Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dog Football! Which Breeds Are Best Suited For The Gridiron?

The NFL Salary Cap (a not so brief intro)

This is an introduction to the salary cap.  There will probably be more diaries to follow that drill down into specific minutia of the rules or that look at a player's contract in more specific detail.  I'll start by saying that the salary cap is similar to income taxes.  There are a couple pretty basic rules, but then there are pages and pages of exceptions.  

On the surface the salary cap is pretty simple: There is a maximum total salary for each team every season.  This number is determined based on league revenue (mostly from television) and goes up annually.  It will be roughly $116 million in 2008.  However, not all money earned is created equally and that is where the fun begins.  A player's compensation can be broken up into two main categories (which can then be subdivided): base salary and bonuses/incentives.

Base salary> - it is what it says it is, the salary that is the basis for each player's game check.  A player's base salary counts in its entirety for the year it is earned.  The only thing tricky here is that players who are added to the roster in mid season have their salaries prorated based on how much of the season they are on the roster.  (I believe that a veteran player who is on the team for week1 has their entire salary guaranteed for the year and it counts fully against the cap even if they are cut)  

There is also a veteran minimum exception to the base salary accounting.  Any veteran with 4 or more accrued seasons who is signed to a one year deal for the minimum salary (and has bonuses of less than $40,000) will have a cap value equal to a player with 2 years accrued experience.  In layman's terms, that means that a 8 year player signed for the vet minimum of $720K would only count $435K against the cap.  This gives fringe veterans a chance to compete with their cheaper, younger competition; perhaps John Engelberger or Ebenezer Ekuban this year (I am not sure if these contracts are allowed to be incentive laden or if that violates the spirit.)

Bonuses/Incentives - This is a broad category that covers any kind of lump sum compensation given to a player.  It includes performance based incentives (ie. scoring X TD's in a year), roster bonuses and incentives (ie. being on the roster on June 15 or being on the active roster for X games), reporting bonuses, workout bonuses, etc.  However there is one key distinction that divides bonuses into two groups.

Most casual fans are familiar with signing bonuses that are given to players at the beginning of the contract.  For salary cap purposes, these bonuses are prorated over the entire length of the contract.  If a player is given a $2 million signing bonus for a 4 year contract it would count $500,000 against the salary cap for each of the 4 years of the contract.  In addition to traditional signing bonuses, any bonus that is guaranteed is considered a signing bonus for salary cap purposes.  (This is the often the hardest part of determining cap values, figuring out if a roster bonus was guaranteed or not)

With salary cap proration comes the concept of acceleration, which occurs when a player leaves the team (via trade, release, retirement, etc).  At that point, the un-prorated portions of all bonuses accelerate to the current year.  In the above example, if the player is released in the reloading season before the second year of the contract, the last $750,000 of the signing bonus would accelerate to year two.  Of course there is an exception to this rule.  If the transaction is after June 1, the acceleration is split over two years with the current year maintaining its normal proration and the rest being counted against the next year.  In our example if the player is cut after June 1, he counts $250,000 against the cap in year two and $500,000 against the cap in year three.  And to add to the confusion, teams now have the ability to designate transactions as post-June 1 even if they actually occur before June 1.

Bonuses that are not guaranteed cannot be prorated and are counted all at once against the cap.  However, this is not always in the year that they are earned.  That is because there are two different classes: Likely to be Earned (LTBE) and Not Likely to be Earned (NLTBE).  Anything that is considered LTBE counts against the salary cap in the current year, whether the bonus is achieved or not.  Anything that is considered NLTBE counts against the salary cap the following year and only if it is achieved.  If any LTBE bonuses are not achieved, the team receives a cap credit for the next year.  Reporting and workout bonuses are LTBE, as are roster bonuses (for the most part).  As a rule of thumb for veterans, something is considered LTBE if the player achieved the milestone the previous year whereas there is a chart that is used for rookies based on when (or if) they were drafted.

There are additional intricacies that I have either glossed over or am unaware of, but this is the quick (ha) summary.  If there is anything that is unclear or if you see a mistake or know the answer to something I am unsure of, please let me know.  If there is more information you would like about a specific rule or about a specific player's situation, leave a comment and I will do my best to answer here or in a future diary.

