2010 Denver Broncos Mock Draft Part 19
For your pre-NFL Scouting Combine entertainment, I will provide you with my final Broncos mock draft before the biggest scouting spectacle NFL fans will observe. I really don't have a lot to say before we get started other than this mock will follow a similar style to that of the last one I made in that it will have multiple looks at our drafts, one that includes trades and one that does not.
I think both versions of these drafts present a certain emphasis, which are unique to each one. As you may be able to tell from my format, I am partialed to a mock draft with trades as I see a deal or multiple deals for the Broncos very likely, if not imminent.
There is no question this is a deep draft, and while the Broncos may not be looking to overhaul their roster through the draft, I think they will try to add at least two more picks to the fray in order to add depth to key positions.
More after the break...
Mock With No Trades
1. First Round, 10th overall: Rolando McClain, Inside Linebacker, Alabama (NFLDraftScout.com #12) -2 reach
6'4" 256
2. Second Round, 45th overall: Demaryius Thomas, Wide Receiver, Georgia Tech (NFLDraftScout.com #39) +6 reach
6'3" 225
3. Third Round, 80th overall: Cam Thomas, Defensive Lineman, North Carolina (NFLDraftScout.com #76) +4 reach
6'4" 331
4. Fourth Round, 116th overall (roughly): Arthur Jones, Defensive Lineman, Syracuse (NFLDraftScout.com #122) -6 reach
6'3" 295
5. Sixth Round, 187th overall (roughly): Devin Ross, Cornerback, Arizona (NFLDraftScout.com #188) -1 reach
5'10" 184
6. Seventh Round, 222nd overall (roughly): Erik Cook, Center, New Mexico (NFLDraftScout.com #259) -37 reach
6'6" 320
Mock Draft with Trades
**Tony Scheffler to Cincinnati Bengals for 3rd round pick (compensation pick for T.J. Houshmandzadeh, roughly 96th overall) and 6th round pick**
1. First round, 10th overall: Mike Iupati, Guard, Idaho (NFLDraftScout.com #15) -5 reach
6'5" 330
Pick Analysis: This was a very tough decision. We had to choose between a player we felt could start for a decade at middle linebacker and help stop the run or a guy who is going to be a mauler on our offensive line for the next ten years. When it came down to it, it was a pretty easy decision. Our offense was abysmal in short yardage situations, and a lot of that had to do with the poor play of our interior offensive line.
We feel Mike addressed a specific need up front at left guard, where he will compete for a starting position with veteran Russ Hochstein in his rookie season. Mike is still learning the nuances of the game, but his athletic skills, strength, and mean streak are something you love to see in an offensive lineman.
Mike is the perfect fit for this power offensive system, and we think his production as a first year player will exceed expectations. He will pair with Ryan Clady on the left side of our line to form one of the top young G/T duos in the NFL, and his arrival allows second year player Seth Olsen to transition to center.
We also feel that Mike gives us a ton of options up front with his versatility. If Ryan Harris' injury does not progress, Mike can step in at right tackle to begin his career, while Olsen and Hochstein can man the left guard and center positions respectively.
Mike is a great personality. He is a joy to be around, and he has a great sense of humor. The fans will respond well to him.

via Jodatoa Blog
2. Second Round, 45th overall: Demaryius Thomas, Wide Receiver, Georgia Tech
6'3" 229
Pick Analysis: We had an objective coming into this offseason at the wide receiver position. Our first priority was to re-sign Brandon Marshall to a long term contract, and that was completed in the first weeks of free agency. Marshall will be a Bronco for at least the next five years as long as he has no trouble with the law. We are all happy campers in that regard.
It's also no question that third year player Eddie Royal was under utilized severely in his second season. He was targeted only 77 times, which is unacceptable for a player of his caliber. Our second objective was to ensure Eddie that he would receive a good amount of looks in the receiving game.
We feel he can be best utilized as a slot receiver in our three wide sets. Royal's quickness, route running skills, and ability to beat his man off the line of scrimmage are best used inside. We realize that Jabar and Brandon (Stokley) won't be around forever, and we feel Kenny is going to play a similar role to what Jabar does for us right now.
It seems like the only thing we're missing at this position is a deep threat to compliment the smashmouth style of Brandon Marshall, and Thomas fits the bill. He is a first round talent who fell to us here in the second because of a broken foot, and we are excited to have him.
