Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

The Aftermath: Colts 27 - Broncos 13 -- I Find The Lack Of Execution Disturbing

(Photo by Doug Pensinger/Getty Images)

The title of this week's Aftermath should be read aloud in your best Darth Vader voice.  It seems fitting since it seems there are tremors in The Force that are keeping the Broncos from getting out of their own way.  Yesterday's loss to the Indianapolis Colts was frustrating.  It will cause your hair to gray, or fall out entirely, and leaves a bad taste in your mouth.  The interesting challenge is to try and find a way for the Broncos to fix The Force, and begin executing at a CONSISTENT LEVEL that will help them win ballgames.  Their margin for error is simply too small for the team to overcome the amount of mistakes the team is making - in all three phases.  Complimentary Football.  Right now, the Broncos aren't doing it and they are paying the price.

Last week I talked about O+P*E=Success.  There were plenty of examples against the Seahawks that illustrated that principle.  This Sunday, the Broncos proved my theory even more - by doing the opposite.

Drive For Show, Putt For Dough - The numbers look awfully impressive, don't they?  519 yards of total offense.  472 yards passing.  An offensive-fan's dream.  Unfortunately it means, well, nothing, and the numbers are so lopsided that the Broncos gave themselves little chance of being successful, especially in the Red Zone.  Remember last week?  The Broncos ran the ball 38 times in their win against Seattle.  Yesterday, they ran the ball just 18 times.  This was a game that was close for a large majority of the 2nd Half.  The Broncos didn't have to abandon the run.  Right now the Broncos offense reminds me of a golfer that can hit the ball right down the fairway, 275 yards,only to need 6 shots to get up and down.  The Broncos can do just about anything they want from 20-20 but can't get the ball into the endzone using their short game.

Star-divide

We all know what's wrong.  The question is, how to fix it.  Easier said than done.  A good running game is born from a stability along the offensive line.  When the Broncos were a dominant running team, they had an offensive line that, for the most part, played together every week for years.  Sure, pieces changed, but Tom Nalen was the mainstay.  He made all the calls, he set all the blocking schemes.  Guys like Matt Lepsis and Ben Hamilton learned from GREAT players like Gary Zimmerman and Mark Schlereth.  Where is that now?  You look at this unit - even when they are all healthy - and it is a young group:

LT - Ryan Clady - 3rd Season
LG - Stanley Daniels - 2nd Season
C   - J.D. Walton - Rookie
RG - Chris Kuper - 5th Season
RT - Ryan Harris - 4th Season

Where is all the veteran leadership?  Oh, and these guys have started ONE GAME together.  I know Josh McDaniels got criticized for starting Ryan Harris against the Vikings, but he wanted to get a few plays in with his starting O-Line in-tact.  It's hard to blame him, and you can't coach scared.  It's unlucky and unfortunate that Harris got hurt, but this group needs to play together.  That has yet to happen this season, but the hope is it could, perhaps starting this Sunday against the Titans.

The Crucial Possession - For all the mistakes, the Broncos were in a great position to take control of the game - or at least take the lead. 

It happened in the 3rd Quarter.  4 Plays that could just as easily cost the Broncos the game as any of the 'obvious choices.  The Broncos had just scored a touchdown on a 48-yard rope from Kyle Orton to Brandon Lloyd.  The score was 13-10 Colts, and the Broncos seemed to have the momentum.  The defense then did it's part, holding the Colts to a 3-and-out.  The Broncos would get the ball back in decent field position. 

PLAY #1 - The Penalty on The Punt - Eddie Royal returns the Colts punt 38-yards, giving the Broncos a 1st and 10 at their own 48-yard line.  Hold on, there's a flag, and a holding penalty on Matthew Willis brings the ball back to the Broncos 28, costing Denver 20-yards in field position.  That's two first downs.  Instead of being on the cusp of field goal range, the Broncos are pushed back.

PLAY #2 - 1-10-DEN 28 (9:59) 8-K.Orton pass incomplete short left to 84-B.Lloyd.
PLAY #3 -
2-10-DEN 28 (9:53) (Shotgun) 8-K.Orton pass incomplete short left to 82-D.Gronkowski
PLAY #4 -
3-10-DEN 28 (9:47) (Shotgun) 8-K.Orton pass incomplete short right to 84-B.Lloyd

The Broncos go 3-and-out, holding on to the ball for exactly 12 seconds.  TWELVE SECONDS.  If there was ever a situation that I'd like to see the Broncos go back to the running game, just to try and establish something, this was the time.  Instead, a penalty and three in-completions gave the ball RIGHT BACK to Peyton Manning.  The Result?  10-plays, 79 yards, 4:40, Touchdown.  The Broncos trail 20-10.

The Wisdom Of Crowds - The 4th Down decisions the Broncos have made are getting a ton of attention, as they should.  I guess you can't say Josh McDaniels isn't consistent.  Against Jacksonville and again against the Colts, the Broncos had 4th and 3 situations, inside the 15-yard line, down 7 points, in the 4th Quarter, and decided to go for it.  Both times, the Broncos went to Brandon Lloyd.   I agreed 100% with the call in Jacksonville.  The Broncos special teams had not played well, and the Broncos would need a touchdown anyway if they kick a field goal to cut the lead to 4.  In that situation, the Broncos missed by about 3 inches as Lloyd couldn't get his 2nd foot down.

Some might say the situation was a bit different yesterday, but was it?  The Broncos would still have needed a touchdown had they kicked a FG, and it is still Peyton Manning they were playing against.  In other words, if you don't want to give the ball to David Garrard in good field position, why would you decide to give it to Manning.  I guess it is an easy decision to criticize.  I won't debate you on that.  I agree with any team that tries to be aggressive, especially when you are the underdog.   The key, however, is getting the players to execute.  On the 4th Down call yesterday, the Colts blitzed from Kyle Orton's right.  Orton made the right call to throw the 'HOT' Route into the blitz.  Brandon Lloyd had 1-on-1 coverage to that side, but didn't run the hot route.  That's a lack of execution, a mental mistake.   

How about the 4th and Goal situation.  Again, I have no problem with going for it. Four shots from inside the 2 yard line has to be a touchdown, especially when playing the Colts.  I would have done some things a bit differently, however.

1.  Where was Correll Buckhalter The Broncos scored their first goal-line' touchdown last week with C-Buck running right behind J.D. Walton.  C-Buck is the one back the Broncos have right now that will actually attack the interior of the line.  Being a veteran, he know that sometimes there are holes when you can't see holes, and he knows that sometimes you just have to run it up inside trusting that the big uglies will get it done.  Even Knowshon, when he dove over the top last week, finally seemed to be getting how to run in tight. 

Yesterday, the Broncos chose to give the ball to Laurence Maroney at the goal line.  The only problem is Maroney isn't a very good runner inside the tackles.  The reason a team has two-backs is they provide different strengths to an offense.  At Minnesota, Maroney split time with Marion Barber.  It was Barber that got the tough, physical yards, while Maroney was more finesse.  Maroney's first instinct is to bounce a play outside.  Instead of taking the shortest path - yet most contact - Maroney tries to go around the pile.  Do that against the Colts and you're done. 

2.  Why not spread the defense out a bit?  Now, I'm not saying to go shotgun, 4-wides from the 2 yard line.  Not at all.  How many times, though, did we see John Elway in the shotgun hand the ball off to Terrell Davis on a draw play, or fake the hand-off and run the bootleg? You know, some mis-direction.  By going with a jumbo-package, the Broncos are essentially trying to score in a 9-on-11 situation.  The QB isn't going to block, and the running back has the ball.  If the Broncos are going to try and play POWER FOOTBALL, they need a traditional FB.  That's not a jab at Spencer Larsen - he was out of the game anyway - but a call to get a guy in that specializes in blowing up linebackers.  With an inexperienced offensive line, why not at least try, instead of three shots running right at the teeth of the defense, using a running back that kicks everything outside.

3.  If you are going to go for it on 4th Down - and the Broncos had already made that decision when they threw the fade route on 3rd Down, I would much rather try the pass on 2nd Down.  The play? Not a fade route - something that is not one of Kyle Orton's strong suits.  I would have tried a play similar to what the Broncos ran against the Chargers from the SAME SPOT during the 'Hochuli' game.  Eddie Royal ran the same play and scored twice -first the touchdown, then the two-point conversion.   A little double move, then sit down right at the goal-line.  It could be Royal, Lloyd, Graham, Thomas - take your pick.

Play-calling, Formations, Execution, Personnel - all played a hand in the Broncos failures on 4th Down situations.

If The Defense Plays Like This, We'll Win 10-Games - Yea, I said it.  If we get this type of defensive effort we'll win 10 games this season.  The Broncos won't face a quarterback as good as Peyton Manning the rest of the season.  Truth be told, the Broncos defense made things tough on Manning for a large chunk of the football game.  There are no moral victories, and Peyton still  found a way to adjust and overcome, but the seeds were there. 

The goal of the defense was two-fold - stop the Colts running game and stop the Colts' big weapons.  They were successful on both accounts.  The Colts averaged less than two-yards a carry yesterday, against a Broncos defense that had struggled against the run coming in.  Secondly, Dallas Clark and Reggie Wayne were non-factors for much of the game.  They forced the Colts to go another direction.  Eventually, the Colts did -Austin Collie had a huge day - and Manning did what he does best - attack the youth and inexperience of a defense.  If Andre Goodman was healthy, maybe it would have been different, but overall I liked the way the Broncos played defense yesterday.

How about the tackling?  This is the best I've seen a Broncos team tackle in years.  While there has been criticism of the Broncos tough Training Camp regimen, you can't perfect a skill without practicing it, and the Broncos have worked extensively on tackling and it has shown.  D.J. Williams is playing at a high-level and opposing offenses are not getting much in the way of YAC.

If the Broncos can play defense like that against the Titans, Ravens and Jets they'll win 2-of-3.

On to the Questions!  You can send your Questions in for The Aftermath to MILEHIGHREPORT@GMAIL.COM

Not sure how to phrase this - is McDaniels trying to teach our linemen too many things to begin their careers? Simms made a comment about how rookie linemen usually come into the league only being good at run blocking. Obviously, our team has 3 first time starters and we can't run worth a bleep. He is trying to have them pass block for his pretty complicated passing offense, run block in a power scheme, run block in a zone blocking scheme... when does he just say "ok let's focus on running". Be decent at one type instead of poor at two types. - Todd

Good Question.  Simms' statement is an accurate one - in most cases.  I actually think, with this group, the OPPOSITE is true.  I wrote after the Broncos ran the ball just 15 times against the Cincinnati Bengals during the pre-season that the Broncos were actually running an offense that helped their young offensive linemen - especially J.D Walton and Zane Beadles:

It is true the Broncos really didn't try to run the ball, but that too was to get Orton and his young O-Line into a groove.  Ryan Harris is a better pass blocker than run blocker.  Same with Russ Hochstein.  What about the rookies?  That's easy - Zane Beadles, who played at Utah, played on an offense that was a better passing group than running group.  In 2009, Utah ranked 40th in the country in Passing Offense.  They were 46th in Rush Offense.

The disparity is even bigger for J.D. Walton, a rookie trying to make the transition to be a starting center in the NFL.  At Baylor, Walton anchored a line that was much better at throwing the ball(46th in the Country) than running the ball(110th).  Add in the fact that the Broncos are decimated at running back, and you see why the Broncos were throwing the ball all over Paul Brown Stadium.

Ryan Harris played under Charlie Weis at Notre Dame when Brady Quinn was there.  They threw the ball all over the field.  Boise State was a pass-happy team when Clady was there as well.  This is definitely no excuse for the putrid YPC for the Broncos running game, but it does go against Simms' generalization.

As for your second point - should the Broncos focus on one-style of running - it is well taken.  I think at the NFL-level, however, guys have to be flexible.  The assertion that a team is going to be a certain style of  running team or passing team is old-fashioned.  Teams do it all, depending on the matchup.  The key to any O-Line, however, is trust, stability, and 5-guys working as one.  That comes with time and the Broncos are trying to get there.

