2010 NFL Draft 'Semi' Instant Reaction - Denver Broncos Draft Grades
Let's be honest. Grading Draft picks before they go through one mini-camp practice is a bit ridiculous. It does generate conversation, however, and give the fans of the Broncos a chance to let their voice be heard. With that, I present a Monday-morning, post-NFL Draft Poll.
Feel free to let us know what Grade you gave, as well as a reason in the Comments!
To review, here are the 2010 Denver Broncos Draft PIcks -
| Round | Pos. | Player | School |
| 1(22) | WR | Demaryius Thomas | Georgia Tech |
| 1(25) | QB | Tim Tebow | Florida |
| 2(45) | OL | Zane Beadles | Utah |
| 3(80) | C | J.D. Walton | Baylor |
| 3(87) | WR | Eric Decker | Minnesota |
| 5(137) | CB | Parrish Cox | Oklahoma St. |
| 6(183) | OL | Eric Olsen | Notre Dame |
| 7(225) | CB | Syd'Quan Thompson | Cal |
| 7(232) | LB | Jammie Kirlew | Indiana |
195 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't see how you could consider this draft anything but an "A"
The Broncos did not ignore a single need on draft day, significantly improved the running game, and got great, high character prospects with toughness and versatility.
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 26, 2010 6:58 AM MDT reply actions 2 recs
Sorry
I guess it’s draft “weekend” now. PS, the new format was awesome
A vision without a plan is just a dream. A plan without a vision is drudgery. But a vision with a plan can change the world.
by Sayre Bedinger on Apr 26, 2010 6:59 AM MDT up reply actions
It's here to stay unfortunately
I did like the break between rounds 1 & 2 though. The rating were ‘huge’ so expect them to continue the 3-day format.
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
Agreed
I watched as much as I could from Germany, but starting at 2am Friday morning and Saturday morning again is tough. However, the draft is still really only for serious fans and will never draw people who don’t watch the sport. The format proved successful and will be a main stay in the future.
"Truth only reveals itself when one gives up all preconceived ideas." -- Shoseki
More Like Anything But an A
Brilliant Rd 1, then the electric slide took over. Hope Tebow works out. I liked him in college, but got worn out by all the carping about him. Beadles was a good pick but a reach in 2 and they missed out on some good choices. Not getting either Jacoby Ford or Trindon Holiday in the late rounds really hurt, especially Ford because he went to the Raiders. Ugh. Decker, Walton and E. Olsen were good picks. Missed some good defense picks early on. I gave it a B.
by opinion8r on Apr 26, 2010 7:25 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
The only area that they did ignore...
was the front 7. Could of got more beef and speed. Could of not traded so much and still got Thomas and Tebow.
You can only carry so many guys on the front 7
Having picked up 4 in free agency, what this should tell you is the Broncos are happy with Chris Baker, Marcus Thomas, Mario Haggans, and Robert Ayers (and, to a lesser extend, Pedescleaux, who is still a year away because of injury).
by JeffG on Apr 26, 2010 8:58 AM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
This could be because he went to IR last year
I’ve seen that floated as an explanation that doesn’t have him being cut outright.
by BroncosBassist on Apr 26, 2010 9:15 AM MDT up reply actions
He went on IR, I believe.
Powell was resigned to take his place.
McD also said that they are happy with Baker's development and expect him to get substantial plaing time this coming season
It all starts with the lines
That's great!
Another guy who can make good on his tremendous upside? I’m sensing a theme here.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Apr 26, 2010 3:08 PM MDT up reply actions
Absolutely
One of the things that I’m enjoying the most is watching the systems for team building. It’s fascinating – and Baker is a very hopeful sign.
It all starts with the lines
so great
that he has an opportunity to learn from J-Will. That will be a nice legacy to pass on in Orange and Blue — specially when he can dish it out to the Dolts!
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Apr 27, 2010 8:15 PM MDT up reply actions
Agree on the first trade up
I would have been happy with either Dez Bryant or Thomas, so the trade up seemed pointless to me. I hope I am proved wrong over the next few years…
Still got your Creedence...
by OutOfYourElement on Apr 26, 2010 9:10 AM MDT up reply actions
they traded up because they were worried both would get taken
by black_knight101 on Apr 26, 2010 9:41 AM MDT up reply actions
I thought they traded up
because they liked Thomas better than Bryant and were afraid Dallas might, too.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
Take Tebow out of the equation
and look at the drafted players. If Tebow were “raptured” tomorrow, this would have been a very good draft for the Broncos.
by John in Castle Rock on Apr 26, 2010 9:16 AM MDT up reply actions
Rick Gosselin Dallasnews.com
“DENVER BRONCOS GRADE: A
The Broncos had the best third round of this draft. Walton can do at center for Josh McDaniels’ Broncos what Tom Nalen did for Mike Shanahan’s Broncos, and Decker will remind the Denver faithful of Ed McCaffrey."
by John in Castle Rock on Apr 26, 2010 10:13 AM MDT up reply actions
Way too early to tell
Anyone who can really grade a draft like this has either a functioning crystal ball or has built a time machine…that said, I think an ‘A’ would imply they got highly skilled players that filled needs the team had and were taking at or better than the players perceived value (in other words no “reaches”)….not sure we hit the mark on all those criteria.
I think as the entire draft wound down, the Broncos did manage to address some holes, but you could argue that they might have been better served by taking an even better player to address that need (meaning pick him earlier)….the reason I was not fond of the Tebow pick is that it did not address a need (a team with 3 QB’s does not really need a fourth) and Tebow was probably taken too early given his perceived value…now, in 3 years, this pick may have evolved into a genius pick…or we may have given up on the Tebow experiment…no one knows…so this grade will be revaluated year to year.
I really think they should have focused on building their offensive line with top tier talent (like the Niners did) and perhaps bolster their run defense….to some extent they dealt with those issues in the later rounds, but doesn’t that imply that they might have settled for lesser talent?
The Tebow pick had the impact (unsure if good or bad) of putting the Broncos on the national radar…they will surely get more national games going forward, and if the prime time schedule was redrawn today, I bet they would slide into more games….but I do get the sense that many in the national media are hoping they are filming a train wreck and that Tebow flames out…
In the end, almost regardless of anything else, this draft will rise or fall in value along wiht the fortunes of Tebow and McDaniels in concert…if this match works, then they will be annointed brillliant….and if not it will be “remember that young guy who used to coach the Broncos…what was his name again?”
What if you don't know Jack....but Jack knows you?
by Hugo Norton on Apr 26, 2010 10:46 AM MDT up reply actions
Good, objective criteria
like the way you clearly laid out your reasoning, and largely agree.
A point of disagreement… all teams that don’t already have one have a “need” for a potential all-pro caliber QB, and Tebow with fixed mechanics qualifies for that “position”. The problem with Tebow is that for all his high upside, his risk is huge because we don’t know if he can fix his mechanics. Tebow with good mechanics is a sure-fire #1 pick, which we got for #25 pick value… so basically we felt he had 24-picks worth of risk… whether that is too much or too little is a subjective value judgement.
How you rate the Tebow pick is all about your perception of the risk and the comparitive opportunity costs, because I don’t think anyone really doubts that his upside is as good as any player in the draft. For this reason, I think Tebow could bust and it not be the end of the world for McD… it was a gamble for a pick, but an educated one.
I generally like the rest of the draft, felt we reached a bit, but we filled needs with high-quality players. I thought we overpaid for Tebow given his bust risk (even though I also doubt he’d have been around in the 2nd for us to wait), but not hugely so and am fine with taking small risks for big upside occassionally.
Overall I give it a B due to the reaching for Beadles, and undervalued risk in Tebow… but thats not saying I would have necessarily done anything different because I don’t mind the gamble, and Beadles may not have been there later so even if he was a reach, he may not have been a poor choice.
nice call on Tebow!
that was incredible how you called Mcd trading up to get Tebow in the first round! I thought he was a 2nd rounder myself. McD probably could have waited until the 2nd round and still kept those 3 picks we gave to the Ravens! But Nonetheless, you predicted it before it happened. I haven’t seen that very often.
LB was not addressed in the draft and it was our #2 need.
Should have done better here but gave too many picks away.
I don't agree that LB was our #2 need
I mean we’ve got a starting four of Doom, Haggan, DJ, and Ayers. I don’t see anyone they bring in competing for a starting spot. Reid is a great back-up, Woodyard is undervalued by a lot of people because of some bad plays at the end of the season that really cost us. Larsen will do great in a pinch, Braxton is known only by the coaches at this point. So really you’re looking at our 7th or 8th stringer.
I’m all for upgrading but I argues against McClain because I didn’t think we needed a linebacker and I stand by that. (Mostly because I’m right so seldom that I have to.)
by Fan in Exile on Apr 26, 2010 5:48 PM MDT up reply actions
I would Give it a B
While I’m not the most knowledgable of observers…..
I do still have a slightly educated opinion, and my opinion is that we did a very good job in this draft. We addressed many of our needs, especially those that were not addressed in the offseason already.