Despite playing in an option offense at Georgia Tech, Demaryius put up All-American numbers, and he has the ideal size to speed ratio you look for in a receiver. He is an extremely underrated prospect who has huge upside, and we think he can be an early contributor in this offense with his big play ability.

via ESPN
3. Third Round, 80th overall: Amari Spievey, Cornerback, Iowa (NFLDraftScout.com #93) -13 reach
6'0" 190
Pick Analysis: We're really excited about adding Amari to our cornerback mix, which includes two very solid veterans in Champ Bailey and Andre' Goodman, but also a youg guy we love in Alphonso Smith. We think Smith's game translates to the type of game Goodman plays, and Amari is a guy whose physical tools remind us of a young Champ Bailey.
Amari was extremely productive for an Iowa team that boasted one of the nation's top defensive units over the last couple of years. He was widely considered to be the Champ Bailey of his league, virtually shutting down an entire half of the field at times.
He has some work to do with his hip movement, but we feel our coaching staff can fix any minor mechanical flaws in Amari's game, and we also think the veteran leadership around him is critical to his development.
The hope is that Amari can learn for a year while contributing any way he can on special teams as an immediate role. We feel he has that versatility having been a return man for the Hawkeyes and one of the team's best tacklers in the open field.
Overall, this was a very positive addition to our team. We feel he can be a star in this league with the right coaching.

via Gazetteonline.com
4. Third Round, 96th overall (from Cincinnati): Alex Carrington, Defensive End, Arkansas State (NFLDraftScout.com #99) -3 reach
6'5" 285
Pick Analysis: On this team, we place a high value on versatility. The defensive line is an area where we need our guys to be able to play multiple different positions. We think Alex is the quintessential 3-4 defensive lineman. He played and excelled in the 3-4 and 4-3 defenses in college, so his experience in different looks of defenses is not an issue.
Alex is a guy whose specialty is stopping the run, and he does it with his excellent ability to keep contain. We like that he plays with a low center of gravity, and he is quicker than any defensive end we currently have on the roster. His lack of ideal size is not an issue because he has the frame to grow, and he gets great leverage despite his 6'5" height.
His height is also an attractive asset in the passing game. His length allow him to knock down passes at the line of scrimmage, and his ability to get an effective bull rush make it all the more difficult for quarterbacks to see over the line.

via Outside the Pen
5. Fourth Round, 116th overall: Javier Arenas, Cornerback/Return Specialist, Alabama
5'9" 198
Pick Analysis: Quite honestly, we were stunned to see Javier available at this point in the draft, and we are thrilled to have him. As we've stated before, we place a high value on a player's versatility. We feel Javier can help us in a few different areas immediately, and we have a long term plan for him as well.
Initially, he will make an impact for us in the same area he made the biggest splash at Alabama, which is in the return game. Going into the draft, we didn't see a return man who had better field vision than Javier. He has great patience in terms of allowing his blocks to develop, he has a great awareness of where he is on the field and how close he is to the sideline, and his combination of strength and a low center of gravity allow him to earn the extra yardage upon contact.
In addition to his excellent return skills, Javier comes from a defense that is very similar to the one we employ, and he is a very polished nickel cornerback. What we are really impressed with is his ability to blitz on third down, which we believe will be invaluable as his career develops. He had five sacks as a senior, which is extremely impressive from a defensive back, let alone a cornerback.
We are excited to add this player, and he will be a fan favorite from the start.

via Bleacher Report/Getty Images
6. Sixth Round, 187th overall: Patrick Angerer, Inside Linebacker, Iowa (NFLDraftScout.com #199) -12 reach
6'1" 240
Pick Analysis: Though Iowa employs a 4-3 defensive scheme, we feel that Pat can eventually become a very solid starting inside linebacker in this league.
At this point in the draft, you are looking for guys that provide depth and special teams ability. Angerer does both things, and we couldn't think of a better player to bring aboard at this point in the draft.
In his time with the Hawkeyes, Angerer displayed his versatility as a linebacker. He was consistently around the play, making plays, recovering fumbles, tipping passes--you name it. The guy does everything. We know he has been labeled an overachiever in his college career, but he really has developed a nice natural instinct for where he has to be on the field at all times.
Patrick is very instinctive. He is rarely out of place, takes great angles, and plays with an unparalleled chip on his shoulder. He will contribute on punt and kick coverage right away, and we hope he can eventually contribute as an every down linebacker in our scheme.