Where are we going to get a pass rush from? We are not blitzing and we certainly are not getting much pressure from our LB corp. - Todd

I think that is going to vary week-to-week.  Each opponent is different, especially when it comes to the blitz.  If you blitz Peyton Manning, for instance, he will kill you.  The Broncos did a decent job in the first half getting people in Manning face.  The Colts adjusted in the 2nd half, going with quicker routes, three-step drops, which allowed Manning to attack downfield later in the game.

This week, the Broncos face the Titans.  That means Vince Young.  While the reasons are different, you probably don't want to blitz Young either.  With the threat he poses as a runner, the Broncos would be wise to lay back and force Young to make good decisions and good throws to mediocre talent.  The Broncos also need to make sure Chris Johnson is bottled up.

What will the decision be when Harris returns?  Does Beadles go back to the bench or does he replace Daniels in the LG spot?  - Matt D.

Unless Josh McDaniels changes his mind, and after a strong showing by Beadles yesterday he might, Beadles will go to the bench and Daniels will stay at LG.  Daniels hasn't played poorly either, and the Broncos have something going, especially in the passing game.

We once again saw the thermometer on CBS show a temperature well above 100 F, and Colts players getting shielded from the sun on the sideline.  Would it not make more sense to wear our white away jerseys in such situations, or does it really not have any effect on players? - Bert Jan, Netherlands

Strictly my opinion, but I think that is more mental than anything else.  Is it hot?  Yes.  These guys are world-class athletes, however, and the color of the jersey should have little effect.  The shade also creeps across the Broncos bench around halftime, so many of the guys get plenty of shade as the game wears on.

Does it seem like Orton has trouble under pressure? - Yi Zhang

It is something that Orton needs to work on, no doubt.  At 27, however, he's also NOT a finished product.  You can see the difference from 2009 to 2010 and I feel his feel for the pocket is only going to get better as his understanding of the offense improves.  As we've talked about, you don't have to run, or be Michael Vick, but you have to be able to step up away from the pressure and deliver the football.  Sure, the offensive line played well yesterday, but Orton is also a big reason why he was sacked/hit just one time in the 57 times he dropped back.

Thanks again for the great questions... We'll see you next week on The Aftermath!

Comment 45 comments  |  9 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

the REFS

give INDY the game that maroney play was a TD because they call a TD on the field and replays shows he touched the plain and he knee was down at the same time and we got pass int 4 times yestday 4 2 was blalent it shoulid have been 30-27 INDY in ot but the refs in my opinton give indy the game

okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider

by j-man on Sep 27, 2010 2:34 PM MDT reply actions  

His knee was on the defenders palm...still live! This officiating crew missed the illegal shift of Royal and Lloyd in the RedZone.

But they wouldn’t make the call on Gaffney with Lacey’s hands ll over him…Bad calls change the complexity of the game time and time again…

by bfree2bronc on Sep 27, 2010 5:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree j-man

The refs blew too many calls. Kind of like NBA officials.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.

by KaptainKirk on Sep 27, 2010 6:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thanks Guru...

I think our O line is getting a crash course in ALL subjects; ZB, POWER and PASS PROTECT. It is true what you say about our line coming from pass happy systems, but I think McD wants these guys grilled in pass protect first as he knows it takes a while for run game to gel.
I am not as worried about the run game as most. i think McD uses it to keep opposition guessing on its heals. We used ZB yesterday to keep Mathis and Freeney moving and to give KO more time.
it will come….and the THREAT of the run game is what we really need moving forward.
Nice article.

You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!

"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"

Harv Neptune.

by boydy2669 on Sep 27, 2010 2:37 PM MDT reply actions  

I just can't get aboard the DJ train

He’s great at tackling from behind, in a chase position. He’s not great a tackling head on, something I think we need in an ILB. His best play was not letting Addai get the first down after catching the pass, that’s where his talent lies. He is better suited to the WLB in a 4-3.

Owning the Patriots since September 9, 1960

by Darin H on Sep 27, 2010 2:51 PM MDT reply actions   2 recs

I thought he played great yesterday...I have no complaints about ANY on our defense yesterday...play like that we beat MOST teams.

You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!

"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"

Harv Neptune.

by boydy2669 on Sep 27, 2010 3:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

We beat about 2/3 of the teams in the league.