If the guys we chose stay healthy (i.e. decker and cox) then I would probably move my grade up to an A, if they don’t obviously my grade is lowered, so to average the unknown I will stick to the B grade for now. I enjoy almost every single one of our picks, but I don’t know anything about kirlew. if he turns out to be a very good LB then my grade goes up even more.
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
B for pretty much the same reasons
Two players coming off injury…both foot injuries….is my primary reason but there is a bit of an unknown with Tibow as well. Personally, I’m wondering if McDaniels isn’t thinking a bit of a paradigm shift for how he’s used. McDaniels appears to be the type that revels in thinking out of the box. I could see Tibow lining up with Orton as a running back/second quarterback. Can’t you just picture a quick pitch to Tibow giving him the option to run or pass? I mean a 240 lb back with speed, power, AND the ability to throw WELL on the run? I’m liking the potential but am grading B until it is realized.
I’ll tell ya one thing though, I CANNOT wait until training camp!!!!!!!!!!
"Peace, a journey without distance to a place we have never left."
by BroncoCUbuffs on Apr 26, 2010 10:38 AM MDT up reply actions
Me neither!! and I am not sure I like the idea of Him
playing H-back this year mostly becuase the focus is supposed to be on his mechanics, and making him a pocket passer. I think he is MOST dangerous for the future as a pocket QB with the AMAZING ability to run.
putting him in now opens him up to early injury, and makes him try and learn two to three positions at once. I say stick him at QB and leave him there till he has mastered the playbooks.
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Alva Edison
"Success is not a place at which one arrives, but rather... the spirit with which one undertakes and continues the journey."
- Alex Noble
I see quite a few votes already but no comments...
I suppose everybody’s opinions are already out there… Oh there goes your comment Sayre… yep, everybody’s opinions here are already known. lol
I can’t go an A simply on the Tebow pick and the # of offensive picks. You no need was ignored? If you call picking up some defenders very late in the draft as seriously addressing the defense… I beg to differ. (last time I differed with you I was proven wrong, I look forward to the same here) And Wide Receiver? Aside from you (who certainly read McX right) not many folks were wishing for two WRs and a QB early!
But we did ok on the O-line by the looks of it and the defense certainly was addressed in free agency…I’ll admit it’s true that even I’m getting caught up in the hype and I so want to believe in the McX plan… but I’m still a show me guy. I’ll be patient and hope to God they do show me!
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
C+ with an option for extra credit if we continue via free agency
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. -D.A.
by Whidbey Bronco on Apr 26, 2010 7:18 AM MDT up reply actions
B
I think we did a pretty good job. Our offensive line and the depth of it just changed dramatically.
We started last year:
Clady, Hamilton, Wiegman, Kuper, Harris
Clady, Hochstein, Wiegman, Kuper, Polumbus
We got rid of Hamilton and Wiegman, never using last years selection Seth Olsen [which concerns me].
Now we have:
D’Anthony Batiste, Ryan Clady, Dustin Fry, Ryan Harris, Russ Hochstein, Chris Kuper, Matt McChesney, Seth Olsen, Tyler Polumbus
And added in the draft / UDFA:
Zane Beadles
JD Walton
Eric Olsen
Chris Marinelli, Michael Shumard, Paul Duncan
The part that worries me is spending a 2nd on Beadles and having him not start, same with whoever our center is going to be — I would hope he is someone we drafted, whether that is Walton or Olsen. I like the amount of competition we will have for those slots.
We needed some WR help after our game time performances last year. Stokley is almost done and Eddie dropped off the planet last year. Brandon Lloyd has never been anything in the league and Gaffney, while having a good game against the Chiefs, isn’t a #1.
I wanted ILB assistance and it turns out we got Akin Ayodele instead of drafting someone. The draft didn’t have much in the way of natural 3-4 ILB’s so I am fine going this route. Haggan has already been transitioning to the middle this offseason anyway, apparently.
Seems to me McDaniels
doesn’t get caught up in the “they must produce NOW based on where they were selected” game. Fortunately, he has an owner who is patient and recognizes that certain positions take time to develop.
Quinn, Olsen, and Smith from last year’s draft had a year to essentially watch and learn (while getting their feet wet a bit). Ayers was eased into his role, and played a lot batter, in my opinion, than our local press gives him credit for. They see the lack of sacks. I see a guy who was routinely getting pressure and, as the year progressed, setting the edge.
McD must have seen the same thing, which is why he’s moving Haggan to ILB, where I’m hoping he excels. He certainly has the size — and if he could cover as an OLB, he should be able to do it from the middle when he has to.
It has a good beat, I can dance to it, I gave it a B
My only objections are a lack of an ILB, and I still think we pulled the trigger on Tebow and Beadles a little too soon. Love the Beadles pick, Tebow is starting to grow on me, kinda like a fungus.
It's funny. Almost NOBODY loved these picks. If I would have mocked this draft, I'd have been laughed at!
But we’ve begun to really believe in McX and we’re wanting to believe so badly that these picks are beginning to look really good as well. I gotta say that it’s pretty damn likely our front office has a better idea than i do as to what we need. (but there are a thousand out of work coaches and GMs who were believed in)
So just in case it is a fungus… I’ll stick to my ideas of how it should have been for just a bit longer!!
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. -D.A.
by Whidbey Bronco on Apr 26, 2010 7:24 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I graded B
I like it that we addressed needs, but much will ride on success of Beadles and one of our centers. Sure we drafted 2, but it is nothing like a guarantee that one of them will work out. We’d drafted centers 2 previous years as well – both are gone without leaving a trace.
I gave it a B.....
Though close to an A.
This could be a FRANCHISE changing draft IF the risk/reward guys we took in the 1st round are as good as I HOPE they will be.
Beadles is my favorite player, with Walton and Cox next.
Beadles is a beast, will be our guard and will bring NASTINESS to our line.
I HAZARD EVERYONE TO BE PATIENT WITH THE TEAM… this is a drfat to set us up for the next 2/3 years. Its i unrealistic to think all these rookies will come in and be GAME CHANGERS. McD will blood them…..to set them up for success in the next 2-3 seasons.
If we can blood some rookies, our D line can improve and we can start rotating in guys like Baker, and we see some improvements from guys like Thomas, Smith, Cox, Decker at end of the season I will be stoked.
Hope that Orton plays lights out….as I know McD will give him the opportunity to find that pay day with another program.
If we can go 8-8 or 9-7, have rookies from the last 2 seasons play some key roles….I will be stoked!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
Boydy
I’m not sure why everyone wants to write off Orton. He is the starter(like it or not) and a better player than some give him credit for being. Scenario for your consideration. What if he comes in plays the lights out you hope for and we make the playoffs? Do we let him go to start Tebow/Quinn and start all over?
No...and it could happen Richard...
I LOVE kyle Orton….most under rated player…and I mean PLAYER…..in the NFL.
My gut is that McD will sign him this off season on a 2-3 year deal……pay him some good money but also give him a clause to get out if:
1/ Tebow develops fast.
2/ Kyle has the opportunity to get a BIG multi year deal with another club.
I HONESTLY think that McD is a HUGE KO supporter, and will do anything he can (with out hurting the Broncos) to further his career.
Thanks RC!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
by boydy2669 on Apr 26, 2010 7:33 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think that IS what is going to happen
Kyle’s ready to blossom, and we as fans are going to have a happy problem, but it makes no sense to get rid of the big “O”.
With Orton
We’re going to end up trading him to Chicago for 2 firsts and a third – They’re in need a good QB.
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
Touche Darin!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
pow zing
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Apr 26, 2010 11:44 AM MDT up reply actions
Its a business
I really think you are over stating the love between Orton and McD….there is a looming lockout next season….and with the Tebow pick, McDaniels has made the statement that he is planting his flag elsewhere, and given all the media stuff, and hype and lightning rod stuff that Tebow brings, McDaniels makes it work with Tebow or pays the price…..and Orton is left out of that equation….that is why the Tebow pick so early carried so much baggage…if he had been picked in the late 2nd round or early third, the pressure would be off both Tebow and his coach….but to take him so early and jump through so many hoops to make it happen, just turned up the heat on t he process and will force it to come to a boil perhaps too soon….
And Orton has to change a lot of minds this season…there are many like your self who love Orton and admire his work ethic, intelligence etc. and there are also many who have yet to be so moved…I myself see a player of some talent, lacking in mobility (perhaps due to injury) and unable to really carry a team with big plays of his own making…..a KEY ingredient in QB greatness I believe. I am still waiting to fall in love, and make myself available to do so each and every weekend during football season!
What if you don't know Jack....but Jack knows you?
I sure hope McD goes out of his way to let KO know just how much of a supporter he is!
A QB controversy this year could REALLY throw a wrench into the works!
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. -D.A.
by Whidbey Bronco on Apr 26, 2010 7:40 PM MDT up reply actions
Beadles was a shock at where he was picked but...
… it was basically the same concept pick as someone like Ducasse who many in MHR supported. An OT/OG type – cover for Harris if needed but can play left OG.
It was just a matter of getting your head around whether he was value or not and quite frankly, there’s 31 other teams out there – how do we know if he would or wouldn’t have been taken if we traded down??
"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes" Douglas Adams
by orange&blue_aussie on Apr 26, 2010 9:03 AM MDT up reply actions
along with some key roles filled by rookies... for the arrow to be pointed up I'd expect the QB situation to be resolved as well. (in two years)
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. -D.A.
by Whidbey Bronco on Apr 26, 2010 7:37 PM MDT up reply actions
I gave it an A
Just because I love my Broncos and I have no idea how any of these draft picks will work out. And neither do you.
What a drag it is getting old. - Mick
Touche!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
I was actually directing that comment to everybody. Not just you boydy.
What a drag it is getting old. - Mick
B
Although I love the Tebow pick, I thought we gave a little to much for the move. I also hoped we would address ILB sooner than we did. Must be patient!
GO BRONCOS
Tough times don't last.......Only tough people!
B
for me its hard to see how at this point we deserve and A. I like to see what happens with the players and then i make a final decision. I do feel we did a good job addressing issues such as our Oline and therefore running game. however, I feel we could have added a SS or an ILB to really help or defense out.
"To all the critiques, thank you for the motivation… because it has been an edge for me and will continue to be an edge for me" - Tim 'the Mile High Messiah' Tebow
by David G. Little on Apr 26, 2010 7:26 AM MDT reply actions
B for me
Without Tebow its an A. At the moment, all I can see is the risk associated with that pick.
Not meant as a slight on Tim or Josh but it was a risk and all I wanted from the draft was a simple draft with no shocks or controversy.
I give it an A
We got the best pass catching WR in the draft (Decker), we got the best, IMO, Center in the draft (Walton) and we got a beast of an OL who can play all the positions (Beadles). Thomas has good hands and is the best blocking WR in the draft. And Cox has first round talent.
I think the upgrades to our DL via free agency will have a positive effect on our LBers.
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
Walton best center in the draft?
Over Pouncey? Really?
by si_ice on Apr 26, 2010 9:39 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Watch the Baylor Nebraska tape if you can find it.
when Walton matched up with Suh he held his own and then some. Suh is a freak of nature but Walton is downright nasty…
"as in football so in life"
Sorry, I saw the rerun on the big 12 cable channel
I don’t know if a link exists.
"as in football so in life"
Yes, Yes
I had this torrent uploaded for a long time, along with D.Morgans GT games. It sold me on Walton.
Bear Claw Chris Lapp: You've come far pilgrim.
Jeremiah Johnson: Feels like far.
Bear Claw Chris Lapp: Were it worth the trouble?
Jeremiah Johnson: What trouble?
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 26, 2010 11:54 AM MDT up reply actions
Seriously, yes
Pouncey didn’t make the line calls at Florida and mostly worked out of the shotgun, he’s got some work to do.
Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960
McD himself said that they had Pouncey rated higher
by black_knight101 on Apr 26, 2010 12:17 PM MDT up reply actions
I gave it a C...
…largely because I’d enjoy one seasonal phase where I don’t have to buckle on my chin strap to wade through the Bronco mocking and venom pretty much every where.
I think it was outstanding starting at Decker, but the first round through Walton have huge boom/bust potential, and although I’ve warmed up to Beadles (mostly because I have to), I think he was an epic reach. I understand the value-to-the team concept, but he seems like a guy that probably could have been there as late as Cox’s slot. With locker room leader and academic All American (ergo a guy with a similar intangible package ) John Asamoah on the board, I just don’t understand the pick.
Denialists replace the open-minded skepticism of science with the inflexible certainty of ideological commitment.-- Michael Spector
by PredominantlyOrange on Apr 26, 2010 7:28 AM MDT reply actions
i can explain the Beadles pick over Asamoah
It must be that McD rated Beadles above Asamoah. I’d say rating JD Walton top center in the draft (above on this board, not by McD), over Pouncey, is clearly a stretch. But on Asamoah vs Beadles I see how opinions and evaluations may differ.
by si_ice on Apr 26, 2010 8:21 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Its not that I don't...
…trust McX to know the better fit. They obviously liked Beadles better, and they obviously know better than me. I like everything I’ve read about the player. I just wonder if he wouldn’t have lasted a couple more rounds. I say that knowing I’m probably affording the draftniks too much credibility on this one.
Here’s hoping he works out just like the OT NE selected last year, who everybody (the ’niks) agreed was an epic reach, yet who worked his way into the starting line up in short order.
Denialists replace the open-minded skepticism of science with the inflexible certainty of ideological commitment.-- Michael Spector
by PredominantlyOrange on Apr 26, 2010 8:43 AM MDT up reply actions
B
I love the Thomas pick. His route running can improve, but he is a monster athlete who has the ability to block, as well. I have been watching Tim Tebow videos for the last three days and I have a hard time believing that this guy is going to be denied. We are talking about HOF effort. Whether or not the HOF talent comes with it remains to be seen, but I certainly believe he will be a starting QB in a year or two.
I’m sure everyone is familiar with the phrase “Will your team to victory”. Tebow is one of those guys.
This draft may look ……. meh…. to a bunch of you right now and that’s perfectly acceptable. However, I really like that we stacked the depth on the offensive line. That was something that needed to be addressed, right away, and we did it.
I’m giving it a B for now, but it certainly has potential to boost to an A in the next year or two.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
KB
Tebow has a long way to go, and people have short memories when it comes to inexperienced QBs. Do you remember Elway lining up behind guard in ’83? Those kinds of things will happen with Tebow too, especially reading defenses, when the bullets fly for real.
That's fair.
I’m not saying there won’t be growing pains. I will say that he has unparalleled effort, though. In this age of the NFL, when you have guys like Drew Brees and Peyton Manning watching film 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, you want a guy who will put in the extra effort like that to be great. Tim isn’t just going to just close up shop after he makes a mistake. He’s a football player.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 26, 2010 8:07 AM MDT up reply actions
Giving an accurate grade before the games are played is so impossible
But it’s McDaniels, so it’s obviously an F-.
/sarcasm
I think you mean "McIdiot", right? lol
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 26, 2010 7:41 AM MDT up reply actions
Yep.."McDouche, ididotpants, pats undercover spy trying to singlehandedlywreck the whole broncos franchise" guy!
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
Yep...fire him now!...or at least HE should pay to coach the Broncos....HAHAHAHA.
Those that cant coach, compete!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.
All I want is 53 Rod Smiths. Is that asking too much????
"Peyton Hillis didn’t rip the sleeves off his jersey, they flew off out of fear."
Calijoefornia.
You guys have been listening to Armstrong and Shapiro, haven't you
McDaniels is clearly in way over his head.
That he got two of the best values in the draft in Decker and Cox? Happy accident that McDopey mcblundered into.
Incidentally, the grades I’ve been seeing on the Broncos draft are mostly good to middling. McShay gave them tops in the division; Kiper bottom of the division (C-) — but that was largely based on the Tebow pick.
Wow
I liked our draft, but KC and Oakland did pretty well by themselves. I’d say we were second behind the chiefs.
by BroncosBassist on Apr 26, 2010 9:23 AM MDT up reply actions
Of course,
that is likely to change if Tebow turns out to be the next great NFL QB.
by BroncosBassist on Apr 26, 2010 9:24 AM MDT up reply actions
they were listening to me after the Cutler trade!
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. -D.A.
by Whidbey Bronco on Apr 26, 2010 7:41 PM MDT up reply actions
B+
If Tebow pans out the way I hope it’s an A+… Absolutely see the method to the maddness of McD.. Established veteran leadership drafting replacments right behind them. I think they chose Beadles in the 2nd round because he fits the Patriot mold and the Patriots had 3 2nd rounders. Eric Decker might be a true steal. He is incredibly bright and gifted. Can’t wait to see Decker, Thomas and Royal in the slot and Tebow running and gunning (Tebow a year wait likely but a man can dream). Wish the season started next month.
I thought they drafted fine
but I’m already exhausted from trying to defend Tebow’s pro potential. And what happens if Quinn does enough to keep him on the bench? There were more pressing needs.
I’m a University of Utah grad, so seeing a kid like Beadles join the Broncos gives me extra pleasure.
B ...
I’m definitely feeling better about the Tebow pick now than I was at first blush, but we could have put ourselves in position to draft both Iupati and Pouncey, which I think would result in a better OL than we have drafted, and still allowed us to get Gerhardt to team with Moreno as well as Decker. I’m becoming a big proponent of the nasty, run-it-down-your-throat style of offense, especially since defenses seem to be trending towards lighter and faster. As some else wrote on this board last week, the leader of the pack is usually the one willing to step out of the box first. With that OL, those two RB, and a serviceable passing game, I think we could be quite competitive.
All that said, I certainly have a lot more faith in McX and their football knowledge than I do my own (duh) – or, with all do respect, the collective ‘yours’. As I look at the draft and the way it actually played out with the picks we had, there’s really only one pick I thought might have been a mistake – Beadles over John Jerry. On the other hand, it’s hard to argue with picking a smart, hard working overachiever rather than a bigger talent with a variable motor.
