MHR Poll of the Week for August 22, 2011: Better Late Than Never
Sorry for the delay folks, but the Mile High Report Poll of the Week missed a week and was delayed a day, but it's back, and after the results of two weeks ago, pumped to get back to keeping ourselves close to the pulse of Mile High Report. Two weeks ago we asked you what type of running back system you would use if you were a NFL head coach, and once again you blew away the previous record in terms of votes, and we had a clear winner:
| Answer: | Votes | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| One Primary Back | 203 | 15% |
| Tandem Backs | 1022 | 76% |
| Don't Really Care | 112 | 8% |
| Total: | 1337 | 100% |
It's pretty clear that the mentality of fans here in Denver has changed since the days of TD and it might be for the best, with a solid stable of backs that Denver currently has. A decent number of respondents answered Don't Really Care and mentioned that what they would do would vary season by season depending on who they drafted or picked up in free agency and that they wouldn't try and just use one system.
So with the great results from the last poll, and two pre-season games to look back on, this weeks poll will continue looking at the running game. Let's get to it.
This week's question that I am posing to you is going to build on last weeks question as well as get a feel for how you would run a team. If you were a NFL head coach, would you be run focused (Reeves, Fox). This style usually doesn't make the big play, but focuses on grinding it out and time control. Pass focused (late Shanny, McD). This style was incredibly popular here, especially with guys like Brandon Marshall and Brandon Lloyd catching the ball. Or do you prefer a balance of the two, maybe not really doing one of the other well, but having both?
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
everyone in our house yelled as he almost hauled this pass in!
it would have been spectacular!!!
great effort anyway.
Chuck Norris once asked Tim Tebow for advice on martial arts.
Last 6 Teams in the Super Bowl
Packers/Steelers; Saints/Colts; Cards/Steelers… all throw the ball. Pack Cards and Colts are obivous passing teams. Steelers used to be known for rushing, and ppl assume they run a lot, but they really dont. They spread the field a whole lot.
the picture up top is one of the best catches that was never made..
and i yelled too when watching the game lol
or not made
"The stupider one is, the closer one is to reality. The stupider one is, the clearer one is. Stupidity is brief and artless, while intelligence wriggles and hides itself.
- Fyodor D
by Whidbey Bronco on Aug 22, 2011 6:33 PM MDT up reply actions
Having high quality
recievers and runners is hard to do. If you can run well it generally means you can pass sufficiently. All of it depends on a good O line.
I would (if anyone asked me) want to pass to run. With a heavy hitter at FB to clean up those short yardage situations.
Here we come SB ;D
I can't help it, I'm excited! Go Broncos!
John Fox's perpentency to be labled a run first head coach...
But with a solid offesne he believe the run/pass might be more balanced than in his years at Carolina. Tilting the balance to the run in Carolina may have been a move he was forced into with solid passing game.
While there is always a need for balance
The NFL rules are tilting further and further in favor of the QB’s and WR’s. With less physical practice time, that trend will continue. If you want to win in the NFL today, you have to pass the ball a lot (though obviously running the ball can’t be as bad as we’ve been the last 2 years)
I’m in favor of running the ball. It’s safer and opens up other safe passes, like play actions. Also, it brings in a safety or two. I know it’s not a pro team, but I like what Stanford did last year.
"When you put on that jersey, the name on the front is more important than the name on the back." - "Miracle".
"Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else." - Vince Lombardi.
I was starting to wonder where you were. Good to see you again, I missed you bro! I like the balanced attack so I voted for that. If I had to choose between one or the other I would have to lean towards running.
"I get sick when I hear athletes say I’m not a role model" "Yes you are. You’re just not a very good one." -Tim Tebow
Haha glad to be back
Works a killer sometimes. And thanks for your response, balanced is a good way to go.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Aug 27, 2011 11:40 PM MDT up reply actions
Thats awesome the poll closed at that number
and its what all fans want, elite tandem running backs. Our own < verb> and . Of course those titles need to be earned, but our guys have nowhere to go but up.








































