Is anyone else worried about our run defense?
The defense overall has been playing out of their minds, and lightyears ahead of where we were last season, or even at the beginning of this season. One thing that has caught my eye though is our run defense, and the fact that for whatever reason, we have been pretty fortunate playing the opposing teams leading rusher.
Like I said we have come a long way from the beginning of the season, but for the context of this post I will only focus on this season. Keep in mind also I am not accounting any receptions or receiving yards by these RBs I am just looking at rushing yards, so if you want to look at TOTAL yards given up to RBs you actually need to add some more onto these numbers.
Week 1 vs the Raiders we gave up 150 yards rushing to McFadden, 30 yards to Michael Bush and 11 to Marcel Reece. Total rushing yards allowed: 191
Week 2 vs Bengals we gave up only 59 yards to Cedric Benson and 10 to Bernard Scott. Total rushing yards allowed: 69
Week 3 for me is where it starts getting interesting...
Week 3 vs Tennessee: We play Tennessee who have CJ2K, but the important thing to remember is when we played them week 3 he had just come from not only having no offseason due to the lockout, but he held out of what little training camp there was because of a contract dispute with the front office. With that being said we hold him to 21 yards, and hold Javon Ringer to -6 yards. Total rushing yards allowed 15
I want to point out however that getting Chris Johnson so early in the season was the most opportune time to play him, and I am sure that nobody here would actually think that we would hold them to only 15 positive yards of rushing over an entire game if we were to play CJ and the Titans this week, especially considering in 3 of his last 5 weeks he hasn't gone under 130 yards rushing, by himself, let alone with Ringer adding to that total.
Week 4 vs Green Bay: I think we all remember this beat down, we held James Starks to 63 yards total and John Kuhn to 3 yards. Total rushing yards allowed 66.
The rushing yards don't tell the whole story though as Aaron Rodgers absolutely torched us and I believe he even ran for a touchdown or 2 (although IIRC they were all from very close). They also had a pick-6 adding to their tally. The fact remains because of what was working for them, they had no need to even try to run the ball, their short passes served as a substitute for the run after they gashed us early and often with the deeper throws. I don't think this game can be seen as a game to evaluate our run defense.
Week 5 vs SD: We finally play a team with a healthy running back and one that is in game condition for the first time since week 1. What happens? We give up 125 yards to Ryan Mathews 24 to Mike Tolbert, and 47 to Jacob Hester. Total rushing yards allowed: 196 (Like I said i am only looking at rushing yards, and if we look at receiving yards accumulated by these RBs i wouldnt be surprised to see the number of total yards well over 200 and into the 230-240 range)
Week 6 is our BYE (goodbye Orton)
Week 7 vs Mia: Played against Reggie Bush and Daniel Thomas (either of those names keeping you up at night? didnt think so). Reggie has been playing better as of late, and our Run D actually does a really good job keeping them in check. We hold Bush to 42 yards and Daniel Thomas to 53 yards. Total rushing yards allowed: 65
Week 8 vs Detroit: Once again a massacre, but in terms of rushing, the Lions did not have their top rusher in Jahvid Best, or Kevin Smith, and they use their TE Pettigrew in those short swing pases as their running game. Overall we did well in the running game holding Maurice Morris to 58 yards rushing and Keiland Williams to 25 but just like the Green Bay game, there was no need for them to even try and run the ball. Total rushing yards allowed: 63.
Week 9 vs Oakland: No McFadden, only 96 yards given up to Michael Bush
Week 10 vs KC: No Jamaal Charles, give up 48 to McCluster, 61 to Jackie Battle, Total rushing yards allowed: 109
Weel 11 vs NYJ: LT gets injured early, As does Shonne Greene after 10 yards, and we're left to deal with the juggernaut RB that is Joe McKnight (sarcasm) Total yards allowed: 69
Week 12 vs SD: Once again with injuries to the top RBs from weeks 8-11, we only had to play the backups and really nobody that an NFL defense shouldnt be able to stop. With SD back on the schedule we finally play a team that will run the ball, and has the means to do so in regards to healthy running backs. What happens? We give up a 137 to Mathews, a career high for him might I add, and 44 yards to Tolbert. Total yards allowed: 181
Week 13 vs Minn: No Adrian Peterson, Gerhart runs for 91
Week 14 vs Chi: No Forte, Marion Barber runs for 108 Khalil Bell for 40. Total yards allowed 148
IMO we have been extremely fortunate to get the RB matchups that we have (CJ2k early on, no AP, no McFadden, no Forte, no LT/Greene, no Jamaal Charles, no Jahvid Best) Going ahead we will play NE who uses the TE as their run game for the most part, Buf, once again without top rusher Fred Jackson and KC without Charles.
We will go an entire season without playing some of the top RBs in the game, even though we will play their respective teams. I find that crazy I don't believe our running game has truly been tested, and when we have been I havent been overly impressed. (Chicago, 2 games vs SD).
I would still want to shore up that Defensive front early in the draft and get a run stuffer up front, but am I wrong for seeing our run D the way I am? I think our success against the run has been more fortune than anything else
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
17 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes, it's a concern
But thankfully the Pats and Chiefs aren’t that good on the ground consistently, so I think we can manage. The big question is in the playoffs, we need to get much better.
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
Most of us have had questions all year
Allen has covered our weakness well. The guys up front are producing well. The only thing we are lacking right now is some studly play from the backside backer. Most of the time, we are able to close the point of attack. The cutback has been where we have struggled most. Our pursuit is not disciplined at the second level, which is why Dawk has been cleaning up for us all year!
by Da Bum on Dec 12, 2011 12:16 PM MST reply actions 1 recs
I’d say the mike is the biggest weakness. Injuries at DT haven’t helped either and Von wasn’t great in the first 5-6 games vs. the run.
Von Miller for DPOY '12
by BroncofanfromBoston on Dec 12, 2011 12:22 PM MST via mobile reply actions
Agreed.
Our average yards per attempt is only respectable because we do get quite a few negative stops. It’s feast or famine generally, either a negative stop or 7+ yards. Something is happening in between that needs to be fixed in the off season.
Nice work uclabruin34!
Glad U put this together. U just saved me the time as I have wanted to see it all together on one page. It has been rather fortunate the way that a lot of the teams we faced, or will face got the injury bug at that same spot. Kudos to the D on the Jets game for sending Shonne Greene to the locker room.
I really don’t know where the problem is, but I think that the summer program, along with the draft this year, will do a lot to help every aspect of our game. But who to draft, and at which position to best help the run D is a tough guess for me.

It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on aimlessly and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
By the numbers through 13 games
4.1 ypc against (13th in the league – best is SF at 3.2 worst is OAK at 5.2)
394 attempts against (4th most in the league)
1614 rushing yards allowed (21st in the league)
81 rushing 1st downs allowed (21st in the league)
6 rushing TDs allowed (tied for 3rd best in the league) – in 2010 the Broncos allowed 26 rushing TDs
If you want to throw up, go compare those numbers to last year to see just how bad the run D was in 2010.
Overall the defense is only giving up 5.3 yards per play (14th in the league – best in BAL at 4.4, worst in NE at 6.2). The league average right now is 5.4.
Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.
Looks like we aught to be able to get the run game going against NE
It is better to keep silent, and appear to be wise, then to ramble on aimlessly and remove all doubt! The Wisest Man, Solomon.
by metalman5050 on Dec 12, 2011 1:09 PM MST up reply actions
Maybe - until I looked at the numbers, I didn't realize how bad the NE D is
They are allowing 7.3 yards per passing play – 4th worst in the league, but they are saved somewhat by snaring 18 INTs – 2nd best in the league.
Against the run they are only giving up 4.3 ypc (same as Denver). Just looking at the numbers, I would say that we might be able to move the ball better against them through the air. Additionally, Walton has been eaten up by massive nose tackles this year and they don’t get much bigger than Wilfork.
Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.
by DE_BroncoFan on Dec 12, 2011 1:17 PM MST up reply actions
I must admit...
as I’ve run through the various playoff scenarios in my head, I typically put the New England game in the loss column. After watching them struggle with the Redskins yesterday, it’s clear that these Patriots aren’t the Patriots of a few years ago.
They’re very beatable. And it seems like we match up well with them – at least when I look at their offensive strength versus our defensive strength. I think Goodman and Dawkins will need to heal quickly. Brady seemed un-Brady-like against the Redskins’ pass rush. He’ll poop his pants against ours.
Truth shall be known.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Dec 12, 2011 1:27 PM MST up reply actions
NE's pass D has given up a league worst 68 passing plays of 20+ yards
for comparison the Broncos have given up 35 and the Steelers (best in the league) have only allowed 29
Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.
by DE_BroncoFan on Dec 12, 2011 1:23 PM MST up reply actions
Hey now, we did face Greene
that wasn’t an act of God, as we knocked him the F out of the game. Credit to our D for that. However, I’m with ya….. the run D needs to tighten up in a hurry. I believe had Dawk not gone out early with the neck stinger, then we give up 60 yards less than we did. Moore is not a run stuffer, Carter is no B Dawk.
I think it was Sadaraine in his last “No Bull” review, who said “just because Joe Mays can lay the wood, does not mean he’s good run stuffer.” IMO, that is so true. I would love to see us draft the best MLB on the board, and coincidentally, right now, there will be a couple who look like the BPA when we pick at 25, 26, 27. Hightower from Bama, or Burfict from ASU.
"If you went to the Fair with this guy and you played that game where you have to throw the ball through the hole..... HE may never get it through the hole, but he's still gonna be walking away with all the stuffed animals" Prime on Tebow!!!
"As iron sharpens iron, so will one man sharpen another"
Yes
Big concern moving forward, need to step it up.
Von Miller doesn't sleep, he waits
by RockyMountainThunder on Dec 12, 2011 2:10 PM MST reply actions
Drafting a big run stuffing DT up front would help a lot
Add a MLB who can tackle and we’d be set
TurfSharks.com
Bunk needs to be resigned
And given help from a stud rookie DT or DE, and we need more of a presence at mike. I think these are the keys to a stout run D for us.
I think both Bunk and Thomas have played good this year.
McBean has kind of dialed down a little bit, but is still doing alright. The thing is though, do the broncos draft a DT knowing that Vickerson and Warren are back next year? If a good DT is there in the first, they will take it—BPA.
by tiderfootball09 on Dec 12, 2011 6:38 PM MST up reply actions
Warren is getting up there in age...
Not to mention, we all know how we’ve done with former Patriots — there’s a reason BB lets them go. I concur, Thomas has played well as well, and McBean has been serviceable.

by 





































