As The Roster Turns -- Broncos Make Several Moves
The Denver Broncos on Tuesday made several roster transactions, Head Coach Mike Shanahan announced.
The club signed free-agent punter Paul Ernster and added safety Roderick Rogers to its active roster from its practice squad. Denver also waived punter Todd Sauerbrun and safety Marviel Underwood while placing safety Nick Ferguson on its reserve/injured list with a right knee injury.
Ernster (6-foot-0, 217 pounds) is a third-year punter who joins the Broncos for his second stint with the club after he was waived by Denver on Aug. 28. He signed with Cleveland on Sept. 8 and punted in the Browns' season opener against Pittsburgh a day later before they waived him on Sept. 18.
Selected by Denver in the seventh round (239th overall) of the 2005 NFL Draft from Northern Arizona University, Ernster has punted 87 times for 3,594 yards (41.3 gross avg. / 36.5 net avg.) in 18 career games. He has placed 25 punts inside the 20-yard line and has kicked off 78 times for 5,253 yards (67.3 avg.) with 19 touchbacks (24.4%) during his career.
In 2006 with the Broncos, Ernster punted 80 times for 3,338 yards (41.7 gross avg. / 36.6 net avg.) with 23 punts placed inside the 20-yard line. His 19 touchbacks on kickoffs ranked third in the NFL.
Ernster was born Jan. 26, 1982, and attended Ironwood High School in Glendale, Ariz.
Rogers (6-foot-2, 187 pounds) is a rookie safety who spent the first 15 weeks of this season on Denver's practice squad after entering the league with the Broncos as a college free agent on May 2. He earned second-team All-Big Ten Conference accolades in each of his final two seasons at the University of Wisconsin and totaled 99 tackles (66 solo) along with five interceptions (138 yds.) for his collegiate career.
Rogers was born Sept. 7, 1984, and attended Stephenson High School in Stone Mountain, Ga
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
Rogers
40yd dash - 4.47 / 4.50 ... Short shuttle - 4.25 ... 3 cone - 7.05 ... Vertical - 35.5 inches ... Broad jump - 9'9" Bench press - 14
He was projected with first round speed, and was ranked in the top 6 free safeties in many publications, including the Sporting News. But doubts about a knee injury in the Capital One Bowl, as well as the fact that he only played safety for two years and had been played at many different positions from highschool on led to him being picked up by Denver as a CFA. Many scouts thought he was going to be taken and turned into a CB for some team.
The guy has been compared to a center fielder, he has great lateral range and closes quickly. Covers a lot of area, has a burst of speed, stays with routes downfield. Knocks against him are a nose for the ball, but poor hands, and a tremendous need for coaching. He said as much in a proday interview last year when asked what kind of team he hoped would draft him. He replied that he wanted a team with a "good coaching staff," that would be willing to help him "master one position."
I really think he has the tools needed for the SAF position for the Broncos, and even though he wasn't considered a great ball handler, he was considered to be the kind of guy who found his way to the ball, and closed quickly. He is rumoured to be a studious film guy, which is great at the NFL level, and also shows that he really did want to be coached. I don't doubt that the Broncos have been investing a good amount of time into his development.
My only question is, Are we going to get to see him this year? I sure hope so, but it is possible he was only promoted to insure the previous investment, so he didn't get nabbed by some team. The Practice Squad is still a pretty recent development, so a lot of teams are still getting their programs and policies in place for PS evaluations. Denver seems to already be ahead of the curve on this one, so props should go to Sundquist.
by Jeremy Bolander on Dec 18, 2007 6:41 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Great stuff Styg
It sounds like he may be good. All I want in a SAF is speed, smarts and the ability to tackle. Good hands would be icing on the cake, but you can rarely have it all.
His answer about wanting to play for a team with good coaching (and his devotion to game film) make me feel pretty good. My only concern is how good he is if he is only know coming up from the practice squad.
If he pans out this would be a major break for Denver. At worst he may be a decent back up, STs player.
by Steve Nichols on Dec 18, 2007 9:52 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Regarding smarts
But how indeed does it mesh with him not getting off the practice squad until now? I can only cite depth in front of him (since ferguson was only now placed on IR), as well as the thought that it probably takes some time for a SAF to come in and adjust to Bate's scheme.
What exactly is the SAF responsible for reading? How quickly is his decision made and at what level of the defense? Is he looking at the down linemen or is he looking primarily at guys like TE, WR, RB?
by Jeremy Bolander on Dec 18, 2007 11:03 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Good questions
The two keys to smarts for a SAF is reading offenses (no easy task) and doing it at game speed. I have a lot of respect for safeties. I was defensive coordiantor at the high scool level, and I doubt I could break down an offense in less than ten to fifteen seconds. What I did on paper and chalk boards these guys do in seconds, and they're out of breath, AND they do it on a pro level (light years more complicated than anything I ever dealt with).
I don't know how pro level deep zone coverage safeties are taught to observe the offense. My direction to safeties was primarily to keep "the entire play in front of you". This means no WR or TE gets behind you. But you can't "coach smarts". A good pair of SAFs know that one guy (the other SAF) might assist a CB covering a WR streaking deep, while the other one (himself) reads a WR breaking off across the field in a slant. They get to know each other and where each guy will go without coaching. There are too many offensive variations to have a set and easy rule for where to have SAFs go in their zones, so you trust them to be smart and to work together not to get in each others way. They learn mostly from watching film and seeing where they can improve, or watching film of other safeties and pointing out good and bad decisions. We had a few plays drawn up (man, double coverage, other areas to zone) for odd situations (never a blitz in my system), but most of what they did was learned and not taught if you understand what I mean.
As far as where their eyes are, at the start of the play they watch any receiver eligible players (including the RB and FB). It is to be hoped that the SAF gets an idea from what he sees what the play may be. We drilled our SAFs on game film to read rush versus pass by how offensive players lined up (how a receiver might stance for each play without realizing it for instance). The SAFs then take a brief look at the o-lines feet for more clues. After this they watch the QB and the ball, watching all the eligible receivers with their periphreal vision. Once the play is beyond rush the SAFs pick seperate targets presenting the biggest shot at a blown or deep play and take him.
Again, the SAFs read each other for who to take. Short passes are the most difficult, since the SAFs have a harder time picking a target (we called the target for safeties a "principal"). Rarely the SAFs keep their zone until the last minute, but a good SAF will read the play as it erupts and start taking their angle to prevent the big play. An excellent SAF is in position before the balls arrives to make the hit. I didn't want my SAFs going for the INT because a blown attempt can allow the WR to get downfield, but I told the kids they'd never get balled out if they got it. If they missed it they caught hell no matter how well the play turned out (from the d-backs coach). Intelligence was the first thing I looked for, then speed. If a kid couldn't tackle they never got a look for DEF. So our emphasis was that the safety is like a goalie. His job isn't to make spectacular turnovers, it is to stop TDs.
Bear in mind on this one, the pros are different from high school. That's the best I can do. The safeties in my experience might be a little more complicated than my description if I went into further detail, but I obviously can only begin to try to describe the pro versions.
Hope that gets you started at least, even if it doesn't answer the question as well as a pro coach.
by Steve Nichols on Dec 19, 2007 1:49 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder where Underwood will go?
I am hoping to see many more acquisitions for the Defense soon and am very curious about who we will be picking up. The youth movement will have a lot of players with ceilings that are yet to be determined. The amount of unknown variables will be a very interesting process for the fans and very challenging for the coaching staff for the next couple of years.
Styg, thanks for the research and info on Rogers.
by Arctic Bronco on Dec 18, 2007 7:15 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
My slavish devotion
I see Roderick Rogers in much this same light. I didn't even know they had him until about halfway through the season. I am hoping, unrealistically, that he is the kind of answer that we have been worrying about for about 14 weeks now, and go figure, the Broncos had him all along...
Realistically, I think the most we can find out is whether or not this 'project' is on track. I like this kid, and I think he could remove a lot of the stigmatism associated with a 'project' player in the eyes of Broncos fans.
by Jeremy Bolander on Dec 18, 2007 8:49 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Regarding Underwood
If I had to guess, I would say he is done playing football.
by Jeremy Bolander on Dec 18, 2007 8:51 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting,
But what I really wanted to say is I'm glad we don't have to deal with any more "character issues" at that position anymore. I wondered what the Broncos might be getting into when they commited to "that other guy." I'd like to see Mr. Ernster do well. I'm a strong believer in the idea that adversity makes you tougher and I hope he's a little more consistant and tougher mentally for the rough stretch he's had to endure.
One thing is for certain though, he's not going to be outkicking his coverage. Nevertheless, if the punting team can make consistant stops for little or no return yardage after moderate kicks we may be better off in the long run.
by Trinidad Jack on Dec 19, 2007 9:58 AM MST reply actions 0 recs

by 

































