In fact, I think the draft is deep enough in the positions we have a need for that we are bound to get several picks that should work out well.

I'm not putting too much stock in rising and falling names.  Often times the "experts" aren't familiar with the specific needs of a team (like player type).  In fact, click Guru's link for second round drafts.  Most of the expert sites don't even understand the rotational draft rule for tied teams, and don't understand that we have the 42nd pick.  That why I'm sticking with MHR for most of my draft news.

Another thing to take into account is that rising and falling stock based on intangibles often have little to do with our interests in certain players.  For example, Clady may not look so hot to some teams because they don't need an OT or they are looking at someone else.  But since he has fast feet the zone blocks teams would salivate for him.

Let's say Phillips stock is falling.  It could be because teams want something else.  BUT, the few teams that want him may want him badly.  I only care about how the Broncos rate a player, not the sports media in general.  Following the draft discussion on a team specific site (like MHR) is the best way to determine a player's stock for your own team in my opinion.