Would Love Me Some Defense Tonight!
Some feel I was making something out of nothing when I wrote about my concerns over the lack of an identity on defense a few weeks ago. I think it's time to revisit that concern and maybe offer a better definition of what having no identity means to an NFL defense.
In my haste to express my concerns I may have muddled the true issue at hand that I was seeing. The term identity in the context I was using simply meant a lack of accountability that a dominant figure brings on the football field. I don't mean the kind of accountability players have to the coaching staff, because that is not the same as being held accountable by a true leader on the football field. If a guy blows an assignment and gets chewed out by the coaches, well that's to be expected, but then again, the coach isn't on the field trying to do the job is he? However, what happens if a guy blows an assignment on the field and he gets his ass chewed by another player? A player like Al Wilson was. Big Al is retired though, so tough luck there. Brian Dawkins can be that guy, but he is often in coverage and is not down in the trenches enough to really hold those guys accountable the way a dominant linebacker can.
I expressed doubts in Mario Haggan's ability to be that kind of leader in that post. He is a fine starting linebacker, but let's be completely honest here - he isn't special in the Al Wilson, Ray Lewis, or even the overrated Brian Urlacher mold. Those guys are as rare as are truly great defenses. The Denver Broncos have lost their linebacker tradition and its time for them to get it back. Elvis Dumervil was going to be that guy, but he is gone, likely for the season. The question now is, which linebacker is going to emerge as "The Guy"? Our season may hinge on the answer to that single question, a question that may not be answered until November or maybe never answered.
There are several undeniable facts about this year's defense that I will go over shortly, but before I do I want to assert that nothing is yet written in stone. This defense can write its own destiny in the coming months, however, if they do not get better in these certain areas they, and we, will be in for a long disappointing season.
Undeniable Fact #1
This unit lacks discipline.
What this means is that the Broncos defense has been caught over pursing on running plays and completely blowing containment at times. In fact, I mostly place the blame on our two young yet talented outside linebackers. Both Robert Ayers and Jarvis Moss are learning the finer nuances over the outside linebacker positions and I think are currently experiencing some of those growing pains. Though they are not the only ones to blame here, as I am sure everyone on the defense has blown an assignment this preseason, it's just that OLB are typically responsible for protecting those cutback lanes.
This undeniable fact is a major problem to have a week from the start of the regular season, but I am hopeful the coaching staff and the players will work hard to maintain discipline in the run defense. Otherwise, opposing teams will quickly figure out that all they have to do is run left five or six times in a row for three to four yards a pop, then run a misdirection play to the right to exploit the broken containment. Detroit did this somewhat, but I saw the Steelers really begin exploiting that last Sunday.
Undeniable Fact #2
This unit tackles poorly.
As the great Ted Barlett used to infer: What do my eyes tell me? My eyes tell me that Wink Martindale needs to make this unit run tackling drills 90% of each days practice and if a guy misses a tackle in practice, make him run ten laps. No, check that, make him run fifty! The NFL is a game of inches and when a player misses a tackle he gives the other team yards, not inches.
It is difficult to win the mother effing game when quarterbacks not named Tim Tebow are breaking tackles in the open field. In short, this team will need to be extremely disciplined and sure tacklers, because there will not be a Big Al-like force commanding the center of this defense in 2010.
Undeniable Fact #3
Though question marks abound there is much to be excited about.
I couldn't be completely negative, so let's see what exactly there is to be excited about concerning the Broncos defense.
The exciting aspect of this unit is its pure talent. There will be some big time, game savings plays on defense this year. That has been a dynamic that hasn't been a part of this unit since early 2006, which gives me hope that the D is truly getting its mojo back. I don't want people to think I hate this defense, for that couldn't be further from the truth. I see tons of potential and I am just expressing my concerns over the continued growing pains of a unit that is slowly coming together. My criticisms are as much a challenge to the young guys on the D and the coaches as it is an honest analysis of what we have seen so far this preseason.
Looking at the schedule, I see ten or eleven wins if the Broncos defense continues to improve. If it does not improve, or regresses, then Josh McDaniels may experience his first ever losing season as a player or coach. I believe in this team and I predict that we(the fans) will finally have a real good reason to watch football in January of 2011. Go Broncos!
27 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
spell check is not enough
especially for one of the “mhr staff”. try to re-read your stuff at least once before posting. thanks
by chancie on Sep 2, 2010 2:41 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
As a copy editor...
People that complain about such things without using capitol letters or proper punctuation are the bane of my existence.
Great post Tim, I’m particularly nervous about undeniable fact #2… Nothing gets me screaming at the TV quicker than failed arm tackles that result in 10+ more yards after contact.
None of us go out and play for stats. You just do whatever you can to help the team out. -- Eddie Royal
*capital letters
Before someone else gets the chance to point that one out lol.
None of us go out and play for stats. You just do whatever you can to help the team out. -- Eddie Royal
I thought you were doing it sarcastically, anyways.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
If someone owned an ICEE truck and wanted to kidnap me, I'd let them.
Epic Fail
How do you say that and don’t even capitalize your sentances???

"Bombs dropping down overhead. Underground. It's instilled to want to live." -EV
lulz.... ur dum. U spelt sentunces rong.
wut uh ideeut.
If Taylor Swift were to try and tackle me, I'd let her.
If someone owned an ICEE truck and wanted to kidnap me, I'd let them.
Double facepalm...poor Sadaraine!
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
I apologize for not living up to your standards.
I only found two typos, but if you care to point out more I will be happy to placate your insatiable desire for grammatical perfection.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
HEY TIM
ARE YOU EFFING PUMPED FOR THIS SEASON?! I AM EFFING PUMPED FOR THIS SEASON!
Edited for graphic violence and strong sexual content
Time to jell
I agreed with you before and I agree with you now that the defense needs an identity to play strong, but didn’t respond before because it was simply too soon to make any judgments. However, while the D needs an identity, I’m not so sure its needs an on-field taskmaster. I don’t remember the Orange Crush having that. Sure they were not a scary defense, like Baltimore can be, but they were effective. The identity doesn’t have to be a tough taskmaster, like Ray Lewis. But it does have to make the unit cohesive, like a Band of Brothers, people who know they can rely upon each other to get the job done. The overpursuing is an issue, maybe it will get better as they get experience. The lack of tackling is a huge issue, but that is for the coaches to cure, not an on-field taskmaster. The identity is something else. Iron Curtain is an identity (old Steelers). Purple People Eaters is an identity (old Vikings). Orange Crush is an identity (old Broncos). Maybe they need us to give them an identity. The fans came up with Orange Crush. In fact, the fans came up with all the identities mentioned above. Get to work MHR.
I voted "yes"
Not so much because I have great hopes for the defense per se. I think this season we will see McDaniels’ stress on complimentary football come to fruition.
I think we’ll see a big turn around in the special teams play, and the defense will play well enough to give our offense (which appears to be firing on more cylinders this year than in 2009) a legitimate chance to outscore the opponents.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
I voted no for one big fact
Our run defense. Last season, if you wanted to beat the Broncos, you ran the ball. Every game but the Indy game that we kept the running under 100 yards, we won. Every team the rushed for over 100 yards beat us. Not stopping the run was a big reason why we lost to Pittsburgh, Oakland and KC. I like bringing in our new, well old aged, defensive line, but at this point, I’m not seeing much difference in our ability to control the run. I know, it’s just preseason, but even our first team is getting run over, and if we can’t trust the preseason, we have to look at last season, and that’s not a pretty sight either.
I think our secondary is still one of the best in the league, just like last season, but if we can’t stop the run, teams aren’t going to throw it. If the defense can’t stop the run tonight, I could see some trouble this season for our defense. I still think 8-8 or 9-7 is very achievable, but I don’t think having a run defense that is allowing 172 yards a game is going to be able to win many games. We are the 32nd ranked rush defense in the league and the 31st ranked overall, for a team trying to improve it’s identity as a physical team, this preseason hasn’t helped that image.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Not all bad
The colts had the 32nd run defense and made it to multiple super bowls, they even one one hehe.
Well if we get a Peyton Manning, I could care less about our run defense
But like I said below, it’s a lot easier to improve our ability to stop the run then it is to find a Manning.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
I think you're mostly confusing cause and affect
Teams didn’t beat us last year because they rushed for over 100 yards, they rushed for for over 100 yards against us because they were winning.
The Saints and the Chargers allowed the same 4.5 yards per carry that the Broncos allowed last year. New England allowed 4.4 yards per carry, and Indianapolis allowed 4.3 yards per carry. What’s the difference? Those teams didn’t play from behind as often, and so their inability to stop the run didn’t matter.
So I just went back and looked at each games numbers
Baltimore: From start to finish, they ran far more often then threw. Ray Rice had a solid game, and Flacco actually threw more in the second half then he did in the first. 3.8 YPC
Pittsburgh: In the red zone, Roethlisberger had a field day, but in between the 20’s, Mendenhall had a field day. and up until their last drive with six minutes left, they threw the ball more often then they ran it. 6.0 YPC
Washington: After their first field goal in the fourth quarter, they switched to run mode, so this example does fit your mold. 4.5 YPC
San Diego: They played passing first till their second to last drive of the fourth quarter, but it should be noted that while they had a third of their total rushes on those two drives, those two drives only made up a fifth of all their rushing yards, meaning that their rushing was very effective prior to grind down time. 4.7 YPC
Indy: I wasn’t going to include this game because they didn’t rush for over 100 yards, but of their 92 yards 11 came in the 3rd quarter and 30 came in the 4th quarter. So less then half their rushing yards came in the second quarter. 3.3 YPC
Oakland: There was never throwaway time in this game, it came down to the wire. They were just able to run over us. 7.1 YPC
Philadelphia: This game was a bit off, they wouldn’t have run over 100 yards, or won the game for that matter, if it hadn’t been for McNabb’s 27 yard run in the fourth quarter. 3.8 YPC
Kansas City: After the 1st quarter failur of Cassel, this team became a run only one. They ran a lot, not just in the 4th quarter, but throughout the whole game, and it wasn’t because they were ahead, because they didn’t take a hold of the lead till the 4th quarter. No they ran because it worked, very well. 9.1 YPC
Now after that review, I only found one game, the Washington game, where the rush yards largely came while trying to run the clock out. But just to be sure that the number isn’t from shear attempts, I added the YPC to each game as well. So out of the eight losses we had, in three we had a better YPC then our average, in the others we were higher. In three we allowed 6 YPC or more.
As for comparing us to the Saints, Chargers, or NE, you can’t do that considering they have a powerful enough offense that they can compensate for a poor rush defense. Our offense isn’t good enough to do that. It’s easier to improve our run defense then it is to find a Drew Brees, Tom Brady or Philip Rivers.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Just re-watched the PIT game
The starting D gave up 3 points in 3.5 quarters. That’s pretty good. We are an opportunistic D.
I expect we will see more bend but don’t break until they start getting better chemistry with each other.
I feel so strongly about it, I drafted our D in my legacy fantasy league. :)
Heck yeah we win 10!
Officially on record with a 10-6 prediction for 2010! (8/21/10)
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
John Adams
Thanks Tim
My Koolaid cup is full, but I see issues too. Stopping teams from being able to run at will against us has to be a priority.
Tip: Orton memorabilia soon to increase in value, buy now!
Helpful and appropriate clarification
I get it now. And man, am I all for us going out and getting a big time, DOMINANT ILB next year. We may indeed be, as the old adage goes, “one player away.” I’m feeling good about the talent and depth. What you are pointing out, that undeniable quality of leadership and accountability, is exactly what the unit needs to galvanize into a championship level defense. A guy who inspires others to raise their standard of play.
What we may need, in short, is a defensive version of Tim Tebow.
In good times and bad times, I'm a Bronco fan. Sucka.
the quality on MHR is still good
and John is very very good at what he does, but since Ted Bartlett left to make his own web site no one has been able to match his writing prowess.
free special ed.
Ted Bartlett couldn't hold Jeremy Bolander's pencil sharper, much less make use of the lead as Jeremy does.
No offense. :)
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The guy formerly known as ZAPPA
Speaking of defense
Besides the obvious Dumervil, other BRoncos not expected to play tonight (as per the team) include Goodman, McBath, Reid, and Jamal Williams.
On offense, held out: Graham, Hochstein, Stokley (his days must be numbered… unless they put him on IR?), D. Thomas.
There's no need to fear, Underdog is here! / Broncos/Dodgers/Lakers fan in Niners/Raiders/Giants/Warriors country, and damned proud of it.
Wow
Clady, Knowshon, Bailey, Dawkins, Quinn, and Buckhalter are all back tonight.
BRONCO FOOTBALL BABY!!
Last Name: Ever, First Name: Greatest
Nobody Runs On The Denver Broncos
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
We lost games last year,
We simply got beat in all three phases of the game! Sure we had terrible run defense, but it also doesn’t help if we give up good field position and our offense can’t score points let alone keep a drive alive to keep our D rested on the sidelines
by BroncosFaN88 on Sep 2, 2010 6:02 PM MDT via mobile reply actions

by 





























