Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

Answers in Search of a Question: Denver's 2009 Draftees

"We learn more by looking for the answer to a question and not finding it than we do from learning the answer itself." -- Lloyd Alexander

"Okay football fans, here we go.  Welcome to the 2009 NFL Draft.  I guess you're ready to get going.  Thank you for taking the afternoon to be with us.  This is a great day for the NFL. . ."

    One of the first active threads I participated in here at MHR came on draft day.  My wife was gone for the weekend with her girl scout troop.  My daughters were both gone.  I was home alone, and thus spent waaaayyyy too much time glued to my keyboard following the ebb and flow of the draft selections.  It was an interesting experience, getting see how the many different members viewed each selection.  Hopes ran high, fell flat, and roller coasted all over the spectrum of emotions.  Some of our members were ecstatic about the picks, some were content, some disliked what occurred. 

    Now, because I'm not a particularly good draft prognosticator, I recently posted a look at some rookies who were named by Vic Carrucci of NFL.com as being most likely to have a positive impact on their team.  I used statistics compiled by Pro Football Focus as a means of launching the discussion.  This time around, I'd like to take a look at those college players that were drafted by the Broncos in the 2009 draft.  After the fold, we'll see what we ended up with.

Star-divide

    I would like to preface this look at our 2009 draft picks with a couple of caveats:  First, this list includes only those players whose names were called during one of the seven rounds of the NFL draft.  This is to say, I did not include the Free Agents who were brought in, nor did I choose to include the College Free Agents. 

    Second, prior to the natural inclination to compare one of the players we actually picked to one that you wish we had picked, I would encourage you to take a look at the number of snaps that the players in question actually played.  For example, I've seen comments about how some fans would have preferred Brian Orakpo over Robert Ayers.  They might be tempted to cite how Orakpo achieved a 10.0 rating versus the rush while Ayers' rating was only -1.6.  It might be helpful to realize that Orakpo was on the field for 922 snaps, while Ayers only played 426.  In other words, Orakpo had over twice as many plays with which to hone his skills.  This is a part of the equation that often gets overlooked: practice makes perfect, and opportunity plays a role in how high and how quickly a player's statistics can grow.  

    Third, and finally, I would like to point out some things about the data I used to compile these tables.  The information was drawn from Pro Football Focus (http://profootballfocus.com/home.php?tab=home).  This site provides some nice compilations of statistics, some ratings of those statistics, and most of the statistics are sortable.  The statistics can also be filtered.  PFF filters the the stats by the following criteria:

1)All -- every player at a given position who was on the field for at least 1 snap.
2)25% -- players at a given position who was on the field for at least 25% of his teams offensive or defensive snaps (depending on position.
3)50% -- players who were on the field for at least 50% of the snaps.
4)60% -- players who were on the field for at least 60% of the snaps.
5)75% -- players who were on the field for at least 75% of the snaps.

There is one glaring problem with this filtering template: players who were on the field for less than 25% of the teams snaps, can only be viewed in the context of all of the players at that position.  This can be an unfair comparison for some of the rookies in the league.  How fair is it to rank, say, a rookie safety who plays 5% of the snaps against a veteran safety who plays 85% of the team's snaps?  So, as you peruse these statistics, I would suggest that the first thing you want to look at are the number of snaps that the player was on the field.

    I would also like to point out that I am making absolutely no attempt to compare our draftees to any other individual player.  I am simply looking to see how they ranked in comparison to the rest of the players at their position as a whole.  If you want to compare a particular player, say Knowshon Moreno, to someone on another team, I would invite you to go to Pro Football Focus, research the other player and then share your observations in a fan post.  I am not trying to be rude or curt with that suggestion, quite the opposite really.  It is the point/counterpoint and fan participation that makes MHR a very rich site.

    Without further ado, let's take a look at our ten 2009 draftees (pictures courtesy of SBNation):


1)Knowshon Moreno

Drafted in the 1st round.  Received permission from the mother of the late Darrent Williams to wear #27 in honor of Williams, on the condition that Knowshon provide at least two hours per month of volunteer work at the Darrent Williams Teen Center.  He signed a 5-year contract.