via Sports Then and Now
7. Sixth Round, 200th overall (roughly, from Cincinnati): John Skelton, Quarterback, Fordham (NFLDraftScout.com #216) -16 reach
6'5" 245
Pick Analysis: When evaluating this quarterback class, there weren't many who possessed such intriguing measurables as John. By bringing in John, we feel that Tom Brandstater is ready to step in as this team's number two quarterback behind Kyle Orton, and we think he gives us a nice prospect to evaluate in the future.
John's footwork was some of the best we evaluated in this year's class. He has a good feel for the flow of the game, and while his competition level wasn't ideal, you look at his skill set and wonder why this kid wasn't playing for a big time college program.
He has a very lively arm, and while he tends to be more accurate in the short range, we feel his deep ball can be extremely effective with a few minor mechanical tweaks. Despite what his size may indicate, he has a good feel for pressure, and is able to avoid the pass rush by using his legs more often than not.

via Roar Lions Roar
8. Seventh Round: Erik Cook, Center, New Mexico (NFLDraftScout.com #259)
6'6" 320
Pick Analysis: Erik is a guy we really liked heading into the draft, and is one we see with legitimate starting potential in the NFL. He has played virtually every position on the offensive line, and was voted an offensive MVP two years in a row by his peers.
His leadership is something we really value, especially at this point in the draft. He is a very large body, and he has the mental capacity to take on our difficult offensive scheme and make adjustments before the snap.
Erik caps off a very busy but very productive draft day for us. We feel that we addressed every glaring need on this team with this draft as well as depth at certain positions.
Vikings/images/ryan_cook.jpg" />
via Vikings Underground
Draft Recap
1. Mike Iupati, G, Idaho
2. Demaryius Thomas, WR, Georgia Tech
3a. Amari Spievey, CB, Iowa
3b. Alex Carrington, DL, Arkansas State
4. Javier Arenas, CB/RS, Alabama
6a. Patrick Angerer, ILB, Iowa
6b. John Skelton, QB, Fordham
7. Erik Cook, C, New Mexico
56 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great mock draft
I suppose the only criticism I can make (ignoring my tunnel vision with regards to Pouncey) would be that if we are going to draft Iupati, at least trade back a few spots to get additional picks (whether 2010 or future picks). I see Iupati still being available in the late teens, so I think we could still get him a little later, assuming someone else is willing to trade up.
I would also be interested to know where in the depth chart you feel each of these guys fits, relative to our current roster.
Great work though. Rec’d
Thanks Tim
I like Pouncey just as much as the next guy, but I think Iupati probably will grade out as the better overall prospect at this point. Can’t say I’d pass on either guy though. As for Iupati being available, I just doin’t see it. I think the 49ers pounce on him at 13 if we don’t take him. There are other teams rumored to be interested in trading up for him too, or so I’ve read.
I would have done a depth chart, but I don’t have projected free agents anymore. I’ll start inserting depth charts again as free agency goes along.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 18, 2010 10:14 PM MST up reply actions
I personally think we should trade back to get Pouncey.
2 reasons. First, Pouncey could more easily slide over to guard then Iupati could go to center. Also, there is better depth at guard in this draft after Iupati, compared to the depth behind Pouncey.
Eddie Royal will have a breakout season in 2010. Count on it.
In my mock
I had us winnning the 10 spot, trading back two spots with Miami for the price of a 4th round pick basically, then trading back again with NYG for pretty much the price of our 4th for their 3rd. They have not given up much for the insurance they get their guy. Then we start thinking about how to get our guy(Pouncey). We make a package of picks to sell to NYJ at #29. They gave up a lot of picks for this draft so will be more than willing. Whala, Iupati and Pouncey.
"Just trying to win a MF game."
Can't say I've heard those rumours.
Where would SF put Iupati? RT or G?
Which teams are rumoured to be trading up for him?
I think they could use him either
I could see a team like GB trading up for him, Arizona maybe. Nothing concrete, just speculation based on need.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 19, 2010 9:46 AM MST up reply actions
Nice
Good work,Sayre.I too would like to move back for an extra pick and to get Pouncey.I think he can play guard or center.I just feel if we’re going to run the power game up the middle lets take the best available.
Although taking Iupati would not bum me out.
