Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

MHR Primer Looks at Sam, Mike, Will and DJ

     How many of us, in our early days of watching football,  have watched an astute quarterback line up under center, then raise up to point towards one of the linebackers and start calling for his blockers to be alert to the movement of Sam? Or Mike? Or Will? Or Then wonder who the heck is Sam? There's nobody on the defense named Sam. Or Will. Or Mike.

     As we learned the game, we came to understand that Sam, Mike, and Will were designations given to the linebackers on the field. We quickly recalled the names of our favorite Broncos linebackers from over the years: Tom Jackson (1973-86), Randy Gradishar (1974-83), Rick Dennison (1982-90), Karl Mecklenburg (1983-94), Simon Fletcher (1985-95), John Mobley (1996-03), Bill Romanowski (1996-01), Ian Gold (2000-03, 2005-07), Al Wilson (1999-06), DJ Williams (2004-Present).

So what are some of the differences between these linebacking positions? Take a jump and find out.

Star-divide

A Quick Reminder About Strong Side vs Weak Side

     I think it's important to start out any discussion of the linebacking positions by reminding ourselves what the terms "strong side" and "weak side" mean, since Sam, Mike, and Will are all in reference to those two terms. Simply put, the strong side in a one tight end set is the side of the offensive line on which the tight end lines up before the snap. The weak side is the opposite of the offensive line. Thus if the tight end lines up next to the right tackle, the right side of the offensive line is the strong side, the left side is the weak side. In a formation that does not have a tight end, or has more than one tight end, the strong side is the side with the most offensive players on, or near the line of scrimmage.

Linebackers in General

     As the game of football has evolved to include the use of the forward pass, defenses developed the role of linebackers. These are players who are quick, agile, able to move from sideline to sideline, shed blockers, rush the quarterback, and cover receivers. They need to be good tacklers, strong, nimble and be great hitters. They must be smart and not only know their own assignments but also the responsibilities of the entire defense. Typically, linebackers begin a play in an upright, two-point stance, three to five yards off the line of scrimmage. There are two basic types of linebackers: Inside (Mike) and Outside (Sam and Will).

Inside Linebacker -- Mike

     According to many sources, the concept of a middle linebacker was introduced by the Chicago Bears in the early 1950s. This player is usually seen as being the quarterback of the defense. He is the one responsible for letting the rest of the defense know what play the coaches have called. He is also the one responsibility for calling out defensive audibles as he reads the offense. The Mike is considered to be a pivotal point for the defense. Most teams want a player who is a jack-of-all-trades. The Mike is often the team's leader in tackles.

Mike: Characteristics
     Teams look for a player who is big, strong and able to be a physical tackler on play after play. They want a player who likes to hit hard and can drop the best running backs in the league. They look for a player who can also drop back into pass coverage. Overall athleticism is stressed.

Mike: Primary Responsibilities
In General: He watches the offensive players then keys on the offensive linemen. His eyes on the running back will give him the play direction, the offensive linemen will let him know wether it is a run or a pass -- if the linemen stay low and block hard, he will read the play as a run. If the linemen rise quickly into an upright stance, he will read the play as a pass. Typically, he lines up three to five yards deep directly across from the center.

On Runs: He is the key run stopper and is typically in on nearly every tackle. He may take on a lead block to force the runner back towards the other defenders. He is usually assigned to fill the inside gaps -- that is, to act as a "gap destroyer" to disrupt the running play.

On Passes: He will drop into  a specific role based on the coverage that is called. He may be asked to blitz the quarterback. In a coverage like the Tampa 2, he may be asked to drop back to cover the deep middle of the field.

Mike: D. J. Williams
     In 2007, Mike Shanahan decided changes needed to be made to the Broncos' defense. Two important moves were made: the firing of defensive coordinator Larry Coyer and the moving of Williams to the Mike position. Williams started sixteen games. He recorded one sack. He had no interceptions and defensed five passes. He forced two fumbles and recovered two fumbles. He finished the season with 106 tackles and 35 assists.

Outside Linebacker -- Sam

     The Sam linebacker lines up opposite the strong side of the offensive formation, usually between five and eight yards off the line of scrimmage depending on the defense that has been called. Sam is normally found lined up over the tight end. If there is not a tight end in the formation, the Sam will typically line up between the last player on the offensive line and the inside slot receiver.

