Some Clarification is in Order: Offensive Trends Review
Happy Independence Day to Americans, and a happy regular 4th of July to everyone else!
So with the two parts of the offense covered, passing and rushing, which covered a lot of topics. This third and final part covering the offense will review what the past two articles have discussed, ranging from the changes in yards per attempt from quarterbacks to the increase in 1,000 yard rushers to the increased efficiency of both quarterbacks and running backs. We will also be talking about and covering some odds and ends topics that I didn't get the chance to talk about before, .
After covering the offense in these past three articles, we will be covering the defense next time and the special teams unit. So with the future parts laid out, lets get to this last part reviewing the offense trends in the NFL.
Passing Summery:
- We saw a trend in the passing game to become more accurate while changing from deep passes to shorter passes.
- With these shorter passes, offensive coordinators are targeting larger receivers, or those who can move quick, creating separation across the middle. Yards after the catch are becoming increasingly important.
- While there was a trending up of yards per season since the rule changes began in 1978, the average yards per season for a team has leveled out in the past two decades, with only a slight increase in recent years. Attempts follow a similar trend, but have risen at a slightly more rapid rate, but from a percentage view point, the passing game remains at the same level in relation to the overall offense.
- With this leveling out of average yards per season for a team, quarterbacks and offensive coordinators seem to be focusing on tightening up the game plans. Quarterbacks are more efficient, completing more passes on short routes, making fewer mistakes, causing fewer turnovers, succeeding on 3rd downs more, and scoring more points.
Rushing Summery:
- Like the passing game, the running game has become more efficient, increasing yards per rush, and lower fumbles. This change in the rushing game comes from a few different factors.
- The first is that running backs are being used in tandem more now than any other time. There have been more tandem backs reaching 800, 900 and 1,000 yards each with each passing season. Coaches want to keep their premier backs healthy. Jamaal Charles (Thomas Jones), Adrian Peterson (Toby Gerhart), DeAngelo Williams (Jonathan Stewart and Mike Goodson), LeGarrett Blunt (Cadillac Williams), Michael Turner (Jason Snelling), Marshawn Lynch (Justin Forsett), Ryan Mathews (Mike Tolbert), Darren McFadden (Michael Bush), Ray Rice (Willis McGahee), Ronnie Brown (Ricky Williams), LT (Shonne Greene), Ahmad Bradshaw (Brandon Jacobs), Felix Jones (Marion Barber and Tashard Choice), Joseph Addai (Donald Brown), Pierre Thomas (Reggie Bush, Chris Ivory, Julius Jones). This level of tandem backs is not seen at any point in NFL and it isn't a fluke, it has been going up for a decade, and that makes it a trend.
- Now that's not to say the level of talent is going down. There are still top tier backs, look at Jamaal Charles, Adrian Peterson, these guys are unbelievable backs, their coaches just want them to have long careers, so they bring in other backs of talent to compliment the backs they have.
- Overall the running game isn't weakening, while it is much weaker than it was in the 1970's and 1980's it has balanced out, and rather than continuing to weakening, it is evolving into it's current role, taking advantage of a stronger passing game, thus strengthening the running game.
- The Running backs draft strength is weakening, and while 1st and 2nd round running backs are still the safest picks, talent can be found more and more often in mid rounds.
Odds and Ends:
- One key thing to note, and that will be discussed in the defensive trends piece, is that the number of offensive plays is going down. Now this is very interesting to take notice of because if you look above, you see the offense is being more successful, more passing yards, stable rushing yards, more yards overall, more points per game, and yet they are doing it with fewer plays. This is something to keep in mind for the next article, the offense is succeeding more with less plays, and defenses seem to be struggling league wide.
- The biggest one I wanted look at was something that had been discussed with a few other people, was looking at if mobile QB's have become more prevalent in the NFL. Now this was a tricky thing to research, and there is no easy or perfect way to study it, but I think I found a decent way to look at this. Now I won't be looking so much at the individual number of mobile QB's, rather I will be looking at the success rate of mobile QB's. If more mobile QB's perferate the NFL, they will succeed more and more often, if there is no trend towards mobile QB's, there won't be very much success. So lets take a closer look at this below:
Types of Quarterbacks:
Now it is important to note that it is difficult to define the word "mobile." I did a post some time ago looking at the term, here is the link. Based on my research, I set the parameters of my search to include all quarterbacks from 1978 to 2010 that threw for over 2,500 yards as well as rushed for 250 yards. This would eliminate quarterbacks who weren't starting quarterbacks but ran purely as option quarterbacks, these were popular in the 1990's, and would also include quarterbacks that ran often enough to be fleet of foot, but didn't exclude larger, mobile quarterbacks.
It is important this isn't the most accurate way to judge a quarterback to see if he is mobile, but it is the only logistical way to do it. For informational purposes, the best way to judge a quarterback is too look at his pass to run attempts ratio, but there is no feasible way to do that for an extended period of time. So if there are questions you have about a specific quarterback, please let me know, I will look it up and hopefully be able to answer your question.
So with those parameters in mind, I looked at quarterbacks that were broken into three categories, less than eight pass attempts per run, these are the really mobile quarterbacks, 8 to 13 pass attempts to runs, balanced quarterbacks who can run or throw, and 14+ pass attempts to run, pocket passers. Now the categories I will be judging these players in will be Pro Bowls and which quarterback wins the Super Bowl that year. By looking at these two categories, we can see if more mobile quarterbacks are leading successful teams as well as see if more are seeing personal success. Now I know it's not perfect, and it is important to remember that quarterbacks can move up and down categories each year, so one year they may be in the 8-13 section but the next they may be 14+. Also, I was going to include All-Pro into this list, but only three non-14+ quarterbacks made All Pro's, Steve Young, Daunte Culpepper and Randall Cunningham.
With that in mind, here is the table:
| Year | ≤ 7 Pro Bowls | ≤ 7 Super Bowls | 8-13 Pro Bowls | 8-13 Super Bowls | 14+ Pro Bowls | 14+ Super Bowls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1978 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 1980 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 1982 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 1983 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 1984 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 1986 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| 1987 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| 1988 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1989 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 1991 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| 1992 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 1993 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| 1996 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| 2000 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| 2001 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2002 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| 2003 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| 2004 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| 2010 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Total: | 36 | 3 | 85 | 17 | 96 | 13 |
| Average: | 1.1 | 0.09 | 2.6 | 0.52 | 2.9 | 0.39 |
This is where it gets a bit trickier to track because the charts don't come out so pretty for the visual learners in the group, but I got it worked out. I will make a few key points that need to be understood before we look at these charts. The first is that the number of Pro Bowl players has increased rapidly in the last 15 years, especially in the past two, with Super Bowl players not participating in the Pro Bowl, allowing others to get the chance. Because of this, there is a sort of inflation when it comes to Pro Bowls, so keep that in mind, I will discuss it more after the charts.
The second point, that I won't show with charts, is about Super Bowls. Now it doesn't look pretty in chart form, so I will just discuss it. Aaron Rodgers was the 3rd quarterback with less than eight passes to one run to win a Super Bowl, the other two being Steve Young and Jim McMahon. There is almost no growth in that area. Interestingly, the 8-13 section is ahead of 14+, but they both has sustainable levels of success, no change, they are almost even. In the past ten years, < 8 has won 1, 8-13 has won 5 and 14+ has won 4. So in terms of Super Bowl quarterbacks, there is no trend towards overly mobile quarterbacks, while balanced and pocket passers remain the main quarterbacks of the Super Bowl.
So lets get to the Pro Bowl review:
Less Than Eight Group
Eight to Thirteen Group
Fourteen Plus Group
All Groups
The two parallel lines are the < 8 and 14+ groups, while the slightly more level line is the 8-13 group, I'm sorry that's not more clear, I couldn't get them to color them.
So here is where it gets tricky because it looks like all three options are trending upward, but with that inflation we were talking about, you'll see a bit different story. With inflation added, the 8-13 group, the one that is solid in Super Bowl representation is trending downward in Pro Bowls while both the < 8 and 14+ groups are climbing up at the same rate. So the trend here is that while there has been growth in mobile quarterbacks rising in success, there is no trending away from pocket passers, actually it seems the opposite, both are rising in success.
Overall, there is a trend of more mobile quarterbacks in the league, while they have yet to have some success, they are on the rise. But with that in mind, there is also a rise in pocket passers as well. So even with the increase in mobile quarterbacks, the style of play isn't likely to sweep the league anytime soon.
Next time on Some Clarification is in Order: The Defense and NFL Trends
17 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great post man.
I really enjoy this series and getting a big-picture view of the game and where football is headed. That last bit about QB types and their success was quite intriguing and something my father and I seem to always end up talking about whenever we get on our football rants.
Its hard to measure what you were trying to measure, since a lot of the time those rushes could be a “pocket passer” type QB getting flushed out, rather than a designed run. But on the other hand I think that’s exactely what this data represents, as a true QB run is called up fairly rarely. Even Vick is usually taking a passing play and breaking into a run. Its just safer to call the pass and let your QB do something with the play, rather than call a designed QB run and be stuck with whatever happens.
Its almost as if the “called passing play turned QB run” is a modern version of an option play. Just instead of an option-run it’s an option-pass. I garruntee if the rules weren’t catering and protecting the passing game so much we’d see more of a college-style game in the NFL. With teams trending toward the option-runs, because it keeps the defense on their heels. I think that’s exactely what the “option-pass” does with mobile QB’s, and while there is still plenty of pie for the pure pocket passers, this is definitely a style that gives pro defenses something different to deal with.
I also think if it weren’t for the pure pocket passers continued and rising success, the mobile QB’s wouldn’t be as successful either. I think they give DC’s multiple styles to deal with, so they can’t build their defenses in just one particular way and battle one style. The same with the 4-3 and the 3-4 defense schemes. The 3-4 wouldn’t be such a successful defense if it weren’t for the fact that there are still several teams that play amazing 4-3 defenses.
Anyhow I think I’m off to ranting, but I enjoyed your artcile (articles!) and look forward to the defensive batch. Happy 4th man!
"It is better to be rougly right than precisely wrong." - John Maynard Keynes
"Excellence can be obtained; if you care more than others think is wise…risk more than others think is safe…dream more than others think is practical…expect more than others think is possible." - Anonymous Author
Thanks for your thoughts
And I agree that it is very hard to measure it, I did what I could though, and even I know it’s hardly perfect. I did put a lot of work though into the parameters though, and after a lot of trial and error to get to that number, it’s high enough to exclude quarterbacks being purely flushed out, like you suggested, but also includes rolling out on purpose, or on draws.
As for your final thoughts on why mobile QB’s are successful, you are spot on, and I will be discussing that in the next piece about the defense.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
It's funny...I would consider Elway a bit of a runner.
Didn’t he set a record for most consecutive 3000 yd passing + 200 yd rushing seasons? I guess he just barely missed your metric. :)
I'm not so sure about that record, it could be true, I have no idea
But he was in the 8-13 grouping almost his whole career, while he did run, we as fans often glamorize his runs, but they never came near being more than 9 or 10 passes to 1 run.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Elway was without either ACL by the early 1990s which turned him into a pocket passer.
The Lockout bores me.
And it really showed that he changed his style of play
Now I loved Elway in the 1980’s, but he had some major issues with his game, he was inaccurate, made a lot of mistakes, and that caused issues. When he got injured, his play changed, he got more accurate, turned the ball over less, and with a new coach, won two Super Bowls.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
We saw him run around a lot
but he ran in order to pass. He was usually trying to stay out of the clutches of the pass rushers long enough to get the ball off.
"Surprised to see you, Captain, though pleased." — from Star Trek episode Space Seed.
Very interesting
Love the last chart.(all groups). Good job. How does QB accuracy play into the comparison? Is the rise in mobile QBs because they are becoming more accurate? Some mobile QBs are more accurate on the run than they are standing in the pocket. Even Vick seems more accurate now than he used to be.
Orton, Tebow, Quinn, may the best man win!
by OrangeandBluesBros on Jul 4, 2011 7:44 PM MDT reply actions
Actually, mobile QB's were more accurate in the 1990's
That was the hay-day for those quarterbacks, with Young, Culpepper and Cunningham all being accurate and successful. Most modern mobile QB’s aren’t as accurate as balanced or pocket passers, but there are exceptions, Vick is an example, he was very inaccurate in Atlanta, but under McNabb and Reid, he altered his play style and was very accurate last season. But overall, a mobile QB is less accurate, but in the 1990’s, they were almost the same, but have regressed in the recent decade.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
I would call success a 'blend' of pocket passer style with the ability to run when needs be...
Elway was one and I believe Tebow will too eventually…With patience…
I don't think one style is better than another
At least this research wasn’t meant to say one is better than another, just measure the level of success for each group. Fans have a preference, some like mobile QB’s, like Denver, Tennessee or Philly fans, while SF, Indy or NE fans like pocket passers. To say one is more successful is correct, but at this point, pocket passers are the most successful, and it’s not even close. Balanced passers actually seem to be on the downward trend, with mobile QB’s and pocket passers growing.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Max - another possible way to parse this would be to look at
the # of times a QB was hit vs the number of times a QB was sacked. The thought being that mobile QB’s are going to be able to escape a “hit” more often than pocket passers and avoid the sack. Advanced NFL stats lists QB hits given up (but only as far back as 2000).
http://wp.advancednflstats.com/teamOL.php
Cutler is considered a mobile QB and was sacked 52 times in 2010 while being hit 85 times (61%). Garrard was only sacked 33 times while being hit roughly 100 times (33%). Those numbers would suggest Garrard is more mobile than Cutler. (Cutler started 15 games, Garrard 14)
The problem with this data would be that a pocket passer with a quick release might have a very low number (P. Manning 19 sacks, 46 hits – 41%), but Manning and Brady are known for being mobile “within the pocket”. Brady was sacked 27 times and hit 49 (55%). E. Manning was only sacked 16 times while being hit 46 times (35%)
Nice analysis and Rec’d
For perspective, the Broncos allowed 40 sacks in 2010 but only 57 QB hits (70%)
QB's hits were something I looked into
But there isn’t really a hard rule for mobile QB’s, hit numbers and sacks. It also has a lot to do with offensive line play. It is something to keep in mind, and I appreciate you mentioning it, but it’s hard to apply directly to mobility.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
agreed - I'm going to do a fanpost on QB hit rate (hits/passing att)
and compare that to sack rate (sacks/att) to see if that speaks to a QB’s ability to escape the rush, or just the play of the OL.
by DE_BroncoFan on Jul 5, 2011 11:43 AM MDT up reply actions
I look forward to that
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow me on Twitter @MHR_KaptainKirk
Genius
Maxwell, Just more of the grade a stuff you always do. You must be a college professor or have a job that requires deep analysis. I don’t think you have burnt as many brain cells as the rest of us football fans. Especially Raiders fans
Thanks for your thoughts
I’m no college professor though, but thanks. Glad I could provide a little education.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.










































