The Andra Davis Conundrum - Who Fills in??
The Broncos surprised everyone - mostly - by releasing ILB Andra Davis yesterday. Perhaps people are most surprised that the Broncos seemingly don't have someone to take Davis' place. It is obvious that Davis did not fit into the future plans for the Broncos and they did the 9-year vet a favor by making the move now. It allows Davis to find work early in the free agent process. That is a classy move - despite leaving a glaring hole in the Broncos LB corps.
So what cost Davis his job with the Broncos? Flexibility, likely. That is the calling card of the Josh McDaniels way - players that can play multiple positions in multiple situations. That means, when at all possible, your linebackers cannot be 2-down players. Davis was a liability on 3rd Down, and as the season went on he became a liability in the run game. McDaniels wants players that can play 3-downs. That limits the vulnerability that the Broncos defense would face if team go no-huddle - limiting substitution ability.
So who fills the hole left by Davis? Good question, but not a question without answers. Here are some of the options -
Free Agents - The Broncos could dip back into the free agent pool if they desire. There are several players available, though each has concerns.
RESTRICTED FREE AGENTS -
Kirk Morrison(3rd Round Tender, Raiders) It was a surprisingly low tender that Morrison received, but the lack of interest from teams so far is a major red flag that something could be wrong. Morrison definitely took a step backward last season, but losing, combined with the daily grind that goes along with being an Oakland Raider can take it's toll. Morrison has been a Mike linebacker most of his career, so there are questions about whether or not he could play in a 3-4 scheme as the run-stuffing ILB. At 6-2, 240, he has good size to fit the bill. He is also 3-years younger than Davis. Keep in mind that Broncos DC Wink Martindale was the linebackers coach in Oakland and is very familiar with Morrison.
Tim Dobbins (5th Round Tender, Chargers) Just as enticing as Morrison, Dobbins was given just a 5th Round tender by the Chargers. Dobbins has been mostly a backup in San Diego but is ready to break out. At 27 he is still young and is familiar with the 3-4 system the Broncos are running. Broncos D-Line coach Wayne Nunnely is familiar with Dobbins when he was with the Chargers.
UNRESTRCITED FREE AGENTS
Keith Bulluck(UFA, Titans) Bulluck has been a stalwart for the Titan defense but injuries have become a concern. Before getting hurt, Bulluck was enjoying his best season in years, proving that after 10 years he could still get the job done. The Broncos have shown they are not afraid to go after solid leaders despite age(re: Brian Dawkins) so Bullock could be an option later in the off-season. He's primarily played outside as well.
Antonio Pierce(UFA, Giants) another solid veteran coming off an injury. Many think Pierce's neck injury could be career threatening, and was enough for the Giants to release their defensive captain. Pierce has good size to play in the middle, and like Bulluck, is a solid locker room presence.
Akin Ayodele(UFA, Dolphins) Ayodele isn't flashy but he plays a solid linebacker and will get the job done - cheaper than some of the options above. Ayodele has plenty of experience in the 304, playing for Bill Parcells in Dallas and Miami. How much of an upgrade Ayodele would be over Davis is a big question, being that the two players are the same age.
CURRENT BRONCOS
What about in-house options? One name that should be kept in mind is Spencer Larsen. Fans have been clamoring for Larsen to get his chance on defense after proving his nose for the football as a special teams ace and fullback on offense. The Special Teams experience impresses me the most. Most linebackers get their start in the NFL on special teams - guys like Bulluck and James Harrison in Pittsburgh were special teams standouts before becoming Pro Bowl linebackers. At 6-2, 243 Larsen has the perfect size to play inside and he has proven he has a nose for the football. Could this be the time for Larsen to get an opportunity to play?
Some people think the Mario Haggan could make the move inside as well. Haggan started primarily outside last season, though he does have the size to play inside(6-3, 267). That is a lateral move, however, and the Broncos either need to get more talented inside, or get younger. Haggan does neither.
If the Broncos are going to make a move on a RFA, it is likely to happen soon. Team have until April 15th to sign another team's RFA to a tender.
If the team is looking at Unrestricted players, the process could take longer - especially with the guys coming off of injury. The Broncos could simply wait until after the draft to bring a guy in, depending on who they are able to select. The Broncos are likely to pick a linebacker during the draft regardless of which way they go. Now I ask you - what do you want the Broncos to do at Linebacker?
1 recs |
132 comments
|
Comments
No
Its when the intestines become inflamed or constricted to the point of restriction or blockage. Sometimes a portion of the intestines must be removed.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
gross. but hasnt he been playing with it through high school? he should be fine, right?
or will it lead to worse things later in his career?
I had a friend with it and it can waylay you out of the blue.
Just makes him a risky pick IMHO.
Man is not a rational animal, he is a rationalizing animal.
by MrFNSunshine on Mar 12, 2010 9:19 AM MST up reply actions
Bowel Obstruction surgery is no picnic
I have been there and done that.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
The fact he
never missed a game at Alabama tells you he knows how to manage his condition.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
Actually, the condition is capricious
It can do well for a long time and then deteriorate without warning. I’ve mentioned this, but it’s important – his past record doesn’t tell you that he knows how to manage the condition. It tells you that the condition hasn’t gone into a truly bad exacerbation at this time – that is not an indication of the future.