Either way, I for one am very happy that this franchise has made the changes it has made over the past two years, and I’m more excited to see what the next few seasons have in store for us than I have been in quite some time.
projecting into the future
…. a mobile QB with an underrated arm (Tebow has good arm strength, as the tweaks in his delivery are starting to reveal) getting outside the pocket and throwing to a pair of 6’3" receivers to set up underneath crosses to Royal… Hell, Thomas may not have to learn to run routes. Just find open spots and then go get the ball when it’s thrown up.
Let's start with the proviso that day-after draft grade are meaningless
I gave it a B. I didn’t like the Tebow pick (although I am open to persuasion). But here’s the thing: Take him out of the mix, and they still picked a 1st, a 2nd, two 3rds, etc. Tebow is only the legacy of this draft for media professionals who need things to write about.
Individual player thoughts:
Demaryius Thomas: When you read scouting reports and look at good WR prospects who struggle in the NFL, one recurrent problem is that they can’t beat press coverage. The reports on Thomas say he destroys press coverage. OK, then. Oh, and the complaints about his long-yardage catches coming from short routs and runs after the catch and bubble screens…. Well, I know a good fit when I see one.
Tim Tebow: Like my favorite TV personality, I’m looking for somebody to talk me down. Ted Bartlett thinks he’ll succeed, and soon. But so does Woody Paige. I guess the jury’s still out?
Zane Beadles: I like the part where he can (will) play tackle when Ryan Harris gets injured. Tyler Polumbus hurt my eyes.
J.D. Walton: Sure, I like big centers who play hard and don’t get pushed backward 5 yards at the start of every play.
Eric Decker: This is why I was thrilled to trade Brandon Marshall for two 2nd-round picks. Good possession receivers can be found relatively easily. I think McDaniels was giving a personal shout-out/wink to me when he said Thomas, the field-stretcher, reminded him of Marshall. Decker is Marshall’s replacement. Plus, he reminds me of Ed McCaffrey — even though he doesn’t run deep routes? Er, he reminds me of Steve Watson. Or maybe Luke Skywalker or Gordon Gekko or the Arcade Fire. It’s totally not OK to compare this guy to slot receivers like Jason Avant, even if he ends up playing the slot.
Parrish Cox: If he works out as a returner, that alone justified the pick. Plus, another body in the pipeline at a thin position. Psyched.
Eric Olsen: Meh. I thought the draft-via-carpet-bombing-a-position strategy exited with Shanny. Can’t argue with any of the individual picks. But boy, the team is thin at OLB if something happens to Doom or Ayers. Another running back would be nice. Or a back-up tackle. You’re sure nobody fitting the bill could be found here?
Syd’Quan Thompson: I wish they never picked this guy, because some enterprising writer will soon use his short/slow description to bring up the Alphonso Smith trade. Again. In all seriousness, why draft this guy when Bailey, Goodman, Smith, Jones, Cox + Carter already = 6 cornerbacks, one more than the team is likely to keep? You know who I would have liked here? Zoltan Mesko.
Jammie Kerlew: I just complained about the OLB position, so I guess I have to shut up, even if very few good things ever come from Indiana (sorry, HT — state pride).
Interesting positional battles coming up. I guess we’ll learn about Kenny McKinley in training camp. If he’s made any improvements, I bet he’ll make the roster over Stokely. I’ll vote that Brandstater makes the team over Quinn, that Carter and Thompson get cut as DBs, and that Wink is sold on Chris Baker.
by Chibronx on Apr 26, 2010 8:32 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I agree.
However, Zoltan wasn’t available with the Syd’Quan Thompson pick. I wish he was, but those dirty Patriots took him….
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 26, 2010 8:37 AM MDT up reply actions
Thanks for the correction. The Pats’ 5 7th-round picks proved very valuable in a deep draft. They basically got to go to the front of the line for UDFAs, and a lot of those guys will work out this year.
Yeah... and Zoltan....
I wanted Zoltan really bad…..
Yet another reason to hate the patriots. No offense Mrs. Guru.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
PS3 ID: broncomaniac6
by Troy Hufford on Apr 26, 2010 8:47 AM MDT up reply actions
Kind of looks like Chris Baker is money for the NT position.
I kind of figured something was up when they took him off of the PS and put him on the roster, I’m beginning to think we are pretty set with every position.
McD said that in his press conference
which makes me pretty happy for Baker.
by Fan in Exile on Apr 26, 2010 8:40 AM MDT up reply actions
Was that the last one? I haven't got to hear it yet. Thanks...
Oh yeah, the valuable tutoring he’ll get from Jamal Williams will be money too…Sweet!
I figured something was up when
Marcus Thomas announced he was losing weight to play DE. Baker figures to be a good one at NT, IMO.
-
BILLY THOMPSON GOT SHAFTED!!
Great comment man...
I agree with most everything you said with the exception of Decker. I’ve only seen about two minutes of a you tube video of the guy and within the first two seconds I could tell he’s a real high-motor type player getting by an almost pure grit and determination. I like the Eddie Mac and Win Buter comparisons, but I see him as more of a Kevin Walter or Greg Camarillo type early on in his career, but I think we could be looking at a Steve Largent body of work out of this guy.
I also just read your Tebow post and busted my gut. I must have missed it this weekend.
Won't bow. Don't know how.
He’s kind of like Tony Scheffler — who’s totally not atheltic and just a high-motor guy — with some Toby Gerhart and Scott Podsednik thrown in. Also, he remindes me of Stephen Hawking — but with better athletic skills.
How is Treme? I don’t have cable, and have to wait to see it.
I really like Treme
We’re only three or four episodes in, but the characters and story lines are developing nicely. The base material he’s working with here— struggling musicians, disaster recovery, Mardi Gras Indian culture— is not as riveting as cops, drugs and gangsters, but Simon’s dialog, attention to detail, and willingness to develop characters that you can’t pigeon-hole as “good” or “bad” are all in full effect here. I’m still waiting for a “Wallace” moment, and I’m not sure if we will see it or should see it, but it is David Simon we’re talking about here. In its infancy, I’m fairly certain it’s the best show on TV right now not named “Mad Men”.
Oh, and the music is great. Growing up in MT, NOLA-style jazz music and Zydeco were not really on my radar and I haven’t really gotten into it in the past, but I’m absolutely loving it in Treme.
Won't bow. Don't know how.
by ButteBronco on Apr 26, 2010 10:45 AM MDT up reply actions
Re: Syd'Quan
read somewhere that he is actually pretty fast / quick — but that he had some injury when he was running his 40.
So I’m holding off on the slow / short thing until I see otherwise.
ran with a hammie injury
Bear Claw Chris Lapp: You've come far pilgrim.
Jeremiah Johnson: Feels like far.
Bear Claw Chris Lapp: Were it worth the trouble?
Jeremiah Johnson: What trouble?
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 26, 2010 11:38 AM MDT up reply actions
Since grading picks that haven't even participated in a camp is meaningless...
How about grading last years draft? I give it a D!
At 12 we could have picked Orakpo or Cushing (I remember seeing more than a few mocks with us taking him). I like Knowshon but he probably falls to 18, but hey if he doesn’t Beanie Wells is there or Maualuga or even Harvin because we love Urban Meyer’s players soooo much!
Ayers? Really? Didn’t seem horrible at the time but he has looked like a 3rd-4th rounder. http://profootballfocus.com/by_player.php?tab=by_player&season=2009&page=2&surn=A&playerid=4941
Don’t trade for Alphonso because that trade was horrific! We could have had Tebow without giving up 3 picks this year. While you are at it, don’t trade for Richard Quinn because second round tight ends should have more than 0 catches and 1 special teams tackle. Plus he probably still would have been there at 79th (& you keep the 84th??).
McBath was solid for a rookie, I like the pick. Brandstater looked good in the preseason and Bruton played well the one week he was in. But overall everyone was underwhelming.
I know hind sight is 20/20 and situations on teams are different but I really think we missed and made big time mistakes, oh well still I give it a D.
Let me know what you guys think!
If the moon were made of spare ribs would you eat it?
Yes, we are all geniuses
once we know who everybody chose and how all those rookies played.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
I think
That as you say, hindsight is 20/20 and these kinds of woulda coulda shoulda exercises are pretty meaningless.
by AllBroncsallday on Apr 28, 2010 2:25 PM MDT up reply actions
one year is not enough to judge a player (especially a rookie)
prime example Mario Williams first year 4 sacks…not really great
since then he’s average 11 and been pretty dominant.
Look at Eddie Royal 1st year 91 rec’s 980 yards 5 td’s awesome year
2nd year 37 rec’s 345 yards and 0 td’s Mediocre at best.
But as a Denver fan you know there is more to Royal’s story. New coach, new offense, new QB, addtional roles (returning etc), Royal can still end up being great (and I hope he does) but he can also end up getting cut like any other player.
It was the most memorable draft I have watched in years.
The last memorable draft for me was 1983 and what went on shortly after. I graded the overall draft a B. If you profile the players we got almost all of them have a degree or academic honors, smart, versatile and tough. The choreography of the draft especially round 1 I give an A+ for the moves McDX put on other teams, that was brilliant tactical strategy. Turning the Jay Cutler draft pick into 2 great prospects for the future of this franchise. Whether they turn out to be any good or not we won’t know for at least a couple of years, but at the moment it looks good.
We’re kind of like political journalists — we can’t/won’t judge outcomes and merits, so we can weigh in heavily on tactics. And in terms of tactics, it seems like they’ve pulled off the plan masterfully: Take a few over-valued assets, flip them for picks, move up and down the board, pay as little as you can for the guys you want.
The clearest improvement in this team post-Shanny is depth. Three years ago, I only looked for good starters at each position — back-ups were an after-thoughts. Now we look and see a few guys in line all over the field (although I’m still nervous about DE and LB). It’s just awesome.
I think that's the beauty of this FA.
Picking up the 3 J’s in FA will not give the necessary upgrade to the front 3 but will also create a learning tool for the youngsters, Marcus Thomas, Ryan McBean and Baker. I was shocked that we didn’t pick up any depth there, but again, I trust Wink/McDX know what they are doing. I can’t armchair them…
Agree totally with these comments as well...
The depth of McD’s roster purge is quite something. I made a spreadsheet comparing the 2008 and 2009 post training camp depth charts for a fan post that I never got around to posting. I was just looking at that 2008 depth chart, and here are some fun facts.
1) There will only be 13 players from the Week 1 2008 roster going into the 2010 training camp— 13 of 80, or 16.25%
2) Of those 13 players, I project only seven will start (Clady, Kuper, Harris, Graham, Royal, DOOM, DJ)— 7/22 or 31%.
3) Of the remaining 6 players, three should make the team for sure (M. Thomas, Larsen, and Woodyard), and three will be on the roster bubble depending on how the rookies do (Polumbus, Moss, and Stokely).
4) If three of these reserves get cut, that would leave ten players from 2008 on the Week One 53 man roster— under 20%. Maybe 11 make it (Stokely most likely)— that would be just above 20%. Even if all make it, it’s still only 25%.
That’s a 75-80% roster turnover in two years. I’m not sure what is considered normal, but that has to be extreme. Plus, like you guys said, there is much better depth all over the roster. Some of the key reserves on the 2008 depth chart are doozies— Andre Hall, PJ Alexandar, Dylan Gandy, Keary Colbert, Darrell Jackson, Jamie Winborn, K2, Rodric Rodgers, Louis Green. The starters are even better— Selvin Young, John Engleberger, Nate Webster, Boss Baily, Marquand Manuel, Marlon McCree.
To me, this turnover has been remarkable, especially when compared to other franchises that have went through “rebuilding” and spend the better part of a decade at 4-12 or 6-10, drafting in the top five each year. The Denver Broncos are going through a complete purge, making rebuild seem euphemistic. Not only has McX turned-over 75-80% of the roster in two years, he shipped away some major pieces of the team and I don’t see the 4-12 run starting anytime too soon. Maybe I’m drinking the Koolaid, but with the depth added in FA and the draft this year, I see no worse than 8-8 this year. Perhaps if these last two very important drafts— with four first rounders and four second rounders over two drafts— fail miserably, then we could see a big slide, but I just don’t see that happening either (even if Tebow does bomb, which I see as likely).
Won't bow. Don't know how.
by ButteBronco on Apr 26, 2010 10:15 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yes I did.
Thank you. He would up the percentages slightly, but the numbers are still pretty big.
Won't bow. Don't know how.
by ButteBronco on Apr 26, 2010 10:24 AM MDT up reply actions
The most amazing thing to me is the quality depth. A couple years ago, if we had an injury the back up was a big drop in talent.
One other thing about the roster changes. Its a heck of a telling statistic when you let go a lot of starters and key backups all at once and a year later most of them are out of football. When your starters are not good enough to be picked up as experienced backups by any NFL team and are OOF, thats kinda self explanatory.
Obviously Shanahan had some reaches of his own and draft failures over the years that made depth in a lot of positions an issue, Even if the 2006 draft class was successful in Cutler Marshall and a good catching TE, there were a lot of bust drafts with the previous coaching regime.
One glaring is Dwayne Robertson aformer 4th overall pick in the 2004 draft...
I don’t know what he is doing now, but his play never really lived up to that pick.
Can I have a Pass/Fail option?
I agree with John’s statement: “Grading Draft picks before they go through one mini-camp practice is a bit ridiculous.”
I’d give McDaniels/Xanders a pass, if for no other reason than we walked into the draft with 6 picks and walked away with 9 draftees.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
I grade it a C, but "incomplete" is the best answer.....
My preference was getting the OL and WR shored up and for that the Broncos earned an A.
Little to no defense addressed, earned an F in my book.
Average that out and it gets a C.
I’m not sold on Tebow yet. My jaw hit the floor when he was taken. I have talked with one of the staff over the weekend and he was completely sold on the pick and thinks multiple championships will arrive in the future. (The amusing part is he is normally the negative one and I am the one I am trying to calm and convince.) Once I took in the Thomas pick, I liked it since it was not Dez Bryant and he has the same size as Marshall with better skill in stretching the field. I hope that Decker becomes a player like Ed McCaffrey, a tough player that will do anything to make a play.
I liked the picks to shore up the OL. All three look like beefy bruisers that will make the line a dominant force that I have been clamoring for since McD took over.
fader nation is a conquered nation
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!
CHICAGO...Where Quaterbacks' careers go to die!
I do see him as an issue....
he is not very mature and with him going to Dallas I’m not sure if they can mentor him well. I am glad it was Dallas and not us. We just got rid of a talented headache in Brandon Marshall so why would we want to bring on another one? That would not have made sense to me.
fader nation is a conquered nation
Jerry Jones is Al Davis with a smile!
CHICAGO...Where Quaterbacks' careers go to die!
I actually doubt
the character was the major factor. His 16 (I think my memory is right) on the Wonderlik seems more telling to me.
Rick Gosselin
Gave us an A for our draft. I think I’m pretty happy with how everything worked out.
I love the Thomas pick I think he makes the Bubble screens a real threat, and by the time he can run all the routes we’ll have a QB who can throw to him.
I like the Tebow pick because this is the type of risk that I want the team to take. I don’t like injury risks I don’t like character risks, but I like picking a guy who works hard, when what he needs to succeed is hard work.
I don’t see Beadles as the reach that others do, I think he will easily contribute the value of the 45th pick this year and in the years to come.
I think our third round was money. Decker is going to come in right away and it’s going to be easier for him, since he won’t be the focus of the offense.
I would be very comfortable with Walton starting I could be wrong on this, but I think that the offense he played in fits our offense much better than Pouncey’s would have. Not that I think he’s better but I think he’s better for us, because the experience is more important when you’re plugging two holes like we are.
Pouncey and Walton pretty much snapped to the QB in the shot gun the majority of the time.
I’m not sure if that matters or not, but I think McD got his center. Walton’s wonderlic was (29) and that is pretty smart. Walton stated that he hasn’t earned anything yet and certainly not the starting job at center. He said he would have to earn it (just take it!)…I believe our run game will get a lot better and Kuper better watch himself too or else he may be hitting the door. I just to win a MF’n game…
Bfree
When I wrote that I wasn’t thinking about the snapping position so much as what the guy is asked to do in making line reads and blocking after the snap.
by Fan in Exile on Apr 26, 2010 9:26 AM MDT up reply actions
Stokley called Decker after his injury to give some encouragement last year
Lisfranc: Minnesota’s Eric Decker suffered a Lisfranc injury late November, which has damaged his draft stock. But he received some encouragement in an unsolicited phone call last winter from Denver WR Brandon Stokley, who suffered the same type of foot injury. “He actually has had a better career since his injury,” Decker said. “That gave me the motivation and understanding that things happen for a reason, and I’m making the best of it.”
Stokley is maore valuable than most folks realize too...
After rewatching the Monday night game against SD last year, Stokley had to remind BMarsh at least 3 times to behave. I wonder who will make him behave in Miami?
lol Stokes will like it in Miami!
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. -D.A.
by Whidbey Bronco on Apr 26, 2010 7:42 PM MDT up reply actions
my thoughts...
As with all drafts we will have to wait and see. I don’t know much about the players beyond what I have read in many scouting sites. Some random thoughts:
1) I was a big fan of the moves to trade back in the first round. It was a good strategic move to stockpile picks, if the guy you want will be available later.
2) I think the Broncos could have shown more patience after moving back. Regardless of how you view Thomas and Tebow, it appears the Broncos didn’t have to move up that high to get them. Similarly, Beadles probably could have been gotten later.
3) What is clear from this and the last draft and other personnel decisions is that the Broncos frequently buck conventional wisdom. This means that either McDaniels and company are smarter than everyone else or they are being foolish. Given that they traded away a first round pick this year for Alphonso Smith last year, despite their own admission that they weren’t prepared for the draft, gives me some pause. I’m still hopeful, but I don’t yet have complete faith McDaniels/Xanders are smarter than the conventional thinking.
4) Is it me, or does it seem like the Broncos focus too narrowly on guys that they bring in to interview and/or work out?
5) There is way too much focus on Tebow. Even if he doesn’t work out, it isn’t like it is is a rarity when first round picks don’t work out. I think even if he ends up being a situational wild-cat QB, they still get more value out of him than half the guys taken in the first round.
6) I’ll probably get slammed here for this, but I expected Tebow to be more articulate in interviews than what I have heard from him.
couldn't agree more
There is way too much focus on Tebow. Even if he doesn’t work out, it isn’t like it is is a rarity when first round picks don’t work out.
I like most am excited by his upside. But to say that Josh McDaniels is tying his future to Tim Tebow or (as Cowherd said this morning) Tebow is being put in the unfair position of having to carry McDaniels on his back is just not accurate.
Kyle Orton still has my complete confidence as our starter until someone can come in and play better. I think the world of Tebow, and hope he’s the guy, but he is NOT the only road to a playoff run for our team.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Apr 26, 2010 11:56 AM MDT up reply actions
so I gave the draft an A
precisely because the guy we got with the tremendous character, attitude, and upside did not prevent us from upgrading the other glaring weaknesses on our team, which after free agency, IMO, were mainly OL and WR.
"All we're trying to do is win the *********** game!" -- Josh MF McDaniels tearing into his offensive line after three false starts in the red zone. The tirade turned the tide of the game, and the Broncos dominated from that point on.
by broncosmontana on Apr 26, 2010 11:59 AM MDT up reply actions
I’m still hopeful, but I don’t yet have complete faith McDaniels/Xanders are smarter than the conventional thinking.
Actually, I have little doubt about this anymore. Where did “conventional thinking” have us finishing last year… 4-12? Chicago? McD saw through that and traded away our pick rather than chicago’s, giving us more value than conventional wisdom.
I actually agree we reached a bit at times, but I have no doubt that McX is smarter than draftniks and “conventional thinking.”
Articulate? Really?
"To be honest, I will wear whatever number they want me to wear. If that's 15,
I'll wear 15. If that's 95, I'll wear 95. I don't really care, just as long as
I can wear a Denver Broncos jersey. That's my approach and my attitude."
TT 4/23/10
I'm not sure what you mean by your comment,
but I expected a little more given his grades and reputation, but thought he lapsed entirely into dull jock speak—John Elway, he’s not. I guess it might explain his Wunderlich (sp?) scores.
If you think about it, most NFL quarterbacks are more articulate than your average football player.
Way too early to grade, but I gave an A minus
Could’ve been a B+ as well, but hey…I’m a FAN!
We filled every position of need, and also drafted depth.
We have our KR/PR now…with secondary depth to boot.
Whether you like him or not, Tebow is more likely to be a hero than a goat, as long as we don’t try to change him too much. Plus he makes an IMMEDIATE upgrade on short yardage situations….just by being on the field. That was our biggest fault last year as an offense.
At WR we are now stacked to the gills with talent/size and speed…Decker alone would have filled our depth chart nicely, but Thomas’ potential is the moon!
Baker must be doing very well, because there was no trace of DT on the chart.
I believe that Decker, Thomas, Walton, Cox and Tebow (in limited scenarios) will all be on the field and have a positive impact this year….That’s a pretty good draft if you ask me!
"Brandon Marshall will be a happy BRONCO WR in 2010"
Broncotodd - 2009...Boy, was I wrong or what?
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
John Adams
In general, I like picks late in 1st round and 2nd
vs early. Given the potential for any pick to be a bust, atleast later picks aren’t getting the ridiculous salaries demanded in the top 15 of the draft… This will allow the Broncos to do a little more in free agency before all this is done.
I agree I was hoping for ILB help, but maybe it just wasn’t there. I’m very happy with the WR and OL picks, because I’m convinced our line suffered down the stretch. I’m still waiting to see who else Josh picks up in Free Agency for the defense.
B grade. A if Tebow pans out…
Still got your Creedence...
by OutOfYourElement on Apr 26, 2010 9:08 AM MDT reply actions
Somebody tell the draft graders about the fallacy of composition
Systems make a bit of a difference, but the draft is essentially a zero-sum game. Not everybody can draft good players. There are winners and losers by definition. For every A, there should be an F. Most people should get a C.
And yet the default grade in most draft reviews is “B”, and no more than 1-2 teams gets a D or an F. This is silly. You can’t all win. It’s like the time Bill Sapphire did a political odds column without making sure the odds summed to 1.
It's not a zero sum game at all.
You’ve got 300 hundred some odd guys who are all being added. No one is really being taken away from any team. (Although there’s an interesting philosophical question there that probably isn’t worth actually addressing.)
The draft is really pure addition to the NFL.
by Fan in Exile on Apr 26, 2010 9:28 AM MDT up reply actions
You’re right, the draft adds players to the pool. But the draft itself is a zero-sum game — there is one pool of players to pick from, and by picking a player, your team takes it away from another team. That’s zero-sum.
I would say that you’re looking at it the wrong way, especially when it comes to the draft grades. Every team should theoretically come out of the draft better than they were when they went in, which is not a zero sum game.
Even if two teams both want a DT, for example. One of them gets the five star guy and the next team can only get the four star guy they both got better. One should get an A and the other a B+
by Fan in Exile on Apr 26, 2010 9:45 AM MDT up reply actions
There's still a relative difference
Some teams will improve more, others less. The whole point of grading is to guesstimate how well teams did relative to each other, which is zero sum by definition. I’ve always felt that draftniks graded too high, as the range of grades usually runs overwhelmingly from A to C. B has become average.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
Sure
That’s why in my response I gave one team an A and the other a B+.
Now if you want to argue that people are to lax in their grades, that’s another topic entirely.
by Fan in Exile on Apr 26, 2010 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions
I think you're premice is way off.
Obviously, every team can’t get the best player, but every team can get players who improve their overall strengths/weaknesses from the previous season. I don’t believe grades are given out as as a comparison of how a particular team did against the other teams, but are given out to grade how well that team filled its needs based on where they were last season. Therefore, every team could potentially get an A (or an F).
By the way, I didn’t give a grade. I don’t follow college football at all, so I don’t know who any of these guys are, and I follow the Broncos more as a team, and don’t really follow any individual player’s stats/accomplishments.
I believe you all are missing something important
Although yes, one team gets the 5 star individual and another team gets the 4 star player, this does not mean that the team that drafted the 5 star should get the A and the other team should get the B. You forget the variables. Was this player a NEED or was this player just the best player on the board? At what number pick did you draft this player? The 5 star player drafted number 1 overall does not deserve an A. But the team who drafts the 4 star player late second round does.
DL
For those of you wanting DL from the draft, here is what McDaniels had to say
On the defensive line
"We certainly have confidence in the group of guys that we have, there’s no question about that. The three down guys, the nose (tackle) and the two
defensive end spots, we added some experienced players in free agency, but we have a bunch of 26, 27-year-olds that have played a lot of football behind
them. Then, we feel good about the depth there because (DL) Ronald Fields, (DL) Ryan McBean, (DL) Marcus Thomas and (DL) Le Kevin Smith, they’ve all
played football, and played a lot of football for us last year. And, (DL) Chris Baker is a young player that we have high expectations for in terms of coming on
and improving this year to improve our depth. The linebacking group, you know that’s always a… when you’re looking for three or four linebackers, there’s
not a lot of teams at college football that play that. So, when you go to your board, there are certainly players that fit for our system, but I know they seem to
go off pretty quickly. We don’t want to reach for somebody who we’re not sure fits when we have a player at a different position that we feel like fits a need
and really improves our competition and depth at another spot."
B+
We got the #1 WR (on McD’s board anyway) [A] (We just got rid of a me-first guy, why would be want Dez?)
We got the #2 C – in the late second Round [A]
We got the #2 QB (on McD’s board – see more later) [B]
We got some really good lineman late [B]
We got a solid KR/PR with 2nd round talent in Round 5. That’s a [A+]
Decker is TBD .. but could replace Stokley. ©
My only down mark is why you make the trade for the 2 7th round picks for guys that may not make the team. [D]
Now here’s a little something on the Tebow pick and Denver is universally getting slammed for picking him with their 2nd pick in the draft.
Here’s a look at who this smart – know it alls – picked either #1,#2 or #3 OVERALL in the draft at the QB position (current grade):
2007 – #1 JaMarcus Russell [F]
2006 – #3 Vince Young [C+] (really up and down)
2005 – #1 Alex Smith [F]
2002 – #1 David Carr [F]
2002 – #3 Joey Harrington [F]
1999 – #1 Tim Couch [F]
1999 – #3 Akili Smith [F]
1998 – #2 Ryan Leaf [F]
1994 – #3 Heath Shuler [D-]
1993 – #2 Rick Mirer [D-]
1990 – #1 Jeff George ©
So there you have it.. all the know it alls have picked some of the biggests flops in history. Now none of this means that Tebow will make it in the NFL, but the reality is nobody else knows either. One thing that Tebow has that everyone in that group doesn’t is the desire and work ethic to do everything he can do to get better.
I liked this
Very well thought out and I like the QB stat. Granted, however, that there are still very good QB’s to come out of some of those years.
that's the point
of course good Qb’s came out those year -but in almost all case (sans McNabb) they were picked after these clowns..
B
I think sometimes McX is a bit cavalier with points, and we lost a potential 4th rounder in a deep draft.
Other than that, I’m happy with the players selected. Would have liked to see us get a little heavier on the offensive line (with either Jerry or Ducasse), but McD knows best who projects well into his scheme.
I just worry at times that he overvalues versatility at the expense of size and talent.
Decker and Cox were two of best value picks in the draft.
That was just on the Tebow trade
When you add in the other trades it was a 3rd rounder. Other execs now know they can get more from Denver than the trade is worth. McD needs to spend some time playing poker up in Black Hawk. Losing a 3rd or 4th every year will add up.
by mauibroncofan on Apr 26, 2010 11:06 AM MDT up reply actions
I voted B
Which means absolutely nothing.
Grading NFL drafts one day after said draft is the very definition of a time suck. Grading NFL drafts one day after is also something folks like Bill Williamson excel at.
In my opinion.
can we hold you to your B for the next week?
ha =)
by Todd Jewell on Apr 26, 2010 10:22 AM MDT up reply actions
Whatever you want. I really don’t care about draft grades this early.
I care about the 2009 draft grade, which got a D+ on it’s first midterm.
In my opinion.
Because I am curious — what will it take for it to get a B from you?
For me:
Alphonso Smith has to get spot play
Knowshon has to get his avg up to 4.2 on 275 carries [1200 yards]
Quinn needs to be starting / blocking in goal /short
Ayers, while I thought did well, needs to have his prescence felt a little more [although it was felt on every sack in the chiefs game]
Seth Olsen should be starting
If 3/5 of those happen, I would give it a B.
by Todd Jewell on Apr 26, 2010 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions
I think that's a little too strict
Polian himself said that 50% of every draft is a mistake. That would put us well past that mark into the A range.
by Fan in Exile on Apr 26, 2010 1:02 PM MDT up reply actions
Smith has to make an impact. We traded away more value to get Smith than we received when we traded away Marshall. I see Cox taking Smith’s spot on the roster and Smith being a healthy inactive in 2010. Grade: F-
Ayers needs to get 6+ sacks next season. This is both reasonable and possible for him. Would be a B grade
1,200 yards from Moreno would be decent. Not great. Worth a B grade.
The 2010 draft told us all we need to know about Olsen’s future in Denver (or lack thereof). Grade: F-
McKinley should win the 5th spot, but I don’t see him making the 2010 team. Grade: F
McBath: Starter. Grade A
Bruton: impact ST player: Grade B+
In my opinion.
McGeorge,
I was talking about the whole draft. Two starters Knowshon, and Ayers (who shouldn’t be measured by Sacks alone). McBath looks like a starter Bruton will probably be a starter. Olsen as a back up is a success for a fourth round pick, you don’t get 7 starters in a draft. Quinn looks to be the successor to Graham.
That’s an A draft in the real world right there whatever Smith, McKinnley and Brandstater do is just icing on the cake.
by Fan in Exile on Apr 27, 2010 8:04 AM MDT up reply actions
a solid B :
I’m certainly no expert but I ask myself – Is the team better now than before? Answer – absolutely. O-line is better, receivers are better, special teams are better, QB maybe better. If you add in all the other FA acquisitions then the whole team is positively better.
The trouble with a deep draft like this one is that all the teams get better also.
The other selections made up for Tebow
The B+ I gave for Thomas and for 2nd round on down brought it back up from the F for Tebow, resulting in a C.
-
BILLY THOMPSON GOT SHAFTED!!
I gave it a B
Here is my thoughts
1. Demaryius Thomas – very tall WR who is explosive = Great pick
2. Tim Tebow – will sit for 2-3 years but could be great = OK pick for 1st Rounder
3. Zane Beadles – like the player but we should have traded down in the 2nd and picked up a extra 3rd or 4th rounder and still we would have gotten Beadles = good pick bad spot.
4. Joe Walton – could be next Tom Nalen = Great Pick
5. Eric Decker – could be next Ed McCafferty = Awesome Pick
6. Perrish Cox – could be the steal of the draft by Mike Lombardi = Great Pick
7. Eric Olsen – overkill in my mind – would have liked a RB
8. S. Thompson – good player but do we need another 5’9" CB????
9. J. Kirlew – flyer in 7th = Ok with that.
So if Denver comes away with 2 Starting WRs , 1 Starting C and a Great CB then I am stoked. Anything that Tebow brings to the table in years 2-3 is icying on the cake.
A, for the creation and execution of the Draft Plan
We had 7 picks going in and came out with 9 players, one from manuvering and one using a next year’s pick. Throw out Tebow and Kirlew and my guess is our Draft is rated one of the best even by the MSM. Thomas, JD, Decker and Cox, smart, versatile, hard workers, and the rest not too shabby, love em all!
broncorat
"Our word for the week has been accountability...and anyone that showed any indifference to that, we’ll play without them, and we’ll play well anyway."
I give it a solid B
I would have liked adding an ILB but the signing of Akin Ayodele eased that concern. I would have also liked to see us add RB depth since Moreno isnt a 20 carry a game NFL talent and the other RBs on our depth chart are injury prone and aging.
We added 20lbs to our center position and another 30 to our guard position. I agree the Beadles pick was a little early but with the injury history of Ryan Harris I think we had to go after a potential replacement. Beadles played against NFL talent at Utah (Hughes, Mt Cody, Tyson Alaui) and word is his film against those guys increased the confidence of McX picking him in the 2nd rd. He also scored a 42 on his wonderlick.
Thomas WILL be a stud as size and speed will trump his lack of route running ability People still criticize B Marsh for his routes and he has 3, 100 catch seasons under his belt.
Tebow was drafted in essence for a 4th rd pick after all our trades and comes with a very high ceiling and the best QB coach in the NFL prepping him.
Cox is a first rd talent, if we can keep him out of the clubs he can be the steal of the draft.
Decker dropped only 2 passes his college career and will be reminding some of us of Ed McCaffery in a couple of years.
If we were able to address RB and ILB i would give this a solid A.
I’ve read MHR for two years, Bronco fan for 40 years, first comment. It doesn’t seem like any of the picks will impact this year. Also, all were taken too high according to the experts. They can’t always be wrong. Finally, Orton is gone. McD threw him under the bus. Even if he has a great year, he would be a fool to stay. I don’t expect better than 8-8 this year because you just can’t have 6-7 new starters and contend. Maybe we are good in a couple of years if Champ and Dawk can still play.
taking the whole thing with a glass is half empty huh?
it seems as if the past 2 off-seasons have been geared toward a focus on long-term, team-first culture, with some effort to win now (which is tied directly back to building a winning culture, as vets can teach the younger kids, blah blah).
future looks really bright for this team, at least we aren’t dealing with that whale jamarcus the hut.
"Devin Setoguchi’s haircut has released the dragon" ~Drew Remenda
For some reason I have a feeling Jumbo is going to be a goddamn beast this year. Sharks are going to be tied 1-1 in the series going on the road for game three in the first round, and five minutes into the second he is just going to take over. ~Plank
"He (Iginla) thinks he’s a pretty tough guy, so why not?" ~ Ryan Clowe
by Jay Fin Anderson on Apr 26, 2010 10:45 PM MDT up reply actions
First time ever I have seen a need meet all its needs in the offseason
if you take into account the free agent mass upgrade of the DL, the drafts on the OL, the drafts of the big WR, the possible punt and kick returner and the free agent signing of a inside linebacker thats excellent in short zone pass protection, I don;t think I have ever seen a NFL team so completely address its needs in the off season. If the TE from the practice squad is able to graduate into a replacement pass catching TE, then we have upgraded every serious need we had.
Thats pretty impressive under any circumstances and if Tebow can handle some Wild Horses spread attack downs every so often that complicates or opponents planning each week against us.
Seems like if a normal great draft gets you 3 good starters or contributers this draft and the combined addition of free agent signings was exceptional. .
Adalius Thomas
has been released thus saith National Football Post. Should we take him in?
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Apr 26, 2010 11:38 AM MDT reply actions
Was thinking about that earlier, too, but I think he's got too much baggage and
worries about attitude. I don’t think McD wants to bring in another “Me First” player after getting rid of others. So it’s doubtful.
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.
Hmmmm... great question
probably totally depends on how much money he wants. He was fabulous in Baltimore, and then never lived up to his contract in NE….
Clearly an "A"
The only way to give a meaningful grade is whether or not you like the players and whether or not they actually fit wht McDaniel’s is trying to do.
I really like every player we got, except Jammie Kirlew, whom I know nothing about, and every one of them is an ideal fit, especially Thomas, Walton, Decker, Olsen and Tebow.
I don’t care how we got them or where we took them, only that we have them. Woulda, coulda, shoulda is a discussion for a couple of years from now.
Bear Claw Chris Lapp: You've come far pilgrim.
Jeremiah Johnson: Feels like far.
Bear Claw Chris Lapp: Were it worth the trouble?
Jeremiah Johnson: What trouble?
by Jeremy Bolander on Apr 26, 2010 11:41 AM MDT reply actions 2 recs
Instant Red Zone Offense...
I personally like the picks. (A)
We addressed areas of need with the offensive lineman that we chose. All of those guys seem to have some flexibility as to where they can line up. I like the Decker pick as he may be an Ed McCaffrey reincarnation. The late pick ups may be a, “throw it against the wall and see what sticks” situation but I like where they are going. Flexible speedy guys who can help in the return game or special teams in general…
Aside from the foot issue with Thomas, he was probably a top 15 projected pick. Not many chances in an option offense but routinely had major production. In other words the man knows how to make the most of his opportunities when given the chance. Seems to be able to take on the role of a Brandon Marshall although although not at the same level yet, he may have the ability to pass him with hard work!
As far as Tebow goes… I seem to remember a while back, before all of the accolades and accomplisments that someone named Chris Leak was the starting UF quarterback. He was servicable and definitely knew how to run the offense between the 20’s. I believe Tim learned Urban’s system as a red zone quarterback and proceeded to claim the starting position in the subsquent years and go on to win all of those awards. What I’m really trying to say, is that we have a very serviceable quarterback who seems to move the ball efficiently between the 20’s in Kyle Orton. What kind of weapon would Tim Tebow be in the Red Zone where the Broncos have traditionally struggled over the past 3 years and beyond!? This essentially lets him learn the most important trait of a winning quarterback – - – Score the ball!!! Any which way you can! Give him the time to become a more refined quarterback between the 20’s and when the time is right, unleash him as our full time starter in 2012/2013. Orton is gone after this year. Quinn may take over for 11/12. He is out of contract for 2013…He may as well be gone, and in steps Tebow…If only Bronco Nation can be satiated with the play of Orton and Quinn until then…We shall see! GO BRONCOS!
by Lucky Mercenary on Apr 26, 2010 12:19 PM MDT reply actions
Ed McCaffrey
Averaged nearly 15 yards per reception in his time in Denver. He ran downfield a lot. Eric Decker runs much shorter routes and does a lot of his catching while he’s facing the quarterback. His game looks a lot more like Brandon Marshall’s game to me. I’m honestly confused as to why he reminds everybody of Ed McCaffrey.
Decker seems to have the averages...
YPC
’06 – 14.5
’07 – 13.6
’08 – 12.8
’09 – 15.2
As far as long receptions…
He has had at least a 75 yd TD in ’08 and as long as 59 in ’09… Not too bad.
Adam Weber’s production fell as well from ‘08 to ’09. Short to intermediate routes may have been the norm after the completion percentage was dropping. Coach may have been tightening the reins so to speak… I don’t know. Time will tell on Decker, but he seems to have shown the potential for heavy production in ’08.
by Lucky Mercenary on Apr 26, 2010 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions
Thanks for digging up the stats. I wonder how that will translate to the NFL. I think Decker will be productive, but I see him playing more of the possession role in Denver. Demaryius Thomas looks like the down-the-field guy. I guess we’ll check back in January and see how things look after one year.
similar build and statistics
Will take hits and hold onto the ball. 3 drops in three years. Sounds a lot like Eddie Mac to me.
"as in football so in life"
Please
let Eric Decker be the next Eddie McCaffrey. That would be so cool!
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Apr 26, 2010 3:25 PM MDT up reply actions
C
Tebow is an reach and project and not worth the 1st round pick. Beadles doesn’t make a lot of sense to me, doesn’t really fit as a guard, won’t be a center, and right now looks like a back-up RT at this point, not sure you waste a high second rounder on a back-up RT, especially when Ducasse was on the board, interesting the best running team in the NFL drafts him to replace Faneca, shows someone liked his talent and upside alot.
I like both the 3rd round picks, but then to take another center in Olson, I just don’t get. Especially when there were some decent front seven defensive prospects on the board. Trading back into the 7th, a bit risky, but not a bad idea.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
I gave it a B
because, even though I understand the Tebow thing the result was we helped ourselves on the O-line just a little bit less than I wanted. I’ve seen mid-rounders festooned with glowing descriptions come and go. I wanted Pouncy. It might be that McDaniels did too, but above all he wanted Tebow and it may be he sacrificed the one to get the other. If he’s got, in this very draft, the quarterback he wants to go to war with, great draft. And even if Pouncy was sacrificed Thomas is a great consolation prize and might even have been the preference. His description reads like B-Marsh2.0 without the maturity issues. Faster, can catch over the shoulder. I’m uninspired but willing to be explained to regarding the O-liners, thrilled by the receivers, and excited by the prospect of Cox being a super steal. As for Tebow, I honestly think he will turn out to be McDaniels’ Joe Montana, but I honestly can’t say I’m totally sure about that.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
Grade A
positionally we addressed our woes on offense from last yr and the recent WR vacancy. Defensively we seem to have gotten a couple of solid contributors. Kick returning was addressed too.
Unless you exppected to get Suh, Pouncey, McClain and Thomas, this draft was ideal. Anyone who considers picks one or two rounds from where they thought they would be picked is foolish, since the details of each player cause the fluctuations. Beadles was not a reach IMO, neither was Walton, contrary to some opinions out here. The rest were solid.
by Orange and Blue on Apr 26, 2010 1:26 PM MDT reply actions
doh! missed a word
insert “reaches” in “Anyone who consider picks reaches one or two…”
by Orange and Blue on Apr 26, 2010 1:28 PM MDT reply actions
Good but..
Offensively I think we addressed some key issues in the O-line and at WR which was starting to look like there could be some problems. BUT I think we gave a little too much to trade for Tebow (although im not a big downer on the pick itself) and I wish that instead of Beadles in the 2nd round, we went out and picked a player like Taylor Mays who would’ve been a STEAL as late as he was picked. 230 pounds running a 4.3? That is rediculous and guys like Dawkins aren’t getting any younger. I know we have Barret and the McBath (I think is his name) but Mays is a top talent who would’ve gone in the top 10 had he gone into last years draft.
I also wish we would have gotten someone like Donald Butler in the third but he was snagged early by San Diego I believe….
All wishing aside I think our draft gets a initial grade of a B. Depending on how players like Tebow, Thomas, Beadles, Decker, and Cox develope it could go to a A+
Or they could all flop and get a F. You never know with the draft
God I cant wait till camp starts.
I was a D, early on in the poll. But the caveat is spot on, that we don’t know for at least a year, maybe longer. My low grade was for the first round; we replaced one player with one “like” him, only cheaper (no garuntee, tho…..); and we took a project QB. A Center might get substantial playing time, only because we let Wiegman go… I didn’t see “additions” so much as “replacements” for an average team. Not the way to improve, in my book.
But what do I know- I loved Griese coming out of Michigan…………..
the sad thing is
It doesn’t matter how good the players drafted are or will be. This draft’s grade will lie completely on Tebow. For years to come MSM (and probably others) will refer to the quality of this draft based on Tebow’s production.
I feel bad for the guy it seems like everyone is constantly gunning for him.
Fortunately his personality/attitude so far has been to prove himself worthy\excellent. I believe this media judgement\criticism will continue to fuel his drive to succeed and we will be the lucky ones to benefit from it.
Isn't that the truth...
Damaryius Thomas went from 1st round glory to after thought in about 15 minutes. Not around here— but just about every where else.
Could be good for Thomas. Less pressure.
Denialists replace the open-minded skepticism of science with the inflexible certainty of ideological commitment.-- Michael Spector
by PredominantlyOrange on Apr 26, 2010 7:17 PM MDT up reply actions
Good point about Thomas
He has big shoes to fill in Baby TO’s absence. Hopefully he can do it easier now that the spotlight is on Tebow.
I really hope Thomas and Decker can be like Garcon and Collie last year. They came in and together filled in for the missing Marvin Harrison.
I said A
but could it have been better? possiblely
if we never traded up and hoped our guy was there when we picked, however you can’t do this because your playing against the odds. Of course its possible to have a better draft but this one looks like an A from my knowledge
CentSports free 10 cents to bet with Better than Fantasy Football, pick'em!!
McDaniels is Outrageous
OK, I have been most critical of some of the moves of Josh McDaniels, but now his penchant for doing the outrageous is starting to rub off on me and make me smile. The guy likes drama swirling all around and he is succeeding at ever step.
My grade for the draft was a B. I think some of the maneuvers and selections were reaches, but there were some very good choices that will probably make the team a stronger one in the near future.
The OL choices were good value picks, but will take time to develop. Can’t complain about the WR choices either, but I hope we have a good foot orthopod on retainer.
I would have liked to have seen Toby Gerhart and Golden Tate picked.
That CB selection did not exactly fit the criteria of the all character team, but he was a very good value selection at the point he was picked.
The Tebow move was interesting, and I think if I was Brady Quinn or Kyle Orton, I would be consuming massive quantities of antacids, but it was a pure McDaniels move and he will rise or fall with it.
Should be a fun season.
by Baltimore Bronco on Apr 27, 2010 6:54 AM MDT reply actions
C only because...
he could have gotten a lot more value out of this draft. Judging by the point system, I feel he did pretty poorly with his draft picks. Makes me wonder how he manages his family income. But I do like the picks overall, I just strongly believe if he had better managed, we could have gotten Sergio Kindle.

by 






































