Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

DJ Williams: Paradigm Shift

"A thing must be either itself or not itself. There is no in between."--Aristotle

Familiar Faces

______________________________________________

When it was learned that DJ would move away from his WILL LB spot, the move went almost unnoticed. Perhaps this was because of major concerns elsewhere around the team, especially the defense. The team leader in sacks, Reggie Hayward, took his 10.5 sacks to Jacksonville, and the teams backup strong safety, Kenoy Kennedy, left for greener pastures on the astroturf in Detroit. As the entire Cleveland Browns starting defensive line arrived in town, it was forgivable if one's attention wandered from a LB corp that regained one of its most dangerous veterans, in Ian Gold, and which had linebacking studs Williams and Wilson returning. Attention was needed elsewhere and the unit looked solid.

________________________________________________

Meanwhile, the Broncos were grasping at their defensive identity. Trevor Pryce, initially rumored to be on the trading block to start 2005, was returning from an injury plagued 2004, and was expected to lead the way for what was believed to be a talented but perenially unmotivated defensive line from the Browns that included Warren, Ekuban and Myers. That move alone signalled the distance the team was from building the defense of their dreams. The free agent departures of the last two years were gutting their depth, and the drafts leading up to 2004 had added next to nothing to compensate. In some ways they seemed to be turning the corner, with the additions of DJ, Foxworth and others, but when the Browncos arrived in town, alongside Gold and his demands for his old number and position, it became clear that they were clutching at "familiarity" as the defensive identity that would get them through a tough spot.

It almost worked.

Star-divide

Fast Forward

2005 AFC Championship Game. A Broncos team that has spent the season in preparation for a trip to the RCA dome, gets a pleasant surprise: They will get to host one more game at Inveso before the season is over. The Colts fell to Pittsburgh, moving the AFC championship game to Denver, where the Broncos were 9-0 in 2005.

As they attempted to make it 10-0, and secure a berth in the Superbowl, the Denver LBs turned in a less than explosive performance. And it is interesting to note that in this game, while Wilson manned the middle, DJ recorded a sack blitzing from the weakside while Gold was primarily in coverage on Heath Miller all day. Huh? If you've been keeping up with HT's descriptions of the duties of the LBs, this should strike you as odd. The fact that this was how they had lined up all year makes it even odder. Wasn't DJ listed as the starting SAM LB all year?

LOLB (SAM, SLB)

HT:The OLB playing the strong side has multiple roles. In Coyer's "man - show blitz" he covers the TE. In this case he must have the speed to do so, but the power to man up against a big TE. In other defenses the role is filled by the strong safety. Other roles include zoning the strong side, blitzing wide, or going man on one of the backs. MLBs vary, but SAMs are typically fast for their size.

Because the WILL has fewer responsibilities (zone weak or blitz in most cases), the SAM has more chances to make big plays or blow big plays. SAMs don’t get to blitz as much as WILLs, since they aren’t aligned on the QB’s blindside. Thus, while the SAM may get more tackles, the WILL often gets more glories (by getting the high profile sacks).

Familiar Places

"I never swapped," Williams said.

He had spent the entire 2005 season at WILL LB, while Gold had manned the SAM LB position, where he led the team in tackles with 106. DJ, while manning his familiar, "natural" position, finished as the team's sixth leading tackler, with a hardly awe-inspiring tally of 68. What had changed?

55%.

As in, he was on the field for 55% of the plays, about half as many plays as he had been on in his rookie season, and the reason wasn't necessarily the return of Gold, but the return of Gold's superior pass coverage skills. While Gold saw action in 92% of the defensive snaps, DJ came out in the nickel formations, and was often the afterthought in substitution schemes. The latter was a fault openly admitted in the 2006 offseason by Coyer, who stated that in the future, "we've got to have a plan. We need to be better prepared than we were last season." And the biggest reason they needed a plan was that for the 2006 season, the label of SAM for DJ was going to be more than windowdressing. This time he was moving over for real.

