The NFL Salary Cap (a not so brief intro)
This is an introduction to the salary cap. There will probably be more diaries to follow that drill down into specific minutia of the rules or that look at a player's contract in more specific detail. I'll start by saying that the salary cap is similar to income taxes. There are a couple pretty basic rules, but then there are pages and pages of exceptions.
On the surface the salary cap is pretty simple: There is a maximum total salary for each team every season. This number is determined based on league revenue (mostly from television) and goes up annually. It will be roughly $116 million in 2008. However, not all money earned is created equally and that is where the fun begins. A player's compensation can be broken up into two main categories (which can then be subdivided): base salary and bonuses/incentives.
Base salary> - it is what it says it is, the salary that is the basis for each player's game check. A player's base salary counts in its entirety for the year it is earned. The only thing tricky here is that players who are added to the roster in mid season have their salaries prorated based on how much of the season they are on the roster. (I believe that a veteran player who is on the team for week1 has their entire salary guaranteed for the year and it counts fully against the cap even if they are cut)
There is also a veteran minimum exception to the base salary accounting. Any veteran with 4 or more accrued seasons who is signed to a one year deal for the minimum salary (and has bonuses of less than $40,000) will have a cap value equal to a player with 2 years accrued experience. In layman's terms, that means that a 8 year player signed for the vet minimum of $720K would only count $435K against the cap. This gives fringe veterans a chance to compete with their cheaper, younger competition; perhaps John Engelberger or Ebenezer Ekuban this year (I am not sure if these contracts are allowed to be incentive laden or if that violates the spirit.)
Bonuses/Incentives - This is a broad category that covers any kind of lump sum compensation given to a player. It includes performance based incentives (ie. scoring X TD's in a year), roster bonuses and incentives (ie. being on the roster on June 15 or being on the active roster for X games), reporting bonuses, workout bonuses, etc. However there is one key distinction that divides bonuses into two groups.
Most casual fans are familiar with signing bonuses that are given to players at the beginning of the contract. For salary cap purposes, these bonuses are prorated over the entire length of the contract. If a player is given a $2 million signing bonus for a 4 year contract it would count $500,000 against the salary cap for each of the 4 years of the contract. In addition to traditional signing bonuses, any bonus that is guaranteed is considered a signing bonus for salary cap purposes. (This is the often the hardest part of determining cap values, figuring out if a roster bonus was guaranteed or not)
With salary cap proration comes the concept of acceleration, which occurs when a player leaves the team (via trade, release, retirement, etc). At that point, the un-prorated portions of all bonuses accelerate to the current year. In the above example, if the player is released in the reloading season before the second year of the contract, the last $750,000 of the signing bonus would accelerate to year two. Of course there is an exception to this rule. If the transaction is after June 1, the acceleration is split over two years with the current year maintaining its normal proration and the rest being counted against the next year. In our example if the player is cut after June 1, he counts $250,000 against the cap in year two and $500,000 against the cap in year three. And to add to the confusion, teams now have the ability to designate transactions as post-June 1 even if they actually occur before June 1.
Bonuses that are not guaranteed cannot be prorated and are counted all at once against the cap. However, this is not always in the year that they are earned. That is because there are two different classes: Likely to be Earned (LTBE) and Not Likely to be Earned (NLTBE). Anything that is considered LTBE counts against the salary cap in the current year, whether the bonus is achieved or not. Anything that is considered NLTBE counts against the salary cap the following year and only if it is achieved. If any LTBE bonuses are not achieved, the team receives a cap credit for the next year. Reporting and workout bonuses are LTBE, as are roster bonuses (for the most part). As a rule of thumb for veterans, something is considered LTBE if the player achieved the milestone the previous year whereas there is a chart that is used for rookies based on when (or if) they were drafted.
There are additional intricacies that I have either glossed over or am unaware of, but this is the quick (ha) summary. If there is anything that is unclear or if you see a mistake or know the answer to something I am unsure of, please let me know. If there is more information you would like about a specific rule or about a specific player's situation, leave a comment and I will do my best to answer here or in a future diary.
I'll close with a practical example from the Broncos roster who happens to be a frequent target of criticism on this board, Mr. Ian Gold. In 2005, Gold signed a 5 year contract with a $5.75 million signing bonus. In 2006, Denver paid a $2 million option bonus to extend the contract by one year (essentially a secondary signing bonus). Below is his salary structure by year. (sorry for the terrible formatting)
[editor's note, by MattR]: I forgot about 500,000 roster bonuses from 2008-2010
2005: 540,000 base salary
1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years (2005-2009)
------------------------------------------------
1,690,000 TOTAL CAP COST ($6.29 million actually earned)
2006: 670,000 base salary
1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years
400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years (2006-2010)
2,500,000 roster bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
------------------------------------------------
4,820,000 TOTAL CAP COST ($5.27 million actually earned)
2007: 2,300,000 base salary
1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years
400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years
100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
------------------------------------------------
3,950,000 TOTAL CAP COST ($2.4 million actually earned)
2008: 2,750,000 base salary
1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years
400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years
100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
500,000 roster bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
------------------------------------------------
4,900,000 TOTAL CAP COST ($3.35 million scheduled to be earned)
2009: 3,400,000 base salary
1,150,000 proration of 5.75 million over 5 years
400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years
100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
500,000 roster bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
------------------------------------------------
5,550,000 TOTAL CAP COST ($4.0 million scheduled to be earned)
2010: 4,590,000 base salary
400,000 proration of 2.00 million over 5 years
100,000 workout bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
500,000 roster bonus (non-guaranteed, LTBE)
------------------------------------------------
5,590,000 TOTAL CAP COST ($5.19 million scheduled to be earned)
(Note: I this case, I am assuming that the workout bonuses from 2006 and 2007 continue for the rest of the contract. These types of things are generally impossible to track down).
Some useful links:
USA Today Database of salaries/salary cap values for completed year's
NFL Player's Association player search to get current and future base salary info
RotoWorld roster of the Denver Broncos Each player's page has contract info
Ian Whetstone's salary cap page - a compilation of data put together by a fan His stuff is pretty good, although a bit out of date. He was definitely a source I relied on when calculating the Broncos' cap numbers.
The actual Collective Bargaining Agreement If you want to get adventurous and download Article 24 to get all the salary cap rules.
This is a Fan-Created Comment on MileHighReport.com. The opinion here is not necessarily shared by the editorial staff of MHR
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well done!
Dude! Ian Gold makes that much!?
Can you show us what the Cap effect will be if we cut him? From 2008-2010?
More on Gold
He has the two signing bonuses:
5.75 million over 5 years from 2005-2009 and 2 million over 5 years from 2006-2010.
The allocated portions already "paid" by Denver for 2005-2007 were 4.25 million total leaving 3.5 million left. That would be the cap hit if he is cut now. In 2008, Denver "pays " another 1.55 million of that leaving 1.95 million remaining after teh season (which would be the cap hit if they cut him then)
Option 1: Keep Ian for 2008 and beyond
2008 - 4.9 cap value (earns 3.35 million)
2009 - 5.55 cap value (earns 4 million)
2010 - 5.59 cap value (earns 5.19 million)
Option 2: Cut him now
2008 - 3.5 million cap value (save 1.4 million against the cap)
2009 - 0 (save 5.55 million against the cap)
2010 - 0 (save 5.59 million against the cap)
Option 3: Cut him after June 1 (and pay his 500K bonus)
2008 - 3.05 cap value (500,000 earned) (save 1.85 million against the cap)
2009 - 1.95 cap value (zero earned) (save 3.6 million against the cap)
2010 - 0 (save 5.59 million against the cap)
Option 4: Cut him Feb 2009
2008 - 4.9 cap value (earns 3.35 million)
2009 - 1.95 cap value (zero earned) (save 3.6 million against the cap)
2010 - 0 (save 5.59 million against the cap)
Option 5: Cut him June 1 2009 (and pay his 500K bonus) (This option makes no sense)
2008 - 4.9 cap value (earns 3.35 million)
2009 - 2.05 cap value (500,000 earned) (save 3.5 million against the cap)
2010 - 400,000 cap value (save 5.19 million against the cap)
Is this a good format to display the numbers or do I need to learn the HTML to make a nicer tabe with columns?
Cut him now
BTW, your format is fine.
We would save more by cutting
Question
That way we don't have to even pay him that 500k bonus.
That is a very good question
In terms of the Broncos, the biggest benefit to that would be with Javon Walker. It would give them nice flexibility if Denver could cut him now and spread the cap hit over two years without having to pay him any of the $5.4 million in bonuses they owe him this year.
I will do some digging and see if I can find anything to answer this. Or maybe some other reader knows the answer and can save me the trouble.
After further review
Each Club may designate up to two Player Contracts that, if terminated on or prior to June 1 and if not renegotiated after the last regular season game of the prior League Year, shall be treated (except to the extent prescribed by Section 7(d)(iii) below) as if terminated on June 2, i.e., the Salary Cap charge for each such contract will remain in the Club's Team Salary until June 2, at which time its Paragraph 5 Salary and any unearned LTBE incentives will no longer be counted and any unamortized signing bonus will be treated as set forth in Subsection (2) below.
The section 7diii refers to guaranteed salary that has not been paid, but I think that Walker and Gold are due roster and/or option bonuses which were not guaranteed (otherwise they would be paying the money anyway)
Nice
Where do I sign?
I told ya this post would
Awesome work Matt!
You have not only put out an excellent article, but done a great service for everyone who wants to learn about the cap.
You da man!
Add Sports Illustrated to your link fame.
Congrats!
(Guru's "Walker is probably gone" article also made SI).
People should get a cut
I really mean it... SI and ESPN make money from content. TSG should come up with some sort of common rights copy right. It would help get some neat stuff done for MHR
nah.
With a copyright issue we would just lose the traffic that we could have gotten, and they'll get the content elsewhere.
Besides, I like the bragging rights when a mainstream site links me or someone I know.
by Steve Nichols on Feb 23, 2008 1:05 AM MST up reply actions
Congrats to MattR on the ESPN & SI
Since my biggest interest in football is watching the long range strategic decisions that franchises make to stay competitive, I need to learn more about how the cap works. That helps me to understand why some talented players get cut or just traded for a song.
La, la, la
Where did you go?
Where did you come from,
Javon Walker..."
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 23, 2008 11:42 AM MST up reply actions
Sometimes I wonder about
For most of their readers, the sight of objective analysis and thought out responses would be like sunlight to a vampire...
GURU van Helsing! Slayer of MSM zombies!!
by Jeremy Bolander on Feb 23, 2008 11:46 AM MST reply actions
Thanks!
One other question: how do they decide the cap?
The cap is based on a % of league revenue
If you have the time, I would suggest reading the salary cap FAQ that I link to at the bottom of this story. It is quite long (makes this look like a postcard), but it does a very good job of breaking things down and also explaining the evolution/rationale behind some of the complexities in the rules.
Read the Salary Cap FAQ
Franchise tag can get complicated
The short version is that all these various mechanisms restrict the actual freedom of certain free agents. Each team can designate one of their free agents as a "franchise player". They have to offer that player a one year contract worth the average of the top 5 salaries at that position. Depending on the exact type of franchise tag applied, the team would either gain exclusive rights to negotiate with the player or the team would receive two first round draft picks from any other team that signs the player.
There is no requirement that a team use the franchise tag and they have complete discretion over who they use it on. Generally speaking, teams will use the cap as a temporary measure to discourage other teams while they try and work out a longer contract. But there are times, like Asante Samuel of the Patriots, where the player signs the one year contract and then becomes a free agent at the end of the year.
There are tons of exceptions and details that I will try to cover in more detail in a diary, but I hope this was a good start to answering the questions.

by 



























