Just! Do! Your! Job! (Heroes and Goats)
The NFL chose to put a microphone on Broncos Head Coach Josh McDaniels during the week 4 game versus the Cowboys. Those sound bytes gave Broncos fans some quotes which have quickly become a part of Bronco lore. Things like:
To QB Kyle Orton: "I'm not talking about my bad anymore. Just make the play!
and, right after that one, these words to the entire offensive unit:
Right after that, to the entire offensive unit: "Get in here! When we quit (bleeped) around and just do our job and quit worrying about everybody else's job and doing your own thing. That's what's killing us right now!
Finally, the one that has become a personal favorite of mine:
Do! Your! Job! and quit making (bleeped) up.
As I have walked back through the games of 2009, I have been raising up one theme or football truism which leapt out to me as I watched. So far, I have offered for your consideration:
Keeping Eyes on the Ball
Feeling the Pressure of the Rush
Controlling the Gaps
Problem of Penalties
Use of Time Outs/Challenges
This time around, as I went back and watched the first gave versus San Diego, I found myself considering what I call "Heroes and Goats" -- the play of special teams.
What this means? After the jump
The 5-0 Broncos traveled to San Diego to take on the AFC West rival Chargers. The thing which stood out during this game more than any other single thing was the play of the special teams of both franchises.
It is, IMHO, an unfortunate part of the game that the special teams are all too often either derided as being the goats who cost their team the game, or are simply ignored as being of no real consequence. Very rarely do the special teams get heralded as heroes in the same way that the offensive and defensive units. In the Denver-San Diego game (version 1.0) this was not the case.
In that game, Denver ran 63 offensive plays and San Diego ran 59. In addition to those plays, there were 27 special teams plays. This would include kick offs & returns, punts & returns, and field goal attempts. 13 of those plays were kick offs and the subsequent returns. 7 were punts & returns. 7 were field goal attempts. Let's take a look at these different groups.
Kick Offs & Returns
Denver kicked off 7 times. Those 7 kicks landed as follows: SD8, SD5, SD11, SD -1, SD4, SD7, and SD4. The Chargers, then, got the ball at an average spot of their own 5 yard line. Sounds pretty good.
The Chargers had returns on those kick offs of: 16, 21, 21, 30, 22, 20, and 19. This gave them an average starting line scrimmage after the kick offs of their own 27 yard line. Not so good.
San Diego, by way of comparison, kicked off 6 times. Those 6 kicks landed as follows: DEN7, DEN8, DEN7, DEN5, DEN11, and DEN5. The Broncos got the ball at an average spot of their own 7 yard line. Not too bad, they started with the ball about 2 yards further up the field than the Chargers did when the Broncos kicked.
The Broncos returns on those 6 kick offs were: 93 (and a TD), 14, 18, 18, 14, and 18. This gave them an average starting line of scrimmage after kick offs of their own 24 yard line. Not so impressive, given the returns by the Chargers.
So, on the upside, Denver -- on the average -- kicked the ball deeper than the Chargers, but San Diego returned those kicks farther. The bright spot for Denver in this part of the football battle was Royal's 93 yard kick off return for a touchdown.
Punts & Returns
The Broncos punted the ball 4 times. Those punts landed as follows: SD12, SD23, End Zone, and End Zone. This would seem to be a pretty effective punting attack. Especially when we consider that San Diego made a Fair Catch on the first punt, and the 3rd & 4th punts resulted in touchbacks. This gave San Diego an average starting line of scrimmage of their own 17 yard line (starting at the 12 and 2x at the 20). Squeezed in between the 1st & 3rd punts, however, was a 77 yard punt return for a touchdown.
San Diego punted the ball 3 times. Those punts landed as follows: DEN25, DEN29 and the DEN24. An adequate job of pushing the Broncos deep, but not as deep as Denver had pushed the Chargers. The Chargers covered 1st & 3rd punts extremely well, allowing only a 1 yard and a 5 yard return respectively. However, the 2nd punt was returned 71 yards for a touchdown. The average starting point for Denver was their own 27 yard line.
Both teams returned a punt for a touchdown. As with the kick offs, Denver tended to kick the ball deeper than their opponents, but also gave up larger returns -- a touchback has the same effect as a 20 yard return.
Field Goals
The Broncos attempted 3 field goals (34, 54, and 29 yards). They made 2 of them (34 and 29 yards). The Chargers attempted 4 field goals (20, 44, 50 and 55 yards). San Diego made 3 of them (20, 44, and 50 yards). Thus, the kicking game added 6 points for Denver and 9 points for the Chargers.
Observations
Overall, both the special teams from both sides provided a much needed spark to their respective teams. Without the points generated by field goals and returns, the final in that game (34-23) would have stood at 14-7 (in favor of Denver).
On a day when neither offense was looking consistently good (118 net yards for Denver, 207 for San Diego), and neither defense was looking particularly dominant (both defenses gave up long time consuming drives), the special teams rose to the occasion -- though it must be admitted that the Broncos special teams rose just a tad higher, outscoring the Chargers' unit 20-16.
30 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ineresting how consistent
the score of the game without ST included, is to the score with ST. Just one score of difference any way you slice it.
I am very optimistic for Our Special Teams unit this year. Colquitt in (and confident) as punter, and can fill in for Prater on Field Goals or kick-off duties if needed, certainly helps boost that confidence….. But what really drives my optimism, is the quality of players We have on ST’s, with a year under their belts in the ‘new’ ST scheme-age….. I feel the kick placement and yardage may not change much, but the coverage thereafter will be much more adequate. Thanks for the supplement to the series. I don’t think there has been a ‘bad’ or uninteresting series ever here at MHR.
That's quite a long handle there, G Funk. - That's what she said.
First (and only, in our lifetimes) team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! ( =
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Jul 16, 2010 12:13 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I must learn to specify and elaborate properly
Interesting how consistent the score of the game without ST would have been = 14-7 (Denver)
To how the score of the game would have been with only ST = 20-16 (Denver)
I know it’s been said before, but ST itself, is almost a whole separate game within the game – and you exemplify a good portion of why with this post, thanks again B.
That's quite a long handle there, G Funk. - That's what she said.
First (and only, in our lifetimes) team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! ( =
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Jul 17, 2010 1:57 PM MDT up reply actions
If anyone wants to hear the whole audio of McDaniels "mic'd up"....
by isaac303h on Jul 16, 2010 1:15 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
thanks for the link
It’s fun to watch McDaniels’ energy in that clip
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 16, 2010 2:37 PM MDT up reply actions
I do, I do
Thanks for the link
Two off-seasons, four 1st round selections, four 2nd round selections - a terrific defense and a young, highly drafted offense that will be. I never predicted playoffs last year, but I certainly do this year...
B Shrout
Buon compleanno, Feliz Cumpleanos and Bom Anniversaria (a.k.a., Happy Birthday in Italian, Spanish and Portuguese, respectively!) McDaniels definitely brings magnificent energy. We are lucky to have a coach like that!
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Jul 16, 2010 2:59 PM MDT reply actions
Wow, a multi-lingual birthday greeting. I am humbled. ;-p
It is appreciated. I agree that we’re lucky to have a coach with the passion for the game that McDaniels brings
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 16, 2010 8:55 PM MDT up reply actions
Great series Brian
I agree with PJ, our ST’s will be an improved unit this year.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
I definitely hope we see better, or even more consistent play from the ST's this year
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 16, 2010 8:54 PM MDT up reply actions
punt team terrible
The special teams were not bad except for our punt team. Both of those punts for touchbacks were poor kicks They both occurred after drives stalled around midfield and were great opportunities to pin the bolts offense deep in their own territory. Check the entire season we lost the field position game in regards to punts
oldcoachB
No argument there
Our punting game was indeed terrible, hence the punter switch midstream — that was supposed to provide us with a punter who could position the punt. Unfortunately that did not happen consistently.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 16, 2010 8:54 PM MDT up reply actions
I enjoyed that examination.
It seems that both teams needed to get spark out of their special teams.
Interesting thought… if San Diego, realistically, took a while to fire on all cylinders last year I wonder how theyll go if they end up being without Jackson and Neil – to important parts of their biggest strength. Sproles better lightup special teams again for them!
And another thought… why dont you guys have a ‘long punter’ and a ‘short punter’ on the team? Or at the very least just buy an Australian Football League (AFL) kicker like some other teams do. They tend to get bought at the twighlight of their career but I think if you got someone sooner from the AFL they could be all-pro quality punters. They put the ball on a dime again and again in that league. Off both feet (hmmm, another idea.)
And happy birthday to you sir! Sorry Im a bit late there1
"The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game." - Derek Robinson
"You've got to get your first tackle in early, even if it's late." - Ray Gravell
Thanks for the thoughts and the b-day greeting
So far as 2 punters go, it probably has as much to do with the 53-man limit on the roster as anything else. The typical NFL roster will often breakdown like this:
3 QB, 4-5 RB, 5-6 WR, 3 TE, 8-9 O-line
8-9 D-line, 8-9 LB, 5 CB, 4-5 Safeties
1 Kicker, 1 Punter, 1 Long Snapper
So an extra punter would require a reduction somewhere else.
Given the fact that a team usually has 10-12 drives on the average in a game. And, if they’re playing effectively will hopefully not be punting more than 50% of the time. So hopefully, the team won’t be punting more than 4-5 times. It doesn’t make sense, to me anyway, to have an extra player on the team who might only be on the field for 1-2 plays per game. But that’s just my take on it.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 12:49 AM MDT up reply actions
on rare occasions
you will see a team carry two place kickers as the Broncos did in the early nineties with Elam and (can’t remember his name). The second guy was great at getting touchbacks on kickoffs, but I can’t think of another team in the era of the 53 man roster carrying two place kickers. A few teams will use there punter on kickoffs because he has a stronger leg.
I have never seen a team carry two punters. Every team will designate an emergency punter (usually the place kicker) in case in the regular punter gets injured.
by DE_BroncoFan on Jul 19, 2010 7:06 AM MDT up reply actions
Happy Birthday B!
Keep up the good work, sir!
- Nick
"Know the enemy, know yourself, and victory is never in doubt, not in a hundred battles."
- Sun Tzu
"if you look close, there’s a hoodie lurking in the background of picture 4. similar to the classic sasquatch shot and equally stunning, as the denver temperature today is relatively fair."
-oxmouth
Thanks for the birthday greeting
and glad you enjoyed the article.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 16, 2010 8:52 PM MDT up reply actions
Thanks
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 16, 2010 8:52 PM MDT up reply actions
Do you guys think Royal is the answer at returner?
I might be more inclined to have him focus on being a receiver.
"What are you, stupid? It doesn't take a rocket doctor to figure that one out!" -Frank Caliendo as George Bush
by broncodude793 on Jul 16, 2010 7:54 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
ditto that
much prefer Royal as a receiver, but if the new guys don’t step up for the returner role, from what I’ve heard McDaniels say, we’ll see Royal pulling double duty again.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 16, 2010 8:51 PM MDT up reply actions
I think Royal has been a pretty big disappointment in the return game to be honest and want to see him concentrate on being e better, more dynamic version of Wes Welker.
You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
no argument with wanting him to be a receiver first
While I wasn’t overwhelmed with Royal as a returner, I’m not convinced he was a bust either.
On punts, he had 30 returns and was 8th in the league in yards (335) and 7th in average (11.2). The league’s 1st place players in both categories had: 474 yards (40 returns), and 15.2 (29 returns)
On kick offs, he was much less effective with his 26 returns falling to 27th in yards (621) and 20th in average (23.9). To get into the top ten, he would have needed 1154 yards (as a side note, none of the top 10 kick off returners had fewer than 41 returns) and an average of 25.8 (only 1 of the top 10 kick off returners had fewer than 28 returns).
Eddie’s biggest issue, IMHO, was trying to create returns when there was nothing there. Add in the number of whiffs on blocks by his teammates and we saw a pretty poor return game throughout the majority of the season.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 17, 2010 9:01 AM MDT up reply actions
Dang it
You beat me to it Brian. Lol
Great minds indeed!
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Did not call him a bust...just a big disappointment. Stats are stats....I watched and saw nothing ON A CONSISTENT BASIS that had me excited!
You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
sorry, boydy, didn't mean to imply that you were calling him a bust
He’s been called that by others, so I generalized. Apologies.
And I would agree, Royal as a returner did not overwhelm anyone on a consistent basis.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 18, 2010 11:51 AM MDT up reply actions
Thanks for the writeup
If it weren’t for allowing “look at me scoring” Sproles return that TD then we would have had a perfect game in that area. I really hope we have several games like that and a few more returns by whoever our new returner is. I am sure Royal will get his, however I hope one of the new guys finds his nitch in this department.
On a side note, that was a freakin awesome game and I was jumping up and down all over my condo on those returns. Living in SD, the next day at work was priceless.
Floyd Little: HOF Class of 2010.
2009-10 back-to-back NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009-10 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
I'll bet it was great going into work in SD after that first game.
I loved the fact that Royal got 2 returns for TDs in that game.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 17, 2010 12:07 AM MDT up reply actions
Don't Look Now
but we’re four weeks removed from the preseason commencing. Let’s beat the Bengals!
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Jul 19, 2010 12:41 AM MDT reply actions
works for me
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 12:50 AM MDT up reply actions
HOLY CRAP
I haven’t read any of the articles in the last week but this morning I was overcome with excitement because I looked at the calendar and saw IT’S ALMOST TRAINING CAMP TIME AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.
Can hardly wait!!!!
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 10:25 AM MDT up reply actions

by 



























