The Rest of the West
The Broncos are currently tied for 2nd place in the AFC West with an 0-1 record. Fortunately for them (and us, as fans), the rest of the AFC West seems to have just as many question marks as the Broncos. During the offseason, we would hear whispers - and sometimes shouts - of what the AFC West teams might do or what they could do. Well, we have one game under our belt and finally have some concrete film to sink our teeth into.
The AFC West is just as unpredictable as always. The San Diego Chargers are down, the Kansas City Chiefs are up and the Oakland Raiders are.... well, they are the Raiders.
The Kansas City Chiefs
Last Week
The Chiefs are 1-0 for the first time since 2005. In that year, the Broncos went to the AFC Championship Game. Makes you wonder...
Anyways, last week the Chiefs scored the upset victory of the week. They were the beneficiary of a wet night, an intense home crowd in a brand new stadium, and outstanding production from young players like Javier Arenas and Jamaal Charles. The Chiefs beat the Chargers 21 to 14.
To be honest, their offense wasn't spectacular. They only amassed 197 yards of total offense and were 1 for 11 on third downs. That's just terrible. They were fortunate in that they scored on special teams and were able to have a couple of big plays but they don't look to be a consistent offense, right now. It will be interesting to see if they can be a more consistent offense in the coming weeks.
Something that did stand out to me was the Chiefs defense. What a statement they made in the fourth quarter with that goal line stand. That was purely outstanding. The Chiefs opened the New Arrowhead Stadium with a grand performance, but the key element in keeping the Chiefs at the top of the division, as I mentioned earlier, will be developing a consistent offense. Big plays can win games, but they can't be counted upon every week to win every game. There has to be some consistency.
Notable Injuries
The biggest name on this list is obviously Tyson Jackson. At this point in the week, it is tough to say whether or not he would play, but the Chiefs are definitely more complete with him coming after the quarterback.
KC Injuries
Tyson Jackson
DE
Knee
Did Not Participate In Practice
Wallace Gilberry
DE
Back
Limited Participation in Practice
Tamba Hali
LB
Foot
Limited Participation in Practice
Ryan O'Callaghan
T
Groin
Limited Participation in Practice
This week
Next up for the Chiefs is the Cleveland Browns. After beating the Chargers, it will be a major step backwards if they can't come out of this week with their 2nd victory of the season. The Browns couldn't beat the Tampa Bay Buccaneers last week, which I think speaks volumes of their team. Peyton Hillis fumbled twice and Jake Delhomme threw 2 interceptions. The game could be fun to watch, though, if Cribbs and Arenas go back and forth with outstanding special teams plays.
I fully expect the Chiefs to run wild on the Browns. Expect a lot of Jamaal Charles and Thomas Jones in this one, although Cassel could impress people against the Browns secondary, as well. The Browns did allow 2 TD passes from Josh Freeman last week.
I'm not quite ready to say that the chiefs have fully arrived as playoff contenders and I don't think that any result from this game will be able to sway my opinion one way or the other. The Browns just aren't an opponent that measures up well to anyone, so I'm reluctant to take an overwhelming Chiefs win as evidence that they are vastly improved since last season. I will, however, be watching the chiefs very intently over the next few weeks to see if they can keep things going in a positive direction. Are they for real? Time will tell.
The San Diego Chargers
Last week
On the flip-side, the Chargers lost against the Chiefs. Philip Rivers looked very frustrated. We already addressed a little bit of their game in the Chiefs section above, but the biggest debate concerning the Chargers week 1 game was whether or not they are still the same old Chargers. Are they an underachieving team that will turn it on after a few weeks like they have in the past or are they just average? Has their "window closed"? It's tough to say after one week. It is definitely something to ponder as the losses start to pile up, though.
I just wonder what the preseason hype was about. The Chargers, at this point, don't look like a playoff team, let alone a Super Bowl team. Darren Sproles was nonexistant, Philip Rivers looked out of sync with his receivers, they couldn't stop Jamaal Charles, their special teams couldn't stop Javier Arenas, their pass rush couldn't get consistent pressure on Matt Cassel (which has proven easy to do over the past year), and their offense couldn't put points on the board despite gaining 389 yards. They were 27% on 3rd downs, which isn't nearly as bad as the Chiefs 9% 3rd down completion percentage. The bottom line is that the Chargers have a long way to go if they want to get back in the playoffs in 2010.
Notable Injuries
Long-snapper David Binn has been placed on Injured Reserve and will miss the remainder of the 2010 season with a hamstring injury. The guys at Bolts From the Blue think that this is a much bigger deal for their special teams than is being talked about. David was recently been named a Special Teams captain (for the 1st time), is the longest-tenured Chargers player and, according to Bolts from the Blue, might just be
the greatest long-snapper in the history of the position
That is some high praise, especially for a guy I had never heard of before. So, if you're watching the game next week and see a bad snap... now, you know why.
SD Injuries
Stephen Cooper
LB
Knee
Did Not Participate In Practice
Jacob Hester
RB
Foot
Limited Participation in Practice
Shawne Merriman
LB
Achilles
Limited Participation in Practice
This week
The Jacksonville Jaguars seem to be the standard measuring stick of the AFC West. The Chargers will take on the Jacksonville Jaguars at Qualcomm Stadium in San Diego during week 2. The Jags just finished playing the Broncos last week, so it will be interesting to see how they play against the Chargers.
The Chargers had trouble against Kansas City's special teams unit last week. The Jags were no slouches, though, during week 1. With their returns, they amassed 166 yards returning. If San Diego can't slow down Tiquan Underwood, it could be another frustrating day for Philip Rivers and the Chargers.
Another area of concern for the Chargers is their run defense. Last week, the Chiefs busted some huge gains on the ground with Jamaal Charles. The Jacksonville Jaguars present a different obstacle with Maurice Jones-Drew. He is arguably the most complete back in the league. Not only is he quick and tough to bring down, he also possesses great hands that make him a solid receiver out of the backfield. San Diego could have their hands full if MJD gets lose. MJD is likely to be hungry for the endzone, as well, as he is still eying his first TD of the season.
The Oakland Raiders

Last Week
The Raiders lost to the Tennessee Titans 38 to 13. If you watched the game, it was barely that close. The Raiders were absolutely embarrassed on the road in Tennessee. The only thing that worked on Sunday was their running game. Unfortunately for the Raiders, they were so far behind that the running game was mitigated in favor of the passing attack. The Raiders were 3 for 14 on third down. Yes... 3 for 14 on third down.
The Titans were 8 for 15 on third downs. They also ran for 205 yards on 35 carries (5.3 ypc). The Raiders weren't too shabby on the ground (135 yards on 25 carries which is 5.4 ypc). However, they also lost a fumble and threw an interception. What should worry the Raiders fans more than anything else is the shocking 4 fumbles during the game. They ended up recovering 3 of their fumbles, but having 4 fumbles in a game should scare you. I always thought that having Jason Campbell as my QB would be scary enough but the Raiders are just finding all kinds of new ways to lose games, despite the preseason chatter that claimed the Raiders would be a .500 team... or better.
Notable Injuries
Lots and lots of names on this list, but since it is so early in the week it is hard to determine which of these names actually mean anything. What I did find was an article that said Robert Gallery may not play.
Nnamdi Asomugha
CB
Groin
Did Not Participate In Practice
Hiram Eugene
S
Hamstring
Did Not Participate In Practice
Robert Gallery
G
Hamstring
Did Not Participate In Practice
Travis Goethel
LB
Back
Did Not Participate In Practice
Chris Johnson
CB
Neck
Did Not Participate In Practice
Walter McFadden
CB
Hamstring
Did Not Participate In Practice
Chaz Schilens
WR
Knee
Did Not Participate In Practice
Richard Seymour
DE
Hamstring
Did Not Participate In Practice
Desmond Bryant
DT
Elbow
Full Participation in Practice
Michael Bush
RB
Thumb
Full Participation in Practice
This Week
In week 2, the Raiders will play the St. Louis Rams. The Rams lost to the Arizona Cardinals last week, but the Rams didn't appear to be pushovers as in years past. They will sling the rock with Sam Bradford but that doesn't mean that the Rams aren't happy to hand the ball off to Stephen Jackson when they get a chance. Stephen Jackson has been the Rams offense for years and I don't expect that to change in 2010. Now, keep in mind that Stephen Jackson is listed on the injury report for the Rams and was held out of practice on Wednesday. However, reports are saying that it was purely cautionary and that he is expected to play on Sunday.
Time will tell if the Raiders can find their offense and defense in 2010. They added a bunch of pieces in the offseason but it remains to be seen if guys like Rolando McClain or Lamarr Houston can step up. Although their defense has some questions yet to be answered, I think they stand a good chance of showing off their running game against the Rams. The reason being because the Rams probably won't get out to a huge early lead like the Titans did. If it's a fairly close game or the Raiders have a lead, expect to see a heavy dose of Michael Bush, if he plays, and Darren McFadden.
Can the Raiders Defense stop Stephen Jackson and the rookie Sam Bradford? That remains to be seen, but it will be interesting to see how the Raiders talented secondary can fare against an inexperienced quarterback in Sam Bradford. Will Bradford struggle or will the Rams decide to use a bit more Stephen Jackson than they did in week 1?
There you have it, MHR. That is the rest of the West. Keeping track of the Raiders so you don't have to.
58 comments
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
haha, wow, I did that twice, too.
Fixed. My bad.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by Troy Hufford on Sep 16, 2010 3:03 PM MDT up reply actions
lol, well I'm glad my mistake was good for something.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by Troy Hufford on Sep 21, 2010 3:42 PM MDT up reply actions
It seems like the whole AFC West can't convert on 3rd downs. I know we were only 30%
converting also. That won’t win you games. We definitely need a better percentage against seattle if we are going to make a statement and win.
Well, not many teams have done well on third downs in week 1. It just seems to happen that way, I guess.
Even last year, you could look at the Broncos vs Bengals and that game was UGLY with a capital “U”, “G”, “L” and “Y”. It just takes teams a few weeks to get rolling, but still… 1 for 11 is just bad.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by Troy Hufford on Sep 16, 2010 3:04 PM MDT up reply actions
Great read KB. Thanks mate!
You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
Call me a kool-aid drinker, but here is what I see vs the AFC West:
Denver scored the most points on offense (KC had a ST TD). They played on the road. Had just 26 yds total yards less than SD, but take into acct Denver had 40 more yds in penalties, and you have a better offensive performance from Denver. Denver 21 first downs to SD 18. I’ll give a little benefit to SD and the weather, but not much. We played in some rain too.
The Defense created no turnovers, and the penalties killed us. Overall, I think the AFC West is very wide open (except for the Raiders) and I think we have the best chance to have both sides of the ball “click”. The run D will improve.
Always remember Goliath was a 40 point favorite over David.
-- Shug Jordan
by Orange and Blue on Sep 16, 2010 7:47 AM MDT reply actions
Special Teams is a pretty large part of the equation
It sounds like you’re downplaying it.
Eh, 7-9... To be revisited during the Bye week.
The door to the playoffs for the Chiefs
Goes through Cassel. You’re special teams can’t carry you every game. They will certainly help – as will Jamal Charles – but 1 for 11 on 3rd down really hamstrings your team.
Why does Madden suck at ranking the Broncos so much?
Can't disagree with that
As do turnovers, and giving up a short field.
Eh, 7-9... To be revisited during the Bye week.
Yes the Broncos learned that the hard way Sunday...
The Chiefs have a lot of young talented players and that angers me. As much as I want you to be a 4-12 team for eternity it’s not going to be like that.
I just hope it takes you three years to put it all together and that we can put it all together this year.
Why does Madden suck at ranking the Broncos so much?
I figure if an inconsistent offense, a terrible run defense, and no semblance of a return game can get us 4 wins, then a slightly improved offense with some added weapons, an improved defense (or perhaps moderately?), and a vastly improved return game can net us a few more wins.
Just have to continue that progress into week 2 vs the Browns, in hopefully more favorable field conditions. The forecast calls for more rain.
Eh, 7-9... To be revisited during the Bye week.
I certainly expect your team to win more games.
"It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..."
by Alan_Smithee on Sep 16, 2010 9:28 AM MDT up reply actions
LOL!
"It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..."
by Alan_Smithee on Sep 16, 2010 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions
Very large
Not so much the ability to score the TDs – but as we saw in Jacksonville if the opposing ST is able to consistently shorten their feild good things will happen. KC does appear to have that ability – whereas the Broncos really need to start showing that ability.
I expect SD in decline and KC on the rise
With the positive moves made by KC I would expect to see Castle to improve his performance as the year progresses. They have a bunch of real studs – but still have a bunch of holes. About a .500 team this year – to the low side most likely.
SD has taken four steps backwards and it showed on Monday night. A team in decline but still a team ready to contend. I see 10 wins and a wild card for them – dropping one to KC will really come back to haunt them in December/January.
I dont see Cassel able to play at a higher level than the highest-paid-backup-not-a-backup in the league that he is right now.
KC will be getting their QB of the future next yr.
Always remember Goliath was a 40 point favorite over David.
-- Shug Jordan
by Orange and Blue on Sep 16, 2010 8:00 AM MDT up reply actions
Cassel is a mid level starter
I would agree that he is not worthy of his contract, nor is he anyones long term answer. He is competent and able to read a defense if give the coaching and time. He will improve over the course of the year – aided in very large part by the running game.
1. San Diego 10-6 (in the real world, they miss Jackson. In AJ Smith’s fantasy world, they don’t miss Jackson)
2. Denver 8-8
3. KC 6-10 (Cassel sucks)
4. Oakland 4-12 (I’m keen on the under)
Denver: 32-33 until we're not.
1. & 2. Denver and San Diego 9-7
3. Chiefs 7-9 (Cassel sucks but Charles is very, very good)
4. Oakland 2-18 (Somehow they find a way to lose 2 additional games more than they played)
Why does Madden suck at ranking the Broncos so much?
you mean four additional?
Quitter's People United Member #396
"It was Joe Maysesque" -BTID
"I cussed a lot more in 2008 than any other season I can remember." -McGeorge
or have we gone to the 18 game season already?
Quitter's People United Member #396
"It was Joe Maysesque" -BTID
"I cussed a lot more in 2008 than any other season I can remember." -McGeorge
Why make a post talking about how you think something is pointless
That transcends the pointlessness of the original point which you claim is pointless doesn’t it?
Why does Madden suck at ranking the Broncos so much?
Because we are FANS!
Fans do that sort of thing – try to gauge how good this team is against that team … how good is that player against this player …. half the fun of being a football fan is anticipating next week and guessing at the outcomes.
Basically, this division is anyone's for the taking
is the gist, eh?
The Chargers still deserve to be called the favorites until further notice but anyone who thinks they are once again head and shoulders above the other teams haven’t been paying attention. They are vulnerable due to injuries and absences (and other reasons) and it’s up to one of the other teams to seize the day. I don’t see that part becoming clear for at least a month. But Denver can certainly make a case starting Sunday.
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.
And I do think they're going to miss the long snapper
won’t be The Difference Maker overall but will have an affect, just as it would if Denver lost Paxton.
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.
You Could
even tell in the playoff loss to the Jets if you paid enough attention, that the Chargers had peaked. They’re not tough enough to hit the Ravens in the mouth, (heck they couldn’t even handle the Jets) while the Dolphins and Pats are both strong and the Broncos have been on the verge of toppling them. Of course, Dolts fans will go back to being their loser apathetic selves hanging out on the beach in 60 degree weather
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Sep 16, 2010 2:37 PM MDT up reply actions
Well, I think what KB is getting to is that our division is wide open for anyone (except the Raiders) lol
but isn’t everyone’s division wide open after 1 game???? lol
daaayuuuuum! you gonna take that KB?!? lol -Broncs55
Absolutely not. KB is a function of aggression and rage, the derivative of which can be traced back to my childhood.-KentuckyBronco
PS3 ID: KoRnHo|ed
good article tho KB and I did rec it!
daaayuuuuum! you gonna take that KB?!? lol -Broncs55
Absolutely not. KB is a function of aggression and rage, the derivative of which can be traced back to my childhood.-KentuckyBronco
PS3 ID: KoRnHo|ed
Only
if you think Buffalo has a legit chance in the AFC East
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Sep 16, 2010 2:37 PM MDT up reply actions
That's exactly what I was getting to.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by Troy Hufford on Sep 16, 2010 3:10 PM MDT up reply actions
Don't Forget
Jamaal Charles is good, but mostly when defenses start getting their chops wet about laying Cassel on his back. Chargers v Chiefs, Chargers special teams were atrocious! Quick down field but over pursued on every kick off and punt like they were running the 100m and not tackling a speedy returner headed the other direction. And the Charles 57 yarder came through a gaping hole wide enough to walk a tribe of Israelites through.. In space he will devastate. The chargers game plan for week one was faulty from the start and those “weather spoiled” football players looked like wet cats in the rain.. Embarrassing. Plus Rivers had 4 shots to put one in the hole on the goal line and he had a missed communication on one and boggled the others.. I think the Chiefs looked OK, but not worthy of too much cred here. And i will laugh up a lung if the Browns steal one from them. Meanwhile The Broncos get hellacious schedules- and here we are again fighting for our “playoff lives” with no real powder on our schedule. If we show up in 1st or 2nd we will still deserve more props then we will get!
by ProBallerTresDenver on Sep 16, 2010 9:44 AM MDT reply actions
Good Write Up
I think the Chargers, Chiefs, and Broncos will all be fighting till the end for that playoff spot, maybe even wildcard. It’s still early but what I like so far from each team.
Chargers: Rivers alone can win them games. They have talent at their WR position they just need to gel and get over their slow starts.
Broncos: Orton is vastly underrated. He can put up yards and he is very careful with the ball. It will take time for the front 7 to gel but once that happens, look out.
Raiders: They were actually pretty solid on stopping the run, besides that long run they gave up to CJ. Campbell looked just horrible out there. He needs to become their leader.
Chiefs: Special teams were on fire. Our defense seemed to have that nastiness we were wanting to see. QB and WR play needs to improve in a big way.
Let’s fight it out till the end boys!
Jamaal Charles...Enough said.
I hate that you have Jamal Charles.
Hate it.
This kid could be something really special.
Why does Madden suck at ranking the Broncos so much?
Yeah, he seems to be a lot like Chris Johnson
but Moreno isn’t a slouch. He’ll put up a lot of yards and TD’s for you guys if he stays healthy. He is the 2nd best RB in the AFC West behind Charles. I would say Jones is ahead of him but he’s no spring chicken. Bush and McFadden need to prove a lot and Mathews is a rookie.
Jamaal Charles...Enough said.
by Chiefsfan85 on Sep 16, 2010 10:20 AM MDT up reply actions
I think that everyone benefits when the division is battling it out from top to bottom
Now, if we could all shake that nagging sensation that it’s 3 mediocre teams fighting it out for table scraps and one cellar dweller playing occasional spoiler, then we’ll be that much better off. :)
by BroncosBassist on Sep 16, 2010 10:39 AM MDT up reply actions
Talent at the WR position in SD is based on Vincent Jackson playing. Which he isn’t.
Quitter's People United Member #396
"It was Joe Maysesque" -BTID
"I cussed a lot more in 2008 than any other season I can remember." -McGeorge
Floyd is actually pretty good
Very solid # 2
Nannee or however you spell it seems to be good just needs more showings.
Then you can count Gates as a WR if you wanted.
Jamaal Charles...Enough said.
by Chiefsfan85 on Sep 16, 2010 11:01 AM MDT up reply actions
Hey
a Chiefs fan whose neck I don’t want to wring. Well played sir!
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Sep 16, 2010 2:38 PM MDT up reply actions
Update from DP
via Twitter (Lindsay Jones)
@PostBroncos McDaniels said there’s a chance both Kuper and Harris will be able to play Sun vs. Seattle. Won’t know more till later in week, tho
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.
Love this
That is the rest of the West. Keeping track of the Raiders so you don’t have to.
I think this would have been Walter Cronkite’s signature line if he’d been a sports reporter.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted and then used against you.
hahaha, are you calling me the Walter Conkite of MHR?
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by Troy Hufford on Sep 16, 2010 3:13 PM MDT up reply actions
Gibert Arena's knee looked pretty much healed.
I wonder how long it’ll take before he brings a gun into the KC locker room. Oh, you mean Javier Arenas…
by adub on Sep 16, 2010 1:06 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
Disagree on One Point
The bottom line is that the Chargers have a long way to go if they want to get back in the playoffs in 2010.
Have to disagree on this point. The Chargers have proven over the last several years that even with a slow start, they are able to close the deal. Also, with a weak division they are way ahead of the rest of the AFC West and are still the favorites to win the division. All they need to get to the playoffs is beat the rest of the division. I’ve made the mistake of underestimating them many times so I’m not about to do it again :)
If They
lose at the Black Hole, you know it’s curtains for them
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Sep 16, 2010 2:40 PM MDT up reply actions
The Chargers are second in the division, just like the Broncos and Raiders. Don't see how anyone is a "favorite" after one week. The Chargers have been known for their slow starts, but that doesn't mean that they will step up this season.
This loss could be an indication that that they will just continue to be average…. or maybe they will turn it around and finish strong in the second half of the season… I don’t know, at this point. All we can go on is what we saw on film. As far as week 1 is concerned, they have a ways to go.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
by Troy Hufford on Sep 16, 2010 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions
The tRaiders look to be banged up pretty good...
If they lose any more they will be playing PS players, gotta love the motions Bro…

by 









