 All (131)25% (63)50% (29)60% (21)75%
Snaps 611 17th 17th 14th 11th N/A
OA 0.7 46th 31st 14th 11th N/A
Pass -4.2 130th 62nd 28th 20th N/A
Run 4.5 15th 15th 12th 10th N/A
Block 1.9 14th 12th 8th 6th N/A
Penalty -1.5 126th 57th 25th 18th N/A
Attempts 247 10th 10th 10th 10th N/A
Yards 947 16th 16th 15th 13th N/A
Average 3.8 74th 38th 22nd 18th N/A
Yd after Con 603 16th 16th 15th 13th N/A
YAC/Att 2.4 80th 38th 21st 15th N/A
TD 7 16th 15th 11th 10th N/A
Missed Tkl 23 16th 16th 12th 10th N/A
Fumbles 1 74th 19th 5th 3rd N/A

We can first notice that Moreno was on the field for over 60% of Denver's offensive snaps.  As such, he is being compared to the top 20 rushers in 2009.  He was in the top 10 in rushing attempts and the top 15 in yards.  His average, however was in the bottom half of the league.  What leaps out of this data is the fact that 64% of his yards came after first contact.  This is a strong indication of issues with the offensive line; while working the Upon Further Review  team, there were many instances in which Moreno was hit first in the backfield.  From what I've been given to understand, yards after first contact are tough for a RB to acquire.  We can also take note of the fact that he was in the top 10 in touchdowns among rushers, and the top 10 in breaking, or forcing misses on tackles.

 

2)Robert AyersDrafted in the 1st round.  Signed a 5-year contract.

 All (68)25% (28)50%60%75%
Snaps 426 23rd 23rd N/A N/A N/A
OA 1.6 20th 15th N/A N/A N/A
Rush -1.6 55th 21st N/A N/A N/A
Cover 1.2 11th 9th N/A N/A N/A
Run 3.0 13th 13th N/A N/A N/A
Penalty -1.0 43rd 7th N/A N/A N/A
QB Sck 0 38th 27th N/A N/A N/A
QB Hit 5 17th 17th N/A N/A N/A
QB Pr 17 15th 15th N/A N/A N/A
Bat Pass 1 8th 7th N/A N/A N/A
Tkl 19 22nd 22nd N/A N/A N/A
Asst 0 41st 28th N/A N/A N/A
Missed Tkl 2 42nd 8th N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)            
Stops 12 25th 24th N/A N/A N/A
Thrwn At 9 18th 17th N/A N/A N/A
Recep 6 18th 16th N/A N/A N/A
% Caught 66.7 32nd 17th N/A N/A N/A
Yards 48 19th 17th N/A N/A N/A
Average 8.0 24th 18th N/A N/A N/A
TD 0 1st 1st N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)            
Int 0 5th 3rd N/A N/A N/A
Pass Def 0 5th 12th N/A N/A N/A

It should be noted that Ayers was on the field for less than 50% of Denver's defensive snaps.  It is interesting to note that he ranked in the top 10 in coverage.  He also had more QB pressures than I remember.  It is also helpful to remember that he amassed these stats in spite of being deactivated for the second San Diego game.  If I remember the facts of that game correctly, he was deactivated in favor of Jarvis Moss because Denver believed that San Diego's left tackle would be susceptible to Moss' style of speed rushing.  Unfortunately, Moss was not able to achieve the intended goal.  He was also among the top 10 in both coverage rating and batted passes.

 

3)Alphonso Smith
Drafted in the 2nd round after Denver traded their first round pick in 2010 to Seattle in order to move up to take Smith.  Signed a 4-year contract.

 All (198)25%50%60%75%
Snaps 150 129th N/A N/A N/A N/A
OA -3.1 132nd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rush 0.1 50th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Cover -3.8 165th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Run 0.6 60th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Penalty 0.0 1st N/A N/A N/A N/A
QB Sck 0 32nd N/A N/A N/A N/A
QB Hit 0 14th N/A N/A N/A N/A
QB Pr 1 30th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tkl 8 131st N/A N/A N/A N/A
Asst 0 122nd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Missed Tkl 6 150th N/A N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)            
Stops 4 117th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Thrwn At 19 120th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Recep 13 119th N/A N/A N/A N/A
% Caught 68.4 51st N/A N/A N/A N/A
Yards 186 113th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Average 14.3 36th N/A N/A N/A N/A
TD 1 63rd N/A N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)            
Int 0 94th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pass Def 2 97th N/A N/A N/A N/A

First, we should note that Smith was on the field for less than 25% of Denver's defensive snaps.  Without an explanation form the coaching staff, we do not know the reason for his limited play.  The second thing that should be taken into account, is that he is being ranked against all 198 CBs to be on the field in 2009 -- this means he is being compared to such players as Dawkins Hill and Bailey.  Thus it is very difficult to determine the true nature of Smith's capabilities.  When we compare Smith to other CBs with a similar number of snaps (there were 5 with snaps ranging from 147 to 161 -- Smith had 150).  Among that group, Smith was 4th in the overall rating, but 1st in the rushing rating, 4th in the coverage rating, but  2nd against the run.

