2010 Denver Broncos Positional Preview - Wide Receivers
This is a unit in the middle of a rather significant make-over. There are understandable concerns raised by the departures of Brandon Marshall and Tony Scheffler, who together accounted for 40% of the Broncos' receiving yards in 2009 along with 57% of the receiving touchdowns. Denver has veterans who should be able to take up the slack -- Jabar Gaffney, Eddie Royal, Brandon Stokley, and Brandon Lloyd. The Broncos also have Kenny McKinley and Matt Willis who have been around the NFL but have yet to show what they can do. Gaffney should be solid as a primary WR. Royal will hopefully return to his 1st year form. The rest of the veterans will need to show the rookies the way to be successful. Denver currently has a long slate of WRs going into Training Camp. There are a lot of optimistic comments coming out of the OTAs regarding the play of Thomas, Willis, McKinley and Lloyd, so perhaps the predictions of doom and gloom regarding our receiving corp are premature. After the fold, let's put some faces and history to these men.
Since the Broncos have not yet released an official depth chart, I chose to list these players by years in the NFL. If two or more players have the same level of experience, I chose to list them alphabetically by last name.
The Basics
| Acquired: Free Agency, 2007 |
Pro Year: 12th |
Broncos Year: 4th |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 118/35 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 12/1 |
Born: Blacksburg, VA |
Highlights
| Is widely acclaimed as one of the most effective slot WRs in the NFL |
Has Super Bowl rings from two different teams (2000 Ravens & 2006 Colts) |
| Has 8 100-yard games, 4 40-catch seasons, and 1 1000-yard seasons in his career |
Scored the first points of Super Bowl XXXV on a 38-yard pass reception |
| Ranks 5th in 1st Down Percentage (77.5) during his years as a Bronco |
Was a key part of Indianapolis' AFC South titles (2003-2006) |
| Ranked 9th in NCAA career receiving yards (3,072) and 10th in career receptions (241) |
Set all of his school's receiving records |
| Exceeded 1000 receiving yards in 3 of his 4 collegiate years (was limited to 4 games his junior season due to a knee injury) |
Statistics
| High School | Played football only in his freshman and senior years; his senior year caught 80 passes for 946 yards (11.8 average) |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 1995 |
11 |
75 |
1121 |
9 |
| 1996 |
11 |
81 |
1160 |
7 |
| 1997 |
4 |
20 |
248 |
1 |
| 1998 |
11 |
65 |
1173 |
8 |
| NFL |
|||||
| Year |
Receptions |
Yards |
Average |
Longest |
TDs |
| 1999 (Bal) |
1 |
28 |
28.0 |
28 |
1 |
| 2000 (Bal) |
11 |
184 |
16.7 |
32 |
2 |
| 2001 (Bal) |
24 |
344 |
14.3 |
46 |
2 |
| 2002 (Bal) |
24 |
357 |
14.9 |
35 |
2 |
| 2003 (Ind) |
22 |
211 |
9.6 |
37 |
3 |
| 2004 (Ind) |
68 |
1077 |
15.8 |
69 |
10 |
| 2005 (Ind) |
41 |
543 |
13.2 |
45 |
1 |
| 2006 (Ind) |
8 |
85 |
10.6 |
23 |
1 |
| 2007 (Den) |
40 |
635 |
15.9 |
58 |
5 |
| 2008 (Den) |
49 |
528 |
10.8 |
36 |
3 |
| 2009 (Den) |
19 |
327 |
17.2 |
87 |
4 |
| TOTALS |
307 |
4319 |
14.1 |
87 |
34 |
| Postseason |
|||||
| 2000 (Bal) |
7 |
91 |
13.0 |
38 |
1 |
| 2001 (Bal) |
2 |
38 |
19.0 |
27 |
0 |
| 2003 (Ind) |
11 |
223 |
20.3 |
87 |
3 |
| 2004 (Ind) |
10 |
97 |
9.7 |
21 |
0 |
| 2005 (Ind) |
1 |
13 |
13.0 |
13 |
0 |
| TOTALS |
31 |
462 |
14.9 |
87 |
Snapshots from Life
**Has been active in raising money for the Meningitis Foundation of America
**Donated clothing, food and supplies to victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
**Is married to Lana, and has two sons -- Cameron and Carson
The Basics
| Acquired: Unrestricted Free Agent (New England) 2009 |
Pro Year: 9th |
Broncos Year: 2nd |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 123/77 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 6/4 |
Born: Jacksonville, FL |
Highlights
| Earned consensus first-team All-American honors as a redshirt sophomore at the University of Florida |
In 2001 ranked 2nd in the nation in receiving yards per game (108.3) |
| Set an NCAA Division I-A freshman record for receiving yards and receiving touchdowns as a redshirt freshman in 2000 |
Earned consensus National Freshman of the Year and All-SEC honors |
