listed at 5’10". That probably means closer to 5’9" in real life.
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(
Oh wait
You’re right, yeah. Short guy, but with the wingspan of a 6’1" guy. I knew he had odd proportions.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 22, 2010 5:07 PM MST up reply actions
Actually, Dumervil has unusually long arms for his size
He’s a physical freak, with a wingspan equivalent to that of a 6-4 player, which is a big factor in his pass-rushing ability as it helps him keep pass-blockers away from his body. I do like the idea of a one-gap 3-4, though, and would love to have Wade Phillips running it.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
Wade Phillips got great production out of DeMarcus Ware, who actually *is* 6'4"
So I could see that working. Having Phillips would also ease the strain on the roster – the undersized DTs aren’t a death-knell, and the 1-gap is easier to learn in that you don’t need intelligent guys to make great 2-gap reads on every single play. See gap, shoot gap.
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 22, 2010 5:09 PM MST up reply actions
What failed experiment, Tim?
The only experiment that’s failed is trying to rebuild the defense by drafting offensive players.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
Got me there!
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
We should keep the 3-4 defense
The problem is that we don’t have the personnel to run it correctly. The 3-4 all starts with having a dominating DT at nose guard that can stop up the inside running lanes. This frees up the linebackers so that they can blitz or drop back into coverage without worrying about having to stop the inside run game. Let’s face it, we don’t have good enough players defensively, and we definitely don’t have the right guys to utilize the 3-4 efficiently. We just need to bring in better personnel. And Dumervil is the best Jack OLB in the NFL, it would only make sense it keep him there.
The problem is that we don’t have the personnel to run it correctly. The 3-4 all starts with having a dominating DT at nose guard that can stop up the inside running lanes.
Not necessarily. A 2-gap gap-controlling 3-4 does; a 1-gap 3-4 like Wade Phillips uses doesn’t necessitate a dominating NT. Jay Ratliff in Dallas is only 303lbs, but he’s a stud in that system because he’s got a first quick-step to penetrate from the Nose.
I see it as either keeping more of a 2-gap system and bringing in personnel to use it (beginning with a 350lb D-lineman or three), or shifting over to more of a 1-gap Wade Phillips (or even a Dick LeBeau zone-blitz hybrid 1/2-gap) and seeing who of your current roster will stick.
As a side-note – Wade Phillips himself is unemployed. Wonder if he wants a DC job?
Token southern hemisphere guy - 14,688km from Foxboro. That's 9128 miles, for you heathens.
Contributing Writer at PatsPulpit
by Comedic.Sans on Dec 22, 2010 5:15 PM MST up reply actions
He said he would love to come back to coaching as a DC
Buffs: 5-7.
Ducks: 12-0!
Hawks: 7-5 >:(

by 








