It’s fine for folks to disagree on what to do next, if anything, on this, but it’s important for all concerned to be basing their discussions on medical facts. We don’t know what will happen with him. I hope, for the man’s sake, that he is fortunate and it doesn’t flare badly, but despite medication and proper diet, it can still change rapidly for the worse. That’s just the nature of the disease.
It all starts with the lines
And because an earthquake hasn't happened in SF the last 6 years means it won't happen next year either.
Imagination is more important than knowledge. A. Einstein
In house or .....
Fill it in house with Larsen or Woodyard. Draft a lower round guy, or make a move for Dobbins
by mark eaton on Mar 12, 2010 7:59 AM MST via mobile reply actions
Woodyard
Is a specialist not starter material.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
I didn't vote
Mario haggan moving to MLB wasn’t an option.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
Cuz we don't have a MLB?
just joshing you 3ns.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
Hey John, I noticed that
in your presentation of possibilities, Wesley Woodyard was totally omitted.
On the current depth chart (denverbroncos.com, “as of Jan 5, 2010”) Woodyard is listed as a 2nd string ILB.
Also, while I know many (if not most folks here) do not buy into Pro Football Focus’ rating system (I have doubts about it myself), Woodyard was on the field for a lot of snaps (Davis 547, Woodyard 368). Woodyard also graded out as the 2nd best Denver ILB against the run.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
Hmmmm
Maybe I should take back my previous comment about Woodyard.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
I tend to agree with you...
At 6-0, 222, Woodyard is a bit undersized to play the run-stuffing ILB. Look at McClain – 250lbs, big man. Woodyard is a playmaker more than a runstuffer in my opinion, though the ratings seem to say something different.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Maybe
Its because he was in on pass plays and was productive when offensive decided to run in those situations. Just a guess.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
Not too dump too hard on Wesley
but I seem to remember a whole lot of touchdown passes tossed over his head to the guy he was covering last season. Maybe these weren’t all his fault but I do remember saying out loud “WOODYARD!!!!” a few times last season when the other team scored.
by John in Castle Rock on Mar 12, 2010 9:27 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Don't say that too loud John...you'll get in trouble..
Tight Ends exposed him all season and he was part of the problem and I know McD see’s it and will correct it. Either he learns how to play in coverage or he will be doing ST work until they cut or trade him. We can wish in one hand what he could be (but isn’t) and spit in the other, but it isn’t going to change how he plays.
by bfree2bronc on Mar 12, 2010 10:13 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I hear you
I really liked Woodyard from day one, but last year he appeared to get lit up just like you said.
by John in Castle Rock on Mar 12, 2010 11:14 AM MST up reply actions
Wood doesn't have the typical build
but when I scouted him coming out of college he struck me as one of the “cleanest” LBs I had seen in a while. This is a wasted skill on the outside except in lateral support froma WLB to the strongside running game. In short, he kept himself clean in the garbage aroudn the line with amazing instincts. Add that to an elite “nose for the ball” and he has the right stuff to move closer to the inside (though never a true MLB in a 4-3, so 3-4WILB suits him better).
With the added focus on the DL, we could be seeing a red carpet rolled out to welcome a pass coverage, durable,multi-down playmaker to the starting rotation. And his name might be Wood-Yard.
There's a big hard sun, beating on the big people, in the big hard world.
formerly Styg-like
by Jeremy Bolander on Mar 12, 2010 12:30 PM MST up reply actions
I like Larsen and Haggan as well
gosh I like the Broncos…
There's a big hard sun, beating on the big people, in the big hard world.
formerly Styg-like
by Jeremy Bolander on Mar 12, 2010 12:33 PM MST up reply actions
i agree
I think the combination of Larsen on run downs and Woodyard on passing downs might do the trick, both are young enough and should continue to improve.
The defense this year should have a ton of looks and with these guys on the roster: Dumervil, DJ, Woodyard, Ayers, Haggan, Barrett (lined up a bit at LB in training camp), Larsen and anyone they draft, the LB’s will be fine.
Combination?
The Guru stated above that it is likely Andra Davis doesn’t fit in future plans b/c he was only a 2 down LB. Woodyard consistently had to come in on 3rd downs. McX simply doesn’t want to have to do that anymore, they are looking for versatility.
I agree on looking for versatility
However, given the current roster who do you see as that versatile 3-down ILB?
If someone is drafted then that would change the situation, but as of right now unless you believe Larsen is a 3-down linebacker, then Davis’s replacement from within the organization, will be a combination of 2 or 3 guys on the team. The guys who combine to play ILB will depend on the formation being run (5 man front, basic 3-4, nickel, dime, etc.). I also think that if MC/X didn’t want to shuffle LB’s depending on the down and distance, the team they are playing, etc. then they will probaly end up dumping guys like Woodyard who fit into a specific role and are not ideally versatile.
Mays
Do something out of leftfield, like take Mays in the first round and convert him to backer
by mark eaton on Mar 12, 2010 8:02 AM MST via mobile reply actions
Mays...
I think he would struggle trying to shed blocks, taking away what he does well – fly around and find the ball. It’s been a popular topic because of his size, but getting o-linemen off his legs is not a strong suit.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Good call
In the heat of the moment I see a guy at 230 6’3" who I’d use like a guided missile. But you’re right, it would mean him being able to shed blocks more than he has ever shown
by mark eaton on Mar 12, 2010 8:24 AM MST via mobile up reply actions
I remember last year when some were saying similar things about Clay Mathews and Brian Cushing..
I have wondered how we would have done if we would of taken either one of those STUDS when everyone on here was sceaming Rey Maualuga? Thhings don’t go the way we want them to and players don’t play the same way in the nfl as they do in college either.
Mays better pray that's the
case since his play was increasingly exposed year after year in college.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Mar 12, 2010 2:25 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
Dobbins
He has a fifth-round tender, but the Broncos don’t have a fifth-round pick. How would that work?
Denver
would give up a 4th round or make a trade.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
Or go find a 5th rounder somewhere
Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!
sheffler and a 6th
for a 4th and 5th. deal the 5th for Dobbins.
Then it would be Sheffler and a 6th for Dobbins and a 5th.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe they would have to acquire a 5th round pick highe then their original 5th round pick. I was under the impression that to sign a tender, you must have your original pick in that round, or a higher pick.
I'm not sure off hand
I know that if you have two picks in a round, like Seattle’s 6th and 14th, then you have to give your own or higher, meaning their 6th. But I don’t know if the rule applies if they got rid of their 6th and only had the 14th.
Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!
it could be
that if you dont have a draft pick in that round, then you have to give up your next pick. (ie: if you sign a 5th round tender and don’t have one, then you must give up your 4th round pick)
This hasn’t been addressed because we are always talking about first round tenders, and there is nothing higher then that.
If someone knows the rules on how this would work, can you please post it
Pick
It has to be equal or greater than your original pick. So in this casr Denver would have to get a 5th higher than the one they traded to New England.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
I don't think you cut a guy on possibility
I also don’t think that we need to look outside of who was playing ILB last year. Woodyard seems like a great possibility, or I wouldn’t be surprised if Haggan slides in.
But...
One decision isn’t dependent on the other. I mean, if you decide that Andra Davis is not part of the solution, cut him loose – even if you don’t know exactly what you are going to do…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
I agree
I think they might not have it sorted what the next step is.. but they just felt that Davis was not what they where after either as a starter or a backup..
Personally i think we may see a combination of Larsen and Woodyard next year in that spot doing a similar thing to what Davis and Wood where doing.. I’m not sure of Larsen’s coverage abilityh but i doubt he is as much of a liability as Davis was in coverage.. and Larsen CAN run stuff.. he just hasn’t been given his opportunity yet.
I am intrigued by Griesen but not convinced he will play a part.
I would love for us to take McClain if the Bronco’s medical staff are convinced that it wouldn’t hinder him especially with the advanced treatment he would receive with the club. But i certainly have my doubts about him as well.
I could also see a free agent acquisition but i am not knowledgeable enough about other teams rosters to pick one..
Don’t the bucs need a receiver? Barret Ruud has a first round tender on him..
by HorseStance on Mar 12, 2010 12:10 PM MST up reply actions
If he is not part of the solution
but is widely respected in the league, why not try to trade him for a late pick or a late pick in 2011?
"Truth only reveals itself when one gives up all preconceived ideas." -- Shoseki
Ummmmm yes they are
Unless a guy is a total liability that you are confident anyone you bring in is an upgrade you don’t cut that guy until you’ve got his position covered.
If we were talking about decision making in general I might agree with you, but since we’re talking about fielding the best 53 people that you can I totally disagree. They have some plan in place for the guys that they have. Now I’m not saying that they won’t go get another guy to compete, but you just don’t leave open the possibility of a hole in the roster.
by Fan in Exile on Mar 12, 2010 2:50 PM MST up reply actions
Jarvis Moss
They have not cut the guy yet and I wonder if they are considering moving the guy to ILB from OLB … Just putting it out there. What do you think?
depending on the draft
Moss may have an uphill climb to make the roster. His body type of tall and lanky will make it very difficult for him to play on the inside, guards and centers will have no trouble getting leverage on him, or cutting him down enitrely.
Can we trade him to a
NBA team? Perhaps we trade Moss for Iverson and let him run the Wild Horses. :)
Committing random acts of Brandon since 2006...
the answer's too drunk...
at least according the Stephen A Smith
Because Montana has no professional sports, I gotta support the land of my birth.
Socrates was once executed for 'trolling'.
^Needs explaining: don't call someone asking uncomfortable, slightly antagonistic questions trolls. In all odds they probably just want to learn. It's real easy to differentiate a 'Socratic' post from a trolling one (unless you're a resident of WCG).
^Needs further explaining: I have yet to post anything on WCG, don't worry, I'm not trying to rationalize anything I've done. I've just lurked over there and man, they are the model of post-peloponnesian war Athens.
Thanks John
How come you have only included RFAs that have the lower tenders? I’m not sure what tender DeMeco Ryans has on him. More than likely a 1st and 3rd. My question is this. If say we were going to draft a Center aand an ILB in the 1st 3 rounds as I suspect, but we do indeed have an in house C, as others have proclaimed, Why not give up a 1st and 3rd for a guy with Ryan’s potential?
Ryans does have a 1 and 3
That is a helluva price to play for one player. First, you’ll have to sign him to a deal that would keep Houston from matching, probably close to Peppers money. Then, on top of it, you lose two high draft picks?
Yowsers. The 1 and 3 tender is as close as it gets to making a guy unrestricted….
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
MLB is just not that valuable
Ryans is one of the better MLB in the entire league, but the resources to acquire him are just not worth it. Every year it seems there are options out there at ILB (Ray Lewis last year not getting the huge contract he wanted, Maulauga going in the second round, Laurinitas going in the second round). Not to say that these guys are worth more then Ryans, but for far less money and significantly fewer draft resources there are options year in and year out.
I would rather gamble that a guy like Spikes is there in the second round, then give a 1 and 3 plus huge money to Ryans
I'd rather just give up the 3rd
for Morrison who’s a good enough player to fit into the system.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Mar 12, 2010 9:46 AM MST up reply actions
My thoughts are two-phase...
First consider strongly the in-house options while adding later round value for developmental depth and ST help…Maybe target players like Micah Johnson / Pat Angerer / Jerry Hughes / Sergio Kindle
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
Jerry Hughes is a stud Rich.
A couple of players later in the rds like 7th are Adrian Tracy out of William and Mary, Chris McCoy of Middle Tennessee.
Agreed...Both Hughes or Kindle would be strong contributors onh ST right away...
And would make serious runs at rotation playing time while they learn the NFL Game
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
by BroncoSense72 on Mar 12, 2010 10:07 AM MST up reply actions
Aren’t Hughes and Kindle primarily pass-rushers, or OLBs in our scheme?
Kindle reminds me way too much of Jarvis Moss, and I wouldn’t touch him with anything but a 4th rounder or later, regardless of which team I was drafting for. I think Hughes translates to OLB as well, but I think I saw something that he could play inside… or did I get my guys mixed up?
Yes.
Neither played LB in college so going from DE to ILB is one heck of an adjustment.
In fact, I can’t think of one person who’s done it……….
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
By the way
I was surprised by the move yet I couldn’t see Davis on the roster past this year. So it wasn’t like a big deal.
Colinski had an interesting idea on another thread. Replace him in house but don’t replace his roster spot.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
I think we will upgrade the position in house and in the draft.
Maybe it is time for Larsen to step up and be what he is supposed to be. We all know how versitile he is and valuable to the team, and he can tackle with authority. I have never seen him in pass coverage…Not saying he hasn’t done it before, I just don’t recollect seeing him do it.
Woodyard might cut the mustard if he bulked up 15-20 lb. I don’t believe he could hold up to some of the TE’s in the league.
Draft a player that can do all three of the important plays- pass rush, run stop and pass cover. This is the type of prospect McD/X will be targeting in the draft and there are a few: Rolando McClain, Sean Lee, Sean Weatherspoon, Brandon Spikes, Pat Angerer and Taylor Mays who might be a good choice because he is fast enough to play safety and big enough to take on the ILB. Remember…versitility counts in McD/X decision making.
+1
I know you’ve been a little critical of WW, but I agree with this. The plan is likely already in place, an in-house solution. They’ll likely draft for the position also. I think we’ll know if Wood’s the guy if he’s bulked up by TC. As far as he goes, he did get four TD’s thrown against him. But remember, he was undrafted in ’08 – quite the progression to already be the coverage-substitute by ’09.
As for run stopping, remember his first game? Ten solo tackles when he came in for an injured DJ? Wood adds weight and this is a different topic all together.
Good luck with the Redskins Mr. Mike! I'll be watching and cheering for a non-Bronco team for the first time in my life. Well, except when they play the Broncos!
Agreed.
Go fellow Cats!
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
Go UofA Wildcats
who go on Mormon missions, just like I did and come to my Broncos and start at fullback and linebacker! I love the UofA because I served in Tucson and I love UTEP after serving in El Paso. The Miners are tearing it up in college basketball!
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Mar 12, 2010 3:24 PM MST up reply actions
Agreed TJ
In fact I’d be surprised if we take an ILB before the 6th round if at all especially if we only have the 6 picks currently held by the time draft day arrives.
The QB position is set.
by broncofaninIL on Mar 13, 2010 9:06 PM MST up reply actions
Any one of the three plays out of USC...
And my point with Taylor Mays. 6’3 230 and runs sub 4.4/40. He can play free safety, cornerback or inside linebacker. He does need some work with his feet, but I don’t see a problem with the transitioning of him. McD wants physical, smart, tough and versitile players, so here you are.
I was thinking the same thing.
My question is are we willing to spend #11 on a player that has never been a linebacker before to play linebacker? That being said, I think he has a ton of potential as an ILB.
by black_knight101 on Mar 13, 2010 9:54 AM MST up reply actions
Give Larsen a chance...
When Spencer Larsen was given a chance to start his rookie year because of injuries, he was all over the field. I really think he can step in right away and play. This move also means that we will have to draft an ILB in April. If McClain isnt there at 11, I really like Jamar Chaney from Miss St. He ran a 4.51 at the combine (faster than Moreno) and is a 3 down ILB who will be available in the 2nd or 3rd round.
First things first, let Larsen lose the job as he has paid his dues.
Trends?