| Has appeared in 16 games and totaled 400 receiving yards or more in 6 out of 7 seasons with NE and Hou |
Has 14 career games with 80 or more yards and 4 with 100 yards or more |
| Caught a career high 5 receiving touchdowns in 2007 to help NE post the first ever 16-0 regular season record |
In 2006, set an NFL record with consecutive 8-catch, 100-yard receiving games in the playoffs |
| Set a career high for receiving yards (732) in his first season with Denver |
Gaffney's teams are 4-0 (including 2 post season games) when he has recorded 100 or more yards in a game |
Statistics
| High School | Was a 2-year starter in high school. He caught the game-winning touchdown pass in the 4th quarter of the state championship game his junior year. |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 2000 |
12 |
71 |
1184 |
14 |
| 2001 |
11 |
67 |
1191 |
13 |
| NFL |
|||||
| Year |
Receptions |
Yards |
Average |
Longest |
TDs |
| 2002 (Hou) |
41 |
483 |
11.8 |
27 |
1 |
| 2003 (Hou) |
34 |
402 |
11.8 |
33 |
2 |
| 2004 (Hou) |
41 |
632 |
15.4 |
69 |
2 |
| 2005 (Hou) |
55 |
492 |
8.9 |
29 |
2 |
| 2006 (NE) |
11 |
142 |
12.9 |
33 |
1 |
| 2007 (NE) |
36 |
449 |
12.5 |
56 |
5 |
| 2008 (NE) |
38 |
468 |
12.3 |
37 |
2 |
| 2009 (Den) |
54 |
732 |
13.6 |
49 |
2 |
| TOTALS |
310 |
3800 |
12.3 |
69 |
17 |
| Postseason |
|||||
| 2006 (NE) |
21 |
244 |
11.6 |
31 |
2 |
| 2007 (NE) |
4 |
38 |
9.5 |
13 |
1 |
| TOTALS |
25 |
282 |
11.3 |
31 |
3 |
Snapshots from Life
**Is married. He and his wife, Terin have two children: son - Jackson and daughter - Teagan
The Basics
| Acquired: Free Agency, 2009 |
Pro Year: 8th |
Broncos Year: 2nd |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 81/48 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Born: Kansas City, MO |
Highlights
| Tied for second among all players with three successful two-point conversions since 2003 |
Has 4 100-yard receiving games in his NFL career |
| Was the University of Illinois’ second-leading receiver with 2,583 receiving yards and 21 touchdowns. |
Only 2nd player in University of Illinois history to have 2 1000-yard receiving yards in his college career |
Statistics
| High School | Was a cornerback, wide receiver, kicker and punter in high school |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 2000 |
11 |
30 |
511 |
2 |
| 2001 |
11 |
65 |
1062 |
10 |
| 2002 |
12 |
65 |
1010 |
9 |
| NFL |
|||||
| Year |
Receptions |
Yards |
Average |
Longest |
TDs |
| 2003 (SF) |
14 |
212 |
15.1 |
44 |
2 |
| 2004 (SF) |
43 |
565 |
13.1 |
52 |
6 |
| 2005 (SF) |
48 |
733 |
15.3 |
89 |
5 |
| 2006 (Was) |
23 |
365 |
15.9 |
52 |
0 |
| 2007 (Was) |
2 |
14 |
7.0 |
9 |
0 |
| 2008 (Chi) |
26 |
364 |
14.0 |
32 |
2 |
| 2009 (Den |
8 |
117 |
14.6 |
44 |
0 |
| TOTALS |
164 |
2370 |
14.5 |
89 |
15 |
Snapshots from Life
**Majored in speech communications with an emphasis in journalism.
The Basics
| Acquired: 2nd Round (42nd overall) 2008 Draft |
Pro Year: 3rd |
Broncos Year: 3rd |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 29/27 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Born: Alexandria, VA |
Highlights
| Was Virginia Tech's all-time leader in all-purpose yards (4,686) |
Set an ACC record for punt return yards (1,296) |
| College career ranked 4th in receptions (119), 5th in receiving touchdowns (12) and 6th in receiving yards (1,778) at Virginia Tech |
In 2008 totaled the 2nd most receptions (91) by a rookie in NFL history |
| Earned all-rookie honors from Pro Football Weekly in 2008 |
In 2008 set Broncos' records for receptions (91), receiving yards (980) and receiving touchdowns (5) |
| In 2008, became the 1st player since the 1970 NFL/AFL merger to post his team's longest kickoff return (95 yds), reception (93 yds), run (71), and punt return (36 yds) in the same year |
Set a Broncos' rookie single game record with 11 catches vs San Diego on 12/28/08 |
| Recorded the 6th highest receiving yardage (146 yds) by a player in his first career game since 1960 |
Statistics
| High School | Caught 41 passes for 875 yards with 11 touchdowns as a senior to help his HS win their division's state championship. Returned 10 kickoffs for touchdowns. SuperPrep rated him as the top player in Virginia. |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 2004 |
12 |
28 |
470 |
3 |
| 2005 |
13 |
27 |
315 |
2 |
| 2006 |
13 |
31 |
497 |
3 |
| 2007 |
13 |
33 |
496 |
4 |
| College |
||||||
| Year |
Punt Returns |
Yards |
Average |
Kickoff Returns |
Yards |
Average |
| 2004 |
25 |
274 |
11.0 |
12 |
346 |
28.8 |
| 2005 |
32 |
263 |
8.2 |
14 |
293 |
20.9 |
| 2006 |
23 |
304 |
13.2 |
19 |
431 |
22.7 |
| 2007 |
31 |
455 |
14.7 |
14 |
316 |
22.6 |
| NFL |
||||||
| Year |
Receptions |
Yards |
Average |
Longest |
TDs |
|
| 2008 |
91 |
980 |
10.8 |
93 |
5 |
|
| 2009 |
37 |
345 |
9.3 |
20 |
0 |
|
| TOTALS |
128 |
1325 |
10.4 |
93 |
5 |
|
| Year |
Punt Returns |
Yards |
Average |
Kickoff Returns |
Yards |
Average |
| 2008 |
23 |
600 |
26.1 |
|||
| 2009 |
31 |
335 |
10.8 |
26 |
621 |
23.9 |
| TOTALS |
||||||
| Year |
Punt Return TDs |
Kickoff Return TDs |
||||
| 2008 |
0 |
|||||
| 2009 |
1 |
1 |
||||
| TOTALS |
1 |
Snapshots from Life
** Earned a Bachelor's degree in Sociology in 3 1/2 years.
The Basics
| Acquired: Free Agency, 2008 |
Pro Year: 3rd |
Broncos Year: 2nd |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 6/1 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Born: Dallas, TX |
Highlights
| Won accolades in HS for accomplishments in track and soccer |
In 2003, was a part of the US Junior National track team and participated in the Junior Pan Am Games in Barbados |
| Entered the NFL as a College Free Agent in 2007 |
Statistics
| High School | Only played football during his freshman and sophomore years |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 2005 |
8 |
3 |
29 |
1 |
| 2006 |
13 |
21 |
219 |
2 |
| NFL |
|||||
| Year |
Receptions |
Yards |
Average |
Longest |
TDs |
| 2009 (Den) |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
| TOTALS |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
Snapshots from Life
**Majored in Sociology
The Basics
| Acquired: 5th round (141st overall) 2009 Draft |
Pro Year: 2nd |
Broncos Year: 2nd |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 8/0 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Born: Mableton, GA |
Highlights
| Set school records for receptions (207) and yards (2,781) |
Scored 19 touchdowns in his 4 years in college |
| Called "Best receiver ever coached" by SCU Head Coach Steve Spurrier |
Only 5th player in SEC history to make more than 200 catches in a career |
| In 2007 led the SEC with 80.7 receiving yards per game |
In 2009, finished 3rd in punt and kick return yardage for Denver |
Statistics
| High School | Played QB in his junior and senior years. Threw for 3,045 yards and 28 touchdowns. Rushed for 1,150 yards and 20 touchdowns. |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 2005 |
12 |
25 |
291 |
1 |
| 2006 |
13 |
51 |
880 |
5 |
| 2007 |
12 |
77 |
968 |
9 |
| 2008 |
10 |
54 |
642 |
4 |
| NFL |
||||||
| Year |
Kick Returns |
Yards |
Average |
Punt Returns |
Yards |
Average |
| 2009 |
7 |
158 |
22.6 |
3 |
32 |
10.7 |
Snapshots from Life
** Majored in Retailing at South Carolina
The Basics
| Acquired: College Free Agency, 2010 |
Pro Year: 1st |
Broncos Year: 1st |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Born: Belle Glade, FL |
Highlights
| Was named team captain on his HS football team |
Posted 3rd best time in Florida in the 400-meter event in track while in HS |
| Led WVA in receiving yards as a junior |
Ranked 2nd as a senior in receptions and receiving yards |
| Was a 2 year starter at WVA after playing for 2 community colleges his freshman and sophomore years |
Statistics
| High School | Competed in both football and track |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 2008 (West Virginia) |
13 |
35 |
466 |
6 |
| 2009 (West Virginia) |
13 |
43 |
586 |
3 |
| NFL |
|||||
| Year |
Receptions |
Yards |
Average |
Longest |
TDs |
| 2010 |
Rookie |
No |
NFL |
Stats |
Yet |
Snapshots from Life
**Majored in Athletic Coaching Education
The Basics
| Acquired: 3rd Round (87th overall) 2010 Draft |
Pro Year: 1st |
Broncos Year: 1st |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Born: Cold Spring, MN |
Highlights
| Acclaimed by many scouts as being a premier pass receiver, with comparisons to Don Maynard and Raymond Berry |
Is widely praised for having great hands, solid route running and a willingness to go after the ball in a crowd, as well as being a great blocker |
| Has been praised for his team first attitude and work ethic |
Had only 3 drops (out of 354 targets and 227 catches) |
| Ranks 6th in Big 10 Conference history in receptions |
Produced 1st downs on over 74% of his receptions |
| Converted 3rd Downs on 22% of his receptions |
1st receiver in Minnesota history to have more than 200 career receptions (227) |
| 1st player in Minnesota history to amass over 3000 receiving yards (3119) |
29.5% of his catches led to his team going on to score |
| Has 30 TD catches in the Red Zone (16 came on goal line plays) |
Red-shirted as a freshman in 2005 |
Statistics
| High School | Earned numerous HS awards; finished his career with 2156 yards and 28 touchdowns |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 2006 |
13 |
26 |
378 |
3 |
| 2007 |
13 |
67 |
909 |
9 |
| 2008 |
12 |
84 |
1074 |
7 |
| 2009 |
8 |
50 |
758 |
5 |
| NFL |
|||||
| Year |
Receptions |
Yards |
Average |
Longest |
TDs |
| 2010 |
Rookie |
No |
NFL |
Stats |
Yet |
Snapshots from Life
**Business and Marketing major
The Basics
| Acquired: College Free Agency, 2010 |
Pro Year: 1st |
Broncos Year: 1st |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Born: Hoover, AL |
Highlights
| Was Red-shirted as a freshman in 2005 |
Missed the entire 2006 season with a knee injury |
| Ranked 4th in school history in receptions |
Statistics
| High School | received numerous HS awards; was invited to play in the Max Emfinger All-American game |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 2007 |
12 |
28 |
328 |
1 |
| 2008 |
12 |
51 |
513 |
3 |
| 2009 |
12 |
37 |
420 |
4 |
| NFL |
|||||
| Year |
Receptions |
Yards |
Average |
Longest |
TDs |
| 2010 |
Rookie |
No |
NFL |
Stats |
Yet |
Snapshots from Life
**Majored in Construction Management Technology
The Basics
| Acquired: 1st round (21st overall), 2010 Draft |
Pro Year: 1st |
Broncos Year: 1st |
| NFL Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Postseason Games Played/Started: 0/0 |
Born: Montrose, GA |
Highlights
| Nick-named "Bay-Bay" |
Red-shirted as a freshman in 2006 |
| Had string of 3 consecutive games with at least 1 TD catch of over 70 yards as a junior |
His size and athletic ability created mismatches for many cornerbacks |
| In 2009, he accounted for 37 of the Yellow Jackets' 67 plays that went for 20 or more yards |
His 1154 receiving yards in 2009 was the 2nd highest in school history |
| Turned down scholarship offers from Georgia and Duke |
Earned first team All ACC honors in 2007 and again in 2009 |
Statistics
| High School | In his junior and senior years, compiled 88 catches for 1086 yards and 10 touchdowns; was ranked as the 58th-best WR in the country by Rivals.com |
| College |
||||
| Year |
Games |
Receptions |
Yards |
Touchdowns |
| 2007 |
13 |
35 |
558 |
4 |
| 2008 |
12 |
39 |
627 |
3 |
| 2009 |
14 |
46 |
1154 |
8 |
| NFL |
|||||
| Year |
Receptions |
Yards |
Average |
Longest |
TDs |
| 2010 |
Rookie |
No |
NFL |
Stats |
Yet |
Snapshots from Life
**Management major
While there are a lot of question marks here: Will the veterans step it up? Are there rookies who will be able to have an immediate impact? And so on, there are equally reasons to be optimistic. The body of work for both our veterans and our rookies are impressive across the board. I am left with the feeling -- after compiling all of the information on this group of players -- that we are more likely to see them shine as a group as we are to having a single individual or two who stand out above the crowd. The reports coming out of the OTAs would appear to support this claim, as it seems like every day there has been a different receiver who has shone. I'm inclined to believe that come our season opener we will have a strong group of targets, enough different targets that it will become problematic for opposing defenses to decide who to focus upon.
