2012 Denver Broncos Draft Frontboard -- One Possibility Among Many

This is one possible layout for the Denver Broncos 2012 Front Board, with medical sideboard flags highlighted in salmon and Character sideboard flags highlighted in black.

Most NFL draftniks are familiar with the term "big board" to describe a teams ranking and ordering of players in an upcoming draft. Fewer are aware of the concepts involved in breaking a big board down into manageable chunks, such as frontboards and sideboards. Read on to consider yourself among the few...

Above you can see a highlight from a sample frontboard I have assembled for the Broncos 2012 draft. On a frontboard a team will list out all of its draftable prospects, with position listed left to right, and quality, talent and role listed top to bottom, with the most talented prospects at the top. Some teams may list the positions left to right in the order they wish to prioritize them, however I have not done that here, because I plan on using a slightly more complicated system to prioritize them, based around Elway's insistence on using the term "impact" to describe what their decision-making process is all about.

In addition a team will assemble multiple sideboards, primarily a medical and character sideboard. Players on these sideboards are typically considered undraftable by a team, either due to medical concerns or off the field red flags. I have indicated possible medical and character sideboard players in my frontboard with the colors salmon (medical) and black (character). Note that Denver has likely investigated each of these situations thoroughly, and not all of them will be on their actual sideboards, though many of them will.

In addition, a final sideboard is constructed as the draft takes place, with drafted players moving off the frontboard and onto specific teams' boards. I have not included one of those here, though I do use one when watching the draft.

Below the fold, we can take a look at the Broncos frontboard as I imagine it, in its final stage before the draft.

Clicking on the image below, or (preferably) opening it in a new tab will open a higher resolution HTML version of the frontboard which you can zoom in or out of for better viewing.

2012_broncos_frontboard_medium

As you can see, even in the extremely condensed image above, a frontboard containing hundreds of players can be huge when layed out properly. If the medical and character sideboards were included here as separate boards rather than highlights, the entire thing would be massive indeed, but its organization allows quick and easy assessment of what Denver can do in any given scenario in the draft.

First some notes on the frontboard construction

Overall every player on the board is graded first for their straight football ability, including what they do best, what they do worst, and what role the team thinks they will occupy in the NFL, such as starting DC or edge rushing DE. Then the players are organized according to this general grade, flagged for medical or character concerns, and entered onto the board. Then individual players' grades are weighted by a teams' draft philosophy (need, BPA, some combination of both, etc.).

In this frontboard I have made the following changes in each players grade weighting (note that 'positive' refers to a grade higher than it otherwise would be, while 'negative' means lower):

  • Starting caliber DT/NTs have been given positive weight
  • Starting caliber DCs have been given positive weight
  • Starting caliber RBs have been given positive weight
  • Starting TEs and SS/FS have slightly negative weight
  • Starting QBs have no change
  • Developmental QBs have a slight positive wieght
  • Developmental DT/NT and DCs have no change
  • Developmental OB have a slight positive weight
  • Developmental and Starting IB have no change
  • Developmental interior OL has slight positive weight
  • All other OL have no change
  • Rush DEs have positive weight, all other DEs no change
  • WR/RS have a very slight positive weight, all other WR no change

Feel free to discuss the merits of these weighting criteria and to suggest your own in the comments. And if you feel like it, here is an .ods/.xls version of the frontboard that will allow you to make changes at will:

.xls/.ods Frontboard

Back to the board, one final item to note is the gray bar on the left hand side. The grades for the prospects generally correlates to which round they may be taken in (though they are more a measure of starting ability) but there may be more first round grades than there are first round slots. The slightly darker areas of gray indicate areas of the draft where high value players will necessarily be available at the tops of the following round.

In this particular draft, there are approximately 4-8 more 1st round graded players (immediate starters) than there are selections, so teams in the top half of the second round will get a shot at some real impact. There are also fewer 2nd round grades(possible immediate starter in the right situation) than there are 2nd round slots, so by the time the second round is over, those teams (including Denver) will be picking from the last of a thinned out group of possible day one starters. I expect to see several teams attempt to move around in the second half of the 2nd round. A similar analysis can be done at every round-break.

Using the frontboard

Now, when a team is looking at this board, they have a lot of ways they can use it. Lets create a 2nd round example.

In this example we have zoomed in on the draft board as it stands as Denver goes on the clock with the #57 pick. For the purposes of this exercise, we will assume that no draftable players remain from the first round grades, or the top of the second round. Among the players expected to be around Denver's pick, several have already come off the board, including nice prospects like LaVonte David and Bobby Wagner. Also of interest is that a team jumped on Chandler Jones, a complete DE type with good height, weight speed measurables, despite his injury flags.

Going by the board alone, the picks to consider are RB LaMicheal James, versatile OG Jeff Allen, two-gap NT Alameda and IB Mychal Kendricks. Every one of these selections could meet a need for the Broncos and all are top talents at this draft spot according to the board.

But if we dig a little deeper we find that not every selection is ideally suited at this spot. LaMicheal James has a spotty medical record, especially with hamstring issues that have plagued him. Allen will be changing positions to move inside at the pro level. Alameda projects as a 3-4 stalwart with weight issues, and borderline immediate impact ability. Kendricks looks good but projects to move inside after playing outside in a 3-4, so scheme and role fit aren't very good. Does this mean we are stuck with the lesser of evils?

Not at all. A second round grade is a general grade, and we shouldn't limit ourselves to only the top 3 or 4 guys in this scenario. If we extend our range to include Pead, Winn, Boykin and others, we actually give ourselves a much better chance to grab immediate impact with this high value pick. Personally I would rule out Pead at this pick only because he is a bit one dimensional here (but very good at what he does). I also won't look too hard at Winn, but mostly because in this example I assume Denver took a DT/NT with their 1st rounder (Poe). Safety George Iloka is there (I cut him out due to image size restrictions), but I don't think he will have much opportunity to impact the lineup due to some of his tackling deficiencies. I really love the idea of a DC here, and Boykin is highly rated. He is a feisty player that I like a lot, great speed, very competitive, explosive in his playmaking ability. What I don't like is projecting him at the nickle spot, or substituting on the outside in an emergency. He has difficulty with big WRs, and isn't nearly physical enough for my taste. I LOVE that he is a top return man, though. One thing that makes me wary is that he hasn't been able to pass a physical due to an injury last winter. Denver may have more confidence in his right fibula at this point, but I am wondering if I have another option.

Very close in grade to Boykin is Josh Robinson out of Central Florida. He is a great nickle candidate, with fast feet, great direction change and very fluid hips and ability to turn to either side to stick with a play. He first came on my radar vs. AJ Green in the 2010 Liberty Bowl, where he was impressive. He was the top rated DC athletically, and his jumping ability more than makes up for his borderline height. He doesn't routinely struggle with bigger WRs or TEs. Of all the above players under consideration, I am most confident in Josh's ability to come in and make a difference right away as a starting dime or nickle back. On a side note, I don't like how the DC talent curve falls after this round, so I am all to happy to make a move on a corner now.

This is a tough call on a lot of levels, and as you can see, EFX have their work cut out for them. Do you take the best chance for impact? The best overall grade? The weakest roster spot? The most exciting player?

What would you do in this scenario?

7-Round Denver Broncos Mock Draft

I'll spare you my thoughts on how the board fell, and leave you with a short and sweet 7-round Denver mock based on this frontboard. Happy Draftivus!

  • Round 1 Pick #25 overall: NT Dontari Poe, Memphis: Easily a first round talent, I'm not scared off by the "underacheiver" label, and neither should the Broncos. Teams across the league are moving him up their board as they talk to the coaching staff at Memphis and realize that he played great within the role that he was given. When he was asked to do more he did more. When he was asked take one for the team, he did that too. Might be the strongest player in the draft.
  • Round 2 Pick #57 overall: DC Josh Robinson, Central Florida: I just upgraded my starting spread defensive package, and I expect that Josh will be a 16 game activation this season. He's durable, smart and very fast, and will be the most explosive player in the defensive backfield.
  • Round 3 Pick #87 overall: RB Bernard Pierce, Temple: My favorite prospects at RB outside of the top 4 or 5 all have medical flags or fumbling problems, but Pierce is worth the oversight. To me he is a bit of a McGahee story, who can be effective from multiple RB roles, and who is defined by his patient running. Like McGahee he can get a bit high when he runs, but he is also very powerfully built, and should fare well running between the tackles. The star of a Power "O" offense, he has the right mentality for a John Fox back. Not a third down back at this point, but was a willing blocker and good learner.
  • Round 4 Pick #108 Overall: QB Nick Foles, Arizona: The best all around prospect outside of the second round, he does everything well, when it is going according to plan. Will be a great student of a Manning led offense, and should make Hanie expendable by the end of the season. A smart, Kubiak style pickup who should create a stable 'terra firma' as Manning's career winds its way to a close.
  • Round 4 Pick #120 Overall: WR/RS T.J. Graham, No.Carolina: The timing is right to grab perhaps the most consistent, productive kick returner in the draft. Unique combination of possession style and speed WR abilities. He is good in motion, stabbing straight upfield, on the quick pass. I like him to compete for the #5 WR role, and I am confident he is the opening day starter as a kick return specialist. His speed and great hands need some catchup help from his overall WR route and offense understanding, but what better QB than Manning to be working with for that.
  • Round 5 Pick #137 Overall: IB Tank Carder, TCU: Productive, smart player who projects well to help in all phases of special teams. I really wanted to get another young LB with legitimate talent to push Mohamed and Irving from below. Carder has great coverage ability and can man and blitz both the IB and WOB positions. If I had my druthers I would have liked to package the 6th rounder, or similar value and moved up a handful of spots, because a huge patch of late 4th round talent was still available.
  • Round 6 Pick #188 Overall: OC Michael Brewster, Ohio State: If we were just grading the first few seconds after the snap, Brewster would be a much higher ranked player. Great initial push and handwork, very consistent snapping from shotgun and conventional, good understanding of his role. Great developmental interior prospect with the athleticism to step in where needed. Very intense and focused personality.
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Mile High Report

You must be a member of Mile High Report to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mile High Report. You should read them.

Join Mile High Report

You must be a member of Mile High Report to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Mile High Report. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker