Conventional wisdom on Manning

From the latest developments, it seems chances of Peyton Manning heading to Denver are at least very high. Elway said he wants a pocket passer and there may've never been a better one than Manning. This explains why the team would want Manning.

Now, Manning may also be interested in Denver. His other top suitors are Miami and Washington. In Washington, he'd have to play his brother Eli twice each regular season (+possibly in postseason as they both are or want to be contenders). Not an ideal situation: they will compete for the same opportunity. In Miami, he'd have to play Brady twice each regular season. Again, not ideal: if there is anyone who Manning fears, it would be Brady and his bunch. But Denver offers a relatively easy conference, which was won with a mere 8-8 record repeatedly in recent years.

I think now is the time to check a few thoughts on Peyton Manning that have become conventional wisdom, but are not necessarily true.

1. CW: Manning makes any team an instant Superbowl contender.

Come on, he didn't even make Colts a reliable Superbowl contender. In his 13 full seasons with Colts, he took them to Superbowl 2 times, winning one. His all-time playoff record is 9-10. He may be the guy to lock us into AFC West lead, but his playoff track record is checkered at best. Even Tebow has better playoff winning percentage (although his sample size is really too small for comparison yet).

How would've Broncos performed in 2011 playoffs if Manning led the team instead of Tebow? Nobody knows, but I suspect the outcome would've been the same. We were crushed by Pats, totally blown out. Manning wouldn't be enough to overcome a disparity this big. And he struggled against Pats himself.

2. CW: Manning may become a good mentor to Tebow.

Manning has not shown that he can be a good mentor. None of his backups flourished and went on to have successful career. I'll skip first few years of Manning's career when he may have been considered not seasoned enough to be a mentor. In the last half of Manning's career (7 years), Colts drafted and developed 2 backups to Manning: Sorgi and Painter.

Jim Sorgi sat behind Manning for 6 years (2004-2009). He was released and moved on to Giants to back up Peyton's brother Eli. Not a career advancement. He was injured and didn't play, though.

Curtis Painter was drafted in 2009 and became starter in 2011 after injuries to Manning and Kerry Collins. He was arguably the worst starter of the league last year.

In addition, I suspect Tebow will be traded if we sign Manning. Tebow has trade value now, so trading him will help the team. And Manning and Tebow are so different, they can't quite coexist. They require completely diffrent schemes and support personnel. If we are all-in on Manning, Tebow will simply not fit in any longer.

3. CW: Tebow is important to Broncos because he fills seats and sells jerseys.

If the Manning the GOAT makes Mile High his home, no doubt people will come to watch him. And he is also a natural nice guy, who is universally loved and good for the community. No loss replacing Tebow here.

Make of it what you want. The decision is with the Broncos brass and I think Manning comes to Denver. Get ready for the ride.

This is a Fan-Created Comment on The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Mile High Report

You must be a member of Mile High Report to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mile High Report. You should read them.

Join Mile High Report

You must be a member of Mile High Report to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mile High Report. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.