87 comments
|
12 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Poll is closed may want to edit
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown
Thanks, Jon
Just caught that. It’s open now, plus edited to reflect the correct roster (Williams & Lyons were released between the draft and the publishing of the article).
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 11:57 AM MDT up reply actions
As a group, they will rock the league, but I also
believe Eddie will have a career year! =) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cONDEytz6qs
by jonmark93 on Jul 19, 2010 12:23 PM MDT reply actions 2 recs
works for me :)
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions
Rec'd
Love that video!
You posted it in a fanshot before, right?
That's quite a long handle there, G Funk. - That's what she said.
First (and only, in our lifetimes) team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! ( =
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Jul 19, 2010 7:05 PM MDT up reply actions
I'd like to see Gaffney, Royal, Decker and Thomas all have breakout years.
A guy can wish can’t he? LOL
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 12:48 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
If he makes as many first down catches
as I hope (expect), he will be the reason the offense controls the games, but the other receives will get the occasional long gains. Decker is key to this receiving core, I believe.
"Royal will hopefully return to his 1st year form?"
That almost reads like it was his fault, but wasn’t it acknowledged, maybe even by McDaniels, but perhaps also by others, that Eddie Royal had been underutilized in the WR position last year, because Orton (probably with it being his first year as the Bronco’s QB, and it also being his first year in the McDaniel’s system) had targeted Marshall as his “go-to guy,” therefore not giving Eddie as many looks as he perhaps could have?
Wasn't it also a case
that Royal was pretty much splitting time with Gaffney? I would think that would affect his ability to get into the flow of the game.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 3:49 PM MDT up reply actions
Both of those are true
Marshall did get a lot of throws – but he was catching (most of) them. Orton commented at the time that he was not used to having a ’go-to- receiver like that, and yes, he did overuse him. But Orton was also having trouble with he and the receivers being on the same page, and we have no way to judge who was correct. There were a lot of routes where the WR – including, but hardly limited to Royal – went one way and the pass was thrown as if the WR broke to the other side. It was a new system, and man, it showed.
McD and Orton have both commented that they need to get Eddie more involved, and they’ve worked on that in the offseason. Royal did split time with Gaffney. He also din’t play as well as he had the season before. That included lots of miscommunication, and we’ll never know who was right. Royal also has a habit of letting the ball come in to his body too much, and it makes it harder to hold on. There were a lot of factors that went into it, but he has showed a lot of skill in the past. I think that with the extra effort that McD, Orton and Royal are making that we can look for a lot of improvement. Just keeping him in the slot, rather than moving him so often, should help his game.
Gnothi Seauton
Well, I can't honestly say that I had watched Royal closely in '09...
…so I can’t argue that he did play as well as in his rookie season. I just remember others (I think both McDaniels and Orton) basically saying that they should have been looking more his way, and that they would rectify this in the future, so that’s why I had to say something in his defense.
I do remember defensive players manhandling Royal in ’08, but I also noticed that he had bulked himself up between his first and second season, and that showed me that Eddy is serious about his career as a Bronco. This, along with his success at VT and in his rookie season, gives me good cause to be optimistic.
Now, that being all said, I no longer think that Royal has the opportunity to take over as #2 WR position in McDaniels’ system. I do think, kinda’ like you, that he has the skills to take over for Stokely, and that Thomas and Decker will eventually be the #1 and #2 receivers.
And your other points are taken.
While all these played some role in the decline, Royal has also been
noted to have had trouble getting free off the line from his position last year. I agree with Doc; it’s rarely a single factor which accounts for a player’s success or failure; usually its a mixture of many circumstances and the player’s abilities.
Plus the immeasurable...
…pure desire. :-) Like I mentioned to Doc Bear, Royal obviously spent time bulking up between his first and second year, so I think that, if he continues to be diligent like that, then it’s reasonable to expect that to eventually translate on the field. His collegiate and first year stats indicates to me, at least, that he does have the desire and the talent. And with last year being his first year trying to adapt to McDaniels system, and with him being a little overlooked or maybe forgotten, as does seem to be generally acknowledged, then maybe that would explain the off-year. I’m just saying.
Yup- I think Royal comes out of the gate fast this year
New strength, new technique, but all the tapes the opposition will be studying will show are his troubles from last year. It’s a setup for him to take them by surprise!
I like his chances
When McD, Royal and Orton all agree in the media that they want to get him more into the game, and when they have the sense to make him the starting slot reciever in this offense, they’re giving him a great chance to perform. I think that 2008 was a nice way to show his skills. He won’t be sharing snaps with someone who has more experinece in the offense – and he knows his role well, now. That should give him the best shot at showing people that 2008 wasn’t a mirage.
Gnothi Seauton
Great article
I also love these reviews. BShrout, who do you think we will keep on the roster?
It seems to me in the past that the Broncos have run with 5 or 6 WRs on the roster
I could well be wrong on that number, that’s just what sticks in my mind without going back and looking at it.
If we keep 5-6, I would think it would be: Gaffney, Royal, McKinley, Thomas, Decker, and either Lloyd or Stokley. But given my history with these kinds of projections . . . we could be in for a surprise.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 3:52 PM MDT up reply actions
@BS..5-6 seems right from last.
McD made comment in OTA’s “if we keep 6 or 7, then they have to produce on st”.
With that comment and Stokley not playing st, I think he retires.
I too think it is Gaffney, Royal, McKinley, Lloyd, Thomas, Decker, and maybe Willis.
I like Alric Arnett for the ps.
Thanks for the quote from McDaniels
That’s what makes this site great, everybody has read/heard/seen something, and we often can fill in the gaps for each other.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 4:11 PM MDT up reply actions
+1!
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
I think he will keep 7 this year . I think last year he played to the defense in his play calling and game planning but this year Im expecting him to be ultra agressive
Gaffney, Royal, McKinley, Thomas, Decker, Lloyd and Stokley but if Willis or McKinley really have a great camp Stoke will be cut . Lloyd has 2 blocked punts to his credit and Mckinley can return kicks so they have the edge if needed for special teams .
The coaches preview will be out next week.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 3:53 PM MDT up reply actions
well done article my friend
I think our receivers have a lot of up side! That said we have two guys who have played big in the nfl at one point or another. Stokely & Gaffney.
Too many un proven players and (so far) one hit wonders to make me want to jump up and down for them.
I will probably do what i have done every year scream at my team when we make dumb plays and cheer when they make good ones!
Davis and Sharpe to the Hall!
"Teamwork divides the task and double the success."
- Unknown
by Jon Tollerud on Jul 19, 2010 2:26 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Agree with you on that one:
scream at my team when we make dumb plays and cheer when they make good ones!
If Coach McDaniels chooses to keep Gaffney, Royal and either Stokley or Lloyd, then add Decker, Thomas and McKinley, we should have a nice balance of vets and youth. The question will be how well the offense as a whole comes together.
They have potential. My hope is that they will realize that potential sooner, rather than later.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 3:56 PM MDT up reply actions
well that was interesting, that it didn't put the text IN the block quote
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 4:10 PM MDT up reply actions
These WRs remind me a lot of NE prior to adding Moss and Welker
No one jumps out and screams “THROW IT TO ME BECAUSE I AM THAT GREAT!” But as a whole they look pretty dang nice. You have multiple guys who have caught 50+ balls who understand their role and how to be an NFL WR. You have some young guys who if 1/3 of them turn into a solid NFL WR you have come out way ahead. And by solid I mean Brandon Stokley/Eddie Mac. Lots of 40-60 catch years. Maybe one or two 80+ years.
If only one of the young ones turns into say, Wes Welker, or perhaps Andre Johnson level of productivity then HOLY MOLY!!!
Yeah, I am drinking that kool aid.
User name pronounced Air-Ah-Miss Originally from my days in the SCA, became a gamer and forum tag because it is odd and it is a name I like
I think you've nailed the biggest question
How well will each of them pan out this year. If they live up to what appears to be their potential, we could be reasonably solid in the passing game. If not . . . it could turn ugly quickly.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 3:57 PM MDT up reply actions
Thomas
Only time will tell but the feeling here is Thomas will end up being the better receiver compared to Marshall. His skills might have been muted by the wishbone but what I did see engenders visions of greatness. This kid is the real deal. The only thing holding him back is experience.
"Peace, a journey without distance to a place we have never left."
by BroncoCUbuffs on Jul 19, 2010 4:23 PM MDT up reply actions
and potentially inconsistent hands...
… but that is to be determined, and its not like BMarsh had great hands either. Raw skill wise, I agree Bay-Bay has the potential to exceed Marshall simply because of his deep ball speed/skills… but until he actually shows something on the NFL field, potential is only worth a nickel on the dollar.
I like that he catches well over his shoulder
The only thing on-field that seemed to hold Marshall back was that it seemed that he always had to face the QB to make the catch. That made for some pretty interesting catches, and he is good at punishing people on YAC, but most big passes come in over the shoulder, and that’s something that Thomas seems to excel at. He should stretch the team vertically.
I don’t like putting too much on rookies, but just his ability on the vertical routes (yes, I know – all three of them, for him, but he’s learning fast acording to McD) creates something that Denver was clearly missing last year. He may not blow up the league, but he does give Denver a new look and a new option. I hope that he works out well.
Gnothi Seauton
agree...
His role will be very similar to how the Iggles used Djax as a rookie… run really fast and challenge the DBs deep… if the DEF doesn’t honor him, he’ll hit a couple big ones, and if they do honor him, that opens up space underneath for gaff and royal (reprising the Gaff/Welker roles in the NE 2007 offense).
Yea but look what happened after they added Moss and Welker
We really could use a quality, top notch receiver, McD did it in NE, wish he’d do it here.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
So you don't think the draft is a legitimate way to do that?
Or do you feel Thomas and Decker will not be quality top notch receivers?
Since FA came into play
The draft isn’t seen as the best way to fill key pieces. If you want improve your WR position, you bring in a talented FA and draft one or two. Teams that ignore FA’s are missing the main way to get better faster. There is a reason Miami’s and Baltimore’s passing games are going to be much better next season while we are looking for about the same with a little improvement. I like what we’ve done, Thomas and Decker have potential, but McD has shown time and again that he like FA, he will use FA, and if our WR’s don’t live up to par next season, a quality FA receiver will be brought in. He has done it before, and I don’t see why he wouldn’t do it again.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Jul 20, 2010 12:05 AM MDT up reply actions
Which FA do you think he should have brought in?
by Fan in Exile on Jul 20, 2010 9:38 AM MDT up reply actions
Boldin would have worked
Antonio Bryant as well, we just need a receiver that requires double coverage once in a while, cause as of now we don’t have one that scares the defense enough to stop them from blitzing. We play some great defenses next season and if we don’t have receivers that require more then man coverage, they will blitz us and as of right now, we can’t handle big rushes from teams like the Jets or Ravens. Having someone like Boldin or Bryant would require keeping the safeties out of the box, or if they don’t they could get beat. These guys aren’t the best in the league, but they do manage to scare defenses enough to watch them a bit closer.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Jul 20, 2010 12:20 PM MDT up reply actions
ummmm
I totally get what you are saying about Free Agents, I’ve been watching Ted Thompson try to rebuild the Packers without them for years.
But I don’t think that Bryant or Boldin are the answer. I have a much lower view of Bryant than you do. I just don’t see him as a double team kind of guy. Boldin would not have been the answer either. You can’t bring in one malcontent to replace another malcontent.
by Fan in Exile on Jul 20, 2010 12:49 PM MDT up reply actions
Thompson is one of the great head coaches out there
He has been very successful with the draft and developing players, same could be said for the Colts organization, but few teams are able to do that. Teams like the Patriots and Steelers are much better because of FA, so is Miami and Baltimore. While you may not have a high view of Bryant, after watching last season, he was double teamed most of the season and that was because his team really didn’t have anyone else. Had his team had a solid number 2 or 3, they would have been much more successful because Bryant was able to draw that second man. I don’t care if Bryant is top 5 or 10 or what, but if he’s good enough to clear a route for Gaffney, I could care less, because a guy who can pull coverage is almost more valuable when he’s not catching the ball.
As for Boldin, he has never really missed games, he hasn’t had off the field issues, he just wanted to get paid. Unlike Marshall he didn’t try to stir up a locker room, he just wanted a bigger contract, like almost everyone in the NFL. Sooner or later you will have to learn that you have to pay the guys to keep the guys.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Jul 20, 2010 12:57 PM MDT up reply actions
ummmmmm
Thompson can’t be a great head coach, since he is a GM.
We’ll just have to agree to disagree on Bryant. I would tend to think that if they were double teaming him it was because the Bucs didn’t have much else.
Boldin isn’t as bad as Marshall sure, but he’s still a malcontent. You may have forgotten stories like http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Anquan-Boldin-even-less-valuable-than-previously?urn=nfl,135311
I already know that you have to pay guys to keep them, so I’m not sure why you would even put that in.
by Fan in Exile on Jul 20, 2010 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions
Sorry that's what I meant
About Thompson. But I find it hard to think of a great passing team that didn’t have a great receiver. And most great receivers, even players like Jerry Rice had attitudes. Randy Moss has issues, T.O. has issues, Ochocinco has issues, Andre Johnson is beginning to show issues. Almost every great receiver has some personal issues, and it has been shown that teams have been able to deal with it. So it has become more and more clear, if a coach can win and keep his locker room together with big egos, it say more about the coach who doesn’t even try. And coach can lead a team of “team first” players, it take a great coach to control great players with big personalities. Look at some of the best, Belicheck, Parcells, Shanahan, Holmgren, Walsh, what made them great as their ability to control their teams even with big personalities. If you can’t control big personalities, you are going to struggle to coach in the NFL.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
I agree that the coach has to be able to deal with issues
but you know what these guys all have in common, “Randy Moss has issues, T.O. has issues, Ochocinco has issues, Andre Johnson ?”
Not one superbowl ring among all of them. If you just want to be a great passing team then you might want to have one of these guys. But they aren’t essential to winning the superbowl.
Rice had an attitude but he wasn’t a malcontent there’s a huge difference.
I should point out that I don’t think Boldin is that bad, I just think that in the situation getting rid of marshall, he would have been killed publicly for bringing in one malcontent to replace another. I don’t think Boldin was worth that. Really to be more precise I should say that I don’t think the diffence between Boldin and Thomas is worth taking that kind of a hit on.
I would say that Thompson is great with the draft, but his unwillingness to draft for need, or bring in a free agent has kept the team from making the leap from good to great over the past couple of years.
by Fan in Exile on Jul 20, 2010 2:16 PM MDT up reply actions
Rice made numerous complaints about not getting paid enough
But I guess it doesn’t matter, this season will show whether not we can move the ball through the air, and if we can’t, most of the blame will fall on Orton, but perhaps it should be placed on the receiving corp.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Hasn't McD used FA and the draft on receivers, MD?
Hmmm…We got Gaffney as a FA for a bargain, considering what he’s been able to do for the team in terms of getting his mates familiar with the system, as well as doing a nice job on receiving when he was targeted. We picked up Brandon Lloyd, partly, I suspect (just an opinion) that Orton liked throwing to him in Chicago. I don’t disagree with you on the draft part at all – I’ve made the same point that you can’t fully build that way – you can’t really expect all of your drafted players to work out. That’s true of FA too, I suppose, but somewhat less so, perhaps.
I suppose that Royal will show this year if his rookie year was a fluke, but I doubt that it was. He and Orton were just out of sync, and Royal wanted to be the slot guy. He’s got that role this year, and knows that he will both start and stay at the slot, which should help him.. He was a draft guy. Marshall also was through the draft, although his catches may not have made up for his antics. We got Stokes through FA, and drafted McKinley, who will have to work hard for a slot. When I look at everyone, it seems to be pretty even between drafted and FA even if this draft brought two very interesting candidates.
Decker is one of the few rookies who may be NFL ready, and although I never expect that much out of rookies, Thomas’ ability to force the D to respect the vertical game is something that we just haven’t had. It looks to me like McD is developing a team – using whatever system or method is available and trying to find whoever can help us. I like that approach. You can’t do it all in one year – or two, most likely – but you can set the pieces in motion and add as you go along. You can’t just build through one or the other – and Bill Walsh was huge on picking players who fit your scheme but didn’t fit who they were drafted by. He claimed that September was when the best team got better. I don’t know if that’s still true – that was 30 years ago, after all – but that was how he felt. I guess that the point is, you take them wherever you find them.
I do want to say that I fully agree with your point regarding bringing in FAs to positions that don’t pan out the previous year – if the right guy is there.. He did that in the draft, too, though – he bought a new DL, which looks very nice, and he drafted most of a new OL, which we will have to see about. He also drafted the WRs, so right now, it seems like he’ll got wherever he can. Given what he had to work with, that’s pretty normal. But if a certain group struggles? You’re right. It’s FA time
Gnothi Seauton
Thanks for the thoughts Doc
And I agree, I can’t think of a team built completely from FA, but when you see a glaring problem, free agents are a fix, and the draft adds depth.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Yes, the draft is also a massive crapshoot, but it's necessary
You often find your star players in there – they just take a little time to show it. Once in a while you get a guy who is great from year one, but that’s unusual. At least in FA you know that they can play the game. Draft can quickly add depth at certain positions (like Bruton and McBath last year), and you hope that they develop into starters or stars. For those two, either wouldn’t surprise me – they’re awfully good at a young age. Cox may turn out to be another, if he can keep his head on straight.
Why did we draft Eric Olsen? I like a lot of the draft, but I just don’t get that one. I didn’t get Seth Olsen last year, although an Iowa pedigree is rarely a bad thing. I guess TC will tell. There’s always the PS – I’m not sure that anyone is waiting in excitement for Eric to hit waivers. Any thoughts?
Gnothi Seauton
Our
wideouts are my favorite part of the team! Eddie Royal, Eric Decker, Brandon Stokley, Demaryius Thomas, Jabar Gaffney and Brandon Lloyd are all excellent and we’re lucky to have them! This will be our strongest area!
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Jul 19, 2010 2:42 PM MDT reply actions
“This will be our strongest area”
That is a big reach at this point. We have no idea what we have with Royal (based on his play under McD/with Orton), Decker and Thomas.
Denver: 32-32 until we're not.
Obviously
at this point, you are correct, McGeorge, I guess I should temper my enthusiasm, but I really think Decker and Thomas will be great. Royal will find a connection with Orton. If not, shame on me for being presumptuous.
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Jul 19, 2010 2:57 PM MDT up reply actions
Considering we don’t have any pass catching TEs, I’d guess we keep 6 WRs.
As Lloyd and Stoke don’t play ST, I guess it leaves the final spot for them to battle out at TC.
McKinley makes it.
Denver: 32-32 until we're not.
That's my guess also.
I would miss Stokely if he lost out to Lloyd- just wish Lloyd had given us enough reason to not have any question of who should stay; he always seemed to have the ability.
As I've mentioned elsewhere, Lloyd is an enigma to me
He played in only 2 games, had only 8 catches and 117 yards which was below pretty much all the other WRs. Yet . . .
his average per catch (14.6) was higher than Marshall (11.1), Gaffney (13.6) and Royal (9.3), and while he didn’t score any touchdowns, 62.5% of his catches resulted in a first down — as compared to Royal (62.1%) and Marshall (55.4%).
Now the big question, are these higher numbers the result of limited playing time, or a glimpse into what he could become? And can he do it consistently over a longer span of games.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 11:24 PM MDT up reply actions
He's had an odd career
He didn’t do much as a rookie, but the next two years, he pulled in 43 and 48 catches – not burning up the league, but good work. He developed a reputation as someone who wouldn’t go over the middle if he was going to get hit, and he was supposed to have drops at key times. He also can and did make absolute circus catches – his talent is there, if he uses it.
He went to Washington for a single year, He started 12 games but only caught 23 balls. The next year he played in 8 games, started 1 and caught 2 passes. At that point, Washington shipped him to Chicago, where he played in 11 games, started 5 and caught 26 balls. They were happy to let him go to Denver, apparently. He’s always had a reputation (and I don’t know the man, so this is just media commentary) for not really keeping his head in the game. I was surprised when Denver kept him but didn’t play him – scout team duty, and perhaps some extra time getting coached? He burned up the OTAs, but cjfarls, who generally knows his stuff, feels that he’ll fall apart in training camp.
I hope that he can overcome that rep and play – he has a lot of talent, and it has seemed like he hasn’t really focused on using it. He can catch the longer ball, and it would be a lot of fun if Denver actually develops a vertical game. He’s another one to keep an eye on.
Gnothi Seauton
My fear...
… isn’t that he’ll fall apart in camp. He’s a practice field wonder, winning starting spots for the 49ers, Skins and Bears. However, I’m scarred from having watched him in Washington, where he couldn’t catch a cold when needed, and made the fans pray the ball would go to a mediocre talent like Randle-El, who at least was consistent in his below-average play.
Lloyd will dazzle when he’s on…. and as soon as you hit that key third down, he’ll get shy across the middle, commit a dumb penalty, run the wrong route, or watch one bounce off his chest.
I don’t mind him as a #3 or #4… but if we rely on him too much I’ll be very nervous.
I have seen that
He does well in practice and then, where is he on gameday? There seems to be a missing piece somewhere.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
We have a couple
Graham does catch some passes and while we haven’t seen him play yet, Marquez Branson is listed as a TE and he was brought on because of his pass catching ability. They gave him a year to develop (he transfered from a Junior/Community college, so his technique needed some cleaning up) and are expecting him to play substantially. I would agree that we haven’t seen him in the NFL yet, but what I have researched on him suggests that he’ll play well. Time will tell. I wouldn’t be surprised if one of the UDFA’s makes the squad.
Gnothi Seauton
Not a tall group
There are only three guys listed taller than 6’ 0" on this list. I’m a bit surprised by that — my mental image of a WR is 6’ 4" and taller.
by DCJ on Jul 19, 2010 3:38 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
Depending on the source you use
WR’s in the NFL range in height from 5’9" (Steve Smith) to 6’4" (Plexico Burress). Also depending on the source you choose to use, the average ranges from 6’0 to 6’3
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 4:02 PM MDT up reply actions
By way of comparison -- using rosters currently posted @ NFL.com
The New England Patriots (the model McDaniels is using as a template) has 3 WRs over 6-foot, 5 @ 6-foot and 3 under 6-foot (for what it’s worth, NE’s leading receiver last year was Wes Welker @ 5’9"). Denver’s roster shows 4 over 6-foot, 3 @ 6-foot, and 3 under 6-foot.
Now, not all of these WRs will make the final 53, so it will be interesting to see how it breaks out by the end of Training Camp.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 4:09 PM MDT up reply actions
Yup- and I am one that was glad
though he (Dez) will have a very good carreer, I think Thomas may do even better. Time will tell, though, and nothing else will answer this question except the next 3-5 years.
Lots of Potential?
Stokely is over the hill and to many concussions
Lloyd . Good luck with that one.
Royal hopefully will rebound. Hopefully he just had difficulty learning the new offense
Gaffney showed potential last year.
Rookies – I hope they make a quick impact
No question Orton will be the Starter all year
"3 and Out Baby" I ride the short bus!
Yes, potential
as in they could rise to the occasion, or fall flat on their faces. Until we see them in game situations, it will be hard to tell.
Stokley — it wouldn’t surprise me to see him retire.
Lloyd — this player is an enigma to me. It seems like he should be better than he is, so the question becomes: why isn’t he? The intriguing thing about him is he is averaging over 55% of his catches going for a first down. Perhaps he will find a niche as a situational player.
Royal — had a lot heaped on him last year. Someone in a post here at MHR pointed out that in his rookie year, he was lining up off the line of scrimmage most of the time, which allowed him to use his quickness to its best advantage. Last year, he spent more time lining up on the line of scrimmage, where he wasn’t able to consistently escape being jammed. Hopefully, McDaniels will make some adjustments.
Gaffney — I think will have a solid year.
The rookies — IMHO, Denver’s WR corp’s year will be made or broken by how well the rookies, and 2nd year man McKinley perform.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 6:59 PM MDT up reply actions
I strongly doubt
McKinley plays a large role on this team. Very strongly doubt.
A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.
by A.J. Haefele on Jul 19, 2010 7:02 PM MDT up reply actions
You could well be right
My track record when it comes to predicting draft picks and roster selections is not particularly good. ;-p
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jul 19, 2010 7:07 PM MDT up reply actions
We'll just call it a gut feeling.
Especially with Honeycutt around, McKinley is going to really struggle to even make this roster.
A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.
by A.J. Haefele on Jul 19, 2010 8:40 PM MDT up reply actions
Royal adjustments
What Eddie really wants is to play the slot, which keeps him back off the line and defeats press coverage much more easily. He’d like to stop being a return guy, and wants to just play WR in the slot. Given the players we have this year, I hope that can be arranged. Either way, he’s only going to be in the slot during regular downs.
Gnothi Seauton
I'm cautiously optimistic about this group.
Thanks as always for a great review of the position. I firmly believe an injury will greatly influence the outcome of this position in training camp. I also think one receiver, not two or more will become a favorite Orton receiver during the year. Who will that be? I don’t know, but you could likely narrow it down to Gaffney, Royal, or Thomas. Stokley is going to need some karma to make the team I think.
Imagination is more important than knowledge. A. Einstein
PATRICK HONEYCUTT WILL LEAD US TO PROMISED LAND
A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.
Why?
A UDA that most haven’t heard of? At a reported 5’9" and 172, combined w/nothing special during his time in the college ranks equals serious doubts about the guy even making it thru camp.
by AllBroncsallday on Jul 20, 2010 9:04 AM MDT up reply actions
I'll be surprised if he does make the roster
Or even the PS…. But if he does either, it will mean he’s earned it! Another thing I am anxious to find out. ( =
That's quite a long handle there, G Funk. - That's what she said.
First (and only, in our lifetimes) team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! ( =
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Jul 20, 2010 9:46 AM MDT up reply actions
Ahh
You were kidding. I’ll go get my humor detector checked…. ;)
by AllBroncsallday on Jul 20, 2010 2:05 PM MDT up reply actions
You just gotta BELIEVE brotha.
BBBBBEEEEEELLLLLLLIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEVVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE in the power of the HONEYCUTT.
A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.
by A.J. Haefele on Jul 20, 2010 3:19 PM MDT up reply actions
Great job!
Easy to see that this group of wide receivers will be very strong and Orton will work well with them. Rec’d.
Awesome preview!
Great job with this! Thanks!
Proud Colorado native.
Bronco fan since 1973..
Future father of 2 NFL stars.
I am looking to see Gaffney given the chance to shine
I always thought he did his job well at the Pats and was impressed with him last season. I think we will see the receptions spread around these guys with Gaffney being the pick of them.
"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson
I feel the same, SteveUK
he’s had a career of being underestimated, but he’s got the skill to start. I suspect that McD wa serious when he said that they expect to not have a #1 receiver, but a different guy shining each week. It should be fun – and Please, Please, give us a vertical game to go with the short bread and butter!
Gnothi Seauton
I am pretty sure using Royal as a returner limited his WR plays
Not sure what the actual count was, but wasn’t it the case that after a return Royal sat out the first play or two and came in as a substitute WR on 3rd down or after a couple first downs? I mean he just did not come in after he ran back a kick. If the offense floundered a bit, which it often did, he just never came in or was in 3 receiver sets IIRC.
If someone else is doing the return duties that may get him involved more as a primary receiver.
According to Football Outsiders
He only had a catch rate of 47%, not someone I’d trust to throw to often. hope he gets that up. Comparitively, Marshall had a 66% catch rate and Welker had a 76% rate.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
And what is so strange about that...
… is that Royal caught over 70% of his passes as a rookie. Comparatively, BMarch’s 66% was about 10% higher than his career average…
And the other interesting think about FO’s catch rate stats is that individual receivers appear to carry a relatively consistent rate when they change teams and/or QBs… For perspective Welker catches over 70% of his passes in NE’s scheme with Brady, but I believe he was catching in the very high 60s% when he was with MIA and the luminary talents they had at QB. So it was thought scheme and QB quality were a relatively minor influence on catch rate.
Denver’s WR performance last year was complete bizarro land…. the guy with supposedly good hands (Royal) couldn’t catch a cold, and BMarsh (who I don’t think ever exceeded 55% previously) is all of a sudden in the territory of the elite hands guys.
To put these catch rates in perspective ~60% is average, above 65% is very good, above 70% is amazing.
[Note: It wasn’t just Denver either… Chris Chambers had almost always caught less than 50% of his balls when in MIA and SD… yet last year caught above 60% I believe…. just a wierd year for catch rate stats, that I have no explanation for….]
Thomas
I would vote none if that were an option. Otherwise, I have to go with Thomas. If he is fully healthy he seems to have the best raw talent, spelled size and speed. He was also a first rounder. While he is short on time in the passing game, he ought to be able to catch on quickly.

by 



