Hanging On and Letting Go

The 2006 offseason also saw the offense add 3 significant pieces to its nucleus, in guard Kuper, WR Marshall, TE Scheffler and QB Cutler. As an added bonus, and in light of the controversial move to waive Trevor Pryce, a move that had been in the makings from a salary cap perspective for over a year, Denver picked up an unheralded producer in DE Dumervil. Besides Pryce, the Broncos parted ways with RB Anderson, and WR Lelie, and began creating a rift between them and their starting QB, Plummer. But still they hung onto the discarded Browns D-linemen, adding a few more in the process, and as well they hung onto shreds and remnants of their changing defensive philosophy, despite seeing its effectiveness fade as the 2006 season bore out.

Most grievous among these decisions was to stick with the decision to move DJ to SAM. He was not a liability in coverage, but he referred to the work at the position as a grind, due to not practicing coverage skills for over a year, having been told to sit in nickel situations. When asked if he would prefer to be back at WILL, he replied "I would have remained at weak side because it comes naturally but if it makes our three-man corps better as a whole, than that's what I've got to do."

DJ logged 86 tackles and 2 forced fumbles for the season, but in a testament for how far the Broncos were moving a playmaker from what came naturally to him, he failed to log a sack until the final home game against San Francisco, in an effort of too little too late for the Broncos playoff chances.

And so the 2006 season ended much as it had started, with too many mistakes, not enough opportunities, and no idea where they were heading. When Al Wilson went limp with a devestating neck injury, the reality of what Denver had created was exposed. Many things of value had been put at risk to overcome bumps in the road to a Championship, and now it was time to try and salvage what was left. It was obvious that the next season would see Plummer let go, and Wilson let go.

The only thing left to find out: What would they try and hang onto?

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great job man!
It is my hope that the Broncos hang onto Lynch long enough for him to impact key players.  Long enough to establish the next great "true" leader on this defense.  In my opinion, Lynch is the only player on defense we have that personifies what past Bronco defenses have represented.  And to think we almost lost him.

I hope Niko turns out to be the next great leader in the middle.  I like DJ, but he didn't seem to have the passionate leadership skills required of a defensive leader.  Lynch has it, Big Al had it obviously while he was with us.  But other than those two I just don't know....

OOMPA LOOMPA DOOMPADEE DOO
OOMPA LOOMPA, DOOMPADAH DEE
It's JaMakus Fail, RRRRRUUUUNNNN!!!!!

by Tim Lynch on Mar 21, 2008 9:15 PM MDT reply actions  

Deleted Post
If you're going to delete my post, at least have the class to send me an email letting me know why.  I subscribe to your feed and read all your content.  If I invest additional time to post my thoughts, my expectation is that you give me the same respect I gave you.  Nothing I said was inappropriate (or even provocative for that matter).  I'd love some feedback on this.

by r8erh8er on Mar 22, 2008 8:11 AM MDT reply actions  

Perhaps I can help
I am not responsible for deleting your post, nor do I know which editor did.  If a post of yours was deleted, the proper way for you to enquire is with the site director at his e-mail, not with the membership at large who would have no idea what you are talking about.  Editors do make mistakes.

Guru's e-mail link is in the right hand section of the main page, and his responses are typicaly within the hour (I can't ensure that though).

Be advised that we had a recent troll attack on the site, and a registered member was banned based on it.  There may be some itchy triggers based on that.  If one of the editors has an itchy trigger finger, Guru will find out which one it was and correct the problem.  If there was a reasonable deletion, Guru is the final authority and he has the class to explain the action to the offending party.

I hope that helps.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Mar 22, 2008 8:35 AM MDT up reply actions  

After you posted your comment,
did you actually see it appear inside the entry? Occasionally the Scoop platform we use throughout the network (though that's changing as the baseball sites are transitioning over to the new platform over the coming week) has a problem or two. Once or twice I've pressed the post button, but the comment wound up not appearing.
Purple Row - Covering all your Rockies needs!

by Russ Oates on Mar 22, 2008 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

That's a good point too.
Rarely I have posted a comment and been suprised to not see it up later.  But that is pretty rare.
"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Mar 22, 2008 4:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

Who knows
Ya, I saw the comment posted.  It was about 350-400 words and I spent about 20 minutes writing it, so I was upset at the wasted the effort.  You are all arguing that its plausible that the comment was lost for reasons other than one persons mal-intent.  I'm willing to give the editors the benefit of the doubt.  It certainly wouldn't be good business to purposely remove content on a regular basis.

