DJ Williams: Paradigm Shift
![]() |
Familiar Faces
| ______________________________________________
When it was learned that DJ would move away from his WILL LB spot, the move went almost unnoticed. Perhaps this was because of major concerns elsewhere around the team, especially the defense. The team leader in sacks, Reggie Hayward, took his 10.5 sacks to Jacksonville, and the teams backup strong safety, Kenoy Kennedy, left for greener pastures on the astroturf in Detroit. As the entire Cleveland Browns starting defensive line arrived in town, it was forgivable if one's attention wandered from a LB corp that regained one of its most dangerous veterans, in Ian Gold, and which had linebacking studs Williams and Wilson returning. Attention was needed elsewhere and the unit looked solid. ________________________________________________ Meanwhile, the Broncos were grasping at their defensive identity. Trevor Pryce, initially rumored to be on the trading block to start 2005, was returning from an injury plagued 2004, and was expected to lead the way for what was believed to be a talented but perenially unmotivated defensive line from the Browns that included Warren, Ekuban and Myers. That move alone signalled the distance the team was from building the defense of their dreams. The free agent departures of the last two years were gutting their depth, and the drafts leading up to 2004 had added next to nothing to compensate. In some ways they seemed to be turning the corner, with the additions of DJ, Foxworth and others, but when the Browncos arrived in town, alongside Gold and his demands for his old number and position, it became clear that they were clutching at "familiarity" as the defensive identity that would get them through a tough spot. It almost worked. |
![]() |
Fast Forward
2005 AFC Championship Game. A Broncos team that has spent the season in preparation for a trip to the RCA dome, gets a pleasant surprise: They will get to host one more game at Inveso before the season is over. The Colts fell to Pittsburgh, moving the AFC championship game to Denver, where the Broncos were 9-0 in 2005.
As they attempted to make it 10-0, and secure a berth in the Superbowl, the Denver LBs turned in a less than explosive performance. And it is interesting to note that in this game, while Wilson manned the middle, DJ recorded a sack blitzing from the weakside while Gold was primarily in coverage on Heath Miller all day. Huh? If you've been keeping up with HT's descriptions of the duties of the LBs, this should strike you as odd. The fact that this was how they had lined up all year makes it even odder. Wasn't DJ listed as the starting SAM LB all year?
![]() |
LOLB (SAM, SLB)
HT:The OLB playing the strong side has multiple roles. In Coyer's "man - show blitz" he covers the TE. In this case he must have the speed to do so, but the power to man up against a big TE. In other defenses the role is filled by the strong safety. Other roles include zoning the strong side, blitzing wide, or going man on one of the backs. MLBs vary, but SAMs are typically fast for their size. Because the WILL has fewer responsibilities (zone weak or blitz in most cases), the SAM has more chances to make big plays or blow big plays. SAMs don’t get to blitz as much as WILLs, since they aren’t aligned on the QB’s blindside. Thus, while the SAM may get more tackles, the WILL often gets more glories (by getting the high profile sacks). |
"I never swapped," Williams said.
He had spent the entire 2005 season at WILL LB, while Gold had manned the SAM LB position, where he led the team in tackles with 106. DJ, while manning his familiar, "natural" position, finished as the team's sixth leading tackler, with a hardly awe-inspiring tally of 68. What had changed?
55%.
As in, he was on the field for 55% of the plays, about half as many plays as he had been on in his rookie season, and the reason wasn't necessarily the return of Gold, but the return of Gold's superior pass coverage skills. While Gold saw action in 92% of the defensive snaps, DJ came out in the nickel formations, and was often the afterthought in substitution schemes. The latter was a fault openly admitted in the 2006 offseason by Coyer, who stated that in the future, "we've got to have a plan. We need to be better prepared than we were last season." And the biggest reason they needed a plan was that for the 2006 season, the label of SAM for DJ was going to be more than windowdressing. This time he was moving over for real.
Hanging On and Letting Go
| The 2006 offseason also saw the offense add 3 significant pieces to its nucleus, in guard Kuper, WR Marshall, TE Scheffler and QB Cutler. As an added bonus, and in light of the controversial move to waive Trevor Pryce, a move that had been in the makings from a salary cap perspective for over a year, Denver picked up an unheralded producer in DE Dumervil. Besides Pryce, the Broncos parted ways with RB Anderson, and WR Lelie, and began creating a rift between them and their starting QB, Plummer. But still they hung onto the discarded Browns D-linemen, adding a few more in the process, and as well they hung onto shreds and remnants of their changing defensive philosophy, despite seeing its effectiveness fade as the 2006 season bore out.
Most grievous among these decisions was to stick with the decision to move DJ to SAM. He was not a liability in coverage, but he referred to the work at the position as a grind, due to not practicing coverage skills for over a year, having been told to sit in nickel situations. When asked if he would prefer to be back at WILL, he replied "I would have remained at weak side because it comes naturally but if it makes our three-man corps better as a whole, than that's what I've got to do." DJ logged 86 tackles and 2 forced fumbles for the season, but in a testament for how far the Broncos were moving a playmaker from what came naturally to him, he failed to log a sack until the final home game against San Francisco, in an effort of too little too late for the Broncos playoff chances. And so the 2006 season ended much as it had started, with too many mistakes, not enough opportunities, and no idea where they were heading. When Al Wilson went limp with a devestating neck injury, the reality of what Denver had created was exposed. Many things of value had been put at risk to overcome bumps in the road to a Championship, and now it was time to try and salvage what was left. It was obvious that the next season would see Plummer let go, and Wilson let go. The only thing left to find out: What would they try and hang onto? |
![]() |
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great job man!
