Ring of Fame - Randy Gradishar
With Floyd Little finally getting honored in the Hall of Fame, Randy Gradishar now becomes the greatest Hall of Fame omission in Denver Broncos history. Gradishar succeeded everywhere he went on the field of play. Selected number fourteen overall in the first round in the 1974 NFL draft by the Broncos, he quickly asserted himself as one of the leagues premier inside linebackers.
Gradishar became a Pro Bowler in just his second year, but his dominance really began to assert itself after the Broncos switched to the vaunted 3-4 Orange Crush in 1976. His primary responsibility was to control the inside rushing lanes and short passing. His intelligence combined with phenomenal instincts allowed him to be the foundation upon which the Orange Crush excelled.
Herein lies the problem for Gradishar’s potential of getting elected into the Hall of Fame. The general consensus of the voters is that Gradishar’s stats were padded by the Denver score keepers. An easy assumption to make considering the incredible amount of tackles amassed by Gradishar during his ten year career. Currently, the newly reinvigorated MHR Hall of Fame Committee is scouring old tapes of Gradishar in the hopes of proving or disproving this assumption. The goal, however, is that Gradishar’s stats shouldn’t really matter when considering him for the Hall of Fame.
The point is, how great would the Orange Crush defense have been without Gradishar? Could the Orange Crush have ranked third in fewest rushing yards per game during Gradishar’s tenure as inside linebacker? Behind only the Steelers and Cowboys, two of the best teams from that era. Not only that, the Broncos Orange Crush defense gave up the second fewest yards per rush during that same span. Both of these stats reflect directly upon the job Randy Gradishar had – Stop the inside rushing lane. So pray tell me, who stopped these running backs?
Gradishar was so dominating that he was elected to seven consecutive Pro Bowls, from 1977 until he retired in 1983. He was also NFL Defensive Player of the Year in 1978. Gradishar’s accolades should be more than enough to get him nominated to the Hall of Fame. Yet 27 years have past and nothing. This injustice must be corrected.
Tackle stats set aside, how can NFL history be written without mentioning Randy Gradishar and the Orange Crush defense of the 1970’s? It can’t, yet is. Hopefully we Bronco fans can begin to focus on re-branding Gradishar as one – if not thee – greatest short yardage inside linebacker in NFL history. His leadership and talent helped solidify the third best defense of the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. He must be given a bust in the hallowed grounds of Canton.
29 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can I vote "other"?
I don’t think there’s any question that Shannon Sharpe is the biggest omission right now. And don’t be so sure he’ll get in this year, he was a lock in our eyes the past two years as well.
Rod Smith isn’t even eligible yet.
Of those, I’d go with Gradishar too though.
by black_knight101 on Aug 10, 2010 6:28 AM MDT reply actions
I believe Rod Smith will be eligible for the 2011 class...didn't he retire in 2006?
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
agreed
Next year’s first year candidates include:
Marshall Faulk
Neon Deon
The Bus
Curtis Martin
In addition to those notables that didn’t make it this year:
Chris Carter
Tim Brown
Andre Reed
etc…
That said, if Shannon doesn’t get in on his 3rd year of eligibility… the travesty will have reached all time levels!!!
yikes.
i’d be interested to read the reasoning of those who voted mecklenberg. i bet it goes something like,“who’s randy gradishar again?” sadly, it’s about the same argument the HOF committee seems to use.
personally, i don’t think meck is a HOFer. louis wright though, is 1a to gradishar’s 1 in being looked over.
Steve Atwater should at least make the poll.
Denialists replace the open-minded skepticism of science with the inflexible certainty of ideological commitment.-- Michael Spector
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 10, 2010 8:48 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
ouch...major oversight.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
Rod Smith and TD
might actually make it. I think the problem is both Randy and Karl aren’t seen outside the Denver media market. So the national groups just ignore them. Great men and great players in their day. Sadly I think alot of the voters need to see the faces in the spotlight frequently whether it be on Tv or in print. That isn’t happening for Denver’s great players outside of TD, and he is just a face on NFLN. That isn’t to say those getting in don’t deserve the honor, but the Denver player’s faces just don’t seem to be shown around the country like say Emmet Smith or Jerry Rice did. That needs to change for the five players above to be considered IMO.
"I cannot give you a formula for success, but I can give you the formula for failure: Try to please everybody."
You have to be careful
We could debate for days, and come up with probably 10 players ( Or more) from the past that we all agree would deserve hall consideration. I think all teams could do this. Would we really want to water down the Hall in this way though? Just sayin.
Bronco Champions are being forged as we speak.
Yeah, just 3 Hall of Famers for such a storied franchise is a joke
To put that in perspective, the raiders have 14, the Chiefs have 10, and even the lowly Chargers have 9. The Broncos are the most under-represented franchise in the HoF (excluding expansion franchises of course).
It wouldn’t be watering down the Hall. It would be giving the Broncos the recognition they deserve. If Gradishar had played his career for say, the Giants do you really think he would still be waiting and hoping to get into the HoF? No way, he’d be in. Keeping Broncos Greats out of the Hall solely because they played for the Broncos brings the HoF’s credibility into question.
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination."
- Andrew Lang (1844-1912)
The question is whether the Hall is already watered down or not
Some (most) teams have representation in the Hall that belies the standards that HOF voters insist they hold. Denver, to date, simply hasn’t been one of the tributaries to that pool of players.
Bear Claw Chris Lapp: You've come far pilgrim.
Jeremiah Johnson: Feels like far.
Bear Claw Chris Lapp: Were it worth the trouble?
Jeremiah Johnson: What trouble?
by Jeremy Bolander on Aug 10, 2010 10:58 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
even I had to go with Gradishar on this...
TD is 2nd though…just needed a couple more years to be a shoe in…stupid brian griese.
Have a good time all the time...that's my motto. - Viv Savage
TD
i’m even more convinced after a weekend of watching emmitt smith highlights packages, which consist of 10 plays of emmitt jogging through a 14 foot wide hole for a touchdown. TD was twice the back smith was, and he easily passes the “can’t write NFL history without him” test.
Glad I’m not the only one who blames Griese for the loss of TD (I also blame him for the loss of Sharpe for a couple years). But honestly, the real blame lies with Shanahan — if Shanny hadn’t been so intent on proving Griese was a real QB, and then hadn’t rushed TD back from his injury, TD might have contributed a few more years.
I saw Rich Jackson play and I know he belongs!
“Dr. Z, Paul Zimmerman, said that Tombstone Jackson was perhaps the finest overall defensive end and pass rusher he ever saw, a surefire Hall of Famer if he would have had a longer playing career, in a bigger media market. As it was Jackson will be remembered as a great one, only by a handful of football insiders, including those who lined up with and against him.”
43 sacks in 67 games and the man who taught Lyle Alzado the techniques of the position.
I could have been a Rhodes Scholar, except for my grades.
-- Duffy Daugherty
I agree
He also changed the game with his lethal head slaps. They say he broke someone’s helmet in two with one of those. They made that move illegal in large part becaue of Jackson.
After reading about Lionel Taylor, he too would be a sure fire HoFer if he would have played longer.
But first things first, Gradishar has to get in!
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination."
- Andrew Lang (1844-1912)
Hmm lets see...
Austin Gonsoulin
Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.
by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Aug 10, 2010 11:30 AM MDT reply actions
Super Bowl participation
There is no question that the Broncos are underrepresented in the HofF. Just look at Super Bowl participation. The Broncos have played in 6 Super Bowls. That is in the Top 10, perhaps Top 5 of all NFL teams. This indicates the Broncos have had quality players over the years. We have played in more Super Bowls than any other AFC West team, yet have the fewest players in the HofF.
It’s a travesty and a sham. It’s a travesham.
SB follow up
And to clarify, we are #3 on the list. Only Dallas (8) and Pittsburgh (7) have played in more Super Bowls.
What, no Atwater?
Steve “The Assassin” Atwater has a ring, over 1100 tackles, and arguably the best highlight reel among modern players. Yes, I know, the Hall discriminates against defensive players in general and safeties in particular, but Atwater certainly deserves to be in the conversation.
The issue with Atwater.
Is the fact that he was a run stopping, hard hitting machine, And so he only had 24 ints his whole career, and to the HOF people, thats all they can see.
Quit drinking the Kool-Aid and start drinking the good stuff, and everything is always alright.
by Chuck "DeadDrunk" Breedlove on Aug 10, 2010 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions
I agree,
Chuck: Here is an example: Paul Krause made a lot more INT’s in his career, but in SB VIII, he was one of the Viking secondary players that was defenseless against Csonka. Atwater wouldn’t have been. Now, who’s the HOFer? Someone who can make easy INT’s in zone coverage, or a terminator like Steve? I thought so.
I love when the pundits claim he was a 'liability' against the pass...
…because it is such a load of bunk that it borders on satire. Not only did he probably give up countless interception opportunities in favor of the big hit, but for a long period of his career, opposing coaches had to abandon the middle of the field in the passing game by halftime because the WR’s were playing scared and distracted. His psychological effect on opposing offenses— right down to RB’s who became increasingly tentative hitting holes— didn’t come through on TV as much as at the stadium. Its another reason why media guys should have no say on who gets into the HoF. It’s like having 3rd graders hand out the Pultizers. If they can’t see beyond the tangible, then they have no business deciding the legacy of another professional.
Denialists replace the open-minded skepticism of science with the inflexible certainty of ideological commitment.-- Michael Spector
by PredominantlyOrange on Aug 10, 2010 2:58 PM MDT up reply actions
I don't disagree...
…about INTs being all many voters see, but Atwater averaged 107 tackles per season, compared to Ronnie Lott’s 82. There have always been two types of safeties, the opportunistic cover safeties who get the INTs, and the head hunter safeties who dominate the running game and strike fear in the hearts of WRs. Atwater, like Dennis Smith who mentored him, is a prime example of the latter.
In the end, when voters see his highlight reel, they will marvel at his hit on Christian Okoye that still echoes today, and his collision in the SB that left the field littered with bodies. Yeah, I know, safeties get no respect in Canton, but the Hall is not complete without the Assassin.
yeah...my fav defensive player of all time and I forgot to add him to the list.
I’d laugh if I weren’t so embarrassed. :)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA

by 
