Star-divide


I'll close with a practical example from the Broncos roster who happens to be a frequent target of criticism on this board, Mr. Ian Gold.  In 2005, Gold signed a 5 year contract with a $5.75 million signing bonus.  In 2006, Denver paid a $2 million option bonus to extend the contract by one year (essentially a secondary signing bonus).  Below is his salary structure by year. (sorry for the terrible formatting)

[editor's note, by MattR]: I forgot about 500,000 roster bonuses from 2008-2010

2005:     540,000 base salary
           1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years (2005-2009)
    ------------------------------------------------
           1,690,000 TOTAL CAP COST   ($6.29 million actually earned)

2006:     670,000 base salary
           1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years
             400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years (2006-2010)
           2,500,000 roster bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
             100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
    ------------------------------------------------
           4,820,000 TOTAL CAP COST   ($5.27 million actually earned)

2007:   2,300,000 base salary
           1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years
             400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years
             100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
    ------------------------------------------------
           3,950,000 TOTAL CAP COST   ($2.4 million actually earned)

2008:   2,750,000 base salary
           1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years
             400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years
             100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
             500,000 roster bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
    ------------------------------------------------
           4,900,000 TOTAL CAP COST   ($3.35 million scheduled to be earned)

2009:   3,400,000 base salary
            1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years
             400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years
             100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
             500,000 roster bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
    ------------------------------------------------
           5,550,000 TOTAL CAP COST  ($4.0 million scheduled to be earned)

2010:   4,590,000 base salary
             400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years
             100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
             500,000 roster bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
    ------------------------------------------------
           5,590,000 TOTAL CAP COST   ($5.19 million scheduled to be earned)

(Note:  I this case, I am assuming that the workout bonuses from 2006 and 2007 continue for the rest of the contract.  These types of things are generally impossible to track down).

Some useful links:

A salary cap FAQ

USA Today Database of salaries/salary cap values for completed year's

NFL Player's Association player search to get current and future base salary info

RotoWorld roster of the Denver Broncos  Each player's page has contract info

Ian Whetstone's salary cap page - a compilation of data put together by a fan  His stuff is pretty good, although a bit out of date.  He was definitely a source I relied on when calculating the Broncos' cap numbers.

The actual Collective Bargaining Agreement  If you want to get adventurous and download Article 24 to get all the salary cap rules.

This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well done!
Man, Ian costs way too much money!  Time to cut him or restructure the contract again.
We are all undefeated now!

by mdierk on Feb 22, 2008 11:29 AM MST reply actions  

Dude! Ian Gold makes that much!?
He makes like 50,000 bucks for each missed tackle last year!  

Can you show us what the Cap effect will be if we cut him?  From 2008-2010?

2007=1995 all over again: http://www.milehighreport.com/story/2007/10/1/202724/157

by Tim Lynch on Feb 22, 2008 11:54 AM MST reply actions  

More on Gold
I actually forgot about a $500,000 roster bonuses he has due in 2008 - 2010 so his salary and cap figures jump a bit (I will update the diary in a second).

He has the two signing bonuses:
5.75 million over 5 years from 2005-2009 and 2 million over 5 years from 2006-2010.

The allocated portions already "paid" by Denver for 2005-2007 were 4.25 million total leaving 3.5 million left.  That would be the cap hit if he is cut now.  In 2008, Denver "pays " another 1.55 million of that leaving 1.95 million remaining after teh season (which would be the cap hit if they cut him then)

Option 1:  Keep Ian for 2008 and beyond
  2008 - 4.9 cap value (earns 3.35 million)
  2009 - 5.55 cap value (earns 4 million)
  2010 - 5.59 cap value (earns 5.19 million)

Option 2: Cut him now
  2008 - 3.5 million cap value (save 1.4 million against the cap)
  2009 - 0     (save 5.55 million against the cap)
  2010 - 0     (save 5.59 million against the cap)

Option 3:  Cut him after June 1 (and pay his 500K bonus)
  2008 - 3.05 cap value (500,000 earned)  (save 1.85 million against the cap)
  2009 - 1.95 cap value (zero earned)  (save 3.6 million against the cap)
  2010 - 0     (save 5.59 million against the cap)

Option 4:  Cut him Feb 2009
  2008 - 4.9 cap value (earns 3.35 million)
  2009 - 1.95 cap value (zero earned)  (save 3.6 million against the cap)
  2010 - 0     (save 5.59 million against the cap)

Option 5: Cut him June 1 2009 (and pay his 500K bonus)  (This option makes no sense)
  2008 - 4.9 cap value (earns 3.35 million)
  2009 - 2.05 cap value (500,000 earned) (save 3.5 million against the cap)
  2010 - 400,000 cap value  (save 5.19 million against the cap)

Is this a good format to display the numbers or do  I need to learn the HTML to make a nicer tabe with columns?

by MattR on Feb 22, 2008 12:16 PM MST up reply actions  

Cut him now
I know the Broncos would save more to wait until 6/1 but I still have a spot in the ticker for Gold. He's given us some good years and this would give him a better chance to hook up somewhere else.