I hope Niko turns out to be the next great leader in the middle. I like DJ, but he didn't seem to have the passionate leadership skills required of a defensive leader. Lynch has it, Big Al had it obviously while he was with us. But other than those two I just don't know....
OOMPA LOOMPA, DOOMPADAH DEE
It's JaMakus Fail, RRRRRUUUUNNNN!!!!!
Deleted Post
Perhaps I can help
Guru's e-mail link is in the right hand section of the main page, and his responses are typicaly within the hour (I can't ensure that though).
Be advised that we had a recent troll attack on the site, and a registered member was banned based on it. There may be some itchy triggers based on that. If one of the editors has an itchy trigger finger, Guru will find out which one it was and correct the problem. If there was a reasonable deletion, Guru is the final authority and he has the class to explain the action to the offending party.
I hope that helps.
by Steve Nichols on Mar 22, 2008 8:35 AM MDT up reply actions
After you posted your comment,
That's a good point too.
by Steve Nichols on Mar 22, 2008 4:43 PM MDT up reply actions
Who knows
I also empathize with the first responders criticism that I made a public post rather than email the site administrator. Perhaps this would have been a more appropriate way for me to express my grievance. For my part, I'm sorry.
Thanks for the feedback.
I don't know if you have talked to Guru yet...
It takes some effort to delete a post. An editor has to click to delete, then go to another window to confirm. If you look over the previous University story on zone blocking you'll see at least one editor and a few members being called liars and worse and that didn't even merit deletions at the time (though there was a meeting about banning the offending member). The same member was making threatening comments a few months ago and even dared us to ban him, and we pretty much left him alone. We try to err on the side of the member if there is any doubt, and that's why I'm troubled that your comment disappeared. It sounds to me like it was a good post and a lot of your time went into it.
I can tell you that my deletions have been limited to deleting comments where a member accidently double posted a comment (double clicked). I also deleted a comment that was meant as sarcasm (a long time member who was imitating the previously mentioned offender) and I didn't know him, so I screwed up. However, I contacted Guru and the other editors and quickly learned I had made the mistake. Instead of deleting then reporting, we have moved to a report then delete process. If an editor deletion happened to you, then one of our four editors would have failed to contact Guru first, and I'm sure he would be (correctly) very angry.
We're pretty thick skinned around here. When I was asked my opinion on banning the previously mentioned offending member, I (despite insults and threats) was the one editor who abstained from voting because I felt it was a conflict of interest. I get the strong feeling that most of our editors have the same values.
So far I haven't heard that any editors deleted the comment, but like I said, Guru has told us he is investigating the deletion. Whatever happened, I want you to know that I'm terribly sorry for the frustration you feel about losing your hard work. I know everyone appreciates your membership and your insights, and I hope that this gets figured out and you continue to participate as a Broncos fan (and a raider hater). I look forward to any comments or write-ups that you have to share with your MHR family whenever you get the time.
All the best,
HT
by Steve Nichols on Mar 23, 2008 8:01 AM MDT up reply actions
Who are the other editors? I think that all
Is there a competition for the best SB site? If not, there should be. I bet there aren't very many sites around that are as good as MHR.
by Arctic Bronco on Mar 23, 2008 10:58 AM MDT up reply actions
I'm not speaking for Guru here...
I'll leave it to Guru if he wants to list us. But the best recognition for an editor (or for any member) is for people to say, "Thanks for a great story" or diary. That's what makes me feel good about the time I put in.
Styg's story up above is a great example of hard work and devotion, and I know he appreciates the compliments he gets. I'm sure it doesn't get old.
by Steve Nichols on Mar 23, 2008 1:38 PM MDT up reply actions
Very interesting perspective on the team's
I guess it really says a lot about a player when the biggest question is not how good he can be, but rather how the rest of the team can be configured to make him even better.
Another great article, styg
For D.J. being back at the weakside will be like 2004 all over again, only this time with the added experience. He can finally stop learning new positions and perfect the one he likes and knows best. I think by the end of the season, if not long before, it'll be clear he's the best weakside linebacker in the game. That's why I like our offeason moves so much; they made this possible. I agree with you, Koutouvides was a steal. We got him relatively cheap because he wants to start and realized Denver was the best situation for him. And he would have been starting if he hadn't got stuck behind such a breakout talent as Lofa Tatupu.
Of course, we're all optimists at this time of year, but I think our defense is going to improve a lot more than people expect, esecially against the run but against the pass, too. Given our passes per TD ratio - as I recall only Miami's was worse - we weren't nearly as good against the pass as the raw yardage indicated. Teams didn't need to pass against us when they could run at will, and with us selling out to stop the run at all costs we were vulnerable when they did. Not only the upgrade of the linebacking corps and the solidification of the secondary but the maturation of our young defensive linemen means to me that we're going to be significantly better even without taking into account the draft.
That in turn suggests to me that we'll do better at getting off the field and giving the offense more chances (and less pressure) to do something with the ball. Our most glaring need here, it seems to me, is a burner opposite Marshall and at least one solid rookie tackle. I see Chris Williams, if he's on the board, as our first pick, Chris Johnson or another speed demon as our second pick, and a DT as our third. Of course, if Sedrick Ellis by some unlikely confluence of developments were to fall to us at 12 I'd say grab him, wrap him up, and take him home.
Can't wait to see your next piece, where I anticipate learning more about D.J.'s improvement at Mike as the 2007 season progressed. Good stuff!

by 