But not the elite ones. I like what I saw for the most part out of the defense, and they’re certainly not the reason we lost the game. But let’s see them play that way consistently, and even a notch or two higher. If they can, and we can start establishing some sort of a running attack and eliminate foolish special teams play then we will really have a team to be reckoned with.

Madden be trippin' on my speed.

by TheMastermind on Sep 27, 2010 3:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

That's part of the problem too, though.

This maddening trend the last few years of getting “up” for the good teams, playing “down” to the inferior teams. Oakland, KC, etc.

- Nick

"Know the enemy, know yourself, and victory is never in doubt, not in a hundred battles."
- Sun Tzu

"if you look close, there’s a hoodie lurking in the background of picture 4. similar to the classic sasquatch shot and equally stunning, as the denver temperature today is relatively fair."
-oxmouth

by ncm42 on Sep 27, 2010 6:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

100% agreed...and not being able to throttle the throat of victory when we can!

You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!

"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"

Harv Neptune.

by boydy2669 on Sep 27, 2010 6:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

That's why the Seattle game had me so excited

We FINALLY seemed to put our boot on the opponents’ throat, if only so slightly.

- Nick

"Know the enemy, know yourself, and victory is never in doubt, not in a hundred battles."
- Sun Tzu

"if you look close, there’s a hoodie lurking in the background of picture 4. similar to the classic sasquatch shot and equally stunning, as the denver temperature today is relatively fair."
-oxmouth

by ncm42 on Sep 27, 2010 6:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

agreed

I’d like to see us blitz more but not against Manning of course… Very happy with everything but our execution yesterday. We’re young as hell, the season’s young as hell. Our execution will improve for sure… how much is the question at this point.

http://www.centsports.com/ref/698077/Joe_Vick
If you think you know sports, try betting here for free.
I'm up to 3 dollars!

by Whidbey Bronco on Sep 27, 2010 6:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree completely.

DJ never was and never will be a run stuffer. But overall the run D was as good yesterday as it has ever been.

by John in Castle Rock on Sep 27, 2010 3:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

Until yesterday, I agreed

DJ showed me a little something against Indy. He made some good tackles against running backs, and I saw him do a little bit in coverage, too. Let’s see if he can keep it up, though.

by BroncosBassist on Sep 27, 2010 6:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

I like this column.

Good stuff, thanks Guru.

Madden be trippin' on my speed.

by TheMastermind on Sep 27, 2010 3:06 PM MDT reply actions  

Appreciate it!

-TSG

SBNation's Denver Broncos Blogger
MileHighReport

Questions, Comments...E-Mail Me!
milehighreport@gmail.com
or
Call Me! (303)731-5605

Follow MHR on Twitter!
Follow MHR on Facebook!

XBox Gamertag - MileHighReport
Playstation Gamertag - TheSportsGuru

by John Bena on Sep 27, 2010 3:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

Great Post

John I think your analysis is spot on. I am very excited about this team and this coach. I will also admit that while I liked his decisions; I didn’t like the play selection. Additionally, as good a game as Lloyd had he dis miss that hot read. Of all the units that need time together it is our OL some very good young talent, but far from polished. My feeling is that we are still a year away from being a legit contender or we need everyone to heal very quickly; however, unlike last years team I think this team will get better as the season goes on. you are also right on about the 3 and out after we scored another huge turn was when we had them 3rd and 15 and got beat deep.

oldcoachB

by oldcoachB on Sep 27, 2010 5:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree

Good analysis. John. I agreed with every one of your comments.

We do need a power back.

I am also a Baltimore Raven’s fan when we aren’t playing them, and it was painful to watch Peyton Hillis be a one-man-band with the football. Some of it was blocking, but much of it was a motivated Hillis carrying the pile with him.

Next week’s game is critical, we aren’t playing Peyton Manning.

by Baltimore Bronco on Sep 27, 2010 3:12 PM MDT reply actions  

O-line run blocking..

..has been less than stellar as everyone on every thread I have been reading today points out, and I am not just talking about in the red zone. So why don’t we move on to what has been working? Why not let Kyle keep tossing the rock? It seems to me a though McDaniels has got it in his head that we have to run the ball inside the 10 and he’s going to keep trying until it works. Why? I mean, I realize the need for an improved running game in all facets, but with the game on the line do what your team does best. Pass the Ball! Keep working on the running game in practice.

Most everyone is disappointed with this loss to some extent but I think it’s boarding on ridiculous for some people. The sky-is-falling crew seems to be out in full force. I wanted the Broncos to win this game just as much as anyone, but in my heart I knew they wouldn’t. I think the same it true for 90% of the people who frequent this site. I believe the Broncos are on the cusp, but not quite there yet. So now that the loss has happened (just like everyone would have predicted before hand) the over the top bashing has started. Why? It is still early in the season and I believe the Broncos are on the right track. Phil Simms said as much numerous times yesterday. I for one was encouraged with what I saw. Yes there are certainly things to work on and improve, but by no means was this a devastating loss. I am still very excited for the rest of the season and like our chances in the AFC West.

I...drink...your...milkshake. I drink it up!

by ClaysDad on Sep 27, 2010 3:15 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Also Encouraged

I saw a pass rush and saw some pretty decent pass coverage.

Our passing game was fun to watch.

Good game.

by Baltimore Bronco on Sep 27, 2010 3:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

This team CAN beat anybody they play.

The questions is one of will. Where is the “will to win”. Can we dig up Vince Lombardi and get him in here to motivate this team?

by John in Castle Rock on Sep 27, 2010 3:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

The tough thing is...

…we can also LOSE to anyone we play…until we learn how to consistently score when we have opportunities in the red zone, this team will be vulnerable to lose on any given Sunday….I opposed the forsaking of the field goals since we could have used the points…but the other part of that ciriticism is that if we cannot score from the 1 yard line on 1st, 2nd or 3rd down, what in the world makes us think we will do so on 4th??? As I recall, this was a problem with the team LAST year, and it still seems to be unresolved…maybe even worse…it does not help to have the analysts on the broadcast saying that McD gave red zone success special/extra attention all week long…guess what? it does not appear to have been time well spent.
It is obvious that there is something good afoot here….the team has a number of offensive weapons, particularly the receiving corps, who seem to have failed to read the memo regarding how bad things would be without BMarshall…and Orton seems to be evolving into the QB we hoped he would be, and the defense has held up well enough (save for the dreaded 3rd and long conversions!)….but put this team inside the 20 yd line and we become ineffective and then gamble over and over with limited success…passing on points that MIGHT (I stress “might”) alter the outcome of the game…until this team demonstrates the ability to consistently ram the ball across the goal line, I suggest we not pass up points on the irrational hope that “this time” it will all work out…

What if you don't know Jack....but Jack knows you?

by Hugo Norton on Sep 27, 2010 4:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

Guru: What the answer to getting this team to run better?

What should the coaching staff be doing to get this team to run block and power run better? Should someone take a baseball bat to the back of the heads of Moreno and Maroney the next time they fail to follow their blockers? It seems there is no improvement in this area week after week.

by John in Castle Rock on Sep 27, 2010 3:25 PM MDT reply actions  

The Titans

are beatable. In my Monday morning film session, I watched Titans-Giants and Broncos-Colts. Tennessee gave up 400+ yards to the Giants. We have a better offense than the G-Men. It’s all about converting in the red zone people.

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Sep 27, 2010 3:34 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks John. I like where we're going.

Its just frustrating getting there. The light at the end of the tunnel just got a little brighter.

by broncosaurusuper on Sep 27, 2010 3:54 PM MDT reply actions  

Great post, John!

Enjoyed your take… particularly since it is so similar to mine ;>).

"A man's life is dyed the color of his imagination."

Marcus Aurelius

by hairybear on Sep 27, 2010 4:04 PM MDT reply actions  

Hi everyone im new here well i been reading the post since the offseason but this is my first time posting anything
Overall the team played great when have u seen a team post those huge numbers against Indys D i know its not a top 10 defense but the broncos played to their strenghts and still managed to stay in the game the team was in obious passing situations all of the second half and the Indy pressure was not seen Freeney was he even playing???? the o line played great the running lanes were there but maroney was to busy trying out for dancing with the stars back there if Moreno would have been there it would have been a different story.
The D played their ass off remember it was Payton Manning the best qb of this decade if not of all time well at least that i have seen play ( even tough i hate the guy) we are 3 defensive players away from being able to scare oposing qbs.
But the future is bright all you Mcdaniels haters just quit being a Broncos fan and go somewhere else he has done to much for the garbage of organization than Mike Shanan left him more than 10 years of horrible drafts be happy the team can even contend

by guatemalan bronco on Sep 27, 2010 4:05 PM MDT reply actions  

Great read, John

I find it hard to believe, but I in my opinion our defense performed better than our offense yesterday. That’s a good sign, now I just wish they could both play well the same week.

Also as a desert dweller don’t discount the advantages of wearing white. I am not a thermal engineer but you can touch a white car when it is 115, but a black car will give you 2nd degree burns. You don’t wear black in the summer unless you’re trying to make a goth statement.

Tip: Orton memorabilia soon to increase in value, buy now!

by azdenfan on Sep 27, 2010 4:06 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks

Great analysis, but the problem seems to be more than execution. There is a lack of imagination, motion, or presenting matchups in the short yardage situations. What to do? Why not include Tebow in these situations? I know he was not active for yesterday’s game, and if that’s the case throughout the season, it might be a moot point. I find it hard to believe having the threat of Tebow at the goal line would not have made a difference…like seven points, and a difference in approach in the 4th quarter.
By the way, while many commenters focus on the 4th down failures, John is right on the key posession. It was the 3 and out in the 3rd quarter

by markmcvicar on Sep 27, 2010 4:09 PM MDT reply actions  

Oh please no ....

I can so clearly see TT in that situation – we would in fact get the seven points. I am really looking forward to TTs development – his slamming into an NFL line leaves him on the PUP list, not good for his development.

by Flunkie on Sep 27, 2010 5:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

Awesome write up

I agree with everything you said. There were positives to take away from this game. But for me, those positives makes the loss harder to take.

We are so close to being an undeniable playoff contender. But we lack one major factor, and it was a big one in your post. Consistency. We have enough talent, we have smart enough coaches, and we certainly have the heart. But we need to execute on what we do well consistently, game in and game out.

We gave Indy a run for their money. But we could and should have won that game. I want Superbowl every year for this team, to be only the best. Even if Indy is elite, we lost a game we had every chance to win. The team should learn from the mistakes made, but never ever be complacent with them.

There are no moral victories in true competition, either a Win or a Loss. And the Broncos have a team that could put up a W against any team, if they play at a consistent level.

by droom on Sep 27, 2010 4:16 PM MDT reply actions  

Wanted to send this in

But didn’t get the chance. Last season, we had 17 interceptions and 20 forced fumbles. About a third of those interceptions came from Goodman with the FF being largely caused by the secondary and linebackers. This season to me, our biggest problem might not be running the ball, teams can still win 8 games without that, but you can’t, or it’s almost impossible to, win without turnovers.

This season so far we have 3 interceptions, all against Hasselbeck, meaning that the sub-par Garrard didn’t get picked off at all. We also have 0 FF. These stats should be shocking to you. The interceptions are fair, one against Garrard now has become standard, so that makes us look even worse. Goodman being out might be what’s hurting us most there, as for FF, not sure whats going on. Outside of MJD, we haven’t faced and elite back, and besides the Colts wideouts, we haven’t really seen a strong wide receiving corp.

Why aren’t we creating turnovers?

I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by Topher Doll on Sep 27, 2010 5:13 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks Guru...

Your analyses are part of the reason I spend so much time on MHR, both before and after the games.

by IdahoFalls4Broncos on Sep 27, 2010 5:19 PM MDT reply actions  

Comment from a Colts fan...

…mostly about the site, a little about the team.

I like to read the opposing teams boards prior to our game with them and just wanted to say that I really enjoyed yours. Very good analysis. You guys always had classy teams and I can attest from being at Colts games when we played you, you also have classy fans.

I’m still not sure what to make of your head coach and your rookie QB, but believe me, we envy your O-line.

