The Tim Tebow Conundrum - Broncos should avoid the temptation
Ok, let me get something out of the way right off the bat. I'm not here to bash Tim Tebow. Far from it. For some reason, as often happens with polarizing topics, you are forced to pick sides. I'm not picking sides here. There is little doubt about the character of Tebow and yes that matters in the NFL. There are plenty of examples, starting with a team that wears Black and Gold.
We also know that no player in this draft will work harder than Tebow. He will be the first one in and last one out of the building every day. So was Chris Simms, by the way, but I digress. Tebow is a coaches dream. Especially Josh McDaniels. Tebow wants to be coached, wants to be yelled at, wants to learn, wants to be great. In a lot of ways, that is half the battle in any walk of life.
Tebow has all the intangibles you'd love to see in every player.
There is also no debating his place as one of the greatest college football players....ever. He won championships, he won Heisman Trophies. He was a great leader and a great teammate. He played hurt and came back from injury in a hurry. Again, not much to debate here and all great qualities in a player - especially at quarterback.
So why is there a pit in my stomach every time I think of a guy who became a star in Blue and Orange on Saturday's wearing Blue and Orange on Sunday's?
Like all the positives above, I think we can all agree Tebow is not ready to come in and start. Not a terrible thing, few rookie quarterbacks are. Even fewer are really given the chance. But there in-lies the problem.
If the Broncos were to take Tebow in the 2nd Round - at 43 or 45 - or worse, trade back into the late-1st Round to take him, they would do so with the intention of finding a way to get a tremendous athlete on the field. At least that has been the argument for the Broncos, a team with needs all over the roster, to take him so high in the Draft.
That is a relative term, by the way. I think Tebow could get drafted anywhere from 25-45. What is considered 'high' or a 'reach' for the Broncos is not for a team like, say, the Vikings or Patriots. They are contending football teams that can put a guy like Tebow on their roster and nurture him until he is ready - and still be in Super Bowl contention.
Back to the Broncos. Let's say they do use Tebow as many have mentioned - as a weapon in some gimmick offense. I've heard Tebow could be used as a 'Slash-type' player or even a H-Back. How about the Wild Horses/Wildcat/whatevertheycallitnext You name it, we've heard it - short-yardage, goalline, special-teams. That's all great, and it might work - a bit.
Here's the problem. If we already agree that Tebow needs work, and we all agree that it will take time, how is Tebow going to work on the things he needs to work on if he is focusing his attention on a gimmick offense or a position other than quarterback? It defeats the very purpose of drafting this guy - and goes against what Tebow himself wants, which is to be a quarterback in the NFL.
Sure, do I think Josh McDaniels could work with Tebow and make him a great Quarterback in the NFL? Definitely. Here is the problem - McDaniels isn't a quarterback coach anymore, and he isn't an Offensive Coordinator anymore. He is the Head Coach of the Broncos and is responsible for all positions on the football field, not just the QB. I saw firsthand in Training Camp last year that he is heavily involved with all positions, too - from running WR drills, to coaching linebackers, to sitting in on defensive-line drills.
I am a Tim Tebow supporter. Because of that, I feel the best thing for Tim Tebow is to NOT be drafted by the Broncos. If anything, it would stunt his development as a quarterback and slow his progress. The most importtant element for Tebow is to be drafted into the right situation - a team that has the flexibility to be patient with his development and let him cook in the oven a bit more.
The Broncos are not that team. It is a team and fan-base in the midst of its' longest playoff drought since before the Orange-Crush defense. It is a team that has seen the Head Coach, Quarterback and star receiver jettisoned in the past 16 months after 15 years of stability. In other words, the Broncos need to add players that can help right now, today. They need players that can step right in and be big-time contributors. Tim Tebow cannot do that for the Broncos in 2010. Not in the way that would benefit Tebow in 2011 and beyond.
In another year, in another time, Tebow would be a solid pickup. For this Broncos team, in 2010, the best bet is to let Tebow land softly somewhere else and go about the business of rebuilding this roster.
230 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I definitely agree with your analysis
But the one thing I would say is that Denver is the best place for Tebow himself. A legit QB coach, a solid starting QB in place but no certain franchise quarterback (i.e. opportunity to move up) and a francise that would value his character and flexibility more than anyone else. There would be tons of pressure on him in Jacksonville (kind of like there was on Quinn in Cleveland).
There’s no question that Tebow should hope that the Broncos pick him. I just don’t think the Broncos want him enough to warrant a 2nd round pick when guys like Arrelious Benn will be there to fix both an immediate and a long term need. Honestly, Josh McDaniels thinks that he can win the Super Bowl this year, and picking Tim Tebow is not the route to go if you want to win the Super Bowl this year.
If we do pick him though, I’ll trust McD that it was the correct choice. But at this junction, I don’t think it’s likely.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 8:20 PM MDT reply actions
I think the pressure...
is going to be there because Broncos fans are sick of losing. The first INT Orton/Quinn throws, people will be screaming for Tebow…I think the best spot for him is a team that is going to select him, put him on the shelf for a year, and let him study/learn
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
by John Bena on Apr 21, 2010 8:22 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
That is going to be true pretty much anywhere he goes.
The only team with a franchise QB that has been rumored to be interested is the Patriots.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 8:27 PM MDT up reply actions
Not a team that is a SB contender this year...
Minnesota is an option, as are several teams at the end of the 1st Round, New England being one of them…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Yeah Minnesota or NE do make sense
The only thing that we do know is that anything can happen though.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 8:34 PM MDT up reply actions
Minnesota? Only if Favre comes back
You think that if Sage/Tarvaris situation is any different than Quinn/Orton? Might even be MORE pressure up in Minnesota!
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
That situation is already in place with Quinn/Orton
3 doesn’t make it worse or better.
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Apr 21, 2010 9:49 PM MDT up reply actions
Maybe late 2nd if he's there and we have extra picks from trading down, maybe...
I too dabbled in pacifism once...
by waltersobchakbronco on Apr 21, 2010 8:20 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
agreed walter
we just have to many things we need to address and we shouldnt be taking a risk on a guy like this…..coming from a UF fan
"ITS PARTAAY TIME BAABY"
Great post
I agree that we have needs that need fixed. If we had the all pieces in place, I wouldn’t mind Tebow in the mid 2nd round, but just not this draft.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Completely Disagree
He really only has mechanic issues but he has all the physical tools to play QB in the NFL. He can make all the throws and he does not throw the ball like a punt. He will be the first player in the building and the last player to leave and he will work his arse off to improve. People that do not see this are insane. The only thing that needs fixing is his mechanics which a coach like McDaniels can fix. Is he worth a 1st round pick, probably not but it could happen if we trade back. He is definitely worth the 43 pick
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 9:12 PM MDT up reply actions
Agreed but from what I heard today in NYC
He wont be there past the first round. I hope I am wrong
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Apr 21, 2010 9:54 PM MDT up reply actions
The Scheme may inflate his
numbers a bit. But the scheme did not make him the 3rd leading passer in SEC history. He superior talent as a QB did that for him. You could say that Bradfords and McCoys numbers were highly inflated by their schemes also. The scheme argument is not a very good one
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 9:30 PM MDT up reply actions
Great argument, completely agree
Also, no one has talked about the fact that on the way to Jacksonville for a private workout with Tebow, McD stopped off for a private workout with McCoy (my personal choice. I know, homer). Peter King also has McCoy going to us with number 43
by TXBroncoFan on Apr 21, 2010 8:25 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I would rather
See if the qbs we have can develop more
by Pmoreno95 on Apr 21, 2010 9:12 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
So do I
Or pick a QB in round 6 or 7, but out of the 2 I would pick McCoy
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:38 PM MDT up reply actions
not in the first/2nd, if he drops to the third then definately
i would even be okay with a trade up to get him in the third but…we have 3 good QBs in orton, quinn and brandstater…as good as tebow is/could be we dont’ need him and we’re better off using our picks to get the other talents in the draft
Who am I to question McX's judgement?
If they feel Tebow is the broncos answer for the next 10 or more years then I am on board…Besides….Sayre persauded me. LOL
That is the conundrum
What it comes down to is whether it is better to build the team, then add the QB, or get a QB and try to build a team around him. It also leads into the question of why so many promising QBs who had great careers in college are a bust in the pros.
Most of the top QBs coming out in any given year go to a team at the bottom of the league, like Stafford last year, and struggle because they don’t have the pieces around them to be successful. For many, they are not used to struggling, and losing, and getting booed, because they were winners until they reached the pros. Most teams, like the Rams this year, seem to think that it is best to draft the hotshot QB, then try to build the team around them. The problem is, by the time they build a team they have ruined their QB. David Carr is a good example. He was highly thought of coming out of college, but at Houston he was destroyed. By the time Houston had become a decent team, he was ruined.
While I don’t put our team in the same position as Detroit or the Rams this year, we are obviously in a rebuilding phase. We have substantial weaknesses that must be addressed on both sides of the ball before we will be a serious competitor again REGARDLESS OF WHO IS TAKING THE SNAPS. Peyton Manning could not make us a great team right now, so why waste a high pick on a QB?
Right now, Orton is the best choice. He is smart, efficient, and protects the ball. Behind him, we have Quinn, who some still think has a chance to be good, and a project in Brandstater, who might be good in another year or two. What we need to do to improve as a team is continue to improve on defense, and fix our anemic running game by rebuilding our O-Line. If we make good choices in our draft and in free agency, in another year or two we could be pretty good again. Even by next year, we will know whether any of our current QBs is up to the job. If not, then, with a credible team already assembled, it will be time to look for our QB of the future.
by ITPro on Apr 21, 2010 8:35 PM MDT reply actions 2 recs
Hey...
A Zips reference! Fear the Roo!!!
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Stop it.
McDaniels is clearly a fan of Tebow, but, I’m with the the mind he has big plans for Quinn. If he does select Tebow I think it’ll be some sort of QB wild card considering depth at the position.
by Bentley.Ketchum on Apr 21, 2010 8:36 PM MDT reply actions
Like the Seahawks
By bringing in a FA QB, it should put most QB thoughts out of our heads. Over at the Seattle page they feel that way, but we haven’t caught on yet.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
You had me at hello =)
In other words, the Broncos need to add players that can help right now, today. They need players that can step right in and be big-time contributors.
I must confess, I’m OK with The Tebow at #45, assuming two immediate needs have already been filled. Even at that, I share your concerns about the looming QB controversy that would undoubtedly ensue (sooner rather than later). I also agree that taking up Tebow’s training time to learn gimicks would be of dis-service to both him and to us. Solid article, John. Very much Rec’d and agreed.
Give me impact at center, copmetence at guard and an upgrade at linebacker - sprinkle in strides from having the same system for two years in a row - and I'll show you a contender!
Completely Disagree
I think people are letting their character fascination with Tebow overlook his limited physical skill set. Nobody wants to read the story that the good guy finished last. But it’s true; Tebow has no future in the NFL.
The best way to describe Tebow is to use the current in-phrase and say he has been coached to his ceiling. Trite, but in this case 100% true. This talk about baking in the oven is basically akin to saying let the media circus die down and then he can fade away quietly.
My own hope is that he goes to Jacksonville. That way he gets a nice big fat contact. He’ll implode there but at least he’ll walk away with the cold hard cash and the Jags will make a nice bit o’ money on their circus freak.
Drafting him anywhere else is just leading the poor fool on.
by Tuttifrutti on Apr 21, 2010 8:38 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
What do you disagree with??
I am saying NOT to draft him…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
You're wrong!
Don’t draft him!!
That rug really tied the room together...
by Streams Of Whiskey on Apr 21, 2010 9:36 PM MDT up reply actions
No, DON"T draft him!
"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" -- Wimpy J. Wellington
by Broncs Cheer on Apr 21, 2010 11:22 PM MDT up reply actions
McDaniels needs to start turning the ship around this year
That is why we can’t/won’t draft Tebow.
Again our top needs are
Center
ILB
G
WR
Plenty of safe picks out there. Hopefully we can trade back a couple of spots in round 1
"3 and Out Baby" I ride the short bus!
Fill these needs
And if Tebow is still there, feel free to draft him.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
All this talk about Tebow's problems
seem to conveniently neglect the fact that his release is just as fast as anyone else’s now, and his footwork is insane, especially compared to anyone we currently have as a quarterback. I’m not a Pro-Tebow guy through and through, but I think the guy has the necessary skills to succeed in the NFL. Anyone who doesn’t think Tebow has the arm for it has never seen Montana or Brady play. Both of those guys were said to have “less than stellar” arm strength, and I think that worked out juuuust fine. Tebow’s going to be a system quarterback no doubt about it. I think one of the only systems that lend themselves to him being the quarterback is here in Denver. If ANYONE can make Tebow a bona fide NFL quarterback, it’s Josh McDaniels. That’s all I can say about it.
Comparing Michael Lombardi to Bill Williamson is like comparing an In-N-Out Cheeseburger to a sh## sandwich.
Williamson would probably eat both – no questions asked.
John
Yes, and I agree with that as my comment implies. I just disagree that he has any future in the NFL. Can we stop pretending on that point. Fawning over some to protect them from the harsh truth isn’t being fair and balanced, as someone else wrote. It’s leading some one on.
why is it all of a sudden the "truth" that he won't be good in the NFL?
Are you the all-knowing? Get out of here. I bet no one thought Tony Romo would be worth anything, and he’s turned out alright, all things considered. I bet everyone in Cleveland thought Tim Couch would be the lord and savior of the Browns’ golden days, but he wasn’t.
Nothing is certain the NFL, stop acting like Tebow is guaranteed to fail. He’s not.
Comparing Michael Lombardi to Bill Williamson is like comparing an In-N-Out Cheeseburger to a sh## sandwich.
Williamson would probably eat both – no questions asked.
I agree with Joe
There’s been more than enough guys succeed with a lot less than tebow has going for him. Romo, Brees was a 2nd rounder, brady, jake delhomme jeff garcia warren moon all these guys had more questions against them and turned out great.
by Warren Todd on Apr 21, 2010 8:53 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Yea and for every one of those guys you mentioned
There’s a thousand bagging groceries. Don’t get me wrong I love me a QB project, but not in the 2nd round
Kurt Warner reference?
Doesn’t really support your argument.
by OC Bronco Fan on Apr 22, 2010 12:02 AM MDT up reply actions
Grow Up
The draft is based upon the best available information you have at the time. Is it perfect? Hell no. But you make decisions based upon fact and not idle speculation. If you want McD to spin the big wheel in the sky and hope you that a miracle happens that’s up to you. I don’t know that Tebow will fail in the NFL. But any honest evaluation by an NFL scout will tell you that the odds are slim.
Winning teams make smart choices and Tebow is not a smart choice for any team other than the Jags.
any honest evaluation
Told you jamarcus russell was worthy of the number one overall pick
And matt leinert
And alkali smith
And that ryan leaf was more pro ready and more responsible than peyton manning
And that tony romo had no future in the nfl and would be lucky to make a practice squad
That tom brady was a project quarterback who couldn’t make all the nfl throws
That alex smith could make the transistion to a pro style offense
That drew brees couldn’t.
Kyle orton took 90% of his snaps in shotgun at purdue
The thing is… you don’t know. I don’t know. The best scouts coaches and gm’s don’t know. No one really knows what’s gonna happen as players go from college to the nfl. Its fun to speculate. But its gotta be fun. You make it a personal attack on people who never said that they KNOW tebow will do good. I know you said you don’t know either.. but don’t be a jackass about it
by Warren Todd on Apr 21, 2010 9:19 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions 11 recs
Wonderful points
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:39 PM MDT up reply actions
Time out Tutti,
You make decisions based upon fact and not idle speculation.
That’s the point. There is no “fact” in this equation. For every statistic you cite, someone else can cite an opposing stat. It’s ALL speculation, including the evaluations of NFL scouts…
I happen to agree that Tebow won’t make a top-shelf NFL QB, but it’s not a sure thing.
"I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today" -- Wimpy J. Wellington
by Broncs Cheer on Apr 21, 2010 11:30 PM MDT up reply actions
For the record
Im not saying he will surely suck in the NFL. I do think he will. HAHA But my point is he’s a project QB and a waste of a pick, that we cannot afford to waste. Thats all
I respectfully disagree.
Getting on the field in a Wild Horses position is just what will get him the experience he needs. Slowly. Throwing him on the field like Oakland or Cleveland or Buffalo or Jacksonville would do would be exactly what he doesn’t need. Sitting on the bench in New England isn’t what he needs either.
I been on both sides with him, but I wouldn’t be upset if we drafted him this week…
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
So you think...
playing a gimmick offense will prepare him to play QB in the NFL?? He essentially played a gimmick offense at Florida – the true spread – an offense that no one will ever play in the NFL because defenses are too fast – yes, even faster than the SEC.
Again, my position on gimmick football is well known. It might work – for awhile – but when push comes to shove, against top-notch defensive minds and talent, you had better know how to play football….
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
see Miami Dolphins, 2008 and 2009.
Comparing Michael Lombardi to Bill Williamson is like comparing an In-N-Out Cheeseburger to a sh## sandwich.
Williamson would probably eat both – no questions asked.
The Wildcat
Is not what made the Phins great, it helped, but look at Pat White, huge failure there, waste of a pick on a player who was chosen for the same reason.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 8:51 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
two different people
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Apr 21, 2010 9:57 PM MDT up reply actions
Not really
Pat White was brought in to learn the Wildcat and run it. Well that hasn’t really turned out well, maybe in 2-3 seasons yes, but not anytime soon.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:41 PM MDT up reply actions
See what?
A playoff loss followed by no playoffs? Yea, they got in, faced a real defense in Baltimore, and got stuffed. Hell, even the Broncos stuffed the Dolphins BS Wildcat in ‘08. It was Cutler pick-6’s that killed the Broncos that day…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
THat's what I'm saying John.
Gimmick style play does nothing in the long term except create problems.
Comparing Michael Lombardi to Bill Williamson is like comparing an In-N-Out Cheeseburger to a sh## sandwich.
Williamson would probably eat both – no questions asked.
There's a difference between Maimi playing wildcat and anyone else
They bought into it 100%. It was their offense for the most part and therefore wasn’t a gimmick for them.
by Timimus on Apr 21, 2010 9:13 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Situational...I have no desire to see the Broncos become the Dolphins.
Tebow would bring an added dimension to the offense.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
by Tim Lynch on Apr 21, 2010 11:40 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
And the poll shows a resounding..... maybe.
I’ve said it yesterday and I’ll say it again. I don’t know how I feel about Tebow. I like him one day and I hate him the next. The more we talk about it, the more conflicted I feel. On one hand, he’s a great collegiate athlete and holds about every record in the NCAA. On the other hand, we have glaring needs at a million other positions and it would be muy loco to draft a guy in the second round who would likely be third on the depth chart for the forseeable future. On one hand, he’s a great leader. On the other hand, he’s a polarizing figure that causes controversy (not negative controversy…. just controversy, which is why there have been 45 posts devoted to the guy on this site, alone).
Frankly, I don’t know. There are plenty of picks that I’d be happy with in the second round. I’m not going to sit here and say that we shouldn’t take Tebow, but I’m not going to be driving the bandwagon, either.
On Saturday, can we just put this discussion to bed? I know it’s a lot to ask for and I probably won’t get everyone’s attention, but I just have this gut feeling that we are going to get 15+ posts on saturday evening about Tebow. If we don’t take him, we’ll get a bunch of “BOOOOO” posts with “WOOOO” comments. If we do take him, we’ll get a bunch of “WOOOO” posts with a bunch of “Booooooo” comments.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
Tebow could be a great player.
Tebow could be a great player or he could turn out to be a not so great player. John, you are posting blogs with a great deal of bias. I have a a lot of respect for this site because most of the posted blogs are well thought out. You lost creditability when you brought up Chris Simms. Chris was not the player in college that Tebow was. If you are going to make an argument to not draft Tebow, then show some numbers! I feel that your blogs lack depth (i.e., when you stated that Tebow could not help “right now”. Do you have a crystal ball John?). If you want to write blogs like this, go to the DenverBroncos.com site please.
Did you just join right now
To bash this post?
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Huh??
First, this, like you said, is a blog – and it is filled with opinions…I didn’t know there were many people that thought Tebow could start Day 1. Maybe he could. In my opinion he cannot, and employing him in any other way than to prepare him as a starting QB would be a disservice to him – even if it helped the Broncos.
That is the conundrum…
Disagree with me, that’s cool, but back up my opinion with numbers?? It’s the NFL Draft, it’s all conjecture!
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Somebody please yell LAST CALL!
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Apr 21, 2010 9:59 PM MDT up reply actions
The irony is...you own MHR.
You can say whatever the hell you want. lol No need to go to denverbroncos.com.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
Whatever, dude.
John isn’t a syndicated journalist, he’s a passionate Denver Broncos fan who spends a good deal of his time keeping this place churning and burning. If he feels like dropping an opinion every once in a while, so friggin’ be it.
Either way, his evaluation was spot on, and he doesn’t need to prove it with “numbers”, because they mean nothing at this point.
So, take it easy, huh bud?
Fix the line, Moreno will be fine.
There should be an 'unrec' button
that would turn post like this shit brown.
That rug really tied the room together...
by Streams Of Whiskey on Apr 21, 2010 9:42 PM MDT up reply actions 4 recs
That's one of the funniest comments in a long time SOW...
"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes" Douglas Adams
by orange&blue_aussie on Apr 21, 2010 9:47 PM MDT up reply actions
Yesss...LOLOL
- Whatever "it" was that got you to where you are today, "it" will certainly not be enough to enable you to stay there going forward! -
by BroncoSense72 on Apr 22, 2010 6:32 AM MDT up reply actions
Great way to sum things up Bena ...rec'd
we’ve already been over all the reasons Tebow might not make it in the NFL …you circumvent all of them nicely with an all purpose out that’s been touched on by many of us but never set out so well as you have…
Who flippin cares about what Tebow wants. Why are his desires above the teams? Is Tebow above the team?
If Tebow could solve our short yardage and goal to go plays with his hammer running style and ability to throw in those situations, draft the guy and make him run those plays.
If we take Tebow, developing him to be a legit QB in 2011 should be #3,342 on our list of what is important in 2010. Having him revive our short yardage game should be in the Top 3.
In my opinion.
I say we just draft Pouncey
and solve those problems the way they should be solved
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 9:00 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Time to clarify...
As I often do in these hot-button posts -
Things I didn’t say -
1. Tim Tebow cannot be a NFL QB
2. Tim Tebow sucks
3. Tim Tebow will fail
What I did say-
1. I don’t like gimmick football – YOU WILL NOT BEAT THE UPPER-ECHELON TEAMS IN THE NFL WITH GIMMICKS
2. Using Tebow in some-kind of gimmick fashion will hurt his long-term growth as a QB
3. The Broncos have bigger needs – all over the field.
4. I think Tebow needs a softer place to land
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
by John Bena on Apr 21, 2010 9:03 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Lastly...
If the Broncos decide to draft Tim Tebow, I will support him as a Denver Bronco 100%.
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
by John Bena on Apr 21, 2010 9:04 PM MDT up reply actions 7 recs
this
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 21, 2010 9:06 PM MDT up reply actions
SAME HERE!
I would hope you would support who we are. Not, who we are not. Coach Norman Dale "Hoosiers"
by dmitchell624 on Apr 21, 2010 10:01 PM MDT up reply actions
hahaha. Love the honesty but I just couldn't root against him.
by BroncoMath101 on Apr 22, 2010 12:57 AM MDT up reply actions
I am not a Tebow advocate
I do not believe he has the skills needed to be an NFL QB. With that said I believe in McDaniels system to develop quarterbacks. Many often over look intangibles, but let us not forget it takes a special leader of men to play the quarterback position in the NFL. The other plus is that McD plays so much shotgun that of the 32 NFL teams I believe that the Broncos would give him the best opportunity to succeed of all of the NFL franchises. I would prefer to trade down and take him late first if he is our man, so we can fill our other needs in the second round. In either case as you said I will suport our picks and hope for the best from them anf for our BRONCOS!!
"Cheering for the Lakers, Cowboys or Yankees is like going to Vegas, standing behind the dealer and cheering for the house."
Roger That!
- Whatever "it" was that got you to where you are today, "it" will certainly not be enough to enable you to stay there going forward! -
by BroncoSense72 on Apr 22, 2010 6:38 AM MDT up reply actions
+1
I’ve been the biggest Tebow naysayer for awhile, but I’ve always said that I trust our leaders…if they draft Tebow, then they know something I don’t and I’ll cheer him on.
"Precipitation, which side are you on?
Are you on the rise? Are you falling down?
Let me know, Come on let's go, yeah
Got some if you need it!" -EV
Nice article John
All things said Tebow knows how to win with the skills he ha, and he’ll bring a really great attitude with him. Is he a good fit for the Broncos, no I don’t believe so. He relies heavily on his ability to just take off when he feels he needs to. That style may work for a few teams, but it isn’t part of McDaniel’s offense.
"A great pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do" Walter Gagenot
"Hope sees the invisible, feels the intangible and achieves the impossible."
Great post, Bena.
I appreciate what Tebow brings to the table, and while I have doubts about his ability to be an impact NFL QB, I think his work ethic and smarts will allow him to get there some day.
However, along with all the things you’ve mentioned about him, the biggest reason I would dislike the pick, is because of the moves the front office has already made. For me, at this point, it has nothing to do with Tebow. If we picked up Tebow or any other QB, it would be the first sign to me that McDaniels and Xanders are mading bad decisions, and may not know what they are doing, contrary to what my thoughts of them have been thus far.
I know that may sound like a rushed judgement, and overly harsh, but let me explain. We acquired a QB via trade to be our starter (Orton), we drafted a developmental quarterback in last years draft, and we made another trade to bring one in this year, moving a player along with a draft pick to acquire Quinn. If McDaniels and Xanders have invested that much effort and resources into getting 3 quarterbacks on the roster, and they don’t feel comfortable with any of them, well, why the hell did they make those moves? I could understand bringing in another young quarterback in this year’s draft if we hadn’t made the move for Quinn, but not after that deal. I don’t know why they have even looked at Tebow, and I assume the only reason they have is as an immediate h-back/tight end hybrid, goal line, and Wildcat style player, with the potential to develop into a QB down the line.
Even if that’s the case, why? If your plan is to bring in Tebow to not be a QB, just get a player like Armanti Edwards in later rounds who can probably do the job just as well. There’s no value in drafting a converted QB to play another position in the 1st or 2nd rounds.
Fix the line, Moreno will be fine.
Whole conversation about him
Up above
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:43 PM MDT up reply actions
I have a felling it is going to happen
The people that are saying Tebow does not have the physical skill set to play QB at a high level obviously never watched him play. He can make all the throws in football. The only knock on Tebow is his mechanics which he is already started to fix and McDaniels can definitely fix his mechanics. If McDaniels can turn Cassel into and above average QB then he can turn Tebow into a very good QB.
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 9:06 PM MDT reply actions
Pat White. Came from the spread option, 2nd rounder project running QB. Slow delivery. And..............
Yes
Tebow is destined for a freak injury accident! Good, logical point!
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 21, 2010 9:09 PM MDT up reply actions
Wasn't freak
He just ran and got nailed. Few scrambling QB’s last long, Cunningham, Steve and Vince Young and Vick are some of the few that even come close to success.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:44 PM MDT up reply actions
He was probably looking to toss the option like in college and didn't see the blind side hit.
Which is why the spread option won’t work in the NFL. Running backs and Qb’s doing it would get blown up. Imagine trying to look in a lateraled (sp?) ball while a LB is lowering his helmet into your chest. Not pretty.
by BroncoMath101 on Apr 22, 2010 1:00 AM MDT up reply actions
Joe Theismann had his leg destroyed, but I'm not sure that he came from the spread option as a running QB.
He just happened to be in LT’s way……
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 21, 2010 9:12 PM MDT up reply actions
So, you're agreeing with me that being a spread option running QB does not equal having a debilitating injury?
Cool. Let’s pack up and go get a Dr. Pepper.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 21, 2010 9:16 PM MDT up reply actions
I'm underaged, so I'll stick with my Dr. Pepper.
Thanks for the offer, though. hahaha
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 21, 2010 9:19 PM MDT up reply actions
Tebow is a much better prospect
then Pat White and he is also a much larger dude. You cannot compare the two because they are nothing alike
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 9:18 PM MDT up reply actions
Tebow is a much better prospect according to you
They are scheduled to go in the same round, they came from almost the same system. They both are running QBs with a quarky delivery. But they are nothing alike right
Running QBs huh
Tebow is the 3rd leading Passer in SEC history. A player does not achieve something like this unless he is a good passer. Yes he can run the football but he is not a running QB.
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 9:25 PM MDT up reply actions
Good point
Spread options often do produce good passing numbers, but its because of the scheme used to defend the offense. Not really a function of QB play
The Scheme is a part of it
But the scheme did not make him the 3rd leading passer in SEC history. He superior talent as a QB did that for him. You could say that Bradfords and McCoys numbers were highly inflated by their schemes also. The scheme argument is not a very good one
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 9:32 PM MDT up reply actions
Bradford and McCoy
did not play in Pro Offenses. They played out of the Shotgun in spread offenses. They rarely if ever took snaps from center. It may not be the spread that Florida uses but it is a form of the spread. Oklahoma and Texas do not run pro offenses. Very few college teams run Pro Offenses these days. USC, Fresno state, Notre dame are the only ones I can think of really quick
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 10:18 PM MDT up reply actions
And I would take either of them
Over Tebow
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:46 PM MDT up reply actions
I would take Bradford
because he is by far the best QB in the Draft. No Thanks on McCoy
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 11:39 PM MDT up reply actions
You are right about McCoy
I was thinking about Clauson. But Bradford absolutely did come from a nfl type system, if fact he actually had about 50 percent of his snaps from under center, which is typical for the NFL. Plus Oklahoma used lots of two TE sets or two back sets.
Dude I am a huge OU
fan. They do have some pro stuff in their system but around 80% of their offense is out of the shotgun with 3 to 4 WR. They run more spread. Yes Bradford has taken snaps from under center but not alot.
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 11:40 PM MDT up reply actions
Cassel..
while never seeing the field, was in a Pro-Style offense at USC. Tom Brady, while barely seeing the field at Michigan, was in a pro-style offense.
Could Tebow pick up a pro-style offense? Perhaps, but it will take time. That is not a negative on Tebow, just a fact. Whether he succeeds or fails in it will largely be based on where he goes…..
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Everything I have heard
says all the coaches that have interviewed him have completely been blown away by his understanding of NFL OFFENSES. I think he he can and I know he will work harder then anyone in the building to get where he wants to be as a player
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 9:20 PM MDT up reply actions
This coming from someone
who like Colt McCoy and Tebow is much better then him
by gnarlybroncodude on Apr 21, 2010 9:22 PM MDT up reply actions
I'll have to respectfully disagree John, and you knew I would
But I have to say, you can’t say that playing in the Wild Horses would hinder Tebow’s development. I mean come on, the guy is a football player, through and through. He obviously WANTS to be a QB, and he has all of the tools to do so, but in all honesty, the guy would play linebacker if you asked him to.
I know you think Tebow has the skills to be an NFL QB, but where do you see our QB situation in three years? Do we re-sign Orton? Are we satisfied with mediocrity at the position, just a guy who will not make mistakes? Will Brady Quinn revert to his Notre Dame form and become a franchise quarterback like some thought he could be? Will he stay healthy? Is Tom Brandstater the long term solution?
No matter which way you paint the picture, the Broncos need stability and a future at the quarterback position. I hope Brandstater can be a diamond in the rough. I hope Quinn can stay healthy and win us some games. But the moves we’ve mades since McD got here indicate to me that we are looking for a long term solution at the QB solution, and Orton is not it.
The Broncos obviously like Tebow. Heck, I have not seen or heard about any other player that they have devoted so much time and attention to. They saw him and interviewed him at the Combine. They attended Florida’s pro day. They had Tebow in for a visit. McD and Xanders had Tebow in for a private workout. They clearly are interested, and I think it’s beyond due diligence at this point.
The Broncos have other needs on the team, but we saw last year that they don’t give a hoot if a guy can come in and make a significant contribution right away, they want tough, smart winners with versatility. As you pointed out, Tebow is all of those things. His intangibles are off the charts. McDaniels seems fairly confident that his new throwing motion will be effective.
The Broncos also don’t have a face to their franchise. They are not a marketable team right now, as is evidenced by their ONE prime time game this year. What reason does this nation have to watch the Denver Broncos? You throw Tim Tebow in a Broncos jersey, and people are going to be all eyes and ears. The Broncos’ popularity would skyrocket with Tebow on the team, regardless of whether anyone liked him or not.
The Broncos also have fantastic coaching at the quarterback position to develop Tebow in McDaniels and Mike McCoy. They don’t have a “game changer” if you will at the quarterback position. Some teams don’t need that, as history of the game indicates, but MOST teams do. Tebow is a guy you can count on to make a big play, whether it’s evading pressure and making one with his feet, or simply keeping the play alive and creating alternative opportunities.
Tebow is a guy that all 32 teams would love to have, and I know you would support him as a Bronco if he became one.
I want a guy who is going to bleed blue and orange with our first pick. I want a winner, a game changer, someone who is cerebral, someone who is dedicated, someone who lives and breathes Bronco football. In a day and age where so many young players are caught up in the hype and hubub of the NFL, as well as lost in their own pool of money, Tebow strikes me as an emotional leader who would play football even if he wasn’t getting paid.
Tebow is durable, he is the best bang for your buck, and he gives this fanbase hope for the future at the QB position.
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 21, 2010 9:09 PM MDT reply actions 3 recs
Also
I don’t think Tebow should be compared to Chris Simms as an athlete. That’s just mean!
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 21, 2010 9:12 PM MDT up reply actions
McNabb
How about comparing him to McNabb as an athlete and potential pro-QB.
What?
Please provide me with some dimensions. Tim Tebow is 6’3" 240. Far as I know, McNabb is shorter at 6’2", but he does look like he has some girth.
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 21, 2010 9:18 PM MDT up reply actions
I love McNabb
One of my favorite QB’s in the league, but because of the way he plays, he has only played all 16 games in 4 of his 10 seasons. He has still done well, but Tebow will try and take a hit, then realize LB’s and CB’s are bigger in the NFL.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:49 PM MDT up reply actions
Tebow is just as big
Tebow is listed as 6’3" 245lbs, McNabb 6’2" 240 lbs. About the same. Tebow is faster. I would guess you are right on the arm strength, but both have been questioned on accuracy.
Not comparing them as athletes...
Just bringing up the point that work-ethic alone won’t get it done…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Talent alone won't do it either, though.
But this is a very valid point.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 9:17 PM MDT up reply actions
A few points -
I could give a damn about primetime games. The Broncos sell out every game and have a waiting list the size of the Royal Gorge for season tickets. This website is a prime example of how far reaching Broncos Country is – from me in Cleveland to the members in the Netherlands, Australia, England, Japan, et al. If the NFL wants to keep the Broncos off Thursday, Sunday and Monday night, so be it…
As for Tebow, let me start by saying, if the Broncos feel he is a FRANCHISE QB, they should take him. Then, either put him on the shelf, meaning, the classroom, and teach him how to be a quarterback in a Pro-Style offense and let him get prepared the right way…
OR…
Start him Day 1 and hitch your cart to him.
Having Tebow play 30% of the snaps in some BS offense does not help him or the Broncos longterm. That is my position. I agree with all the intangible elements, but I also believe 100% that Tebow is a player that could go either way, depending on who takes him and how he is handled…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
by John Bena on Apr 21, 2010 9:19 PM MDT up reply actions 3 recs
And Puerto Rico... . far reaching indeed!!
I agree with this point, and I would hope if Tebow is drafted it is only to develop him. None of this Wildhorse / Slash nonsense.
1 prime time game + london
As a New Yorker, I guess that means more trips to the bar with satellite.
Sigh..
Exactly John...Put him on a shelf and let him acquaint himself to the NFL
I was hoping Shanny would of done that with Cutler, but he didn’t. I have a feeling Cutler talking to Shanny on the side may have been Jakes demise. Cutler should of had ample time to learn the system and NFL time line…Rushed to judgement.
by bfree2bronc on Apr 21, 2010 11:12 PM MDT up reply actions
I couldn't agree more
I'm glad we had this talk. -- TJ Johnson
by BroncoInExile on Apr 21, 2010 11:29 PM MDT up reply actions
Rec'd
Any comment with a Royal Gorge (my home town was Canon City) reference gets an automatic rec.
: )
Formerly known as Hoosierteacher or just HT.
"I presume that all of you here think me worthy of pity. But Great God, when I think I was on the point of doing nothing, I consider myself worthy of envy." Jean Valjean, Hugo's Les Miserables
by Steve Nichols on Apr 22, 2010 7:43 AM MDT up reply actions
My thoughts on Tebow
My first thought reading your posts and comments Sayre is that I fear you are putting too much stock into the Broncos actions. Such as bringing Tebow in for interviews and what not. I think it would be a big mistake for you and anyone to look too much into pre-draft chatter and visits, and I feel like you are most definitely using this chatter and attention as a main point for why the Broncos will take him. As certain as you are that this interest means the Broncos will trade up into the first round to get him, you should be just as certain that they are only doing their research incase he falls to them in the second round. You could very well be completely right about what will happen with Tebow, but using pre-draft chatter and interest as a pillar for opinions won’t last in the long-term.
With all that out of the way, if the Broncos take him then they believe he will be the future of the franchise and I would be behind that decision. If you can get a guy to be the franchise QB then you take him regardless of what your team needs are and whatever else.
But when i sit back and watch the debates about Tebow, it is clear to me that people are affraid of what might happen. If the Broncos take him and he is a bust then we are putting ourselves back 3-5 years. Orton was an 8-8 QB, say what you want about him, but that is a fact. If he is the starting QB then we won’t take a 3-5 year step back, we probaly wont win a championship (unless he shows more than he has shown, which is very possible.)
QB’s taken high bust all the time, and an example of how we have no clue what will happen, is something so simple as none of us know what his intangibles will do in a locker room. At the combine he was told to shut his f**king mouth, when he was trying to organize a wonderlick prayer. A college locker room is a bit different then an NFL locker room.
All these things aside, I am a supporter of Tebow, and I will root for him no matter where he goes. However if Denver drafts him then it is a big time gamble. If he busts then we are moving back 3-5 years. I have to be honest here, I don’t know how much more my heart can take after the last 2 offseasons.
If they roll the dice then I have someone to cheer for that I like, but there will be a brief moment as well where I will sit in my seat and say
“well if this goes bad then this will go as bad as it has ever been.”
With all that out of the way
by DW76 on Apr 21, 2010 9:47 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Great points DW
I totally agree, the scene of him at the combine shows that his leadership and charisma may not translate far into the NFL. I like Tebow too, just not for us and not in the 1st round.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:52 PM MDT up reply actions
I get it.
You love Tebow. It’s cool. And if Denver drafts him, I’ll support him 100%. However, I have a problem with this…
I know you think Tebow has the skills to be an NFL QB, but where do you see our QB situation in three years? Do we re-sign Orton? Are we satisfied with mediocrity at the position, just a guy who will not make mistakes? Will Brady Quinn revert to his Notre Dame form and become a franchise quarterback like some thought he could be? Will he stay healthy? Is Tom Brandstater the long term solution?
No matter which way you paint the picture, the Broncos need stability and a future at the quarterback position. I hope Brandstater can be a diamond in the rough. I hope Quinn can stay healthy and win us some games. But the moves we’ve mades since McD got here indicate to me that we are looking for a long term solution at the QB solution, and Orton is not it.
You pose hypotheticals that Orton, Quinn, and Brandstater may not be the long-term solutions. That may very well be true, but you ignore the possibility that they COULD be long-term solutions. The point is, we don’t know the answers to those yet. Orton did very well for his first year in this system, and Quinn and Brandstater have yet to play in it, so we have to reserve judgement.
You say we need stability, a Face of the Franchise. That’s great, we all want that. However, Tebow is no more of a certainty for those two questions than the 3 QBs currently on our roster. I cannot, for the life of me, understand what makes you think Tebow is any different or more promising than those other guys. Intangibles and work ethic, yes, he carries them in spades.
Again, I like Tebow and think he has the work ethic and intangibles be a good QB some day, but my problem is your reasoning for why Denver, specifically, should draft him. For what it’s worth: that quoted portion above is the only thing I disagreed with in your post. Everything else was spot-on.
Agree with your reasoning Rob. How are these block quotes done? They seem useful.
by BroncoMath101 on Apr 22, 2010 1:16 AM MDT up reply actions
At the bottom of this page there's a formatting guide below the other comment box... it will help BM
"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes" Douglas Adams
by orange&blue_aussie on Apr 22, 2010 3:51 AM MDT up reply actions
Why do we need ONE face for the franchise? Isn't that what McD is trying to change? We need lots of faces of this franchise
We need every player to be a face of this franchise. Tebow isn’t the answer to the Broncos. If he was drafted he would be a piece in the puzzle. We need quality players across the board. Every pick this year needs to be a face of the franchise.
by BroncoMath101 on Apr 22, 2010 1:10 AM MDT up reply actions
+1
I think in a draft this deep we can take a chance on Tebow, especially if we trade back and add more picks.
I'm going to bed
so I can wake up and its DRAFT DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Still got your Creedence...
by OutOfYourElement on Apr 21, 2010 9:17 PM MDT reply actions
I can't sleep. It's like I'm a 5 year old on Christmas Eve.
Of course, if we don’t go to sleep, then Santa won’t come down the chimney and give us our draft picks.
Or something like that……
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 21, 2010 9:18 PM MDT up reply actions
Just my idea.
I SUPPORT TEBOW AS A BRONCO IF THE FOLLOWING TRADES OCCUR:
Denver trades back in the first round and gets a second rounder for it as well.
with 3 second rounders (high second rounders), and a later first round pick, I would be fine with Tebow, but only in the second.
Comparing Michael Lombardi to Bill Williamson is like comparing an In-N-Out Cheeseburger to a sh## sandwich.
Williamson would probably eat both – no questions asked.
I have a better idea
Keep Orton Quinn and Brandstater
by Pmoreno95 on Apr 21, 2010 9:22 PM MDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Oh I like that idea!
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:53 PM MDT up reply actions
That would be way too logical!
- Whatever "it" was that got you to where you are today, "it" will certainly not be enough to enable you to stay there going forward! -
by BroncoSense72 on Apr 22, 2010 7:03 AM MDT up reply actions
Not to Mention...
Do you really want your Franchise QB of the future getting blown up by Ray Lewis, or Troy Polamalu, or on some bubble-screen or option play? Is that a joke???
That’s why I HATE the Wild Horses. If I am a DC, and I see a starting QB split wide, I’m elated.
1. I now can play 11-on-10 because I am not going to cover the QB.
2. If they do throw the ball to the QB I am going to blow him up because he’s now a ball carrier and all the QB-Skirt rules don’t apply.
Double your pleasure!
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Wild Horses i feel is a little different than the Wildcat
Its main purpose is just to have Orton to get a different point of view on the defense, and see what he can do with that.
But i do agree with you on your assessment of gimmick schemes.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 9:28 PM MDT up reply actions
Tebow and development
I agree with you that Tebow would not be a good choice for several reasons, obviously right now we are not going to use him and can we really afford to spend a 1st or 2nd round pick on a player who is going to be buried on the depth chart for years and someone who will need an entire rework of his most fundamental skill before he is ready to go.
In general I don’t like drafting offensive linemen who play in 2 point stances, QBs to play WR or TE, QBs with poor throwing mechanics and CBs who have to move to safety. Those players just tend to start too far behind the 8-ball, not only do they have to grasp incredibly complicated NFL systems, they also have to get used to the power and speed of the NFL game and the pro life and as we can see from the amount of people who never get it that is no easy task, but they also have to rework something that has been second nature to them for more than a decade in most cases.
Tebow has to rework his throwing mechanics, learn to read defenses (Florida uses almost exclusively 1-2 prereads, and Tebow would typically pick up and run after his 2nd read), learn to protect himself from the NFL defenders, improve his accuracy and keep the ball up higher as well as learning to play under center. It is all good he looks fine in workouts, but things will be different when he has 270 pounds of angry defensive end in his bubble.
Could it be...
that we are throwing all this Tebow speculation out there so that we can draft Colt McCoy? We did work him out in the past couple days.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 9:29 PM MDT reply actions
It's possible...
The Broncos did fly to LA to have a private workout with Mark Sanchez last year right before the Draft….
That said, everything I am getting is the interest in Tebow is real…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
Even if you were getting your information directly from McD I wouldn't believe you
The Broncos have done a nice job of basically saying we are in love with every prospect than anyone asks us about. A couple of em are bound to be honest evaluations, but nobody knows whats a smokescreen and whats not. Even if you talked to McD himself, he could be telling you anything he wanted to just to get the slightest advantage in taking the guys we actually want to take.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 9:33 PM MDT up reply actions
Because you don’t want to or because you legitimately DON’T believe it?
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 21, 2010 9:38 PM MDT up reply actions
I legitimately don't believe anything that is coming out of the sources right now.
I would be happy to have Tebow on our team. But we are forgetting that the month before the NFL draft is full of lies and misinformation.
Did the Broncos go around spreading rumors that we wanted to take Knowshon at #12? Nope.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 9:41 PM MDT up reply actions
My question for you is...
Are you believing the sources because you want to, or because they’re the sources?
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 9:44 PM MDT up reply actions
Because it's an opinion I've had for almost a year
and it’s finally being backed up. It’s not like I’m a huge Gator fan or something, I legitimately believe and always have believed that Tebow was a good fit for this team.
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 21, 2010 10:04 PM MDT up reply actions
It'll be backed if we take him.
until then, it’s just a rumor with a couple of visits and a press conference and some people twittering about it. None of that means anything.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 10:06 PM MDT up reply actions
It means more
Than if we hadn’t done anything at all. You can’t base a smokescreen off of a technicality. In fact, based on last year’s tactics, the Broncos place a high priority on guys they’ve had for pre-draft visits.
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 21, 2010 10:13 PM MDT up reply actions
Orakpo? Ziggy Hood? Clay Matthews?
All players we worked out last year. All of which we passed on.
I would almost guarantee that our first three picks are on that list somewhere. But to say which ones they will be is pretty much impossible at this point.
I’ll give you a 3 in 38 shot that Tebow is picked though, that seems reasonable.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 10:22 PM MDT up reply actions
Knowshon and Ayers
were both brought in also
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 21, 2010 10:23 PM MDT up reply actions
that's my point.
They are on there somewhere. But the fact is, Tebow is just one of the 38 at this point.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 10:25 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
+ 1
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:54 PM MDT up reply actions
Griese was a pimp though. Tebow has nothing on that

by Bronco$ on Apr 21, 2010 9:39 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Jen Aniston has ugly feet....my kind of girl
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
I understand how the anti-Tebow people feel
I felt the same way last year about Mark Sanchez. I felt that taking Sanchez was a waste of assets, that Orton would do just fine for the Broncos, and that we were a playoff team without him anyway.
I don’t think we can miss that opportunity two years in a row.
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
I wasn't totally opposed to Sanchez last year
but I’ve never had that much faith in Orton. I think to pass on Tebow this year would almost be as big of a gamble as taking him. We don’t have a face to our franchise right now. Orton is mediocre at best. Quinn is a huge question mark. Brandstater is an even bigger question mark. I’m not saying Tebow isn’t a question mark, but he has just as good of a chance if not better then the QB’s on our team.
imo.
I always believe there's a reason why you go through everything - John Elway
October 11, 2009: Remember the McD Fist Pump.
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
by Nick Cast on Apr 21, 2010 9:46 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think Sanchez
Would have done any better here than Orton did, he just would have cost more. Plus who knows how he would have done if he didn’t have pretty much the best D and running attack in the league. I don’t think we really missed much.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 10:56 PM MDT up reply actions
Should the Broncos take Tim Tebow with a pick in the 1st or 2nd Round?
Yes, he is a redzone threat, which is something we direly need. Preferably in the 2nd round, but I’m not opposed to the late 1st.
It's been said but not often
What about Orton’s impending big fat contract?
I’m in this “either way” frame of mind on Tebow. I don’t mind. But I’m trying to work out the motivation and flow on effects FROM a Tebow pick by the Broncos if it happened. I made a post recently about it but there are some motivating factors to draft Orton’s near term successor… and his new contract is likely a big one.
I have no idea how much McX will let a future contract influence their call on this but if, for them, it’s important then it could easily result in them calling Tebow’s name late on Thursday night…
Just saying.
"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes" Douglas Adams
by orange&blue_aussie on Apr 21, 2010 9:55 PM MDT reply actions
at this point in time, Orton does not have a big fat contract coming his wayB
But if he plays well enough to deserve one, then I’d assume he’d happily pay it.
But to answer your question about future contracts, it definitely has an effect on what GM/Coach’s do. Just look at Brandon Marshall. He was traded, above all other things, because we weren’t going to give him a contract extension.
by black_knight101 on Apr 21, 2010 10:00 PM MDT up reply actions
Oh yeah
No doubt it has an effect. I just wonder how much it affects THIS decision?
Orton will have a value and McX likely know what that is. And they’re going to have to work out whether that value is worth it. Exactly like the BM situation actually.
"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes" Douglas Adams
by orange&blue_aussie on Apr 21, 2010 10:07 PM MDT up reply actions
Here's hoping this debate is raging on this time tomorrow night...
…because while I’m largely open minded about spending a second rounder on the guy, I’ll be disappointed if he’s the only pick tomorrow night, or, worse, Denver shoots its second round juice to move back into the first to get him. Love the thought of the best case scenario; hate the very predictable QB controversy that will dog the franchise starting 12 seconds after he’s drafted.
I’m with John on the gimmick crap. Draft him only if you see him as a legit QB, not as cutesy little slash toy. I’ve seen nothing from him that indicates he’s a Kordell Stewart II— he’s not the athlete, doesn’t have the speed, and certainly doesn’t have the arm. Scrambling up the middle for 15 yards in a college spread is a whole lot different ball of wax than doing it against even the worst NFL defense.
Denialists replace the open-minded skepticism of science with the inflexible certainty of ideological commitment.-- Michael Spector
by PredominantlyOrange on Apr 21, 2010 9:58 PM MDT reply actions
John I agree completely with your article...
Considering Swiss cheese nature of both our offensive and defensive lines, the gaping hole at WR, the aging secondary we CANNOT afford to blow a pick on a project QB. Not when we’re looking at picking up a premier center (Pouncey), linebacker (McClain), NT (D Williams), CB (Haden)…
IF and that’s a BIG if we really want to draft a QB early why not take a chance with Claussen? He has sound mechanics and a big arm and he has played a in similar system in College.
Then again why did we trade for Brady Quinn? We still have Brandstater (Who showed promise this last preseason) Orton was serviceable, Sims was rightly kicked out the door. Does it look like Orton might be part of a surprise draft day trade?
by CombatChuk on Apr 21, 2010 9:58 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
This is a good post.
Some very valid points made, some of which I agree with. But I believe in Tebow. I think when someone is that talented and that driven to suceed, and are told by most pundits that they won’t suceed, they find a way to prove people wrong. I wouldn’t bet against Tebow.
This is a very high risk/high reward pick. Is it worth it? I don’t know. No one does, and all these people that pretend to are full of shit. I say roll the dice. It won’t be the difference of the Broncos going to the Superbowl or not either way next year.
That rug really tied the room together...
by Streams Of Whiskey on Apr 21, 2010 10:03 PM MDT reply actions
We won't draft Tebow
Pittsburgh will move up they will take him. Wonder what they would offer for #11.
by Utah Broncos fan on Apr 21, 2010 10:26 PM MDT reply actions
Pittsburgh
isn’t going to move UP to take Tebow. That ain’t happenin. They would just stay put and take him if they wanted him.
I always believe there's a reason why you go through everything - John Elway
October 11, 2009: Remember the McD Fist Pump.
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
No to Tebow
Brandstater is a better QB than Tebow right now in the NFL. Why would we start over again with another rookie? I think McD’s comments about Tebow was smoke.
Bronco fan since 1973 (the day I was born)..
From John's comment above..
The Broncos did fly to LA to have a private workout with Mark Sanchez last year right before the Draft….
That said, everything I am getting is the interest in Tebow is real…
I really believe McD would have drafted Sanchez if he somehow fell to 12, maybe he see’s a different light this year and won’t make the same mistake. This is all conjecture I assure you, but what if it were true? Hmm…If he doesn’t want McClain, Dan Williams or Dez Bryant with the #11 pick ir is possible that McX might pull the trigger that will cause a firestorm of interest from the fan-base and the media. We would be the talk of the draft and if it somehow worked in our favor 3 or 4 years down the road then they will be writing songs about us…Just think of it as a learnig process that we don’t have any control over and all we can really do is scratch our heads and wonder….Like usual!
I DISAGREE, I DEF WANT TEBOW
He is the kind of guy we need in at QB I say within the year if not in his year two he would start being a cornerstone of our franchise, have a feeling its going to happen fellas, embrace the Tebow
Nope..
See, you all fell for it..McD played the smoke card. No Tebow in Colorado! It won’t happen! To many other needs right now..
Bronco fan since 1973 (the day I was born)..
by timmaybronco on Apr 21, 2010 11:25 PM MDT up reply actions
And what type of QB do we need?
I like Tebow, but I just don’t want to use a pick, when we could improve both our passing game and running game with our picks. Rounds 1 and 2 should be Pouncy, and a WR, with our 45 being used on a LB.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 21, 2010 11:42 PM MDT up reply actions
Agree
I am really hoping for Pouncy,. I just don’t see Tebow worth it right now.
Bronco fan since 1973 (the day I was born)..
by timmaybronco on Apr 21, 2010 11:54 PM MDT up reply actions
Here's where I'm ok with this...
2nd round draft choices don’t always hit. We have two here, so using one on Tebow is a good roll of the dice that doesn’t have to pay off right away. It’s like playing with house money in my opinion. Worst case is he’s developed and becomes a solid backup in 2-3 years. If Bubby Brister can be a backup, Tim Tebow can be a better backup. Best case is….well, best case is he starts for 10 years and 4 lombardis.
2000 #45 – Kenoy Kennedy
2001 #51 – Paul Toviessi
2002 #51 – Clinton Portis
2003 #51 – Terry Pierce
2004 #41 – Tatum Bell, #54 – Darius Watts
2005 #56 – Darrent Williams
2006 #61 – Tony Can’t Wait For the Season To Be Over Scheffler
2007 #56 – Tim Crowder
2008 #42 – Eddie Royal
2009 #37 – Alphonso Smith, #48 Darcel McBath, #64 Richard Quinn
Our last 10 years of 2nd round draft picks. A couple home runs in there, a couple busts and solid players/contributors in between. I know it can almost be looked at as a crap shoot, so in my opinion, if we’ve got an extra 2nd round pick, why not take the chance on a guy who has the intangables that don’t come along that often.
Yeah, it’s not fun to think we could pass on another Eddie Royal with our extra 2nd round pick, but our pick could easily be a tim crowder too.
I don’t think our coaching staff cares what the media or fans would scream for to start him. I don’t give a crap about what media bighead said out of his butt this week because he had to get an article out on deadline…. or what joe six-pack thinks about starting a third string QB…. or fair weather fans that boo a preseason performance. I’ll pass listening to those people and take the risk.
I'm glad we had this talk. -- TJ Johnson
what do you have against bubby?
by Warren Todd on Apr 21, 2010 11:52 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
I like Bubby. He was hilarious as a person.
I just wanted a comparison to a QB who didn’t exactly set the NFL on fire.
I'm glad we had this talk. -- TJ Johnson
by BroncoInExile on Apr 22, 2010 1:46 AM MDT up reply actions
class of 09
Our three 2nd rounders from 09 will go a long way towards helping or hurting the team this year. I am hopeful for all of them, but none have leaped into stardom yet either. Eddie can also be lumped into this group after his sophmore slump. We have 2 more 2nd’s this year (so far). That is a lot of 2nd round picks in a 3 year period.
The rest of this list is fairly sorry. Portis was brillant considering we turned him into Champ + another pick. Crowder, Pierce and Scheffler were major disappointments.
It is depressing to look back at this list in the midst of our pre-draft salivating about all the great new players we are going to get. And this is the 2nd round!
call me the Grinch of Draftivus
You can look at our drafts round 1-4 the last five years and pinpoint exactly why we are and have been an average team. Finally though, I think we’re heading in the right direction for now, as well as building towards long-term success.
People can argue till they’re blue about our second round picks last year, but you can’t argue the great moves that were made to obtain so many early picks. For this year and last year. I think it lessens the risk of the 50% fail factor of draft picks if we can squeeze out an extra starter or two on average from our recent larger pool of players. In two years, we’ll have (baring trades), 3 1st round picks and 5 second round picks. Even at average, we should get 4 solid starters out of that group long-term. Better than the 1-2 starters we would with a normal amount of picks.
I'm glad we had this talk. -- TJ Johnson
by BroncoInExile on Apr 22, 2010 1:55 AM MDT up reply actions
I am not a fan of Tebow. I agree with timmay that McJedi's comments were smoke.
If we are serious about drafting Tebow, our 1st pick should a stud RT. Tebow is left handed as is Chris Simms. If Harris – being injury prone – is not able to play or goes down as he did last year, we had better have a guy ready to step in. Rodger Saffold, Trent Williams, Baluga, Anthony Davis, etc.
Then we need to address the rest of our needs as OC, ILB, WR, and OG. And we only will have 5 picks left.
I shake my head – drafting Tebow makes no sense. We have a good QB core. We have a guy who knows the offense that McJedi wants to run. And Quinn is more familiar with this type of offense than most coming from the situation in Cleveland. We need many other things than another QB.
I am not knocking Tebow. I am simply sick of hearing about him. I wish him a long and successful career somewhere other than in Denver. Ted Bartlett suggested that he could end up in Buffalo with their 1st pick. (I am in hope of that!!!) He could work into the offense and Chan Gailey would figure out ways to work him in to be productive.
Thanks John. Sure brought out a lot of passion today!
+1
+1
Bronco fan since 1973 (the day I was born)..
by timmaybronco on Apr 21, 2010 11:52 PM MDT up reply actions
"left tackle right tackle"
Is overrated. Defenses are going to attack the weakest part of your line. If you have a stud left tackle and a crappy center guard… they’ll just blitz up the middle and stunt inside and it won’t matter if the one DE is blocked perfectly. We need pouncey before a tackle
by Warren Todd on Apr 21, 2010 11:59 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
We actually need 3 guys on the OL: OC, LOG and depth behind Harris at RT.
You’re right that defenses will attack the weakest part of your OL. Especially with us having to face more 3-4 defenses, the attack point at the LOG, OC, ROG will be fierce – and again especially if they suspect there is a weakness there.
I mentioned above that we have a need at both OC and OG. I see these and other needs as greater than drafting another QB at this juncture.
Regardless of what happens with Tebow, everyone will claim they were right.
The lovers will say I told you so if he succeeds and if he fails they’ll say he started too early or the system was wrong or they didn’t play to his talents.
The haters will say I told you so if he fails and if he succeeds they’ll say the coach turned him into something great or his line is the best in football or something else. Everyone (ok almost everyone) has perfect hindsight and will find a reason to be right.
There are some who will come forward and say they were just plain wrong (unfortunately the few). I hope Tebow succeeds I just hope it’s not in the AFC West. The attention he gets from the media and the fans is a headache and a distraction in itself. I can just see the rookie Tebow being singled out by the media while players who worked their butts off go unnoticed. I can see the MSM pointing to Tebow as the savior of the Broncos (if they succeed with him). Sure Tebow is a team first player but that doesn’t stop his loyal followers from elevating him beyond his station as just another contributing member of the team. Sorry, ramble over.
That's what makes the internet so great.
You have a permanent record of people’s statements. The net is forever.
Formerly known as Hoosierteacher or just HT.
"I presume that all of you here think me worthy of pity. But Great God, when I think I was on the point of doing nothing, I consider myself worthy of envy." Jean Valjean, Hugo's Les Miserables
by Steve Nichols on Apr 22, 2010 6:45 AM MDT up reply actions
I hope that Tebow nails it in the NFL
I love to watch great football and if he can come into this league and entertain and win like he has done in College Football then the NFL is a better place for it.
If he does this in Denver well that would be incredible.
Do i think he is worth us investing a 1st round pick on? Maybe but only if we have already picked up someone before him.
If we get any opportunity to take him in the 2nd oh yes the upside his worth it.
My fear with this guy is that when you are portrayed as being holier than thou any discretion is a huge fall and because of this his personal life will be targetted it his reaction to this that I belive will be his biggest test.
Well, I voted No, but I disagree with the premise
I do believe that McDaniels and Tebow could work enough on him becoming a real QB while at the same time finding him a place in the offense this year. Tebow’s work ethic strikes me as enough to be able to handle both.
That said, I’m ambivalent to taking him. If we do, great, if not, well, that’s fine too.
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
I think you pegged my thoughts exactly.
I just used more space (below) to say it.
Good call.
Formerly known as Hoosierteacher or just HT.
"I presume that all of you here think me worthy of pity. But Great God, when I think I was on the point of doing nothing, I consider myself worthy of envy." Jean Valjean, Hugo's Les Miserables
by Steve Nichols on Apr 22, 2010 6:44 AM MDT up reply actions
My thoughts on Tebow.
I could care less either way.
First, I’m a fan of Tebow’s raw talent, and an even bigger fan of his strong character. In an age of “Big Bens”, “Mike Vicks”, and (to a little lesser extent) “Brandon Marshalls and Javon Walkers”, it amazes me that one or two folks might find fault with Tebow’s squeeky clean image. If Coach thinks Tebow makes the team better down the road, then I’m all for him.
On the other hand, I’ll be equaly thrilled to get someone who plugs in a clear position of need (such as the trenches, LB, or DB). Also, I’d be terribly dissapointed to get a QB to run “gimmick plays” (as John correctly points out).
In the end, I couldn’t vote yes or no. My answer is more along the lines of “Unless the player has some major red flags, I think the picks we get this year will be used wisely”. Too me, Tebow just isn’t a red flag player, but I don’t think he might be the best option either. In the end, I doubt we are even looking at him.
If I were drafting (and thank God for the Broncos that I’m not as I’m not qualified), I would take a pass on Tebow. I favor trading down, racking up picks, and going with “best player available” and “best value” until our team gets 2 to 3 years to get in McD’s mold. At that point, we could start targeting star quality players.
Formerly known as Hoosierteacher or just HT.
"I presume that all of you here think me worthy of pity. But Great God, when I think I was on the point of doing nothing, I consider myself worthy of envy." Jean Valjean, Hugo's Les Miserables
In the end, I couldn’t vote yes or no.
Great post. This encapsulates my thoughts exactly. I wasn’t able to vote either way because I’m conflicted for the same reasons.
by Gristle McThornbody on Apr 22, 2010 8:27 AM MDT up reply actions
Fully agreed
There is a tension between developing him as a long-term quarterback and using him to run confusing offensive sets. I would be OK with the latter, but, really — at what cost? A special-skills guy in the second round is OK. Vladimir Ducasse or Cam Thomas or a big guy who plays in the trenches…. that’s better.
By the way, I don’t know if you were trying to stir the pot with that title, but I for one am amused.
It's a hot-button topic....
I have gotten the question 1000 times, so I wanted to wait until the Draft give my opinion. I also wanted to be clear that I wasn’t bashing Tebow – but for the Broncos, right now, it’s not the time to do it. In my opinion anyway…
-TSG
SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport
Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605
Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!
XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru
33%
a little higher than i thought it would be
I gave up a life of crime, I gave it to a friend of mine
he could be the answer to our short yardage woes at RB/FB
But whoever gets him will grossly overpay pick wise do to the over the top hype around him.
We have too many other needs...
…and I think management realizes this. I would be more concerned that they were planning on taking Tebow if they hadn’t traded for Brady Quinn. I think he keeps them from making any decisions at the QB decision for at least one more year.
Now, if they want to trade the farm for Jake Locker next year, as a Husky fan, I’m all for that! :)
The thing that always makes me pause about Tim Tebow is the religious aspect. Not that I have anything against it, but players in the NFL seem to. There has been a lot written about the division in the locker room between Kurt Warner and his teammates. Kurt Warner and Tim Tebow are a lot alike in that regard. I remember a lot of problems coming up when Kurt Warner went to NY. I’m sure it’s different from team to team – I don’t recall hearing any issues in AZ – but that’s something that can really cause problems.
Where Tim Tebow is supposedly going to be picked, I think the Broncos could find better value at a position of higher need. QB isn’t a need for this team that needs to be addressed in the 1st or 2nd round. And in my opinion, Tebow isn’t in that “only comes around once in a decade” discussion.
Jake Locker on the other hand….okay, my bias is cropping back up. Better stop typing.
Brian Dawkins
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 22, 2010 9:00 AM MDT up reply actions
Again, I'm sure it differs from team to team.
And honestly, I don’t think it would be an issue with the Broncos. This team is full of high-character guys who, if not accepting it, would at least respect it. That’s one thing I really like about the job McDaniels has done.
I agree.
We’ve got a lot of character guys on the team. They are all different people, but they are great teammates. That is what McD is trying to build. I don’t think Tebow’s religion will have a major influence on his ability to be a quarterback in Denver or be accepted in the locker room. I’m more concerned about his ability as a QB than his religions beliefs.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 22, 2010 9:11 AM MDT up reply actions
A good one, but I am kinda serious...
…His numbers were pretty good last year, he has thrown the deep ball well when asked, and his team-mates like him. This team has the beginnings of an elite Defense and what could be a All-star back in Knowshon Moreno. Also, if the O-line plays up to their talent level, we have seen how well KO can do
Not that this gives us any clue what is going on
but Tebow’s agent is convinced he knows where Tebow is going to land. Kind of odd, it’s not like Cutler (for example) had any clue that he would be coming to the Broncos.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/commentary/news/story?page=howard/100422
by black_knight101 on Apr 22, 2010 11:43 AM MDT reply actions
sorry that link doesn't work
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/commentary/news/story?page=howard/100422
hopefully this does
by black_knight101 on Apr 22, 2010 11:47 AM MDT up reply actions
I have a feeling...
We trade down and our first pick is…TIM TEBOW! I think the temptation is too strong for McD, he sees the QB he will win his first Super Bowl with in 2 years. Too hard to pass up. Orton is the classy veteran to assist his development, Quinn is the solid back-up. All I can say is I have a funny feeling…

by 










