BTW, your format is fine.

Or so I'm told.

by MN Bronco on Feb 22, 2008 12:19 PM MST up reply actions  

We would save more by cutting
him in June only THIS YEAR, but he would screw us over next year.  So I say, CUT HIM YESTERDAY!
2007=1995 all over again: http://www.milehighreport.com/story/2007/10/1/202724/157

by Tim Lynch on Feb 22, 2008 1:46 PM MST up reply actions  

Question
Can't we designate him as a post June 1 cut Today? I thought that was the new rule from last year.

That way we don't have to even pay him that 500k bonus.

Orange County is hot. Really! Haven't you seen the weather report?

by amirebram on Feb 23, 2008 9:19 AM MST up reply actions  

That is a very good question
And unfortunately I don't know the answer.  I haven't found anything that discusses how naming someone a June 1 cut in advance works with bonuses due before June 1.

In terms of the Broncos, the biggest benefit to that would be with Javon Walker.  It would give them nice flexibility if Denver could cut him now and spread the cap hit over two years without having to pay him any of the $5.4 million in bonuses they owe him this year.

I will do some digging and see if I can find anything to answer this.  Or maybe some other reader knows the answer and can save me the trouble.

by MattR on Feb 23, 2008 1:56 PM MST up reply actions  

After further review
I think they can cut him before the bonus is due and still designate him as a post June 1 cut.  I think he would still count against the cap until June 2, but only for the parts of the contract that were already paid (and not the unpaid bonus).  Below is the text from a draft copy of the CBA from the NFLPA website
Each Club may designate up to two Player Contracts that, if terminated on or prior to June 1 and if not renegotiated after the last regular season game of the prior League Year, shall be treated (except to the extent prescribed by Section 7(d)(iii) below) as if terminated on June 2, i.e., the Salary Cap charge for each such contract will remain in the Club's Team Salary until June 2, at which time its Paragraph 5 Salary and any unearned LTBE incentives will no longer be counted and any unamortized signing bonus will be treated as set forth in Subsection (2) below.

The section 7diii refers to guaranteed salary that has not been paid, but I think that Walker and Gold are due roster and/or option bonuses which were not guaranteed (otherwise they would be paying the money anyway)

by MattR on Feb 27, 2008 1:20 AM MST up reply actions  

Nice
I need to find a copy of these rules to read.
Orange County is hot. Really! Haven't you seen the weather report?

by amirebram on Feb 28, 2008 3:44 PM MST up reply actions  

The last link in this diary
Is to the CBA.  Article 24 is the Salary cap.  You can download the PDF.

by MattR on Feb 29, 2008 10:38 AM MST up reply actions  

Where do I sign?
I'd be more than happy to miss tackles for only $30K per. Anyone know how I can get in touch with Sundquist?
Or so I'm told.

by MN Bronco on Feb 22, 2008 12:17 PM MST up reply actions  

I told ya this post would
hit the headlines in no time!  Nice job Matt!
2007=1995 all over again: http://www.milehighreport.com/story/2007/10/1/202724/157

by Tim Lynch on Feb 22, 2008 3:16 PM MST reply actions  

Awesome work Matt!
In a matter of days MHR fans are up on the combine (from Styg50), and now the cerebraly elusive salary cap!

You have not only put out an excellent article, but done a great service for everyone who wants to learn about the cap.

You da man!

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Feb 22, 2008 6:27 PM MST reply actions  

Add Sports Illustrated to your link fame.
You've hit the big time Matt!  ESPN and SI in one article.  SI is the best I've ever done.

Congrats!

(Guru's "Walker is probably gone" article also made SI).

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Feb 22, 2008 7:56 PM MST reply actions  

People should get a cut
It's quality work, why shouldnt it be rewarded?

I really mean it... SI and ESPN make money from content. TSG should come up with some sort of common  rights copy right. It would help get some neat stuff done for MHR

Orange County is hot. Really! Haven't you seen the weather report?

by amirebram on Feb 22, 2008 10:20 PM MST reply actions  

nah.
They get a little bit of content from us, and we get the traffic.  It's a good deal.

With a copyright issue we would just lose the traffic that we could have gotten, and they'll get the content elsewhere.

Besides, I like the bragging rights when a mainstream site links me or someone I know.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Feb 23, 2008 1:05 AM MST up reply actions  

Congrats to MattR on the ESPN & SI
contributions!  You did a good job of making a complex process easier to understand.  

Since my biggest interest in football is watching the long range strategic decisions that franchises make to stay competitive, I need to learn more about how the cap works.  That helps me to understand why some talented players get cut or just traded for a song.

by Arctic Bronco on Feb 23, 2008 6:58 AM MST reply actions  

La, la, la
"Where did you come from,
Where did you go?
Where did you come from,
Javon Walker..."

by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 23, 2008 11:42 AM MST up reply actions  

Sometimes I wonder about
whether exposure to ESPN and SI, as well as most other MSM outlets is worth much.

For most of their readers, the sight of objective analysis and thought out responses would be like sunlight to a vampire...

GURU van Helsing!  Slayer of MSM zombies!!

by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 23, 2008 11:46 AM MST reply actions  

Thanks!
It looks crazy complicated, but I think I followed most of it! I do think baseball needs something like this...

One other question: how do they decide the cap?

http://www.notthisday.com

by Squeaky on Feb 23, 2008 6:40 PM MST reply actions  

The cap is based on a % of league revenue
I believe it is currently somewhere between 55-60% of total league revenue (ticket sales, merchandise, advertising, television rights, etc).  Of course even with this there are exceptions, the biggest of which is that the salary cap cannot decrease from the previous year's value even if league revenues drop.

If you have the time, I would suggest reading the salary cap FAQ that I link to at the bottom of this story.  It is quite long (makes this look like a postcard), but it does a very good job of breaking things down and also explaining the evolution/rationale behind some of the complexities in the rules.

by MattR on Feb 23, 2008 10:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Read the Salary Cap FAQ
And I think I get that part, but some questions: What is the Franchise tag? How does that work? Does a player have to become a free agent after the year is up? How do teams choose the "franchise" player (any special guidelines)?
http://www.notthisday.com

by Squeaky on Feb 24, 2008 12:50 PM MST up reply actions  

Franchise tag can get complicated
I will probably do another diary that explains the options that teams have with their free agents (both restricted and unrestricted).  This will cover things like qualifying tenders and the right of first refusal with restricted free agents and the franchise and transition tags for unrestricted free agents.

The short version is that all these various mechanisms restrict the actual freedom of certain free agents.  Each team can designate one of their free agents as a "franchise player".  They have to offer that player a one year contract worth the average of the top 5 salaries at that position.  Depending on the exact type of franchise tag applied, the team would either gain exclusive rights to negotiate with the player or the team would receive two first round draft picks from any other team that signs the player.

There is no requirement that a team use the franchise tag and they have complete discretion over who they use it on.  Generally speaking, teams will use the cap as a temporary measure to discourage other teams while they try and work out a longer contract.  But there are times, like Asante Samuel of the Patriots, where the player signs the one year contract and then becomes a free agent at the end of the year.  

There are tons of exceptions and details that I will try to cover in more detail in a diary, but I hope this was a good start to answering the questions.

by MattR on Feb 24, 2008 5:27 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Haleycriesalot_small
Pre-Free Agency Thoughts
Pumpkin_small
MLBs - what we have and what Fox and Del Rio historically want
Ph_small
2011: MHR I Need Your Help With An Upcoming Post
Zozobra_small
Explaining What "IT" Is that Tebow Has: An Analysis of the Art of Miracles
Pumpkin_small
The risk/reward analysis on drafting RBs earlier vs later

Recent FanPosts

Cube-orange_small
what makes a good nickel cornerback?
Small
Spread-ing History
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
The First Real Signing
La_la_land_small
Kids In A Candy Store
Small
A Shot at a Mock
Small
Broncos positions of need – off season 2012
0_1979_ford_f100-sequin_small
My GM box 2.0
Pimp_hand_-_the_pimp_hand_is_strong_in_this_one_small
Questions about the Spread Offense
Small
CHEAP SKATES

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

Dadndaughter_small Tim Lynch

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Position Coach

Flag_canada_small Colby

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall

Small zsheely

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk