sure i want brockers, still or cox. but the more i read about stephon gilmore, the more i like him. size, speed, he's physical, coachable -- i wouldn't be disappointed at all if we took him 25.
vitamin rich observations on a slow thursday after the comine
i am off the konz bandwagon. not that there was much of a bandwagon. 18 reps? poe did 22 -- with his left hand. and konz says he's media ready? sequence is everything. socks, then shoes. career, then celebrity color commentator. sheesh.
vontaze clarett, i mean maurice burfict, i mean mister big hot pile of needy ego drivel. we better not draft him in the third.
jenkins talks a good game. i'd still prefer gilmore.
poe is amazing. just because he looks like a 34 guy doesn't mean he wouldn't flourish with us. fast is fast, agile is agile.
i'm not much of a draft guy. there are people here who know waaaay more than me, thanks all. but that has yet to stop me. for round one, says here we won't get a shot a kirkpatrick, brockers, still or poe, letting us choose between cox, worthy, jenkins and gilmore. my preference? trade down. short of that? cox, then gilmore, worthy, then jenkins.