I think that's a good option as well
Like I said to Tim, it’s really a win-win situation if you can get either guy.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 18, 2010 10:14 PM MST up reply actions
Lots of options
Enjoy your drafts. Remind us of the options and variables.
I’d like to see you do a mock including some OTs as possible versatile players filling needs across the OL. McD likes versatility and we can use good backups and the OTs in this draft a far more plentiful and even superior to the OGs and OCs.
I wouldn’t take a WR until later. There are wonderful lookalikes for Demaryius Thomas then.
And would prefer DTs for the outside front. DEs IMO are OLB/DEs in the 3-4 (or 5-2 if you prefer). I’d take someone bigger than either Carrington or Jones early if there is value. Like the Cam Thomas pick.
Also like Angerer, Skelton and Ross where you have them.
by ivanthenotsobad on Feb 18, 2010 10:02 PM MST reply actions
Thanks for your comment ivan
1. to your OT point, I did include in my “analysis” of the picks that both Iupati and Cook have played tackle in their collegiate careers. Which OT’s do you see as options across the line? Seth Olsen played some tackle in college, so he could kick outside if need be. So can both guys I presented in this mock.
2. I think Thomas is a special talent, and we would be very fortunate to nab him in the second round. Steal, in fact. I agree though, this is a very deep crop of WR’s.
3. Carrington is listed as a DE because he so clearly fits the mold of a 5 tech in the 3-4. He’s not a hybrid. Neither is jones. In fact, Jones was reportedly checking in at much higher than his normal weight this season.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 18, 2010 10:18 PM MST up reply actions
Love all the Mocks but I just don't see it with Scheffler
I think most Denver fans have him waaay overrated. I don’t believe we could even sniff a 3rd rounder for him much less that as well as a 6th. I could be wrong though and I certainly agree with you that it is likely we will find out.
Unfortunately, McDaniels didn’t do his trade value any justice with the week 17 benching. We’ll have to see but at the end of the day IMO he has really done very little and has an injury history.
Thanks for your comment OC
You have to look at the big picture with Scheffler. First, compare the trades of recent tight ends and their production the year they were traded coupled with injury history. I think Scheffler compares favorably to Jeremy Shockey in terms of ability and attitude, though Shockey may be a bit more extreme. Shockey was traded, coming off of an injury, for a 2nd and 5th. Scheffler’s lowest RFA tender value is a 2nd round pick, and I don’t see the Broncos fixing a sign and trade with anyone for less than a third. It’s just not good business. It’s like selling an old trading card for half of what it’s worth in a Beckett book so the card dealer can make money and take it off your hands, even though it holds some kind of value.
And he has not done very little. He has led the NFL in YPC among TE’s the last four years.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 18, 2010 10:20 PM MST up reply actions
what do I spy with my little eye....
…something that begins with the letter IOWA… :) You do love your black and gold…
In the Scheffler trade, are you indicating that Cincinnatti would be trading a compensatory pick gained from losing FAs? If so, I should tell you that compensatory picks can not be traded.
Are you channeling Xanders or McD? I like the commentary, feels like I’m in a souped up delorian.
Have you thought about doing a mock where we select Derrick Morgan at 10/11? I don’t have my board done yet, but I’m curious about the kinds of targets you could set up if he comes off the board first. Maybe you already did one and I missed it… ;)
Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.
"That's MR.Styg..."
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 18, 2010 10:06 PM MST reply actions
Lol
Yes, I love the Hawkeyes. For once though, my bias is justified. Iowa has some very, VERY talented players in this draft. Remember last year how I was all about Shonn Greene at this point? Part of me wishes we had taken him in the second still… :)
Thanks for pointing that out about compensatory picks. I was unaware. Edit is pending, though it does make it more likely in my eyes that Cincy would trade a third for Scheffler if they had two picks in the round, which they will.
I tried out some commentary like I was McDaniels on this one. I thought it’d be fun!
I have discussed taking Morgan before, but I don’t know that I’ve actually acted upon it. I included him as an option on my rough big board, and I was questioned for it. I mentioned some of the good points you brought up of how he can play multiple positions, but I told the doubter to patiently wait for your scouting report of him, because your argument in favor of Morgan is far more convincing than mine could be.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 18, 2010 10:24 PM MST up reply actions
Yoo Hoo...Derrick Morgan...Yessss!
