2011 NFL Draft: Potent Quotables - Denver Broncos Head Coach John Fox
We've heard from the newest Denver Broncos - safety Rahim Moore, offensive lineman Orlando Franklin and linerbacker Nate Irving. Now it is the head coach's turn to speak about the Broncos' 2011 NFL Draft so far.
On trading down in the second round
"I think anytime you trade back, you are going to be losing a pool of players. I thought it was important coming into the draft that we acquire a fourth and fifth-round pick, which we did not have. It is that type of draft that we think is very strong low and very good high. In the middle, it was a matter of opinion. At this point, I probably would have felt better if we could have gotten a defensive tackle. A little bit earlier, we had some guys in mind and did not get there because they were selected by somebody else. But, there is still a lot of draft left. We still have tomorrow and there are still some guys there that we have interest in. We have free agency and there are some guys of interest there."
On whether there was a specific pick that they looked at using on a defensive tackle
"Well, I think coming into the draft-it is a deep draft and there are still guys on the board that we have interest in. Every draft has its own personality and the way this one was falling, we acquired guys that are going to make us a better football team."
On whether he feels like they have drafted four starters with their first four picks
"I think we have guys that we feel like can do that. One of the things I think, having done this for some time that helps you, is to create competition. I think we have a good corps of guys here now, and we will inject this group into it and we have created a lot of competition with some very young, talented guys so far in this draft."
On which position T Orlando Franklin will play
"I think we were pretty specific with (T) Orlando (Franklin) just because that is his makeup and that is how he is built. I do not like defining players this early in the process, because they can surprise you. Right now, I think that is the area that we have an opening, potentially, and we will go from there. We have to have some depth there anyways."
On whether he sees any of the defensive tackles currently on the board as immediate starters
"I think we have guys on our team now that can start. It is not like we have nobody (here). I think anytime you do (trade) down, you risk losing players. That is all a part of the process. The names you mentioned are guys that were on our board. I am not sure that if we had stayed up there, they would have been the people that we would have selected. There is still depth at the end of the draft. We will look at that and then if we do not accomplish it there, we will look at the next player pool (free agency) when that develops."
On whether they considered trading back up to get a defensive lineman
"There were a lot of conversations. Part of the reason to move back was to acquire those picks, so to turn around lose those picks and move back up did not make much sense to us at that time."
On what he likes about S Rahim Moore
"Well, first of all, his ball skills. He is big about taking the ball away on defense, whether it is on downs or interceptions or fumble recoveries. So, he has great ball skills and he has a lot of interceptions-maybe more than anybody in the draft. He is athletic, he is a smart guy and understands football and loves football and was a pretty good pick."
On players being allowed back into the building
"We got a lot accomplished-meetings and just football stuff. This is a football building; it's been a little strange with no football players. That part was fun for the people that work in the building, and I know it was for the coaches. It might be short lived, but it was a good day."
On communicating with the 2011 draft picks
"We did have Von Miller in today, and we were able to give him some information while he was in the building. Really with what moves forward, we're in communication on that."
On T Orlando Franklin
"Part of what we're going to do is run the ball. It doesn't all revolve around the quarterback or the passing game. He's big and physical and knocks people off the ball. He gets his hands on you and you're usually going the other way. That was something that was impressive."
On whether they thought about picking a running back
"Yeah I think running back is another area. The problem is that we have a lot of needs, and we've only had three rounds in the draft, so we haven't met all those needs at this point. We still have (rounds) four through seven tomorrow as well as the next player pool when that arrives."
On whether the labor situation will make it difficult to get the rookies ready
"That's obviously something I don't have control over. I probably don't feel any worse or better than anybody else."
On LB Nate Irvings' previous injuries
"I think there are a lot of guys walking around with plates and screws, but they play football. He's checked out fine medically. (Head Athletic Trainer) Steve (Antonopulos) does a great job. We wouldn't have taken him if we didn't feel good about it."
On this years' draft compared to last year
"Like I said earlier, they're all different. I think I had the same input in years past. Last year was a little bit unique because there was pretty good knowledge that it was my last year. This was a lot more fun."
On whether Nate Irving will play inside or outside linebacker
"Nate probably doesn't realize it because he has skills to do both. He did both in college. We did a lot of research. He's a terrific player. He plays football very physically, and yet he does have the skill set as far as catching the ball and making plays on the outside and the inside. He's a guy we had our eyes on all the way. He's a guy we identify with what we're doing. Not a lot of these guys are current players that we can see play. We've seen them on tape, but we hadn't had a practice with them yet. Our new players are the same, so we'll get a chance to watch them and see how they work. We'll see what their skill set is. They'll define what their positions are."
On which current players have the potential to play middle linebacker
"I'd like to have had minicamp before now, but we're trying to accumulate players that fit into what we are trying to do and let them define where their positions are."
On how he slept last night
"Shortly. I didn't get a lot of sleep. By the time I got home, it was a fast night, but I slept well. We met until 12:30 (a.m.) or so, then got back and probably got about seven hours of sleep, six hours of sleep. I slept fine. We took care of most of it last night with a lot of our possibilities."
On Da'Quan Bowers' slide late into the second round
"Our league can be very scrutinized. We scrutinize the players we are about to invest in. I think medically there were some concerns. I feel bad for Da'Quan. He's a great kid, but I think it (his knee injury) caused him to slip some. I'm sure he's going to do just fine."
On addressing the rush defense in the draft
"I think we have a lot of holes, as I mentioned before. We have (rounds) four through seven tomorrow. We get back to work, and we know there will be options out there on the other player pool. We'll just take it a day at a time."
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes, free agency is where they will look to get help at DT and no, I doubt they will just look at castoffs like the previous regimes always seemed to do. Signing Mebane and trading a late pick for Okoye would be my choice, but who knows.
Its nice to see they didn’t panic.
by always broncs on Apr 29, 2011 9:49 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
I’m actually feeling ok about the draft thus far now that I’ve taken a step back. the reality is that we are the second worst team in the NFL, which means we have a lot of holes – certainly more than DT. I know people around here are upset that we didn’t grab Austin or Paea (I was one of them), but there’s a reason Fox/Xanders/Elway didn’t take either of them. Just because we haven’t addressed the DT thing doesn’t mean the other spots (OL, S, LB) weren’t needs. All of them were huge needs, because our team is awful and frankly has a lot of holes.
Out of all the guys we got, I’m fairly happy with all of them, although I’m admittedly a little skeptical about Franklin due to some of McGeorge’s comments. Other than that, I think if everyone takes a deep breath and steps back – the draft has been just fine thus far.
I was especially happy to see Fox say they didn’t think it made sense to trade down only to give up those picks to trade right back up. McDaniels did that a few times and it never really made a lot of sense. Be patient, and let the draft come to you.
Agreed Scooter
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Apr 29, 2011 9:56 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Coach Fox rarely takes DTs early. He doesn’t have too since they have a very specific job in his D….occupy.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Apr 29, 2011 9:57 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Congrats Coach Fox
On getting another edge rusher, more athleticism at LB and a ball hawk safety. Already the defense seems more like a John Fox defense.
Hopefully you get your typical late round big body to occupy blocker to finish off your defensive build. Looking forward to more playmakers on that side.
"You can make mistakes, but you are not a failure until you blame others for those mistakes." -John Wooden
by Randall15 on Apr 29, 2011 9:54 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
What about Haynesworth in FA?
I was talking with my brother today about it and he said that since we are going back to 4-3 and Haynesworth wants to play in that system.. Why not give him a chance? He is a giant body upfront and when he plays in the 4-3 he is probably one of the top DT’s in that system. Give him incentives in his contract for showing up to meetings and stuff like that, and if he doesn’t cooperate then you can release him.. But I say give him a shot, Fox and Elway I think could keep him under control and he would be a disruptive force for us..
he would come with too large of a price tag. If he would be willing to take a HUGE pay cut from what he was getting before I would say, take a chance, but otherwise all we really need is someone to stop the run and hold the O-line so the DE’s can sack the QB
Actually, his 2011 salary isn't too bad
He was paid most of the $100 million by Washington already. Its his maturity, personality, and criminal exposure that give me pause (he’s facing sexual assault charges now that carry jail time.
by OrangeandBluesBros on Apr 30, 2011 7:27 AM MDT up reply actions
Washington has not addressed their QB issues. Neither has Arizona.
Orton is gong to be on the block, and Haynesworth looks to be finished in D.C.
Certainly Haynesworth is no angel, but he is the same guy that WASH paid 100 million to. The new criminal charge is nothing, and Shanahan obviously alienated him with the tests, suspensions, making him watch practice, etc. Most of his “attittude” problems with authority are problems he’s had in the last 12-16 mos. That’s an episode, not biography.
if it be not now, yet it will come: the readiness is all. - -Shakespeare
I'm way confused
Can someone help me read the tea leaves? Apparently one of the questioners asked about a couple of DT names, but it’s not in the transcript. But Fox mentions “those names you mentioned were on our board”.
But those names can’t be Austin/Paea. He said any time you trade back you risk losing players. But those two players were available both at #36 and #45.
I guess they were really hoping to get Muhammed Wilkerson or something?? Or was there some other player between #36 and #45 they really wanted? Maybe they weren’t really intent on DT at all?…
Or wait… I just reviewed round #2. Maybe it’s that they really were hoping for Jarvis Jenkins? Took a risk trading down, and lost Jenkins?
Yup.
Jarvis Jenkins was probably our guy.
Follow me on Twitter: ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder
"They said I couldn't be a high school quarterback, they said I couldn't get a D1 scholarship. You're not good enough, you're not skilled enough. They said I couldn't win a heisman. They said I couldn't win a national championship. They said I wouldn't be a first round draft pick. They said I couldn't play in the league. Appreciate that." - Tim Tebow.
And
Drake Nevis and Kendrik Ellis were a kind of plan B too, but both were gone in the late 3rd =(
by Fabio Brazil on Apr 29, 2011 10:46 PM MDT up reply actions
yeah I gathered as much as well
I would have really liked Jenkins and Moore at 45 and 46, that would’ve been awesome. But they let the board come to them, so I can’t get too mad
If you reply to a comment/post/fanshot of mine, I will more likely then not respond to it, unless you come off like a d-bag.
by DBroncs1414 on Apr 29, 2011 11:25 PM MDT up reply actions
I think that honestly they may not have felt very wrongly about any DTs
That includes Dareus. Fox didn’t draft any DTs in his first two years at Carolina. (haven’t looked further yet)
Check out my blog about undergraduate science research
by black_knight101 on Apr 29, 2011 10:45 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Meant very strongly, sorry
Check out my blog about undergraduate science research
by black_knight101 on Apr 29, 2011 10:47 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
What about Kris Jenkins?
I'm not your friend, buddy!
He's not your buddy, guy!
I'm not your guy, friend!
PSN ID: Zo-gernaut
"They got Okoye at fullback" - Marc Munford
"I don't give a f**k. He can play wide receiver." Steve Atwater
I'm glad someone else noticed that
I wasn’t sure what he wanted, but I agree with the above that we really didn’t love any players, which is weird, because both players were character or injury risk, then we kinda drafted players with identical issues. The picks are growing on me, I just assume we are going to regret, seriously regret, not taking Marvin Austin.
by Jarom Moore on Apr 29, 2011 11:46 PM MDT up reply actions
I'd be fine
with Denver signed the DT Barry Cofield from NYG and just make due with him and Big Vick. I honestly dont see the big deal with not making at DT picks so far. we’ve added great players on defense, the side of the ball where we could use help from all positions. We have to be patient. its gonna take a good 2-3 years to get the defense back to respectability. I think John Fox is our guy to do just that. Overall, im pretty excited with the talent we’ve added so far. GO BRONCOS!
by jbbroncosfan27 on Apr 29, 2011 10:10 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
It would be awesome
But Cofield already said he would like to return to NY and the nyg already said they want him back =\
by Fabio Brazil on Apr 29, 2011 10:46 PM MDT up reply actions
We need help everywhere this will take time
by always broncs on Apr 29, 2011 10:11 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
I'd be fine
with Denver signing the DT Barry Cofield from NYG and just make due with him and Big Vick. I honestly dont see the big deal with not making at DT picks so far. we’ve added great players on defense, the side of the ball where we could use help from all positions. We have to be patient. its gonna take a good 2-3 years to get the defense back to respectability. I think John Fox is our guy to do just that. Overall, im pretty excited with the talent we’ve added so far. GO BRONCOS!
by jbbroncosfan27 on Apr 29, 2011 10:11 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
hell ya
For the love of the animals. 24
ps3 handle KINGbaboon
by Earthtiger24 on Apr 29, 2011 10:26 PM MDT up reply actions
Our glaring weaknesses on defense were Mario Haggan and Brian Dawkins
This draft may help with that. In addition we have Ross Hochstein which is the worst player I have seen ever fielded by the Denver Broncos. He is our main backup on our line and will play terribly at multiple positions on a moments notice. Now we have 2, at the very least respectable tackles in Beadles and Franklin. If Harris stays even better. We can use Franklin to backup the guard position or create some competition for beadles.
Look for us to go aftre Jerrell Powe or Ian Williams tomorrow. Both great pluggers and run stoppers, and thats all Foxy wants!
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
What about Christian Ballard?
He seems like he’d be a great pickup, and can play DT/DE. It seems like it’d be a pick of great value, especially in the 4th round. Do you guys think he’ll still be there when we’re on the clock in the 4th?
by jbbroncosfan27 on Apr 29, 2011 10:23 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Not sure if he is there
But no reason we don’t move up to get him, if we like him
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun" - Ash from Army of Darkness
"H.I., you're young and you got your health, what you want with a job?" - Evelle from Raising Arizona
"It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes." - Agent Rogersz from Repoman
Ballard has character issues, but maybe not a bad idea to consider him if available...
Kiper (I know he’s lame) has Ballard as one of the best players available for tomorrow, so I dunno if he falls 10 or 11 spots to the Broncos.
Christian Ballard
Would be a good value pick, but is best suited as a 4-3 DE maybe insurance for Ayers or Doom, however seems to weak/small to play DT. We need mass eaters, not highlight makers thats why we passed on Fairley and Dareus, to get a guy like jerrell powe, ian willams, or Adrain Taylor, (I Want All three) Id say in the 4th the 5th and the 7th. In the 6th a RB.
Sounds like Fox wanted a DT. I wonder what happened? Maybe Xanders or Elway took charge of the decision to draft Franklin
or Moore or even to trade down. Who knows really. This statement cracks me up though.
I think we have guys on our team now that can start. It is not like we have nobody (here)
Uh really coach? You guys got rid of our 2 starters and one is a FA. I think it’s safe to say anybody can start but can they start and be good? That’s really trying to make a horse out of horseshi*
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
Like a couple people mentioned earlier in the comments
I think they were interested in Jarvis Jenkins but they lost him when they traded down to pick up the picks in the 4th and 5th round. I believe the Rdskins took him a couple of spots before us.
The QB position is set!
by broncofaninIL on Apr 30, 2011 9:38 AM MDT up reply actions
Still not a fan of the Franklin pick
but I’m glad Fox admitted they wanted a DT. Hopefully they can find a solid guy in the 4th. I’m really excited for Irving, many people mentioned it and I made sure to note while watching Parcell’s special that he was the only LB for the 1st round on his board.
Good thing too is that we didn’t bite on any of the QB’s as well, I was kinda scared when Mallet was at our 3rd rounder.
If you reply to a comment/post/fanshot of mine, I will more likely then not respond to it, unless you come off like a d-bag.
HAPPY BUT SAD....huh?
Love the Von pick. Was ecstatic when Moore-Austin and Paea were all available when we had 2 picks in a row. I figured we’d take Moore and either of the 2 DT’s. I was disappointed. Then with Irving i was hoping for mason foster or Martez Wilson. However Irving is a beast and we will love him. Just in hindsight….how good would Von Miller-Rahim Moore-Marvin Austin- and Nate Irving sound??!!!! Our front 7 would be Beastly and Moore gives us a good ball hawk we haven’t had in over a decade. For the 4th round i like Sturdivant, Luke stocker, Tyler Sash, and Powe.
by Yankee4444 on Apr 30, 2011 12:41 AM MDT via mobile reply actions
adrian taylor
I think Adrian Taylor from OU would be a good late round pick or even ufa. It would all depend on his achillies.
Ok, so panthers fan here (and general advocate of Fox; I think he's taking way more crap than he deserves)
I was expecting you guys to take a DT with at least one of those picks, but you guys snatched up some quality players regardless (Moore especially); If you have any concerns about Miller transitioning to a 4-3, fear not….Fox KNOWS how to develop a LB (which I’m assuming is what they mainly want to do with him), so I have little doubt that he’ll become a beast (him and Ayers could be deadly together).
Also, don’t let last year’s carolina offense fool ya; Fox typically goes fairly balanced with his run to pass ratio…I don’t blame him for having no faith in our passing offense last year lol, and just because we’ve been a good running team in the past, doesn’t mean that Fox has some aversion to passing the ball (Jake used to light it up with Smitty and Moose)!
Nobody fucks with the Jesus! -Big Lebowski
I can see some logic in this draft mentality
But I find it interesting the comments that are being made, they sound exactly like the ones from Shanny’s and McD’s draft. “Rome wasn’t built in a day” “He’ll have 2-3 years to build up” “we can’t rush the change in defensive scheme’s” If Fox doesn’t have at least a .500 record by 2012, I doubt he’ll be here in 2013. I hope, somehow, that fans change their mentality, but if Fox can’t win some games, fans will turn, even if they say they won’t, they will turn.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.

by 





