I also empathize with the first responders criticism that I made a public post rather than email the site administrator.  Perhaps this would have been a more appropriate way for me to express my grievance.  For my part, I'm sorry.

Thanks for the feedback.

by r8erh8er on Mar 23, 2008 7:25 AM MDT up reply actions  

I don't know if you have talked to Guru yet...
...but I can tell you that he has contacted the editors to track down the problem.  I'm awfully sorry that you put up such a long post only to have it get lost.

It takes some effort to delete a post.  An editor has to click to delete, then go to another window to confirm.  If you look over the previous University story on zone blocking you'll see at least one editor and a few members being called liars and worse and that didn't even merit deletions at the time (though there was a meeting about banning the offending member).  The same member was making threatening comments a few months ago and even dared us to ban him, and we pretty much left him alone.  We try to err on the side of the member if there is any doubt, and that's why I'm troubled that your comment disappeared.  It sounds to me like it was a good post and a lot of your time went into it.

I can tell you that my deletions have been limited to deleting comments where a member accidently double posted a comment (double clicked).  I also deleted a comment that was meant as sarcasm (a long time member who was imitating the previously mentioned offender) and I didn't know him, so I screwed up.  However, I contacted Guru and the other editors and quickly learned I had made the mistake.  Instead of deleting then reporting, we have moved to a report then delete process.  If an editor deletion happened to you, then one of our four editors would have failed to contact Guru first, and I'm sure he would be (correctly) very angry.  

We're pretty thick skinned around here.  When I was asked my opinion on banning the previously mentioned offending member, I (despite insults and threats) was the one editor who abstained from voting because I felt it was a conflict of interest.  I get the strong feeling that most of our editors have the same values.

So far I haven't heard that any editors deleted the comment, but like I said, Guru has told us he is investigating the deletion.  Whatever happened, I want you to know that I'm terribly sorry for the frustration you feel about losing your hard work.  I know everyone appreciates your membership and your insights, and I hope that this gets figured out and you continue to participate as a Broncos fan (and a raider hater).  I look forward to any comments or write-ups that you have to share with your MHR family whenever you get the time.

All the best,
HT

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Mar 23, 2008 8:01 AM MDT up reply actions  

Who are the other editors? I think that all
you should be recognized for your contributions in the MHR credits area.  Just as we are lucky to have Guru set up and administer this site, we are also lucky to have such good material.  I almost never see graphics on other sites.  

Is there a competition for the best SB site?  If not, there should be.  I bet there aren't very many sites around that are as good as MHR.

by Arctic Bronco on Mar 23, 2008 10:58 AM MDT up reply actions  

I'm not speaking for Guru here...
...but the site belongs to the members, and the membership is what fuels the site.  It's comments and diaries that are the focus, and the editors just try to keep things going.  For that reason we try not to advertise ourselves too much.  I think we want to keep the recognition where it belongs, with our wonderful readers.

I'll leave it to Guru if he wants to list us.  But the best recognition for an editor (or for any member) is for people to say, "Thanks for a great story" or diary.  That's what makes me feel good about the time I put in.

Styg's story up above is a great example of hard work and devotion, and I know he appreciates the compliments he gets.  I'm sure it doesn't get old.

"Greater is an army of sheep led by a lion, than an army of lions led by a sheep" Defoe

by Steve Nichols on Mar 23, 2008 1:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Very interesting perspective on the team's
adjustments, as shown by the uses and play of a young player with talent that is still developing.  How many of us really think that DJ still has room for improvement and can take his game to another level?  His potential was alluded to in the first installment, I think it is up to management to find the best schemes and supporting cast to maximize his talent, which is also the way I feel about Cutler's development.

I guess it really says a lot about a player when the biggest question is not how good he can be, but rather how the rest of the team can be configured to make him even better.

by Arctic Bronco on Mar 22, 2008 7:40 PM MDT reply actions  

Another great article, styg
I can't wait for the next installment. It seems to me D.J. is our best linebacker at any of the three positions. Anywhere we put him we're going to lose something at the positions he's not playing. But if Koutouvides is as good as I think he is, we lose less at Mike than we gain at Will. It bothered me when D.J. lost so many snaps his second year after his brilliant rookie campaign. I know why, but it surely didn't help his development not being able to hone his pass-coverage skills. I think a lot of our dramatic tail-off in 2006 was due to Wilson's injury (the earlier one). D.J. filled Al's shoes a lot better than most people realized (his numbers speak for themselves), but his productivity was masked by the weak play of the line and the other two backers.

For D.J. being back at the weakside will be like 2004 all over again, only this time with the added experience. He can finally stop learning new positions and perfect the one he likes and knows best. I think by the end of the season, if not long before, it'll be clear he's the best weakside linebacker in the game. That's why I like our offeason moves so much; they made this possible. I agree with you, Koutouvides was a steal. We got him relatively cheap because he wants to start and realized Denver was the best situation for him. And he would have been starting if he hadn't got stuck behind such a breakout talent as Lofa Tatupu.

Of course, we're all optimists at this time of year, but I think our defense is going to improve a lot more than people expect, esecially against the run but against the pass, too. Given our passes per TD ratio - as I recall only Miami's was worse - we weren't nearly as good against the pass as the raw yardage indicated. Teams didn't need to pass against us when they could run at will, and with us selling out to stop the run at all costs we were vulnerable when they did. Not only the upgrade of the linebacking corps and the solidification of the secondary but the maturation of our young defensive linemen means to me that we're going to be significantly better even without taking into account the draft.

That in turn suggests to me that we'll do better at getting off the field and giving the offense more chances (and less pressure) to do something with the ball. Our most glaring need here, it seems to me, is a burner opposite Marshall and at least one solid rookie tackle. I see Chris Williams, if he's on the board, as our first pick, Chris Johnson or another speed demon as our second pick, and a DT as our third. Of course, if Sedrick Ellis by some unlikely confluence of developments were to fall to us at 12 I'd say grab him, wrap him up, and take him home.

Can't wait to see your next piece, where I anticipate learning more about D.J.'s improvement at Mike as the 2007 season progressed. Good stuff!

by spock on Mar 23, 2008 10:11 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MileHighReport(MHR) is the ultimate independent resource for the Denver Broncos on the web. Along with MHR Radio, the official podcast of MHR, we look to provide hardcore Denver Broncos fans positive, independent insight about the Broncos, 24/7/365!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Haleycriesalot_small
Pre-Free Agency Thoughts
Pumpkin_small
MLBs - what we have and what Fox and Del Rio historically want
Ph_small
2011: MHR I Need Your Help With An Upcoming Post
Zozobra_small
Explaining What "IT" Is that Tebow Has: An Analysis of the Art of Miracles
Pumpkin_small
The risk/reward analysis on drafting RBs earlier vs later

Recent FanPosts

Cube-orange_small
what makes a good nickel cornerback?
Small
Spread-ing History
Denver-broncos-wallpaper_1__small
The First Real Signing
La_la_land_small
Kids In A Candy Store
Small
A Shot at a Mock
Small
Broncos positions of need – off season 2012
0_1979_ford_f100-sequin_small
My GM box 2.0
Pimp_hand_-_the_pimp_hand_is_strong_in_this_one_small
Questions about the Spread Offense
Small
CHEAP SKATES

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Getting Social With MHR

Facebook_badge_medium_medium
Black_generated_button

Milehighreport_email_medium

Web Stuff


 

Listed on BlogShares Top NFL Fan Sites


General Manager/Head Coach

Milehighreport_small John Bena

2011_small KaptainKirk

Asst. Head Coach

Dadndaughter_small Tim Lynch

2_small Sayre Bedinger

Bronco-pride_small Brian Shrout

Broncohoodie_in_africa_small Troy Hufford

Position Coach

Flag_canada_small Colby

182px-jesus_small Jezru

Img_0007_small Topher Doll

Hottie_small Sarah_Marshall

Small zsheely

Quality Control

800px-john_brown_painting_small mdierk