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
by BroncoSense72 on Feb 20, 2010 8:11 AM MST up reply actions
You Are
A Beast. Your Mock Drafts are amazing and you are by far my favorite writer. At this rate you are going to have 50 mock drafts before the actual draft. I like this one a lot. Only question is about Thomas. Any concerns with his broken foot? Also read some scouting reports that he has inconsistent hands and a little below average speed. Concerns?
Thank you, it's much appreciated!
If I can, I will do 50 mocks (that’s really my pace? wow…). I really don’t see it as a shot to credibility, more so a way to look at different prospects. Maybe for the mock draft challenge, I’ll just submit every mock I have so far and from now on :D
As for Thomas’ broken foot, it’s actually a relief for Broncos fans. It will heal in 4-6 weeks, but he will not be able to run a fast forty this offseason and thus his second round grade likely stays, and horrible as that sounds. Selfish? Maybe, but I want the guy to fall to us and that broken foot helps. The Broncos would likely check it out extensively before taking a flyer on him in round two though.
I question the report that he has inconsistent hands, though admittedly I have not seen a ton of film on him. It seems that if he is putting up 1,100 yards at GT, he is catching almost everything thrown his way because they rarely throw. He averaged about 25 yards per catch, and in the ACC I think you have to have pretty good speed to beat defenders downfield like that consistently.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 18, 2010 10:30 PM MST up reply actions
REC'D
I am in love with this mock draft. I love every single pick. There are a lot of things you and I agree on Sayre. Iupati/Clady could be unstoppable. Thomas is absolutely amazing and I want him BAD. Spievey is really good, I’d love to have him. We need at least 1 corner in this draft. If Arenas is there in the 4th, I’d be pissed if we didn’t take him, and we would have one of the most dangerous returners in the league. I doubt Angerer falls the far, but I would love to have him. Can’t forget Carrington, he’s going to be a STUD in the NFL. Overall GREAT mock, and if this happened, I would burst into tears of joy.
Eddie Royal will have a breakout season in 2010. Count on it.
Thanks stedtfeld!
Glad you like it! I’m pretty excited about this one as well, and I hope a lot of the picks stick for a while. Free agency could/will change things. So will the combine.
I think you and I have a pretty similar view of draft type things. I think if this came to fruition, I would burst into some kind of song.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 18, 2010 10:31 PM MST up reply actions
Angerer
We know he has been labeled an overachiever in his college career, but he really has developed a nice natural instinct for where he has to be on the field at all times
there’s a good point here. New England used a system that is very similar to Atlanta’s when judging prospects. Both systems – and Xanders comes from the Atlanta and McD from NE – use or used a combination of three things in evaluation: a system of lower case letters (12) and a system of upper care letters (of which some can be used multiple times to make a point) along with a numeric system of 1.00 to 9.99 – and no one gets a 9.99. However – there is a category, usually a 6.50, for the overachiever that you feel can come in an help as depth as well as developing into a potential starter. Angerer could be such a player.
The entire system is far too complex for a comment, but Chapter 9 of Patriot Reign, if you can get that, or Pete Williams’ The Draft (for the Atlanta system and approach) are must reads for understanding the kind of player evaluation that the Xanders/McDaniels team uses for Denver now. The level of comprehensive analysis, thorough foundations of exactly what the system is, what kind of player would be perfect, what kind of weaknesses can be overcome and which disqualify the candidates gives a good idea of why NE has been so successful in their drafts. Atlanta weakened last season, but they have also come a long way. Hopefully, Denver will go as far as NE has.
Don't say rebuild - say reload...
by Doc Bear on Feb 18, 2010 10:25 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
Great info Doc
I will look into those books. Seems like with a full year to scout players we as Bronco fans should prepare for a very well thought out draft. McDaniels/Xanders probably already have hundreds of options as blue prints. What guys fit, what guys they could mold to fit, etc. It will be an intriguing offseason to observe, to be sure.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 18, 2010 10:35 PM MST up reply actions
Hmmm...
I find it intriguing that you’re suddenly high on Demaryius Thomas (WR, Georgia Tech) now that he broke his foot… also, correct me if I’m wrong, but compensation picks can’t be traded (as I believe you indicated the Bengals doing for Scheffler) and I also have a hard time thinking that Tony is worth a third round pick at this point. All in all, interesting stuff. I really enjoyed your pick commentary and the development of your personal favorites, especially later in the draft. Keep up the good work!
MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!
Thomas
My interest in him isn’t really sudden. I’ve included him in previous mocks long ago, and I think the news that he broke his foot makes it more likely that we can get him, which encourages me. You are right about compensation picks, I should edit that right away. I’ll change it to Cincy’s 84th pick.
I wonder the reasoning behind why those think Tony isn’t worth a third? Maybe I can be convinced…
Thanks for your comments, and I’m looking forward to your mocks!
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 19, 2010 9:49 AM MST up reply actions
I actually think we might be able to get a late round 3or or 4th for him
…. but the skeptics will point to his bad blocking, big contract demands, and attitude issues.
My biggest concern is there aren’t that many teams that really need a pass-catcing TE and would be willing to pay his big money he wants. Cincy maybe, but they had a promising rookie this year before he got hurt… Buffalo? AZ? Tennessee? Unfortunately, many of the teams that don’t already have a top TE catching threat, are teams that are more concerned about TE’s having blocking skills… 2 TE teams, like Shanny’s system and others have folks like Cooley, Daniels, Carlson, etc. already in place…
The final reason is the perception that there is no way he’s staying in Denver, even if we can get him on a low tender contract, so opposing teams will just sit until we cut him.
We're on the same wave-length or something...
…At least when it comes to D. Thomas. When I read he injured his foot, my first thought was that this made him a very viable possibility for Denver’s #2. I actually like the idea of him (his upside) more than Bryant, but figured that the timing was probably off at the Broncos respective 1 and 2 draft positions. Now I’m all sorts of intrigued by the possibility, as he’d be a tremendous value pick in that slot— or at least probably would have been had he been able to work out.
I’d love either of these drafts, pretty much top to bottom.
I’m surprised you haven’t worked Bulaga into one yet (unless I missed it). He’s risen to 1a on my personal wish list, just behind Iupati. I love his coaching pedigree, his polish, and the fact that he’s still maturing physically (he’s probably going to get stronger). He combines potential immediate impact at guard, a fail safe if Harris can’t return to old form, tremendous upside, and the all important McX Factor: Versitity.
"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars."-- Oscar Wilde
by PredominantlyOrange on Feb 18, 2010 11:17 PM MST reply actions
Thanks PO
On Thomas…
I think we are on some sort of same wavelength…Maybe more people should find it too :D
On Bulaga…
Not that I haven’t projected other players to be reached for, or picks that have players predicted to go before we select, but Bulaga is currently rated 9th at NFLDS.com. When I think about it, Buffalo would be idiots not to draft him right? I think we might miss out on him by one pick, but I could still include him in a mock I suppose. As an Iowa fan, I would honestly welcome a draft like this:
1. Bulaga, OL
2. Spievey, CB
3. Edds, LB
4. Moeaki, TE
5. Angerer, LB
6. Dace Richardson, OL
I know that draft doesn’t address the DL, but hey, those are some talented guys coming in.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 19, 2010 9:54 AM MST up reply actions
OTs
My point is to look at OTs early in this draft because there are some gifted ones. Since versaility is what we’re looking for why not consider tackles adjusting to guard and center instead of guards and centers who might be able to fill at tackle. IMO the quality of player available then rises noticeably.
For instance, I’ve rated the top 11 players thus:
1 Hdamukong Suh
2 Eric Berry
3 Gerald McCoy
4 Russell Okung
5 Rolando McClain
6 Derrick Morgan
7 Joe Haden
8 Anthony Davis
9 Earl Thomas
10 Bryan Bulaga
11 Taylor Mays
If other teams pick any one of these players – Sam Bradford, Dez Bryant, C.J. Spiller, Jimmy Clausen – higher than 10-11, Bulaga, even Davis could fall to us. I think we take them without a backward glance. (However, if Haden falls, IMO we take him and look for OL help later.)
Just thinking in terms of best player available and then adapting.
I like Thomas also. Just think first round is better used with other players. Also I don’t have him rated until later in the second round. Actually, have LaBell ranked higher.
by ivanthenotsobad on Feb 18, 2010 11:19 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
Mays???
I haven’t seen anyone have him this high in some time. Is he a safety or a LB at this point?
MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!
Good question, ej
He dropped far down the boards on the basis of a very poor senior year. He was constantly looking to make the ‘big hit’ and neglected to prove that he had mastered his position and could be effective in coverage. LB might be a good choice for him.
Don't say rebuild - say reload...
Mays
4-3 he is a LB probably, 3-4 I’d say safety, but you could really go either way. He’s a lot like Thomas Davis.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 19, 2010 9:58 AM MST up reply actions
Woe to the team that plays Taylor Mays at Safety
They’ll be the easiest team to beat deep in the league.
Yes he has prodigious speed for his size and position. No he doesn’t not have the route recognition, ability to read a QBs eyes or take proper angles. All the speed and amazing athleticism in the world won’t make up for being late to diagnose a play in the NFL. Peyton and others would eat him alive. And this has been his problem since his freshman year and it has yet to improve, indicating that it will not.
Taylor Mays is a second round pick as a LB, regardless of scheme. And it’s not cause of a poor senior campaign, it’s because he never improved his weaknesses at safety. Taylor reminds me a lot of Ian Gold, also a college safety.
Of course, Al Davis is always lurking and could change where Taylor goes, but few still see him as a 1st rounder or Safety.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
I love the OT who can play guard theory...
It’s not necessarily my favourite option for our choice. But if you’re picking for value then you need to look at it.
Nice comment. Rec
"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes" Douglas Adams
by orange&blue_aussie on Feb 19, 2010 1:31 AM MST up reply actions
DTs
With regard to DTs, unless you have a monster NT (Cody??), the down three in a 3-4 (5-2) IMO have to be big, strong and as quick as possible. To make the 3-4 work the three have to stuff the fun and push the pocket into the face of the QB. They should occupy at least four, if not five, OL blockers. That allows the four LB/DEs to make the plays. Dumervil would get 25 sacks if the front three did this job better. Also, IMO our run problem this year partially resulted from the fact that the front three were not able to consistently push the pocket in order to allow the ILB’s to make plays. If ILBs are consistently fighting off guards and centers run defense will suffer.
Someone like Cam Thomas in round two and/ or Lamar Houston in round four I’d like to see with Fields, Baker, Marcus Thomas, even maybe Pedescleaux in some sort of rotation. That would greatly improve run defense and allow for increase opportunities for sacks.
by ivanthenotsobad on Feb 18, 2010 11:31 PM MST reply actions
Our DL
I think we have a few in house guys who can step in like THomas, Powell, Pedescleaux, Baker, et al. There are big bodies and if we continue to add to it, I wouldn’t mind it.
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 19, 2010 9:59 AM MST up reply actions
Oops
That’s “stuff the run”. Don’t know how they’d “stuff the fun”.
by ivanthenotsobad on Feb 18, 2010 11:35 PM MST reply actions
Sayre...
Good stuff bud.. Rec’d
Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!
Rec'd
If we get OL help of some sort early and Angerer everything else won’t matter to me. Go Hawks and Broncos!
"Just trying to win a MF game."
Too bad we didnt pick at the 199 spot
Skelton could be the “Tom Brady” pick.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
I like those guys too.
Not a fan of the other players?
by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 19, 2010 10:00 AM MST up reply actions
I would love to see the Arthur Jones, DT pick.
Despite his lack of “textbook” size, I think he’ll make an excellent 3-4 NT in the Jay Ratliff mold.
His understanding and use of leverage and his hands make up for his “lack” of size. He’s explosive off the ball which is a trait I value more than prodigious size at NT If you can get to the lineman across from you first with good leverage, you don’t need to be 370+lbs.
A combination of Ron Fields or Chris Baker on run downs and Arthur Jones on passing downs, I think, would keep everyone fresh and provide excellent production from the NT position. With Jones having the potential to eventually play all three downs.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
I think you should do an entire post on.......
…why a third for the Chef and a first and third for Bmarsh are reasonable claims. This should be a front page article since this issue shows up in the comments every time you make a mock.
I voted too many mocks in the recent poll, yet still get excited every time you make a new one. Between the Broncos season ending and the draft I usually can’t think about anything else. It’s a rather painful period without these mocks!
D. Thomas is risky
He’s an awfully risky pick in the first couple rounds. While he did put up AA-type numbers, it was on mostly go routes where the defense was selling out to stop the option and thus was in zero coverage.
He’s certainly talented, but nobody realistically knows if he can run the full tree.

by 


























