Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Following UFC 146 Loss, Jason 'Mayhem' Miller 'Done' in UFC

Pre-Free Agency Thoughts

Greetings friends. It is officially the off season which means that if you look at the fanposts section you are probably going to see a lot of mocks. Tis the season for wild speculation and endless optimism with a side of blind homerism. I had written an extremely long full blown breakdown of the needs of this team by position, but I changed my mind and decided I would go a different direction. We are still many weeks away from Free Agency opening and last Sunday was a very empty day without any football. So let's talk about a few things that I've been thinking about since the season has ended.

Star-divide

1. Don't expect the Broncos to chase a high priced Free Agent.

I have had numerous conversations with friends about how we think the Broncos will attack Free Agency. Some of my friends think that the Broncos are going to go after some high priority free agents. Brandon Carr, Carl Nicks, DeSean Jackson, Marshawn Lynch and Cortland Finnegan are all names that I've heard people say we should/will go after. I 100% disagree. If you are wondering how we are going to approach the off season, I think we should look at last off season as a good indicator.

The Broncos signed several players last year to "value" deals. Willis McGahee, Daniel Fells, and Marcus Thomas were three players signed in free agency last year who all were starters in 2011. Broderick Bunkley was acquired in a trade and he too was a starter. The Broncos signed Ty Warren and he was supposed to be a starter until he got injured in Training Camp. That means the Broncos signed 4 starters last year, but none were high priced. When free agency opens, I expect the Broncos to follow that same strategy. With that being said, here are some players that could be a fit for the Broncos

MLB Lofa Tatupu

MLB is a big problem for the Broncos. Joe Mays is not the answer and nobody is sold on Nate Irving because he didn't get to play as a rookie. Contrary to popular belief, the Broncos aren't going to cut bait with Nate Irving after 1 year and draft a MLB in the early rounds. What they are likely to do is bring in competition for Nate Irving, possibly a stop gap player to play while they let Irving develop. Enter Tatupu.

The former Pro Bowl MLB sat out the 2011 season with a knee injury. He had interest throughout the year from teams like the Raiders, the Bears and the Redskins, but never signed with anyone. He needs a new home and when you combine the facts that he hasn't played in a year and nobody knows how healthy he actually is, he could come relatively cheap. The Broncos can and should look to sign Tatupu to a 2-3 year deal. Not only would Tatupu be an upgrade over Mays, but he brings veteran leadership to a team that could be losing it's biggest leader in Brian Dawkins.

CB William Middleton

Cornerback is a huge need for the Broncos moving forward. Champ Bailey is 34, Andre Goodman is just as old and his skills are quickly eroding. The only young talent at the cornerback position is Chris Harris, the Broncos fantastic 2011 undrafted free agent. Syd'Quan Thompson and Cassius Vaughn are returning, but are coming off of injuries and haven't shown enough to be guaranteed anything. William Middleton is a 26 year old corner who was drafted in the 5th round of the 2009 NFL Draft by the Atlanta Falcons. After being cut and resigned by the Falcons and Bucs, he found his way to Jacksonville where he has played in 39 games in the last 3 years. Middleton was inserted into the starting lineup in 2011 after a bunch of injuries to the Jaguars secondary. He performed well until he too went to IR due to injury. Middleton is a young guy who is still unproven and coming off an injury. The Jags will try to resign him, but Middleton could be persuaded to join former head coach Jack Del Rio in Denver.

FS Mike Adams

Safety was a big issue for the Broncos after Brian Dawkins went down with an injury. Rookie Quinton Carter performed well and looks to have a nice future. Rahim Moore, on the other hand, really struggled and will need to make major strides. A lot depends on whether or not Dawkins plays another year. Assuming he doesn't, the Broncos will need to look for somebody to compete with Rahim Moore for the starting safety job opposite of Carter. Mike Adams played well in 2011 for the Cleveland Browns. Pro Football Focus has him ranked as a top 30 safety and at the age of 30, he could be exactly what the Broncos need; a cheap, veteran safety to compete with Moore.

OG Geoff Hangartner

The Broncos have one of the youngest offensive lines in the NFL. Starting LG Zane Beadles and C J.D. Walton both struggled during the 2011 season, but it is very important for the Broncos to try to keep as much continuity as possible. Offensive Lines take years to gel and the Broncos haven't had continuity on the line in a long time. Unfortunately, the Broncos may have to make a move due to the poor play of Zane Beadles. The former 2nd round pick really struggled throughout the year. The Broncos may try to move Orlando Franklin to G, and put Ryan Harris or Tony Hills at RT, but another solution would be to sign Geoff Hangartner. The former Carolina Panther is 30 years old and spent 2011 as the starting RG for the Panthers. The Panthers are getting back some injured lineman and Hangartner may not be resigned in result. Geoff could be brought in to compete with Beadles as starting guard or he could be a versatile, veteran backup in the mold of Russ Hochstein.

Broderick Bunkley

Broderick Bunkley was the unsung hero of the 2011 defense. Desperately needing defensive tackles, the Broncos acquired Bunkley from the Eagles last off season for an undisclosed late round draft pick. Bunkley was great all year long and proved to be an elite run stopping DT. The problem is that the Broncos now are forced with trying to resign him and it could get tricky. Bunkley will likely command a good price on the open market so Bowlen will have to open his wallet to keep him here. A player who Bunkley could look at in terms of a contract would be Casey Hampton who signed a 3 year, 21 million dollar contract with the Steelers in 2010. Don't make the mistake of thinking Bunkley is automatically going to be back next year. It's going to be difficult if the Broncos aren't going to spend money.

Others:

TE Zach Potter

FB Le'Ron McClain

K Matt Prater

P Britton Colquitt

DT Marcus Thomas

DE Jason Hunter

LB Wesley Woodyard ?

WR Eddie Royal

2. 1st round running back? Maybe. It depends on Free Agency.

First of all, let's take a look at the Broncos depth chart at RB: Willis McGahee, Knowshon Moreno, Jeremiah Johnson, Mario Fannin, and Xavier Omon. Clearly, there is a need. How big of a need? Well, in my eyes, RB is the #4 need behind Defensive Tackle, Cornerback and Linebacker.

I have seen a lot of mocks where the Broncos are taking an RB in the first round (Lamar Miller) citing John Fox's draft history as a reason why the Broncos may look at an RB in the 1st round. Let me just say that I am absolutely not a fan of this draft strategy. Running Back is not a premier position in this league and finding a guy to shoulder half the load or a running attack can be done without spending a 1st round pick. There are several players who can be had in rounds 2-4 who could split carries with McGahee (Doug Martin, Chris Polk, Bernard Pierce, Cyrus Gray, and Robert Turbin to name a few). However, John Fox does place a premium on running the ball and if a player like Miller is available at 25, EFX could pull the trigger.

If the Broncos resign Broderick Bunkley and Marcus Thomas, Defensive Tackle doesn't become as big of a need and opens the door for a possible 1st round RB. If the Broncos only sign one of the above Defensive Tackles, DT will remain a huge need. Free Agency will fill up some holes and highlight the needs as we move deeper into draft season.

3. MLB in the 1st Round? Doubt it.

I briefly talked about this earlier, but I want to talk about it a little more in detail. In recent weeks, there has been some talk that the Broncos would draft a MLB in the 1st round. I don't understand that move at all. In 2011, the Denver Broncos selected Nate Irving in the 3rd round. They cited his intelligence, his toughness and his leadership as to why they picked him and talked about how he would help return the defense to it's former Orange Crush days. Fast forward one year and now the Broncos are going to replace him already? How does that make sense?

The reason I keep hearing is "Nate Irving couldn't even beat out Joe Mays, he isn't the answer". You expect a rookie MLB to start at the most important spot on defense in his first year when he had no off season to learn the playbook? Folks, you had your expectations set way too high. If he isn't the starter in the upcoming season, then you can start to be concerned, but Irving certainly isn't the first rookie to take a redshirt year and he won't be the last. I don't see the Broncos using a premium pick to replace Irving before he has even had a shot at the starting job. The only way I see the Broncos using a high pick on a MLB is if they plan to move Irving over to the Will linebacker spot.

4. Dwayne Allen in the 1st round? No chance.

To the National Media, the Denver Broncos should draft Dwayne Allen. The TE from Clemson is a do-it-all tight end who would drastically help Tim Tebow in the pass game. There are just a few problems with that philosophy.

1. EFX selected two raw tight ends in the 2011 draft and will focus on developing them

2. Neither Elway, Fox nor Xanders have never selected a first round tight end because it's not a premium position.

3. Tight End isn't even a top 5 need on the team.

4. Tight Ends are terrible value in early rounds unless your offense is centered around them which Denver's is not.

5. Who backs up Tebow?

One of the most intriguing story lines this off season will be who the Broncos pick to back up Tebow. The decision will show a lot in terms of what is to be expected of Tebow and the offense moving forward. Will the Broncos pick up a mobile quarterback like Tebow or will the Broncos pick up a pocket passer? If they pick a mobile quarterback, it probably means the Broncos will keep a similar style of offense moving forward. Conversely, If they pick a pocket passer, it likely means they expect the offense to change from what it currently is. Of the quarterbacks available via free agency and the draft, here are the best solutions for each scenario:

Mobile Quarterback

Josh Johnson

Dennis Dixon

Russel Wilson

Pocket Quarterback

Nick Foles

Ryan Tannehill

Brandon Weeden

This weekend, I will be participating in a 5 round live mock draft at Mocking the Draft, the SB Nation draft site. I look forward to seeing what happens and posting the results for everyone here to see. Until then, MHR.

This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

Comment 156 comments  |  18 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great post.