Sam: Characteristics
     He is usually the strongest of the linebackers, given that he has to be able to withstand blocks from the tight end, shed those blocks and then make a play. The Sam is a versatile player who can both defend against the run and drop into coverage on passing plays. Many coaches see versatility and speed as being the Sam's critical traits.

Sam: Primary Responsibilities

In General: The Sam keys on the tight end. If the tight end stays low and blocks hard, the Sam will read the play as a run. If the tight end looks like he's trying to shed the block of the defensive end and gain separation from the line of scrimmage, the Sam will read the play as a pass.

On Runs: The Sam is tasked with taking on the running back coming to the strong side of the formation. It is his responsibility to make sure the running back is not able to get around the end of the line of scrimmage. The Sam will fill his gap on the run and make the tackle if the play comes to him. If the play flows to the weak side, the Sam is usually assigned to guard a cutback "A" gap to guard against the running back cutting the play back to the inside.

On Passes: If the defense has called man-to-man coverage, the Sam will be assigned to cover either the tight end or the number two or three receiver. If a zone coverage has been called, the Sam is responsible for a short zone, typically keying on a running back coming out of the backfield, or covering a deep hook or curl zone. When dropping back into a zone coverage, the Sam must keep his eyes on the quarterback in order to move on the ball the moment it is thrown.

Sam: D. J. Williams
     After playing predominantly a Will position for his first two years, Williams was moved to the Sam position for the 2006 season. As a Sam, he started fifteen out of sixteen games, He recorded 1 sack, no interceptions, and defensed 2 passes. He forced one fumble. He finished the season with 59 tackles and 17 assists. He struggled to contain tight ends and was considered by many to have had very little impact in any of the games.

Outside Linebacker -- Will

     The Will linebacker lines up on the weak side of the offensive formation. His first focus is on stoppping the run, but he must also be agile enough to drop into pass coverage. He will usually line up five to six yards off the line of scrimmage and position himself in the B gap on the weak side of the offense.

Will: Characteristics
     The Will linebacker is usually the fastest of the three linebackers due to the fact that he is often chasing the play from behind. Coaches look for an ability to move cleanly through the traffic created by the offensive blockers. The Will is also expected to be agile and quick. He has to be able to move very well in a lateral direction and cross a great deal of the field. He is often the most athletic of the three. He is expected to be smart enough to read plays quickly and determine where to position himself. He must also be able to handle an occasional one-on-one pass coverage situation.

Will: Primary Responsibilities
In General: The Will takes his key from the offensive linemen, and keeps himself in a good position to stop a run if it comes to his side, but is also alert to the need to drop into coverage or pick up a running back coming out of the backfield on a passing play. He usually does not take on offensive linemen directly.

On Runs: His first task is to force the running back to the inside of the formation, as well was guarding against any cutback or reverse plays. If he reads a run aimed at his side of the defense, the Will moves to take on the lead blocker to force the run back to the inside. If the run moves away from him, his job is to seal up the backside of the play to prevent a cutback or reverse of direction.

On Passes: If there is a slot receiver on his side, he will move more to the outside of the line so that he can cover the slot receiver is the play is a pass. If man-to-man coverage has been called, the Will usually picks up the running back coming out of the backfield. If zone coverage has been called, he is usually responsible for the flat, hook and curl areas of the zone.

Will: D. J. Williams
     Williams was drafted in 2004 and brought on board to be a Will linebacker. He played in this position during his first two years, but shared snaps with Ian Gold in 2005. Williams was often taken out on 3rd down situations in favor of Gold. He also suffered from poor communication with Larry Coyer who later admitted that he did not adequately game plan for Williams' presence. After being moved to the Mike and Sam positions, Williams returned to the Will position in 2008. During these three years as a Will, Williams started thirty-nine out of forty-eight games. He recorded 4.5 sacks, had one interception and defensed twelve passes. He forced three fumbles and recovered a fumble. He registered 190 tackles and 74 assists.

An Aside About 3-4 Defenses

     As the name implies, the 3-4 defense uses four linebackers. In the 3-4, the Will linebacker typically plays as an inside linebacker on the weak side of the offensive formation. The fourth linebacker is set to the outside of the Will and is often known as the "Jack" linebacker. The Jack linebacker is typically more responsible for pass rushing then run defense or pass coverage. The Jack is often a hybrid defensive end/linebacker.

