Damned if you do, damned if you don't
Kyle Orton and Brady Quinn. It's like being being told "You are going to get punched in the head, but at least you get to pick whether or not it is by an uppercut or a hook." That said, here's hoping that come Week 1, Quinn has begun playing up to some of his potential and is the starter. (I'd also like to point out that I have never been a huge Brady Quinn fan.)
A lot is being made of Orton's year in the system being some insurmountable advantage. I disagree. If all accounts are true, and McD's system takes 2-3 years to learn, why would the Broncos conceivably waste the next 1-2 years waiting to see if Orton can parlay his limited skills into something usable, when a younger QB with equal intelligence and superior physical skills is sitting right behind him? Am I saying that Quinn should be named the starter right now? Absolutely not. However, if Brady Quinn walks in and demonstrates at the very least the same aptitude for the system that Orton did last off-season, then the smart play would be to bite the bullet on last season, hand the reigns to the new QB with with the bigger upside and charge forward.
Is it possible that Quinn has been damaged by his time in Cleveland? More than likely, given that almost no player escapes the Browns with their confidence intact. (Which is still a step up from playing in Oakland, where both your confidence and your dignity are forever stained...) However, almost everything being said about Quinn's stunted development in Cleveland is tracking with what was being said about Orton in Chicago before last season. It stands to reason that if a smart player with marginal skills like Orton can come out of a bad situation, drop into a system he has no experience with and perform to middle-of-the-pack levels his first season, then a smart player with high-grade skills like Quinn can come out of a bad situation, drop into a system he does have experience with and out-perform Orton's first year by leaps and bounds.
Am I suddenly on the Brady Quinn bandwagon? Not yet. But with his ability to move and familiarity with the system, if he impresses during the offseason, I'll be driving the wagon full steam.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sorry.
Not at all convinced Quinn has superior physical skills. In fact, I suspect that we find out, despite all the “noodle” talk, that KO can out-distance BQ. Accuracy seems to go to KO as well, if we look at the NFL years for both. We can wait and see how much of the system BQ absorbed under Mangini (and Weis), but a full year under McD’s version of the system is very likely to be hard to overcome. I honestly believe the only chance BQ has to start this year is if KO is injured or suddenly actually regresses.
Agree
I agree, Quinn won’t start this season unless Orton gets hurt.
by timmaybronco on Mar 15, 2010 10:58 PM MDT up reply actions
Which is unfortunately quite likely seeing Orton’s past injury history and lack of mobility to avoid the pass rush.
In my opinion.
TRUE. Better chance if Quinn is the backup than if it is Simms.
Love your new sig, McG. Choked on my Dr Pepper, actually!
McGeorge
seems to be on a one track mind.
by Topher Doll on Mar 17, 2010 12:24 AM MDT up reply actions
I honestly believe the only chance BQ has to start this year is if KO is injured or suddenly actually regresses.
… and if he beats out brandstater. :-)
Yup...He'll be challenged just to beat out TB
-Stick to the fight when you are hardest hit - it's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
by BroncoSense72 on Mar 16, 2010 7:25 AM MDT up reply actions
Always been hoping TB comes through :-)
and I’m in no hurry to use “drop dead date” strategy. If not this season, maybe next.
I hear you improv and agree to a point.
I like you wasn’t very heavy on Orton at the time of the trade, but as time went along I kind of warmed up to him. I am by no means Manning-Brady hot with him yet and still look at him very closely. What I have come to is a passe sort of with Kyle and that is, I am confident that He is NFL material and fundamentally sound to play quarterback. He also carries himself in a very humble yet sturdy manner with his focus being 100% on his duty. I will give him a pass for last seasons fall from grace with the learning of the system by all of the players. This season will be different and when I say different I mean in terms of how he will be graded. I have a feeling we will see a different kind of play from all of the players and hopefully we’ll all be cheering in Feb for our team. You bet your bippy I’ll be scrutinizing Kyle…
Quinn in wildcat
is it too far fetched to say we got him specifically for this role? his arm is strong and he can move, but his accuracy and and stature are suspect. Why not make him your wildcat (bucking broncos or whatever we call it) qb? he’d be perfect, he still can throw, not like he’s a complete stiff, but his best quality is his ability to put it all together. just thinking.
Wild Horses
Strength and honor
"It's easy to have faith in yourself and have discipline when you're a winner, when you're number one. What you've got to have is faith and discipline when you're not yet a winner." -Vince lombarti
by kybroncomaniac on Mar 16, 2010 1:21 AM MDT up reply actions
LOL Quinn and Ortons situations are nothing alike . Thats the problem here not Quinn himself but the people who keep creating comparisons .
Orton had already threw for 2900 yards and 18 tds in 15 games before he showed up.
Marginal skills ? hilarious
not Ortons year ………..Ortons CAREER !!!!!!!!!!!
There is nothing wrong with Quinn but he hasnt done anything in his nfl career for people to be sniffing his butt like that that he can strike fear in anyone .
People ragged on Orton because he didnt have the big stats but they knew he could manage a game and that a team could win with him . Right now anyone who claims they think we can win with Quinn based on what he has done with Cleveland deserves to be smacked .
Now this is not a claim that Quinn cant get better but geez its been one day and quite a few of you are hitching your horses to his wagon for no other reason than that hes not Kyle Orton .
by Hoopforia on Mar 16, 2010 12:46 AM MDT reply actions 2 recs
like JC all over again
Because Montana has no professional sports, I gotta support the land of my birth.
Socrates was once executed for 'trolling'.
^Needs explaining: don't call someone asking uncomfortable, slightly antagonistic questions trolls. In all odds they probably just want to learn. It's real easy to differentiate a 'Socratic' post from a trolling one (unless you're a resident of WCG).
^Needs further explaining: I have yet to post anything on WCG, don't worry, I'm not trying to rationalize anything I've done. I've just lurked over there and man, they are the model of post-peloponnesian war Athens.
Rec'd. Well said Hoop.
"I have no right, by anything I do or say, to demean a human being in his own eyes. What matters is not what I think of him; it is what he thinks of himself." - Antoine de Exupery
by Alexander Wall on Mar 16, 2010 9:56 PM MDT up reply actions
May we all be damned
for even wanting to believe that there may be a better QB out there… We will all know at the start of the year, we will all know our coach wants to lead our team. We have three QB’s trying to be the one, who cares which one it is as long it is the best one that can and will lead our team.
They are all Bronco’s, so lets wait and see which one does best. I don’t believe we should all be damned because we may like the idea of a better QB.
If Brady or Brad happened to be the leader this year because of ability is that a bad thing?
So, I am going to hitch my horses to which ever QB can take us to the top again and I will leave all the butt sniffing to the ones that don’t like any other possibilities…. Let the best man lead…
I'll ride shotgun..
on the stage you hook your horses to. I agree with you 100%. They are all Broncos, and therefore have my vote. the great general (George S. Patton) once said “Lead, Follow, or get out of the way”. I’ll hook up to the one who leads us (whom ever it is), and should he fall, I’ll hook up to the one who steps up. And remember……Go Broncos!
Strength and honor
"It's easy to have faith in yourself and have discipline when you're a winner, when you're number one. What you've got to have is faith and discipline when you're not yet a winner." -Vince lombarti
by kybroncomaniac on Mar 16, 2010 1:26 AM MDT up reply actions
STARTER ???
improv88; Sorry but it will take Brady Quinn has first year just to re-learn the Patriots system by the coach who made it possible for both Tom Brady & Matt Cassell to be so successful. Both sat on the pine and learned at least 1-year for Brady who was pressed into start for an injured Bloesoe and never gave up the position. Matt Cassell sat for 3 or 4 years and learn the system and stepped right in and winning after 3-years.
I look for Brady Quinn to do the same sit, watch, and learn his first year. I do agree with you that Quinn has the potential to be the starter over time. But, I also believe Orton will come out with both guns blazing next season and lead Broncos to their first playoffs in 6 years. Bottom line Broncos have 2-quality QB’s to develop and potential for a third in Brandstater or through the next draft, you can see McD is building a solid team to win now and building for the future. It’s great to see what’s happening in Denver! Go Broncos!
oc60
I've been on the Brady Quinn as a Bronco bandwagon since the idea was flirted with before the start of the 2009 season.
That being said, I’m not about to jump the gun and declare him the future starter over Orton. He’s got a long way to go. Everybody that tries to argue Quinn’s case as the “better QB” who’s going to win-out the job before pre-season starts always forgets one major aspect to being the starting QB.
That aspect is Team respect and Chemistry. Even if Quinn ends up having more mobility, accuracy, range, and learns the system better than KO (which he will need to do ALL of those before its even considered), Quinn will still have to earn the respect of his teamates and create some good chemistry.
I don’t know about the rest of you, but from the way I saw Kyle interacting with his teamates on the sidelines all year (especially when they were losing) I saw a ton of respect, and they were attentive to what he was saying. Kyle has their respect, and they appear to like him holding the reigns. Its going to take more than just being statistically better to steal Orton’s job.
"I have no right, by anything I do or say, to demean a human being in his own eyes. What matters is not what I think of him; it is what he thinks of himself." - Antoine de Exupery
by Alexander Wall on Mar 16, 2010 4:25 AM MDT reply actions 9 recs
Yep. My thoughts exactly.
Comparing Michael Lombardi to Bill Williamson is like comparing an In-N-Out Cheeseburger to a sh## sandwich.
Williamson would probably eat both – no questions asked.
You're right, Marine
It’s also going to take a lot of improvement for him to just catch Orton in terms of stats, accuracy and knowledge of the game. I wish him well, but he’s a long way from there.
It all starts with the lines
Rec'd Your Comment
Good points. If Orton receives a long term deal we will know he is the starter (much to the dislike of the Orton haters). If he doesn’t and plays on the 1 year tender offered him the we will know he is gone next year. Me IMO I think he gets a 3 year deal sometime this year.
I definitely agree on most of what you said.
Orton is playing what we’d call a “contract year” thanks to the unsigned CBA. If it weren’t for that McD would have had a harder decision. He’d have had to declare an official opinion on Orton prematurely. With the extra year of a tender, McDaniels gets one more year to let him grow and make a good call.
I agree with you here papa, Orton will either get a long-term deal signed this year (either as the starter or as a backup to Brandstater/Quinn) or he will likely go somewhere else; but I would argue that he the deal might not happen until the end of pre-season, at the earliest.
With Quinn familiar in the system, and Brandstater getting two years of it now, I don’t see us retaining Orton over the younger two guys (granted they are progressing well) when we pursue our next QB – which we definitely should be doing the moment we are sure Orton isn’t a long term answer. This is Orton’s contract year. He’s either going to prove he deserves a long term deal with the Broncos, or that he’s just not the right fit for us.
The one kink in this opinion is that Orton being the most experience veteran of the QBs on our roster will be retained at a cheap price as our permanent back-up (which I could definitely see Orton doing). He’s definitely got that unselfish mentality, heck he filled in behind Grossmen for a couple years in a situation many guys would be trying to get traded out of. Now he’s playing for a team that is confident in him, and wants him. It could very well be that we retain Orton regardless of whether he’s a long-term starter or not. i don’t know about the rest of you, but even if Quinn or Brandstater develops better this year… I would still want Orton on the roster. We all know he’s tough and can at least manage our team in the event of an injury to the starter.
Think of it this way. How would our 1998 season have looked if it wasn’t for Bubby Brister? Yeah he wasn’t spectacular, but he filled in for Elway and played just good enough for the team to carry him through until Elway was ready again. If it wasn’t for Brister’s competancy (much like Orton) than I doubt TD ever would have reached 2,000 yards that year. You can’t run the ball a lot when you’re playing from behind, and that’s a fact. Bubby managed the passing game enough so that we could run over our opponents and stay undefeated. Just a little nugget to think about.
"I have no right, by anything I do or say, to demean a human being in his own eyes. What matters is not what I think of him; it is what he thinks of himself." - Antoine de Exupery
by Alexander Wall on Mar 16, 2010 9:28 PM MDT up reply actions
Orton will NOT stay as a backup
The guy threw for 3800 yards last year. He is a legitimate NFL starter, and only 27 (28?) years old.
My guess is he will not sign a long-term deal at the price we’d be willing to give him, because as a UFA he’d be an 7+ mill QB for 5+ teams in the league. We can keep him on a 1-year tender deal, but at that point we’ll either need to put up and pay him like a starter, or he’ll go elsewhere for a QB-needy team that will do so.
He may not be a HOFer, but he is much better than a journeyman backup…. he’s a top-20 NFL QB, and if you don’t think so, I’d say you haven’t been watching enough games to understand the QB-suckitude that exists out there.
Most teams don’t have Mannings/Brady/Brees….
This post is funny.
A big part of what made Orton and Cutler successful passers in Denver was having an elite WR like Marshall.
If we trade Marshall, I am quite certain you will see Orton take a step back at QB (unless we can replace Marshall with a similar talent). IMO, that similar talent is not currently on the roster. Not even close. Maybe that player is in the draft or on another roster. That player is not available as an UFA.
In my opinion.
minus the pick-sixes, Orton's best game was against the chiefs...
with no BM
I do agree with you to an extent, though
Because Montana has no professional sports, I gotta support the land of my birth.
Socrates was once executed for 'trolling'.
^Needs explaining: don't call someone asking uncomfortable, slightly antagonistic questions trolls. In all odds they probably just want to learn. It's real easy to differentiate a 'Socratic' post from a trolling one (unless you're a resident of WCG).
^Needs further explaining: I have yet to post anything on WCG, don't worry, I'm not trying to rationalize anything I've done. I've just lurked over there and man, they are the model of post-peloponnesian war Athens.
Thats funny...
“If you take away the 14 points that he handed the other team…it was an AWESOME game!”
Sadly, true.
What? Orton was awful vs the Chefs. Gaffney had a good game and so did Moreno, but Orton’s accuracy was terrible. His two INTs for TDs were bad misfires and absolute killers.
Orton alone was a primary reason we got smoked in that game.
In my opinion.
Tell me one more time...
How many points KC’s defense scored, and then tell me again how many their offense scored that game? If I remember correctly there was 9 points in field goals alone, add the extra points from the 3 TD’s the offense scored and that’s already 12 points for KC’s kicker alone, not to mention the 18 points scored by the rest of their offense. You say that Orton throwing two picks for 12 points blew us that game. How does your logic work?
The score was freaking 44-24. Even if you take off almost THREE touchdowns, 20 points (Orton only gave up 14 points total) the score would still have been 24-24. How in the world just Orton throwing 14 points to the other team lose it for us? Last time I checked 30 was still more than 24. Ridiculous.
"I have no right, by anything I do or say, to demean a human being in his own eyes. What matters is not what I think of him; it is what he thinks of himself." - Antoine de Exupery
by Alexander Wall on Mar 16, 2010 9:50 PM MDT up reply actions
It's that Fantasy-Football Rage you've got. Blinding you from processing basic mathmatical calculations.
"I have no right, by anything I do or say, to demean a human being in his own eyes. What matters is not what I think of him; it is what he thinks of himself." - Antoine de Exupery
by Alexander Wall on Mar 16, 2010 9:52 PM MDT up reply actions
Ah McGeorge
You can blame the picks on him, which I would only call one his, but the 14 points weren’t his fault. Also giving up that many rushing yards would be a much bigger factor, a swiss cheese defense is a huge reason we lost that game. Sorry, not sure where you are getting you ideas from. Oh wait they are just you opinion.
by Topher Doll on Mar 17, 2010 12:30 AM MDT up reply actions
McGeorge
That’s a great theory, but why did our passing game do just find when Marshall was on the bench at the end of the season? Gaffney stepped in and carried the load just fine. Our defense handed away WAY too many points that game, it wasn’t all Orton’s fault as you are implying here.
You sound a little too consumed by the fantasy-football fad that has been stirring up the NFL fanbases nationwide. It’s not about the superstars. Yeah they are great, they can make big plays, but it takes a whole team to win. Sometimes when you have a whole team of nobody’s, they are incredibily difficult to scheme against. The Patriots proved that you can be a consistent contender without a superstar. Their defense and offense both was frequently fitted with starting rookies and aging veterans aquired cheap and late. You can’t even say it was all about Brady because he went down in 2008 and Matt Cassel played phenominally as far as backup QBs go.
The new and popular argument right now is: System vs. Superstar. And so far, System as been dominating the decade. Look at all the Superbowl teams of the last decade and tell me how many were superstar reliant. The saints? No, they played with a bunch of aging vets, what-his-name recievers, a QB that everyone said was too-short and couldn’t hack it as a starter, etc. The Colts? Again the system. The colts have the luxury of a superstar running their system, Peyton Manning. The Steelers? System again. Even Elway never won a superbowl until he was in the right system and had a great running game behind him.
Your argument has just no evidence to support it. Look at the Bengals with Carson Palmer, Ochocinco, and Larry Johnson last year. Tell me how they did.
"I have no right, by anything I do or say, to demean a human being in his own eyes. What matters is not what I think of him; it is what he thinks of himself." - Antoine de Exupery
by Alexander Wall on Mar 16, 2010 9:41 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec that
We have the people to keep going with our receivers, and this next season should go even better for the passing game, so the next time Orton passes for over 400 yards, McGeorge, won’t be able to complain.
by Topher Doll on Mar 17, 2010 12:32 AM MDT up reply actions
My biggest problem with Orton is that he is injury prone. He was injured in 2008 with the Bears (ankle) and injured twice (finger and ankle) in 2009 with Denver. The guy is really tough, no doubt about it. But he doesn’t play as well when he is playing hurt or injured.
His lack of mobility will always put him in harm’s way and subject him to hits other QBs avoid due to possessing superior athletic skills.
Having a good alternative QB is a very wise move for Denver seeing as Orton has proven to be more injury prone that most NFL starting QBs.
In my opinion.
Speaking of injuries......
Where did that Cassell guy come from anyways? OH YEA!!! a BRADY INJURY HAHAHAHAHA
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
Yep
And while great in NE, he didn’t live up to that big contract in KC.
by Topher Doll on Mar 17, 2010 12:33 AM MDT up reply actions
Not sure this quote is completely fair:
My biggest problem with Orton is that he is injury prone
The film of his 2008 injury and his two 2009 injuries don’t appear to support the contention:
His lack of mobility will always put him in harm’s way and subject him to hits other QBs avoid
If you look at the film (available in game highlights on NFL.com):
2008 – Chi vs Det; In this play, Orton dropped about 10 yards deep, his left guard totally whiffed on a block and allowed the DT to charge Orton. Orton ducked away from the tackle and took off running. He sidestepped a 2nd defender who had broken past the line. Orton was able to get back to the line of scrimmage, and was headed for the sideline, due to another unblocked defender being in front of him. He was hit from behind just before going out of bounds. As he fell, the defender who had been in front of him also hit the pile. According to the announcers, Orton’s cleats caught in that 2nd defender’s pants, twisting the ankle.
2009 – Den vs Chi Orton had dropped back, had reasonable protection, though the RT was being pushed back towards him. Orton threw the ball, and as he followed through on his throw, his finger was struck and bent backwards by the outstretched hand of the DE.
2009 – Den vs Was On a 3rd & goal from the Was 10, Orton dropped back 8 yards to pass. In the replay, the announcers commented on the great coverage by Washington. As the pocket collapsed, Orton stepped forward, then took off running for the end zone. Just prior to reaching the line of scrimmage, Orton pumped faked to freeze the unblocked defender in front of him. Two yards past the LOS, Orton was hit from behind by a defender who slid down Orton’s legs and landed first on his right ankle, then bounced onto Orton’s left ankle.
Just something to consider
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Mar 16, 2010 2:37 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nice replay.
Although KO has a somewhat overstated reputation for immobility, he does earn some if it. IMO, it’s due to his “running” style. He takes very short steps, and is almost up on his toes—reminds me of how P Manning moves, and how J Unitas moved. Both lack(or lacked) the escapability of our #7 even in the second half of his carreer, but both make (or made) it work quite well, and neither are not considered injury-prone. From an alternate viewpoint; Elway had great escapability……sure didn’t keep his knees from getting multiple surgeries.
Good point
I didn’t really bother looking at his running mechanics.
McDaniels did say in an interview that he expects Orton to work on his overall mobility and strength during this off season.
It will be interesting to see if Orton can improve in these areas, and how well he is able to absorb the next level of the offensive system.
I’ll also be interested in seeing how Quinn comes along. I think having Quinn will push Orton to improve, if he wants to keep his starting position.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Mar 16, 2010 3:22 PM MDT up reply actions
Lol, nice.
"I have no right, by anything I do or say, to demean a human being in his own eyes. What matters is not what I think of him; it is what he thinks of himself." - Antoine de Exupery
by Alexander Wall on Mar 16, 2010 9:43 PM MDT up reply actions
Agreed
Everyone makes it out that Orton will be retiring soon or that he is on the down hill.
by Topher Doll on Mar 17, 2010 12:34 AM MDT up reply actions

by 





























