So I was having an argument with a friend today over what "contributing" to a blog entails. Some may wonder, how does this argument even come up...Ill spare everyone the details of which I am sure nobody is interested in haha.
Long story short, I believe that you "contribute" through functions like fanshots and fanposts. I do believe there is a very solid distinction between contributing and managing, editing, etc. and I have never claimed to do anything else other than contribute. By posting relevant information for example about the broncos through the fanshots and fanposts here on MHR I believe you are "contributing" to the overall blog and are thus a "contributor". My friend sees it as contributors run the blog and the rest of us just read and cannot claim that you contribute to the blog.
Is it a pointless argument? Absolutely. But I thought I would ask what you guys thought, if nobody answers I wouldn't think blame anyone.