     When Denver moved to the 3-4 defense under Mike Nolan, D. J. Williams took on the Will role in that defense. He started thirty-one out of thirty-two games, recorded nine sacks, no interceptions and sixteen passes defensed. He forced three fumbles and recovered three fumbles. He logged 193 tackles and 47 assists. This marked the first time in Williams career that he was allowed to play two consecutive seasons at the same position as primary player at that position. He showed improvement from 2009 to 2010.

The Return to a 4-3 Defense

     Hopefully with the return to a 4-3 defense under John Fox and Dennis Allen, Williams will be allowed to remain at the Will position for which he was originally drafted. As Jeremy Bollander once said:


"DJ was a WLB, and until he played WLB, he could never be the player we drafted him to be."

It will be interesting to see who Fox and Allen tap to play the Sam and Mike positions alongside Williams.

Comment 48 comments  |  18 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Mile High Report

Seas of Change

Jul 2011 by Tim Lynch - 46 comments

Comments

Display:

really nice work

ive always liked DJ, hope he sticks around
btw nice title to your work

"Have you ever heard of the emancipation proclamation?"
- "I don't listen to hip-hop"

by BroncoJoe311 on Mar 7, 2011 8:28 AM MST reply actions  

Thanks, glad you enjoyed both the article and the title. :)

I hope D J is given the time & chance to show what he can really do

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 8:51 AM MST up reply actions  

Good work!

Take my advice... I'm not using it!
"If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague."

by BroncTastic on Mar 7, 2011 8:51 AM MST reply actions  

Thanks BT

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 12:54 PM MST up reply actions  

Great article!

2/3 of the earth is covered by water the other 1/3 is covered by Champ Bailey!

THIS IS BRONCOS COUNTRY!!!

by The 3 Amigos on Mar 7, 2011 9:11 AM MST reply actions  

Thanks

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 12:54 PM MST up reply actions  

this....

is why I love MHR

by mikebirty on Mar 7, 2011 9:15 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

Me too.

I learn something from every article I read — both front page and fanpost.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 12:55 PM MST up reply actions  

Love it.

Brian, thanks for writing this article – very informative. With a return to the 4-3, I’d been wondering how our LB-corps would shake out and where DJ would best suited, which you covered well. What are your thoughts about drafting Von Miller, who also seems best suited to playing Will?

by fatboyjam on Mar 7, 2011 9:45 AM MST reply actions  

 Miller is a pass rush specialist which in a 4-3 defense would be best suited as the middle lb. The middle lb is the one in a 4-3 that will blitz if a blitz is called for.

by broncs27 on Mar 7, 2011 10:46 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

Not really

I’ve always seen Sams blitzing more than the Mike…. think Orakpo his rookie year in Washington. That is the role I see Miller in if we grab him.

Von Miller’’s best spot is the “Jack” linebacker in a 3-4… but we already have that in Doom. Miller is one of those classic “tweener” positions. He’s athletic enough to succeed as a 4-3 backer, but not sure we want to take on a project at the #2 pick… regardless how high that potential maybe if it works out. Now if we trade down….

I love Miller, but he’s not a great fit for us, at least at #2.

by cjfarls on Mar 7, 2011 11:57 AM MST up reply actions  

I've not had a chance to look at Miller

And I’m not particularly good at projecting which college players would be well suited to what Denver wants to do. I leave that for the many writers that we have that are good at it. :)

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 12:56 PM MST up reply actions  

Just a super job, Brian . . .

And that is not just because I agree with you, as I do. I have been crying for DJ to remain at Will for his entire career. What the Broncos have done is to take a potential Blue Chip player and waste the bulk of his career so far with poor job fit. DJ is a Will, a whole Will, and nothing but a Will. Put him back there, and keep him there, and he will do a great job, IMO . . .

BILLY THOMPSON GOT SHAFTED!!

by AZDynamics on Mar 7, 2011 10:12 AM MST reply actions  

Love it:
DJ is a Will, a whole Will, and nothing but a Will

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 12:56 PM MST up reply actions  

DJ tackling is weak

The weakness of the Bronco defense the last several years is when teams run directly at DJ no matter Will, Sam or Mike when they find him and don’t block him or more often than not he intentionally runs into a blocker, it is usually a big play. If you go back over all the games this year when the defense breaks down it is DJ that missed the tackle or was driven several yards off the line of scrimmage. Schemes had little to do with DJ,s failures!

by kimo526 on Mar 7, 2011 5:56 PM MST up reply actions  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmKv38zGwi0&feature=related

Change your opinions, keep to your principles; change your leaves, keep intact your roots.

by Jeremy Bolander on Mar 8, 2011 12:48 AM MST up reply actions  

So as of right now here are the options we have at LB

If DJ plays WILL then we’d have Mays as the MIKE and Haggan as the SAM. If DJ plays MIKE, we’d have Woodyard at WILL and Haggan/Mays at SAM. If DJ plays SAM we’d have Woodyard at WILL and Mays/Haggan at MIKE.

Which one you like best, take your pick.

And now for something completely different

by AlbertaBronc on Mar 7, 2011 10:27 AM MST reply actions  

Although now that I think about it

If Haggan sticks with the team there’s a good chance he’d be moved back to DE which is the position he played in college. He did have a couple sacks last year as well didn’t he.

And now for something completely different

by AlbertaBronc on Mar 7, 2011 10:32 AM MST up reply actions  

I like this:

Mike: Mays / Woodyard (situational)
Will: DJ
Sam: Haggan (or someone better through draft / FA)

"Bombs dropping down overhead. Underground. It's instilled to want to live." -EV

by sadaraine on Mar 7, 2011 11:27 AM MST up reply actions  

That could work

We could use Mays as the MIKE and then substitute him for Woodyard in nickel and dime packages and on passing downs.

And now for something completely different

by AlbertaBronc on Mar 7, 2011 11:31 AM MST up reply actions  

Potentially OK

though that 1st down/Run down lineup looks really susceptible to teams with fast RBs/TEs, who would like just terroize Mays/Haggan, particularly with our relatively slow/poor coverage safeties… I just don’t think Mays and Haggan move laterally good enough for the wider field responsibilities demanded of 4-3 backers. 3-4 schemes narrow the field and let them move vertically, which plays to their strengths (and even then they were mediocre)… 4-3 responsibilities create big question marks.

If we got a better SLB and coverage safety (McBath stay healthy?) I could see a Mays/Woodyard combo working as a stopgap at MIKE though. I probably still prefer a lineup with both DJ and WW on the field at the sametime (given our current options), but its an idea.

by cjfarls on Mar 7, 2011 12:08 PM MST up reply actions  

I really believe that we need DJ at the Will

For the others, I’m not really sure

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 12:58 PM MST up reply actions  

Top read

Thanks for another good post

by Dan Hart on Mar 7, 2011 10:55 AM MST via mobile reply actions  

You're welcome, thanks for the kind words

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 12:59 PM MST up reply actions  

Great read!!

Thanks for the class!!!

by wisco on Mar 7, 2011 11:13 AM MST reply actions  

Thanks for being there when I took role. ;-p

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 12:59 PM MST up reply actions  

Wasn't DJ playing the Mike when he had his best year in 2007?

He had 141 tackles, 2 FFs, 2 FRs, 5 PDs and 1 Int. I just looked it up; yeah, he played Mike that year. He then moved to Sam in ‘08 and performed badly. I’m not saying he’s necessarily a better Mike than a Will, only that he can play both interchangeably. The optimum solution is always to put your players where they are best. In a stiuation where a guy can play two positions virtually interchangeably, then you focus more on the personnel you have and give DJ the position that they can’t fill. In this particular case, we could very easily need Woodyard to start at linebacker. He’s too small to go against TEs on the strong side, especially in the AFC West. He’s also not built to hold up against the run all season long as a Mike. To me, this means that Woodyard could very well dictate where DJ plays. If we need Wood to start, it’s going to be as a Will, which means DJ takes the role of the Mike.

Personally, I think DJ as the Mike has never really caught on not because he’s not good at it, but because he’s not the vocal leader and hard hitter you want there. This season, though, we may not have a better option.

Really fantastic article, btw. Very rec’d

"The nice thing when you’re the second pick is that you’re going to get a player of that worthiness as well as a player of need." John Fox said suck it, Patrick Peterson lovers;-)!!

by Rodney A on Mar 7, 2011 12:45 PM MST reply actions  

the problem with him at MLB was

…most of those tackles came 5+ yards downfield. FootballOutsiders, who tracks tackles by distance downfield was highly unimpressed by DJs performance in ’07.

Now, a decent argument could be made that the cruddy play in front of him contributed heavily to his poor performance. From my anectdotal scouting of his play, DJ looked slow to react, which may have been about thinking too much while playing in a “new” position too. So there is definite room/possibility for improvement.

Unfortunately, he also often failed to shed the lead blocker coming through the hole… a regular problem for him (whihc is also why he struggled as a SAM). As a Will, he won’t typically be at the point of attack so that poor part of his game is minimized.

The team’s problem is that WW has the same skillset as DJ… really good at flowing to the ball through traffic, but poor at the point. Comparatively, DJ is actually probably better at shedding that intial block… So does it make sense to maximize DJ and play him as a Will, or to maximize overall team speed/talent and get WW and DJ in at the same time? The alternative is putting in someone like Mays/Haggan asMLB, but then you sacrifice lateral speed and open up a whole host of other problems.

Basically, we need better players. I don’t see a great MLB on the team, but DJ is probably the best case.

by cjfarls on Mar 7, 2011 1:04 PM MST up reply actions  

Good points

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 1:17 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes, very good points

We come to the same overall conclusion. DJ isn’t ideal and probably plays best on the WS, but if we played tomorrow, he’d have to Mike the middle and Woody would be at Will. We certainly need additions and I don’t think Haggan can be anything more than situational as a LB in this defense. Nice point on those tackles and stats from F.O.

"The nice thing when you’re the second pick is that you’re going to get a player of that worthiness as well as a player of need." John Fox said suck it, Patrick Peterson lovers;-)!!

by Rodney A on Mar 7, 2011 4:28 PM MST up reply actions  

You may well be right.

It’s a trade off. I’m not sure that Williams is the kind of LB who strikes fear into the hearts of running backs, which is a trait that you often hear attributed to the Mike position.

But as you said, a lot will depend on what other personnel are available.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 1:06 PM MST up reply actions  

DJ sucks

He can’t shed blockers, he’s behind the play, he makes tackles 7-10 yards downfield. He should be traded. We need to draft a Will (Vonn?) and sign a Sam, play Mays or Woodyard as the ILB (although Mays can’t really cover).

If people aren't supposed to eat animals, why are they made out of meat??

by BigDave on Mar 7, 2011 1:03 PM MST reply actions  

If DJ really sucks, that is a sad commentary on the rest of our defense

In 2004 as a rookie and a Will LB he led the Broncos in tackles.
In 2005, splitting snaps with Ian Gold at the Will position, he dropped to 7th on the team.
In 2006, he was moved to Sam LB and rose to 6th on the team in tackles
In 2007, he was moved to Mike LB and led the team in tackles
In 2008, he was Will in a 4-3 and was 2nd on the team in tackles
In 2009-10, he was Will in a 3-4 and led the team in tackles both years.

So he played a position one year, then shared snaps in his second, was moved to a different position in his third, moved to a third position in his fourth, moved back to his original position in his fifth, then to a variation of his original in a different alignment in his sixth and seventh years.

I’m inclined to wonder how much of his struggles have had to do with the way he has been moved around as it has with whether or not he’s good.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 1:16 PM MST up reply actions  

Also, the year he moved back to Will (2008)

he got injured for the first time in his career and missed five games.

Change your opinions, keep to your principles; change your leaves, keep intact your roots.

by Jeremy Bolander on Mar 7, 2011 1:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Thanks, Jeremy

I forgot to include that

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 1:37 PM MST up reply actions  

no, DJ doesn't"suck"

DJ does some things poorly, but he other things better than the average player too (flow to ball through traffic, pursuit speed, etc.). Focusing on his worst skill (shedding blockers) and ignoring his strengths is an unfair evaluation of his talents.

As a 4-3 Will, DJ’s major weakness is almost wholely eliminated by scheme… if he’s getting hit at the point-of-attack by blockers as a Will, that means someone else in front of him is not doing their job. This was happening all the time in 2010 (Baltimore had a blocker in his face on just about every play). While DJ’s weakness in shedding blockers means he will be less effective in covering their problems, the failure overall is not his fault.

DJ isn’t a HOFer with few/no weaknesses like a Ray Lewis in his prime, etc. But he can be a very good to great player if put in a position to utilize his strengths and minimize his weaknesses. DJ would be a perennial probowler/allpro as a Will on a team like Tenn, Philly or NYG where he had good lineplay in front of him. In Denver, he gets exposed to things he shouldn’t be (by scheme) and suffers for it.

All that said, I think WW has similar potential, similar strengths/weaknesses, and is much cheaper. At some point, I expect we decide not to keep one of them…

by cjfarls on Mar 7, 2011 2:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Thanks

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 1:16 PM MST up reply actions  

Great read Brian!

I always thought Sam should be Strong side…. Will would be weak-side… Mike, middle… I guess intuition can be a zinger sometimes. = )

Good stuff though, yet another example of the many great supplements to MHR!

A pessimist sees the difficulties in every opportunity.
An optimist sees the opportunities in every difficulty.
- Winston Churchill

First (and only, in our lifetimes) team to three consecutive SB wins!!!! ( =

by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Mar 7, 2011 1:32 PM MST reply actions  

Amazing how the mind works, huh? ;-p

Thanks for the kind words.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 1:37 PM MST up reply actions  

Thanks for the hardwork Brian...

I like Woodyard a lot. I’d like to see him on the field as a starter. He is one of our best LBs at pursuing to the ball and is one of our best athletes on the team. I think, given the chance, he could be a very good Mike. I also like Mays, he and Woodyard both reminded me of each other. Is he stout enough to play the Sam? I’d like to see Williams (Will), Woodyard (Mike) and Mays (Sam) I don’t buy into what some guys say when they say that Woodyard is seen everyday by the coaches, and if he had the ability he would be starting. Plenty of guys out there starting, and some in the pro bowl who coaches felt were not starters. Sometimes a guy gets a back-up label and it sticks. Coaches are notorious for group-think. Heck, just look at our very own Lloyd! All I know is that when in the game Woodyard is always around the ball, same as Mays. Haggan? Take him or leave him, good guy, great to have on the team, but a back-up, the rest?… stiffs.

"I'm very important. I have many leather-bound books and my apartment smells of rich mahogany."

by rubincarterrocks on Mar 7, 2011 2:11 PM MST reply actions  

Thanks for the addition.

I think the only hesitation I would have on Woodyard at Mike would be whether or not his size might be a detriment: pro-football-reference.com lists him at 6-1 and 219lbs in 2010.

When you look at other Mikes who are often listed among the top at their position (Patrick Willis — SF, Jon Beason — Car, Barrett Ruud — TB, Curtis Lofton — Atl, David Harris — Hou, Ray Lewis — Bal, etc) you see guys who are the same basic height as Woodyard (6-0 to 6-2) but who range from 237 to 250 pounds.

My question would be whether or not, due to his size, Woodyard would be able to take the pounding that a Mike has to both give and receive.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 3:45 PM MST up reply actions  

Woodyard is too small to be a Mike

Will, yes, he can. But then we have 2 (DJ and Woodyard). That’s the puzzle. But then again no team has absolute best personnel for all positions and no need to solve puzzles.

by si_ice on Mar 7, 2011 7:31 PM MST up reply actions  

This is an excellent article that

I will read many times. Thank you for this. Could you do something similar on a 4-3 defensive line? Specifically, what kind of scheme did John Fox run? Also, how many different variations of the 4-3 defense currently exist in the NFL? What are the roles of the DE’s and DT’s?

Again, thanks a lot. A true reference piece for me.

by swg777 on Mar 7, 2011 7:15 PM MST reply actions  

I'll add your request to my list of topics for MHR Primer. :)

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 11:37 PM MST up reply actions  

And thanks for the kind words

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 11:38 PM MST up reply actions  

Once again, thanks for awesome info on the intricacies of the game

I love learning about this incredibly (let’s be honest, stupidly) complicated game.

As for DJ, he’ll never be the greatest LB, but I’m sure he’ll be more than handy with a return to the 4-3, a better focus on defence (given the HC is a defensive coach) and probably also by a better D-line after the draft (whether first round pick or later). And getting Doom back.

Julian from Australia

by j-mac31 on Mar 7, 2011 8:02 PM MST reply actions  

I agree that I hope to see some improvements on defense

As you said: a defensive minded coach, return of Doom, and hopefully some additions to the d-line. All should help.

We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough

by Brian Shrout on Mar 7, 2011 11:39 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

P1_plummer_small
For those Bronco Fans Who have served....
Imgres_small
Are You Nuts? No Plan B?

Recent FanPosts

Imgres_small
Running Backs, The Shortest Tenured Position.
Angels_small
Moreno Out the Door this Offseason
Small
What Do You Expect From Our Draftees ?
Small
An in depth look at "PLAN A"
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick Really Worth? Pt. 2.
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
Glad for Gronkowski
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick REALLY Worth?
Index_small
Nate Irving!
Fhgfhgfhg_small
Rod Smith is a Hall of Famer....Right?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Broncos-von-miller_small Scotty Payne

Ph_small BroncoPH

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall