Some Clarification is in Order: What Position is Worth a 1st Rounder?
The NFL Combine is upon us, the draft is near, and while I normally leave those topics up to many of the other, much smarter, draft gurus of MHR, but as I was doing my own prep for the draft and free agency I had a few questions about positional value. One aspect of the NFL that is ignored, or overlooked, is the value side in terms of a positions value in the draft. Often times teams will draft a position just because that player may be the best available in skill set or may fill a huge need. And while I'm not disputing either method of drafting, I want to take a look at what positions make the most of being a 1st rounder. By that I mean I will examine which positions are best valued in the 1st round. Take offensive tackle and running back, since 2000, of all Pro Bowl offensive tackles, they average the draft position of the early 2nd round while all Pro Bowl running backs since 2000 averaged the draft position of the late 3rd round. This means that an offensive tackles is more valuable in the 1st than a running back.
Now we'll be doing this for each position. I'll try and keep it simple, and since this is meant as a quick update rather than a full study. This is rather just something to chew on while we get ready for the draft.
Breakdown and Table:
To start off, like I mentioned in the introduction, I'll be going back to 2000 and looking at Pro Bowl and All-Pro players. To look at each positions I looked at each player. Once I had the list of each Pro Bowler and All-Pro at a position I'd average the draft position of each Pro Bowler and record that in the table then I'd do the same for All-Pro players. It's a fairly simple system. So if a position has a Pro Bowl value of 3.2 that means they are early 3rd round picks while a 1.7 would be a late 1st rounder. With that settled, lets get to the table.
| Position | Average Pro Bowl Value | Average All-Pro Value |
|---|---|---|
| QB | 3.6 | 3.7 |
| RB | 3.2 | 3.4 |
| OT | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| OG | 3.2 | 2.6 |
| C | 4.4 | 2.9 |
| TE | 3.7 | 2.8 |
| WR | 3.5 | 3.1 |
| Average | 3.4 | 2.9 |
| DT | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| DE | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| OLB | 2.8 | 2.3 |
| ILB | 3 | 1.7 |
| CB | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| S | 3.1 | 1.9 |
| Average | 2.7 | 2.0 |
| K | 6.9 | 7.3 |
| P | 6.6 | 5.3 |
| Average | 6.8 | 6.3 |
Notes:
- Top 5 in Pro Bowls for OT's, 3 are top 5 picks, 4 are top 10 picks and all were 2nd round or earlier. In the top 10, 8 are 1st rounders and only 1 is below the 2nd round. Of all the 14 All-Pro OT's since 2000, 11 are 1st round picks and only 1 is below the 2nd round.
- Center is surprisingly low, with the average Pro Bowl value at 4.4, and the top 5 players in Pro Bowls, none are 1st round picks. But when it comes to All-Pro, it does get closer to the rest of the offensive line with 2.9.
- While the WR position doesn't really require an early round player to have a solid Pro Bowl career, of the top 10 in Pro Bowls, 6 were 1st round picks, so to get the best of the best, early picks pay off.
- Extremely talented teams are said to build the trenches then move out, it's true. As we've mentioned about offensive lineman, the same holds true for defensive lineman. Pro Bowl DT's and DE's both average a round value of 2.4 and DT averages and All-Pro value of 2.2 and DE's All-Pro value is 1.9.
- Just looking at defensive positions versus defensive positions, defensive positions are much more valuable, averaging a Pro Bowl value of 2.7 compared to the 3.4 of the offensive positions. If we look at All-Pro value we see a bigger difference, 2.0 for defense compared to 2.9 for offense.
- Just looking at this, if I am a GM, I'm only really using 1st or 2nd rounders on lineman on both sides or any defensive positions. I'm only drafting other offensive positions if I have a huge need or it's a great value.
So there you go, hope this was a bit educational and helped you get a bigger picture of some meta-football analysis. While it's hardly as indepth as it could be, it's meant more as a quick educational piece about draft value.
57 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice work
Now I really want BPA at either Front4 or CB with the 25th pick. But I still want a RB with the 57th. We need alot more talent at that position considering how important they are to us.
luckily im a bronco and a blazer fan
Thanks for your thoughts
And I agree with you on what to use the 1st round for, defense is much better value and we could seriously use a DT, MLB or DB. As for RB in the 2nd, while it’s a tough choice, I do think we should add a RB to compete with Moreno and Ball for the #2 and #3 spot, and I think Doug Martin in the 2nd or LaMichael James in the 3rd or 4th.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
The values would indicate that the RB position would be around the 2nd rd for the best fit...
But, looking at the Denver Broncos and the priority positions one could say that RB is the greatest priority. The Broncos have talented DT/DEs this is true, though not talented enough to get the penetration to the QB like Fox would want, so I think that position(s) is a priority. Kevin Vickerson for one surprised me when he said he was trimming down, but when he said he was taking in excess of 30lbs off that concerned me about his athleticism (limited as it is), and it showed right away. His play for the games he played was lackluster to say the least and our suspicions were caught on camera right before our eyes. Wheter he stays on the team or not, his position can be upgraded in the draft or FA. Ty Warren is another DT that EFX had high hopes for and Fox voiced that he still holds hope for him. That may be, but missing a couple of years to injuries is concerning to say the least. Money spent wrong imo. Bunkley/Thomas? Pretty solid against the run, but lacked in collapsing OLines. That doesn’t help the Broncos’ DEs in the least bit, but are needed, I think we will try to re-sign both. Ryan McBean? Is he finally getting it. Seemed to be, but it has been a hard road to hoe for him. The others? Don’t hold much hope for those. So we have 5 DTs that I count with one mediocre pass rusher…One of the top priorities as Fox stated.
On the RB side, the Broncos are lacking that down hill rusher that has breakaway speed, and counting on Knowshon Moreno is like counting on the government to create jobs. Don’t hold your breath. McGahee is on the downhill side of his career even though he was great at times playing last year. Rotational players like Ball and Johnson are just that and not much more. Fanning? Who knows? So, with the Broncos rushing attack we only have one (McGahee the Moses). To me that makes this position a higher priority that DE/DT just because of the talent we have on board. EFX may opt for FA for a veteran RB like they did with McGahee, and that’s great, but if we don’t see that then guess what…Yeah…Let a David Wilson or a Lamar Miller slide to 25 and bang!!!
"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond
Follow @bfree2bronc
A quick thought on the pass rush
When both Doom and Miller were healthy the Broncos ranked 7th in sacks per drop back. If we were to add a pressure creator, it would be from the inside, either at MLB or DT, because currently our outside players (Doom, Ayers, Miller, Williams) are all built well and the only real replaceable player could be Ayers and removing him will weaken our run defense since he was the best outside player against the run.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
This is true and watching the Texans for a little bit today, I could see all of the front guys getting penetration on any given play.
That’s what bothers me with our DTs they ain’t cutting it in that part of their play. Watching some of the better QBs just step up in the pocket for that extra split second or look and then complete the throw is quite bothersome. Oh, and I agree that we need a ILBer who is smart enough to read offenses. Hoping that Irving becomes that man, but if he isn’t we’ll have to go to the well one more time…
"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond
Follow @bfree2bronc
Excellent analogy and agree wholeheartedy on 1st-2nd rd selections.
From my own perspective it would seem like a no-brainer to select a DLineman with the first pick, and that is a great possibility. Whether the player is a DT or DE matters to me, it will say that the DLine is the priority that Fox mentioned. There will be some nice pieces there at 25 and the Broncos have no need to panic and trade up, they just need to be patient in the rebuilding process.
Other than that, EFX may opt to wait until the 2nd rd for the DLine figuring that some will be there that are close are equivalent to the first rounders they missed on. In that case EFX may address another priority position and that might be the RB position. With Trent Richard already gone to bed after partying, I see maybe David Wilson and Lamar Miller as the only 1st rd talents that are measured here. The sample size is much smaller than DT/DE for firsts. Both Miller and Wilson could easily slide to us at 25 and i wouldn’t put it past EFX to pull the trigger here with all the 2nd-3rd rd DT/DEs that probably will be available.
OT will not be a priority pick in the first unless one of the top 2-3 slide that far. I doubt it.
CB will be addressed from 2nd rd – through the end of the draft, there are a bleve of them in this draft that have specifice talents. Same with the ILB, this is a weak draft in that area and we drafted 3 last year to develop for the future. Folks have to use common sense and not think with their…hearts on this one. There are some talented ILBer who will probably be around from the 3rd on and I think EFX will draft one, just not early.
All in all, I think we will draft a position player with the first pick with one of the 3 positions…DT/DE/RB…
"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond
Follow @bfree2bronc
Thanks for your thoughts
And I wasn’t suggesting that we, specifically, should draft any one positions. I agree that offensive line isn’t a priority, though it could be next season if they don’t continue to improve on the trend of getting better. I like your priorities, though my order would go DT/CB/RB.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Mine too, but that sneaking suspicion tells me RB, where I hope DT is addressed.
"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond
Follow @bfree2bronc
Either way, it will be interesting, that's for sure.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Super interesting, but can I add a suggestion
I would like to see what the QB position would be worth without a decade of Tom Brady, not saying he shouldn’t be looked at, but that is 10 years in the Pro Bowl and (off the top of my head) 3-5 all pro nods. I would think it would be a lot higher. Nonetheless This was cool good job.
While Brady was an outlier with his 6 Pro Bowls and 2 All-Pros
That same logic could apply to Manning and his 11 Pro Bowls and 5 All-Pros. There is really is no way to offset the massive difference between Manning and Brady, but if I go back much farther, it messes with the current norms of the NFL. The QB position was downplayed by Brady, but there were other QB’s like Warner (3 PB, 1 AP), Garcia (4 PB), Hasselbeck (3 PB) and others who were taken later. But this did apply to multiple positions, OT for one, had Jason Peters who had 4 PB and 1 AP but went undrafted. Or take Antonio Gates going undrafted but having 7 PB and 3 AP.
I can understand the desire to remove outliers, but after doing so, almost all the positions go up, especially OT, TE, and OLB, which would all go up by nearly half a round while removing the top outliers only moves the QB value up about .23
Thanks for your comment though, and I thought about doing that, but it would change the difference between positions, rather it would raise them all up higher.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Feb 22, 2012 6:04 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I tried a variety of ideas
But few changed the numbers to separate any one position from it’s current spot. This is mostly because so many of the data points are close enough to the mean, the median doesn’t alter much. The position though that did benefit the most was offensive tackle and outside linebacker while QB really didn’t change much.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Ya most OT's are easy to evaluate so therefore the really good ones get drafted early.
The olb surprises me tho.
Makes sense
I figured something like that would happen, and I in no ways was questioning it, I just thought it would be an interesting look because of how important the quarterback position is. But really the qb position is just as hit and miss as anywhere else it is just important. Again, really good article thanks for the good work.
I enjoy comments that ask me to dig further
So I appreciate your thoughts.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
So in other words
We need three 1st round picks. :)
Character may be manifested in the great moments but it is made in the small ones -- Philip Brooks
My ship finally came in, but it was the Kobayashi Maru.
Follow @MHR_KaptainKirk
KaptainKirk on FaceBook
Haha yes
We need the opposite draft strategy of Oakland, let’s keep out 1st rounders instead of trading them.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
McD had them, and what did he do with them?
In his first year, 2009, he used 3 1st round picks (Moreno, Ayers, traded for Phonz). Oh well, water under the bridge
Well Xanders was around for that as well
Let’s hope that was a blip not a trend.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
How much influence do you think Xanders had with Little Napoleon pounding on the table declaring he's za coach?
Not much is what Xanders stated in an interview last year…
"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond
Follow @bfree2bronc
Xanders
speaks with forked tongue. He wanted to distance himself when it was popular to do so.
My take? BX is an emprty suit.
GB 2
I don't really get that where some people might.
He definitely doesn’t hold the power that some of the other GMs around the league do, and that maybe his choice or the organizations choice. I like what we have now in the triumphant of EFX. Checks and balances. When we hear little words from Xanders and then from some of the players of how things were around Dove Valley, it doesn’t leave much for the imagination for me. I don’t consider myself a pyschologist or anything close to it, but I’m very street wise and have been around.
"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond
Follow @bfree2bronc
Xanders did everything he could to distance himself from McD
If he really had nothing to do with our moves in 2009 and 2010, why was he on the pay role?
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Packers agreed to terms with TE Jermichael Finley.
"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow
Good for them, Rodgers needs all to weapons he can get...
"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond
Follow @bfree2bronc
I just thought some of the ones who mocked him to the Broncos would like to know.
"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow
Yeah, I hear ya Digger...He is a solid player.
"You hate to think you have to censor your language to meet other people's lack of understanding" -Julian Bond
Follow @bfree2bronc
He was never going to Denver to begin with. But I'm ready to hear about our own resignings
All anxious to hear who we resign. We have a lot of work to do with our own FAs. Time’s ticking and we’ve not signed anyone yet. Makes me a little nervous.
Interesting side note to this.
Now they can franchise Flynn. Wouldn’t it be funny if they do that and no other team wants him for that price and they’re stuck with him.
"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow
I’m not quite following your train of thought here. Why would they franchise tag Flynn? By definition, wouldn’t that make the team stuck with him regardless of whatever any other team is willing to pay?
Bel15ve
I'm just relaying what rotoworld said their plan was.
To franchise him and someone matches it and gives up the draft picks. Like NE did with Cassel. I added that I think it would be cool if they got stuck with him instead.
"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow
Ah gotcha
It’ll be interesting to see where Flynn winds up. Has a player ever changed his value more in one game than Matt Flynn?
Bel15ve
Great article mate. Thanks!
Foxy...you WERE on the hot seat, but you fooled me you rascally old deveil...keep building that team mate!
"Tebow is a special player. I have never seen a player quite like him in my whole career! I’m gonna play all out for the guy! I know he will be out there giving 110% every play every week, so I’m gonna give 120%!:
Champ Bailey.
T.D.
Do you think there would be any chance we would take Mike Adams at #25? if I read your work right, it says we should if we can.
"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow
While I think he's talented
I don’t see us taking an offensive lineman, mostly because chemistry and time together are so vital and as the season went on they slowly improved. While I do think offensive line will be an area of interest as the season goes on to see if guys like Beadles are the long term solution.
But as for applying this model to the Broncos, while offensive lineman are among the best value, I feel that with such huge needs at defensive tackle and defensive back, two other positions that are great value as well in the early rounds.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
I agree
We should focus on defense early. We need a CB/DT/LB. We can get a RB/QB in the 4th or later. I am always OK eith drafting an o-lineman early tho.
If we got Adams we could trade Clady before he
gets a new contract.
"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow
That's true
But Clady’s play has been on the downturn and isn’t seen as a top LT and wouldn’t garner much of a trade, especially with his struggles this season. If he had been playing at his old level, he’d be a great value to trade, but with his issues the past two seasons, he’s not worth what he used to be.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Maybe not worth what he was before the knee
went out, but he hasn’t missed a game. He is still elite. He could garner quite a good price from a team that had their LT go down in TC and like I said we wouldn’t have to sign him up for the big time 2nd contract. I’d say we could at least get a 1st from a team expecting to be a contender or a 2nd from a bad team.
"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow
OTs
won in your reserch as what to use your 1st round pick on. If we go BPA and Adams is there we should take him. Period. Then offer Clady as trade bait and see what is offered. Or as others have suggested play Adams at RT and move Franklin in to RG. Kuper to LG when healthy and Beadles utility guy. We were very lucky last year none of the OL got hurt.
"I am not better than anyone else just because I play football."
Tim Tebow
My biggest issue is
If Clady is at the level you believe him to be, why would we downgrade at a position for a 2nd? I’m fine with BPA at times, but when BPA means you are downgrading at a position, why would you do it? I’m just not big on inserting a guy into a squad the is getting better and gelling. While I wouldn’t be upset if we drafted him, I’d still prefer we stick with this offensive line this season and after that we can assess the value of the current lineman we have.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
by Topher Doll on Feb 22, 2012 11:20 PM MST up reply actions
I hope EFX considers this type of stuff.
Occasionally, you’ll hear Ted Sundquist talk in these terms. I don’t know if he’s the exception or the norm.
I think this kind of exercise is very constructive. I can’t help but wonder if I played some role in your motivation to look at this. Since I’ve been such a Lamar Miller zealot, advocating drafting him at nearly any cost.
Regardless, I think you’d find this site fascinating. You might already be aware of it, but I just recently discovered it myself. This guy devotes his life to considering the draft by the numbers. To my knowledge, he doesn’t do any player scouting or anything; he only assesses where each position should be taken, average position life spans and that type of stuff. The time to first start stuff is incredible.
By the way, I should say I have no affiliation with the man at all.
Yesterday, he did the same thing you did; but looked at it through a different lens. Rather than Pro Bowlers and All-Pros, he considered “Games Started By Playing Position.” I think this is a reasonable criteria since GMs are looking for immediate starters in the first two rounds and if they happen to land Pro-Bowlers or All-Pros then that’s gravy (obviously hopes are higher the closer you get to the #1 overall pick).
I won’t summarize the entire article, only the first round stuff. He found the following (here’s how you read the table, of the 2560 games played in the last 5 years 49% of them were started by a quarterback selected in the first round):
Quarterback – 49%
RB – 32%
WR – 29%
TE – 25%
OL – 22%
DL – 33%
LB – 24%
DB – 25%
ALL – 27%
Incredibly, 21% of the games started by running backs were started by UNDRAFTED FREE AGENTS!
I think there might be some ego protection mechanisms at work given the time frame. It’s possible, since this is only five years, there might be some pig-headedness in play. The ol’ “We spent a first round pick on this bastard, so we’re not giving up on him yet!” mentality. But the dude also looked at 10- and 20-year starts as well.
Anyway, I’d recommend checking it out when you have time. But be careful: It’s a good site.
It's like you're dreamin' about gorgonzola cheese when it's clearly brie time, baby!.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 22, 2012 9:07 PM MST reply actions
Thanks for the comment
And games started is another way solid way to look at it, and I have spent time at Draft Metrics, it’s a better measurement of Utility, as in the teams gets the most use of the players they select, whereas my method rather looks at top tier talent rather the starter talent, but both have uses, depending on what you want to look at. Other metrics that could be used is Approximate Value done by Pro Football Reference or other advanced metrics from sites like Football Outsiders or Advanced NFL Stats.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
By the way, nice job.
It's like you're dreamin' about gorgonzola cheese when it's clearly brie time, baby!.
by Agent Jerry Fletcher on Feb 22, 2012 9:09 PM MST reply actions
Great stuff Topher
I’d really need to sit down and consider these stats. I especially liked your explanation of our need for interior defensive linemen, specifically a MLB to compliment our powerful edge attack. Our struggles in middle pass rush were really highlighted when we played more powerful offenses like the Patriots. It’d be nice to get a stud MLB to help fix that.
What are you thoughts about the idea that the MLB position is that hardest to play as it requires the most “football intelligence” to read the offense and thus it takes the average drafted player a few more years to reach full potential? Do you think we continue to develop Irving but still draft another guy pretty high, or give Irving his time to develop and grab, say, a CB instead?
Bel15ve
Thanks BroncoPH
As for the MLB position, in the 4-3, it’s a very tough position to play, and that is why there is such a massive difference in playing level, same can be said for FS in the league. When you think of great MLB’s there are 5-7 names, after that most MLB’s that come to mind are bad, there’s not a lot of grey space. The MLB, and to a less extent the FS, requires a lot of instinct and mental ability to react so well. That is what separates guys like Urlacher and Lewis, because of that hard-to-find talent they are just head and shoulders above others. That is also what makes them hard to find. Mays is a solid MLB, but because he lacks the instinct and mental level, he just can’t compare to those great MLB’s. Add in being forced be be the best coverage linebacker, MLB has the tough job of any linebacker.
As for Irving, there is a reason he wasn’t an early round pick, he’s similar to Mays as in he’s a strong, physical run stopper, but seems to lack those skills that would set him apart from the rest. So as for the MLB position, I’d rather keep Mays and have Irving and him compete and develop for the job. If neither player improves, then draft a MLB next draft.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
agree about your 1st and 2nd picks on D and O line. That we continue to avoid DTs early flys in the face of conventional wisdom… And what would you know, we’ve had a bad to crappy D for a long long long time. I wonder why? Actually, I don’t. Stop wasting high picks on Moore, McBath, Phonz and the like. Start drafting DTs and DEs early. Just don’t let Shanny pick them.
Tim Tebow is Denver's 2012 starting QB. I'm not even kind of sorry that offends some of you (including you Elway).
Interesting Post
Your points regarding Centers I think is an interesting one. It seems to me that there is a trend moving towards picking Centers in the 1st round where few if any were before. These guys, Mangold, Mack, Wood, Pouncey are emerging as the elite in their position. I was wondering if you had observed that whilst you were putting this together?
I think this is a good guide for people to consider but would also like to see another column which shows how many 1st round pro bowl and All Pros from each position there are as well as how many players from that position were drafted. It seems some people might see a stat like this and suggest that you should write off a position immediately based on averages.
"The Holy Writ of Gloucester Rugby Club demands: first, that the forwards shall win the ball; second, that the forwards shall keep the ball; and third, the backs shall buy the beer." - Doug Ibbotson
In relation to centers going earlier and earlier
I didn’t see that trend, but the last draft may have been the beginning of the trend.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
Nice post. I appreciate the amount of work that went into this.
Numerically, did you count an UDFA as an “8” for the statistical analysis?
Win the individual battles at the LOS - all else flows from that.
Good question
It depended on the years, I put their draft position as the last round plus one of the season. So for almost all the UDFA I gave them an “8” for their round.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
I can tell you which positions aren't worth a 1st Rounder for Us
FB, RB, TE, P, and K
Everything else, in my opinion, is fair game and could understand the pick this year
A baseball park is the one place where a man's wife doesn't mind his getting excited over somebody else's curves






