 

4)Darcel McBath
Drafted in the 2nd round.  Signed a 4-year contract.

 All (118)25%50%60%75%
Snaps 127 112th N/A N/A N/A N/A
OA 2.6 16th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rush -0.1 102nd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Cover 2.7 19th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Run 0.0 81st N/A N/A N/A N/A
Penalty 0.0 1st N/A N/A N/A N/A
QB Sck 0 44th N/A N/A N/A N/A
QB Hit 0 65th N/A N/A N/A N/A
QB Pr 0 71st N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tkl 14 98th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Asst 0 118th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Missed Tkl 1 59th N/A N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)            
Stops 4 91st N/A N/A N/A N/A
Thrwn At 7 103rd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Recep 3 109th N/A N/A N/A N/A
% Caught 42.9 132nd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Yards 24 123rd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Average 8.0 127th N/A N/A N/A N/A
TD 0 1st N/A N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)            
Int 0 94th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pass Def 1 70th N/A N/A N/A N/A

As with Alphonso Smith, we must take note of the fact that McBath was on the field for less than 25% of Denver's defensive snaps, so he is being compared to all of the safeties in the league.  It is interesting to note that his overall rating and his coverage rating were both placed in the top 20 among safeties.  When we narrow the comparison to those safeties with a similar number of snaps, McBath was first in all rated categories.

 

5)Richard Quinn
Drafted in 2nd round. Signed 4-year contract.

 All (103)25%50%60%75%
Snaps 80 88th N/A N/A N/A N/A
OA 2.4 17th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pass -0.1 45th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pass Blk 0.6 31st N/A N/A N/A N/A
Run Blk 1.9 24th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Penalty 0.0 1st N/A N/A N/A N/A
Thrwn At 1 96th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rec 0 103rd N/A N/A N/A N/A
% Caught 0 103rd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Yards 0 103rd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Yd/Rec 0 103rd N/A N/A N/A N/A
YAC 0 99th N/A N/A N/A N/A
YAC/Rec 0 99th N/A N/A N/A N/A
TD 0 62nd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Int 0 49th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drops 0 1st N/A N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)            
Missed Tkl 0 55th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Fumbles 0 1st N/A N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)          

Saw very limited duty, but did relatively well when he was on the field.  Found it interesting that PFF keeps a stat line on the number of interceptions that were made by the opposing team when a receiver was thrown to.  When compared to TE's with a similar number of snaps (77-84, Quinn had 80), we find there were 3.  Quinn was rated 1st in overall rating and in run blocking; he was rated 2nd in passing and pass blocking.

 

6)David Bruton
Drafted in the 4th round.  Signed a 4-year contract.  Was regarded as a top prospect at his position in the 2009 draft.

 All (118)25%50%60%75%
Snaps 76 129th N/A N/A N/A N/A
OA 2.7 15th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Rush -0.1 102nd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Cover 1.9 25th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Run 0.9 48th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Penalty 0.0 1st N/A N/A N/A N/A
QB Sck 0 44th N/A N/A N/A N/A
QB Hit 0 65th N/A N/A N/A N/A
QB Pr 0 71st N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tkl 4 127th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Asst 1 96th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Missed Tkl 0 1st N/A N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)            
Stops 2 114th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Thrwn At 0 153rd N/A N/A N/A N/A
Recep 0 147th N/A N/A N/A N/A
% Caught 0.0 147th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Yards 0 147th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Average 0.0 147th N/A N/A N/A N/A
TD 0 1st N/A N/A N/A N/A
(fewest)            
Int 0 78th N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pass Def 1 70th N/A N/A N/A N/A

Bruton made the majority of his contributions on special teams -- see below.  He did place in the top 15 in overall rating.  There were 3 safeties with a similar number of snaps to Bruton (72-82, Bruton had 76).  Bruton was rated 1st in overall, coverage and run ratings, and 4th in rushing.

 

7)Seth Olsen
Drafted in the 4th round.  Signed a 4-year contract.  Listed as having been active for 3 games, but did not record any regular season, offensive unit stats.

 

8)Kenny McKinley
Drafted in the 5th round.  Placed on injured reserve on Dec 28. Did not record any regular season, offensive unit stats.

 

9)Tom Brandstater
Drafted in 6th round Denver.  Signed a 4-year contract.  Did not record any regular season, offensive unit stats.

 

10)Blake Schlueter
Drafted in 7th round.  Waived on Sept 1.  Signed by Seattle to their practice squad on Sept 7, released on Sep 15. Signed to Atlanta's practice squad on Nov 24.

 

A Word About Special Teams

    Some of our rookies did participate in special teams play, and in Kick off/Punt returns in particular.  These statistics include the following ratings and statistics:

Special Teams
G # of games played on special teams
OA PFF Overall Rating
KO PFF Kick Off Rating
P PFF Punt Rating
FG/EP PFF FG/ExPt Rating
Pen PFF Penalty Rating
Tkl # of Tackles made
Asst # of Assists made
MT # of Missed Tackles
 
  Kick Off and Punt Returns
G # of games played on Kick Offs and/or Punt Returns
OA PFF Overall Rating
K Ret PFF Kick Off Return Rating
P Ret PFF Punt Return Rating
KR # of Kick Off Returns
Yds # of Yards
FC # of Fair Catches
Ave Average of Kick Off Returns
TD Kick Offs Returned for a TD
PR # of Punt Returns
Yds # of Yards
FC # of Fair Catches
Ave Average of Punt Returns
TD Punts Returned for a TD

 

 

Special Teams and Returns

 

SpecialTeams930 PlayersRatings: -5.0 to 9.5 
  Bruton McBath Ayers Smith Quinn McKinney
G 8 8 3 3 2 N/A
OA 3.5 2.5 0 -3.5 -3.0 N/A
KO 2.0 2.5 0.5 -0.5 -1.0 N/A
P 2.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 N/A
FG/EP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/A
Pen -1.0 0.0 -1.0 -3.0 -2.0 N/A
Tkl 9 10.0 1 1 1 N/A
Asst 0 1 1 1 0 N/A
MT 1 0 0 1 1 N/A
 
  Returns 291 Players Ratings: -4.9 to 10.7    
  Bruton McBath Ayers Smith Quinn McKinney
G N/A N/A N/A 6 1 5
OA N/A N/A N/A -1.9 -0.1 0.5
K Ret N/A N/A N/A -0.4 -0.1 -0.2
P Ret N/A N/A N/A -1.5 0.0 0.7
KR N/A N/A N/A 4 1 7
Yds N/A N/A N/A 75 19.0 158
FC N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0
Ave N/A N/A N/A 18.8 19 22.6
TD N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0
PR N/A N/A N/A 10 0 3
Yds N/A N/A N/A 47 0 32
FC N/A N/A N/A 3 0 0
Ave N/A N/A N/A 4.7 0 10.7
TD N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0

 

 

Observations

    It is interesting to note that only Moreno and Ayers saw significant playing time on regular plays.  Moreno was on the field for 60% of Denver's offensive snaps, and Ayers was on the field for 41% of the defensive snaps.  After that, playing time for rookies began to tail off rather quickly: Smith (14%), McBath (12%), Quinn (7%), Bruton (7%).  Olsen, McKinney and Brandstater had no recorded statistics at PFF, and Schlueter was waived. Ayers has often been criticized for a lack of "production."  By production, I would assume that his critics are referring to tackles, sacks etc.  It is often missed that he had 17 quarterback pressures -- an act of forcing a quarterback to change what he is wanting to do -- which ranked 15th among all 68 players at the OLB position.

     Smith, Bruton, McBath, Quinn and McKinney all contributed on Special Teams. Bruton's 3.5 overall rating placed him 20th among the 930 players who played on special teams.  McBath's 2.5 rating put him in 41st place.  What these statistics do not show is the non-statistical participation of these players on special teams -- such as forcing an opposing player off his line of attack, throwing a block, etc.  Careful film review is needed to spy out these sorts of contributions.  This is especially true of Quinn.  His primary role when on the field for a special teams play was to be a blocker.

     It could be inferred that McDaniels prefers to play his veterans first, and bring the majority of his rookies along more slowly, though it must be admitted that this is purely speculation on my part.  When I mentioned this observation to Emmett Smith during a conversation recently, his response was something along the lines of: "Well, yeah.  Most head coaches prefer to play veterans over rookies."  What head coach will choose to play a rookie if he has a veteran with equivalent skills available?


    So what do we make of our rookie class, after Year 1?  I'm inclined to take the position that, with the exception of Moreno, given the limited participation we have in game situations, it is too early to tell precisely what we have in this set of rookies.  The player who the most playing time -- Moreno -- showed a great deal of promise.  Ayers had flashes of great play, so may just require time to develop more.  The rest of the class were pretty much middle of the pack in most areas, though that most likely is a result of limited playing time.

Comment 29 comments  |  8 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I am not usually a fan of PFF.....

…..but I like the way you have used their statistics to try and make sense of how our rookies fared this year. Moreno as a first year back with a banged up O line did an admirable job. He looks to go strength to strength. The more contact he gains early on in the game then the more he appears to be in the game and seems to enjoy the job of a hard nosed runner. I do worry about his injuries though. There seemed moments last season where we were ready to put the ball in his hands and he was a little banged up. We have seen what hits can do to power backs such as Jamal Lewis and LT and would hope Moreno could be as productive as either. There is a little worry in my mind.

I still think we got good pick in Ayers. Yes he seemed lost earlier. Although he was on the field for a small amount of the time this season I would be interested to see if that statistic increases as the season progressed. I think he needed this year to feel the speed of the NFL and get used to the scheme. I see no reason why he can’t also improve.

One thing that has made me wonder about the Mock Drafts for the 2010 draft is why some feel we will be interested in taking a corner in the first couple of rounds?? I was impressed with McBath when he came in at the number 2 corner spot in the season and thought he did a decent job in the nickel, far better than Ty Law did for us. I don’t see why he can’t start in the non too distant future. Alphonso Smith interests me, especially as to why he played so little. I liked him at WFU and thought if nothing else he would help in our kick return game. I cannot help getting past that he was injured for part of the season. I am hoping to see him have a decent offseason and contribute more effectively on defense. To me with his size, speed and his excellent coverage during his time in the ACC he should at least help us next year in the nickel game. With Dawkins and Bailey as mentors to the likes of McBath and Alphonso Smith I am in the optimistic camp that we should be set at the CB position for a while.

Quinn at first I thought was signed purely for his ST team play. He was a demon on ST at UNC and is a formidable blocker. Also he only had 12 catches in his whole college career. The Broncos as far as reports tell us are pretty sold on him having soft hands and want to develop his route running. We saw him in running and goal line situations last season. I think it will be interesting to see how Quinn is used in the preseason. There is hope that he could complement Graham as TE2 but I would like to see an increased production in the passing game to warrant that claim

by VABrit on Feb 26, 2010 5:47 PM MST reply actions  

Thanks for your thoughts, VB

I’m not totally sold on PFF either; but I do like the snap counts they offer as a basic way for comparing players at a position.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 26, 2010 7:48 PM MST up reply actions  

snapcounts alone

are worth their weight in gold. I would like to know how consistent the graders are from one team or game to the next, as that would assuage my own concerns a great deal. A consistent system has a lot of value, even if it isn’t 100%accurate.

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 26, 2010 9:25 PM MST up reply actions  

That's my objection to PFF

I cannot find a clear explanation of how they grade each play.

The largest value I see in PFF as a system is being able to compare the # of snaps a player was in for in comparison to the total number of offensive/defensive plays by the team for that season.

The second largest value is in the count of the various actions for that position — such as yards after first contact, or passes batted.

Figuring out how to use what they’ve presented is a work in progress. I mainly chose this format as a way to initiate discussion.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 26, 2010 9:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Hmm

You do realize that Mcbath mostly played safety right? he replaced Dawkins when he was out with an injury and aside from hail mary defense he wasn’t used at CB more than a few times if any. Early in the season Jack Williams played on the nickel until Law was signed.

by gyldenlove on Feb 26, 2010 7:58 PM MST up reply actions  

Excellent work again B and rec'd

The baffling part about A Smith was his limited participation on defense. It could be accounted for his injury he sustained or lack of performance. I tend to lean on both and the reason Ty Law was brought in. Whether or not he ever makes a wide out corner will yet to be seen. He may be a nickle CB when it’s all said and done.

Ayers started to impress me in the second half of the season and I can’t put a finger on the game, but their was an upgrade of his performance later on, which is expected from a first rounder. Again, whether he will ever achieve the top honors at OLB will have to be seen.

McKinley IMO did pretty well on special teams and to my thinking, he needs to bulk up a little, he seems too skinny.

Bar injury Moreno should have a 1000 yd season this year, especially if McD does his job and vamps up the OLine.

Overall grade I would give the draft is C-

by bfree2bronc on Feb 26, 2010 6:46 PM MST reply actions  

thanks bfree

I agree with you that our rookies showed promise in flashes. It’ll be interesting to see what happens in the off season & training camp.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 26, 2010 7:50 PM MST up reply actions  

REc'd dude...good job!

Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.

The guy formerly known as ZAPPA

by Tim Lynch on Feb 26, 2010 6:48 PM MST reply actions  

thanks Tim

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 26, 2010 7:50 PM MST up reply actions  

You can do better

If you were my student this is about where I would give a motivational speech about how you have more in you than this, but I will spare you that.

I would be very causious using their stats, they have for some reason left out 3 of Moreno’s fumbles and I wonder what else they may have forgotten. As for Mr Moreno, the really telling stats, average and YAC/attempt are abysmal, he did score a fair amount of TDs but did not get anywhere near showing enough to justify such a high draft pick, he is apparently the 2nd worst RB in the league in the passing offense which is surprising since his recieving and blocking were both highly touted.

Ayers did no matter how you dress it up not do well. He has a surprisingly high rating against the run, but since he mostly played in our passing package that may help explain it. Getting in the top 10 for batted passes is not that hard when you only need 1. Ayers coverage rating is misleading because he rarely covered, so considering the small sample size drawing a conclusion from that is dangerous at best.

Smith was easily the biggest disappointment as a rookie, while it is no surprise that Mcdaniels prefers to play veterans, it is surprising that he prefered to play a street free agent and a practice squad rookie ahead of Smith which to me shows that Smith was not trusted at all by the coaching staff. Scaling Smith’s numbers to match the number of snaps he could have played we arrive at approximately 15 PD, 100 receptions allowed which are not great numbers. Just a side note, I doubt Dawkins is ranked with the CBs, and if he is that definitely invalidates these statisitcs.

There is certainly a lot of growing to be done for the rooks, there is no doubt talent there and hopefully we will have some good players in them for years to come.

by gyldenlove on Feb 26, 2010 8:10 PM MST reply actions  

Thanks for jumping in

I think you have some good points.

I agree with you regarding PFF — as I’ve said elsewhere, I’m not totally sold on their system, but it does provide a convenient way to compare players since the base is the number snaps played.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 26, 2010 8:28 PM MST up reply actions  

Love the work, Brian

Great job – really fine research and analysis.

I noted a couple of things – Kenny McKinley did manage to return 3 punts for a total of 32 yards and 7 kickoffs, for a total of 158 yards, which isn’t bad. It was good for 22.6 yards per return. While he needs to be under Tuten’s tutelage for a while to strengthen that skinny body, he’s very fluid and elusive in space. He may take over the return work from Eddie Royal, which would be good for all – unless, of course, Denver signs Sproles, in which case all bets are off.

Quinn appeared to be struggling with the complexity of the playbook. He’s got the entire offseason to work on it – no excuses for next year. His route running isn’t bad and his hands really are pretty good. The offense in college didn’t use the TE for a receiver – it didn’t have anything to do with his skills. Some of the receivers from his college program are now in the NFL, so a receiving TE was an afterthought.

Smith did struggle and we don’t know the whole story. I can tell you this, and it applies to Eddie Royal, too. Charles Dimry used to play cornerback for the Broncos, back in the 1990’s. He’s a very nice man and has a quiet, philosophical air about him. He told me that the biggest quality a cornerback had to have, bar none, was the ability to forget the last play. Never mind if you got the INT or blew your coverage entirely. It’s a new play, and you have to be ready to do your all time best on it. tony Carter, in the little bit we saw him, looked like he understood that. Carter will contend for a job in training camp.

As to why Denver needs a corner soon – Bailey is very expensive and at the point in his career where he may be asked to take a pay cut to make the team more of a contender. We don’t know how he’ll respond. We have a better situation with Goodman (except for his tackling), but he’s in his 30’s. We need 5 good CBs. We are one short, even if Smith comes around and starts playing like he can. It’s a tough transition to the NFL.

Everyone knows that I found Ayers to be constantly improving. I’m impressed that the stats on him did record the things that he did well – like the 17 hurries. I will always recall the play where he was actually placed as the NT, was double teamed, spun out of the double team and hurried the QB. It’s hard to figure the crowd that doesn’t think that he’s first round material – he’s developing very fast. He’s not going to notch a bunch of sacks, but he’ll give you hurries, play good coverage and stop the run, which we really need. A couple of those hurries, by the way, turned into sacks for Doom, since the QB had nowhere to go.

Great article. I wish I could rec it twice.

Don't say rebuild - say reload...

by Doc Bear on Feb 26, 2010 8:18 PM MST reply actions  

I was going to mention McKinley

but you beat me to it Emmett. I agree that he needs to bulk up a bit. With some seasoning, he could take over the Returner position. Perhaps he will get more chances integrate there this year.
Really nice job Brian. Especially with the interpretation. I don’t know, but I think PFF is about the most comprehensive stat site out there, as far as the categories covered.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks

by KaptainKirk on Feb 26, 2010 9:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Royal needs to concentrate on his receiving duties and hope this is the case.
He may take over the return work from Eddie Royal, which would be good for all – unless, of course, Denver signs Sproles, in which case all bets are off

.

by bfree2bronc on Feb 26, 2010 11:24 PM MST up reply actions  

I know many Bronco fans out there wish we would have picked Orakpo over Ayers but consider this

Ayers had to learn a new position and entirely different defensive philosophy (3-4 and some 5-2) whereas Orakpo went to the more commonly played D in College – the 4-3. I’m not saying Orakpo would or wouldn’t have struggled had he been put in the same position as Ayers but it is something to consider. I am not great at the X’s and O’s of the game since I never played any organized ball but from what I have read it is a tough switch and takes some players more time than others to master (if at all). Just look at Aaron Kampman from Green Bay.

I for one am on the Ayers’ bench and think he will show improvement next year. I hope Smith also improves as well. I am glad to hear that both of these guys went to McD at the end of the year expressing their disappointment and desire to be a better player next year. Hopefully this year they pick it up and are able to run with it.

by BroncoMath101 on Feb 26, 2010 10:08 PM MST reply actions  

Excellent article, Brian. Rec'd. Very good discussion.

I had this up on my computer screen for about 6 hrs now and finally was able to go thru it.

I wanted to pass along a comment from either a Redskins newspaper article or a fan article about a possible change to a 3-4 (at that time a couple of months ago) and how it would affect Orakpo. The general feeling was that he is much more comfortable in the 4-3 and may not be as effective in the 3-4. This came from people who had watched his play much/most of the season.

My take on that: we got the more adaptable player in Ayers and the one more suited for our defensive scheme.

I didn’t think that our need for another CB was that intense. I guess that it really takes at least 2 years and more like 3 years to reload adequately into a top team.

Thanks Brian and everyone.

by Blackknigh on Feb 26, 2010 11:17 PM MST reply actions  

Interesting to hear about the Washington article

I had not heard that before.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 26, 2010 11:26 PM MST up reply actions  

I tried to put my finger on the article - but simply don't remember where I saw it.

It might be on SB Nation about 6 weeks ago either right before or at the time Shanahan was hired when therer was speculation about defensively going to the 3-4.

Sorry that I can’t produce it.

by Blackknigh on Feb 27, 2010 12:10 AM MST reply actions  

I found this article

http://www.csnwashington.com/pages/landing_redskins/?blockID=168681&feedID=2993

It describes issues facing the Redskins should they transition to a 3-4. This author thinks that Orakpo would do just fine in a 3-4, even though he struggled in a 4-3 when asked to go from a standing start. The author goes on at length about how Haynesworth would fit into a 3-4 scheme.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 27, 2010 12:33 AM MST up reply actions  

"fooled around" is a good way to put it

I remember Belicheck being asked once about the 3-4 scheme the Broncos were employing, and he hesitated to actually call it a “scheme”.

I believe he used the word “gimmick”….

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 27, 2010 10:38 PM MST up reply actions  

Great work B, rec'd

he is being ranked against all 198 CBs to be on the field in 2009 — this means he is being compared to such players as Dawkins and Bailey.

Is Dawkins a typo there, or did I misread something?

I’ve really gotten into the PFF also. I keep hearing compaints about it. But I always say there’s no problem if there’s no solution. It’s the most comprehensive site I’ve found (thanks to your last post), and as you say, it’s a starting point.

I’ve got a warm feeling about Moreno. I think Ayers will continue to improve and agree with some of the comments above, in that just simple eye balls seem to say he got better as the season progressed. The learning curve for him is expected to take longer anyway, as he’s not just transitioning to the speed of the game, but also to standing up.

I really like what I’ve seen form both Bruton and McBath. Their stats aren’t mouth dropping or anything, but I think there’s certainly a future there.

As for Phonz, since I don’t see any post from McGeorge up above, I’ll just go ahead and say it for him: Wish we had our pick back from Seattle this year. I’m not saying Phonz won’t be great someday, but he was nothing last year. It would be hard to imagine not being able to get a better immediate pick this year if we still had at. Also for Coach’s sake, if Phonz doesn’t work out soon, he will alwyas be the battle cry, the ammunition people use to be anti-McD when we lose in the near future. But the worst part about it in my eyes, is that whether he drastically improves this year or not, the front office is going to have to spend resources before we will know. They can’t take the chance of having Ty Law be our best option again.

Anyway, great work.

Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!

by Alex on Feb 27, 2010 10:45 AM MST reply actions  

good looking out for McGeorge there lol!

I’m ready for McX to make up for that (Phonz) mistake this year! I do like that he wasn’t afraid to go for it. The risks he takes this year might make or break him …but i hope he takes some, so we know one way or the other, just how good our front office and coach really are.

by Whidbey Bronco on Feb 27, 2010 6:48 PM MST up reply actions  

The Dawkins inclusion was a missed edit on my part

I had started to make a comment that included Dawkins and Bailey, decided against it, but missed on removing Dawkins. Duh.

I’m pretty much with you on our rookies. I’ve joined the “let’s wait and see camp.” The comment I keep hearing from various sources is that it takes around 3 years for a young player to fully develop. If I see improvement in our rookies next year, I’ll be content to wait for the 3rd year to see if they pan out. If they regress next year, I’ll have some serious concerns.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 27, 2010 11:09 AM MST reply actions  

that was supposed to be under Elvis' comment, grrrrrr

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 27, 2010 11:09 AM MST up reply actions  

Haha, I got ya

The three year rule seems to be the common consensus. Although, I think it’s taken out of context and often used as a crutch. No proof; I’m no talent evaluator. But in my mind, it probably takes three years to FULLY evaluate a draftee. If the guy is a star in year-one, I think we’ve got our answer. If he’s a non-factor, we obviously have to wait. If he’s a non-factor again the next year, well, I think the jury is already coming back to the court room. There’s always exceptions, 4th rounders making immediate impact or 2nd rounders showing nothing for 2-3 years then blowing up. There’s also the depth factor. I mean from a fan perspective, we’re not going to see McBath’s progress much when he’s baking up Dawk. Linemen in Minnesota aren’t going to get as much reps or chances because they’ve got all-stars in front of them.

Like I said, I just think the three year rule is used too often as a crutch. I mean we’re not going to hear somebody say it about Michael Oher or Clay Mathews. All-in-all, though, I just think it’s too generalized.

I’m with your idea on Phonz. I’m content to wait and see, and not really too worried at this point. But if he doesn’t show up next year, I’ll be more than worried. The singular thing that stands out most to me, about Smith, is that we NEEDED him last year. He was getting reps and being treated as the nickle all along. Yet, he still couldn’t, for whatever reason, handle the nickle spot to the degree we had to replace him with a lesser rookie then bring in Ty Law off the streets. So I guess maybe I am worried about him a little =)
Whew, k, done ramblin!

Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!

by Alex on Feb 27, 2010 1:06 PM MST up reply actions  

No worries about the ramblin'

and I think you’re spot on:


we NEEDED him last year

and he didn’t show up the way anyone anticipated

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Feb 27, 2010 1:13 PM MST up reply actions  

The oddest thing to me was that he did

He came in and had an immediate impact for us in the first couple of game and played quite well. Suddenly, he couldn’t stop a shopping cart. There is often more to these things than we know and this could be one of those times. I’m pretty comfortable giving him time to develop, and part of that is based in that early burst of obvious skill. I’m sure that the team’s patience will be limited, cost or no, but what seemed to be coming easily to him suddenly went to heck. I’d love to know why.

By the way, it wasn’t training camp, so it wasn’t just poor competition. This was regular season

Don't say rebuild - say reload...

by Doc Bear on Feb 27, 2010 5:53 PM MST reply actions  

agreed

something changed.

Precision in thought, concision in style, decision in life.

"That's MR.Styg..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 27, 2010 10:39 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

P1_plummer_small
For those Bronco Fans Who have served....
Imgres_small
Are You Nuts? No Plan B?
Oc_small
I NEED YOUR HELP MHR: The Down Under Bowl

Recent FanPosts

Angels_small
Moreno Out the Door this Offseason
Small
What Do You Expect From Our Draftees ?
Small
An in depth look at "PLAN A"
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick Really Worth? Pt. 2.
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
Glad for Gronkowski
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick REALLY Worth?
Index_small
Nate Irving!
Fhgfhgfhg_small
Rod Smith is a Hall of Famer....Right?
205783_109706759113985_100002239833864_101133_7230028_n_small
My Final 53

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Broncos-von-miller_small Scotty Payne

Ph_small BroncoPH

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall