Who Wants Orton?

Denver seems to want a 2nd round pick in exchange for Orton. Is Orton worth a 2nd round pick -- or better -- and which teams will pay that price?

IMO, there are seven teams that really need some QB solution beyond a backup/reserve type.

Arizona - Skelton was drafted in mid/late rounds last year. Seemed to play OK in the last few games for them. But I would imagine that they want to draft a QB to keep the competition going to find their long-term solution. And they are probably now confident in their QB scouting to be able to draft one this year. I don't see why they would be interested in Orton.

Carolina - Obviously no interest in Orton. Total poison -- Orton + Clausen + Luck??? And no WR's?

Jacksonville -- Need to replace Garrard soon. No interest in Orton. Tebow OTOH - they will pay a lot. but I won't go there.

Minnesota - Need a long-term solution at QB (ie draft) and, possibly, a short-term solution to hand the ball off to AP. There is a possible fit here. But I can't see them pulling the trigger on a trade until they can see what they are likely to get in the draft this year. If a trade with them happens, it will likely happen on draft day.

San Francisco - Depends on the new coach. They are in position to draft any QB that doesn't rhyme with Tuck. But we also have something else that SF will likely desperately want -- our #2 slot. They probably feel they are literally only one or two positions away from going very far into the playoffs and possibly to the Super Bowl. A veteran game-manager type QB and a CB (ie Peterson or Amakamura) is all they need. So it is possible that a deal -- Orton and our #2 slot for their #7 slot and their 1st round pick next year - and some late-round draft slots this year. Personally, I like the idea of having 2 first round picks in 2012 - and we use 2011 to fill holes (esp high-upside late-rounders who need development/coaching) and find out what current talent is actually part of a long-term solution. Won't be a particularly fun year for us next year -- but I don't think it will be anyway even if we keep a #2 pick. This sort of trade really does maximize the opportunity for a new coach. He will need a lot of picks and a lot of choices to build the foundation up again --- not merely an all-or-nothing at #2.

Seattle - Like SF, they probably think they are only a couple of pieces away from going far. They're probably wrong. Plus, they really need a long-term solution so no interest in Orton unless a deal is struck in the next day to help them with the playoffs this year. Maybe they'll offer a second round for that but I doubt it.

Tennessee - Has just announced that Vince Young will not be back. That raises a possible trade very much like the SF trade possibility. They are a team that just needs a couple of pieces to go far -- DT43 and now a veteran QB who can keep defenses honest and off CJ. So another possibility of Orton and #2 pick for their #8 and their 1st round pick next year and whatever late-round slots balance things out.

There may be a few other teams who are willing to do some 3rd round pick - and maybe even 2nd round - one-up for Orton. But that sort of trade really does seem like piddling around the edges one year at a time and hoping to improve more than other teams do. Rather than a more fundamental two-year plan for rebuilding.

I guess I really just don't see any 2011 mock drafts so far -- using that #2 slot -- that make me say -- yeah that's exactly who we need to turn things around. I've seen Peterson, Fairley, Dareus, and Bowers -- obviously there is no clear choice -- and just as obviously at least some of those players will still be around a few picks later.

I think some of those people who are being currently mocked with our #2 could easily be around by #7 or #8 too -- with the added bonus that if they are around at #7 or #8 and we've traded-down to #7 or #8, then we have also received more draft slots in 2011 and 2012 as compensation for trading-down. Combining Orton with that trade-down (for two teams at least) turns the trade into a much bigger opportunity for us.

This is a Fan-Created Comment on The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Mile High Report

You must be a member of Mile High Report to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mile High Report. You should read them.

Join Mile High Report

You must be a member of Mile High Report to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mile High Report. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.