How much did the changes in personnel in DL affect the release of Davis?
Let’s say that Jamal Williams and Justin Bannon start with perhaps Ronald Fields as the three down linemen. Those three could occupy at least four if not all five OL.
IMO now the ILBs necessary skills rate tackling #1, pass coverage #2, pass rush #3, and shedding blocks #4. Wouldn’t that upgrade Larsen and Woodyard for that position more than Haggan?
Just asking?
by ivanthenotsobad on Mar 12, 2010 9:26 AM MST reply actions
It might ivan, but we will probably see a pick taken somewhere in the draft.
McD addressed the OLB with Ayers at 18 last year and that showed that OLB was a top priority of him. I don’t see any reason to not think that ILB might be a top priority in this draft. Guards and Centers aren’t what you would call high draft picks and they will be addressed 2nd through 7th. I look for either a DT- Dan Williams, ILB- Rolando McClain or CB-Joe haden at #11. Just my gut feeling and trying to narrow it down to one player is tough.
Gaurds and centers aren't what you call high draft picks
Neither is Inside LB.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
What are saying then...Best Player Available or best player for need?
by bfree2bronc on Mar 12, 2010 10:06 AM MST up reply actions
Best impact player
But everything has to be flexible. If the greatest impact player can be gotten later and another player you want is available now then you got to get him. Kind of like the situation lasr year with Ayers and Moreno. Truthfully I see McClain as big a reach at 311 as Pouncey or Iupati.
I’m just going by tradition and last year the explanation I got as to the reason why MLB from USC fell last year was because he was a MLB.
That is what is so crazy about Denver’s draft this year is that the positions of need are the positions that usually go later in the draft. IMO
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
What about Patrick Willis and
Jerod Mayo? Both ILBs in a 3-4 defense in the pros. Willis was taken at #11 and Mayo at #10. Both out of the SEC. Both LBers of the year in that conference.
Not all that unlike a certain Mr. McClain….
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
Mayo is not a FA though
Mayo was drafted by the New England Patriots with the tenth overall pick in the 2008 NFL Draft. He was signed on July 24, 2008, to a five-year contract (rather than the six-year maximum allowed by the NFL’s collective bargaining agreement) worth $18.9 million, including $13.8 million in bonuses and guarantees.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
Not talking about signing them....
3nS called McClain’s position, ILB, a reach to draft a player there. See:
Truthfully I see McClain as big a reach at 311 as Pouncey or Iupati.
I’m just going by tradition and last year the explanation I got as to the reason why MLB from USC fell last year was because he was a MLB.
I was just pointing out that twice in the last few years it has happened, suggesting that for the right player 11 would not be a reach for a MLB.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
Oh, sorry
I apparently skimmed right over that part.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
Rey
Fell because he wasnt considered a 3 down LB. With the league becoming so much more passing oriented, a LB that cant cover isnt really valuable not matter how hard they can hit.
Pass rushers and CBs are the premium defensive positions these days.
I stand corrected.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
bf2b
Agree – McX addressed OLB last year with Ayers – and Reid. They had Dumervil, Haggan and Moss and a new system. It looked to be one of our most glaring weaknesses.
IMO they got lucky with Dumervil and Haggan developing nicely. So Ayers and Reid gave them flexibility and good rotation, etc.
I agree with your assessment of the draft progression with this caveat – I think it will follow BPA pretty closely. The three you mention – Dan Williams, Rolando McClain and Joe Haden – if available would, at least currently, higher than any OL available at that pick.
However, I’m starting to change my mind about OGs and OCs not being worth high draft picks. With the change to the 3-4 defense around the league, to me it’s becoming increasingly clear that OCs and OGs with size and quickness are becoming almost a necessity (we learned the hard way last year). I’d not be surprised if a OT were picked in the 1st round in someone like Okung fell to #11 (maybe even Anthony Davis, though there are mixed opinions about him). Just my growing feeling.
by ivanthenotsobad on Mar 12, 2010 11:05 AM MST up reply actions
Folks,,,,McClain's value is high, but now the risk is real!
I’d say 2 easy high value, low cost options in draft are as follows;
1. Micah Johnson – Kentucky!
2. Jamar Chaney – Miss St
I have to admit(as an anti raider) that Morrison would be an excellent fit, and of course our new DC (Wink) knows him better than everyone else, and who supported his drafting by the Raiders!
"Attitude reflects Leadership" Hogblog...aka KSM
Agree on Morrison
It pains me to say that about a guy in black, but it’s true. He’s 28, so he still has a lot left in the tank. I like him for a 3rd.
by T.Dot_Bronco on Mar 12, 2010 9:49 AM MST up reply actions
haha, I love how you put an exclamation point after Kentucky.
It made me smile.
Also, Wesley Woodyard was from Kentucky. Just something to keep in mind.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by kentuckybronco on Mar 12, 2010 10:50 AM MST up reply actions
The "risk is real" with McClain?
As opposed to everyother draft pick that is risk free?
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
Reid
If Reid heals up could he be a possibility?
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
Disruption
I am not ready to say this was a bad move, as weakness in the middle is one area that many of us have questioned, but my pause for concern is that the more disruption you have on a team, the less likely that the professed team emphasis will really stay and take hold in the locker room. Loyalty is a two-way street and the more players sense that they are temporary cogs in the machine, the less likely they are to buy completely into the program.
Many of the free agent fixes and signings are of a finger in the dike nature and are short term solutions. The really good programs don’t have all that much turnover.
Let’s see how this plays out. I am taking a wait-and-see attitude this year and am hoping to chill out on the coach in his sophomore year.
by Baltimore Bronco on Mar 12, 2010 9:37 AM MST reply actions
"Really good programs don't have much turnover."
It does when the program is first instituted. The average turnover for a NFL team is a quarter to a third every year. Just room for draftees make turnover greater than 10%.
Davis was a stopgap that stopped sooner than expected. That is a good thing.
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
I have to take in consideration of the limited amount of evaluation period McD/X/Nolan had last year.
If the coach had more time to evaluate and look at players on the big board do you think they would have taken Robert Ayers at 18? When prospects like Clay Mathews or Brian Cushing were still on the board? Granted they targeted a potential pass rusher and felt Dre’ Davis would fill in the role needed at ILB. What they didn’t look at or realize was Antonio Gates get’s our attention twice a year. Davis being a 2 down player was his demise, we need someone on the field who can do all of the functions needed, not just situational players.
by bfree2bronc on Mar 12, 2010 10:04 AM MST up reply actions
Decisions, decisions
BB – I viewed the release of Davis as partly considerate. I think they knew that he did not fit the versatile skill set that they were looking for in ILB. I also think they loved his locker room presence – leadership, discipline, attitude – and would have kept him for that and a situational role.
However, I also think that they thought that he could play more productively somewhere else and released him early to give as much chance as possible.
The NFL can be brutal in the business sense and sometimes you can only do so much to be gracious.
by ivanthenotsobad on Mar 12, 2010 9:51 AM MST reply actions
Good Thought
You are right ivan, and if that was the motive, good, but unless a player is a bust, I like to let them fight the battle on the field, and not lose it in roster shuffling. I tend to like people who fit different roles in an organization, and from my very limited vantage point, Davis was a real contributor last year. Players notice who gave their all, and when they are dumped, players may not comment, but may well feel that they are next on the chopping block. If they thought that there was no way Davis could compete next summer, well, then it was a good move, but sometimes players compete too well and ruin April free agent and draft revised depth charts.
by Baltimore Bronco on Mar 12, 2010 9:59 AM MST up reply actions
I'm pretty surprised by the timing of this move
Why now. IMO this says something about how we’ll approach the draft in regards to run stopping LBs. I’d say we won’t be going after one there… if that was the plan, we’d want to keep him until we were assured of getting our guy. I’d say we may be targeting a guy in the draft or free agency but the contingency plan in this case must be an existing guy, right? This, to me, says much about how comfortable we are with the guys we have if all else fails.
Finally, if I were McX and had no negative info on him, I’d offer a trade (4th) for Morrison and then give up the pick if they don’t go for it. The guy’s good.
Denver doesn't have a 5th
So if they sign Morrison it will be for the 4th
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
Morrison is available...
for a 3rd Round tender. It is Dobbins that has the 5th Round tender. Whidbey is trying to get Morrison for a 4th instead of a 3rd….
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Thanks
Good move Whitbey!!!
... if you have a belief, you will tend to find things that support it. But if you have a prejudice, you’ll move heaven and earth to maintain it. BroncoBear
one never knows...
now that Shanny’s gone Al probably doesn’t hate us quite as much…
by Whidbey Bronco on Mar 12, 2010 10:20 AM MST up reply actions
If internal, I hope it's Haggan.
That would mean #56 had a solid camp and is ready to play three downs outside, and we keep one of our best players on the field. Larsen is an enigma along the lines of Peyton Hillis. Spencer showed flashes in 2008, but before he was hurt against Atlanta and certainly afterwords, Haggan outplayed him and went from roating series to full-time starter the last couple games.
If you go by Iven’s categories above, it would have to be Mario. He’s the best takeler out of the bunch, and he was one of the best tackelers on the entire team last year. He also held up nicey in pass coverage when he was asked to drop last year, and did very good when playing mike in 2008 (outplaying Larsen). I also think he would be a nice pass rusher and able to shed blocks better or as good as Spencer or Woodyard.
I’m suprised Woodyard is even in the discussion. He looked great filling in for DJ in 2008 @ Will and I was really excited to see how he’d contribute in 2009, but I was very disappointed. How many redzone TD’s and PI’s did he have? He also looked out of place a lot in the running game. I’m actually suprised he hasn’t been released yet, and will not be shocked if he’s a camp casualty. Even though he was subpar in both pass coverage and run stuffing last year on third down he kept Larsen off the field, so what does that say?
What about Greisen? He was hurt last year in camp and has a ton of experiance. I doubt he’s the reason the move was made, but he could be in the mix for sure.
Ideally, I’d like to see the club draft a young thumper somewhere in rounds two-four to come in and compete with Haggen and Greisen. Perhaps Larsen or Woodyard are kept for depth over Greisen if he doesn’t win the job because of their special teams value, but I wouldn’t be suprised if neither is on the 53 man roster.
"At 6-2, 240, he has good size to fit the bill."
At 6’1", 242, everyone was saying this time last year that D.J. Williams was too small to play ILB. What gives?
No clue
But I am pulling for Larsen. I just like players like him who seem to take an average or even somewhat limited base level of talent and turn it into something that is pretty useful through effort.
No talent?
Larsen takes good angles, plays on both sides of the ball, and is a standout on special teams. Where, exactly does he lack talent? Thinking, thinking……
I don't want to put words into anyone's mouth,
so I’m not going to say what I think Arimaris was trying to say, but I get the feeling there is something right under the surface when people talk about Spencer Larsen, or Peyton Hillis, or pretty much any other non-QB white guy in the NFL— race.
It’s not just people on this board, it’s everyone everywhere— especially in the media. Whenever someone says, “he’s a high motor guy”, or “he’s making plays based on pure effort”, they are really saying, “he’s white”. My new favorite is how every white wide reciever is “a Wes Welker type”. If you hear an anylist on TV talking about a white WR in the NFL, or mainly in college, you can’t count to five before the guy says “he’s a Wes Welker type”.
I hope this post doesn’t offend anyone, but it’s been bothering me for so long I felt I had to say something.
by ButteBronco on Mar 12, 2010 10:53 AM MST up reply actions
what I got from reading Arimaris post
Larsen was a 6th round pick. He didn’t have first or second round measureables, and just in general people drafted that late are not expected to make an impact in the NFL. I also gathered that the word “talent” was being used as a way of describing the general perception of Larsen as a football player coming out of college. Then once he was in the league he proved to have talent.
He made some of the most viscious hits i have ever seen on ST:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbUHEBHsC8I
hitting hard is not something that is talent based (although someone with an understanding of physics greater then mine may argue that the speed at which someone runs, given their weight plays more into it then determination), in general it is just wanting it more then someone else and wanting to impose yourself on another person.
He wasn’t a LB starter last year, but maybe he proves that hard work and determination pay off more then natural born “talent”
The black and white comparison is a media thing, I don’t think you will ever hear people like Belicheck or Parcells comparing football players based on skin color as opposed to football players based on the way they play football.
I love rooting for a guy like Larsen, he says all the right things off the field, and he is an underdog story.
by DW76 on Mar 12, 2010 11:13 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
i thought he was blue and orange!
but i get it….. it’s usually right though. Uh Oh, now I’m a reverse racist….
It’s silly really, the fact is there are differences between the races… the fact that we define them as such virtually requires this. It’s when the stereotypes (the rational ones lol) are applied to individuals that we run into problems.
by Whidbey Bronco on Mar 12, 2010 11:17 AM MST up reply actions
ButteBronco
I like your take on Haggan. Didn’t mean to say that I ruled him out as the ILB.
Mostly, I see him as one of 4 quality OLBs on our team (one of the more solid positions on the team IMO) – Dumervil, Haggan, Ayers and Reid. (Still waiting for Moss to wake up and don’t know anything about Atkins)
Moving one inside means we have to find a replacement.
Many people don’t seem to think that either Woodyard or Larsen are the answer.
(By the way, I think DJ will benefit from the larger front.)
I just asked and got that response.
It means that either we move one from OLB, Kelley Braxton or Nick Greisen are possibles, we pick up another FA, or we fill the position in the draft. Moving one from OLB is the least risky, so I agre with you about that.
by ivanthenotsobad on Mar 12, 2010 10:33 AM MST reply actions
I'm a little more optimistic on Woodyard than some
He’s about as versatile as they come. A great tackler, solid on special teams, fast, and one more year of experience under his belt. I think he’s got the intangibles covered too. I’ve heard he’s a leader. Maybe his troubles with coverage had more to do with the lack of pressure from our front 3. At least the guys we have should create some good competition.
THIS IS WHERE SHANNAHAN WENT WRONG
This is where Shannahan went wrong when making decision with his defense in my opinion. Here is why.
1) I know we have Dawkins, but Andra Davis is one of those defensive leaders you can count on and young guys look up to
2) When Shannahan was around he got rid of these “older” guys and went younger and it got us no where
3) Shannahan got rid the likes of Wilson Gold and Lynch when they could have served us a lot better that what we had in return because of LEADERSHIP
Our defense went in the crapper after we let go of defensive leaders like Al Wilson and John Lynch. They were the faces of our defense.
I know Andra Davis isn’t amazing but he brought a lot of intangibles to the table and I don’t think it was a good move in my opinion.
Guys like Bailey, Dummervile, and Williams are not the leader types, great players but they don’t rallly a team when they are down or give any leadership to young players.
And don’t give the last game vs KC as an example of how he faulted because the whole team quit on that game besides jabar gaffney. We weren’t going to the playoffs anyways and weren’t going anywhere in the playoffs if we did.
(3) is not really fair
i loved both wilson and gold, but the former couldn’t play due to his neck and the latter’s performance just fell off a cliff for a whole season. and when lynch was let go, if i recall correctly, he got cut by the pats too.
dropping peterson and his low $ bothers me more than dropping dre. leadership counts for something, but you need contributers. davis wasn’t going to start flying around on ST, so he was a tough use of a roster spot. i’d rather give that spot to larsen and woodyard.
i c your point but wilson was hurt and Lynch was done.
I believe that McX has a plan or they would not have let a guy like Andra go even if it was a courtesy.
by Whidbey Bronco on Mar 12, 2010 11:36 AM MST up reply actions
ya but Did we really give Wilson a chance to see if he could play anymore? And you think Barret was an upgrade over a older lynch? I sure didnt at the time
but Barrett is still around now, and Lynch is out of football (in fact, was out of football the year we dropped him).
So you can say Barrett wasn’t as good then, but that means we would have lost everything he’s done SINCE then, as someone else would’ve picked him up. He also plays special teams, which Lynch didn’t do.
Roster cuts are always a trade-off of vet presence, and longer-term potential. Barrett has played well, and is very young to the point that he still has untapped potential. When Lynch was cut, he was on the complete end of his leash, a complete liability in pass coverage, and it was only going to get worse… to the point that no one else in the league thought he was worth a roster spot either….
Calling cutting Lynch a bad decision ignores the fact that you only get a limited roster, and that keeping players that are liabilities (like Lynch, Davis, etc.) includes the added opportunity cost of NOT keeping the younger guy that might develop into a longer-term solution.
I’m sure that opportunity cost also played into the Davis decision, and indicates some of the other LBs we have at least warrant the further development/camp look that this cut will afford them.
On Wilson - Yes, we did
He failed the physical. His neck would have been a serious medical risk and he was released on that basis, which was the correct move.
As far as Lynch, he refused to come on as a backup, wasn’t good enough to start any longer and because of that, he left. The film on his last season showed that his skills had deteriorated, while Barrett may be developing. NE also had to let him go, so it wasn’t just Denver. You do keep a skilled young player for development, and you do at times have to let the good ones go when they can’t play anymore.
It all starts with the lines
Hmmm...
If Haggan can move inside, then they just cut Davis to give Ayers more playing time and I think that’s a great move.
MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!
Eh Is it just me?
Last year in the draft everybody spoke about how slow Rey Maualuga was and one thing or another, he ended up getting drafted in the second round! The guy looks like a pretty good linebacker to me! This years Rey is Brandon Spikes!
It looks like we’ll have 2 first round draft picks this year (Marshall trade) so lets trade back, gain some extra picks and select Spikes in the late first early 2nd round! The guys a feral tackler and a real leader.
If you don’t agree then maybe Sean Weatherspoon in the mid to late first!
Kirk Morrison has been a Raiders fan all his life! Don’t know if he’d really want to come to Denver!!!
Woodyard is too small for a full time 3-4 linebacker
I have a hunch that Haggan and Larsen will be given a shot at filling the gap.
Should Larsen end up playing mostly at WILB, if Hillis is gone or not cutting it at FB, a massive TE might work as a blocking back. Or Hochstein. I think that they want to fill in house first.
Drafting Spikes certainly could be a possibility. He is ranked at 40 on CBS Sports rankings. I used to think that he wouldn’t work with this defense – I have changed my mind on that. However if our draft order and amount of picks remain at 6, we will probably pick a LB in later rounds.
Sean Weatherspoon is listed as an OLB on the CBS rankings. Is that right, or can he play ILB as well?
Woodyard was a huge tackler in ’08. He seemed to struggle last year. Will be interesting to see what happens to him.
Watching this team reload is very interesting.
In '08, Larsen looked decent when DJ was injured. So did WW, for that matter.
Josh must feel somewhat comfortable with what’s already in house, but I agree there will be a move made in FA, the draft, or both.
As John pointed out, Morrison’s dropoff in performance, last year, might be attributed to playing for Oakland. Environment can have a huge impact. I remember a job I was assigned at a Denver Housing Authority hi rise site. I’d leave my home in good spirits only to have my soul sucked out of me by the pall hanging over the building. It never failed to lower my performance and outlook. The man might be a good fit, here. The inspiration from being freed from the black hole could go a long way in motivating him.
"People who live in glass houses...shouldn't."
How would we get Dobbins as an RFA if we dont have a 5th round pick???
CentSports free 10 cents to bet with Better than Fantasy Football, pick'em!!
LBs as weak if not weaker than the DL
The DL gets blamed for not controlling the line of scrimmage, but in a 3-4 (or 5-2 actually) the DL is supposed to tie up blockers for the LBs to handle. You can’t blame a bad run defense on the DL when most of the players are LBs. The LB play last year was terrible. Davis’ lack of mobility and inability to shake of blockers and play the correct gaps was shocking. Even worse was DJ, who for some reason gets a pass from criticism because he gets so many tackles – from BEHIND! The guy takes the wrong gap all of the time, can’t take blockers on and make a tackle but uses his athleticism (I hate that word) to make enough plays to fool people that he’s a contributor. Larsen is too stiff and slow, and Haggan is a good rotational player but not a starter. The Broncos will draft two pure LBs in the draft and another hybrid LB/DE. Look for them to pick up some tough instinctive players in rounds 2-5.
Hoping that Larsen & WW fill the bill
It will be refreshing to see home grown talent step up, especially holdovers from the Shanahan regime.
I agree, Larsen shouldn’t get any bigger. I am getting tired of his bone crushing hits knocking the pixels off my TV, once they fall to the floor they are very hard to find.

by 

































