almost 2 years ago
ArrowSpread
18 comments
3 recs |
Comments
I am curious about a few things in the article itself:
Healthy team – The Chiefs have been the 4th healthiest team in the NFL over the past three years (according to the FO adjusted games lost metric). Haley’s conditioning program (and the influx of young players since 2008) has to have contributed to this.
Haley has been there for one season…
FO picked safety as the biggest need on the defensive side and center as the biggest need on the offensive side
Safety was a good choice, but Wiegmann didn’t play very well in my book last year. He had more penalties than normal for him, 6, and just looked a lot slower than he looked one year before. Teams facing the Broncos took advantage of the middle of our line consistently. He will be 37 later this month.
They are projecting Tamba Hali to have a season similar to Elvis Dumervil’s 2009
going from 8.5 sacks to 17? He is a good player but I would be hesitant to predict anyone doubling their sack total in one season [unless they only had a couple sacks of course].
Gutting our offense [Cutler and Marshall… are they including Scheffler I guess?] is humorous but I am willing to say the division is weak. Considering we didn’t win games with those players, I hardly see it as a big deal. Gutting would also imply we don’t have anything — we have a lot of youth, who have proven nothing in the NFL at this point but were skilled in college.
Good luck to you all, except against us =)
Hopefully you can win all of your games against the Raiders and Chargers!
Doom
Went from 5 sacks in 2008 to 17, so the Hali prediction isn’t that outrageous
Otherwise I agree with your problems with the article. I don’t the the Chiefs have the talent or the potential to ever be consistantly dominant in any aspect of the game.
by Warren Todd on Jul 9, 2010 1:55 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Being a Chiefs fan
It’s hard to take not getting any respect at all, but we’ve only won like 10 games in the last 3 years, so i guess we’ll take what we can get. I will promise you that this team is going to come out fired up and pissed off about not getting any respect, and before this season is over, they will earn your respect by play alone.
FWIW...
Comparison between Doom and Hali so far in their careers…
_ Sacks (Doom and Hali, respectively):_
2006: 8.5, 8
2007: 12.5, 7.5
2008: 5, 2
2009: 17, 8.5
Total: 43, 27
Prior to the 2009 season, Dumervil already showed the ability to get double-digit sacks, Hali appeared to have regressed every year. I won’t make any judgements on the future.
"Everything is a lie. Except that last statement."
"God I'm excited for those two to fail miserably." - SBNation writer Andrew Sharp on Josh McDaniels and Tim Tebow.
Quitter's People United Member #18
by Tempestuous Binary on Jul 11, 2010 7:42 AM MDT up reply actions
Championships aren't won on paper.
Ask the chargers.
Comparing Michael Lombardi to Bill Williamson is like comparing an In-N-Out Cheeseburger to a sh## sandwich.
Williamson would probably eat both – no questions asked.
by Joe Medina on Jul 9, 2010 1:22 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Sounds like they are trying hit up the Missouri-Kansas area for some readership!
Josh McDaniels-All he wants to do is win a MF'in game!
by RockyMountainThunder on Jul 9, 2010 2:22 PM MDT reply actions
They would be off their heads if they had us winning it.....I just dont see how the Chargers aint favorites...on paper!
You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!
I agree
But i think the AFC West is up for grabs by any team in the division, even the Raiders.
by CPT.Caveman on Jul 9, 2010 4:49 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree with this statement
however at this time I think Denver has the best chance, San Diego then the Chiefs and Raiders will duke it out for last.
While I think that the free agency and draft all 3 teams (Denver, Kansas City and Oakland) went out and got some awesome prospects, we will see if those prospects turn into a good investment or not.’
I see San Diego as dropping the ball, so to speak during this season.
daaayuuuuum! you gonna take that KB?!? lol -Broncs55
Absolutely not. KB is a function of aggression and rage, the derivative of which can be traced back to my childhood.-KentuckyBronco
PS3 ID: KoRnHo|ed
I agree.
Way too many unknowns. Can the Raiders coach their talent? Can SD deal with aging, retraining, and locker room issues? Can Haley figure out how to make the turnaround happen? Who is this new Denver team?
-Harvey J. Neptune
"Practice doesn't make perfect. PERFECT practice makes perfect." - Vince Lombardi
Interesting
I generally think FO does good analysis, and can see a few things that will way heavily against us in their computer projections:
1) End of year collapse… teams that are improving at the end of the year often are teams that finally “got it”, and improve the following season. What they don’t calculate in their projections is WHY the collapse happened… in our case it was a) screwball players no longer with the team, b) lack of depth on d-line (fixed), and c) injuries to o-line and rookie RB hitting the wall (we’ll see).
2) They always have a semi-subjective rating of team stability… it improves the analysis, but is subjective and given they know almost nothing about the AFCW, its likely wrong. So we’ll get penalized for losing Nolan and the hub-bub around Marshall and Doom’s contract, even though IMO these are kinda non-issues in reality.
3) Age decline… they will continue to project our DBs to suck, and eventually they will be right. But because they don’t look at backup quality, they’ll ignore the fact that we have promising players like McBath, Cox, Jones, etc. in reserve.
Last year for many of these same reasons they predicted us with 4 wins… my guess is we can add 2-3 wins to whatever they are projecting for us this year based on things I know they are underprojecting us for, and it will be relatively accurate… My guess is they have us at ~6 wins, so that would be about right.
Also remember their projections only explain about 40% of the variability in a season… so all their projections are basically +/- 50% just on randomn craziness like fumble luck, injuries, etc.
Its interesting that KC is getting the boost in the projection… but understandable too… they had a lot of young guys last year that we realistically should expect to improve, though my guess is they are overrating Weigman, etc. who to me looked totally toast last year, which will hurt both their pass and particularly the run game. In addition, they will give KC a boost for stability, and us a penalty simply because Nolan left, even though I expect both teams to be improved on that front.
Most significant is the projected SD decline… which could make things real interesting.
I expect the division to be very competitie…
End of year collapse
I think it was a combination of several things
1- After 6 games teams saw what the Broncos had to offer on both sides of the ball.
Offensive side: Was to throw short passes or WR screens but nothing over 20 yards down the field.
Defensive side: Was to blitz, blitz, and blitz.
More than anything IMO was the fact that you guys got rid of your cancers in the locker room.
Here are a few of my theories about the decline last season.
http://www.milehighreport.com/2010/2/20/1318605/orton-theories
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
Why try to boast and post it here? lol, sad attempt, not even us Raider fans will come to other blogs to
post a writers assertions about the our divisional chances. Hey go try and post it on the Charges blog and Raiders blog for us to have a good laugh… we will see what happens once the season starts as we are all at 0-0, enough BS.
The RaiderLaker





