One more thing – good luck against the Titans. All of us Colts fans will be rooting for you.

by smonroe on Sep 27, 2010 5:38 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks smonroe

With classy guys like Manning leading your team it is hard not to like the Colts …
With talented guys like Manning leading your team is hard not to hate the Colts …

by Flunkie on Sep 27, 2010 5:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

RB is NOT our problem with the run!

This is a young line! It takes YEARS for a line to become great. It may take the whole season for ours to become average. I will say though, even if we draft nobody next year and our line gels… We’re going to be GOOD.

http://www.centsports.com/ref/698077/Joe_Vick
If you think you know sports, try betting here for free.
I'm up to 3 dollars!

by Whidbey Bronco on Sep 27, 2010 6:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

Great write up, John

A couple of thoughts from the cheap seats:

1)Why didn’t we run more? My thought is production — vs Seattle, on Denver’s 1st 10 runs, the Broncos averaged 3.4 yards per carry and had a touchdown. vs Indianapolis’ supposedly terrible run defense, on Denver’s 1st 10 runs, the Broncos averaged 2.6 yards per carry (or almost a yard less than vs Seattle) and didn’t produce a first down nor a touchdown.

2)Was it just my imagination or did the play action pass that Orton was running to perfection between the 20s disappear in the Red Zone? Indianapolis is known for a defense that is predicated on the first guy slowing down the ball carrier then the rest of the guys swarming the runner. It seemed like once we got in close, we abandoned any attempt at misdirection.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Sep 27, 2010 6:34 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

YES...why not play action or bootleg in the 20's...Conservative play calling in 20's doomed us again Brian!

You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!

"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"

Harv Neptune.

by boydy2669 on Sep 27, 2010 6:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

I sure miss the bootlegs.

Plummer made those plays happen time after time. And they ALWAYS worked.

-Harvey J. Neptune

"Either way, this game will be put in perspective and ultimately, win or lose, will not mean nearly as much as all of us waking up in the morning, taking a deep breath, appreciating what we have and living our lives for as long as we are given the gift of life." - KentuckyBronco

by HarvJNep2n on Sep 27, 2010 11:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

Regarding question 1

I think the contrast in running production between the Seattle and Indy games was simply Moreno vs. Mauroney. The latter simply seems to not have a second gear; there was no burst there. To his credit, he did have a nice run after catch in the fourth quarter. Perhaps he’s hurt or it was simply rust, but watching the game I thought it was pretty obvious as to why the Pats let him go.
Go Broncs!

It's "just" football

by Donkhead on Sep 28, 2010 3:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

First game of year....he is only young and will be fine....not the ideal way to come in....

Hey Laurence, not going to believe it, but Knowshon is down again….so what say instead of easing back in you be the starting back? Cool….knew that would work for you.

You, my friend, are proof you dont need to have big floppy feet and a red nose to be a clown!

"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"

Harv Neptune.

by boydy2669 on Sep 28, 2010 5:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that's why I'm hoping it was just rust

I really do hope that he proves me wrong about the burst because we surely do need all of that we can muster. And point well taken on the need for at least occasional mis-direction in the red zone.
Go Broncs!

It's "just" football

by Donkhead on Sep 29, 2010 10:03 AM MDT up reply actions  

Done and done.

-Harvey J. Neptune

"Either way, this game will be put in perspective and ultimately, win or lose, will not mean nearly as much as all of us waking up in the morning, taking a deep breath, appreciating what we have and living our lives for as long as we are given the gift of life." - KentuckyBronco

by HarvJNep2n on Sep 28, 2010 6:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

P1_plummer_small
For those Bronco Fans Who have served....
Imgres_small
Are You Nuts? No Plan B?
Oc_small
I NEED YOUR HELP MHR: The Down Under Bowl

Recent FanPosts

Angels_small
Moreno Out the Door this Offseason
Small
What Do You Expect From Our Draftees ?
Small
An in depth look at "PLAN A"
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick Really Worth? Pt. 2.
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
Glad for Gronkowski
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick REALLY Worth?
Index_small
Nate Irving!
Fhgfhgfhg_small
Rod Smith is a Hall of Famer....Right?
205783_109706759113985_100002239833864_101133_7230028_n_small
My Final 53

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Broncos-von-miller_small Scotty Payne

Ph_small BroncoPH

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall