And are you really talking smack that your team has won one of the last six against the Broncos?  I know that is the best weapon you've got, but I would have thought you would be smart enough to keep your mouth shut.

How many people are left out there to be signed? The Free Agency is in a sad state.

If those extra 20 guys on the teams roster that get cut don't have quality, then your training camp becomes week. You can't find good future depth.

It seems to me that unless there were people in space that humans wanted to exert their rule over, they don't see a reason to look any further than the nearest producer...

My issue with environmentalism is primarily an epistemelogical one.  No matter how logical or clearly presented scientific evidence is that is presented against it, the unyielding barrier never gives.  The unyielding barrier is irrationality, worship of uncertainty, indulgence in fabrication of arbitrary assertions and the enshrinement of self-sacrifice as the pinaccle of morality.

Understand, Sneaky, that I do not level these statements without care.  I understand that this probably is an issue that you take very seriously, and in that light I utter these comments with the utmost gravity, because I care deeply about it too.  Environmentalism at its root demands arbitrary speculation, and worse, arbitrary action usually at the behest of some government or another, i.e., under threat of force.  It is a political ideology, not a scientific one.  Science has no ideology.  There is only fact and not fact.  Reality suffers no mistake in allegiance because it is the framework that makes allegiance possible.  Science is the language of that framework.

I don't address this at you Sneaky.  For whatever reason you are involved in the work you are doing, and even though you are a raider fan, I still couldn't honestly believe that you are out there trying to hurt anyone.  But I do wonder about your acceptance of that ideology, because it frames your work, and regardless of what good you are accomplishing through your work, that value is at risk from an ideology like that.

It is one thing to be a scientist (even an economic one) cleaning up pollution, which is harmful.  It is another thing to be a cypher for a corrupt philosophy that holds anti-life as its highest value.  I don't believe you are the latter.  But the roots of bad philosophy extend deep into the epistemological framework of men's minds, and instead of delivering the nutrients of life they corrode and eat away at the best within us, leaving a hollow shell that isn't capable of holding us upright any longer, let alone leaving us capable of protecting anything we value.  It takes a long time and the wear is sometimes unnoticeable.  But one place you can always find it?  In the future, when those anti-life premises go unchecked.