Mock First Round

With the start of the 2010 NFL Draft less than eleven hours away, I finally feel secure publishing my projection of the full first round. Hopefully, I'll be able to do the same for the two other segments of the the draft being held tomorrow and the day after as well. Draft preparation this offseason has been a long process, but an enjoyable - and, I hope, entertaining - one. For me, this is a bittersweet moment, but it's certainly heavy on the sweet!
Before we get to the mock itself, I'd like to share a few general notes that will hopefully preempt some of your questions, comments and/or concerns. I did not project any trades, but I accounted for their likelihood by focusing on needs rather than value. In that way, I built in the outcome of potential deals without having to predict any specifics. There are, however, some unexpected predictions in here that are sure to raise a few eyebrows, so hopefully you won't feel as though you're looking at what you've already seen elsewhere around the web. And so, without further ado, here's how I see today's first round breaking down:
1. St. Louis Rams - Sam Bradford, QB, Oklahoma
2. Detroit Lions - Ndamukong Suh, DT, Nebraska
3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Gerald McCoy, DT, Oklahoma
4. Washington Redskins - Russell Okung, OT, Oklahoma State
5. Kansas City Chiefs - Dan Williams, DT, Tennessee
6. Seattle Seahawks - Derrick Morgan, DE, Georgia Tech
7. Cleveland Browns - Eric Berry, S, Tennessee
8. Oakland Raiders - Trent Williams, OT, Oklahoma
9. Buffalo Bills - Bryan Bulaga, OT, Iowa
10. Jacksonville Jaguars - Dez Bryant, WR, Oklahoma State
More below the fold!

Could this match-up continue to play out in the AFC West for years to come?
If the Broncos are unable to trade down, then this pick could go a number a different ways with the top ten that I projected above, but Pouncey would certainly be under consideration. If they find a way to trade down, however, then most of those other options would no longer be feasible, yet Maurkice would definitely be among the group of remaining potential targets - if he's available - when Denver goes back on the clock. Though I'm not entirely comfortable with calling his name here, he has the potential to turn our single greatest deficiency into a strength right out of the gate and for years to come. So, while his overall value may make this pick a bit of a "reach", he probably represents the greatest possible marginal value of any likely choice for us. Since he's been a fan-favorite on MHR for some time now, it might be superfluous to include my personal scouting notes here, but I guess it's better to be safe than sorry!
Scouting notes: great all-around technique... uses his hands very well... great timing... plays with very good leverage... displays good awareness... is willing to help linemates if possible and when necessary... demonstrates impressive power... has the size and strength to handle bigger defensive tackles... is quick and agile enough to handle penetrating DTs... has good balance... plays well in space... has a mean streak... is the unit leader... is tough... has proven durability... played in a shotgun system.
On to the remainder of the first round!
12. Miami Dolphins - Brandon Graham, DE/OLB, Michigan
13. San Francisco 49ers - Anthony Davis, OT, Rutgers
14. Seattle Seahawks (from Denver) - Jimmy Clausen, QB, Notre Dame
15. New York Giants - Rolando McClain, ILB, Alabama
16. Tennessee Titans - Joe Haden, CB, Florida
17. San Francisco 49ers (from Carolina) - Earl Thomas, DB, Texas
18. Pittsburgh Steelers - Mike Iupati, G, Idaho
19. Atlanta Falcons - Jason Pierre-Paul, DE, South Florida
20. Houston Texans - Kyle Wilson, CB, Boise State
21. Cincinnati Bengals - Jermaine Gresham, TE, Oklahoma
22. New England Patriots - Sergio Kindle, DE/OLB, Texas
23. Green Bay Packers - Charles Brown, OT, Southern California
24. Philadelphia Eagles - Taylor Mays, S, Southern California
25. Baltimore Ravens - Devin McCourty, CB, Rutgers
26. Arizona Cardinals - Sean Weatherspoon, LB, Missouri
27. Dallas Cowboys - Rodger Saffold, OT, Indiana
28. San Diego Chargers - C.J. Spiller, RB, Clemson
29. New York Jets - Jerry Hughes, DE/OLB, Texas Christian
30. Minnesota Vikings - Tim Tebow, QB, Florida
31. Indianapolis Colts - Jared Odrick, DT, Penn State
32. New Orleans Saints - Everson Griffen, DE, Southern California
Perhaps the most startling projections above are the quarterbacks after Sam Bradford. Personally, I think that Cleveland, Buffalo and perhaps Oakland - the franchises in the top ten most likely to be landing spots for Jimmy Clausen - are far more interested in the second tier QBs that most believe will be available to them at their current picks in the second round. Obviously, however, I think Tim Tebow won't stay on the board that long. I have a sneaking suspicion that someone will trade into the last third of the first round to secure him and that, barring that, the Vikings won't pass up the opportunity to take him at #30.
As for our division rivals, I'd be slightly concerned about these picks as a Broncos fan. Dan Williams to Kansas City at #5 would certainly be viewed as a reach, but it wouldn't be more of one than our taking Pouncey at #11 and I think most of us would be at least pleased by that. Their general manager, Scott Pioli, has shown that the Chiefs will be looking to emulate the Patriots and that means spending high value picks along the defensive line. It's been fun projecting Bruce Campbell (both the workout warrior and the B-movie star) to Oakland, but I just don't think that holds water... at #8. If Trent Williams is available there, then he'll be Raider; don't forget, he's a rare athlete for the position as well. If not - and they go for a guy like Iupati instead - then expect Campbell to be my pick for them in the second round. Finally, the Chargers are the beneficiaries of no team truly needing a running back and my belief that Spiller's just not an elite prospect, at least not overall. That said, he'd still be a great value at #28 and would be an upgrade - moderate as it may be - over what they've at RB these last couple of years.
Well friends, that's it for me for now. If I left any questions unanswered, feel free to ask them below. As always, your input is deeply appreciated, so don't hold anything back! I look forward to chatting with you in the comments as we anticipate the start of the real thing later tonight; go Broncos!
100 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The day has FINALLY come!!!! I’ve been waiting soooooo long. It’s my favorite day of the year. The best pseudo-holliday there is. The day that is going to go a loong way towards determing our future!
Yep…the day has finally arrived. HAPPY EARTH DAY EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
HOLY CRAP ITS EARTH DAY?!
I totally thought it was shabaz.
ok I honestly have no idea what Shabaz is other than a jewish religous something…and I most likely spelled it wrong but HEY ITS FOR THE SAKE OF COMEDY!!!
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
I sure hope we get Pouncey
If Zappa’s great posts analysing McX’s draft strategy is correct than he will bolster either the O or D-line. It is my hope that the pick is Pouncey because, while I believe that great teams are built from the inside out, so is the offensive line, the LT notwithstanding.
There’s all sorts of buzz about them trading down and maybe picking Tebow. If we do trade down, I hope we can still get Pouncey at that spot and go from there. Don’t feel that we need Tebow.
I’m begging/hoping/praying for Pouncey, which likely means that I am going to be very disappointed this evening with they way my prayers get answered. :D
It takes neither courage nor intelligence to cheer for a team only when that team wins. The true test of a fan's mettle is the same as it is for a player: Were you there when you were needed?
aka Solace
I'm hoping we trade back and still get pouncey. :)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
Pouncey + a 3rd at 15 would be almost perfect (because IUPATI next to Clady would be perfect)...
…and if you believe PFT, the Giants have two good reasons (McClain/Spiller) to make the deal.
Denialists replace the open-minded skepticism of science with the inflexible certainty of ideological commitment.-- Michael Spector
by PredominantlyOrange on Apr 22, 2010 8:05 AM MDT up reply actions
I know I have said it before
But I would like to look at flipping that 3rd and maybe next years 1st to move back up and take Lupati too.
Seriously, who WOULDN’T want to put Lupati and Pouncey next to each other. And yes, I know we have Seth Olson and he probably will be just fine if we can upgrade the Center position.
User name pronounced Air-Ah-Miss Originally from my days in the SCA, became a gamer and forum tag because it is odd and it is a name I like
I'd prefer we draft Iupati
with an I, I’ve heard he’s far superior ;-) (Sorry, I can’t help myself, it’s a pet peeve) But yeah I would be stoked if we get either one of those guys. Both of them would be too much to dream about…
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.
Unrelatedly, (sorry I’m a little mocked out) do you guys think that there is any way that the faiders aren’t trying to get BenBerger on their roster? Have any of you heard any thing?
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
Word is they tried but Steelers wanted the no.8 pick..
but the Raiders would only give that if no.18 was exchanged.. so no deal..
Both teams may get more desperate closer to draft deadline so it could still happen i guess.
Big Ben.
His situation is so unique that I have a hard time seeing a deal getting done with anyone. In all seriousness, he’d be the perfect fit in Oakland, so I hope he doesn’t end up a Raider any time soon…
MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!
Agreed.
I still think he’ll be traded by draft time but am not sure to who, now. Schefter recently tweeted that the Faiders are no longer interested, but who’s to say if that’s a smoke screen or not. The days or two leading up to the draft are filled with disinfo by teams, IMO. A lot of blustering going on. For example, the latest report that Shanny is still interested in getting the No. 1 pick to get Bradford. You guys buy that? I don’t. Why would they get McNabb and not get a LT to protect him? Doesn’t compute.
by Gristle McThornbody on Apr 22, 2010 8:35 AM MDT up reply actions
I just heard an interview with a SF Chronicle guy on ESPN who said the faiders are definitely still interested and doing their best to work something out by tonight. Who knows? I guess I have a terrible gut feeling that benberger (not capitalized in anticipation of the trade…among other things) will be a faider by the end of the day.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 22, 2010 8:38 AM MDT up reply actions
Interesting.
But even if Big Ben aligns with the Crypt Keeper they’re still a dysfunctional team, through and through. One good QB does not a complete team (or franchise) make. :)
by Gristle McThornbody on Apr 22, 2010 8:46 AM MDT up reply actions
I would give up the 8 for a franchise QB already signed to a long term deal.
Where would Russell go? Home?
Yeah...Right after a quick run through the In-n-Out to stock up for the night...
- Whatever "it" was that got you to where you are today, "it" will certainly not be enough to enable you to stay there going forward! -
by BroncoSense72 on Apr 22, 2010 12:23 PM MDT up reply actions
Raiders Would Bs Crazy To Not Get BR
The Raiders will screw up the #8 pick anyway so it would be like getting BR for free. They would be a good team with BR and give me one more good reason to hate the raiders. However, they would be good enough that I could no longer pity them.
by ocbroncomaniac on Apr 22, 2010 10:21 AM MDT up reply actions
Ben's gonna be a Raider
Round 1 Pick 8 even trade, right as the Raiders hit the clock, then the Steelers turn around and draft Iupati with the 8th pick and CB Kyle Wilson with the 18th pick.
by Broncosfan28532 on Apr 22, 2010 10:59 AM MDT up reply actions
Merry Draftivus!
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
And A Merry Draftivus To You, Too!
MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!
Did Santa leave us any Dravftivus toys under the MHR Draftivus tree last night?
…… no?……….. we still have to wait until 7:30?
That’s a bummer, man.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
Hmmm...
I think the Draftivus “Santa” might be Mel Kiper (with McShay as head elf) which would mean that he’s liable to steal whatever hair products you have around your house instead of leaving any presents…
MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!
Good call, EJ. I was wondering why there was no more Dep hair gel in my bathroom.......
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 22, 2010 8:02 AM MDT up reply actions
I don't want Fop dammit, I'm a Dapper Dan man!
You watch your mouth, this is a public market. You want Dapper Dan, I can get it for ya in two weeks.
Well isn’t this a geographical oddity? Two weeks away from everything!
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination."
- Andrew Lang (1844-1912)
Damn, we're in a tight spot.
…….
…….
…….
Damn, we’re in a tight spot.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 22, 2010 3:38 PM MDT up reply actions
Trade with NYG for their 15th and 3rd round pick. They take McClain
We take Pouncey at #15. That is my best case scenario for tonight.
In my opinion.
by McGeorge on Apr 22, 2010 7:58 AM MDT reply actions 4 recs
Yeah.
And that would work with my mock! ;)
MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!
Or
Phone the giants – tell them we are picking McClain but if they get who we want at 15 we will flip the picked players for their 3rd.
That way if someone hops up and takes who we want at 15 we still got our second choice player (assuming McClain is our second choice pick).
Sorry...
…didn’t mean to poach above. Didn’t see your comment when I posted above. Agreed almost completely.
What’s next— A middle east peace accord?
Denialists replace the open-minded skepticism of science with the inflexible certainty of ideological commitment.-- Michael Spector
by PredominantlyOrange on Apr 22, 2010 8:08 AM MDT up reply actions
+1
- Whatever "it" was that got you to where you are today, "it" will certainly not be enough to enable you to stay there going forward! -
by BroncoSense72 on Apr 22, 2010 8:20 AM MDT up reply actions
I like that scenario.
I hope Denver doesn’t trade back more than 3-5 spots. Any further and Iupati or Pouncey will be gone.
by Gristle McThornbody on Apr 22, 2010 8:37 AM MDT up reply actions
At first I was against the idea of picking a C at the 11th pick; however, if this guy is as good as advertised and is a possible long-term solution at the position then I’m good with it. If HCMcD want to run the ball then obviously it’s not going to happen without a dominant o-line .
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 22, 2010 7:58 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I really believe...
…that football is going to start changing back to a running game. Not a whole lot, but it’s swung way out towards passing on almost every down. And I also think that McD thinks this as well. If I am correct (and I’m a self professed idiot, so take this with a grain of salt) then I really think he will address the oline early.
It takes neither courage nor intelligence to cheer for a team only when that team wins. The true test of a fan's mettle is the same as it is for a player: Were you there when you were needed?
aka Solace
It’s the Footballian Dialectic…lol.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 22, 2010 9:12 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m sure I’m not the only one.
It takes neither courage nor intelligence to cheer for a team only when that team wins. The true test of a fan's mettle is the same as it is for a player: Were you there when you were needed?
aka Solace
I agree with you. I was referencing the Hegelian dialectic (sorry…a little obscure. I’m not sure how anyone was supposed to get that). I definitely think that HCMcD is trying to stay one step ahead of the curve by building a bruising power run offense as defenses around the league are getting lighter and faster to try to stop the spread. Just when the defenses have discovered that they are finally light and fast enough to stop the Colts and Saints, here comes the Denver Broncos with 1970s-esque offensive that pounds the ball right down your throat. All of a sudden all of those picks spent on light, fast pass coverage LBs and tiny CBs don’t look so valuable.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 22, 2010 9:50 AM MDT up reply actions 4 recs
Yes
and rec’d
It takes neither courage nor intelligence to cheer for a team only when that team wins. The true test of a fan's mettle is the same as it is for a player: Were you there when you were needed?
aka Solace
Thanks Doc. I figured if that was going to make sense to anyone it’d be you.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 22, 2010 10:38 AM MDT up reply actions
Rec'd!
This comment needs to be green!
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination."
- Andrew Lang (1844-1912)
KK, where you at?
It’s at 4. Time for you to do your deed…..
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 22, 2010 3:38 PM MDT up reply actions
One interesting question today
I am curious to see who will benefit with the CJ Spiller pick.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
Pouncey or Iupati would be great
Hi from Shanghai hitting the sack. Draftivus @ 7:30pm your time C-ya.
oc60
"We are what we think.
All that we are arises with our thoughts.
With our thoughts, we make our path."
Good call on Bryant to the Jags
I’m having the same feeling. They really need receiver help, probably won’t be able to trade the 10 spot and he’ll still be there at 10. That makes sense, anyway. Then Denver doesn’t have to pick him. ;-) And can trade down a bit.
Will be interesting to see what happens with Tebow. I still see him as early 2nd round, not late 1st, but who knows…
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.
Off Topic, but...
Did anyone happen to see the South Park episode last night where Cartman finds out he is “half Denver Bronco” and that makes him pretty cool
"Mr. President, call in the National Guard! Send as many men as you can spare! Because we are killing the Patriots! They need emergency help!"
by bronco-Maine-iac on Apr 22, 2010 8:31 AM MDT reply actions
haha yes
its good to see matt and trey are still true broncos fans which is more then you can say about a lot of “fans”
"Have you ever heard of the emancipation proclamation?"
- "I don't listen to hip-hop"
by BroncoJoe311 on Apr 22, 2010 9:37 AM MDT up reply actions
HEY!!!!
GOOD JOB RUINING THIS FOR ME!!! I actually was looking forward to that episode……
Any movement in history which attempts to perpetuate itself, becomes reactionary.
- Marshal Broz Tito
by BosnianBronco on Apr 22, 2010 11:23 AM MDT up reply actions
BTW ejruiz, I said you’d get 0-5 accurate. Not because I don’t trust you football acumen but more because I think that trying to accurately predict the draft is akin to trying to fill out a perfect bracket. It’s pretty tough. That’s part of the reason that I don’t take part in or pay much attention to mocks beyond trying to learn about the players in the draft.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
No Worries...
I voted for 0-5, too! ;)
MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!
I pretty confident in your top two picks though (i think…lol).
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 22, 2010 8:46 AM MDT up reply actions
I have decided to make no predictions for today
I was going to, and then I remembered how passionately I once argued that Greg Oden should be drafted over Kevin Durant in the 2007 NBA draft. I had at least 5 airtight and compelling arguments.
I have found my limitations.
Therefore, time to sit back, relax, and enjoy the day…
Eh.
It’s impossible to be good at these sorts of predictions, which is why it’s so fun! At the very least, it’s why it is open to everyone…
MileHighReport.com member since 02/06/07, promoted to "Position Coach" (i.e. new staff writer) on 02/16/10!
TRADE UP!!
Anyone else get the idea that mcD might be trading up, he has not mentioned it, nothing points to him moving up, he stated they would be up to move back and seem to want to and every thing I have read has numerous top 5 teams wanting to trade back. I am sticking to my initital mock back in January where, I predicted Denver trades for Quinn ( I said 1 3rd and Scheffler ittle off there) and that McD will move up to get Suh. I am predicting ( I am sure I am wrong) that McX trades up and we draft Suh or maybe Berry IMHO. We will see.
2/3 of the earth is covered by water the other 1/3 is covered by Champ Bailey!
THIS IS BRONCOS COUNTRY!!!
Why take Pouncey at 11 when we can take him with the 14th pick instead
Due to the fact the broncos have two first round picks, 11th and 14th we have amazing flexibility to trade up or stay put and pick up Pouncey with our second first round pick. What? We don’t have a second first round pick? Oh that is right, we traded that away last year for some guy who did not even really play. Hmmm. wonder if that trade looks so good, considering if we had it we could pick whoever we wanted at 11 and Pouncey at 14.
We don't have the 14th pick.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 22, 2010 9:22 AM MDT up reply actions
I don't think so. I think we just cut him.
We might get a compensatory pick next year. Maybe…..
I’m not quite sure how that stuff works, though.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 22, 2010 9:45 AM MDT up reply actions
your sarcasm bores me
"Have you ever heard of the emancipation proclamation?"
- "I don't listen to hip-hop"
by BroncoJoe311 on Apr 22, 2010 9:39 AM MDT up reply actions
ZZzzz
- Whatever "it" was that got you to where you are today, "it" will certainly not be enough to enable you to stay there going forward! -
by BroncoSense72 on Apr 22, 2010 12:28 PM MDT up reply actions
That trade still rides my nerves too!! Even if we didn't want to pay 4 first rounders in two years, imagine
what we could do with that pick this year….talk about trading down and really setting ourselves up for great things. But no, we were unprepared and jumped to get A SMith. Dude better come through this year. Its a mans game, and he looked childish out there.
Mel Kiper
Just curious, anyone with an ESPN insider sub check to see who Mel Kiper’s Hair has the Broncos picking in 1st round? I can only see the 1st 5 picks.
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.
Pouncey would really be a gutsy pick at #11
but I like it. I am more concerned about the W-L record than in the value in draft points. Pouncey (and the addition of a good left guard – Olsen?) would mean the revival of a running game – all Orton would need to put the passing game back in gear.
IMHO.
-
BILLY THOMPSON GOT SHAFTED!!
The only problem with Pouncey
would be the contract that goes with #11. Would the Broncos be willing to pay a center that kind of money? And it would not be a way of winning friends and influencing people throughout the league. With that in consideration, it becomes less likely that the Broncos would spring for Pouncey at #11. However, the Denver Post reports that the Broncos are negotiating heavily to move down in the round. So we’ll see, of course . . .
BILLY THOMPSON GOT SHAFTED!!
I would rather pay Pouncey
Or Lupati,and improve a serious weakness on our team than pay McClain who WOULD be a huge player, but is not truly helping a serious weakness.
But, if they go with McClain at 11 I am still ok. Now if it is Bryant, I may pull a McGeorge post out.
User name pronounced Air-Ah-Miss Originally from my days in the SCA, became a gamer and forum tag because it is odd and it is a name I like
Haha
It may just be easier to let McGeorge do it himself.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Apr 22, 2010 11:17 AM MDT up reply actions
If Pouncey turns out to be as good as he's being advertised
Then he’s definely worth #11 money. Nobody is complaining about paying Clady #12 money. If he’s truely one of the best Centers to come around in a long while he’d be worth it.
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination."
- Andrew Lang (1844-1912)
i love mayhem
i hope big ben gets traded, washington moves up, and the raiders draft jimmy clausen
I gave up a life of crime, I gave it to a friend of mine
In my final mock
…the Broncos landed Haden at 11.
I’m hoping they can trade back, but if not, I wouldn’t be at all surprised.
Breaking news: Drew Brees will be on the cover of Madden 11.
Sorry Saints fans (and sorry if this isn’t really breaking news).
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
Will any non-draft post last
On the sidebar longer then 6 hours? Man this day will be too long.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Picking Maurkice Pouncey at 11 would be akin to the tRaiders picking Jacoby Ford at 8!
It would be an unprecedented move. I am not certain of the rarity of taking a Center in the top 11, but i think the percentages would be close to 0.000001 j/k btw. I believe if the McDX gang want Pouncey they will slide down later in the first, maybe with the Giants at 15, the Pats at 22 or the Packers at 23. If we stay at 11 the only logical choice would be Rolando McClain, Dan Williams or Dez Bryant. All three of these prospects are rated at or near the 11th selection and are a need.
What's wrong with Pouncey at 11?
I don’t understand why there is so much gnashing of teeth over that. If McDaniels and Xanders really believe that he’ll be here a long time and significantly improve the interior line, I have no issue at all with taking a center at 11.
Frankly, center is the most undervalued position on any roster. Great centers are few and far between. If we could go back 15 years, even with money situations what they are now, is there anyone here that wouldn’t draft Tom Nalen with that 11th pick based upon the fact that he’s a center? If you raised your hand, you’re lying.
If Pouncey’s as good as advertised, and you can’t trade down, take him at 11. If you can trade down and still get him, by all means, do it. I would say that about any player, though.
I hate the Red Wings.
I made a similar argument a little higher on the thread; however, the obvious reason nobody wants to draft a Center at 11 is that it would obligate the Broncos to pay a Center much more than Centers are usually paid. Aaron Maybin, last year’s 11th pick, signed to a 5 year $25 million contract, $15 million guaranteed. The highest paid Center in the NFL currently is Rams’ Jason Brown, who signed a five-year, $37.5 million deal ($20 million in guarantees) last offseason. The Crabtree deal last year might mean that high picks will earn significantly more money this year. So??? It’d be a pretty steep starting point sign a Center that has never played an NFL down to a potentially $30 million plus contract.
Nevertheless, I stated above that I’d be okay with it.
"C" is for Championship...that's good enough for meeeee!!!
by PosterNutbag on Apr 22, 2010 11:44 AM MDT up reply actions
This is exactly right...
If Pouncey ends up great, its not a big deal. He is paid like a top Center, but if he is, who cares.
The problem is if he ends up being just good… say an average NFL starter quality. We’re then stuck with a $30mil contract that prevents us from spending money on other FAs and positions… or cutting him and looking for someone cheaper. Other positions tend to be paid more, so its not a big deal. Its also not a big deal if we trade down ~5 spots.
Basically, the reason teams don’t draft centers high is because there is no room for error… if you don’t hit the home-run and get an All-pro, you’ve busted and are hurting the team. There is no room in the salary structure for just filling a need with a good player. Given the high bust rate for all draft prospects, that makes any such pick REALLY risky.
Don't get mad at me I'm not the one who makes the drafting rules...
Teams typically don’t draft Centers in the top 20. Go back 10 years and see how many were taken at 20 or below…I’m a Matt tennant fan anyway so it doesn’t matter to me. Tennant is a center who has taken on NT’s mano-a-mano…Just saying.
by bfree2bronc on Apr 22, 2010 12:03 PM MDT up reply actions
Trade down, get Pouncey, Tebow, Receiver
Dream first three picks: Pouncey, Tebow, and a great receiver.
I will say this, denver seems to be of a handfull of teams that might take tebow
also… does anyone know where you can see what picks denver currently hold for next year?
I gave up a life of crime, I gave it to a friend of mine

by 





































