And now... The most controversial post of the off-season

I will start this off with full disclosure; I was and remain a big Josh McDaniels fan.
Sorry.
I come from the film world, in the film world you have producers and directors. There are very few directors who are given final cut on a film; final cut is normally reserved for the producers and this is the reason why the producers are the people that receive the Best Picture Award at the Academy Awards.
Josh McDaniels was given final cut as a rookie (a la Orson Welles). A rookie coach given the keys to a franchise (a la Welles' Citizen Kane)? Who does that!? McDaniels went 6-0 (Welles made one of the greatest films of all time), faltered (Welles' film didn't get released due to pressure on the studio) and left the season literally breaking even (Kane was released two years later, did nothing). Who did Pat Bowlen think McDaniels was anyway? Orson Welles?
The list of McDaniels rookie mistakes reads like a Who's Who of current NFL standouts: Jay Cutler, Brandon Marshall, Peyton Hillis and even Alphonso Smith (who he traded a first round draft pick for and unloaded a season later). Let's not even get into what happened between McDaniels and Mike Nolan, because Nolan was courted immediately by another "director" who has an incredible eye for talent-- Bill Parcells.
Lonie Paxton? $5.2-million? Oh, is it too soon to mention Paxton?
Every single move McDaniels made has been criticized ad nauseum by fans of the Denver Broncos.
Except one:
Tim Tebow.
I have nothing against the young man, he is flat out fun to watch. I could care less about his mechanics, I love to watch him run, I even craved a quarterback like Tebow in a Denver uniform since the first time I had the pleasure of watching Michael Vick play.
However, seriously... Fans? How is it that every single thing that McDaniels did was wrong yet when the first round draft pick of Tebow comes up there are such obvious blinders on?
Was McDaniels an idiot? Was he a giant asterisk on the Broncos all time record, an absolute failure, or a martyr sent to die for the sins of a regime gone power and control drunk? If Brian Xanders is worth his weight now, then what the heck was wrong with him three years ago?
I'll say it right now, I don't see anything wrong with Kyle Orton, if this were baseball and Orton were a pitcher he'd be a winner, one of the better pitchers in the league, Tebow is merely relief and not even a successful one yet. He's simple a new guy with an interesting screw-ball.
Orton can only throw curve-ball strikes for so long, eventually the defense has got to step up. Runs have to be scored; a clock manager is only as good as the team that's preventing the other team from scoring. There is nothing wrong with a clock manager in football. In fact, that's exactly who John Elway has hired: A clock manager, John Fox's defense will manage to get Orton the ball back and Orton will manage the clock long enough to keep the other team from getting the ball back.
See how that works?
Tebow is nothing more than yet another mistake that McDaniels made and if he's not then let McDaniels forever be known as the genius who was just simply too ahead of his time. Let us replay the tape of Cutler sulking on the sideline while his team lost in the playoffs; while Marshall dropped yet another ball or caused his team to lose 15 more yards on an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty; Hillis going down with yet another groin injury; or Smith getting beat consistently by the man he is covering on national television on Thanksgiving.
Let Richard Quinn be the greatest third tackle in the history of the NFL and Knowshon Moreno run for 2,000 yards and Robert Ayers sack a quarterback ten times in a season... Darcel McBath become the next Brian Dawkins, Perrish Cox, the next Champ Bailey... Let it all happen, because if it doesn't then my dear friends there is no reason at all to feel like McDaniels was correct in drafting Tebow.
Because two spots before he chose Tebow McDaniels felt that Demaryius Thomas was the best choice available. With off-season injuries the Broncos may have to go until 2012 before they find out that Thomas was a bust. All things considered Broncos fans is McDaniels still the man that you want to put all of your trust into?
Let me as always play devil's advocate and say that McDaniels was undeniably on with the picks in the rest of the 2010 draft Zane Beadles, J.D. Walton, Eric Decker and Syd'quan Thompson were all worth their weight in draft gold. McDaniels also had the foresight to bring in undrafted rookie Cassius Vaughn, whom is one of Denver's (if not the NFL's) youngest premiere special team players.
Allow me to reintroduce myself my name is Ian and Tebow is a backup for now; a player in need of much training; training that McDaniels (one of the best quarterback coaches in the NFL) could have provided. Now Tebow is at the mercy of Elway and I don't know what Elway and co. can do with him, I do know what Elway is capable of doing with him, but I simply cannot see it happening in 2011, but by 2012, who knows?
Citizen Kane went on to be regarded as one of the greatest films ever made, Welles went on to do one more picture of acclaim and ping-ponged into oblivion.
Yet I can't say Josh McDaniels was ahead of his time, because I fear that his time may never come...
275 comments
|
14 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Blasphemy
You’ve got guts I’ll give you that. I feel sorry for you because you are bound to have to go into hiding. Seriouly I agree with alot of what you said but Mcdaniels couldn’t close the deal. When he fired Nolan that bothered me. Your post made me think and I like that. Thank you. Can we call you Hollywood?
My fear exactly
You may call me whatever you like as long as it’s not Shirley.
Thank you for reading and I agree the Mike Nolan thing was the point where I started to think the kool-aid was getting stale.
Dude, what's your point?
You loved McD, but all his decisions sucked, therefore Tebow sucks? Great logic. And the whole baseball analogy… C’mon man…!
by Merlin Scott on Jun 13, 2011 5:27 PM MDT up reply actions
Nolan was fired?
I thought he left on his own. It was so long ago I can’t remember.
They agreed to pursue
their interests separately, my impression was that Nolan found himself a better deal and got out. McD I am sure "fired’ him
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
oh and nolan wasnt fired, it was a mutual agreement that nolan leave. big difference.
by broncs27 on Jun 14, 2011 7:36 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions
hm...
well written article but i’m not sure i get the point. is mcD an all or nothing proposition? it’s a bit like the folks who persistently rip on shanahan’s drafting (in)abilities but seem to have forgotten the winning percentage and the superbowls. there’s good and bad in any coach and any organization. heck, even if mcD is the total proverbial sightless squirrel, he had to have found a nut here and there just by sheer dumb luck. i do agree that tebow hasn’t done anything yet but he’s shown me enough to at least allow me to hope. and as a charter member of the non-mcD fan club, i’ll also be the first to give credit to the man if guys like tebow, thomas and ayers pan out, without ever feeling remorse that he’s gone.
I'm not sugarcoating this.
With McD
I give concerns, not advice, my concerns really fall more in the ‘Which is/was he’ category. Is Tebow just the left-overs of a planned profound meal that we all kind of just got stuck with the bill after everyone else gorged themselves??
The point is
There are too many people contradicting that McD was the worst thing in Denver history, but Tebow is the best. Either McD knew what he was doing or he didn’t.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
by KaptainKirk on Jun 13, 2011 10:46 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Either McD knew what he was doing or he didn’t.
that’s what i don’t get. why does it have to be black or white? i mean, you don’t hear a lot of people rave about matt millen as a GM because he drafted shaun rogers and calvin johnson.
I'm not sugarcoating this.
by oxmouth on Jun 13, 2011 11:05 AM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Wrong
Sorry, but there is no truth to the “McD either knew what he was doing or he didn’t” line of thought, which is why this post, although well-conceived and written, doesn’t hold up. I think even the most jaded McD detractors among us (myself included) would admit that he has an innovative mind when it comes to passing the football. The running game, not so much. But right there is an example of how he both knew what he was doing and didn’t.
When it comes to the draft and free agency, it’s clear that McD made series of blunders that set this team back years. Ian cataloged a number of them here. But as with his coaching strengths, McD’s ability to evaluate offensive skill players in the passing game (QBs and WRs) has so far proved to be pretty impressive. He brought in Brandon Lloyd and Jabar Gaffney, drafted DT and Eric Decker and traded for Kyle Orton. I’m no Orton apologist, but I will say that he has the ability to start in this league. I’d rather have him than Jason Campbell, for example.
It’s entirely possible that McD was too enamored of Tebow’s character and his own ability to coach him up into the QB, not just the football player, that he would need to be to succeed in McD’s system. But just because McD failed in many other ways doesn’t mean that he got this one wrong. As I’ve said, QB play was the one facet of the game that McD seemed to understand most innately and deeply. Maybe he was visionary enough, in this one case, to outsmart everyone else, even if his ability to evaluate personnel at every other position was seriously flawed.
It’s still to early to say if McD got this one right. Maybe he didn’t. But to say that he missed on Tebow because he missed on McBath, or Know, or whoever, isn’t a cogent argument.
Of course, there’s another reason that Tebow could succeed while McD’s other players fall: Maybe McD just got lucky. It does happen, even to failed boy geniuses.
by EddieRoyalwithCheese on Jun 13, 2011 11:15 AM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
I also don't think a guy has to be ALL right or ALL wrong.
Though I sincerely hope EFX doesn’t go all in with Orton.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
Xanders may only have one year so I think his vote will be for Tebow. Unless Brain figures out a way to take credit away from McD for Tim’s selection in the same manner Brian gets credit for watching to draft Clay Matthews over Ayers.
The Lockout bores me.
KK, you know I love you, but you have a massive slant against Tebow...no matter what the kid does, and I am not sure why?
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
This is the same Kirk that waited hours in line for his autograph on Tebow's book....
Maybe he just sees the good and the bad – and being careful not to be labeled a lover or hater. That is the sad part of Tebow discussions…people can’t see middle ground. Either the other person is a Teboner homer or an Orton lover or Tebow hater…blah blah blah.
I am quite in the middle, but there is no middle so some people perceive me as walking around with a perpetual Teboner simply because I hammered Orton for his failings last year and got hyped when Tebow provided that brief spark at the end.
I’ve given up reasoning with people.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
No need to reason man....Tebow is the most polarizing figure ever...I was blowing up when we drafted him, and supported Orton for lots...fair call Tim...I would never mean to offend KK.....hes a good man.
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
Let's just say
I have the patience to wait for him to develop. Yes I’ve been a nit picker regarding him, but in all fairness, it is mostly because of the masses gushing over him. IMO, too many are being too emotional about him starting immediately. For me it doesn’t matter who starts for the Broncos, but it would be for the best if Timmy earns it. I’m positive that it will turn into a when. I can’t wait to see him in Training Camp and compare results in his progress.
After meeting him, I really do understand why the gushers gush.
Please keep in mind that I haven’t been skeptical that he would succeed, just about when he’s ready to start.
Unrelated add on:
Also, even though I have thrown Cutler under the bus (for many reasons), I don’t think it’s fair for anyone to throw Orton there.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
I agree with that...I think Orton is a good fellow and hard worker, I just dont see him as a QB OUR franchise needs to build a team around....hes a constructive add on for a team with pieces in place.
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
I really wish we didn't sign Orton to that contract for this year.
I don’t think it’s fair for anyone to throw Orton there(under the bus).
Orton’s a good QB and man. To many fans are in a rush to get Tebow in as a starter. I will not feel bad if Orton is traded and we get a pick for him, but I do kind of think we should let him start one more year. Like Elway said, he just needs to learn to win.
A little nasty on defense would be nice.
He was a winner...but it was due to a great defense in Chicago...
He does not CARRY a team on a consistent basis. He would have been perfect for the bears NOW….as he has more play making ability thanks to McD and some weapons and consistent starting, but I saw no MASSIVE development.
As TD saud, I saw a team play above itself for Tebow, and not give in. Thats what a leader inspires I guess, and i just dont see the same effect when Orton is our QB.
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
True boydy.
The effort is twice as much for Tebow on offense and defense.
A little nasty on defense would be nice.
LMAO!
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
Sorry but that is way too simple minded.
Life is not black and white and no one can claim that every move made was bad just as it can’t be said that every move Shanny made was perfect. McD wasn’t ready for the power handed to him, but to claim that everything he did was wrong smacks of a blind hatred and quite frankly childish stupidity.
Like it or not Tebow gets credit for his college record. He gets credit for bringing a spark to a lifeless team. He also sells quite a bit of Merchandise and puts asses in the seats. at the end of the day, that makes a team profitable.
Attaching McD to all the players he drafted and hating them because of it is just absolutely ignorant and small minded. They are Bronco players. There was a time that meant something in Denver. Sadly I am watching a fanbase I used to brag about slowly begin to make Philly look supportive.
"The problem with quotes in internet signatures is 90% of them are made up -Ghandi"
For the Jarvis Moss
There was a Ryan Clady
by Warren Todd on Jun 13, 2011 5:03 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
Well written Ox???...this "thing" makes no sense what so ever....pointless, non sensical post...
1/ Premature to call Thomas a bust. i think he is going to be elite, and many others think this too.
2/ Jury out on Ayers but improving.
3/ Moreno improved through out the season, and played at an elite level against KC and Arizona for example, (His injuries worry me but not his talent).
4/ Perrish Cox shows a lot of promise, as does Thompson.
5/ McD is a great QB coach, but not a great evaluator? What sense does THAT make.
The only thing you are correct on is The Phonz.
Cutler is the most over rated QB in the NFL, Marshall nothing but a glorified possession WR and Hillis (as much as I like him) is a circus novelty as a rare white RB.
Absolutely senseless post!
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
An apology
You guys really don’t know me yet, but I am a bit sarcastic. I started the article by saying that I am a McDaniels fan, I think most of his draft picks were spot-on. I think most of his decisions were very well made as well. I also believe that he was right in getting rid of Cutler, even correct in drafting Tebow.
This is what I love and yearned for when I joined the MHR community, a lot of opinions and a lot of football intelligence.
I don’t think that McD deserves the hate that he has received on this board, in the Broncos nation and I really see him deserving some credit if/when the Broncos turn it around. I feel as if the blame lays in the hands of ownership/management for giving him too much power.
I 100% agree with that Ian....Bowlen is one of the MAJOR reasons we went to crap, and the absentee management of him and Joe Ellis.
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
Blame lies with both. Management and ownership failed in giving McD limits to his power. McD failed to take a so-so team and improve it. In fact, McD took a so-so team and turned it into one of the very worst in the NFL. He doesn’t deserve much love for that. Bowlen could have hired a ton of coaches that performed better than McD did in his two seasons.
The last few years have been very disappointing as a Bronco fan, but McD was like a 1st round bust at coach. He came in with the hype, but failed miserably to live up to his supposed immense talent. That is not entirely the fault of ownership.
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 13, 2011 7:18 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
I did catch that,
however, sarcasm is an art not known to most on here. It also is not very easily detected online.
A little nasty on defense would be nice.
It’s also the lowest form of humor, so that is another reason you don’t see it much at MHR. Sarcasm doesn’t take much talent or creativity.
The Lockout bores me.
I disagree McG.
Sarcasm, IMO, is meant to fool and takes a lot of talent to pull it off correctly.
A little nasty on defense would be nice.
disagree, if you fool with sarcasm then you've either failed to do it correctly or the listener has failed to catch it.
The point of sarcasm is to have the appearance of fooling but while still allowing the listener to know your true intentions. That is why it is a fail if you have to tell your listener that you were being sarcastic. It should be known from tone. It doesn’t work well online as you have to clarify sarcasm 99% of the time since there is no tone involved.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 12:14 PM MDT up reply actions
That's why I try to use italics
Just kidding
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
by KaptainKirk on Jun 16, 2011 12:47 PM MDT up reply actions
lol, the world needs to adopt a standard for written sarcasm.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions
Funny that you compare McDaniels to a director.
Considering it was his “film work” of the 49ers that played a crucial role in getting him axed.
www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com
by Triston27 on Jun 13, 2011 10:35 AM MDT reply actions 6 recs
Lol
you get a Rec for your wit Triston
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
by KaptainKirk on Jun 13, 2011 10:43 AM MDT up reply actions
It's funny two
because there is someone (actually several some ones, possibly thousands of some ones) somewhere in the wide world reading that comment with steam just blowing out of his ears, red eyes bulging out of their sockets, thick blue vain running down his forehead, pounding on his keyboard screaming (think loud, angry Fred Flinstone Voice)
“Josh McDaniels did not order the taping, he had nothing to do with the taping and was only reprimanded for not reporting the incident immediately”!! Cat running, dog hiding, kids crying, wife drinking.
I still think that Josh McDaniels involvement is debatable and the truth may never be known. I guess there is a slight chance that Scarnecchia is simply a Pathological Voyeur. There is that possibility and……oh boy There goes Fred again!
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 13, 2011 1:56 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
WILMA!!!
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
That's Funny Three Kap
I was always more of a Betty Fan.
BTW don’t Google Betty Rubble images at work…ahhhem…you never know where you might end up. I wouldn’t want anyone to lose a job over a cartoon image and end up so broke that folks start calling you Mr. Rubble…..

by KoloradoKaos on Jun 13, 2011 2:33 PM MDT up reply actions
True, there are plenty that would defend McDaniels, but if pushed hard enough, I'm sure we'd hear the truth. And it might go like this:

Pat Bowlen: Coach McDaniels, did you order the video taping?
Roger Goodell: You don’t have to answer that question!
Josh McDaniels: I’ll answer the question!
Josh McDaniels: You want answers?
Pat Bowlen: I think I’m entitled.
Josh McDaniels: You want answers?
Pat Bowlen: I want the truth!
Josh McDaniels: You can’t handle the truth!
[pauses]
Josh McDaniels: Son, we live in a world that plays football, and that football has to be played by men with pads. Who’s gonna do it? You? You, Brian Xanders? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Steve Scarnecchia, and you curse the Broncos. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That this video taping, while tragic, probably wins games. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, wins games. You don’t want the truth because deep down in places you don’t talk about at parties, you want me with that video camera, you need me with that video camera. We use words like blitz, audible, and hot route. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent playing for something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very wins that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a helmet, and block Patrick Willis. Either way, I don’t give a damn what you think you are entitled to.
Pat Bowlen: Did you order the video taping?
Josh McDaniels: I did the job I…
Pat Bowlen: Did you order the video taping?
Josh McDaniels: You’re Goddamn right I did!
www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com
by Triston27 on Jun 13, 2011 2:52 PM MDT up reply actions 8 recs
?
Did you just have McD say “son” to Pat Bowlen?? I know you’re paraphrasing movie but maybe switch that out to granpa or something…
by relocated bronco in NC on Jun 13, 2011 3:00 PM MDT up reply actions
Thought about that after posting.
But McD is just cocky enough to do it.
www.oreadboomkings.fantake.com
That's Funny, I was thinking about "Johnny and Maverick"
while writing the post too. Well done.
Cocky, dumb, disrespectful, young, immature….etc, etc
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 14, 2011 8:41 AM MDT up reply actions
Uh...what are these "Wins" that you talk about?
I don’t remember many of those.
The movie must fall
in the “Fiction” or “Fantasy” classifications. Could also be labeled a “Drama”, “Horror” or “Comedy”.
Josh McDaniels supporter (in high pitched whiney voice, think Gilbert Gottfried )
They started out 6 and 0…. Did you ever notice that his name is Gott-Fried? Kind of like Pat Bowlen for hiring Josh McDaniels and allowing him to run amuck at Dove Valley.
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 14, 2011 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions
Fascinating article
Honestly, very well written. Even if Tebow succeeds, and as a Bronco fan I certainly hope he does, I still believe McD’s legacy in Denver will be one of incredible failure and humiliation. From 6-0 to the worst season and a half in franchise history. Covering up Spygate II. And all of the horribly blown draft choices and player acquisitions.
He has been annointed a genius by many due to his success mostly as a QB coach in New England. It will be interesting to see if he ever achieves real success on his own away from Belicheat and Tom Brady.
We see a wonderful sun-soaked city nestled at the foot of the Rocky Mountains. Enos sees nickels and dimes.
by Bob in Boulder on Jun 13, 2011 10:48 AM MDT reply actions
We WANT tebow to be a stud
who really knows what he’ll be. Trading that much draft capital for a project player (truth hurts!) was certainly bold, but also reckless give all of the other obvious holes. For his bet to payoff, Tebow, IMO, will need to develop into a “plus” QB and sustain it for a number of years. We don’t even know if he’d ready to start yet, muck less lead us out of the basement.
But to your point, if Tebow does end up to be The Second Coming (hee hee), then I will be the first the say “Thanks” to McD, but there is no way that “thanks” would turn into “I miss you”.
No matter how Tebow turns out, I DO NOT want to ever see McD part 2!
by Elway's Ghost on Jun 13, 2011 10:57 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Tebow will pay off you just watch
No save ammunition all bullets in gun now- Bruce Campbell
Stand up straight a man looks more confident when he is erect- Taj
GO BRONCOS
That picture needs a Caption
As evil Chucky dares Josh to trade a valuable draft pick to his mentor, McDaniels laughs as Bill Belichick uses the force to dump a worthless Laurence Maroney off on his young Paduwan.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
by KaptainKirk on Jun 13, 2011 10:57 AM MDT reply actions 3 recs
Priceless Kap'n!
A pessimist sees the difficulties in every opportunity.
An optimist sees the opportunities in every difficulty.
- Winston Churchill
First (and only, in our lifetimes) team to three consecutive SB wins (perhaps and then some)!!!! ( =
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Jun 13, 2011 12:28 PM MDT up reply actions
Since we're talking baseball
Orton is Ted Lilly. Lilly was capable of being a very good starting pitcher for the Cubs, but no matter how good he was (or is now), he always needed way too much run support. For whatever reason, no matter how dominant the Cubs were offensively, it was always Lilly who failed on the other end, and mo matter how good he pitched, the team was hardly ever around to rally around him and give him run support. I don’t know if that’s still the case with him in LA, but that’s how it has ALWAYS been for Orton, no matter where he’s gone.
Orton is capable of putting up great numbers, but no matter how good a game he has, the Broncos’ defense doesn’t play well enough or the running game isn’t good enough. No matter how good the running game or defense is, Orton’s game is not up to par. Orton can put up the numbers, but he’s not a star quarterback and he doesn’t have star quality.
Tim Tebow does, regardless of how irrational anyone thinks it is. Whether or not you believe Tebow has the coaching, mechanics, etc., etc., he owns a quality that is rare to professional athletes—forget just NFL players. Tebow has an innate ability to get first downs and score points. THAT is what the Broncos need above anything else, which includes at the moment: A pocket passer, a robot quarterback with flawless mechanics, et al. The Broncos need someone who can put them not just in position to win, but push them to the winner’s circle.
Follow me on Twitter: @SayreBedinger
by Sayre Bedinger on Jun 13, 2011 11:06 AM MDT reply actions 3 recs
I really don’t get how pitchers are supposed to be QBs? Pitchers play defense and QBs play offense.
If anything, your QB would compare to the #4 clean-up hitter. The guy MOST responsible to put points (runs) on the board.
As a #4 hitter, Orton gets a lot of walks, but he doesn’t hit enough HRs or drive in enough RBIs. Kyle would only correlate into a quasi-dangerous hitter a team with the worst starting rotation of pitchers in the NFL (the Broncos 2010 defense).
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM MDT up reply actions 3 recs
Any comparison is moot, but int he spirit of the article he stuck with baseball.
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
So that would make Orton Like this years version of Aramis Ramirez?
"The problem with quotes in internet signatures is 90% of them are made up -Ghandi"
This is not all that interesting of a read nor is it clever in its use of metaphor.
First off, Orton is not a pitcher! He is a QB and a QB that has not performed well in terms of getting his team into the end zone. Denver’s D can’t help him there. Scoring is the job of the offense. Pitchers are essentially defenders and in the AL, they don’t even bat so they can’t contribute a damn thing to the team’s run production. Comparing Orton to a pitcher makes very little sense.
One of Orton’s fatal flaws that doesn’t get enough discussion is that he takes several sacks or is forced to throw the ball away in circumstances that 30 or so other starting NFL QBs could avoid simply by using their feet. As the least athletic starting QB in the NFL, Orton really hurts Denver here. The lame subpar QBs turned analysts like Steve Berline will praise Orton endlessly for throwing the ball away instead of taking a sack or throwing an INT, but all Kyle is really doing is wasting a lot of downs. It doesn’t take a hero to throw the ball away, it’s also not worth $8.8MM a year. Lots of QBs can throw the ball away, but most can make more plays with Orton with their feet so that they don’t need to waste so many plays where pass protection isn’t perfect.
I don’t hate Orton. Far from it. He is a great egg that can put up good passing stats in terms of yards and completion %. Hard worker, good teammate and professional to the core. But as we’ve seen in the last two years, that isn’t good enough. Not even close. His offense has ranked in the bottom half of the NFL in points scored. It wasn’t until Tebow showed up until Denver started to consistently score in the 20 points per game. In fact, with Tebow as the starting QB, we scored 25 points per game. That is the job of the offense. They don’t pitch, they hit. Tebow is a better hitter than Orton.
Some of you guys can get all excited about Orton’s 476 yard passing games when Denver scores all of 13 points in a home blowout loss. I’m more into Tebow’s 28 point games when Denver is in a dogfight for the victory.
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 13, 2011 11:17 AM MDT reply actions 12 recs
It’s all about the red zone. Tebow provides the running / scramble threat that Orton cannot. With a subpar running game to start with, the Broncos were a one-dimensional pass-first team in the red-zone last year. Tebow provides that extra dimension. However, the being efficient over the other 80 yards of the field is where Tebow needs to take a big leap in order to be a stud QB in 2011.
Ask any NFL GM and they’d take a QB that stars in the red-zone over a QB that stars between the 20s.
A good defense, running game and STs can solve the latter. QBs earn their money in the red zone. As such, Orton is overpaid.
Tebow has a long way to go before he is a stud QB. But so does Orton and that is what his biggest supporters won’t admit. Tebow, as a young 23 year old player with very little experience, has far more untapped upside than Kyle.
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 13, 2011 11:40 AM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
100% agree
No save ammunition all bullets in gun now- Bruce Campbell
Stand up straight a man looks more confident when he is erect- Taj
GO BRONCOS
Where was he not successful in his 3 games...go look at Lloyds production in last 3 games and say he suffered not having Orton...he did not...averaged around 100 yards per game!
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
by boydy2669 on Jun 13, 2011 5:48 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Just out of curiosity
I’ve been trying to stay out of the Orton/Tebow debate because I can see arguments for/against both of them. I do have to raise a question about this:
One of Orton’s fatal flaws that doesn’t get enough discussion is that he takes several sacks or is forced to throw the ball away in circumstances that 30 or so other starting NFL QBs could avoid simply by using their feet. As the least athletic starting QB in the NFL, Orton really hurts Denver here.
I’m curious what criteria is being used to define Orton as “the least athletic starting QB.”
Is it sacks? Orton had 34 in 2010. 6 other QBs had as many or more — including the supposedly more mobile Jay Cutler and Donovan McNabb. Is it rushing yards? Orton ranked 20th among NFL QBs in rushing yards in 2010, and one of the 19 ahead of him was his own teammate, Tebow. Is it simply the “eye-test”?
I would agree that Orton is not the most mobile of QBs and struggles when the play breaks down. Yet, I would also suggest that that same description most likely fits the majority of NFL starters.
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jun 13, 2011 1:15 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
It’s not necessary sacks or throwaways, but I’d favor the throwaways. People love to fawn on Orton for his ability to throw the ball away instead of throwing a dangerous pass.
But the problem I have is that Orton has to throw the ball away far too often because he doesn’t have the foot speed to avoid a rusher than 31 other starting QBs could. Kyle Orton has a lot of throw aways because he can’t make a play most other QBs could. He is like Grease in that regard, but with a much better clock in his head.
Just watch the man play. If you think he is not one of the least mobile starting QBs in the NFL. I ask that you name 5 (hell try 2) with less mobility.
The Lockout bores me.
thanks for your perspective
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jun 13, 2011 4:02 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
I’m serious. I’d like you to try to name 2 to 5 starting QBs with less mobility than Orton.
I just went thru the NFC and came up with Arizona only because they don’t have a QB. Maybe Kyle is more athletic than Hasselback in Seattle. No one else jumps out in the NFC.
In the AFC, maybe he is a better athlete than Colt McCoy or Matt Cassel, but I’m grasping there as well. I bet every one of those guys is quicker and faster than Kyle. Most of them have stronger low bodies and balance as well.
If you watch the sacks Kyle takes, some are simply awful, but several of the throwaways are just as wasteful.
The Lockout bores me.
There you go again
You overstate your point.
KO has made fantastic plays out of broken plays. If he can get outside.
Our runners had the same problem so you blaming Orton’s mobility is not entirely true.
The Broncos pocket lasted micro seconds and run lanes were non existant.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Tebow is such a great athlete that it’s unfair to compare Orton’s mobility shortcomings to Tim’s excellence here. Most QBs are not as fast, quick and strong as Tebow. But with the same crappy blocking, running scheme and rookie O-linemen, Tim was making all kinds of plays with his feet where Orton took sacks or threw the ball away.
But just name me three starting QBs that appear less mobile than Orton. Just three. I highly doubt you can do it. I just tried and failed. When I saw Orton is the least mobile of all 32 starting NFL QBs, I’m being dead serious. And it’s a big problem. A problem that has lead to 3 injuries in two seasons for Kyle as well as general ineffectiveness in the red zone and on 4th downs.
The Lockout bores me.
I don't think I could
But ask me to name three to five QB’s I would rather NOT have over Orton and they come rollling off the tongue. Orton has some serious shortcomings but is better than Jason Campbell for one. I am concerned about him being injury prone as well.
His ability to make a quick read and see defenses would be a great asset behind a good line. That is not your argument and my only point is that you make him out as worse than I think he is.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Orton's problem is
once he is behind a sucky offensive line, his mobility hurts him. If the Broncos could have pass protected a tad bit better last year, I’m sure he would have torn it up. His TD/INT ratio is outstanding but that does him little good when he has to keep picking himself up. Dan Marino rarely got sacked with the Dolphins, igualmente for Peyton with the Colts, etc.
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 5:14 PM MDT up reply actions
He is also a 1st or 2nd read QB with above average pocket presence...so that his pocket presence dpes not make up for his lack of agility like Brady or Manning.
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
My point has always been very clear. that Orton is the least athletic starting QB in the NFL and it has hurt Denver on many occasions.
I never said he was the worst starting QB. He is Top 20 IMO and I’d take him all day long over guys like Cassel, Garrard, Grossman, Anderson, Henne and Alex Smith.
But that still doesn’t excuse the fact that Kyle’s lack of mobility is a very big problem. Teams have figured that out and attack him accordingly. McD was foolish to draft 2 rookie linemen knowing his nonathletic QB would be running for his life, but since McD screwed up our blocking schemes so badly, we had to get rid of Weigmann and Hamilton because they were such bad fits under Barone.
The Lockout bores me.
Campbell had a better record last year than Orton. I'd Take him anyday.
"The problem with quotes in internet signatures is 90% of them are made up -Ghandi"
by Heeler on Jun 13, 2011 9:55 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
30 Teams
had better records. Campbell is not better, nor are many of those QB on teams with better records.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Campbell has more career yards, higher YPA and higher career QB Rating.
"The problem with quotes in internet signatures is 90% of them are made up -Ghandi"
OK, lets go thru them:
AFC West:
- Rivers – About the same, but Rivers is WAY better in pocket.
- Cassell – Very mobile.
- Campbell – More mobile.
AFC East:
- Sanchez – More athletic.
- Brady – Better in pocket.
- Fitzpatrick – More mobile.
- Henne – More mobile.
AFC North:
- Flacco – More mobile.
- Roethlisberger – More mobile.
- McCoy – More mobile.
- Palmer – Slightly more mobile but more pocket presence.
AFC South:
- Manning – About the same but Manning has more pocket presence.
- Garrard – More athletic.
- Schaub – Slightly more athletic but more pocket presence.
- Collins – Equal or less athletic.
NFC West:
- Bradford – More athletic.
- Anderson/ Skelton – Call it a wash
- Hasselback – More athletic.
- Smith – More athletic.
NFC East:
- Romo – More athletic.
- McNabb – More athletic.
- Vick – More athletic.
- Manning – A wash.
NFC South:
- Clausen – More athletic.
- Freeman – More athletic
- Ryan – More athletic.
- Brees – More athletic.
NFC North:
- Cutler – More athletic
- Rodgers – More athletic
- Favre – More athletic.
- Stafford/ Hill – More athletic.
So when you look at this, Orton is equal with about as ATHLETIC as Rivers, the Manning boys, Tom Brady and either QB from Arizona.
BUT…..the guys listed with him have better pocket presence (apart from the ARI QB’s). So here is the problem with Orton…he has better pocket presence than most of the mobile QB’s above, but is nowhere near the same league as the pure pocket passes who run like molasses. So, we have a guy who has LIMITED mobility, not elite pocket presence and who is a QB who throws to his 1st or 2nd read on many occasions (as is McD’s design).
Draw your own conclusions.
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
I considered Locker the QB in Tennessee. Eli is more athletic than Orton.
Just look at the 2011 NFL draft. Newton goes #1. He is uber athletic. Locker goes #8, again super athletic. Gabbert goes #10 and that dude is a great athlete. Ponder goes #12 and he is a great athlete. 49ers trade up for Kilpatrick, another super athletic QB. Dalton moves pretty well. The 1st nonathletic QB gets taken by the Pats in round 3 (Ryan Mallet) after falling well down the board.
This league is moving away from the Orton and Mallet types that don’t move well. I’m not a GM, but I can see a clear trend so there must be a reason for this.
BTW – Orton is vastly better than Mallet. The only point of comparison is their lead feet.
The Lockout bores me.
boydy
it might be helpful if you also breakdown the talent level both offensively and defensively of each of the above teams. Not to mention the state of the organization, it’s players, coaches and fans at the time. Touch on the Morale of the organization too while you’re at it. All of these things factor into winning games in the ultimate team sport.
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 14, 2011 9:14 AM MDT up reply actions
Hockey is the ultimate team sport. this isn’t even debatable. The next time you see a hockey player point to the back of his jersey like Kenny Peterson or Darren Sproles will be the first time you see that.
Subsequently, that hockey player would get punched several times in the face and thrown to the ice.
The Lockout bores me.
It would have been debatable
in NPL aka MFL about 50 years ago. The MFL before FA, before agents, before hood rats, before new stadiums, high ticket prices…etc..etc.
I have a lot of respect for Hockey players, far more than any other sport at this time. They are by far the most underrated athletes of the big four. Most folks can’t walk on ice let alone skate. The sport is truly a combination of the other three of the big four.
Hockey combines the toughness of American Football, speed and finesses of the MBA and hand eye coordination of the MLB. I could go on because there really is so much to the sport of Hockey but you catch my drift.
I would still say that Football is the ultimate team sport because unlike the MBA and Hockey it is very difficult if not impossible for one player to take over the game (score more precisely). It’s fairly common for MBA and Hockey players to go the length and score unassisted. It is nearly impossible for a player to score unassisted in the MFL because not many Centers have that kind of athleticism.
I do believe that Hockey teams are comprised of the most unselfish team mates of the big four and quite frankly I would rather watch Hockey because of that. I’m not sure how much longer I can stomach the MFL and lost interest in the MBA a long time ago.
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 14, 2011 12:17 PM MDT up reply actions
Good points KK2 and McG...I played ice hockey in Australia...it is up there with rugby as the best team sport for sure.
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
Ice hockey in Australia?
A couple guys from the bar are (were) rugby players. They’re friggin nuts but great guys and w/o all the attitude of MBA and MFL players. And to play that sport without pads….they have my respect for sure.
How does the ol’saying go?
Soccer is a gentleman’s sport played by hooligans and
Rugby is a hooligans sport played by gentlemen?
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 16, 2011 9:25 AM MDT up reply actions
It was in reply to McG's call on Kyle Orton's athleticism....but I agree...
Its no coincidence that the best organizations are those with a plan, a mentor program and stability in coaching….see the Steelers for example.
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
Kyles problem is....
He can’t reset his feet or throw of his back foot worth a damn. It’s a shame because he is a good pocket passer. I know everyone says you shouldn’t throw off balance but look at the throw Tebow made to Loyld against Houston…that is what wins ball games. Kyle will never be able to do that. Tebow will make everyone believers, quickly.
by northoftheborder on Jun 13, 2011 4:24 PM MDT up reply actions
Jake Plummer
was a master at that, Cutler sucks at it so thank goodness he’s gone
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 5:15 PM MDT up reply actions
I would say Orton
can do that, set and throw. I know that 50+ yard TD throw at the end of the first half was a broken play where he broke to the right, threw facing the crowd ( across his body), and I can’t think of what game it was….. But he has shown when healthy he can make some pretty good plays.
Heck, I’ve seen Donovan McNabb take some pretty sad sacks and even worse escape to throw an int. Not sure which is more frustrating. The QB that lays down or the one that tries and does not succeed.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
I know which is more frustrating the laying down QB
but Im the kinda guy that likes recklessness rather than safety
No save ammunition all bullets in gun now- Bruce Campbell
Stand up straight a man looks more confident when he is erect- Taj
GO BRONCOS
There you go again McG...letting common sense and facts get in the way of a great argument! rec'd! Seriously, does anyone out there think Orton can lead us to the promised land? Anyone? Bueller, Bueller.....
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
No way caan Orton lead us anywhere
No save ammunition all bullets in gun now- Bruce Campbell
Stand up straight a man looks more confident when he is erect- Taj
GO BRONCOS
I'm a fan of Tebow and want him to start but...
I think Orton does have the ability to win in this league.
"It is our attitude at the beginning of a difficult task which, more than anything else, will affect its successful outcome." - William James
by FloridaFan62 on Jun 14, 2011 7:24 AM MDT up reply actions
sure Orton can win in this league
he won 3 games last season
No save ammunition all bullets in gun now- Bruce Campbell
Stand up straight a man looks more confident when he is erect- Taj
GO BRONCOS
See there, I told ya so! :-P
"It is our attitude at the beginning of a difficult task which, more than anything else, will affect its successful outcome." - William James
by FloridaFan62 on Jun 15, 2011 11:52 AM MDT up reply actions
What is and what will never be
First let me say that I’m sure you’ll probably achieve your goal of generating a controversial post simply by mentioning Tebow. You’ll also stir things up by simply listing McD’s mistakes as many here do not believe that trading Cutler and Marshall were mistakes when you consider their current status and what was received in return. However the reality (what will never be) of the McD fiasco is that we’ll never really know if his mad scientist approach to the game would have produced a winning team or not. By most NFL experts analysis it takes anywhere from 2 to 4 years to determine if a player will boom or bust in the NFL and there’s just too many examples of players that develop in that span to deny the logic. I think we all (most anyway) agree that Mcd needed to go and hope that he never comes back, however his legacy of players traded and acquired will never be fully realized since they were drafted with his schematic in mind.
Now, on to the “what is” part of the equation. IMO the biggest error in your post is assuming that Thomas will be a bust. Pre-injury most people who observed Thomas in TC and pre-season raved about his combination of speed and skill. The only question in my mind is whether he will fully recover from his injury and we’re a long way from determining that. Your statements regarding Tebow are convoluted. On one hand you say that you always wanted a player like Tebow and then you flip and say that he’s merely relief and that if Ayers, Moreno, Mcbath and Cox don’t turn out to be superstars there’s no reason to believe that Mcdaniels was correct in drafting Tebow as if it’s an all or nothing equation. The NFL draft is not all or nothing, every year even the best teams miss on some and hit on others.
I’m afraid you may fall well short of the “Most highly controversial post of the offseason” but considering the lack of much else to read and talk about it was an interesting read, thanks.
"as in football so in life"
I’d like to think of myself as McD’s biggest critic, but even I think the Cutler and Marshall trades were wins for Denver (landslide wins to be honest).
Sure, we pretty much wasted all that draft bounty because McD was so damn awful on draft day (and Xanders had a brain fart on the Orlando Franklin pick), but Denver needs Cutler and Marshall on their payroll as bad as they need McD on the sidelines. Good riddance to all three.
The Lockout bores me.
controversial postings
I am pretty sure I picked up the most controversial post of the year when I wrote Broncos vs. Donkeys last fall. What a can of worms that was.
As for this post, it’s too black and white. There is no such thing as a completely perfect or completely incompetent coach. I was willing to see McD get a few years to let his plan pan out but I was not disappointed to see him go. I am just hoping that the squirrel found quite a few nuts so the last couple years don’t end up a complete waste.
by relocated bronco in NC on Jun 13, 2011 2:37 PM MDT up reply actions
especially
when I pulled out my Faiders, Queefs and Dolts propaganda
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 5:07 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Good article. McD did do some things right. Problem is most people disliked McD as a person and that clouds their judgements of his coaching tenure.
That being said I am glad that we have a more experienced coach in John Fox to run the team!
by Adam Manter on Jun 13, 2011 11:42 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
An 3-11 record in year 2 was pretty crystal clear.
The funny thing about McDs few remaining supporters is that they love to point out the 6 game winning streak so let’s look at that. Those were the 6 games closest to the Shanny era. The closest that team was to the 2008 version of the Broncos (which was completely average squad BTW).
As Denver got farther away from Shanny and farther along in the McD program, the losses mounted, the blowouts became more severe and the play of the team deteriorated.
McD’s teams and the W/L record did nothing but regress from day one until the day he was fired. That pretty much said it all about his tenure. It wasn’t about McD’s personality, it was about his terrible performance as our HC/GM. That is the reason why he was fired and while people judge him harshly. He earned the disdain via bad coaching.
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 13, 2011 11:52 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Pat Bowlen and the Denver Broncos made a major mistake in giving McD full control of the team...
There must be checks and balances in a football team and that’s what got us in trouble during Shanny’s last few years. The NFL draft is a double-edged sword and McD coming in knew he had to fix both sides especially when he and Cutler didn’t hit it off. What did he do? He went to the well of free agency for the defensive side of the ball with trying to impliment a new scheme. He went to the draft to fix the offensive side starting off with Moreno who most said was a good choice at the time. When he drafted Ayers to play a different role it gave me the impression that he thought he could do anything with the team to make it successful. The experiment failed at least in that scheme…
Knowing that Marshall was gone the WR position was a position of need and he decided on D Thomas rather than Dez Bryant. A move I highly approved of because I feel Bryant will eventually be a prototype of TO…Now the young man hurts himself in the offseason and has been hurt for most of his young career. Too early to give up on him yet I believe. Decker was a brilliant move and will pay off in the long run.
Tim Tebow a was gutsy move for McD and a move that has caused more debate than any other in the 2010 draft. I admired McD for the guts he had to make the moves to get Tim. Sure Tim is raw and so are the other quarterbacks who have been drafted the past 2 years. Tebow will lead this team to championships soon and then the mouths of all of the Tebow haters will be shut forever…
Orson Welles is better known for his radio ‘lie’ to the people that stirred wide spread panic, “War of the Worlds”.
by bfree2bronc on Jun 13, 2011 11:51 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
It would have been much smarter if McD simply took Tebow with the pick we used on DT. Then we’d still have the four high picks we traded away for Tim/DT.
I get McD’s desire to obtain Tebow. What I don’t get was Josh’s desire to blow his load on DT.
The Lockout bores me.
D Thom suffered an injury during his draft season
which didn’t allow him to run. Many thought he would’ve run a sub 4.4 40, and at his size that could’ve meant top 10. Let’s not forget the numbers he put up in a triple option offense. He fell due to lack of experience running routes and the injury, a steal in my eyes.
I loved both picks, but I was actually more confident in Thomas panning out then Tebow. If Thomas can finally get healthy we’ll see the next Calvin Johnson, the size to speed ratio made me blow my load on DT.
If you reply to a comment/post/fanshot of mine, I will more likely then not respond to it, unless you come off like a d-bag.
by DBroncs1414 on Jun 13, 2011 12:02 PM MDT up reply actions
DT reminds me much more of a David Boston than Calvin Johnson.
DT, even as an uninjured draft prospect, was a very poor man’s Calvin Johnson. The #1 thing they have in common is playing WR at Georgia Tech.
Thomas also had other negatives in his draft bio with concerns about his hands and lack of concentration. Both of which were on display too often in his rookie season.
Add in the fact that he is always coming up hurt or injured (must have been five instances of this in the regular season) then the off season nightmare.
That you’d still be more excited for DT than Tebow is bizarre and based entirely on a hunch with little 2010 evidence to back that up. In fact, you are betting against the house and odds with that one.
The one thing DT does seem to have going for him is drive to rehab and get healthy. So he beats Boston in that regard. I still doubt we see him until 2012, his 3rd year in the league is a long time to make any impact on our roster.
The Lockout bores me.
Got Roids?
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
Not one of SD’s better FA signings. And yes Boydy, Boston had lots of roids. He loved the gym more than the field. really a weird dude.
The Lockout bores me.
Anytime I read about this guy
I really just cant help laughing. He straight up got paid by the Chargers, and then promptly proceeded to spend all his free time lifting. He eventually became so jacked that they had to try him at TE before he faded into obscurity.
Winning
by Foilhat on Jun 13, 2011 10:47 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
hahaha David Boston
absolutely jacked out of this world…whenever I saw him I could never believe he was a WR
A baseball park is the one place where a man's wife doesn't mind his getting excited over somebody else's curves
by waterboy31321 on Jun 14, 2011 8:23 AM MDT up reply actions
As San Diego found out, he wasn’t a WR. He was a body builder they paid an awful lot of wasted money to.
The Lockout bores me.
which is good for the Broncos
No save ammunition all bullets in gun now- Bruce Campbell
Stand up straight a man looks more confident when he is erect- Taj
GO BRONCOS
Hands and lack of concentration are slight concerns
and are easily coachable. And on Johnson, Thomas had to do all he did in a triple option while Johnson had the luxury of a pro style O. Sorry McG but you are horribly wrong on your analysis of Thomas, he and Megatron both share a ridic siz/speed ratio, display awesome strength for the position, and excel on deep balls.
And I didn’t say more excited, I say more confident, as in more confident he won’t bust. The only way I see Thomas bust is if his injuries persist. For Tebow, I can see other ways that would happen, although I wouldn’t bet on it either.
I still have trouble indicting Thomas last year. He was oft injured throughout TC and when he was on the field his injuries persisted. That along with the fact that the rest of the WRs were on fire so oppurtunities were few and far between when he actually could play. I have trouble seeing him play to his potential next year with his newest injuries, but I guarantee if he can get through an offseason healthy, he’ll be a beast and justify the high pick
If you reply to a comment/post/fanshot of mine, I will more likely then not respond to it, unless you come off like a d-bag.
by DBroncs1414 on Jun 13, 2011 10:52 PM MDT up reply actions
Big if but I agree
He could be a beast.
Personally I was far happier with Eric Decker pick than Tebow or DT. Of course I credit Stokely with the Decker pick (which is probably absurd)
I was happier with the Decker pick than the Thomas pick...
Now Tebow was in my garage for the whole time leading up to the draft, thanks to Sayre and his persistence of Tim being ‘it’…Tebow is Broncos!
I support and like Tebow
But QBs are always such gambles that I never get excited about them in drafts.
I was thinking the same thing McGeorge...
It would have been much smarter if McD simply took Tebow with the pick we used on DT. Then we’d still have the four high picks we traded away for Tim/DT.
by bfree2bronc on Jun 13, 2011 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions
leaving room
for at least four more alphonso smiths!
okay, maybe that was too harsh…
I'm not sugarcoating this.
by oxmouth on Jun 13, 2011 1:01 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I didn’t hate McD’s 2010 draft nearly as much as the 2009 draft. He had improved, which is why those four thrown away picks is such a bummer.
Instead of Tebow and DT, we could have drafted Tebow, Lamarr Houston, Terrance Cody, Donald Butler and Aaron Hernandez.
I’d rather have Houston, Cody, Butler and Hernandez than DT. Truth be told, I’d take any ONE of those guys over DT.
The Lockout bores me.
tebow makes or breaks 2010. i thought he was a big reach at the time but i’m thinking differently now. if he’s for real that draft will look pretty darn good and kudos goes to mcD… for that.
I'm not sugarcoating this.
HA HA HA HA HA
No save ammunition all bullets in gun now- Bruce Campbell
Stand up straight a man looks more confident when he is erect- Taj
GO BRONCOS
I agree 100% McGeorge
Chalk up another for the Black and white
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
Well as the saying goes
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while. That Blind Squirrel is McDaniels, and I think the nut is Tebow.
Or....
…even a broken clock is right twice a day.
"Pain don't hurt" - Swayze (Road House) -- We miss you man!
I prefer the broken clock analogy
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 12:47 PM MDT up reply actions
What about
Even a Chiefs fan gets to root for their team in the playoffs, eventually.
A pessimist sees the difficulties in every opportunity.
An optimist sees the opportunities in every difficulty.
- Winston Churchill
First (and only, in our lifetimes) team to three consecutive SB wins (perhaps and then some)!!!! ( =
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Jun 13, 2011 12:48 PM MDT up reply actions
even some raider fans get out of high school?…
I'm not sugarcoating this.
by oxmouth on Jun 13, 2011 12:50 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
OK Ox
you win!
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 12:51 PM MDT up reply actions
Well duh
Wording is important… They get out of high school… or actually graduate high school?
LoL, I kid, I kid, I totally mean what you know.
A pessimist sees the difficulties in every opportunity.
An optimist sees the opportunities in every difficulty.
- Winston Churchill
First (and only, in our lifetimes) team to three consecutive SB wins (perhaps and then some)!!!! ( =
by PearlJamBroncoGFunk on Jun 13, 2011 1:10 PM MDT up reply actions
or a KC fan
eventually gets to watch his Queefs win a playoff game, something that has not happened since 1993. To put this in perspective, next Monday, June 20, I am 29 and in 1993, I was 11.
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 12:52 PM MDT up reply actions
Ahhh, but how do you know my friend?
How do you know Tebow isn’t ready? He has exclusively been taking snaps from under center and it wouldn’t shock me if he straight up beat out Orton out for the job! TD said it perfect – when you look at Tebow’s greatness, you don’t have to look at just him…. watch the team around him play their guts out. That is the sign of a true franchise signal caller. When will it be “acceptable” to say Tebow might be the real deal?
P.S. for the record, even though I disagreed with a few McD moves, I loved a lot of them as well. The young O-Lineman, Robert Ayers, Cox, Moreno, etc., etc. McD messed up by putting too many irons in that fire.
"When Tim Tebow does pushups, he's not pushing himself up, he's pushing the world down."
"Gear down there big shifter This is the "No Bull" review man…" a total Lebowski-esque one liner from Sadaraine, whether he realizes it or not - comedic gold.
by PaleHorse78 on Jun 13, 2011 11:56 AM MDT reply actions 3 recs
Didn't know what you meant with "irons in that fire" so I looked it up.
“we mean that if we attempt to do to much at once, we shall not do anything properly. As another proverb puts it: HE WHO BEGINS MANY THINGS, FINISHES BUT FEW”
Most excellent proverb usage my man!
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 13, 2011 12:30 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Thanks McG
I try buddy ;-)
"When Tim Tebow does pushups, he's not pushing himself up, he's pushing the world down."
"Gear down there big shifter This is the "No Bull" review man…" a total Lebowski-esque one liner from Sadaraine, whether he realizes it or not - comedic gold.
by PaleHorse78 on Jun 14, 2011 10:50 AM MDT up reply actions
First off
Citizen Kane sucked.
2nd off, I see your point against the blind Tebow lovers, but at the same time the kid showed in 3 games what we wanted from Orton all season: gutsy, all on the line performances, moving the ball, and SCORING! He did all this with the same lack of D and running game Orton had.
Tebow is far from a finished product, sure. The best way to see what Tebow can be is to actually play him on the field. Sure, we can point to Rodgers and Palmer, but ask any football player/coach and they’ll tell you the best way to learn is on the field.
To keep Tim Tebow as a backup while Orton plays is a waste, we know what we got in Orton, and it led us to a 3-10 record. With Tebow we don’t know what we have, and in a rebuilding season we might as well find out now instead of later down the road. I doubt Orton will be a Bronco past next year anyways, so to start him in a likely losing season next year gets us NOWHERE. I’m not saying Tebow should be handed the starting job, but I just don’t see the benefit in starting Orton over Tebow for the long term.
If you reply to a comment/post/fanshot of mine, I will more likely then not respond to it, unless you come off like a d-bag.
by DBroncs1414 on Jun 13, 2011 11:56 AM MDT reply actions 3 recs
Rosebud!
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 12:47 PM MDT up reply actions
Why must you make this stuff up ?
He didnt have the same defense if he did we wouldve lost the Texans game because the same defense doesnt make that defensive play.
He had 5 turnovers in 3 games and over a 1/3 of those points scored in those 3 games came off turnovers by the defense . Thats nearly a 1/3 of our turnovers in in those final 3 games.
Orton didnt move the ball or score or play gutsy all year its amazing how many of you make this stuff up and then I fully expect you to cry and whine about how thats not what you are saying.
We do know what we have in Orton . A QB who was very productive in the worst situation so why would we get rid of him before we see what he can do in a better situation . possible
When it all comes down to it if the only way some of you can prop Tim up is by trying to tear down Orton well that doesnt bode well for Tim in the NFL .
by Hoopforia on Jun 13, 2011 11:15 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
The difference between you and I when it comes to Orton is that you consider production to be yards. I consider production to be points and victories.
Orton (exactly like Cutler in 2008) failed my measure of performance. But if we’re just counting yards, Orton and Jay are money good. Both are better for the fantasy footballers than the real game.
I’m glad you noticed the D played better when Tebow was in the game. I hope you also noticed the crowd made more noise and the running game perked up. Those are the exact intangibles that make Tim special that Orton will never be able to conjure with his excellence between the 20s and his ineptitude inside the red zone. The team plays better with Tebow under center because they know they have a better chance to win than when Kyle is running the show.
Tebow > Orton
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 14, 2011 5:51 AM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
That is the difference between
Orton and Tebow debates in general. Most of the folks that are debating that Orton is a decent to good player state the Defense and running game were improving and that Tebow came into a team that was better than Orton had to begin with. The team improved throughout the year and by the simple fact of Tebow playing later in the season benefited from a better team.
In fact, our backs ended up with fewer yards when Tebow started. We had more rushing yards by virtue of Tebow running, not by a better run game.
I have no doubt that Tebow brings a motivation and excitement with him but I would hate to depend on that to be a difference making factor.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Why. Motivation and excitement are the lifeblood of a sport that demands you disregard your health on every play. Football is not and will never be a thinking man’s game. It’s far to violent and dangerous.
And it’s BS to say Denver was better or improving as the year progressed. That doesn’t bare out at all. We were getting hammered in October by the likes of Oakland and Baltimore, hammered in November by San Diego and hammered again in December by Arizona and Oakland.
We sucked in week one and we still sucked in week 17. Our coaching, defense and ST play were awful throughout the season. Tebow had the same crappy team to work with as Orton. He just got a little more out of it than Orton did. Which is very surprising considering he was a rookie and very raw as a passer. Just shows you how much better he really could be.
The Lockout bores me.
Just went through all 17 weeks of game stats
The teams rushing yards increased steadily through the season with the three weeks prior to Tebow taking over being quite promising. Then Tebow comes in and our net yards and rushing yards don’t change all that much, but now Tebow is our leading rushing two out of three weeks and he is credited with 8, 10, and finally 13 rush attempts. I don’t want my QB to be the leading rusher on the team!
Week One Vs. Jaguars
Total Net Yards 363
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 15 60 1 17
Correll Buckhalter 6 15 0 7
Kyle Orton 2 12 0 7
Tim Tebow 2 2 0 1
Total 89
Week Two Vs. Seahawks
Total Net Yards 369
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 24 51 1 9
Correll Buckhalter 11 19 1 4
Kyle Orton 3 -5 0 -1
Total 65
Week Three Vs Colts
Total Net Yards 519
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Laurence Maroney 12 24 0 6
Correll Buckhalter 4 12 0 7
Kyle Orton 2 11 0 9
Total 47
Week Four Vs. Titans
Total Net Yards 327
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Kyle Orton 3 11 0 8
Laurence Maroney 11 5 0 8
Correll Buckhalter 6 3 0 5
Total 19
Week Five Vs. Ravens
Total Net Yards 346
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Laurence Maroney 6 27 0 13
Correll Buckhalter 5 13 0 8
Andre Brown 2 -1 0 0
Total 39
Week Six Vs. Jets
Total Net Yards 346
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 12 48 0 14
Tim Tebow 6 23 1 6
Kyle Orton 3 22 0 13
Correll Buckhalter 6 20 0 13
Laurence Maroney 7 18 0 9
Eddie Royal 1 13 0 13
Spencer Larsen 1 1 0 1
Britton Colquitt 1 0 0 0
Total 145
Week Seven Vs. Raiders
Total Net Yards 240
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 14 53 0 13
Kyle Orton 2 21 0 14
Demaryius Thomas 1 1 0 1
Total 75
Week Eight Vs. 9ers
Total Net Yards 398
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 11 40 0 17
Kyle Orton 3 18 0 8
Tim Tebow 2 1 1 1
Demaryius Thomas 1 0 0 0
Total 59
Week Nine Vs. BYE
Week Ten Vs. Chiefs
Total Net Yards 452
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 22 106 0 14
Eddie Royal 2 20 0 19
Spencer Larsen 2 17 0 14
Lance Ball 2 9 0 5
Tim Tebow 2 2 1 1
Kyle Orton 1 -1 0 -1
Total 153
Week 11 Vs. Chargers
Total Net Yards 235
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 13 58 1 12
Kyle Orton 1 4 0 4
Lance Ball 1 1 0 1
Total 62
Week 12 Vs. Rams
Total Net Yards 449
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 12 56 1 16
Lance Ball 4 31 0 17
Eddie Royal 1 20 0 20
Correll Buckhalter 1 12 0 12
Total 119
Week 13 Vs. Chiefs
Total Net Yards 247
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 23 161 0 24
Total 161
Week 14 Vs. Cardinals
Total Net Yards 288
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Knowshon Moreno 19 81 1 12
Lance Ball 8 38 0 19
Eddie Royal 2 8 0 18
Kyle Orton 2 5 0 5
Total 132
Week 15 Vs. Raiders
Total Net Yards 235
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Tim Tebow 8 78 1 40
Lance Ball 15 20 0 8
Knowshon Moreno 4 5 0 6
Correll Buckhalter 6 3 0 6
Total 106
Week 16 Vs. Texans
Total Net Yards 431
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Correll Buckhalter 11 42 1 10
Lance Ball 5 38 0 15
Tim Tebow 10 27 1 11
Knowshon Moreno 7 19 0 11
Total 126
Week 17 Vs. Chargers
Total Net Yards 337
Rushing ATT YDS TD LG
Tim Tebow 13 94 1 30
Knowshon Moreno 6 41 0 35
Lance Ball 6 21 0 17
Correll Buckhalter 3 8 0 4
Brandon Lloyd 1 -18 0 -18
Total 146
This thing doesn’t do tables worth a damn but you can see the rushing totals for each game. I don’t see where anyone can say Tebow impacted the running game in any way other than to take yards away from our backs. We didn’t run better, we just had a different runner. We didn’t win more, they just looked better losing. The Team did get better through the season and you can’t credit Tebow with making the run game any better.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
by Sean in Pa. on Jun 14, 2011 12:47 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
You love playing fast and cheap with your stats. Tebow averaged 6.41 yards per carry in his three starts (also had 3 rushing TDs in those games). So guess what… you can credit Tebow with making the running game better because he does make it better. Proof in pudding Sean.
You can please point out to me where our other RBs averaged 6.41 yards per carry or 1 TD per game in 2010. hint.. you are wasting your time.
Tim is a better runner than several of our 2010 tailbacks. I’d trust Tebow to gain running yards over Ball or Hall (I can’t tell the difference) 11 times out of 10. I’d take him over Buckhalter as well.
And we didn’t look better losing, what we looked like was a competitive team under Tebow in games vs Houston and San Diego. We were not competitive in many of Orton’s 2011 starts (AZ, Indy, SD, Baltimore, Raiders) and Kyle lost to some pretty bad teams like Arizona and St Louis. He got us all of 6 points in his game at KC. Huge difference between getting your ass kicked and losing competitive games. And for the record. In 2010, Tebow’s winning % was .333. Orton’s was .273. As Tebow was a rookie playing his first ever NFL starts, that doesn’t say much for Kyle.
You are correct in that we don’t want our QB running 13 times a game. That will = injury. I’d like to see him around 6 carries per game and I’d like most of those to be in the red-zone or on 3rd/4th and very short. But don’t fool yourself into believing that nonsense about Tebow not making our running game better. I’ll tell you who doesn’t make our running game better. His name is Kyle Orton.
The Lockout bores me.
ok had to let this set a while
You love playing fast and cheap with your stats.
You seem to love ignoring them
You can please point out to me where our other RBs averaged 6.41 yards per carry or 1 TD per game in 2010.
This is where you don’t understand my argument at all. I DON’T WANT MY QB TO BE THE MAIN RUSHER! None the less, your six yards per carry are greatly enhanced by a 40 yd run in week 15, leaving him with 7 attempts for 36 yards. In week 17 he had a 30 yd run leaving him with 12 attempts for 64 yards. In his four other appearances he had 6 -23 yds for a little under 4yds per carry, otherwise he was averaging about 1 yd per carry through three games going 2-2 , 2-1 and 2-2. Again, in the last three games Tebow had a good run average while our running backs lost their touches. That is not making our running game better. Nice stats for Tebow, not for our team.
As for your claim that Orton does not make our run game better, I say you are wrong. If, and that is a big if we can get our O-line to give us some run lanes then we won’t need Tebow to beast his way through. If our RB’s can get some lanes then I bet Ortons pass game with make for a nice nightmare that opposing defenses won’t want to face. It is not Ortons job to make the run game better, in the run game he is simplly supposed to sell the fake and let the rest of the team make the run game work. Orton can sell the fake, we know that already.
And we didn’t look better losing, what we looked like was a competitive team
ok, so you think a competitive loss is better and I say a loss is a loss. They mean the same thing no matter how we looked. You keep pointing out how terrible Orton looked against KC, That was the second game, what do you think about how he looked in the first KC game?
The whole team lost big last year, not Kyle Orton. The whole team went 1-2 under Tebow. We LOST those exciting games.
Tebow getting good run stats means our O-line and run game suck.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Oh, and
I have Tebow on the season with 43 carries for 225 yds = 5.23 yds per carry
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Too funny..
I love it when people play “what if” with stats. You need to remember that game can go both ways and then you’ll realize how futile that exercise is.
So, let’s play..what if the dropped TD pass in the Raiders game was complete and we win.. now TT is 2-1 instead of 1-2 and he has a winning record. What if the hail mary at the end of the SD game is complete and we win and now TT is 3-0 and undefeated….see what i mean?
Also, have to disagree with the “loss is a loss” statement. A competitive loss tells you that you were in the game and can compete. It provides motivation to get a little bit better or make that extra effort play in order to win the next game. A blowout on the other hand tends to be demoralizing and often has a negative effect on the next game if not the season for both the players and the fans.
"as in football so in life"
Where did I what if?
I removed the two long runs and and showed what his stats were without them but I did not use them to prove any points. Just pointing out the two long runs.
A competitive loss shows that you were in the game, a lot of competitive losses show you need to work on your game. A blowout can be demoralizing, and it can be a motivator. It is all in how you look at it.
I get the fact that folks want to see Tebow. I don’t even think he is the worst choice to make, but, if Tebow is going to be our starter then who is going to be our back up? Where is Brady Quinn? Why don’t we hear about him throwing the football? If Tebow is going to be our starter, where is the Denver Post? Why aren’t they asking Quinn questions about him being our back up? Why doesn’t anyone care about who our back up will be if Tebow starts? If Tim Tebow starts and runs like he did at the end of last year then I think our back up QB is going to be a very important topic!!
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Own it..
You "what if’d " when you removed the 2 long runs and you were most certainly using it to try to make the point that “but for” the 2 long runs TT’s average would not be that good…no big deal, but you said it so own it. I was simply pointing out the futility in doing so and how that can go both ways. As for competitive losses vs blowouts, I’ve sat in locker rooms after both and I can assure you there is a major difference.
"as in football so in life"
ok, whatever
Yes, take out the two long runs and the average comes down. Yes. Remove that sentence from my post and you get the same post.
In fact, my point of his yards looking better than they were is further enhanced by my math that has him with a much lower average.
Really, I like a mobile QB that can make those long runs out of a broken play. But to suggest that starting him will get a six yard average runner in the game is scarey to say the least.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
OK ??
So you use your math and remove the yards and I’ll use my math and add the 2 TD’s and 2 wins and now what does the conversation look like?
BTW, I don’t think McGeorge was suggesting that he will always average 6 yards, he was using the avg to illustrate the difference.
"as in football so in life"
I didn't remove any yards
The math is correct. I think that is where you are mis understanding me. All I did was in that one sentence say that in those two games, each had one long run and the average for those games was enhanced by them. No stats were adjusted anywhere else.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
by Sean in Pa. on Jun 15, 2011 10:08 AM MDT up reply actions
My math is correct. Tebow averaged 6.41 ypc in his three starts.
Kyle Orton has a great play fake. Can’t deny that truth and it sure helps him in the play action. If I’m suggesting some team will use a 2nd round draft pick to acquire Orton, that says I think Orton doesn’t suck. Far from it. 2nd round picks are a high price to pay for a player trade and you know this. Hoopforia is too dense to pick up on that.
That Kyle Orton usually lost the 2nd matchup each season really bugs me. Teams adjusted to him easily and then really shut him down hard in game 2. That IS A BIG PROBLEM. And Kyle Orton lost the KC game by himself. He was brutal. There were other games when Orton played well and the team let him down. St Louis comes to mind.
The Lockout bores me.
This second game at KC thing really bothers me
Orton lost it, Orton sucked, well he wasn’t out there alone.
Knowshon Moreno was the only player with rushing stats for that game. He gained 161 yds on 23 carries. That sounds like coaching to me.
Kyle Orton was 9 of 28 passing. Were all of those bad throws? No INT’s
We did have a back up to go in if KO was playing that badly.
Coaching?
Stop blaming Kyle Orton for 2010. We had all of our players out there losing games!
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
I agree Sean
2010 was in no way all on Orton. I’d say the coaching was probably more culpable than anything else.
"as in football so in life"
I’d always lay 2010 at the feet of McD and his pathetic coaching staff. I ran that poor tool into the ground here at MHR.
Orton was one of our ten best players in 2010, which is painful to say because he is not a top 10 player on most NFL teams (not even top 20 on a lot of teams) but most teams have far more talent than the 2010 Donkies.
Orton was okay in 2010. The team sucked so that means he was better than his sucky teammates. But that doesn’t mean he was good. He wasn’t.
Denver doesn’t need to waste another snap with Kyle under center. He shouldn’t be in our future plans because he is just an okay NFL QB and okay NFL QBs on rebuilding teams like Denver produce 4-12 seasons that go nowhere.
The Lockout bores me.
Woah
You said the D word, can’t really dispute that about last years team :(
I give Orton more leeway than you. Without much more than faith, or from my eyes type stuff. I just think that he has grown with the Broncos and a solid team around him may just help him to look pretty damn good. There’s nothing wrong with that either. Do I think he is a long term fit here? No. I do hope for him to find a home somewhere.
I really am glad to see reports on Quinn. If he has been working with a QB specialist and keeping his game ready then I will be very hopeful for the team roster most here want.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
by Sean in Pa. on Jun 16, 2011 12:14 PM MDT up reply actions
well thats your opinion of the difference the way I see it Im able to place context behind the number while you dont seem to care much about that at all.
when you look at Ortons numbers and apply the context of
worst defense worst starting field position
one of the worst running games
limited weapons
well then there is gonna be a limit to how many points can be scored in that situation
teams that score a lot of points do so in a variety of ways and the QB of those offense gets setup to score those points by the other phases of the game.
Thats the difference between 21 ppg and 27 ppg
A QB can scrap and scrape to get you 20-21 ppg but to get into 26-28 ppg hes gonna have to have a defense or special teams give him a couple of short fields or even the occasional score or even more possessions through turnovers . There is usually some form of easy tds involved .
As far as fantasy football man please it seems how quickly youve forgotten your claims when Orton first arrived here and now you are claiming him to suddenly be a better fantasy Qb than real one ? talk about being a hypocrite ….
Now you are gonna give Tebow credit for the defensive plays ? You think that the crowd was louder in those final 2 games than it was against the Chiefs ? jets ? Seattle ? or any of our other home games sans the Raiders ?
What ineptitude inside the redzone ? why dont you post those numbers ? The team didnt play any better at home with Tebow under center than it di with Ortons ?
The previous two home games with Orton our offense scored 33 points and 41 points .
I love how some of you drag the entire team through the mud in favor of Tebow . At the end of the jets game with us winning the defense gave up that play to the jets because they felt they didnt have a chance of winning with Orton running the show ?
Youve been flat out wrong about Orton since the day he arrived and I have no doubt you will continue to be as well.
And guess how many points Denver scored in the last two games he started for Denver.
That’d be 6 and 13. Both losses. Orton threw 3 Ints and no TDs. Didn’t run for any either. He was 9 for 28 in KC with a 46 QB rating. He was 19/41 vs Arizona with a 27 QB rating. So much for getting better as the year wore on. Or maybe we’ll just blame the D for those two as well.
And BTW. Tebow played with the same deck of cards that included what you wrote as “worst defense worst starting field position / one of the worst running games / limited weapons” Orton’s O averaged 20 points per game while Tebow’s averaged 25 with the same lousy teammates.
The exact same call that doomed us vs the Jets gave us the Victory over the Titans. Exact same call. It’s plus one minus one, but you clearly want to give credit to Orton for one and look the other way on the other. BS.
So end the end, you just sound whiny and like you have no idea what you’re talking about.
And for the record, I was the first person on MHR to say I’d take Orton straight up over Cassel, Campbell, Garrard or Alex Smith. That was back when (2009) those guys were considered better than they are today (exception of Cassel). I’m not an Orton hater by a long shot and never have been. But I don’t have my head up his a## either.
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 14, 2011 2:40 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
you mean the last two ROAD GAMES when he was injured ?
Tebows offense didnt average 25 ppg unless you are counting the kick return which as far as I know no one counts as offensive tds
Tebow also scored 3 times on 5 turnovers for 21 points during that span . Those 5 turnovers were nearly 1/3 of our total turnovers for the entire season .
When the defense gave Orton multiple turnovers in gamae we scored 31 points against Seattle .
Now you are gonna try and claim that if given turnovers and a short field that we wouldnt be able to score under Orton ? Thats BS
Our offense were 14th in redzone scoring despite everything stacked against it
It was 11th in the league redzone scoring attempts despite everything stacked against it
It was 12 in redzone scoring despite everything stacked against it
If you dont think that a special teams td or multiple turnovers in a game wouldve helped our offense score more points prior to the final 3 games of the season your just lying to yourself.
I think Its quite clear that I never said the defense was good the last 3 games only showed how they made more plays as did the special teams that gave the offense a chance to score more points .
Thats what you ignore and thats why you are peddling this BS all over the place
WTF are you talking about comparing the Titans and Jets games does Orton play defense ? Where did I mention the Titans game at all ?
Against the Texans Dawk got a deflection that led to a pick that sealed the game while the Texans were in fg range to kick the game winner . I clearly showed that if we get a deflection or bat down on 4th down in our stadium we win that game.
the defense made plays the last 3 that simply didnt make earlier in the season .
Your are a frickin liar yes I said it youve been hating on Orton here from the start . As I said before straight up hypocrite none of those Qbs were even being talked about becauise I recall quite frankly lengthy discussions in which you claimed a noodle arm ,no deep ball ,game manager and now you are declaring him some fantasy darling lol
We won the Titans game in the exact same way we lost the Jet game. A long PI call that was the correct call in both instances. You want to credit Orton’s W/L record and give him snaps for the Titan win, but sweep the Jet loss under the rug. That makes no sense. That is you peddling your BS.
Our D played great vs the Chiefs in KC, but Orton was awful and pretty much lost that game on his own. Guess you’ll blame the D in that one. He was just as bad a week later in Arizona. You’ll use the excuse that he was playing hurt. If he was a real leader towards the end of 2010, he’d take himself out of those two games where his play was so bad that he was the primary reason his team lost.
D played well vs Indy, but Orton and Co couldn’t score. Blame the D right! 49ers, exact same story with Orton passing for 370 yards as we scored just 16. Blame everyone but the offense please.
And you embarrass yourself with your continued instance what I’ve said about Orton over the years. Absolutely none of what you just claimed can or will be able to backed up by you It doesn’t take any skill to make up nonsense and argue against that, but keep right on going with that.
You will be the first person I think of when Orton is traded in a few weeks for a 2nd round pick. BTW, 2nd round is great value for a guy that was a throw in on the Cutler deal. As I’ve said many times before, Orton turned out to be the best piece Denver got in that deal and they’ll do well again when they trade your boy for a #2. Does that sound like hating on Kyle to you? In your warped and distorted view, probably so.
The Lockout bores me.
He's been spot on about Orton.
Hoop you have been shown time and time and time again that Tebow outperformed Orton last year. They scored more points with Tebow under center and were a far more competitive team, against COMMON OPPONENTS no less. All this without the benefit of any first team snaps during the season.
McGeorge is far from a hypocrite. He is quite possibly the most astute football fan on this blog. And he is right. You can be a fan of both players and still be honest in your assestment. You my friend have never been.
"The problem with quotes in internet signatures is 90% of them are made up -Ghandi"
common opponents mean nothing unless you are gonna convince me that both teams ran the exact same plays
Are you really gonna try and convince me that from the first game to the second game neither team learned anything ? That we didnt make any adjustments ?
You love Mcgeorge fine get a room I dont care but what about my assessment hasnt been honest ?
All Ive been shown is cherry picked numbers and various situations exaggerated to absurdity .
If what you said is true Orton wouldnt be even be the starting QB now Tebow would be declared the starter already if he had outperformed Orton there would no reason to wait but again the management obvious isnt falling for the BS either so why should I .
I understand why you probably wouldn’t want to talk common opponents or 2nd helpings because Orton got absolutely stomped by Oakland and San Diego in 2010 where as Tebow fared better vs both common opponents.
Then Orton smokes KC only to have KC make a few adjustments and embarrass Kyle just a few weeks later. Story of Orton’s Bronco career. Once teams have a chance to adjust to Kyle, they did and proceeded to lay the hammer on him the next go round.
Same thing with San Diego in 2009. KC in 2009 and Oakland in 2009.
Here is where you point out to me that Orton threw for 431 yards and we scored 24 points in that blowout loss.
The Lockout bores me.
Careful on the adjustment claim McGeorge
While what you say may well be true, as yet we have not had a chance to see how opponents will scheme for Tebow the second time round. At a guess, sometime during 2012 they will decide to challenge Tebow to beat them with his arm and then we will all get to know what we have in him.
I have so many friends some I haven't even used yet
by BlobTheMagnificent on Jun 15, 2011 7:57 AM MDT up reply actions
The claim regarding Orton is valid considering the facts presented.
Whether or not the same will apply to Tebow is an unknown. However, from a scheming standpoint the extra dimension that TT brings to the game makes it much more difficult for the defense to dictate to the Offense. I also believe that Fox will not start Tebow if he can’t make the reads and passes necessary to defeat the obvious adjustments. Whether it’s screens or slants to beat the blitz or outs and curls to beat the nickel and dime zones. Most D coordinators I’ve read say that it’s much harder to scheme for highly mobile QB’s.
"as in football so in life"
I really think that is what the team is waiting for
At the point where Tim can make the reads effectively while taking snaps under center, he will be turned loose. He showed in the 3 games last year, that the Pro level was still too fast for him. He held the ball too long at times and was indecisive. To be fair, some of that had to do with the lack of protection. But knowing where the outlets are on any given play, makes these decisions quicker. Offensive awareness I guess. That takes time to learn and is something Orton talked about last year. Being in the offense for two years helped him immensely. That is why I counsel patience with Tebow. He will get his chance, but only when the coaching staff thinks so.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
Totally agree KK
There is absolutely no substitute for repetition. It would have been unrealistic to expect any rookie to come in with the lmited # of reps he had and make the right read more than 50% of the time. I also think that’s the biggest dilemna that FEX have to deal with. Are we better with KO starting which will limit TT’s reps and thereby slow his learning curve or should we speed the curve up by putting him in and maximizing the reps and in-game experience? I trust that Fox will make the right decision either way.
"as in football so in life"
I agree with McG. He looked slow because his only first team reps came a week before the Oakland game.
I’m not saying he’ll be elite. I sure hope so and think the potential is there. I do think he needs a season of 1st team reps before we can make any sort of call on it.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 12:53 PM MDT up reply actions
He held the ball too long at times and was indecisive.
exactly. this wasn’t tebow’s only struggle but it was his glaring one. i wouldn’t be angry or anything if he ends up sitting for awhile but i think where i tend to differ with you a little is that the best way to learn offensive awareness is to play real football and the most opportune time to do that is when your team sucks and you’re rebuilding. denver seems like a ripe place right now for a growing QB to learn in. it’s funny, but i think this is the crux of all the MHR head butting these days. not so much orton hate/tebow love, but what the best way to go about seeing what tebow’s got and what his ceiling or floor could be.
I'm not sugarcoating this.
by oxmouth on Jun 15, 2011 11:21 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
Really??? The game TOO fast for him! What a load of crap man...sorry, aboslute Bull Shit...and you are better than that KK....hes a rookie and played well...
FIRE DE MAURICE SMITH...he can go suck dog balls for all I care!
NFLPA??? National Fools and Lame Pricks Association!
ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN SEEING WHAT WE HAVE IN TEBOW? Watching Kyle orton is like watching re-runs of the Brady Bunch...you always know whats going to happen and makes you feel sick at the end!
"I actually watched the World Cup. I HATE baseball. Hockey’s over. Hey, at least we have the WNBA. Oh, man. I’m making a noose. Want one?"
Harv Neptune.
lol, definitely not too fast.
He didn’t look like Max Hall or Ken Anderson, or even Tavaris Jackson in his 1st 3 starts. If anything he showed he can handle the pro game very well. Yes he held the ball long but that will go away with more reps and more experience with the NFL speed.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 12:55 PM MDT up reply actions
Common Opponents is the fairest and most accurate comparison.
I realize that you are mentally challenged but THE FACT THAT YOU DISCOUNT COMMON OPPONENTS IS DISHONEST. Is that simple enough for you? All you have been shown is irrefutible evidence. The fact that you don’t admit it makes you a liar, a fool or as I suspect, both.
"The problem with quotes in internet signatures is 90% of them are made up -Ghandi"
He is a liar, not a fool.
I think we finally ran him off. He’ll have to be better prepared for the next time.
The Lockout bores me.
The QB i compare Orton to is Fitzpatrick.. Fitz accumulated similar stats to Orton with a horrible D and not so good run game but still ended up with a 7-9 record. How?
Coaching. The coaching was horrible. Orton was good. not great but good. With better coaching IMO we are 7-9 like the Bills. I like Orton. I’m not against the guy but my eyes tell me we have a better option in Tebow and when you believe that then you go with it. You don’t believe it and that’s your perogative.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 12:47 PM MDT up reply actions
100% agree with you sir
No save ammunition all bullets in gun now- Bruce Campbell
Stand up straight a man looks more confident when he is erect- Taj
GO BRONCOS
A lot of bluster but I don’t think there are many valid points here.
There are a lot of people that thing McD made wrong moves in different ways, but I don’t know anyone that thinks he did everything wrong (even aside from Tebow). This is basically taking down a straw man in a rather dramatic way. And I don’t get the movie comparison, why not compare him to Neil Armstrong or the fourth musketeer or something else equally random.
You don’t have any data at all behind your Tebow points, other than your assertion that everyone thinks every move outside of Tebow was a mistake… and then you later disagree with that assertion anyway… and then you talk about Citizen Kane more… man, I gotta close the laptop, I just spent five minutes on this.
probably because
D’Artagnan never got fired for cheating, that may explain the absence of 4th Musketeer comparisons
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 12:48 PM MDT up reply actions
Good article Ian...
…you confused me at time, but I agree with the overall message. It’s so easy to judge with insight.
But I remember when McD would make a trade, I would usually think it was a good trade. Not knowing what the future was going to bring, I thought we had got good to excellent compensations for those guys. With maybe the exception of Tony Scheffler because we didn’t get much for him, but he wasn’t seen as a huge lost anyway.
In fact, I was curious about what people thought about the trades when they actually happened, so I want back to all the original post from John Bena on trade day and found that most people were thinking just like me. Over 70% thought the Broncos won in the Cutler deal and 68% about the Marshall deal. As for Peyton Hillis, most of you that commented said it was a “no risk trade”. I’m not making this out, this is our (we broncos fan) comments. Our reaction when it happened.
2 years later, it’s very easy to judge and say how McD just cleaned the house. But I personally think he work hard to make this team better (had his vision) and everytime he made a trade, he was going that way. It didn’t turn out the way we wanted and now it’s time to move on. We have the same hopes with the new staff and if you think Elway is the savior (again), don’t forget that McD opened the door to Elway to come back…remember that game against the Chief? Well…the first one anyway…
That said, as I was reading older posts and comments, I found a comment from scottwchicago written after the Jay Cutler’s deal:
“Denver may have to waste more than 3 draft picks to find a decent QB……. It is a lot harder to find a superbowl type QB than any other position period!”
He was right on that. 3 drafts pick is what it took just to get Tebow…hopefully we don’t need to use anymore.
by macklure on Jun 13, 2011 12:16 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Four Draft Picks were used to draft Tim Tebow.
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 13, 2011 12:39 PM MDT up reply actions
Nah. We didn't have to give a 1st rd for Tebow.
We traded up from the 2nd Rd with 3rd and 4th Rd picks. however, we did trade a 1st (after trading down twice) and a 4th (which we received from one of the trade) to get Thomas.
So are you counting the 1st round pick
that Josh McDaniels eventually used on Tim Tebow?
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 14, 2011 8:52 AM MDT up reply actions
We traded a 2nd, 3rd and 4th for the 1st so it was 3 picks.
You can’t count the pick you acquired for the 3 as an additional pick,
"as in football so in life"
Are you sure?
Josh McDaniels still had to use a 1st round draft pick on Tim Tebow, no matter how he acquired that 1st round pick. Seems like four draft picks to me.
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 14, 2011 10:24 AM MDT up reply actions
Your math sucks. We would have had three picks. We traded away 3 to get 1.
that said, the dumb part wasn’t trading up for Tebow. It was trading up for Tebow when we just could have selected Tim instead of D Thomas. We’d have saved ourselves a 2nd, 3rd and 2 4th rounders by doing that.
Remember, we wasted the Aaron Hernandez pick to jump from 24 to 22 to pick DT. Boy was that dumb and wasteful.
Bilicheat was good at bending Josh over and having his way with young McD. Bill had his way with McD a few months later on the Maroney deal. Did the same the year before with LeKevin Smith and Hoch.
The Lockout bores me.
still, 2 of the 3 we used were aquired in trades down so in essence we only used one pick for him (not including the 1st we selected him with)..
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions
As has been said before
Wade Phillips is no longer the worst coach the Broncos ever had. I think McDaniels will be a good head coach. I will never trust him not to be a cheater. I am glad he is gone.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
by Sean in Pa. on Jun 13, 2011 12:26 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Just something to note
McDaniels didn’t order or view the video tape, it was done without his knowledge. He was fined because he didn’t report the incident as soon as it happened.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Jun 13, 2011 12:37 PM MDT up reply actions
I understand that Max
and to me, not reporting it and suspending his own employee is just to iffy of a situation. There is no room in professional sports for reasonable doubt. He should have made damn sure there was no question of the teams stance on filming other teams practice.
If he had simply suspended the employee for a mistake, and turned the tape over to the NFL right away, he would likely still have my support.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
by Sean in Pa. on Jun 13, 2011 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions
But that employee was his good buddy and McD placed loyalty over ethical conduct. One more reason not to like the man.
The Lockout bores me.
Passing Genius with no Check or Balance in place
The man understood the passing aspect of the game better than anyone else I’ve ever seen.
He had no idea how to balance it with a Run Game or defense but he could create a pass happy offense.
I think if someone would have given him a little less control or acted as a balance to all of his decisions, he could have been very successful. Now I don’t know if he didn’t have the support cast to offer him advise or he did have it and didn’t heed them due to arrogance etc. My personal opinion is the latter, atleast based on siezing control of defense from Nolan and eventually parting ways with him. And the way he took a great running scheme\OL and demolished it despite having some great coaches on staff.
Passing what?
Is it possible that a passing genius handpicked Brady Quinn, Chris Simms and Tom Brandstater to be QB’s for the Denver Broncos? I really don’t think so. A good QB coach simply cannot know how to evaluate QB talent if he puts those three guys on the team and then has the nerve to pay them money. It’s impossible. He would have been better off bringing in Kerry Collins, Mark Brunell or Jeff Garcia. Heck, he could have brought in Andy Garcia and that would have made more sense than Simms and Quinn.
The Josh McDaniels era was Horrible, laughable and sad all at the same time.
Josh McDaniels was more like a passing….. nightmare.
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 13, 2011 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions
i don't really think thats fair
Simms showed flashes pre-injury, I thought he was worth the risk when we acquired him.
Quinn was coached by Weiss who used a similar system to McDaniels and had success at ND. So again a deal that made sense. (even though Hillis was involved in the trade – but like I said McD had no clue about running so he didn’t know how to evaluate Hillis)
Brandstater was a late round pick that never really had an opportunity to prove anyting.
Besides he got quite a bit of production out of Quinn, Cassel and Brady.
They were all bad acquisitions
for a QB guru to make and Josh McDaniels has not taken enough heat for them. They have caused me to further question Josh McDaniels knowledge of offense and QB’s.
Next point. Wouldn’t you think that a great QB coach would be able to teach these three guys to be at least good QB’s if not so good that they would be able to challenge for the starting job in Denver if not be so attractive to other teams that they were willing to trade draft picks to acquire them?
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 14, 2011 10:32 AM MDT up reply actions
He didn't have to teach them to be great
Once Orton won the starting position, they just had to be serviceable backups. We only got see them in limited backup playing time and preseason. Playing time is very different than practice, and they definitely choked when called, but so has many other players at many other positions. But they could have played well in practice etc.
Don’t get me wrong I didn’t really like Simms (I am a longhorn but I hate his father) but I don’t think we has acquired to be “the guy”, Orton was.
I also didn’t really like Quinn, but at the time it made sense to me due to the Weiss connection. Have you considered McD spoke to Weiss prior to the trade and trusted his opinion?
I have no real opinion on Tom B. he was low risk low reward, cant fault any coach for taking a tall “smart” player.
My question is what other backup could we have had? Van Pelt wasn’t great for shanny…
I agree not all his QB picks were good but you also have to attribute some blame on the player as well.
It’s not like every player he’s working with are mature, hardworking, diligent, super talented leaders. Not all players are the same and ultimately some blame falls on them as well for either not doing everything right or not being good or healthy enough.
Maybe the criteria fits on paper but on the field it’s a different story?
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 1:01 PM MDT up reply actions
Well
if McDaniels was angry he got caught instead of actually feeling contrition for the wrong he did, he will not change. Nevertheless, everyone deserves a second chance and we’ll see how he does with the Rams. Oddly enough, he is in the STL after the Patriots reportedly cheated to beat the Rams in their first Super Bowl. Irony has a great sense of humor! I’m just glad my Dallas Mavericks are NBA champions, let’s see this happen for the Broncos now!
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 12:45 PM MDT reply actions
mavs
are the champs hopeflly cuban can keep that team toether
okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider
Coordinators
Wade would be a good defensive coor, McD a god offensive coordinator
Mavericks
Congrats on the Championship Bradfather, What a great series, can’t think of a better one
What if....
The hiring of McD was Divine Intervention that ensured Tim Tebow became a Bronco?
:) j/k
Verbose in style, dispersion of thought, procrastination in life.
The artist formerly known as ZAPPA
lol
We live in an age when instant gratification isn't fast enough
by Brian Shrout on Jun 13, 2011 1:16 PM MDT up reply actions
I liked McD as well.
If it wasn’t for filming the walk through thing I don’t believe he wouldn’t been fired. I would’ve given him atleast a year or two more. If Tebow was ever going to be a good QB I think we kicked his best chance out the door by firing McD
I too....really liked McD.
The guy obviously has been taught valuable lesson after valuable lesson from one of the best coaches of our time….and please don’t talk to me about taping, because that is another post altogether. He was a rookie coach and for us to have such high expectations from a ROOKIE coach in the draft is absolutely ridiculous. I think McD was a great coach, and prepared the players very well. My thing about his tenure…was that there was no improvement over time at all. It just kept getting worse and worse….The losses, and the bigger losses. If there had been a glimmer of improvement and McDaniels was still here I would be backing him right now. That being said…I think Kyle Orton is NOT as good a quarterback as some might think. First ..it takes leadership skills to be a QB, and Kyle Orton has none of that whatsoever. Second…as soon as a play doesn’t go his way, or it seems like we might lose the game…Kyle Orton folds like cheap tent in 5 MPH winds. Every single time, and that more than anything is why he sucks. Yards all day…so what. Get it in the end-zone for crying out loud.
Bronco Champions are being forged as we speak.
by BroncoRick69 on Jun 13, 2011 6:13 PM MDT up reply actions
The most controversial post of the off-season
…..thus far.
Some of you already know that I think Josh McDaniels is battling an inner demon that makes him open his mouth and say things that cause bad results for the Denver Broncos. I’m sure you’ve seen photos and press conferences of him trying so hard to keep his little trap shut that his lips and face turn white. Well in this shot he has both his eyes and trap shut. What do you think that little demon was telling him to do?

When I awaken
from my slumber, I will be a good head coach, I will be a good head coach. Dang, I hope this self-hypnosis crap works
Brad James
Follow me on Twitter
With Coach Zorro on our side, we will slice opponents to ribbons. Tim Tebow gives me hope and I already have faith and charity in my heart! I see a propitious future rife with Lombardis for our Broncos!
by the new Bradfather on Jun 13, 2011 4:59 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Must...resist....urge...to...trade.....Clady
No no Josh. He’s All-Pro. Bad Idea. Don’t even consider it.
but DAMN! I really want Jeff Backus and a 4th rounder. I could rebuild the O-line.
No No! Shake it off! Quit thinking about it! think about boobs instead.
Like Nelly says,
ITS ONLY JUST A DREEEAAAAM!!!
"Undo" ~ Rush of Fools
Good one
but Clady was still mysteriously lost for the season and Eddie Royal never saw the field because he wasn’t as smart as Wes Welker.
Very interesting.
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 14, 2011 1:25 PM MDT up reply actions
If you look closey at that photo you'll see the guy we hired
and the guy we SHOULD of hired behind him.
"Undo" ~ Rush of Fools
Uh, I remember a ton of criticism of the Tebow pick when it happened. I was one of the people against it.
But just because he has now won over most of his detractors on this site doesn’t mean it wasn’t a criticized move of the McD era.
I’m actually surprised this post got 9 recs. It’s good writing, but if you look back last year you will find a lot of anti-Tebow posts as well as pro-Tebow ones. I’m not sure this defense of McD is necessary or what the point of it is.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
I'm not even sure this was a defense of McD much less what it's point was.
"as in football so in life"
McDaniels, in 2 short years, set this franchise back 10.
I am so happy the little cancer is gone. I would like to erase the last 2 years from my memory. I hate Josh McDaniels and will forever. If I had the chance I’d punch him in his smug, grinning face.
by RockCzar on Jun 13, 2011 5:45 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
You can’t set a franchise back that far in a salary cap era unless you trade away a franchise QB. Cutler is no franchise QB. One or two good drafts and Denver can be right back to where Denver was at the end of 2008.
McD certainly set us back and made us worse, but it’s not like we were very good at the end of 2008.
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 13, 2011 7:41 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
i drive u
to ST Louis rock lol
okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider
I too am having trouble figuring out your overall point
I appreciate the work and good writing but I’m not entirely sure what you are asking us to do or think. Like you, I’m also a McDaniel’s fan. I understand in hindsight his struggles with drafting, personnel, and most importantly winning football games, but I did think he was getting the Broncos onto the right track. Unfortunately we will never know what the case may have been and since he’s moved on, so have I. I wish him the best of luck in St. Louis and look forward to seeing what he is able to accomplish with Sam Bradford.
However, I’m also a Tebow fan. I don’t think that Tebow is a great player because McDaniel’s drafted him. I don’t think anything about Tebow in regards to McDaniels. Two separate people, two separate fates. No doubt on this blog you will see a predominate opinion against McD. It might on a good day be considered anger, and on every other day hatred. He was the face of this franchise when we were at our winningest worse. It’s not hard to understand how that went down. McDaniel’s will always be, like Belichick in Cleveland, nothing more than a what if debate.
I really got lost here:
Let Richard Quinn be the greatest third tackle in the history of the NFL and Knowshon Moreno run for 2,000 yards and Robert Ayers sack a quarterback ten times in a season… Darcel McBath become the next Brian Dawkins, Perrish Cox, the next Champ Bailey… Let it all happen, because if it doesn’t then my dear friends there is no reason at all to feel like McDaniels was correct in drafting Tebow.
I feel like the meat of your point is buried somewhere in this. However, if all of those things did happen… and Tebow failed… they would still have absolutely nothing to do with Tim Tebow. The success of McDaniel’s individual draft choices rests on those individuals… not on the success of the individuals around him.
Tebow will be successful if Tebow can go out there and perform. That’s it. It has nothing to do with McDaniel’s anymore. McDaniel’s is the past… and the tough past. Tebow is part of the future and the future is always brighter. Being a fan of Tebow doesn’t mean anything in the McDaniel’s conversation anymore. Nor should Tebow’s future success or failure validate any side’s argument in regards to the McDaniel’s debate.
When it comes to McDaniels… haters gonna hate. That ship has sailed.
There’s still hope for many of the rest of McD’s old draft classes.
GB2
Tulogit to quit.
I’ve been aboard that hate boat since day one. It was a rough ride, but we knew where we were headed and that we’d get there quickly.
I still maintain that McD is fools gold. Lots of flash, but no real substance. Think it will prove out in St Louis.
The Lockout bores me.
Josh McDaniels will be fine
in StL. He will once again be the OC of a team with a great young and proven QB and will receive too much credit for the QB’s success and the teams success.
His only hope to be a good HC one day is to learn from Steve Spagnuolo, grow up, swallow his pride, hire a good DC, hire a good GM, let his wife have sex with star players and ship that inner demon back to N.E.
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 14, 2011 1:36 PM MDT up reply actions
you lost me at the jump..... Drafting TT may be the most criticized move by McD
Every single move McDaniels made has been criticized ad nauseum by fans of the Denver Broncos.
Except one:
Tim Tebow.
I skipped to the bottom to call BS.
Hated that pick.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. DA
I am over this.....time to talk about our current team.
Floyd Little: HOF Class of 2010.
2009-10 back-to-back NBA Champions L.A Lakers
2009-10 NBA Finals MVP Kobe Bryant
Nice strawman you have out there, troll
In general, MHR fans do not hate ALL McD decisions. Cutler trade split the fanbase, but now seen by most as a win for Broncos. Marshall trade was not even THAT controversial and again majority of fans approves of it now. Really, Marshall did not even do as well as Lloyd last year. So this:
Every single move McDaniels made has been criticized ad nauseum by fans of the Denver Broncos. Except one
This ^ is simply not true. After that, the rest of the post is so much trolling for attention.
by si_ice on Jun 13, 2011 8:26 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I didn’t think he was trollilng, but he sure does need to work on his game if he is going to get front page status. This article needed a lot of editing that it never got.
The Lockout bores me.
Editing where?
I enjoyed his writing style.
I’ve been keeping away from MHR because every single article that hit the front page seemed to be the exact same thing after another.
“Here are some stats and some more stats and this is what that means.”
Get’s repetitive and annoying after a while. Especially when there is no football on.
I thought he did an excellent job and has a unique writing style. I see a lot of people the writing just sailed over their heads from these comments I’m reading.
He also brings up a good point, many people claim to say that McD was the worst thing to happen to the Broncos yet completely ignore that he drafted Tebow and believe that Tebow is the greatest gift to Denver from God.
He is either a martyr or a villain as the article suggest.
Rec’d for catching my attention and reading something fresh.
Any movement in history which attempts to perpetuate itself, becomes reactionary.
- Marshal Broz Tito
by BosnianBronco on Jun 14, 2011 2:48 AM MDT up reply actions
McD supporters such as yourself always steer the argument towards Tebow or Lloyd or trading BM. You’ll never want to discuss the running game woes, the failed 3-4, Champ putting McD on blast, the lack of development on several 2009 draft picks, Xanders putting McD on blast, the blowouts, the mental lapses, Spygate II, the regression of the Broncos from early 2009 thru 2010. Just re-focus on Lloyd, Tebow and trading BM because those were clearly good moves that took balls and brains. I agree, so McD went 5 for 23 on his biggest roster and coaching moves. WOW!
The truth lies in-between, but much closer to the negative view on the man. MHR has always been a place that supported McD more than it should have and until the very bitter end. This guy claiming that McD got unfair treatment at MHR is a joke. McD was coddled at MHR far more than he should have been or deserved.
I agree that you get repetition in the off-season, but there are no new stories so you have to write silliness like Top 100 player lists.
Or you can go the Ian Henson route, make up a silly straw man and tear him down with poor usage of metaphor and sarcasm. I prefer the former even if I’m not excited about it either.
The Lockout bores me.
Bad drafters can make good picks. Shanny picked Dumervil did he not?
People criticized Shanny at the end regardless of whether or not he left us with one of the league’s best pass rushers. The point is that he missed more than he hit and that is what got him criticism.
McD deserves all of his criticism but I am glad he picked Tebow (although I hated it at the time). I’m still glad he’s gone and I’m not going to defend him because he made a few less good decisions than bad ones.
This post is just calling out the people who love Tebow but hate McD. It seems like someone just trying to pick a fight when it has absolutely no merit.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 14, 2011 6:17 AM MDT up reply actions
I agree
it was probably a big mistake in drafting Tebow…I didn’t want Tebow either, I actually cried when we drafted him because I knew the turmoil and stress Tebow would put on the organization regardless of his success. However, McDaniels would not have turned Tebow into a magical horse. McDaniels was handed Tom Brady and then he did a great job with Matt Cassell. Doesn’t mean the guy can work miracles. McDaniels had done a great job of stockipiling picks maneuvering in that first round. And then he made two mistakes, drafting an injured WR and a project QB, something you don’t use 2 first round picks on let alone trade up to get one. It was a great opportunity to rebuild a defense but he neglected to do that and pretty much booked his ticket out of Denver in doing so.
A baseball park is the one place where a man's wife doesn't mind his getting excited over somebody else's curves
by waterboy31321 on Jun 14, 2011 8:27 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Tebow will be the only good thing McD did for the Broncos
people forget that it was the cheating scandal that got McD fired not his decision making. He embarrassed the Denver Broncos Organization and he was fired shortly after.
No save ammunition all bullets in gun now- Bruce Campbell
Stand up straight a man looks more confident when he is erect- Taj
GO BRONCOS
Its a big stretch
Its a big stretch to hail McDaniel’s Quarterback coaching prowess and then knock him for drafting Tebow!
He also picked the great Orton which you seem to like so too.
What I find funny is how so many like you call McD a quarterback coaching genius! Whats funny is he gets credit for coaching Tom Brady during his 3rd Superbowl run……. I guess Brady wasn’t good enough when he won the two prior to McDaniels becoming the Quarterbacks coach??? And Cassel was a career backup who had a TON of time to learn behind not only Tom Brady, but two Heisman Trophy winners as well! Any coach on that team would have done well with Cassel during Brady’s injury.
That's the contradiction I keep talking about
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
Really. How?
How is it a contradiction? Do you really believe your BS “. Either McD knew what he was doing or he didn’t.”
Know one on the planet can claim they always new what they were doing! Whatever….
I didn’t say Tebow is the best and I didn’t say McDaniels was the worst, or vise versa.
I just find it odd that McDaniels gets so much credit for being a “great” Quarterback coach when in-fact he was already coaching a “Great” Quarterback going for a 3rd SuperBowl. How can anyone give credit to McDaniels for Tom Brady’s success. It baffles me.
I do think McDaniels has a good eye for quarterbacks and thats why I made my statement that he also picked Orton.
But I don’t see were I’m being contradictive? I’m not saying anything bad about either one of them….
uh I think he was agreeing with you dude.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 14, 2011 4:45 PM MDT up reply actions
Yeah I was.
Lol
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
Lol
No worries. It is a touchy subject.
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
McD
had to go he shouild have kept the 4-3 he pass way too much and was too simple to gameplan against not that J fox is m martz but he knows how to comete 11 might be a down year but if tebow keeps getting better and we can build a D by 13 we will win the AFC West
okay i have cerebral palsy arthris and chronic fatigue as well i have a great life and loveing folks some days are better than other days i got a make-a-wish in 2001 and saw my favorite team the broncos it was the trip of a lifetime i wish everyone couild have gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that okay but i bleed organ and bule for my mnr fans but i bleed orange and blue denver will rise again resident broncos fan for every blog resident broncos for stampede bule thanks shvd98z24 real name jeremy woodard nettleton high class of 02 yes i am a raider
Ian
I don’t really have time to go through the 200+ comments to see if this has been said but I agree with you. I think McD was a good coach and made some good moves (although a lot of his good moves were negated by the shocker that brought Brady Quinn in). I think he will be a good head coach but it became obvious towards the end that it wouldn’t be in Denver.
The one thing that irks me most? If McDaniels would’ve come into the organisation this year with Elway and a stronger front office who would’ve been able to say No to him with the support of the owner then I wonder if he’d have been better.
by mikebirty on Jun 15, 2011 1:32 AM MDT reply actions 2 recs
Nice point Mike
McD would have almost certainly been more successful with the current FO structure. I’m still not too sure about his actual coaching strategies and ability to coach / motivate the team but we would have certainly avoided many of the personnel mistakes that were made.
"as in football so in life"
Elway and McDaniels
would not work well together.
Josh McDaniels made it painfully obvious that he wanted to surround himself with yes-men.
John Elway is not a yes-man.
Quit giving Josh McDaniels so much damn credit.
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 15, 2011 9:35 AM MDT up reply actions
That's pure speculation both ways
I don’t think Mike’s giving McD too much “damn credit”. If the current FO had been in place and offered McD the HC position (his first) and said you’re the coach but we work as a team for all personnel decisions I’m not so sure that he would have turned it down so he could surround himself with yes men. IMO the sad truth is that Bowlen / Ellis allowed McD to become a victim of the circumstances and McD was too young and ego driven to ask for help.
"as in football so in life"
by asinsoin on Jun 15, 2011 10:10 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
I agree completely with this.
More what if, but I think McD has/had potential.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
by Sean in Pa. on Jun 15, 2011 10:18 AM MDT up reply actions
Not a what if....
the current FO would NEVER have hired Josh McDaniels because he was not what the Denver Broncos needed at the time and that is in no way debatable. Period. Not open for discussion, not open for spinning and not open for twisting.
Now folks can debate all they want about what happened after Josh McDaniels became the HC of the Broncos but there is no doubt that he was the wrong guy to better and lead the 2008 Broncos team to a successful future.
I have thrown Pat Bowlen under the 18 wheeler along with Josh McDaniels from the very first second that I heard the dreadful news on 1-11 but people here are being way too hard on the FO and not casting enough blame on Josh McDaniels. It’s wrong and needs to stop. I’m tired (have been tired) of folks giving us the poor ol’Josh bit, it’s even more tired than I am right now. Speaking of tired, wake up people! Josh McDaniels was a disaster. The worst thing to ever happen to our beloved Denver Broncos.
Jog my memory, when was Josh McDaniels hired and when was Brian Xanders promoted?
by KoloradoKaos on Jun 15, 2011 3:41 PM MDT up reply actions
Glad you have such amazing insight into the mind of Elway.
Of course hindsight is always 20/20 eh? You may very well be right but to claim such a definitive position is interesting to say the least.
"as in football so in life"
Let's not forget that Josh could have also said no to the job had Elway been on board. He may have
had a certain atmosphere in mind for his first coaching job and as I recall his vision for what he wanted to do was pretty explicit and pretty involved. He may have turned us down if he didn’t get the power he wanted to implement his vision. He did turn down a few coordinator jobs to pick St. Louis. Most likely because it gave him more freedom to run the offense his way.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 1:05 PM MDT up reply actions
He's Controlling like Stalin was.
I agree, everything had to be his way.
SPORTS-GLORY.com
by Sports-Glory on Jun 15, 2011 10:46 AM MDT up reply actions
or Shanny or Parcells or Belicheck or Lombardi
or countless other highly successful, superbowl winning HCs.
Saying McD was controlling was a problem is idiotic hindsight. It was a problem because the whole thing (luck, injuries, fan/media hysteria, poor context created by Shanny/Ellis/Bowlen) didn’t work out, not because it was a flaw in McD.
He wasn't ready to use that power and didn't use it well. He made good decisons and bad ones
but he was overwhelmed. He had his hand in too much and couldn’t bring it together. It was too much to give him too soon. I don’t believe Shanny or Parcells had full power in their first HC gig. I may be wrong. Even BB proved that for a first go around it is sometimes too much to be ready for. Just look at his stint in Cleveland. At least he learned from it. Hopefully McD will learn from it too when he gets another go.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 5:55 PM MDT up reply actions
While I agree to an extent
McDaniels did show flaws. Too many of them in my opinion. I do think he will learn from his mistakes, he is a smart man but I am afraid I would be unhappy with him in the long run for his secrecy and his willingness to cover up problems. A big issue was with his handling of injuries and information about them.
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
McD’s short comings in hiring were two fold.
Most importantly, he hasn’t been in the NFL long enough to establish relationships with position coaches and coordinators. He doesn’t know enough guys to hire the right guys.
Secondly, he was very comfortable surrounding himself with cronies.
It was a nasty combination that resulted in the Spying incident, the retention of Priefer after our disgraceful ST showing in 2009, the falling out with Nolan, the promotion of Wink to DC and the promotion of his brother. Of all those moves, only one worked out (surprisingly – his brother). Wink isn’t talented enough to be a D coordinator, Priefer sucks something awful, Nolan was missed and McD’s buddy in the video department got Josh fired.
The worst thing to ever happen to the Broncos was Darrent Williams murder, but the worst organizational thing to ever happen to the Broncos was hiring McD to be the coach and GM. Gotta blame Ellis and Bowlen for that. At least they fired him quickly considering his contract.
The Lockout bores me.
by McGeorge on Jun 16, 2011 10:48 AM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
McD made 2 clear personnel mistakes
Hillis and Phons… three if you count passing on Clay Mathews, but since he was the best player in that draft and looks to be HOF-caliber, you could say the same for everyother team that passed on Mathews too… it was far from a clear mistake given available info at the time (hindsight is 20-20).
Everything else I think was either bad luck or has proven to be at least a defensible decision.
Cutler deal… Orton plus picks far exceeds Cutler’s value. Cutler is better than Orton… but not that much better and Orton was more coachable and cheaper to boot.
Marshall deal… not having to pay Marshall big money was the right call given our other options at WR, and getting multiple high picks in addition was a total coup.
DT… looked unstoppable when healthy. McBath is the same. But injuries happen. 50% of draft choices don’t workout for one reason or another. Deal with it. These aren’t mistakes, and McD’s draft success looks average, perhaps great if folks can stay healthy and TT pans out.
Veteran defensive players?… We had enough holes that we had to use FAs somewhere, and we’ll never know how his draft in 2011 would’ve looked, when there was lots of DEF talent that he could’ve paired with a relatively young offensive core… If Doom/Goodman stayed healthy and we had some semblance of passrush last year, things might’ve looked very different as we come out of an 8-8-ish season with high potential going forward.
Spygate2 was a embarrasment to the team locally, but it was a total non-issue nationally. I was out of the country when it happened, and had I not followed MHR, I never would’ve known it happened when I returned to my home in WashDC the following week. From the outside Denver perspective, it looked like he basically handled it correctly (and there is no proof he was culpable at all). Had the season been a winning one and media scruitiny not so intense (due to previously controversial moves like Cutler/Marshall and Patriot connections), no one would care.
Losing Nolan hurt, but D-Coords and HCs seperate all the time. Its unclear to me that Nolan would’ve done much better with our weak passrush and other injuries than Wink did. Nolan’s a good DC, but the HC has to call the shots. If they aren’t on the same page, the DC has to go. You can possibly fault McD for not getting someone better than Wink (but who was available), but not for losing Nolan.
When you add up the bad injury luck, close early losses, the resulting poor season, and the media circus/fan hysteria on the controversial decisions (most of which were good), I actually agree McD had to go… he just wasn’t in a tenable position to succeed, even though I think he was making more right decisions than wrong ones.
Given the good decisions he did make, I think it is hard to guess eitherway whether TT will be a good or bad call. To me TT seemed like good value where we got him… We got a high-risk of busting player that has HOF-potential…. that sounds like its worth a late 1st rounder given a good but not great starter (Orton) already on the roster, and that is what we paid for him… whether TT busts or not is irrelevant to whether taking him was a good decision at the time.
Very nice write up
Very balanced and good break downs.
McDaniels suffers from the same affliction Cutler does. He learned it from big Bill, a complete lack of stage presence while not saying anything. He just wasn’t likable !
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
you make a lot of good and valid points but it McD was just as much to blame for his poor coaching as well as luck.
He couldn’t bring his vision together and it wasn’t just luck that stopped it from happening. He promoted Barone into a position he was terrible at (OL-coach), he promoted Wink to DC because that way he could have his hands in it which was the opposite of how it was with Nolan.
He also had a clashing personality which was evident with Nolan and which some of the players echoed after he left.
I agree that he had a run of bad luck but it sounds like you are giving him much more credit than he deserves.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
sorry, that was supposed to be a response to cjfarls
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 5:59 PM MDT up reply actions
Do you really know his intentions?
Funny how the personality clashes came with the losses. Other than the trouble makers, early on he had the team leaders support. We don’t really know what he was trying to accomplish or what his motivations were. Despite the insistence of some on here that McD had complete control while Ellis and Bowlen were out to lunch I would bet the heat was coming down well before last season started and much of what happened could be blamed on stress and inexperience.
I am done with him and glad he is gone but I feel the same about him as many players. We can scream about lack of effort, or stupid decisions but none of us are there and we should be careful about deciding we know.
ok, wow… got that off my chest
/rant
Opinions are like......, Well anyway, this is mine.
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't defending him. I agree that his lack of experience showed through during the tough times.
As far as his intentions, it was made pretty clear by Ellis, Xanders and McD himself in several press conferences what his vision was and how he was going to go about it. As far as personality clashes go, you’re right, they come with losses, but there are other coaches who don’t really clash with players/other coaches when the losses mount (see John Fox). We saw how he acted on the sidelines and when team leaders speak out against his personality after he was let go (Lloyd) then that also speaks to the type of personality he has. Some personalities just work differently than others and some are more effective at communicating than others.
Like you though I am glad he’s gone.
Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.
by BroncoMath101 on Jun 16, 2011 10:21 PM MDT up reply actions

by 






