I don’t entirely agree with everything, but you make a very reasonable case for it all. Rec’d.

by swg777 on Feb 14, 2012 5:54 AM MST reply actions  

Much appreciated swg.

Follow me on Twitter: @ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder

by Nick Cast on Feb 14, 2012 8:29 AM MST up reply actions  

You know our team very well, and you’re knowledgeable about the draft. That leads to a good evaluation! I agree with you on most of your points. The one I would differ on is the QB spot. I don’t think Denver needs to sign or draft a young QB behind Tebow. A player like Gerrard, who is mobile and a veteran, fits the bill for me.

by MileHighFlyr on Feb 14, 2012 6:02 AM MST reply actions  

I disagree,

any QB that is brought in to Denver will be given an opportunity to compete with Timmy. Gerrard has alot to prove after taking last year off, but he might not like to compete with Timmy. I think that Gerrard will want a startings pay and a starters job.

by Bron#1 Fan on Feb 14, 2012 7:28 AM MST up reply actions  

right - and Gerrard would not be coming into the Broncos camp as the starter

that and there would be a huge fan revolt if Gerrard started game 1, even if he played lights out in the pre-season.

Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.

by DE_BroncoFan on Feb 14, 2012 8:43 AM MST up reply actions  

The fan revolt

would reverse pretty quickly with wins!~

Go Broncos!
2011 AFC West Champions

by Sean in Pa. on Feb 15, 2012 4:17 AM MST up reply actions  

You mean like the wins we got last year with Tebow?

Including the first playoff victory since the Jake Plummer era? Anyone who thinks Garrard should play over Tebow is a Tebow-hater, pure and simple. There is no way any objective person would say that an over the hill and recently injured journeyman like Garrard is a better option than Tim Tebow.

Oh, you were finished? Oh, well, allow me to retort!
--Jules Winnfield

by GrizBronc on Feb 15, 2012 9:37 AM MST up reply actions  

Wow, lol

First off, even if I did think Garrard should play, that does not make me a Tebow hater. Sure wouild like to see that phrase die. I don’t love Tebow, ok? That does not mean I hate Tebow.
As to my statement. If any QB starts over Tebow, the fans will scream bloody murder, and slowly come around if that starter is winning. I really don’t get it. Tebow is young, strong, athletic, smart, and he has a lot of potential. But there are no guarentees. He really did make mistakes last year. So Teflon Tebow is fair game for some critisism and even have it suggested that another QB could outplay him.

Go Broncos!
2011 AFC West Champions

by Sean in Pa. on Feb 15, 2012 11:19 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

we already have the winning with Tebow why would we make a switch like that?

I could see if we were losing and it was Tebow’s fault.

Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.

by BroncoMath101 on Feb 16, 2012 5:01 PM MST up reply actions  

Good question

I don’t really want to change QB’s right now. I do want a QB that is capable of replacing Tebow, Duh
Tebow was winning, barely. and after a six game win streak came a three game losing streak. We just barely made the playoffs.
Now, WE MADE THE PLAYOFFS! Yay!! Ok, but I also feel it was a team effort as much as it was Tebow. So, I do see room for improvement. I would like to see Tebow make strides and play better. I would like to see him become a superstar QB leading the Broncos to many happy wins. Even with all that happening I still want a QB backing him or whoever and can come in to run our offense and win. I don’t see any problem with discussing Tebows problems or discussing possible replacements. Heck man, we can’t do anything about it, but we can talk (type).

Go Broncos!
2011 AFC West Champions

by Sean in Pa. on Feb 17, 2012 7:15 AM MST up reply actions  

It all started with this
I don’t think Denver needs to sign or draft a young QB behind Tebow. A player like Gerrard, who is mobile and a veteran, fits the bill for me.

from milehighflyr. I am just arguing that we can talk about it.
My first involvment came when someone mentioned the fan revolt and I said wins would quiet that. This topic gets so out of control so quickly. I never said one word about Garrard starting instead of Tebow

Go Broncos!
2011 AFC West Champions

by Sean in Pa. on Feb 17, 2012 9:28 AM MST up reply actions  

As far as QB's go

I think Brady Quinn could be resigned and may be a decent fit for this offense. He is a big strong guy, he should be able to carry the ball. He can throw and this offense would not require him to throw a lot. I don’t know what his confidence issues are, what makes him play like he did in pre season last year. But this is a different game plan. Weber is under contract right? So we resign Quinn and and we don’t draft a QB, then I think we could go for a RB, or use that to bring in a CB.

Go Broncos!
2011 AFC West Champions

by Sean in Pa. on Feb 17, 2012 11:03 AM MST up reply actions  

Sean, the thread I commented on included speculation that Garrard would only come to Denver as a starter.

Then someone said that would cause a fan revolt, and you said the revolt would die down with wins. It certainly seemed like you were supporting the suggestions that Garrard should be brought in to start over Tebow.

Oh, you were finished? Oh, well, allow me to retort!
--Jules Winnfield

by GrizBronc on Feb 17, 2012 11:26 AM MST up reply actions  

@griz..I to think that Tim will lose any competition at QB. NFL=Passing

Kreese and Lawrence will decide if Tim Tebow can develop into our future.
Bronco fan since 1966. Current biggest Bronco fan in Vegas, living the good life.

by DLMyers on Feb 15, 2012 12:31 PM MST up reply actions  

NFL=Winning

there, fixed that for you

"It's all over fat man!"
-Tom Jackson
"When John Elway is standing in lava with a football, he will stay there and sink until you're open"
-Seanbaby

by Calikula on Feb 15, 2012 8:53 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

There is little chance Garrard comes here

Del Rio treated him like crap last year. Unless Garrard has early stage Alzheimer’s, he will look elsewhere.

by yibberat on Feb 16, 2012 11:19 AM MST up reply actions  

Nice post.

I see your thinking on last season low budjet (quality) free agent signings. I had a feeling none of the higher priced (quality) Fa’s wanted to come to denver after the 2010 debacle. So maybe now after a promising 2011 season things will change. Or i hope at least. GB!!

by CenCalBronco on Feb 14, 2012 6:44 AM MST via mobile reply actions  

I like your FA signings and I think they are much more realistic than many of the pie-in-the-sky FA predictions that other on MHR are making

I’d love to see Tatupu playing for the Broncos. If he is 90% of what he was before the injury (3 time pro-bowl, 1 time All-Pro) then he would be a great value signing. I think Philly is going to throw a lot of money at him though.

Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.

by DE_BroncoFan on Feb 14, 2012 6:50 AM MST reply actions  

I love your perspective Nick. rec

I agree with what you say just not the names you throw out. IMO the areas we will look to FA is the areas we lose our own vets at. For instance, as you said also, if Dawkins can’t return we will be looking to replace him with a FA. I think Hochstein is also to old to re-sign and we will replace him. Goodman has seen better days and has dropped off considerably. We can replace him with about the same money in FA too. Backup QB could be OK if we re-sign Quinn. MLB has everyione up in arms, but in reality we’re fine depending on who we lose in FA. If Irving isn’t ready we play DJ at MLB. I also agree that Bunkley will be a hard sign. He will demand at least 5 mil/yr. That’s pretty steep. Thomas is abou the same player Bunkley is. One will leave I think. RB will be a draft pick. Thanks for the thoughts.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 14, 2012 6:53 AM MST reply actions  

Regarding Irving, there were three MLBs drafted after the first two rounds last year who started as rookies in the NFL

Mason Foster (3rd rnd) started 15 games for the Bucs, who had the worst overall defense in the NFL last season.
Colin McCarthy (4th rnd) started 7 games for the Titans out of necessity because of injuries. The Titans D was ranked 8th overall in 2011.
Casey Matthews (5th rnd) ended up starting 3 games for the Eagles who finished the season with the 10th ranked D.

Going back to 2010 you find zero rookies who made starts at MLB. I didn’t check 2009.

It can happen, but it seems rare for a rookie drafted after the first two rounds to start at Mike.

Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.

by DE_BroncoFan on Feb 14, 2012 7:09 AM MST reply actions  

James Laurenitis (2009) did

The Rams took him with the 35th pick and I wanted him.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.

KaptainKirk on FaceBook

by KaptainKirk on Feb 14, 2012 7:21 AM MST up reply actions  

35th pick is the second round last time I checked :-)

Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.

by DE_BroncoFan on Feb 14, 2012 8:43 AM MST up reply actions  

Rolando McClain was a day 1 starter and picked 8th overall. You do make a good point though.

"If we cannot find a way, we will make one." -Hannibal

by AvalancheRescueDog on Feb 14, 2012 12:48 PM MST up reply actions  

in my eyes, RB is the #4 need behind Defensive Tackle, Cornerback and Linebacker.

Mine too, but I wouldn’t discount the depth at DE in this draft (not that you have). I think the odds of the Broncos picking one early. are good.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.

KaptainKirk on FaceBook

by KaptainKirk on Feb 14, 2012 7:18 AM MST reply actions  

I would put it #3

CB depth is a need, DT is a need because we have none, but RB is a important need. McGahee is old and fox has already said he wants to limit McGahee’s carries. With Tebow at QB we will need a strong running game, getting a legit runner who can share the load with McGahee is a must.

Now i think we’ll address it via the draft, Lamar Miller in my eyes would be the perfect compliment too McGahee. He’s FAST and explosive and would give us a legit homerun threat which we have been lacking for years

by Scotty Payne on Feb 14, 2012 8:35 AM MST up reply actions  

Morning Kaptain

The odds of picking a RB or a DE early are good?

Follow me on Twitter: @ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder

by Nick Cast on Feb 14, 2012 10:01 AM MST up reply actions  

I think so

DE’s and CB’s seem to be the strength (so far) of this draft. I haven’t looked too deep yet though. I do have a pre-Combine post coming next week on the Production Ratio for the front seven. It will give us a narrower group to focus on during the Combine. I feel certain that they will pick up at least one RB, but I’m not sure if it will be FA or the draft. Hopefully both.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.

KaptainKirk on FaceBook

by KaptainKirk on Feb 14, 2012 3:21 PM MST up reply actions  

Interesting thoughts Kirk. I like some of the DE’s in this class, but I wouldn’t necessarily say they are a strength of the class.

Do you suspect we will be selecting a DE high in the draft? I like the combination of Doom and Ayers and both are capable starters in my eyes.

Follow me on Twitter: @ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder

by Nick Cast on Feb 15, 2012 12:37 AM MST up reply actions  

I think this is a weak class for an every down 4-3 DE but pretty good if you want a situational rusher or a 3-4 olb.
I think they look someone to challenge Ayers at some point. Need to generate a better 4 man rush from inside and out.

"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson

by SteveUK on Feb 15, 2012 6:29 AM MST up reply actions   2 recs

Not necessarily to challenge Ayers

But look at the Giants front 4. They keep drafting DL’s no matter what. They put a priority on getting to the QB. And if they are tying up draft money, which is small compared to FA money, that is a reasonable expense. If the Broncos had been doing that for the last 4 years, Dumervil wouldn’t be getting $14M a year. Not to mention, it seems to be a good formula for beating the Patriots (who are a perennial ovstacle for the Super Bowl in the AFC), but to win the big game too.
A solid D-Line rotation would go a long ways IMO.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.

KaptainKirk on FaceBook

by KaptainKirk on Feb 15, 2012 6:52 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

A better d line rotation to get to the passer would be great.
I am not just not that high on Ayers. I think he can come in a do a good job against the run but we need more productivity out of him in the passing game. Maybe him in a better rotation would help.

"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson

by SteveUK on Feb 15, 2012 7:52 AM MST up reply actions  

Good point on the 12M for Doom Kaptain.

"Peace, a journey without distance to a place we have never left."

by BroncoCUbuffs on Feb 15, 2012 11:00 AM MST up reply actions  

to back your point about the Giant's draft strategy - here are their DT and DE picks in the past 7 years and round in which they were picked

Marvin Austin – 2nd, Jason Piere-Paul – 1st, Linval Joseph – 2nd, Robert Henderson – 7th, Jay Alford – 3rd, Mathias Kiwanuka – 1st, Barry Cofield – 4th, Justin Tuck -3rd, Eric Moore – 6th

2 first round picks, 2 second round picks, 2 third round picks, 1 in the 4th, 6th and 7th. So they have drafted 9 guys who play the front 4 in the past 7 years. Of those 9, 8 are still in the NFL (Henderson – not) and 6 are still with the Giants (Moore was on the Pats last year and Cofield on the Skins).

Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.

by DE_BroncoFan on Feb 15, 2012 11:02 AM MST up reply actions   2 recs

Thanks for adding that to the conversation.

Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.

KaptainKirk on FaceBook

by KaptainKirk on Feb 15, 2012 2:42 PM MST up reply actions  

Great stuff

8/9 still in the league 6 on the team. Cofield a big money FA move to Skins

wow that shows more than anything how important Reese and their FO have been there

"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson

by SteveUK on Feb 17, 2012 1:30 AM MST up reply actions  

Great post as usual.

As far as FA’s I think with 50 or so million, not saying that there going to spend it all, I think we can go out and get atleast 1 big name guy; Carr, Tolbert, maybe Garcon, or Ginn Jr. Not #1 guys but guys that can be a good #2 on our team for #2 money. Carr might want #1 money, but he has #2 talent.

What do you think of resigning Eddie Royal? I would like to keep him, but Washington could be on the top of his list of teams to join.

by Bron#1 Fan on Feb 14, 2012 7:33 AM MST reply actions  

Good post dude,

I think we’ll go after a few big names, we were finalist for DeAngelo, Connected to Charles Johnson, Mebane and a few others. Now we’re 50+ million under the cap, we could go after 1 or 2 impact FA’s. I think we’ll get more mid level guys, but wouldnt surprise me to see us connected to a top FA at DT or CB

I’d rather get someone else over Lofa, there’s a reason teams passed him up. If healthy sure, but how much milage do those knee’s have?

Middleton is a guy who i think we get, he did pretty well this year, Del Rio knows him, he’s young.

I agree with you on the Draft, doubt we go MLB or TE in the 1st, you know how i feel about RB in the 1st

I think we’ll get a more traditional back-up. I know everyone thinks we’ll go with a mobile QB like Johnson, or Dixon but i doubt it. They won’t be able to run the offense Tebow does. The zone read works because of Tebow’s threat to run. Yeah those guys can run, but won’t survive. A veteran QB like Garrard

by Scotty Payne on Feb 14, 2012 8:27 AM MST reply actions  

Great Post

very well reasoned and I like the list of potential free agent signing, some names there I haven’t seen mentioned on here before.

by drewshap on Feb 14, 2012 8:35 AM MST reply actions  

First impressions/taking the time to ponder

Always, quality posts Nick, thanks.

I just have two thoughts at this point but hope to revisit this post to ponder on a deeper level. One, I’m not saying Walton needs to be replaced but there is this nagging sense that he cannot physically stand up to the bigger stronger D lines that shredded us this past year. In other words, the jury is still out for both him and Beadles. Secondly, I’m still trying to process this whole idea of BPA. I’m leaning towards acquiring elite talent whenever it presents itself, of course that definition is up to EFX and subject to misperception on their part). I could see us taking Konz at center in the 1st round IF they see him as an elite player but the same could be said for any other position if one let’s go of drafting for need. I could also see us signing a FA that fits this profile given his attitude fits as well as the physical talents. Ultimately, I’m saying when there is a chance to grab elite talent do so regardless of need.

"Peace, a journey without distance to a place we have never left."

by BroncoCUbuffs on Feb 14, 2012 8:46 AM MST reply actions  

Walton and Beadles could be replaced

Beadles did play well down the stretch, walton is the weak link i think, i think he gets one more year to prove himself

by Scotty Payne on Feb 14, 2012 9:06 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree Scotty...Beadles did play better as the season played out and Walton should have one more year to prove himself.

Either or both could be starters while other talent develops, say we pick Konz in the draft, and either or both might make great backup/utility players. There is still the chances both could end up being part of an entrenched starting unit for years to come. However, that nagging doubt just lingers at this point.

I’ve heard there is a quality FA center coming on the market but can’t remember who or where from.

"Peace, a journey without distance to a place we have never left."

by BroncoCUbuffs on Feb 14, 2012 9:41 AM MST up reply actions  

Chris Myers

our ex center, still not sure why shanny let him go…He’s really good, but will be pricey.

Personally i would be disappointed if we went konz, he would upgrade the line, but i really don’t like going OL in the first unless it’s a LT or a nasty G.

by Scotty Payne on Feb 14, 2012 9:50 AM MST up reply actions  

Chris Polk is much bigger, which may fit our focus on the power running game...but can't say I've seen L. Miller play.

Man, can you imagine an elite back behind our # 1 running attack. To me this concept opens up the development of Tebow on a much less stringent time frame and makes the Broncos unique personnel/match up wise.

"Peace, a journey without distance to a place we have never left."

by BroncoCUbuffs on Feb 14, 2012 10:23 AM MST up reply actions  

We already have a power guy with McGahee

Miller would give us the speed/explosion guy. Really love his upside

Watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7dxPzUBoi4

by Scotty Payne on Feb 14, 2012 11:00 AM MST up reply actions  

It was like watching TD

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 14, 2012 11:51 AM MST up reply actions  

He does remind me of TD...but faster.

He’s not quite as hard a runner as TD was, but he makes up for it in burst.

Just watch how graceful he is. He keeps his pads down. Even at top speed, it looks like he’s in control. Lots of short steps.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 4:32 PM MST up reply actions  

another favorable comparison between TD and Miller is that both are "low mileage" RBs

IIRC TD only started one of two season at UGA. Miller was only a starter for two years at UM (2010 and 2011).

Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.

by DE_BroncoFan on Feb 16, 2012 1:15 PM MST up reply actions  

#25

I believe we need a DT or CB with this pick but I think you just sold me with this video…I remember watching Moreno on youtube the same way but Miller and Knowshon are like night and day…Miller’s got the IT factor!! We need speed and plamaking ability on the offensive side and he would give us that

Football is a TEAM GAME!! One player doesn't win it for you, one player doesn't lose it for you....When it comes down to it, I just want to WIN!!

GO BRONCOS!!

by milehighinTO on Feb 16, 2012 10:29 AM MST up reply actions  

I thought the same thing.

Yeah right Moreno fooled me with youtube vids. As I watched though I got sold.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 16, 2012 8:29 PM MST up reply actions  

From what I heard that was more Sundquists eff up than Shanny's

Shanny wanted to bring him back, and Myers wanted to stay, but Ted Sundquist messed it up. He was fired by Shanny that year I believe

"It's all over fat man!"
-Tom Jackson
"When John Elway is standing in lava with a football, he will stay there and sink until you're open"
-Seanbaby

by Calikula on Feb 14, 2012 11:07 AM MST up reply actions  

I thought it was more about his restricted status and Denver not being able to offer him starter money

Houston could and Denver still had Nalen in the line up so couldn’t compete. So Denver took the compensation.

"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."

"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes" Douglas Adams

by orange&blue_aussie on Feb 14, 2012 6:34 PM MST up reply actions  

Beadles was the bulldozer up front in those so many easy Tebow runs for TDs (or 2 point conversions)

Walton can be nasty in the run game but is easily overrun in Pass Protection, I imagine if we upgrade anywhere in the Offensive Line it’d be center.

by CombatChuk on Feb 14, 2012 9:43 AM MST up reply actions  

Yeah, Beadles is good as the pulling gaurd

he needs to improve in the passing game though, alot of pressure up the middle was allowed by him.

by Scotty Payne on Feb 14, 2012 9:53 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

yep

Beadles is a very good pull blocker…. good feet and quick through the hole to get to the 2nd level and pick up a LB.

But he struggles at the point at times, both run blocking and in pass protect.

Overall, he’s solidly in the bottom half of NFL starter LGs…

by cjfarls on Feb 14, 2012 7:11 PM MST up reply actions  

Nice post.

To me this is more realistic then what I’ve seen. The only thing I disagree with is one of the needs. I don’t think LB is that big of a need. Now if Irving doesn’t play well this year, then yes I would say it would be. Other than that, I’m about where most people are at in terms of needs for the team—CB, DT, RB, and Safety. I’m disapointed that Safety is on the list. If Moore would have been at least average, this wouldn’t be an issue because Carter had a nice year. Then the broncos could focus on depth at other spots. Hopefully Moore puts on at least 10 lbs of muscle over the offseason because that guy needs it.

by tiderfootball09 on Feb 14, 2012 8:49 AM MST reply actions  

our young safeties should improve

but something that would help them A LOT is better coverage from the MLB position.

I can’t count the number of times opposing teams dropped passes into the middle of the field in front the safeties. Some of that was slow response from the safeties, but a lot of that was failure of Mays to get deep enough in his drop and/or move laterally to contest the throw.

by cjfarls on Feb 14, 2012 7:17 PM MST up reply actions  

I think safety is the hardest position to learn on defense (at least in the NFL).

So…I’m not optimistic that Moore will make a quantum leap.

Carter showed a lot of promise last season. But we can expect to see more screw ups from him.

To me – if Dawkins retires – we need to bring in a veteran to play alongside Carter.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 4:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Good point. I think the entire secondary (except Champ) should partake in a tackling clinic this offseason.

"If we cannot find a way, we will make one." -Hannibal

by AvalancheRescueDog on Feb 16, 2012 12:07 PM MST up reply actions  

I will have...

a serving of the blind homerism, and a side of the wild speculation please. And lastly, I would like a hot steamy cup of optimism…thank you.

by bleedbroncos on Feb 14, 2012 8:49 AM MST reply actions  

Nice write up Nick.

I’m not sure I agree RB is #4. I would put it CB #1, RB #2, DT #3 and MLB #4.

by ThorpeBroncosfan on Feb 14, 2012 9:15 AM MST reply actions  

I agree on one and two.
  1. depends on our own FAs re-signing or not. #4 is not even a need IMO.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 14, 2012 9:33 AM MST up reply actions  

A lot of good points.

Especially about the tight ends. I have given up on trying to explain why the Broncos won’t take a TE over at Mocking The Draft.

And I agree with you on no MLB and RB in the first. Hearing from Andrew Mason that the Broncos believe in Irving was very good to hear, and it makes me hope that he can still be a long term answer but were a long way away from finding that out (although for rosterbaters like myself, it’s nice to think about him being the guy moving forward and MLB not being such a big question mark). I love Lamar Miller but he’s just not worth it in the first.

Wooooot! one of my teams made the postseason and won! PLAYOFFS!!!1
Denver Broncos: 2011 AFC WEST Champs!
Come on Toronto teams, one of you make the goddamn playoffs.

by Eddie.Teach on Feb 14, 2012 9:20 AM MST reply actions  

Yeah it was nice to hear EFX is high on Irving.

No way we go TE early. TE is a luxury pick, and we have way to many holes to address the TE position. I am also high on Miller, but i think he may be worth it at 25. I doubt he falls very far if we pass him up, or even if he makes it to us, Cinci could take him.

by Scotty Payne on Feb 14, 2012 10:10 AM MST up reply actions  

You've made a good effort.
I have given up on trying to explain why the Broncos won’t take a TE over at Mocking The Draft.

But you just don’t get it, do you? Giant fans are always going to know what our team needs more than we do.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 4:36 PM MST up reply actions  

Good Post. I also don't see us targeting a MLB in round 1 but if Zach Brown falls his tangibles might be too tempting to pass up.

I personally am hoping for either a DE or RB in rd 1 (or CB if a good one falls not named Janoris Jenkins).

Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.

by BroncoMath101 on Feb 14, 2012 10:13 AM MST reply actions  

I like Brown too.

Reports on him say that he can cover. He can cover. He can cover.

To me, that’s one of D’s biggest vulnerabilities. We need an LB who can actually cover.

If we ended up taking Brown in the first round, I wouldn’t be upset at all. I just don’t know what position he’d play. I’ve seen some people say that we’d just convert him to MLB, but I don’t know if that easy or not (I really don’t – I’m not being flip).

If we could convert him to MLB, then I’d be subterranean on that action.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 4:39 PM MST up reply actions  

I hear you about position

We are set at SLB with Von. We have 2 solid players as WLB: DJ and Woody. But we are lacking at MLB. Make him MLB? Not thrilled about that

by si_ice on Feb 15, 2012 6:21 PM MST up reply actions  

Is that easy to do?

It seems to me there’s definitely value in experience. I’m not sure how easy it is to make that switch.

Then again, Urlacher switched from safety to linebacker – and he rocked it from his rookie year onward.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 8:21 PM MST up reply actions  

Fox was successful doing it with Beason. If he thinks Brown can play MLB then I believe he can.

Of course we don’t know what Fox thinks.

Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.

by BroncoMath101 on Feb 16, 2012 5:03 PM MST up reply actions  

I've said it before

and no one listens. Maybe you will. Fox did not draft Beason with the intent to switch him to MLB. Dan Morgan got hurt and he was forced to move him there. look it up.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 16, 2012 8:26 PM MST up reply actions  

You're right maybe he will.

I don’t like Brown for MLB though. I do like Brown at #25 and then trade DJ to highest bidder. An extra 3rd next year may come in real handy and we would have a fresh young Will. The thought of Miller, Irving and Brown for the next 10 years almost makes me wet myself.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 17, 2012 1:40 PM MST up reply actions  

Awesome post Nick

Here’s the thing with Nate Irving… you are more than likely right. MLB’s have the most responsibility of any player in the defense. The lockout really screwed Irving, Rahim Moore, both our young TE’s, and almost any inexperienced player.

Having said that… by way of Josh McDaniels / Matt Russell, we have the Patriots draft method (ATL and KC follow the same methods). We follow the BPA formula, and it doesn’t really matter what we need or don’t need… we draft talent. Nate Irving was a 3rd round pick…. MANY 3rd round picks become nothing more than depth. Of course EFX is going to say the correct things regarding Nate, or any rookie. They are going to say X player is going to return our team to greatness. They are drafted to bring this team back to glory days. BUT…. there’s no guarantee with any of them.

If EFX sees a MLB in the 1st, or any round for that matter, that they feel will upgrade the talent level, and that player is the best player available to their scheme, then make no bones about it, that player WILL be drafted. Marcell Dareus looked to be a MUCH bigger need than a pass rusher last draft, but that didn’t stop EFX from nabbing a superior talent. Nate Irving was a 3rd rounder…. we needed depth and a starter there…. if they feel he can be upgraded, they’ll pull that trigger without hesitation.

But you are more than likely right…. he was redshirted, and will contribute much more this coming year.

"If you went to the Fair with this guy and you played that game where you have to throw the ball through the hole..... he may never get it through the hole, but he's still gonna be walking away with all the stuffed animals!" Prime's commentary on our very own Tim Tebow!!!

"As iron sharpens iron, so will one man sharpen another." The Bible, by way of Tim Tebow.

"If I had to choose between an abundance of football intelligence, or football wisdom, I'd choose wisdom every single time...... John Fox has enough football wisdom to be carried in a dump truck." Me!

by PaleHorse78 on Feb 14, 2012 10:32 AM MST reply actions   2 recs

If I'm understanding the BPA thing this is the reason I'm thinking Konz could be our 1st pick or, as you say, "in the 1st or any other round for that matter" we'll take the best player available.

Here’s a link I am finding helpful in examining the BPA concept regardless of position. Each position listed in the link gives an estimated draft position with tweeners listed like this: 1st, 1-2nd potential, 2, 2-3 potential.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/TSX/2012_RB

"Peace, a journey without distance to a place we have never left."

by BroncoCUbuffs on Feb 14, 2012 10:42 AM MST up reply actions  

nice brother

thanks for that. :-)

"If you went to the Fair with this guy and you played that game where you have to throw the ball through the hole..... he may never get it through the hole, but he's still gonna be walking away with all the stuffed animals!" Prime's commentary on our very own Tim Tebow!!!

"As iron sharpens iron, so will one man sharpen another." The Bible, by way of Tim Tebow.

"If I had to choose between an abundance of football intelligence, or football wisdom, I'd choose wisdom every single time...... John Fox has enough football wisdom to be carried in a dump truck." Me!

by PaleHorse78 on Feb 14, 2012 7:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Given the likely draft of other teams

the most likely BPA for us is going to be DT. I highly doubt either Brockers or Still will actually be available when we pick – but I have seen mocks with them falling to us. And along with Fletcher Cox and Jerel Worthy and brandon Thompson – it’s a position that is pretty loaded at the top tier – with not a lot of teams looking to draft them early because so many were drafted last year.

that’s the dynamic that tends to produce 1st round BPA’s.

by yibberat on Feb 16, 2012 11:28 AM MST up reply actions  

The BPA formula is great, but let's not pretend that EFX are going to blindly take the highest player left on their board regardless of needs.

For example, if they have an outside LB as the highest rated player left on their board, but below him there is a MLB and a CB, there is no way they are going to draft the OLB. We are two-deep at both positions with WW and DJ at Will and Von and Haggen at Sam. The same goes for all the positions where we are set like PK, P, LT, RG if Kuper is healthy, WR.

The BPA formula is that you take the best player available at a position of need. You don’t reach for an inferior player to fill a specific position, but you go into the draft with 6 or 8 positions that you are looking to fill, and then you take the best player on the board who fills one of those positions.

Otherwise you are just doing an autopick in a fantasy draft where the computer selects the highest ranked player. This results in rosters with 4 RB and no WR. There is more to being a GM than being able to see who the best players are. You need to be able to build a roster.

Oh, you were finished? Oh, well, allow me to retort!
--Jules Winnfield

by GrizBronc on Feb 15, 2012 9:53 AM MST up reply actions  

That's not really what I'm saying

and if you think about it, MLB is a need. I know we have Mays and Irving, but they didn’t do much last year. Of course we’re not going to be looking for a LT… we have that on lock. But certain positions on this team… MLB being one of them… are severe needs. EFX will take the BPA, if they see a guy they feel can bring much more to the table than Irving can. Last time I checked, we need a backup MLB too.

My comment was more about people thinking we’re set at MLB, and EFX can see the bigger picture. There is no rule that says if you’re drafted a 3rd rounder, you’re going to be the starter.

Coming into last year, I’m not sure there was a bigger need than DT. Did EFX address it though? Nope. They opted to draft guys at other positions, that might not have been AS much of a need as DT. Instead of taking the #15 DT on their board, they took the #1 Safety.

If EFX sees a MLB in the 1st, or any round for that matter, that they feel will upgrade the talent level, and that player is the best player available to fit their scheme, then make no bones about it, that player WILL be drafted.

"If you went to the Fair with this guy and you played that game where you have to throw the ball through the hole..... he may never get it through the hole, but he's still gonna be walking away with all the stuffed animals!" Prime's commentary on our very own Tim Tebow!!!

"As iron sharpens iron, so will one man sharpen another." The Bible, by way of Tim Tebow.

"If I had to choose between an abundance of football intelligence, or football wisdom, I'd choose wisdom every single time...... John Fox has enough football wisdom to be carried in a dump truck." Me!

by PaleHorse78 on Feb 15, 2012 10:21 AM MST up reply actions  

Pale if Irving is not ready we can move DJ there.

Also about Zach Brown. Fox is partial to speedy LBs. If Brown is there I think he may be the pick and TC will work it out to who plays where. Miller, Brown, Irving, DJ, Woody, Mohammed are 5 pretty darn good LBs to choose 3 starters from.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 15, 2012 11:00 AM MST up reply actions  

I'm not convinced the Broncos employ a BPA approach.

Elway’s quotes don’t always indicate they’re going BPA. It’s a mixed bag.

Then, if we look at last year’s draft, I don’t think we employed a BPA. Some people point to the idea that we didn’t take a DT at all as proof that we employed a BPA approach. While others say that our selection of Von Miller was BPA. The truth is, our biggest need was another pass rusher – and Von Miller embodied that.

Anyway, maybe I’m wrong, but I’d love to hear the arguments.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 4:59 PM MST up reply actions  

There are positions that have more value than others. Elway has said there are impact positions

LT, DE, CB, QB. If we think a WR is the best player available that doesn’t mean he is rated as high on EFX board because they may value DEs more so there may be a DE that we have lower who may be higher on their board. BPA is relative for every team.

Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.

by BroncoMath101 on Feb 16, 2012 5:07 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

and I TOTALLY disagree about OLB

DJ, Haggan, Woodyard, Von Miller – If EFX sees Zach Brown as an instant upgrade for our scheme… someone they believe can bring more to the table than DJ/Woodyard…. they WILL draft him and let Woodyard walk / trade DJ. Now… this is only if there’s no one else at another position that is the BPA who fits their scheme.

For instance…. we can both probably agree that DE isn’t the biggest need for us. Some would even say that outside of a backup, we don’t need one at all. However…. from what I hear, we are infatuated with Melvin Ingram from South Carolina. If what you say is true, then surely we would opt to draft a CB, RB, or DT in front of him. But I doubt it…. if they see Ingram as the BPA who makes sense for their scheme at #25, then they won’t hesitate. Not even if Still is on the board at a much bigger position of need. If what you say is true, then Dareus would have surely been the pick last year.

"If you went to the Fair with this guy and you played that game where you have to throw the ball through the hole..... he may never get it through the hole, but he's still gonna be walking away with all the stuffed animals!" Prime's commentary on our very own Tim Tebow!!!

"As iron sharpens iron, so will one man sharpen another." The Bible, by way of Tim Tebow.

"If I had to choose between an abundance of football intelligence, or football wisdom, I'd choose wisdom every single time...... John Fox has enough football wisdom to be carried in a dump truck." Me!

by PaleHorse78 on Feb 15, 2012 10:29 AM MST up reply actions  

you can never have too many pass rushers and DE is an impact position. I actually think it is a need because if Doom went down again we would be screwed.

Ayers is a good end but not a good pass rushing end. We need another DE who can get to the QB opposite Doom. IMO it is a big need.

Tim Tebow wears 3WM and drinks Tuscan whole milk.

by BroncoMath101 on Feb 16, 2012 5:08 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

There is more than one way to build a roster

True BPA actually does mean occasionally drafting to strength. Yes, those guys may well sit on the bench the first year – but drafting to strength gives a team trade chips – and those can be used to purchase high draft picks and players of need. That roster strength also allows a team to let FA’s go – which gives a team future compensatory picks and allows for salary cap money to be spent more effectively.

Every team in the NFL blathers on about “drafting the best player available”. Most of it is complete nonsense. What else would one expect them to say – that they are reaching for players? Most teams draft for need and the occasions when BPA actually coincides with need are pretty rare. That’s not to say that there is some big difference between the 54th best player and the 56th best player – so even BPA teams will tend to draft whichever one of those fits a need if both are available.

But the ONLY true BPA draft is one where a team is occasionally drafting to strength. Because BPA depends on fluky stuff that happens on draft day with other teams – and that has nothing to do with a particular team’s need

by yibberat on Feb 16, 2012 11:41 AM MST up reply actions  

You really make the case to trade down....

unless there is a DT they want at 25? The Broncos need to add depth in alot of places – so I think the mid-draft has best value this year for what our teams needs. Didnt we take THREE LB last year? Why on earth would be take any more this year? Id like to see them draft DT and CB and bring in FA for Safety and CB…MLB is anybody’s guess right now, but there are few good options…If an MLB is let go from another team as cap casualty I could see EFX adding him to D….Otherwise Elway should tell the coaches to get busy and coach LBs and address other needs in draft – our HC and DC were BOTH LBs and LB coaches.

by Denverkewl on Feb 14, 2012 11:12 AM MST reply actions  

why would we take a LB this year? because we don'

Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.

by DE_BroncoFan on Feb 14, 2012 12:07 PM MST up reply actions  

(reply fail) because we don't want any of these guys or the like starting at LB for the BRoncos

Nate Webster, Jamie Winborn, Boss Bailey, Andra Davis
All 4 of these guys started at LB for the Broncos and never again started in the NFL .

Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.

by DE_BroncoFan on Feb 14, 2012 12:13 PM MST up reply actions  

The propensity for Fox to draft a defensive tackle in the first round is little to none, even though most pundits desire him to do so...

RBs ~ DEs ~ OTs ~ and CBs are Fox’s game for 1st round picks.

I would be sorely surprised if he drafted anything other than one of those in the first. At #25 taking a RB and missing on him is a big concern because he handles the ball and get’s hit a lot more than most other positions. But at 25 the cost is much lower than say Moreno at 12 so it wouldn’t hurt near as bad if he went sour. Nobody likes a first round bust though, and that’s hard to swallow sometimes. Since Monte Ball going going back to finish his senior year I hope we pass on RB in the 1st unless Fox falls in love with Lamar Miller…

I think we are pretty set at OT with Clady, Franklin, R Harris and Clark…Plus the unkown Adam Grant and Tony Hills, so I don’t see us making that position a first round need.

Definitely could use a young cornerback to develop behind Champ and Goodman, but if he isn’t at least 5’11 190lbs forget about it. I do believe we will address the position somewhere down the line in the draft though and there are some pretty good 2-3 rd prospects that could develop into something good. Damn you Perrish Cox! Three and possible more could be there in the 2nd rd ~ Minnifield, Trumain Johnson and Josh Norman. Maybe one of these players will be our pick…

Defensive End isn’t a huge need if Fox considers Jason Hunter, Derrick Harvey or Jeremy Beal behind Ayers and Dumervil, but if the timing is right and Mellvin Ingram is still on the board they will jump and run to the podium with the pick. There are a feww in the following rounds I wouldn’t mind taking if we draft someone else. Cam Johnson, Vinnie Curry etc…

With our pick being 780 points worth I think EFX wouldn’t be bad off if they picked Ryan Tannenhill at 25 if he’s still there. Let him develop behind Tebow like Aaron Rodgers did behind Brett Farve and if Tebow’s production hit’s a below par ceiling then we have our man.

With all of that said, I wouldn’t mind EFX dealing out of the first rd down to an early 2nd, get another pick plus get DT/DE/CB we need…Drafting a DT in the 2nd could kepp Fox’s string of 10 years not drafting one in the first…

Your guess is as good as mine.

"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond

by bfree2bronc on Feb 14, 2012 1:33 PM MST reply actions  

Last year, the Broncos had interest in Marcel Dareus and Nick Fairley in the first round.

I don’t see any reason why they wouldn’t pick a DT at the end of round 1. Clearly, they know it is a need and will select a DT at 25 if it matches the value and I think it will.

Follow me on Twitter: @ballinnickcast
Xbox360 gamertag: SnipeMeHarder

by Nick Cast on Feb 14, 2012 1:38 PM MST up reply actions  

I know they did and that is what they said afterwards.

If Von Miller the elite athlete wasn’t there then we would have taken Darius at 2. They weren’t willing to morgage the farm for Fairly and that was sensable. With Elway running the show (if he chooses too) the Broncos philosophy of drafting a DT may indeed change and I for one welcome it with open arms, because we need a physical youth influence on the DLine. But again it will probably boil down to the BPA at 25 for them if they don’t trade out to the end of the first or early 2nd.

But, if DE Melvin Ingram is there, would you still draft, say, Cox, Worthy or Poe? Would they possess more talent than Ingram? Because that’s what it will basically all boil down to, taking the BPA.

"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond

by bfree2bronc on Feb 14, 2012 8:30 PM MST up reply actions  

I know that BCUb, but when was the last time Xanders drafted a DT in the first?

Can’t count Elway because last year was his first, but I would think Fox would have a huge say of what plays will be playing on his team. Don’t get wrong if I came off that way, and I love the checks and balances of the three. Free agency might give us some clues to who and what we may draft with who they sign…

"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond

by bfree2bronc on Feb 14, 2012 8:36 PM MST up reply actions  

I don't put much faith in small sample size analyses of who coaches picked in the past

there are a bazillion reasons why a DT might not have been the top of the draftboard when a team picked… There are by my count 13 “positions” on a team, so over a 10 year coaching career a 1 pick per year, even if a different position came up every year, you’d still have spots that weren’t picked… if the wheel of draft luck comes up with 2+ at the same position, that is even more likely that there will be “missing” positions.

Plus, some levelk of repitition is likely to happen, because unless every 1st round pick is a hit, and “misses” are likely to mean you still have a need there in future years… which could lead to the coach prioritizing that position again.

Basically, I think there is zero predictivity in looking at what has happened previously with 1st round picks. If the coach outright tells you he doesn’t think a position is worth a 1st round pick, or there is other factors (e.g., drafting TEs, Gs, Cs, RBs or Safeties at the top-end of the draft before the new CBA due to salary reasons), I would focus more on BPA at position of need.

If the coach doesn’t draft the person you think is BPA at need, that more likely means that they either didn’t think that position was as big a need as you thought, or the scouts liked a different player more… no conspiracy theory needed about coaches “not drafting” certain positions.

by cjfarls on Feb 14, 2012 7:29 PM MST up reply actions  

cj, I used to like you a lot, but now, I like you even more...

I’m definitely aware that drafting theories are nothing more than that, and if you know me, I’m always thinking outside the box. That’s what puts the spice in human beings. Sure we may draft a DT in the first and it wouldn’t bother me in the least, but I do think that some things based on previous settings are predictable, and can be counted as such. If EFX draft a DT then the theory is no more, just a percentage based on past practices.

One thing I look at when drafting the BPA is, which BPA would be taken based on highest need. For instance… If Fletcher Cox, or Lamar Miller, or Melvin Ingram were all three considered the BPA after all the analysis was given much study and evaluation then one must be chosen, but which one? Is the defensive tackle a higher need than runningback? Or DE? Looking at the roster and the talent we have at those three positions I might say RB is the greater need than a DT or DE. Any one of those positions might be upgraded in free agency and only a draftee for depth and development might be needed, so then what do you do? You’ve already re-signed the three FA DTs and you signed a stud DE in FA and did nothing with the RB position. It might get tricky, but at least we might have clues to who will be selected at 25.

With all considered I would guess EFX would draft Lamar Miller, not taking a chance that a Doug Martin, Chris Polk, David Wilson or Robert Turbine would be there when they draft later on…Make sense?

"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond

by bfree2bronc on Feb 14, 2012 9:32 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I am like cj

I think there are to many variables to “figure out” what our pick will be based on the past picks of Fox. However, I agree bfree that all positions are not considered equal in his eyes. The chance a a good RB will out weigh the chance at a good DT for coach Fox I’m afraid.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 15, 2012 5:24 AM MST up reply actions  

Every team every year is different...

Divisional matchups change, players retire or are cut, players have nagging injuries, players dont meet expectations, some exceed expectations as a surprise, FA and Cap causes roster issues, coordinators change, game loss analysis and on and on…So past performance, for the reasons you state and more doesnt mean squat for the draft. Every year is a new ball game…That said, scheme may have something to do with it -if Foxball needs two RBs and you only got one, well…..but still its a matter of who is available when your number is up…I think EFX will make the right call…I just like the process they use ans the way they make decisions…it gives us the best chance to get the right BPA guy..IMHO

by Denverkewl on Feb 15, 2012 5:53 AM MST up reply actions  

That's what it's all about right now.

We screw around doing our mocks which are useless. The bottom line is, will EFX do what we as fans hope they’ll do? I’m with you I think they will. I know it was only one year, but I just feel so much better than the McDescapade. IMO we are still looking to fill holes I thought we needed before his first draft. RB, CB, OC, MLB, DT, DE were the major weaknesses when Shanny left and still are. Man, he sucked. I’m glad they saw it as soon as they did and got him out of here. I would have kept wishing he was going to get better and we would have ended up like Detroit in their bad years.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 15, 2012 6:07 AM MST up reply actions  

Plus....

I like the fact that Elway is hands on….you can tell he just loves his job and puts the time in on film and travel. He has high expectations and makes changes – even in the FO – to improve. No one will get it 100%…but they do adjust…the whole NFL had Moore as the top safety last draft….he literally fell to us and without an off season he is lost. Most folks lose sight of the fact that Elway tried to move Orton before camp. but I hear Orton screwed the deal – the point is it was a bold move and he made the call…. Elway must also have liked the talent evaluators -hence the promotion. Says alot about whats happening behind the scenes. Fox also signaled there would be talent upgrades….I just like the flexibility they show to make gutsy moves….I just hope they dont trade up!

by Denverkewl on Feb 15, 2012 7:37 AM MST up reply actions  

They are having fun and making the necessary changes.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 15, 2012 11:03 AM MST up reply actions  

Believe it or not...

…I’m kind of hoping they trade up.

The more I look at this year’s class, the more it seems like there are some great talents in the Top 15 picks – some of whom could start for us at week 1.

Once you get past those Top 15, then the talent really flattens out. I don’t think there’s much difference between pick 16 and and pick 96.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 5:12 PM MST up reply actions  

There are a few players

I wouldn’t mind a trade up for. No I wouldn’t . Coples maybe is all.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 15, 2012 5:35 PM MST up reply actions  

I've got to mock it all out and see.

I’d trade up for Coples, Claiborne, Richardson, Lamar Miller and Zach Brown. Any one of those could start for us on Day 1 (we’d have to find a spot for Brown). I might even trade up for Peter Konz – not that I have an informed opinion of him, but lots of people say he’s going to be good. He could probably start in place of Walton on Day 1.

In my opinion, we have to land a starter in the first round. And the trouble is, with this class, that’s difficult to do at our draft position. Some positions are easier than others. We could draft a starting running back at 25.

Also, I’ve said elsewhere that no wideout will go in the Top 10. If this happens, then we could see some starting talent available at 25. Someone who could move Decker to third receiver. The trouble is, I think we could find a really good receiver in the third round – someone who could move Decker to third wideout.

We could also draft a low-quality starter at safety too. But…I think that’d be a waste.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 6:05 PM MST up reply actions  

Miller or Brown at #25

no trade up I like a bunch. The other 3 are the only ones heads and shoulders above the next in line. Those three would be worth it, but not from our position.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 15, 2012 6:30 PM MST up reply actions  

bfree

I think EFX is trying to build a carbon copy of the Giants / Lions fearsome pass rush. I keep hearing whispers and rumblings that we’re looking hardcore at Melvin Ingram (Pass Rusher – South Carolina). Size-wise, Ingram is in the mold of our own Robert Ayers, but he’s more athletic and has shown a great propensity to get after QB’s (at least more so than Ayers did).

If this happens, I won’t complain. For how many years did we have to watch Shanny (and McD after him) virtually ignore the front seven… namely the front four. Every time we would end up with a good D-Lineman, Shanny would drop them like a bad habit. Trevor Pryce? Bertrand Berry? Reggie Hayward? All good to great DE’s. Shanny’s idea of a DE was John Engleberger and Ebenezer Ekuban? C’MON MAN!!!

My ideal pick would be a penetrator DT, a CB, a RB (even though I normally hate them in the 1st), or an O-Lineman. What would happen to Ayers if Ingram is the pick? I realize we’d probably have to trade up to get him, but I can’t argue their eye for pass rushers so far.

"If you went to the Fair with this guy and you played that game where you have to throw the ball through the hole..... he may never get it through the hole, but he's still gonna be walking away with all the stuffed animals!" Prime's commentary on our very own Tim Tebow!!!

"As iron sharpens iron, so will one man sharpen another." The Bible, by way of Tim Tebow.

"If I had to choose between an abundance of football intelligence, or football wisdom, I'd choose wisdom every single time...... John Fox has enough football wisdom to be carried in a dump truck." Me!

by PaleHorse78 on Feb 14, 2012 7:39 PM MST up reply actions  

If John Fox hasn't learned anything by what former Carolina head coach Tom Coughlin left him when he took over then he never will.

Coughlin left him two stud DTs in Marcus Stroud and John Henderson and Fox basically let it go sour with injecting talented youth. Bad mistake imo, just like Shanny and his time here except for Trevor Price.

"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond

by bfree2bronc on Feb 14, 2012 9:41 PM MST up reply actions  

nope bfree

that was what Coughlin left Del Rio in Jacksonville. Foxy had Kris Jenkins and Brenson Buckner at DT, I believe. After Jenkins left, the only decent thing they had at DT was Ma’ake Kemoeatu for a couple years. Foxy always put 100% emphasis on DE’s, RB’s, OL, and LB’s.

"If you went to the Fair with this guy and you played that game where you have to throw the ball through the hole..... he may never get it through the hole, but he's still gonna be walking away with all the stuffed animals!" Prime's commentary on our very own Tim Tebow!!!

"As iron sharpens iron, so will one man sharpen another." The Bible, by way of Tim Tebow.

"If I had to choose between an abundance of football intelligence, or football wisdom, I'd choose wisdom every single time...... John Fox has enough football wisdom to be carried in a dump truck." Me!

by PaleHorse78 on Feb 15, 2012 10:33 AM MST up reply actions  

But Del Rio drafts DT's in the first round

It could be that Fox was constrained in his Carolina picks by a front office that wanted showier playmakers in the 1st round because that’s how a team sells tickets. A combo of Fox and del Rio provides a pretty hefty group of “defense first” arguments in the Denver front office – and

by yibberat on Feb 16, 2012 11:46 AM MST up reply actions  

Del Rio while HC of the Jags drafted 4 DTs and 10 DEs in 9 years

The DTs were drafted in rounds 3, 3, 4 and 5. The DEs – two in the 1st (Harvey and Alualu), 1 in the 2nd (Groves), 1 in the 4th, 3 in the 5th, 1 in the 6th and 2 in the 7th.

Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.

by DE_BroncoFan on Feb 16, 2012 1:26 PM MST up reply actions  

I vote no on signing any CB that reminds me of Willie Middlebrooks.

Tim Tebow is Denver's 2012 starting QB. I'm not even kind of sorry that offends some of you (including you Elway).

by McGeorge on Feb 14, 2012 2:29 PM MST reply actions  

which one is that?

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 14, 2012 5:28 PM MST up reply actions  

William Middleton

got it.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 14, 2012 8:37 PM MST up reply actions  

Is Willie Middlebrooks arguably the worst of Shanny's 1st round decisions?

I mean, there were other bad ones, but Middlebrooks was real weak bro’s.

"If you went to the Fair with this guy and you played that game where you have to throw the ball through the hole..... he may never get it through the hole, but he's still gonna be walking away with all the stuffed animals!" Prime's commentary on our very own Tim Tebow!!!

"As iron sharpens iron, so will one man sharpen another." The Bible, by way of Tim Tebow.

"If I had to choose between an abundance of football intelligence, or football wisdom, I'd choose wisdom every single time...... John Fox has enough football wisdom to be carried in a dump truck." Me!

by PaleHorse78 on Feb 14, 2012 7:42 PM MST up reply actions  

Marcus Nash would be worse wouldnt he?

Willie stuck around a while. So did Moss…

"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."

"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes" Douglas Adams

by orange&blue_aussie on Feb 14, 2012 8:00 PM MST up reply actions  

Great Post as always

One guy i watched this last year in AZ that i wouldn’t mind us going after is Richard Marshall, i think he was brought up alot last year here on MHR also. He played CB and Safety and let the cardinals secondary in tackles. He would be a very good nickel and spot starter.

by diehardbronco2 on Feb 14, 2012 3:47 PM MST reply actions  

I think we've got enough nickel and spot starters.

I’m sure your read on Marshall is right on. The trouble is, I think we have enough of those players in the form of Chris Harris, Squid and Cassius Vaughn.

We need a new starter opposite Champ. Can Chris Harris take his game to the next level? I wouldn’t bet against him.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 5:17 PM MST up reply actions  

Great article, Nick

Just think our real major need is at CB and you gave no enough level to discuss this. I agree about the part you say after resigning Bunkley and Thomas (and Ty Warren returning), this is not our major need anymore… I think that’s exactly why we should (and likely will) grab a 1st round CB.

This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue. GB².

by Fabio Broncos on Feb 14, 2012 3:55 PM MST reply actions  

Fabio

I agree..and also need a DT…THEN..we go from there..like a rb,wr.

by bronco4life on Feb 14, 2012 6:25 PM MST up reply actions  

Fabio

I may be wrong my friend, but I believe they’re trying to build up the pass rush before anything else. Champ, Harris, and some mediocre CB’s can be masked by a fearsome, violent pass rush. Don’t get me wrong… they understand we need some more CB’s, but it’s a lower priority to them than another pass rusher.

The Giants have got by for many years without elite CB play. Goodness… if Prince Amukamara can become what we all thought he could be, the G-Men are going to win some more Super Bowls. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a team strike gold on so many beast pass rushers in the draft – Tuck, Strahan, Umenyiora, Kiwanuka, and now Pierre-Paul. Nasty, nasty, nasty.

"If you went to the Fair with this guy and you played that game where you have to throw the ball through the hole..... he may never get it through the hole, but he's still gonna be walking away with all the stuffed animals!" Prime's commentary on our very own Tim Tebow!!!

"As iron sharpens iron, so will one man sharpen another." The Bible, by way of Tim Tebow.

"If I had to choose between an abundance of football intelligence, or football wisdom, I'd choose wisdom every single time...... John Fox has enough football wisdom to be carried in a dump truck." Me!

by PaleHorse78 on Feb 14, 2012 7:47 PM MST up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind to add a pass rusher DT or even DE

But man, it’s very painful to see Goodman being torched game after game…

This signature was sacked by Von Miller.
I bleed Orange & Blue. GB².

by Fabio Broncos on Feb 15, 2012 8:46 AM MST up reply actions  

Hope you're dead wrong.

The free agents you listed are bottom of the barrell, fringe NFL roster type of guys that would be, to me, like getting Marquand Manuel all over again. Lofa Tatupu couldn’t even get signed by a team this past year, and would be a longshot to make our roster even. Upgrade over Joe Mays even?

Middleton is the most encouraging name on your non-QBs list, but still not inspiring since we have three guys like him already on the roster (Thompson, Vaughn, Harris). The Broncos have roughly 50 million in cap space. Who we will pursue and who we will sign are two different arguments entirely. For instance, we pursued DeAngelo Williams last year, likely didn’t offer him close to what the Panthers did, but we still went after him. It’s not like we have a ton of big name in-house guys to re-sign, the best of which being our kicker.

I can see where you’re coming from, and you typically look at it as “glass half empty” but I tend to agree that the Broncos aren’t going to take a page out of anyone’s Madden 12 guide to building a franchise and sign all of the best, youngest free agents. I think most of our acquisitions will be of the bargain variety but that doesn’t mean we should ignore guys like Mario Williams, Brandon Carr, Matt Forte, Vincent Jackson, or Dwayne Bowe just because we want to build through the draft. The Broncos are not in a hurry to be contenders but they have to see how lucky we were to win 8 games last year and how maintaining team chemistry while adding important pieces is huge.

For instance, we’re probably not going to get a corner at 25 overall who is going to give us what Brandon Carr can potentially give us, which is a seamless transition for Champ to move to safety and build at corner. More likely, he would bridge the gap at #1 corner and allow another draft choice to be the future #2.

Adding pieces through free agency doesn’t equal wins, but I doubt Houston regrets dipping into their pocket books for a guy like Jonathan Joseph, who helped make them the most dominant D, arguably, in the AFC.

Not sure Chicago regrets picking up Julius Peppers and getting to the NFC title game.

The Broncos have a plan in place, but it shouldn’t require only going after the worst free agents, which is the plan that you have laid out in my opinion.

by Sayre Bedinger on Feb 14, 2012 6:07 PM MST reply actions   1 recs

Pretty much agree Sayre, why get the dregs of another team...

"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond

by bfree2bronc on Feb 14, 2012 9:52 PM MST up reply actions  

Agree

These FA’s tend to look like cheap for cheap’s sake

by yibberat on Feb 16, 2012 11:50 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree with Sayre here

I think we have both the potential and the motivation to make a bigger splash in free agency than the OP does.

"Bombs dropping down overhead. Underground. It's instilled to want to live." -EV

by sadaraine on Feb 16, 2012 3:08 PM MST up reply actions  

Nick I see alot of what your saying but

As a BRONCO4LIFE fan I think we need to get CB in the first round..then a DT…now we will need another WR..because I see Eddie gone…after that a RB..now as far as QB..J.J. is ok BUT I would go after D.D. he would fit the bill and can play more than one postion to help Tebow IF he sarts..if not..the I think Dixon could…I am new on this post so forgive me if I sound like a nut!!!!!

by bronco4life on Feb 14, 2012 6:22 PM MST reply actions  

You don't sound like a nut.

I think you’ve nailed our needs really well.

Regarding a replacement for Goodman…the trouble is, short of Mo Claiborne out of LSU, there aren’t any CBs in this draft who can step in and start for us on Day 1 (that’s my opinion and others likely disagree with me).

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 5:36 PM MST up reply actions  

good stuff here

CB to me is by far our most dire need (assuming we resign Bunk and Thomas)… goody is done, Champ is rapidly slowing down, and Harris/Squid/Vaughn have never shown starting caliber play… our depth is maybe okay at CB, but a starting-caliber FA or high draft pick is a critical need. I’d love to go after Carr, etc. or spend a 1st rounder there.

Tatupu makes a lot of sense if he’s finally healthy and not too expensive. He may never be player he was, but he’s a great insurance policy to Irving not developing.

If we lose both Bunk and Thomas, DT rapidly shoots up to the top of the need list… Big Vick/McBein/Unrein/Warren is not a group I feel comfortable with going into camp.

by cjfarls on Feb 14, 2012 7:47 PM MST reply actions  

I agree with your thinking, especially on NOT expecting big name FA signings

And on the value of 1st round RB, plus not giving up on Nate Irving

by si_ice on Feb 14, 2012 8:22 PM MST reply actions  

The broncos had no cap last season,

That’s why there were only value signings. The difference in cap this off season compared to last is huge. The broncos have some 27 million this off season and I imagine they’ll attempt to use it.Sure there will be more value signings and resignings of or own players ie Clady, but there will still be available cap especially with the possibility of the new cap specialist restructuring some existing contacts to free up even more cap ie Dj Williams.. Just saying, I expect at least one big sign.

by e_saites on Feb 14, 2012 9:14 PM MST via Android app reply actions  

dont agree

This topic has no real answer that I can find but I have read both accounts where the Broncos had plenty of cap space and were the low spenders and the opposite.

he's tall, blonde, smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!

by Scrappy Bill on Feb 14, 2012 10:51 PM MST up reply actions  

I agree with Scrappy.

Confusing issue. Given Bowlen’s recent history, it wouldn’t surprise me if they continued to go cheap.

It sucks; because once he got his stadium, the purse strings closed.

There's no way Khloe's a Kardashian. No frickin' way.

by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 15, 2012 5:39 PM MST up reply actions  

Rec'd. Only because I admire high you always pull stuff out of your....

Lofa Tatupu? Really? Wow! I still remember everyone saying how Niko Koutuvides was going to be our next great MLB, and lo and behold I see him pullin ST duty in the Super Bowl. I give you props for pulling out Lofa, I forgot about the guy. He actually is visiting the Saints right now, which I’m not sure how he would fit in with Vilma, but I think your suggestion has merit. MLB, CB, and DT are positions of need, probably more based on BPA than anything else. However, I do agree that EFX could grab a pass rushing beast at DE if they feel one is BPA with 1st pick.

by atwater27rules on Feb 14, 2012 9:20 PM MST reply actions  

Congrats everyone

This topic has been a joy to read.

Great OP, great comments, all respectful and smart. This is why i love reading MHR.

Now back to figuring out why my cash flow sucks…

he's tall, blonde, smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!

by Scrappy Bill on Feb 14, 2012 10:53 PM MST reply actions  

Beadles

I was near outrage when they drafted him, but I think you’re being a little hard on him. He needs to work to get functionally stronger, but the guy is a beast on the move and he showed some serious vinegar as the season wore on. He’s going to continue to develop, and he’ll be considered an asset before all is said and done.

I think Denver will make one big FA acquisition. I’m thinking Grimes, Carr or Lynch. Probably Carr— he upgrades the secondary significantly and weakens the other AFC riser all in the same motion. I think they have an interest in proving that Bowlen is willing to try to win, as once was a forgone conclusion.

by Pigskin on Feb 14, 2012 11:33 PM MST reply actions  

The best thing Denver could do would be to steal some quality free agents from division rivals.

Imagine if we could pull Carr from the Chiefs, and either Tolbert from the Chargers, or Bush from the Raiders. It would be a good move to overpay those players by a small amount rather than paying less money for a FA from a non-division rival.

Oh, you were finished? Oh, well, allow me to retort!
--Jules Winnfield

by GrizBronc on Feb 15, 2012 10:03 AM MST up reply actions  

Trade down from #25 scenarios; What happens if Ryan Tannehill is available at #25?

Yes they may select him but IMO trade down better.
Washington – If they miss out on Peyton Manning, Matt Flynn, Robert Griffin, they’ll have to either trade down from No. 6 or move up from no. 38 to acquire Ryan Tannehill.
Jacksonville – at no. 7 do they take BPA or focus on Gabbert shortcomings. Same question at no. 39.
Miami – at no. 8 do they have Manning, Flynn or a plan for no. 42
Philadelphia – It’s very possible that the Eagles will spend a Day 2 selection on a quarterback. Their current starter will be 32 soon, while Mike Kafka is just backup material.
New York – the front office may spend a Day 2 selection on a quarterback to provide some competition.
Denver then can select the following, with the Round & Time
*Stephon Gilmore CB South Carolina Jr 6-1 193 2 4.52
*Brock Osweiler QB Arizona State Jr 6-7 240 2-3 4.83
*Bernard Pierce RB Temple Jr 6-0 218 3 4.59
*Marcus Forston DT Miami (Fla.) rJr 6-3 300 2-3 4.95

Kreese and Lawrence will decide if Tim Tebow can develop into our future.
Bronco fan since 1966. Current biggest Bronco fan in Vegas, living the good life.

by DLMyers on Feb 15, 2012 12:46 PM MST reply actions  

Agree and disagree

History is generally the best indicator of future events. I think it’s wise to look at the past as predictor of future, but with just one year with Elway and Fox at the helm, I think it should come with a warning this time. The sample size is enormously small.

Most importantly, I think there was one major fact that affected all signings last year and served as a guide to our offseason….. we were cash-poor. We were paying much money to players that were no longer playing. Dumervil and Kuper were signed to a big contract the year prior without any bonuses, which meant that their 2011 salaries were each millions of dollars higher. Tim Tebow’s major signing bonuses (not to mention a big play-time bonus) was deferred to 2012 and made over $7M that year total. DT was the other 2011 1st round draft choice with his signing bonus delayed to 2012. We also ended up paying Orton for most of the season. We released Bannan and J-Wall with them still being owed guaranteed money. Jharivs Green was still being paid. The list goes on.

POint is that tthe 2011 regime put the 2012 regime in a crappy position as far as actual cash being spent. That greatly affected how the Broncos were forced to approach free agent acquisitions. Specifically, of all the free agent signings only Warren and McGahee were given signing bonuses. They’re also the only two that got multi-year deals. The reason is clear, IMO…. the team simply didn’t have the cash to spend. The cash budget is set at around what the cap budget is set at, and the team was simply strapped on the cash side.

So I guess what I’m saying is that I see very clear reasons to point at as to why the team approached last year’s FAs the way they did. And I see no reason to believe that last year’s trend will continue. We’re not cash strapped this year. I could see us making moves in FA that go completely against last year’s model.

Personally, I’d like to see a RB be a major FA addition. For $5M per year in FA you can add a star RB to be our starter/time share back with McGahee. You can then spend your first-round pick on a CB that would have cost you $10M/yr in FA.

I'm officially an idiot. We didn't need Quinn to win dumbass. (Slap to the face!) Great job Tebow and Team! After years of mediocrity we fans deserve a pat on the back for staying true, too. So I hereby take credit for this win for being such a great fan... even having doubted Him once ;D

by Rodney A on Feb 15, 2012 6:16 PM MST reply actions  

Very smart.

So who is this next Champ Bailey?

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 15, 2012 6:34 PM MST up reply actions  

Good question :)

I still like Dre, but he’s really climbed the boards as our draft position kept sliding back over the last couple months. I think if it’s the 2nd round pick, I’d go with Chase. In the first round, I think the CBs I like will be gone, so I’d go with Brandon Thompson (assuming a big FA running back is added).

I'm officially an idiot. We didn't need Quinn to win dumbass. (Slap to the face!) Great job Tebow and Team! After years of mediocrity we fans deserve a pat on the back for staying true, too. So I hereby take credit for this win for being such a great fan... even having doubted Him once ;D

by Rodney A on Feb 15, 2012 7:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Alright bud.

good to see you around again.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 15, 2012 7:23 PM MST up reply actions  

Thanks

I'm officially an idiot. We didn't need Quinn to win dumbass. (Slap to the face!) Great job Tebow and Team! After years of mediocrity we fans deserve a pat on the back for staying true, too. So I hereby take credit for this win for being such a great fan... even having doubted Him once ;D

by Rodney A on Feb 15, 2012 7:27 PM MST up reply actions  

I've been popping in and out, haven't had much time after starting a new job recently

I'm officially an idiot. We didn't need Quinn to win dumbass. (Slap to the face!) Great job Tebow and Team! After years of mediocrity we fans deserve a pat on the back for staying true, too. So I hereby take credit for this win for being such a great fan... even having doubted Him once ;D

by Rodney A on Feb 15, 2012 7:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Frickin job's cuttin into MHR time.

Gotta quit.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 15, 2012 7:58 PM MST up reply actions  

lol +58

I'm officially an idiot. We didn't need Quinn to win dumbass. (Slap to the face!) Great job Tebow and Team! After years of mediocrity we fans deserve a pat on the back for staying true, too. So I hereby take credit for this win for being such a great fan... even having doubted Him once ;D

by Rodney A on Feb 15, 2012 8:05 PM MST up reply actions  

lol

love your sig. I also thought your idea had merit, needed or not ;D

Go Broncos!
2011 AFC West Champions

by Sean in Pa. on Feb 16, 2012 5:45 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree with Sean.

Don’t beat yourself up over it. Blame me I put the idea in your head.

"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow

by Digger24 on Feb 16, 2012 8:33 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

P1_plummer_small
For those Bronco Fans Who have served....
Imgres_small
Are You Nuts? No Plan B?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Studying the Quarterback Position
Imgres_small
Running Backs, The Shortest Tenured Position.
Angels_small
Moreno Out the Door this Offseason
Small
What Do You Expect From Our Draftees ?
Small
An in depth look at "PLAN A"
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick Really Worth? Pt. 2.
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
Glad for Gronkowski
Imgres_small
What's A Draft Pick REALLY Worth?
Index_small
Nate Irving!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Position Coach

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Flag_canada_small Colby

Broncos-von-miller_small Scotty Payne

Ph_small BroncoPH

Small zsheely

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall